Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 29

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscernible Unsorted

< October 28	October 30 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Chioma Goodhair

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion under WP:BIO and WP:GNG. The subject lacks significant independent coverage in reliable secondary sources. Most references are interviews, promotional mentions, or event coverage, and do not demonstrate enduring encyclopedic notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tammirex99 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Nigeria. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 20:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Television, and Fashion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete- a casual search online does return multiple coverage, but not fully satisfied regards RS SIGCOV, possible ATD would be to redirect to The Real Housewives of Lagos, where the subject is already mentioned.Lorraine Crane (talk) 00:17, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of lawsuits involving MrBeast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that the lawsuits as a group are notable despite each lawsuit being notable(WP:SAL). Originalcola (talk) 19:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Well sourced, with links to each individual article about a lawsuit, this seems like a good article. Oaktree b (talk) 19:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely agree. The article also maintains a neutral voice throughout. Furthermore, the fact that there are many prominent lawsuits regarding one individual indicate that a single central page to refer to all of them is useful. 2600:1700:3901:DF10:35D6:1A78:A4A:3E47 (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think that the beast games lawsuit has a pretty terrible sourcing situation. It literally just directly cites the complaint from the plaintiffs as a primary source without any interpretation from any other party(let alone usage of reliable secondary sources), whilst not including any response from the defence. The existence of a lawsuit doesn't necessarily make it notable either, so even if this list were to stay I'd probably want to remove that lawsuit in particular. Originalcola (talk) 23:05, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Lists. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 19:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No indication of group notability. Web searches found no more possible WP:SIGCOV. Somepinkdude (talk) 22:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: These lawsuits are already on Mr.Beast’s page so there is no reason to have two. Boeing747Pilot (Discuss with me) (Help) (MY LORD) 19:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excess insurance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I may not know much about insurance, but I know how to read a reference. As of rev 1277633329:

ref 1: can't access the 2011 edition
red 2: accessed the book, same ISBN and everything, and page 112 is not about "excess insurance" but rather life insurance - I could find no other mention of the term "excess insurance".
ref 3: the III does not appear to have published an article by that name [1], and the reference itself leads to "example.com"
ref 4: same story[2], url listed in our article is a fake

With two out of the three references being fictitious, and another not verifying what the content says, I'm proposing that we WP:TNT this article. If somebody I trust rewrites it, I'll be happy to withdraw the nomination. GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🦋 18:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. jolielover♥talk 18:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the one who originally created this article, and I have to admit I have messed up pretty badly here... I've now removed all the sources and replaced them with correct ones, so this should be solved.

What happened: I had written this with the help of an LLM, checked and rewrote the content, then did some copy-editing in a separate tab of my browser to remove the hallucinated sources, etc. But for some reason, I see that I ended up publishing the wrong version, with the hallucinated sources, instead of the corrected one... :S

I'm very sorry about this, and thanks for spotting this! 7804j (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is why we dont use LLM. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, thank you for doing that! I'll withdraw this now. GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🦋 20:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I actually think this is still not independently notable. Could you leave it up so we can have the process? ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

!voting for anything other than !keep automatically nullifies my ability to withdraw, so feel free! I will go back to my default opinion "I may not know much about insurance" for the remainder of the AfD. GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🦋 20:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I am just asking not to withdraw and we can see what the consensus is. ←Metallurgist (talk) 21:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to liability insurance. Cant see how this is independently notable, and the originator admits to using LLM to create an article. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the fact that I used the assistance of an LLM has no impact on the assessment of notability. As to the content, it should be assessed based on its own merit rather than based on what tool was used to generate it (now that I have resolved the reference issues). 7804j (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@7804j, I'm not going to !vote in this AfD. However, I do want to note that whilst I support OKA's mission, the use of Grok in OKA translated articles as outlined here opens up the possibility for errors and hallucinations considerably, as has been discussed in this article's case. You'll already be aware of WP:AISLOP. Whilst not a policy or guideline, it is important nonetheless. 11WB (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Borlet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single, non-publicly accessible source. Googling to find other sources only results in sites which link back to this same page. No WP:NMUSIC or WP:V Athanelar (talk) 09:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Music. Athanelar (talk) 09:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Minor but notable figure, with highly authoritative source. A web-only search will not produce acceptable results in this area. It should not have been included in Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Artists which is for visual artists only. Johnbod (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you elaborate a little more as to how it meets our notability standards? Is there really WP:SIGCOV? The very short stub essentially says "We know very little about him, including his name and identity. We can confirm he composed between 1 and 7 compositions." Is this really enough to support a stand-alone article? I'm struggling a bit to see the encyclopedic value of a short stub so devoid of substance. Sergecross73 msg me 13:04, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We don't normally apply exactly the same standards to medieval and earlier figures as to contemporary ones. The article probably contains everything that is known about him, which obviously is very little indeed. He was considered important enough to be included in the standard reference work, which in itself is probably enough for notability. There are thousands of comparable examples. Johnbod (talk) 13:10, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that its not likely to come across a 2025 New York Timess feature on a subject like this, but I'm also not convinced that mere mentions like that are enough to establish notability in the Wikipedia sense. Are you alluding to some guideline I'm unfamiliar with or something? Sergecross73 msg me 13:22, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
His own entry in the standard encyclopedia on the subject is not a "mere mention"; it's just that next to nothing is known, so the biographies there and here can't be any longer. Johnbod (talk) 18:14, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the clarification. I'll reword my stance accordingly: I don't believe an entry in a standard encyclopedia is enough to establish any sort of notability standards, particularly when said entry is devoid of any real substance because nothing is known. Sergecross73 msg me 19:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think notability is substantiated here. I checked GScholar just now and the mentions for Borlet are essentially all the same as the mentions for Trebor (composer) because they're believed to be the same person. Therefore at the very least I think a merge with Trebor is in order, but given that even the sources I can find for that article are essentially "some compositions exist which are attributed to someone called Trebor" I don't think we have notability in a Wikipedia sense here at all, so I think deleting both Borlet and Trebor (which I've also made an AfD for) makes sense. Athanelar (talk) 15:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is where I'm leaning too. I could technically see creating a redirect to Trebor, which pretty much already covers the (very little) verifiable information about Borlet, but the argument for Trebor's notability is pretty weak too. There's definitely not enough here for 2 standalone articles, though at least Trebor has verifiable information in it... Sergecross73 msg me 16:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not against a merge, but you popular culture types need to understand that notability is not affected by whether there is information online or not. Johnbod (talk) 18:12, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't cast aspersions - no one has asserted sourcing needs to be online thus far in the discussion. That's not the reason you're getting pushback. You're getting pushback because you aren't actually citing or invoking anything. You just keep making WP:VAGUEWAVE WP:ITSNOTABLE WP:ATAs. Sergecross73 msg me 19:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There is the entry in the references section; there are books mentioned in Further Reading. Google Scholar has a considerable number of books with significant coverage on him; they include https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/early-music-history/article/abs/an-episode-in-the-south-ars-subtilior-and-the-patronage-of-french-princes/4F5EA81CC0345A850C971836859832A6 ; https://search.proquest.com/openview/d9810dfdb21e258c9b6bc2f87da5f874/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y The polyphonic virelai "He tres doulz rossignol" attributed to him is one of the most notable pieces of the genre. Plenty of other sources exist; https://www.persee.fr/doc/caief_0571-5865_1979_num_31_1_1185 and so on. e.ux 20:04, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SIGCOV necessitates that the sources in question address the subject 'directly and in detail.'

The first source is about how these Medieval French sources have been preserved, and the latter literally says its aim is only to transcribe the unpublished chansons of the Chantilly manuscript.

To my eyes, the only relevance of these sources to Borlet/Trebor are that he is passingly mentioned within them as composer of some of these pieces, which is pretty plainly trivial coverage. The third source you've linked is a French-language source which I'm not equipped to assess.

Could you be more specific about how you feel these sources demonstrate in-depth, specific coverage of the subject? Athanelar (talk) 20:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They analyse his work -stylistically-; some dwell on his possible identification with other musicians -various authors support more or less assertively and with different arguments the Trebor hypothesis. These are no passing mentions, nor trivial coverage, and plenty of other sources exist. But as creator of one of the most notable virelai of the time, he could, one could argue, meet the specific notability guidelines anyway -like Wikipedia:CREATIVE; it may remain a short article -but it is not that short-;- if everyone agrees a redirect and merge to Trebor is better, it might be an acceptable solution too, but things are clearer this way -and fairer- imv; outright deletion would be absolutely inappropriate, I think; coverage on him in various other languages abounds, fwiw- and please also check the information in https://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/MMDB/composer/COM065.HTM e.ux 20:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also meets WP:COMPOSER..."Appears at reasonable length in standard reference books on their genre of music." e.ux 20:55, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Trebor (composer). I came to this discussion via Trebor, who I strongly believe is notable: see my comments at that AfD. I think Eva's point on WP:NCOMPOSER carries some merit given the inclusion in Grove, so I'm somewhat opposed to outright deletion. However, from my literature review, Borlet clearly receives much less coverage than his doppelganger. There is also a lot of overlap – they may be the same person after all, and as such the vast majority of potential sources with more substantial coverage speak about Borlet in relation to Trebor. I do note the fairly imposing further reading section but, of the Chantilly scholars that speak of Borlet, Plumley, Brown, Goméz, and Reaney all treat him this way, while Earp and Apel (1 and 2) only give scarce passing mentions. So I end up here offering a middle ground with a merge: not on notability grounds or as an ATD, but per WP:OVERLAP. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 22:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here's a quote from A Ballade for Mathieu de Foix: Style and Structure in a Composition by Trebor

"On Trebor/Robert/Trebol/Borlet, see especially Maria del Carmen Gomez Muntané, La Música en la casa real catalano-aragonesa durante los años 1336-1432, vol. 1 : "Historia y Documentos" (Barcelona, 1977), pp. 99-101.[3] The Chantilly manuscript attributes only a single realistic virelai to Borlet ("He tres doulz roussignol"), whereas Trebor is assigned six ballades and no virelais.

Since stylistic differences between genres are at least as great as stylistic differences between individual composers, it would be virtually impossible to make a convincing argument that the composer of "He tres doulx roussignol" was or was not the same as the composer of the six ballades on stylistic grounds alone. No music is known to be attributed either to Robert or to Trebol."

So two scholars say Borlet and Trebor are different persons. A merge wouldn't be appropiate. 23:41, 22 October 2025 (UTC)~ — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 23:41, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. As noted above, I took both the Brown and Goméz sources into consideration when drafting my !vote. The justification for my arguement is not identity, as you infer. Most scholarship on Borlet is related to the possibility they were the same person: this shows they are "related subjects that have a large overlap" (WP:OVERLAP), which is enough reason for a merge on its own. Also, you are misreading the sources. Brown claims it would be virtually impossible to make a convincing argument that [Borlet] was or was not the same as [Trebor] (emphasis added). His phrasing leaves open both the possibility that they are connected or are not, which your conclusion incorrectly parses. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 00:05, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. We don't need hard confirmation on this to warrant a merge or mention there, just that reliable sources cover them together, which they clearly do. The complexity of the situation can be covered in the prose. It'd be pretty easy to cover at the forefront of the article too, considering the lack of content. Even the sloppiest of merges wouldn't escalate the resulting article out of stub status... Sergecross73 msg me 00:34, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is just clearly a case of consulting Google over subject-matter expertise. Any merging that might arise can and should be handled separately from this discussion on the talk page, based on scholarly consensus. Chubbles (talk) 05:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Trebor (composer) - basically I agree with UpTheOctave!'s analysis of the sources, and think that readers will be best served by a single article that covers the composer(s) and the scholarship surrounding whether they are the same person or not. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 08:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or Keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jolielover♥talk 18:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Trebor per previous discussion.

Athanelar (talk) 15:55, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Trebor (composer): Users UpTheOctave!, Eva UX, Sergecross73 and others have made good arguments about enough scholarly debate (although not enough historical evidence), so I think a deletion is not warranted. i agree that a merge with info on the identity controversy would be much better. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 19:18, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alice no Paint Adventure

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Retro Gamer piece is not in-depth enough to count as significant coverage. I can't read the Google Books reference but even if it were SIGCOV, it wouldn't be enough on its own. Suggested WP:ATD targets: Epoch Co.#Licensed games or List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System games. Mika1h (talk) 17:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. Mika1h (talk) 17:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Preferably to an article related to the film it's related to, but either choice are good enough. Go D. Usopp (talk) 05:44, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge into the above: I could not find any more significant reference through a WP:BEFORE check, so it appears to fail GNG. Somepinkdude (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect- agree with the nom s suggest for redirects based on its context, the former would be the better option as its closer in relevance to the game's developer.Lorraine Crane (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Miceli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Current references in the article are a forum post and a press release. Redirect to Neverland Express per WP:BANDMEMBER? Mika1h (talk) 17:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. Mika1h (talk) 17:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 01:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect- to Neverland Express is agreeable, as the subject himself is not getting enough SIGCOV returns from addtional searching.Lorraine Crane (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Neverland Express: Despite extensive work as a touring/session drummer, there's not enough WP:SIGCOV to establish independent notability. As Neverland Express is what he's most notable for, a redirect is sensible as an AtD. Nil🥝 04:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jari Kainulainen

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Only reference currently in the article is a Myspace profile which counts as a primary source. Mika1h (talk) 17:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Finland. Mika1h (talk) 17:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Masterplan (band), his current band, per WP:BANDMEMBER. The article is arguably an unsourced BLP and I couldn't find relevant sources on a quick search (he barely appears in some news about projects/songs on which he feats). Victor Lopes ^Fala!•C 18:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or possibly a selective merge, as per Victor Lopes. A single citation to MySpace might as well be unsourced. Bearian (talk) 00:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - to Masterplan (band) is an agreeable ATD given, scarce SIGCOV returns from additional searches about the musician.Lorraine Crane (talk) 22:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heartbeat Protection Act

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The law is not notable enough for its own article. It has not been involved in any major legal cases or other controversies, unlike the Texas and Georgia heartbeat bans. The law does not meet WP:NOTABLE because reliable sources mainly reported on it alongside other abortion bans in 2023. When reliable sources reported on it by itself, they mostly reported on its passage or it going into effect, rarely any further than that.

The Wikipedia article blatantly violates WP:OR. It has a single source that relates to the law, and otherwise it just cites the Florida Legislature's link to the act itself, as well as an unrelated source that says nothing about the law and is a "page not found." Bill Williams 16:21, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:42, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AFD is not clean up, this can easily be improved upon. WP:BEFORE could easily show that. – The Grid (talk) 22:02, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not my point. My point is that the existing article goes against WP:OR because the content is not notable enough to cite many sources. Most sources barely go into detail on the law or lump it in with other anti-abortion laws. If it can "easily be improved upon" then explain what the Wikipedia article would say. Bill Williams 19:35, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The onus is on you. What exactly is original research if the Florida Statutes (F.S.) is being sourced? Those are clean up issues, not AfD issues. You didn't make any attempt to improve the article before nominating it here. I already cleaned up the citations and long article text within the time since it was posted here. You don't think there's citations out there about this act? – The Grid (talk) 10:45, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 17:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The article is sourced to several RS. There seem to be a few bills with similar names that were passed, Ohio and Arkansas came up in my search, but this Florida one is mentioned in a few different outlets in Gscholar. I don't see this as being a non-notable subject. Oaktree b (talk) 19:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there are already several good sources, and significant coverage can be found online. The burden is on the deletionists (except for BLPs). Bearian (talk) 00:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep bit of an odd subject, but it passes WP:GNG. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Michael Katz (chef)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable, advert, no coverage in reliable sources about Katz. Polygnotus (talk) 16:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 16:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. jolielover♥talk 18:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see any coverage about him, mostly confirmation of where he's worked. This reads like a resume. The food writer could be notable, but besides columns he's written, there isn't much. Oaktree b (talk) 19:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note The article is tagged as potential UPE. I can affirm that it is paid editing, and that the paid editing was declared, but that declaration was lost in a deletion. The paid editor was Anya Rubstein. -- asilvering (talk) 19:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering Tag removed. Polygnotus (talk) 20:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)

Roi Roi Binale (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Except Zubeen Garg, nothing is covered for inclusion. May be it meats Point 4 but not notable per WP:GNG. SaTnamZIN (talk) 16:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, India, and Assam. SaTnamZIN (talk) 16:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Women-related AfD, why? e.ux 22:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Release in two days! Can't we just wait? The film is not an "event", btw. WP:NFILM or WP:NFF, rather, would apply. The film could be kept precisely as Zubeen Garg's last film and thus meet WP:NFIC-as a merge might clutter up his page. e.ux 22:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — since this is a film, it'll be evaluated under WP:NFILM. I'll hold off on my !vote until after the release to see if it receives enough independent press or reviews to stand on its own which seems likely given it's Zubeen's final film. I'll revisit the discussion in a couple of days. EmilyR34 (talk) 04:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not even sure we need to wait for the reviews, after all....For me, this is already a Keep per the coverage of the pre-booking frenzy and request to have it tax-free, having the film meet WP:NFF -and, again, WP:NFIC as ZG's last film....https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/zubeen-gargs-final-film-roi-roi-binale-set-for-october-31-release-in-assam-all-day-1-tickets-pre-booked-9536395 ; https://assamtribune.com/assam/zubeen-gargs-final-film-roi-roi-binale-registers-rs-50l-in-pre-release-sales-1595734 ; https://eastmojo.com/free-digest/2025/10/25/roi-roi-binale-sees-record-bookings-across-assam-before-release/ ; https://www.etvbharat.com/en/entertainment/zubeen-garg-final-film-roi-roi-binale-creates-history-with-pre-booking-frenzy-nearly-10k-tickets-sold-per-hour-enn25102502088 ; https://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/zubeen-gargs-last-film-roi-roi-binale-creates-history-in-advance-bookings-for-an-assamese-film-collects-rs-41-20-lakh-gross-for-day-1-13945088.html ; https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/regional-cinema/story/zubeen-garg-final-film-roi-roi-binale-sets-record-with-early-assam-shows-2811009-2025-10-30....https://www.sentinelassam.com/topheadlines/zubeen-gargs-roi-roi-binale-ranks-7th-on-imdbs-most-anticipated-list ....It's never a good idea to take to AfD a page about a film about to release; generally a waste of time.--e.ux 18:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Chùa Phổ Lại

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems to be non-notable. The sources #2, #8, #9 do not contain any significant coverage. Six of the remaining seven sources were published in August 2025 or later and contain puffery as promotional articles:

Puffery in sources

#1: "chùa Phổ Lại là hiện thân của hành trình khai sơn nhẫn nại, nơi tinh thần phật pháp được vun bồi qua từng viên đá, mái ngói và câu kinh sớm chiều ngân vang." ("Phổ Lại pagoda is the embodiment of a patient journey of founding, where the Buddhist spirit is cultivated through each stone, roof tile and morning and evening chant.")
#3: "chùa Phổ Lại không chỉ là một ngôi chùa đơn thuần mà còn là dấu ấn của một hành trình khai sơn nhẫn nại – nơi tinh thần Phật pháp được vun bồi qua từng viên đá, mái ngói và câu kinh sớm chiều ngân" ("Phổ Lại pagoda is not just a pagoda but also the mark of a patient journey of founding - where the Buddhist spirit is cultivated through each stone, roof tile and morning and evening chant.")
#4: "Không có tam quan đồ sộ hay tháp bảy tầng nguy nga, ngôi chùa mang tên Phổ Lại hiện lên mộc mạc mà vững chãi như một điểm tựa tinh thần của người Việt giữa miền Trung nắng gió." ("Without a massive tam quan or a majestic seven-story tower, the Phổ Lại pagoda appears simple but sturdy as a spiritual support for Vietnamese people in the sun-drenched, windy Central.")
#7: "Không có tam quan đồ sộ hay tháp bảy tầng nguy nga, ngôi chùa hiện lên mộc mạc mà vững chãi, như một điểm tựa tinh thần giữa miền trung du trở gió" ("Without a massive tam quan or a majestic seven-story tower, the pagoda appears simple but sturdy as a spiritual support in the windy midlands.")
#5: "Chùa Phổ Lại giữa lòng đại ngàn không chỉ là nơi gìn giữ chánh pháp, mà còn là điểm tựa văn hóa – tinh thần cho người dân vùng trung du." ("Phổ Lại pagoda in the heart of the great forest is not only a place to preserve the Dharma, but also a cultural and spiritual support for the people of the midlands.")
#6: "mỗi viên gạch, mái ngói tại chùa Phổ Lại đều thấm đẫm tâm huyết và lòng từ bi" ("Every brick and roof tile at Pho Lai Pagoda is imbued with heart and compassion.")

On Vietnamese Wikipedia, vi:User:Thichtrunghieu was blocked in July 2025 for self-promoting Phổ Lại pagoda. After that, many sockpuppets of Thichtrunghieu were blocked. Cherry Cotton Candy 16:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Buddhism and Vietnam. Cherry Cotton Candy 16:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The subject meets WP:GNG through multiple independent, reliable sources with significant coverage beyond routine announcements:

Vietnam Architecture Journal (under the National Institute of Architecture, Ministry of Construction), Sept 2025 - a feature discussing context, architecture, and landscape. [4]

Journal of Buddhist Studies (under the Vietnam Buddhist Sangha), Sept 2025 - a feature on the site’s location, building process, and activities.[5]

The World & Vietnam Report (press agency of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Oct 2025 - a feature presenting the pagoda as a destination in Hue’s midland region.[6]

Phatgiao.org.vn (Apr 2024; Sept 2025) - overviews of formation, development, and community programs.[7][8]

In October 2025, An Viên TV’s newscast covered flood-relief deliveries in Huế and included footage from Pho Lai Pagoda and an interview with its abbot.[9]

These outlets are professionally edited under Vietnam’s press law and provide independent, in-depth coverage showing the pagoda’s religious, social, and cultural role in the region - not merely a local building.

The sources #2, #8, #9 are included only as administrative verification (ward/commune changes, original facility name); they are not relied upon for notability.

Concerns about viwiki are local to viwiki and do not bear on enwiki’s independent assessment of sources.

In my view the improved article now satisfies WP:GNG. Please evaluate the revised sourcing and do not delete the article. Nguyenngocthanhtoan (talk) 01:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at this stage: I was the AFC reviewer. I initially declined the input for LLM and using sources off YouTube from personal accounts, as well as being promotional. I worked with the editor to make the article more NPOV, reduce the machine language and to clean up sourcing, It was resubmitted as a cut down version of the original and I approved based only on sources and policy. I did not consider user / sockpuppet as an issue, other than as a trigger to check sources, so I don't see account issues as a reason sui generis to decline an article. Essay (not policy) WP:LOCAL was relevant but otherwise it is WP:GNG for notability, plus verification as my primary concerns. The "positive" tone of contemporary Viet sources compared to Western media is a well established, all embracing fact of life, in my view, and I didn't want to go into a cultural bias because of that. ChrysGalley (talk) 09:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The sources that Nguyenngocthanhtoan mentioned above have the following problems:

The two articles in Vietnam Architecture Journal and The World and Vietnam Report share many overlaps in wording and data: "gieo hạt giống Phật pháp vào đời sống bình dị của bà con thôn dã", "Điểm nhấn nổi bật là tượng Quan Thế Âm bằng đá nguyên khối", "từ thiện không chỉ là sẻ chia vật chất", "Sự hiện diện số giúp câu chuyện sống đạo, kiên trì và nhân ái có thêm bạn đồng hành", etc. This suggests they are not independent sources but were written based on an introductory article from Phổ Lại Pagoda.
The Journal of Buddhist Studies article is poorly formatted, containing more than a dozen plain-text URLs linking to the pagoda’s YouTube, TikTok, and Facebook videos. This is a poorly edited PR piece.
The An Viên TV news video includes only about one minute mentioning that Phổ Lại Pagoda gave shelter to people during the floods, which does not meet WP:SIGCOV.
Most of these sources were published within a short time span (August–October 2025), shortly after a page was deleted on Vietnamese Wikipedia in July 2025. The timing raises suspicion that these publications are part of a coordinated media campaign in preparation for the creation of this Wikipedia article.

Cherry Cotton Candy 14:37, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Response to source concerns - Cherry Cotton Candy:

Vietnam Architecture Journal is cited only for verifiable facts about the site’s location and architecture. It is being used as a primary/field source per WP:PRIMARY for verification, not to establish notability. By contrast, The World & Vietnam Report is an independent news outlet (press agency of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and is one of the core, independent sources supporting coverage. The suggestion that it derives from a pagoda handout is unsupported; there is no evidence that its article was republished from temple material. Overlap in wording across outlets is not evidence of dependence unless co-publication/press-release reuse is demonstrated; here the publishers are separate entities. See WP:INDEPENDENT.
The Journal of Buddhist Studies article (under the Vietnam Buddhist Sangha) is used as a secondary source to verify historical details (e.g., date of abbot appointment, year established, original facility name). It is not relied upon to demonstrate notability.
An Viên TV newscast is a broadcast news program and is cited narrowly to confirm the pagoda’s flood-relief/community function. It is supporting, not the sole basis for WP:SIGCOV.
Allegations about user behavior on viwiki are separate from enwiki’s content assessment; per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, English Wikipedia evaluates the sources and article text on their own merits here. Nguyenngocthanhtoan (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SLADE the Series

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources currently are primary. A WP:BEFORE indicates that there may be some discussion and coverage but none of it appears to be from reliable, independent sources. sk satsuma 16:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. sk satsuma 16:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and United States of America. sk satsuma 16:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE No reliable sources and no evidence of notability. I suspect this is a promo page for the show. Littenberg (talk) 18:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; borderline A7. No sources and no signs of notability; the article even admits that its subject "has not received significant third-party coverage or reviews from major media outlets". Omphalographer (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as A7: Given that there is not even a claim of notability, it appears that this article is just a self-promotion. Somepinkdude (talk) 23:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable WP:PROMO. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This could WP:SNOW close at this point. Looking at the first episode this seems impressive, but the coverage just doesn't exist. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:00, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks enough SIGCOV sources even with additional searching to suggest notability.Lorraine Crane (talk) 00:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BBX Capital Corporation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP, this isn't really notable enough and I can't think of a good redirect given it owned (owns?) several corporations. Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Business. jolielover♥talk 18:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough WP:SIGCOV. Articles I found are routine announcements and press releases about other companies. MattBCN (talk) 02:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anjalee Liyanage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:NACTOR. A thorough search for reliable sources turns up only what you see: a passing mention in a The Sunday Times (Sri Lanka) article on the film Thattu Deke Iskole; an interview in Lankadeepa, and being one of two example actresses in a Ceylon Today article about "Mega Dramas". Least minor role she's had so far is as the named wife of a main character in Deweni Inima, and I could find only a mention of that in a NetTV4U profile. The rest is TV gossip pages, like the small pile in the external links section. Declined once in draft, then moved by draft creator to main space. Wikishovel (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Sri Lanka. Wikishovel (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect- to Deweni Inima meantime, as the current sources seems to lack SIGCOV for the actress.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NACTOR. Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jericho Season 3: Civil War

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage, don't see any reviews in reliable sources. Redirect to Jericho (2006 TV series)#Third season? Mika1h (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Comics and animation, and Kansas. Mika1h (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:GNG, The nominators statement there is no significant coverage, does not address the number of pages that have talked about this topic.

The Sci-Fi Apocalypse Series That Defied Cancelation, https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/jericho-paramount-plus.html

Why Jericho Ended With Season 2 https://www.cbr.com/why-jericho-ended-season-2/

Forgotten Television: Jericho https://comic-watch.com/television-shows/forgotten-television-jericho Jericho Can’t Stop Coming Back https://gizmodo.com/jericho-cant-stop-coming-back-5326736

This topic is not in the news much, because the comic was written were over 16 years ago. At the time, Jerico and the comic was in the news a lot, the fans forced this show back on the air, and then back in comicbook form. This was what the fans fought for to try to save the show from cancellation a second time.

Most of those are trivial mentions, giantfreakinrobot.com article is better with 1 paragraph about the comic but not enough to establish notability. --Mika1h (talk) 16:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't beive Comic Watch or Giant Freaking Robot to be RS. The CBR and Gizmodo sources are passing mentions about other things. Nothing really to preserve so I oppose a merge, but a redirect would be fine. Olliefant (she/her) 06:01, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh My God! (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only piece of significant coverage I found is this Hardcore Gaming 101 article: [10]. It alone is not enough for notability. Redirection to List of Atlus games? Mika1h (talk) 15:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. Mika1h (talk) 15:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No Japanese wiki article, so that doesn't help... I found this [11], it self-styles as the Museum of Video Games, but I suspect it's not a RS. I don't see much of anything that we can use for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 19:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Atlus games - I was unable to find any coverage of this game on Archive.org, searching both by the English and the Japanese titles. Doesn't appear independently notable, but apt to have on a list of games by the company with the Hardcore Gaming 101 ref the entry is sourced to. Waxworker (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Atlus games per above. Found an All Game Guide entry [12], but that's it. Timur9008 (talk) 11:02, October 31, 2025 (UTC)

Maria Ryabushkina

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Maria Ryabushkina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Subject fails to demonstrate notability according to WP:NACTOR, WP:NMODEL. --Тихонова Пустынь (talk) 13:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)~~ WP:SOCKSTRIKE. ✗plicit 01:32, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Fashion, and Russia. Skynxnex (talk) 15:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. e.ux 20:22, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Caution: please be aware that a simple google search with her name is absolutely not safe for work. e.ux 20:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I kind of doubt the picture used in the article is a legitimate CC own work, given that it was apparently also used on a Playboy cover per a simple Google search? Unless the uploader is the Playboy photographer, but even then, wouldn't the magazine own the rights? Not sure what the procedure for investigating this on Commons is, so leaving this comment for now. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 05:35, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wasianpower, I think you are right about the copyvio of the image, there was no VRT evidence, from the photographer themself or the magazine. I did notice that other images of the same person were deleted by the same uploader. No comment on the notability of the subject. Netherzone (talk) 18:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I nominated the image for deletion. Good catch. EatingCarBatteries _{(contributions, talk)} 04:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG and N Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sigcov. Kelob2678 (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aniket Ujjwal Nikam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indian lawyer, also spokesperson for the Bharatiya Janata Party. Son of a public prosecutor and member of parliament. Not inherently notable, not elected to office, notability is not inherited. Coverage is passing mentions as a lawyer in the routine legal cases he has been involved in. So quite unequivocally fails WP:GNG; WP:NPOL. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Law, India, and Maharashtra. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — routine mentions as a lawyer, nothing biographical or significant. EmilyR34 (talk) 04:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
information and news sources shown this information is correct so i request you keep this page RefreshNatureIQ (talk) 10:06, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:NPOL. Svartner (talk) 08:55, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The subject does not have enough news coverage and does not meet other criteria as the nominator stated. Mysecretgarden (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fearless Leader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page has very few sources, and no reception section. Article has been like this for years, implying it is unlikely that it can be further expanded. I have seen articles with many more sources get deleted for not being notable enough, so this character clearly does not pass WP:GNG. TheSilksongPikmin (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question The nomination talks about the current state of the article, which does not tell us whether "this character clearly does not pass WP:GNG" according to WP:ARTN. @TheSilksongPikmin: So could you please comment on your results of the required WP:BEFORE search? Daranios (talk) 15:06, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very few sources appeared. Most mentions of him were very brief, just stating his role and the fact that he exists, or were about his voice actor, Robert De Niro. TheSilksongPikmin (talk) 16:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSilksongPikmin: Very few sources appeared: But a Google Books search alone provides 120 hits... And if most mentions are as brief as you describe, could you please comment on the few others? Daranios (talk) 09:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have to search for the series name as well since the name is so generic. Most of those books aren't about the character. TheSilksongPikmin (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSilksongPikmin: And that's exactly what I've done for the Books search linked above. And ended up with ca. 120 hits. Daranios (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Boilerplate nomination, deficient BEFORE per above, and even if nothing is found could be merged to The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends per ATD. Jclemens (talk) 16:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends#Characters. The article fails WP:GNG as written. The nom is however reminded that telling us about their WP:BEFORE efforts is a best practice in the nominations. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist. Any thoughts on Keep or Redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends#Characters. Minor character. I dont even remember him from watching as a kid, altho I admittedly didnt watch that much of Rocky and Bullwinkle. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(Speedy) Keep The nomination does not contain a policy-based reason for deletion, because its first claim conflicts with WP:ARTN, while the others fall into the "arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion" of WP:IMPATIENT, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and with regard to clearly does not pass WP:GNG, WP:JUSTNOTABLE/WP:VAGUEWAVE. Later claims that there are very few sources seem unconvincing, given the boilerplate-like nomination with regard to other deletion nominations within a short time and failure to respond to further questions. The efforts of the WP:BEFORE search should not be pushed onto other editors. They are required from the nominator, AfD is not supposed to be "let's just nominate and see what sticks". Looking at some sources confirms that there are indeed many which just confirm the character exists and who has played him. But there are others, which collectively allow for at least a short article: The Moose That Roared has a lot of plot summary, but also has three sentences of creative background and characterization. War and the Media, p. 80-81, "45th William T. Fitts, Jr. Oration “A Seussian tale of a trauma time traveler: Wormhole chronicles”", and others go into the nature of the Fearless Leader representing a Communist figure in the context of the Red scare. Anti-Communism and Popular Culture in Mid-Century America, p. 86-87, goes a bit deeper into the conflation of Communist and Nazi stereotypes common at that time, as does to a lesser degree "POPULAR POLITICAL CULTURE: ROCKY AND BULLWINKLE AND THE RHETORIC OF THE COLD WAR". That's the result of only the first two pages of only the Google Scholar search. Daranios (talk) 16:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was Non-admin closure. Nominator withdrew request (non-admin closure) Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 15:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ummaty International Charity Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot see any signifcant coverage in reliable independent sources so fails WP:GNG GothicGolem29 (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep criteria 3 withdrawing nomination as there is a speedy deletion request that formed while my nomination was loading. GothicGolem29 (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

HSC-6

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Only reference in the article is a primary source. Mika1h (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and United States of America. Mika1h (talk) 15:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In general. we have considered flying squadrons to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ITSNOTABLE is not a helpful argument. Please point what significant coverage in reliable secondary sources have you found that establishes the topic's notability. --Mika1h (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nuvama Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources, whether on or off Wikipedia, should be viewed with caution, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like revenue targets, profit/financial reporting and ratings, share buy or sell recommendations, turnover news, capacity expansion news etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Maharashtra. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:22, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:50, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails in NCORP owing to no WP:CORPDEPTH. The sources are not independent and pose themselves as prominent cases of WP:CHURNALISM. There are multiple sources from RS, but viewing them carefully suggests WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Besides, the multiple routine activity coverages as mentioned by the nominator, doesn't help in adding to notability. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep How can one argue that a company with US$54 billion in assets is not notable? According to WP:LISTED, “sufficient independent sources almost always exist for publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges, so that notability can be established using the primary criterion discussed above” It further notes that “examples of such sources include independent press coverage and analyst reports”. Both the NSE and the BSE are among the top 6 largest stock exchanges globally. Nuvama is traded on both, and it has received independent coverage as well as analyst reports.

Below is a list of independent coverage drawn exclusively from global business publications (since you mentioned that Indian sources should be viewed with caution):

Kalesh, Baiju; Baigorri, Manuel (8 September 2025). "PAG's Nuvama Stake Sale Is Said to Slow Down On Jane Street Case". Bloomberg.
Chatterjee, Paramita (4 April 2024). "Nuvama Group in talks to raise $479m for crossover fund". DealStreetAsia.
Singh, Preeti; Kalesh, Baiju (4 April 2024). "PAG-Backed Indian Asset Manager Eyes Mideast For $400 Million". Bloomberg.com.
"PAG exploring options for majority stake in Nuvama". Private Banker International. 26 February 2025.
Singh, Preeti (6 August 2024). "Nuvama Targets Indian Wealth in Dubai, Singapore". Bloomberg.
Rai, Joymitra (10 January 2024). "Nuvama Asset Management, Cushman & Wakefield set up $361m real estate fund". DealStreetAsia.

Below is a list of analyst reports:

"Nuvama Wealth Management - First cut: In line results, Wealth outperforms Private in a QoQ reversal" (PDF). JM Financial. 13 August 2025.
"Nuvama Wealth Management Ltd: Almost a perfect quarter" (PDF). Centrum. 28 October 2024.
"Nuvama Wealth: A diversified play in the wealth management space" (PDF). Motilal Oswal. 13 February 2025.
"Nuvama Wealth Management Limited Rating outlook revised to 'Positive'; Ratings Reaffirmed". CRISIL (S&P Global). 26 May 2025.
"Nuvama Wealth Management Limited". ICRA (Moody's). 30 June 2025.

WP:LISTED also advises, “Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high (but not certain) likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion.” Uttsaav (talk) 14:51, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

— Note to closing admin: Uttsaav (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 14:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep From the second list above, this one from Motilal Oswal and this one from Centrum carry sufficient independent analysis. The JM Financial report contains just one page of independent commentary, thus falls short of WP:CORPDEPTH, while the other two links aren't analyst reports but credit ratings which don't count towards notability. In my WP:BEFORE search, I could find a couple of in-depth research reports, like this one from Bernstein-Societe Generale and this one from Jefferies, which have significant coverage on this company. These four sources are enough for a WP:LISTED pass. Yuvaank (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment From a quick Google search, I have found over 10 Bloomberg articles about this company with some have passing mention and other have indepth coverage.

Kenzamalaown (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article does not show enough notability as per WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Most of the links are just normal business updates like fund raise, stake sale, profit reports, or analyst notes which are routine things and not detailed independent coverage. These are common for any listed company and do not help in showing real notability. Many of the Indian news links look like re-written press releases or paid stories, so as per WP:RSNOI they cannot be taken as strong sources. Being listed on NSE or BSE does not automatically make it notable under WP:LISTED. The page mostly reads like a company profile or promotion and not like an encyclopedia article... --LexyNight (talk) 16:01, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ferrari Virtual Academy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. VirtualR.net is a Wordpress blog. DSOGaming is an unreliable source per WP:VG/S. FormulaPassion.it and Road & Track refs are both fairly insubstantial news stories. Redirect to Kunos Simulazioni? Mika1h (talk) 15:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - Found reviews by Level (magazine): [13], The Games Machine (Italy): [14], Giochi per il mio computer: [15]. I added them to the article. --Mika1h (talk) 10:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Italy. Mika1h (talk) 15:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. BuffaloTaro (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect – It doesn't seem to have ever been the subject of much coverage or interest. There is little discussion of the game on the developer's article but at least it would serve to confirm the basic details (i.e. release year, platform, developer). 5225_C (talk • contributions) 02:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Go D. Usopp (talk) 05:51, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vampiyan Kids

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage per WP:GNG. Redirect to Production I.G#Television series? Mika1h (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Anime and manga, and Japan. Mika1h (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Production_I.G#Television series: listed there (some of the added sources can be merged); per WP:ATD-R, section in the page explaining Wikipedia's deletion policy that states: "A page can be blanked and redirected if there is a suitable page to redirect to, and if the resulting redirect is not inappropriate" e.ux 11:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Production_I.G#Television seriesCannot find enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG so should be redirected to that article instead of having it's own article.GothicGolem29 (GothicGolem29 Talk) 04:49, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

XenMan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any news sources reporting on XenMan. Does not appear notable. GrinningIodize (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GrinningIodize (talk) 14:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bounce (Bon Jovi song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage, fails WP:NSONG. Mika1h (talk) 14:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and New Jersey. Mika1h (talk) 14:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bounce (Bon Jovi album): Fails WP:NSONG. No SIGCOV in RS. paintdvd ☎ 16:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Born in the U.S.A. Live: London 2013

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage, article only cites a news story about a pre-order. Mika1h (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and New Jersey. Mika1h (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, maybe it could be added to the page Born in the U.S.A.? Jaybainshetland (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Born in the U.S.A.: Fails WP:NALBUM. No SIGCOV in RS. paintdvd ☎ 16:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Born in the U.S.A. Agree it Fails WP:NALBUM. as Paintdvd says. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree that it fails WP:NALBUM, but I favor deletion because the article says it is or was a "limited edition." That at least strongly suggests that it is no longer available given the January 2014 release date (though I admit I haven't bothered with research to try to find out whether that is in fact the case). 1995hoo (talk) 12:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, a comment: The person who originally created the article, Jason1978, no longer edits under that name. He now edits under "JasonH1978." I believe he said he lost his password or some such and created a new account. Don't know whether there's any reason to post the notice on the new username's talk page. 1995hoo (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only needs a small mention of, which is already on the album article. No new information on this article that isn't already covered there. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gobang Linux

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find any mainstream news sources reporting on Gobang Linux. GrinningIodize (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. GrinningIodize (talk) 14:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Go bang Linux? Will Linux buy me dinner first at least? Anyways, complete notability failure and has been discontinued for years. There's not even a DistroWatch page. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 18:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
<Linux left the chat> GrinningIodize (talk) 19:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Schutzenpanzer ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG as Schützenpanzer asserts. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nominator. unable to find any independent, reliable coverage of the company. Ninjastic Ninja (talk) 08:46, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fine Line (Barry Gibb song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs #3 & #4 seems like fansites, otherwise no significant coverage. Redirect to ~~Barry Gibb#Singles~~Now Voyager? Mika1h (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United Kingdom. Mika1h (talk) 14:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Now Voyager: Fails WP:NSONG. No SIGCOV in RS. paintdvd ☎ 16:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Now Voyager ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agendrix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a brochure for a relatively run-of-the-mill company - only been around for ten years, all we have under "History" is your typical funding announcements and subsequent acquisition by The Citation Group. I don't think anything here satisfies the depth of sourcing required. MediaKyle (talk) 13:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software, and Canada. MediaKyle (talk) 13:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only routine business announcements found; fails WP:NCORP. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete globe and mail and similare are definitely routine announcements, nothing to pass NCORP. Never-ending string (talk) 11:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article satisfies WP:ORGCRIT, WP:CORPDEPTH, and WP:GNG, and is fully consistent with WP:NCORP. The company has received significant, independent, and analytical coverage from multiple reliable sources, including L’actualité, La Tribune and Le Nouvelliste. These articles provide in-depth business analysis over several years (2020–2025), which goes well beyond the non understandable “routine announcements” mentioned in the votes above. When the references are actually reviewed, they clearly meet Wikipedia’s sourcing and depth criteria for organizational notability.--Jean-PierreCL (talk) 14:39, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

City University (Bangladesh)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not appear to meet the general notability guideline (WP:GNG) or the specific criteria for educational institutions (WP:UNIVERSITY). The topic lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Most citations are either promotional, primary, or affiliated with the institution, which fails WP:INDEPENDENT. The article also contains advert-style language and reads like promotional material (WP:PROMO). Without substantial improvement in sourcing and tone, subject notability remains unestablished. 0ximjub43r (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 October 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. Shellwood (talk) 14:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Jones (football commentator)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Jones has really nice coverage by BBC, plus I found this probably unaffiliated profile. But nothing else. I checked Gnews, Gbooks, ProQuest, Newspapers.com. Don't confuse him with other Tony Jones: journalist, evangelist, and american football player :) —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 11:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Sports, Football, and England. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 11:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:54, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:58, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Ivanov (footballer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability failure. Only his 2 first games, totalling 103 minutes of playtime, were in the highest league. Lack of significant references. Geschichte (talk) 13:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Bulgaria. jolielover♥talk 13:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG all references are local coverage without significant independent depth also no top tier appearances or national team involvement. Notable only at a local level not encyclopedic per current sources. Thilio^{R O B O T🤖 talk} 13:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NFOOTY doesn't exist anymore. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not understand Bulgarian. Perhaps he would be notable on their Wikipedia but not English. CREditzWiki (yap) | (things i apparently did) 14:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Even if a Bulgarian Wikipedia article existed, notability still might be issues. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable footballer which fails WP:BASICSPORT. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anton Melnik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient significant coverage to warrant an article. Only source listed is a very barebones list with a single credit, while virtually no other coverage on this person is available online. Go D. Usopp (talk) 12:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Film, and Russia. Go D. Usopp (talk) 12:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Only one non independent filmography database cited no significant coverage establishing notability. Insufficient sourcing for a living person per WP:BLP. Thilio^{R O B O T🤖 talk} 13:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Aleksandr_Melnik#Career: his father- Anton is mentioned there; per WP:ATD-R, a section in the page explaining Wikipedia's deletion policy that states: "A page can be blanked and redirected if there is a suitable page to redirect to, and if the resulting redirect is not inappropriate".

-PS-WP:NFILM is for films, the applicable specific guideline here would rather be WP:PRODUCER- e.ux 22:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. e.ux 00:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:PRODUCER 3. Melnik's work was also recognized with the prestigious Nika Award.--Тихонова Пустынь (talk) 08:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article says so but the 3 sources do not confirm it, though. Did he receive that award personally? e.ux 09:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Aleksandr_Melnik#Career. As I understand, he didn't receive the prize. It was Mongol that won, and he was part of the team. News media are just wrong about it. I am not sure how WP:PRODUCER works, but in three out of five films he wasn't the sole producer, and in two of them the films were directed by his father. The two remaining, Mayak and The Northern Sea Route, or the Russian Road in the Ocean are not enough. Kelob2678 (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's! TV Play Classic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, lack of significant coverage in general and article does not have any footnotes. Go D. Usopp (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Japan. Go D. Usopp (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The article fails WP:GNG and WP:VGSCOPE, consists mainly of unsourced game detail and reads like a game guide. Thilio^{R O B O T🤖 talk} 13:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of DearS characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of characters from a niche anime. Single ref is to one of the anime episodes. This fails WP:NLIST (as well as WP:V). In either case, the best ATD would be to redirect this there. Maybe a short version of this could be merged to DearS#Plot if we assume AGF (no errors) about this WP:FANCRUFT. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Anime and manga. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to DearS and create a "Characters" section there, but trimmed. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 15:53, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Bilzerian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO1E, only noted somewhat from the events in the "privacy disclosure" section. Also probable COI issues (at least with the editor who moved this to mainspace and tagged it as a "good article"), and sources which don't support the claims (e.g. no idea what source 1 is supposed to reference from the whole first paragraph of "Early life and education, or source 5 for the strong claims about his role), or claims which are unverifiable (part of the Artsruni dynasty?). Fram (talk) 11:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Artificial intelligence, Computing, and Massachusetts. Fram (talk) 11:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Either deleting it or keeping it is fine with me. I had information about the subject and wanted to see if I could fulfill proper guidelines. Likely just needs more references. 2600:6C64:627F:50EA:C11:4AC0:B185:104D (talk) 18:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Looks promotional, looks like LLM assisted, and looks like bad and primary sourcing. —Metallurgist (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete might possibly meet WP:BASIC, but he doesn't have enough significant sources. They are mostly mentions.Darkm777 (talk) 02:30, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ateba Gautier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not fulfill WP:BIO, WP:NMMA. Ranked #125 by FightMatrix, references are run of the mill result reports. Could be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Ticelon (talk) 11:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Ateba Gautier is a fast-rising mixed-martial-arts fighter who has gained independent media coverage, showing significance beyond trivial mention. Notable independent coverage includes:
- FightCore
- APAnews Shinadamina (talk) 13:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Cameroon. jolielover♥talk 13:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Almaguer (American soccer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find WP:SIGCOV from independent sources to establish WP:GNG, although he did have a single season in the second tier of American soccer with 30 appearances, which suggests there could be sources that I was unable to locate. Raskuly (talk) 10:44, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Florida, Nevada, and Texas. Raskuly (talk) 10:44, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete no clear evidence of notability from internet search and also in article Jumplike23 (talk) 04:45, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Raul Aguilera

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find WP:SIGCOV from independent sources to establish WP:GNG and the player appears to have been inactive since 2022. Proposed redirect to All-time Orlando City SC (MLS) roster. Raskuly (talk) 10:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Florida, and Indiana. Raskuly (talk) 10:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Naqada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be, in large part, original research. A year ago, User:Applodion made the following comment on WikiProject Ancient Egypt:

Hello! Though not a member of this WikiProject, I have always been interested in Ancient Egyptian history, and got a bit confused yesterday when I stumbled on "Siege of Naqada", an article created at the start of this year. I have read a number of books covering Naqada III, and all of them have argued that we have basically no firm proof for actual military campaigns under Scorpion I (or even for the exact position/power/role of Scorpion I) despite the existence of the Theban Desert Road Survey graffito. Yet this article claims that, somehow, we know about a specific siege, the commanders, and even the numbers of the involved troops? Has there been some kind of breakthrough in archaeology or is this a case of WP:OR?

— Applodion (talk) 17:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A few weeks later in December, I put an original research tag on the page with a link to Applodion's comment, hoping that the page's author (or an experienced editor) could shine more light on the issue. Unfortunately, the page creator (User:Carminowe) nor their newer account User:ACarminowe have chimed in to clarify the situation. What's especially problematic is that most of the sources given in this page are offline sources, which makes the claims hard to verify.

Unlike Appolodion, I have not read books on ancient Egypt - though I have read some of Wikipedia's other material on the subject. What I've come to expect on this subject is that the historical record is patchy and requires educated guesses, with material reading like this:

Egyptologists such as Wolfgang Helck and Peter Kaplony believe that Horus Bird and Sneferka fought each other to gain the throne of Egypt. The struggles peaked in the plundering of the royal cemetery of Abydos, which was therefore abandoned. The struggle for the throne was possibly brought to an end by the founder of the 2nd dynasty, king Hotepsekhemwy. A piece of evidence supporting this theory is the Horus name of Hotepsekhemwy which means "The two powers are reconciled", and could relate to a re-unification of the Egyptian realm after a period of discord.

— Horus Bird

If Wash was a historical figure he may have been the last ruler of a Lower Egyptian dynasty based at Buto. Indeed, Narmer's fame rests on being the Upper Egyptian pharaoh to defeat the last Lower Egyptian pharaoh. However, rather than recording this historical event the palette may simply depict an allegory for Narmer's excellence and right of command, with the figure of Wash having been recruited to the task.

— Wash (pharaoh)

As you can see, the text is tentative, never spectulating past the broadest geographic detail. In contrast, Siege of Naqada tells us:

King Scorpion I mobilised his forces along the Nile at first from Thinis.
It is believed King Scorpion I himself joined his main detachment, and marched his main army through the desert highlands, heading south-east towards Naqada suggested by the graffito discovered there.[1] This was to avoid a blockade via the Nile or the interior surrounding the River Nile, for which to distract during the Campaign he had sent smaller forces including naval forces.
King Scorpion I may have outflanked Nubt's army in a matter of days and took Naqada.[1] It is unknown when it occurred, before or after, but Scorpion I killed Taurus personally in single combat.[5][6]

I can't see how the page can talk about the flanking, the movement of regiments, when the rest of ancient Egyptian history is so patchy. I really didn't want to take the move of taking this to AfD, but the original research notice has been on top of the page for a year, the author has not explained his research, and most sources are not accessible online. This seems to be the last possible way of forcing the issue. And beyond the article text, and one of the most fundamental problems here is with the title - even if there's a plausible case that Scorpion I undertook some sort of military campaign somewhere, how can we be certain that it was a siege?

As for policy-based reasoning for the AfD, I'd suggest WP:TNT (technically not policy but it's relevant here), WP:OR - or perhaps even WP:IAR. Koopinator (talk) 10:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Egypt. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the references do not non-trivially cover the claimed battle, and so notability is also a problem here. This is in addition to the fact that almost all of the article is extrapolation and original research. Somepinkdude (talk) 13:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Theorized raises the bar a lot and as noted there doesnt seem to be much coverage of these theories. Can always be recreated and if the author abandoned it, then so it goes. ←Metallurgist (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn as nominator. No delete voters or ongoing discussion and provided sources indicate notability. (non-admin closure) Raskuly (talk) 22:30, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Néicer Acosta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:GNG. There is certainly a possibility of Arabic or Spanish sources which do. Proposed redirection to List of Brisbane Roar FC players. Raskuly (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Brazil, Ecuador, and Florida. Raskuly (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Received coverage in three languages, including from ge and Olé: [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Svartner (talk) 14:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the sources above. Servite et contribuere (talk) 00:24, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per user:Svartner and the received coverage. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This AFD could maybe have been avoided if Das osmnezz formatted references properly, and focused more on reliable sources. I think that LeftBackFootball.com looks unreliable. The article looks thrown together. Geschichte (talk) 14:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Add to that bad writing: "He mainly operates as a winger. He specifically operates as a left-winger." D.O. has been warned about this dozens of times. Geschichte (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear I didn't nominate it because of the state of the article at the time of the nomination, I was just unable to locate sources which supported notability such as the ones that Svartner found. Raskuly (talk) 14:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Das osmnezz has a long, long history of borderline notable and/or poorly written articles. Giant Snowman 21:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. Was Ecuadorian prospect with sources above and in article and ongoing pro career. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:52, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 21:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which show notability. Giant Snowman 21:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Lucas Feutsa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former cyclist, competed in 1984 Summer Olympics but did not win a medal. Fails WP:GNG, also WP:NCYC. Single piece of coverage is an interview. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cycling, Olympics, and Cameroon. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The non-interview parts of the article still constitute significant coverage of him (more or less 130 words in French by my count). He was also described as a "star" in this article; there's some coverage of him in this article but I'm unable to fully access it. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 11:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per Aviationwikiflight sources. Svartner (talk) 17:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It fails to meet WP:V and WP:SIGCOV as there are no independent, in-depth, or reliable sources available that cover the subject. I would also suggest merging it into the article on the 1984 Summer Olympics. Morekar (talk) 19:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect: Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Two of the three sources are routine mentions, and the last one is a interview. A redirect to Cameroon at the 1984 Summer Olympics, where the subject is listed may also be a suitable WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 20:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have access to the allafrica.com sources? I can only view snippets. Thanks, ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm unable to access the allAfrica links that I posted. I was only able to see small previews. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of the article is an interview. The non-quoted parts comprise the following:

Lucas Feutsa devient cycliste par passion. [...] Sur conseils de quelques connaissances, Lucas Feutsa se rend à un regroupement de cyclistes au carrefour Ndokoti. "[...]" se rappelle l’ex-grand champion. Après plusieurs mois d’entraînements, Lucas Feutsa dispute sa toute première compétition en 1983. [...] Cette éclatante victoire, en présence de feu Atangana, entraîneur national de cyclisme à l’époque, ouvre grandement les portes des Lions Indomptables au jeune Lucas Feutsa. "[...]", déclare Lucas Feutsa dont la fin de carrière est intervenue sur une note triste. [...] Devenu taximan après la fermeture de la Socar (31 mai 2000) dont il était employé, Lucas Feutsa, 44 ans (né le 2 janvier 1962), est marié et père de quatre enfants. Il a été tour à tour sociétaire de Papa Billy vélo club, Zéphir vélo club, Ucb vélo club et Socar vélo club. Formé en Europe à l’encadrement des cyclistes, il attend qu’une opportunité se présente.
Aviationwikiflight (talk) 12:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per coverage found. That he still gets SIGCOV in modern times shows clear notability, especially considering that nearly all of the coverage devoted to pre-internet African sportspeople are in offline, African newspaper archives, which we have not searched. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CarDekho Group

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suspected sockpuppet involvement was found in previous AfDs. Otherwise, being IPO-bound does not establish notability. Company fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be treated with caution, as they often reproduce press releases as news (WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE). As of now, the page reads like a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Rajasthan. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think this is promotionally worded, but the references are all textbook cases of run-of-the-mill coverage. Somepinkdude (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. CarDekho Group is a major Indian auto-tech and fintech firm. It has notable independent sources like:
- Business Standard
- Financial Express
- Financial Express
- Techcrunch etc.

showing the company’s industry impact and notability. Mysecretgarden (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This company page looks more like advertisement than information. Every line is sounding like promotion. All the sources used are mostly Indian media which just repeat company press release or funding news. There is no proper research or detailed article from strong global source. Company being IPO-bound or having big valuation does not make it notable automatically. Wikipedia need independent coverage, not paid PR type links. It fails both WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Most articles are like “CarDekho raised fund” or “CarDekho launches new app” this is routine business update, not encyclopedic.--LexyNight (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per LexyNight does not pass the WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH CreepMentis (talk) 18:18, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vserv Digital Services

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — still tagged for notability since 2015 and nothing in the current sourcing addresses that. EmilyR34 (talk) 07:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Impact Guru

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Maharashtra. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Health and fitness, and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — routine press announcements, no indication of an WP:NCORP pass. EmilyR34 (talk) 08:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unless additional in-depth, independent sources are found. Mysecretgarden (talk) 17:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ClickPost

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Karnataka. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep – Per last AfD. Svartner (talk) 17:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep — per Svartner. The previous AfD was withdrawn recently, so this feels like a premature re-nomination. EmilyR34 (talk) 10:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree with user:EmilyR34, premature re-nomination. Mysecretgarden (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep too early, possibly not an intentional nomination (the reasoning of the nomination is the same in many afd started by the nominator). Never-ending string (talk) 13:26, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Log 9 Materials

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Karnataka. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. subject is a prominent Indian business. Sources include:

Mysecretgarden (talk) 17:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anjali Bansal

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businesswoman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a comprehensive resume WP:NOTRESUME. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Maharashtra. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bangalore Watch Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Karnataka. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The subject does not have enough news coverage except press releases. Mysecretgarden (talk) 17:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article can and will be improved in areas where concerns have been raised, and deletion should not be considered the primary solution. Efforts should instead focus on addressing the identified issues by adding reliable sources, improving structure and clarity, and ensuring compliance with Wikipedia’s content and notability guidelines. Constructive editing and collaboration would be more appropriate than removal. ChronoWriter (talk) 06:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been updated with reliable news sources as references wherever required. Continuous efforts will be made to improve the article. ChronoWriter (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Schoolnetindia.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Not enough in-depth citations WP:CORPDEPTH. Existing Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Uttar Pradesh. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Infrastructure_Leasing_&_Financial_Services#Group_companies at best. EmilyR34 (talk) 07:46, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kissflow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Tamil Nadu. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep NCORP is met. Forbes [21] old article over 10years ago gives some good coverage on the company (it had the name Orangescape in 2000s). Citation HP engineers Suresh Sambandam and Mani Doraisamy, co-founders of Orangescape, also hit the magic $1 million mark in 2009. Orangescape is a cloud-based platform-as-a-service (PaaS) company from India that facilitates business application development. Orangescape is.. Hindu, Techcrunch also are covering well the company during different time spans. Never-ending string (talk) 13:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A single paragraph in Forbes, a passing mention in The Hindu, and routine coverage in TechCrunch don’t satisfy WP:NCORP. I hope the closing admin takes note of the sudden reappearance of dormant account(s) in these AfDs. Yuvaank (talk) 12:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Farkas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not the production manager of Dune, this Daniel Farkas fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. Not notable as a businessperson, no enduring impact or coverage. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Romania, and Chile. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Mentioned in multiple reliable, secondary sources as an important businessman in the development of iron mining in Chile. He is also one of the main characters in the chapter "Húngaros en la industria minera de Chile" in the book Encuentros Europa-Iberoamérica en un mundo globalizado published in Budapest. Daniel Farkas is also repeatedly mentioned in sopurces as a link between the booming iron mining of the 1950s and 1960s and the more recent mining entrepeneurship of his son Leonardo Farkas. Ingminatacam (talk) 11:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Seems like a promotional cruzade. Also delete Hacienda Atacama and other creations by Ingminatacam, obvious COI. --Bedivere (talk) 02:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AMPIN Energy Transition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Article’s tone is promotional, with sources consisting mostly of routine business announcements such as funding rounds and partnerships with Sumitomo, etc. It also touts statistics and targets (e.g., 25 GW by 2030) sans criticism, and features images scattered across the page (e.g., “CIP Meet” and “Siemens tie-up” promo shots), reinforcing an advertorial feel. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Delhi. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SK Finance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Going public (IPO) doesn’t constitute a meaningful notability factor. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Rajasthan. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the sources in article are press releases and promotional in nature. Will be happy to see non promotional non primary soruces. Mag2k (talk) 09:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject has some coverage in independent business media, but most reporting is limited to financial figures, IPO announcements, or investor funding rounds without in‑depth analysis or feature-length profiles. Mysecretgarden (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have seen multiple reliable sources with significant coverage. [[22]], [[23]], [[24]] and [[25]] only are enough to establish notability.Omawane (talk) 13:58, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Before found a featured article in Business India Magazine with detailed coverage. There is likely more available. Ninjastic Ninja (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suhani Bhatnagar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Child actress, a single role in 2016 film Dangal before her tragic death. However, fails WP:GNG, beyond notices of her death no evidence of enduring coverage/impact. Redirect to film removed, so here we are. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep from my POV. There quete a lot of obituaries about her in Indian press. Mag2k (talk) 09:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dangal (2016 film)#Cast: She is listed there; per Wikipedia:ATD-R, a section in the page explaining Wikipedia's deletion policy that states: "A page can be blanked and redirected if there is a suitable page to redirect to, and if the resulting redirect is not inappropriate". e.ux 00:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dangal (2016 film)#Cast per Eva UX. EmilyR34 (talk) 08:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sándor Krebs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hungarian sports shooter, competed at two Olympics, was not a medallist. Therefore fails WP:NSPORT. This is confirmed by the second link in the references, the first is broken. The remaining three are paywalled and not verifiable in any case. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and Hungary. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I would be glad to I would try to see if someone who speak Hungarian and have access to offline archives can find. The notability of pre-internet era is quite hard to establish. Mag2k

(talk) 10:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned before changing my opinion to Keep with enough evidences in Hungarian supporting notability. Mag2k (talk) 09:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per the sources that I've already added into the article, the athlete clearly meets WP:GNG. The first article contains more than 400 words of coverage on him; the second article contains around 118 words of coverage on him; the third article contains 76 words of coverage. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 11:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hungary at the 1956 Summer Olympics#Shooting, where the subject is mentioned. Fails GNG due to limited SIGCOV. The coverage in two of the three sources listed by Aviationwikiflight are minimal based on having only ~100 words of coverage (I can not access them due to a paywall, so further analysis beyond word count would be appreciated). Mr. Krebs also competed in the 1960 Olympics, so a hatnote can be added to point to his participation in those games. A redirect to Hungary at the 1960 Summer Olympics#Shooting with a hatnote pointing to 1956 is fine too, but my preference is to redirect to 1956 since he competed in multiple events. Having multiple suitable redirect targets is not a valid reason to choose neither and delete anyway. Frank Anchor 13:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The first source contains 400 words of coverage as the article is entirely about him. Linking all the text would probably fall afoul of WP:COPYVIO.

Second source:

A fegyverés nyomszakértői csoport vezetőjének nevét országhatárainkon túl is ismerika sportlövő berkekben.Krebs Sándor alezredesötvenszer nyert magyarbajnokságot 1950 és 1957 között a kisésnagyöbű sportpuskaversenyeken. Ott volt amelbournei és a rómaiolimpián, több Európa-és világbajnokságon. 1953. január 7-én kerültjelenlegi beosztásába,munkatársa Hegyi István hadnagy. A lőfegyverek és lőszerek, valamint a lövések soránkeletkezett nyomokszakértői vizsgálata afeladatuk, ami — hanem is mindig — sokszor együtt jár a helyszíni szemléken, nyomozási kísérleteken és abírósági tárgyalásokonvaló részvételükkel.

Third source:

Az Újpesti Dózsa olimpikon sportlövője. Az UTE sportlövő szakosztályának vezetőségi tagja két olimpián képviselte a magyar színeket. Az 1956-os ötkarikás játékokon a kisöbű puska fekvő számban a hatodik, további két számban a 9. és 10. helyen végzett. Rómában nagyöbű puskával az összetett számban a 8. helyen zárta a versenyt. Sokszoros magyar bajnok. Az Óbudai temető szóróparcellájában vettek végső búcsút tőle.
Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing. The two references posted appear to be more WP:ROUTINE coverage, which would be expected for articles of that size. Even if the remaining, larger, source is GNG-appropriate, one such reference is not enough to get past the GNG threshold, so my !vote remains at redirect. Frank Anchor 13:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The references provided by Aviationwikiflight meet GNG. I think it is a stretch to suggest the obituary (third source) is just routine coverage (especially in combination with the verfiable coverage of him being a 2x Olympian). --Enos733 (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is what I would consider to be more routine coverage (notice of the subject finishing n 8th place in the 1960 Olympics) https://library.hungaricana.hu/hu/view/SomogyMegyeiHirlap_1960_09/?pg=27&layout=s (top left article, result is found in third column). - Enos733 (talk) 15:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the main source found is clearly SIGCOV, and the others are arguably SIGCOV as well: I disagree with describing a ~100 word obituary of the subject as "ROUTINE", a part of the notability guideline for events. He seems to have been a prominent weapons expert after his career and received some coverage for that as well, such as this / this. He also has a 600-word entry in Who's who in Hungarian sports life, although it's mostly a massive listing of his sports results. There's certainly enough for a high-quality article here. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per sources above, passes in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 17:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Aviationwikiflight and BeanieFan11. There is enough for an article beyond one shot at the Olympics (pardon the pun). Bearian (talk) 00:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a notable sports shooter and per user:Bearian. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sota Aoyama

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't seen anything here making this person notable. A huge list of credits in non-notable films and a youtube channel with a few thousand followers... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 08:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 08:01, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the main cast of Death Note, Death Note: The Last Name and Death Note: Light Up the New World. Lead role in Ultraman Max. Keep. Per Wikipedia:NACTOR- as he had significant roles in notable productions; and expand by translating the corresponding article in ja., for example. e.ux 09:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. e.ux 09:39, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:NACTOR. Has significant (in fact, lead) roles in multiple notable films. BhikhariInformer (talk) 17:02, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio giuliano

08:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CCSTV New Year's Gala

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not enough notability to have its own wikipedia article. Coddlebean (talk) 07:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Coddlebean (talk) 07:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Zhao, Suisheng (2018). Chinese Authoritarianism in the Information Age: Internet, Media, and Public Opinion. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-8153-7914-0. Retrieved 2025-10-24 – via Google Books.
  The book has a section titled "Shanzhai Spring Festival Gala: A Case Study". The book notes: "Lao Meng, full name Shi Mengqi, was born in 1972. ... Therefore, he came up with an idea of running a grassroots gala to entertain rural migrant workers and students who could not return home for family gatherings during the Spring Festival. Against the backdrop of the rise of the shanzhai economy and the e'gao craze, Lao Meng started to prepare his shanzhai gala at the end of 2008. On 23 November 2008, Lao Meng posted a 'call for programs' on his blog. He addressed the nation's netizens as follows: ...
  The book notes: "Lao Meng's public challenge immediately caught public attention. On 29 November 2008, the Beijing Times first reported Lao Meng's gala in an article headlined 'Ordinary citizen intends to run shanzhai version of Spring Festival Gala and challenge CCTV'. When audiences and media were preparing to watch CCTV's gala in two months' time, Lao Meng's counter-CCTV gala became eye-catching news. People were eager to witness the fight between 'ant' and 'elephant'. Many traditional and Internet media interviewed Lao Meng and reported on his gala plan. He soon became a media celebrity for his open challenge to CCTV."
2. Greenspan, Anna (2014). Shanghai Future: Modernity Remade. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 203–204. ISBN 978-0-19-020-669-7. Retrieved 2025-10-24 – via Google Books.
  The book notes: "Shanzhai culture's most notorious expression however has been in the proliferation of copycat Spring Festival galas, now a regular feature of the holiday season. CCTV's official New Year gala—a variety show with singers, sketches and comedians-was, for decades, mandatory viewing for the majority of Chinese. This made it the most watched show in China, and therefore the world. As China opened to the outside, however, the show faced growing criticism. Audience numbers were dwindling as younger generations became unwilling to watch the staid top-down entertainment produced by the state. In 2009 'for the first time in its 27-year history, the official broadcaster's show has competition when a 36-year-old wedding planner named Shi Mengqi sought to produce a Shanzhai gala and air it live on Guizhou TV as well as streaming it for free over the Internet',? In the end, according to Yu Hua:"
3. Negro, Gianluigi (2017). The Internet in China: From Infrastructure to a Nascent Civil Society. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 120. ISBN 978-3-319-60404-6. Retrieved 2025-10-24 – via Google Books.
  The book notes: "The case of Shanzhai, which had the greatest impact on Chinese Internet users, was the "Shanzhai Spring Festival Gala Evening, Shanzhai Chunjie (山寨春节)" a copycat of the more famous traditional show broadcast by Chinese Central Television (CCTV) on the Chinese New Year's Eve. "The Shanzhai Spring Festival Gala Evening" was broadcast online for the first time in 2008 by Shi Mengqi, a young, amateur camera operators based in Beijing (Negro 2010). The Shanzhai gala dinner was not considered a mere imitation of the CCTV program, and it triggered lively debate among government officials and scholars who debated "whether a copycat would be beneficial or detrimental to Chinese society" (Jiang 2012). Shi Mengqi claimed that his online show was simply an alternative to the CCTV show, which was becoming too commercial and out of line with the audience's real needs. In the wake of its initial success, a website dedicated to the Shanzhai show was launched (www.ccstv.net—China Country Side TV). The Shanzhai program was a real success as testified by the more than 1000 voluntary applications for 30 performance slots along with donations of equipment and money and a partnership with one of China's biggest Internet companies. It was successful also because some traditional broadcasters such as the regional Guizhou TV station offered the program its technical support in airing the program."
4. Jian, Xu (2016). Media Events in Web 2.0 China: Interventions of Online Activism. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-78284-280-4. Retrieved 2025-10-24 – via Google Books.
  The article notes: "Lao Meng, whose full name is Shi Menggi, was born in 1972. He is an IT worker, event planner and producer of wedding videos. In 2002, Lao Meng moved to Beijing from Southwest China. As a migrant, he often spent the Spring Festival alone, and so watching the CCTV Spring Festival Gala had become a habit on New Year's Eve. For him, the gala was an extravaganza hosted by a national TV station, performed by famous stars and sponsored by big corporations, leaving few opportunities for everyday people to participate. Therefore, he decided to make a grassroots gala to entertain rural migrant workers and students who could not return home for family gatherings during the Spring Festival (People's Daily 2010). Against the backdrop of the popularity of e'gao culture and the shanzhai economy, Lao Meng started to prepare his shanzhai gala at the end of 2008 with his friends. He wanted to make an unpolished and relaxed grassroots show with a little bit of satirical fun.
5. Kun, He; Eldridge II, Scott A.; Broersma, Marcel (2023). "Who are the people? Populists' articulation of "the people" in contemporary China". Chinese Journal of Communication. 16 (3). Routledge: 275–276. doi:10.1080/17544750.2023.2183970.
  The article notes: "We selected CCSTV Spring Festival Gala (China Countryside Television, Shanzhai Chunwan) as an illustrative case study because of its impact on the rise of Shanzhai culture (De Kloet & Chow, 2017. Shanzhai culture has a rebellious nature (De Kloet & Chow, 2017), intending to delegitimize the authority of elite-dominant cultural institutions through comedic imitation (Chen, 2014). The CCSTV Spring Festival Gala was initiated by Mengqi Shi, a Beijing-based cameraman. After attending the official CCTV Spring Festival Gala, he criticized it for being “not designed for the ordinary audience…, the audience was nothing but high officials and rich people” (Lee, 2012). Hence, he organized a program produced by and for ordinary people: the CCSTV Gala. More than 700 groups and individuals from a grassroots context applied to appear. At first, the national satellite station Guizhou TV offered a channel to broadcast the CCSTV Gala on TV; however, Shi decided to broadcast online to maintain its grassroots nature. With its grassroots origin and rebellious characteristics, Shanzhai Chunwan delegitimized the authorities of elite-dominated cultural productions and institutions by highlighting the taste, identity, and value of the mass. Its theme song had lines such as “The bad new Year’s Gala from ‘Angshi’ is rotten everywhere” (jesting the pronunciation of CCTV “Yangshi”), and “the good directors of Shanzhai Chunwan, forever move forward, the good Chunwan for the people.”"
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow the CCSTV Spring Festival Gala, also known as Shanzhai Chunjie (simplified Chinese: 山寨春节; traditional Chinese: 山寨春節) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 06:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio giuliano

08:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harami, Isfahan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed, redirected, restored. Fails WP:GNG; WP:GEOLAND. Was noted in the 2006 Iranian census and its population was not reported. 'nuff said. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is certainly possible that this was a historic populated village, but we have no evidence to suggest this. Katzrockso (talk) 08:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It exists but fails GNG Ultraodan (talk) 08:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hombarat Rural District. The Farsi article doesnt have much either, but appears to indicate three households if Google translate is accurate. Given the Iranian census saw fit to mention it, it may be worth a keep, so I am not opposed to that. ←Metallurgist (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Having looked into the other language articles, almost all of them were bot created with grants from the Qatar Foundation and others, so that isnt much support for notability. ←Metallurgist (talk) 21:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Incidents such as the Carlossuarez46 case have set a precedent against this sort of thing. The linked discussion notes that even gas stations were sometimes classified as villages with "population not reported". Many of these articles have been mass-deleted, and I don't see why this should stay either. Somepinkdude (talk) 23:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Tiny and trivial spot which is not notable. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crossingpoint

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject. Article has no references, and I can't find any coverage of the subject. The external link in the body doesn't resolve to anything to do with the band (even the archived version). Other external links are non-RS primary sources. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 07:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 07:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lack of coverage in reliable sources Ultraodan (talk) 08:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The one tour listing is about all I can pull up as well. Literally zero sources talking about this group. Article is largely un-sourced and has been tagged for almost a decade. Deletion is the solution. Oaktree b (talk) 19:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost skin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable term, fails WP:NEO. Of the sources here, the only one that gives sigcov is an FBI report. All others are passing mentions or usages of the word or do not mention the term of the article at all. A search returned barely even mentions of this idea (and a lot of hits for Call of Duty), much less sigcov. One or two quote the FBI report directly, but simply quoting a source does not make it intellectually independent of those sources.

I would suggest we merge into the White power skinhead article, which this is really a subtopic of. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Same things I saw. Video game mentions and the sources passing and partisan, suggesting not widely covered. Some of the sources dont even mention it at all, which is a bit synthy. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per metalurgist. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:55, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ellie Costello

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have taken the liberty of searching for available sources on this individual, but could only find a limited number of mostly questionable sources that don't go much beyond quick biographies. In my view, there isn't enough to warrant an article under WP:NBIO at this time.

The WP:PRIMARY source used in this article from GB News is unfortunately also not reliable per WP:GBNEWS. WP:METRO is also not reliable. I welcome any participants who wish to find any more sources, but unfortunately I don't think there is enough. Delete. 11WB (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Ellie Costello is a British journalist and presenter at GB News, and she has some independent media coverage in major news outlets such as ITV News, The Standard Originalflavors (talk) 16:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom. 11WB (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Television, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources are unfortunately not enough to satisfy a WP:BLP article. The ITV News one is about something that has no relevance to the article. The Standard is another of the same report of the wedding which is already present on the article, and only scrapes by on reliability per WP:THESTANDARD. 11WB (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She seems to have a decent amount of coverage from a search. Passes, but not by much. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Should I close this as speedy keep? No point this being open for the full week if it's been determined the minimal coverage she has is enough to pass. 11WB (talk) 01:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@11WB, you can close as speedy keep if no one has argued for delete. But if you still disagree, you should keep it open. -- asilvering (talk) 01:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this. I only ask out of respect, as I've missed the mark with recent BLP/biographical AfD nominations. 11WB (talk) 01:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have to be careful with the amount I say in this AfD now, as I realise it can look like bludgeoning. That isn't my intention. I wanted to note that the only source I can find confirming the birthdate is this. This is very likely an AI prompt article. Just something to consider. 11WB (talk) 01:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1935 United Kingdom heatwaves

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not convinced that this is a significant weather event. I've reviewed this article and attempted to find some sources as outlined under WP:BEFORE. Unfortunately, I did not turn up much outside of one British Newspaper Archive snippet from 1935 and an WP:SPS with one line to substantiate the information within the article. The sources that were already present in the article are WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS.

I have made comparisons to other articles that are listed in Category:20th-century heat waves, there are a few in this list which I believe also do not meet WP:GNG or WP:NWEATHER. The ones that do however have far more coverage, for example 1995 Chicago heat wave and 1911 Eastern North America heat wave. This one does not have that. I don't think there is anything that couldn't be included at List of heat waves, so I will suggest a merge or redirect, whilst keeping an open mind to anybody that comments in this AfD. I welcome any sources that are found. 11WB (talk) 05:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and United Kingdom. 11WB (talk) 05:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Tunisair destinations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:LISTN, WP:NOT

WP:NCORP and WP:LISTN are failed due to the lack of any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Instead the source is entirely sourced to:

The airline website.
Routesonline, which is unreliable and lacks independence per RSN.
AeroRoutes and Airlineroutes which are just a blog.
Anna.aero, also a blog/industry press, and now 404.
Slovak-airports.net - a tickets sales outlet

None of these meets the requirements of WP:SIRS.

Moreover this fails WP:NOT as it is an exhaustive listing of all the services of a company, and so fails WP:NOTCATALOGUE and WP:NOTGUIDE. FOARP (talk) 17:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Travel and tourism, Aviation, Transportation, Lists, and Tunisia. FOARP (talk) 17:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tunisair#Destinations where there is already a very short prose summary. Airline destination lists are a prime example of what Wikipedia is not (particularly WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTCATALOGUE). Better sources could possibly be found for some destinations, but none discuss the destinations as a whole and the article thus fails WP:NLIST. Rosbif73 (talk) 08:07, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What is the standard for when an airline is considered worthy of a destination list? Metallurgist (talk) 03:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NCORP and WP:LISTN. FOARP (talk) 08:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep unlike some of the others that were nominated, this one seems up to date and has enough citations. Darkm777 (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Tunisair#Destinations as an alternative to deletion per WP:GNG and WP:NLIST – I haven't been able to find any significant coverage in reliable and independent secondary sources of a "list of Tunisair destinations" which would establish the list's notability. Most of the coverage is just primary routine news reporting. Attempts to find sources did not yield any that would establish standalone notability per the aforementioned. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. No SIRS sources, nothing to suggest this topic is covered as a standalone. No degree of updatedness or non-independent/non-RS citations can remedy the policy violations. JoelleJay (talk) 23:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tunisair#Destinations. No evidence of this meeting WP:LISTN and as the nominator pointed out, none of the references used in the article are reliable outside of the one primary source. Everything else shouldn't even be there in the first place. Silver seren^C 22:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dechencholing Higher Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advert, not even really concealed as WP:ADMASQ, Fails WP:NSCHOOL. Highschools are no longer considered inherently notable and have not been for several years. This one has no demonstrated notability nor verification. WP:GNG failure. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:37, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Asia. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 10:37, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify or Delete - This article does not speak for itself and does not discuss what third parties have written about the school, which is the basis of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to nominator - This article could have been unilaterally draftified, because it was not previously draftified, which is permitted once. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:52, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon I take the view that, where it is unlikely that any amount of editing can produce references demonstrating and verifying notability, returning to Draft space simply prolongs the stress for the creating editor. This is one such case in my view. Thank you for the comment, it is good for us all to be reminded of the alternative route. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Bhutan#Education or another appropriate place. Bearian (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 16:59, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing WP:RS on this school. We shouldn't merge or keep unverified content. Fails WP:GNG/WP:ORG.4meter4 (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Clearly consensus has been to get rid of this article. It would be helpful to have clearer consensus on whether to delete, merge, or draftify.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Morekar (talk) 08:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Hollywood Star

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Magazine is not notable. All info is unsourced. The only source is for a different publication with the same name. Appears to have only been around for a few years. Eric Schucht (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and California. jolielover♥talk 16:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 20:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~*Redirect~~ to List of defunct American magazines or List of newspapers in California#Defunct newspapers per WP:ATD. It's covered briefly in this book: [26] and in Hadleigh, Boze (2000). In Or Out?: Gay and Straight Celebrities Talk about Themselves and Each Other. Barricade Books. ISBN 9781569801567. Best.4meter4 (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my vote to Keep per PARAKANYAA.4meter4 (talk) 19:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Dakota and the magazine, but mostly both, got sigcov in many articles of the time. They seem entirely intertwined in their coverage, but quite a few profiles on the magazine itself from as far away as Chicago. [27] [28] [29] [30] [31], for a few. We could maybe move to be on the writer of the magazine, Bill Dakota. This university press book calls him one of the most notorious gossip writers [32]. Passes GNG either way, and I didn't even do a particularly comprehensive search. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per PARAKANYAA Andre🚐 08:17, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTSCANDAL, — Maile (talk) 21:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Maile66 That says "promoting things "heard through the grapevine" or gossiping. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy. Articles must not be written purely to attack the reputation of another person." How does that apply here? None of the coverage I mentioned is that kind of material. An article about a gossip magazine is not a gossip piece itself; or otherwise, we would not have say, TMZ. But TMZ, and this magazine, passes GNG. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the strong case made by PARAKANYAA, also note the title is included in San Jose State's collection documenting the LGBT movement after the late 60s [33]. BTfromLA (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hollywood star (the disambiguation page): This page, in general, only talks about itself from a non-notable perspective, with its only source basically serving as its official website. As for my proposed action, while I generally feel a redirect link to a content page is applicaple (as 4meter4 mentioned), I don't think the target pages recommended, or suitable enough, offer enough information to defy such a redirect. So instead, I believe it would be better, at least for the time being, to have this page redirect to this disambiguation page. — Alex26337 (talk) 20:04, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alex26337 The current status of the page is irrelevant when sources exist, see WP:NEXIST. Do you think the sources that exist are not enough to establish notability? PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:57, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@PARAKANYAA: Not necessarily. There are times when, for the articles I consider for deletion, keeping, or an otherwise alternate action, I look to see if there's a chance that there is more information (usually starting at Google Scholar, but not limited to that site). However, this process isn't always on the front of my mind, and I may miss thinking like this at times. I don't want it to seem like I'm indifferent to certain values; honestly, I still see myself as a new and ignorant person when it comes to the many traits of notability guidelines, so I feel a bit sensitive to this opposition to my opinion. Nonetheless, I empathize to your perspective, and have seen that, while the article is in a, "phase fit for improvement", it doesn't stop the fact that there is enough to take this article beyond the lines of such a baseline.
Anyways, despite my neutral perspective about this subject, I'll be changing my vote to Keep as a result of this new development (which once again opened my eyes to this "consideration" experience). Also, I don't want you to take my reaction harshly, alright? Discussions like these just helps me prepare for similar situations in the future. Thanks (I still feel sensitive about it though). — Alex26337 (talk) 03:15, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I believe the subject meets WP:GNG, and the page should be retained. Morekar (talk) 08:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sufficient sourcing has now been provided. Cortador (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maquila Solidarity Network

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Canadian-based advocacy organization. I came across the article while cleaning up high-frequency LLM article expansions from a new editor. The LLM-expanded version had 5 sources, 4 of which were associated with the MSN organization itself, and 4 of which (including the only "independent" source) did not exist. The pre-LLM version (which I reverted the article to) has no sources. I searched in both English and Spanish and found quite a few hits but no sources meeting WP:ORGCRIT. The closest were these [34][35] but I don't think either is particularly close. NicheSports (talk) 04:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Some mentions in various universities [36], [37], [38], but that's about all that comes up. Lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 19:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only mentions in not notable sources; lack of independent notable source. Never-ending string (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: though seeing plenty of returns from casual searching, lacks SIGCOV to suggest notability.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:47, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hussainabad (Sindh)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N 0xReflektor (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Pakistan. jolielover♥talk 06:32, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:WHAC GrinningIodize (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong link, was looking for WP:SFOD. GrinningIodize (talk) 13:04, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment The real issue, as is one of the two common cases in the geo-AfDs, is what the place actually is. The maps shows an area within Hyderabad city; the article calls it a "town". Which is it? Nothing that is said in the article precludes it just being an NN city neighborhood. Is "town" here an actual governmental designation? Mangoe (talk) 16:35, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There had been a confusion between a village in Sujawal and a zone in the city of Hyderabad, both in Sindh, both on the Indus River. See page. Fixed e.ux 09:18, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To add to the confusion the old name of the location -see 1884 source on the page and another one I had added (see p. history)- is Gid(d)u Bandar, which is also the officious name given to Cowasjee Jehangir Institute of Psychiatry -Pakistan's oldest mental hospital, ^[1] seems to be in Latifabad not Hussainabad (although very close). Unless it's located across their limit. e.ux 09:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://doam.gov.pk/public/sites/5646

Comment: I deprodded the proposed deletion because it might be controversial. I have no opinion about the substance. Bearian (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (and merge) to Hyderabad, Pakistan?.....see above. e.ux 09:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 04:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep same reason as @Rupples KashanAbbas (talk) 15:04, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a legally recognised, populated place under WP:NPLACE. Hussainabad has been designated a Town Municipal Corporation, one of 9 in Hyderabad District, Sindh. The district has in recent years been restructured.[39][40], which has likely caused the confusion over Hussainabad's status. Gidu Bandar seems to be more of a historical name. On page 234 of this gazetteer,[41] Gidu-Bandar is noted as one of the "chief towns" in Hyderabad Taluka and on other pages is mentioned in connection with submarine cables across the Indus to Kotri, an aerial electric telegraph, a daily ferry and a school. Perhaps the article is better titled Hussainabad, Hyderabad district? (Rupples (talk) 16:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zana ambush

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another piece of Gaza war cruft. An activity during a war. Lots of WP:ROUTINE coverage that it happened. It didn't change the course of the war. Already covered in full at Siege of Khan Yunis. Longhornsg (talk) 03:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Israel, and Palestine. Longhornsg (talk) 03:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made this page a year ago back when the war was less drawn out (a few months instead of two years) I made this page with the justification that it changed the frontline of the war but ultimately it’s become a small drop in the water, already covered in the siege of khan yunis article, delete The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 03:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming around, @The Great Mule of Eupatoria, and being clear-headed about this. Longhornsg (talk) 04:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:12, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Siege of Khan Yunis, related topic which is a plausible search term with coverage at said page. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 00:50, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Arguments all different directions, but I agree with consolidating Gaza war cruft. I would like to know how many links in are not from the Hamas template. If few or none, a redirect is somewhat pointless. Metallurgist (talk) 02:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
After removing it from templates, it only appears in a list of attacks, so nothing really links into it obviating the need for a redirect. Metallurgist (talk) 06:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is any more support for a Redirection.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment FWIW, I dont oppose a redirection, I just dont see it as necessary. Metallurgist (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge- any useable info to the Siege of Khan Yunis To avoid redundancies, and to improve merge target context, if any.Lorraine Crane (talk) 02:09, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 02:35, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abdalle Mumin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E. Svartner (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Somalia. Svartner (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Mumin appears to be well-known in Somali human rights circles and the wide human rights org landscape.

WP:BLP1E doesn't apply here, he's been detained at least 3 times and tortured for his coverage on human rights violations.

The UN Human Rights Committee criticized the Somali government for arresting Mumin, who currently lives in exile

Further coverage:

https://rfkhumanrights.org/litigation/abdalle-mumin-v-somalia-somali-authorities-target-journalist-for-activism/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/24/journalist-under-strict-bail-terms-in-somalia-after-arrest-in-crackdown

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c204v2nz431o

https://www.voanews.com/a/somali-media-advocate-arrested-two-days-after-bail-is-granted/6796271.html

More than that, and I know this is not technically the reason for keeping an article, I think that deleting the page would make all of us unintentionally complicit in covering up a scarcely-discussed lengthy and ongoing history of human rights violations in Somalia. The work he's done is clearly important and the world should not forget what he has gone through to try help others Aesurias (talk) 02:19, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Aesurias. Mccapra (talk) 05:33, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Giving this discussion another week. It seems like depending on participation here, this could close as Keep or as a No consensus closure.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The subject easily meets WP:GNG as there is significant coverage in reliable sources such as Al Jazeera (which includes details about early life and education) and BBC. These independent, reputable sources establish clear notability for the journalist. Morekar (talk) 08:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Aesurias - there's four good sources in the article. Bearian (talk) 00:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Aryavart Bank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Indian regional bank, actually now amalgamated into Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank. Article history is a hot mess with WP:OWN, Copyvio and other issues, including repeated reversions of redirects. Actually, article content also a hot mess - as is that of the potential redirect target. Until someone can write a decent article on these banks without using an LLM, I'm recommending deletion. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, India, and Uttar Pradesh. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge into Uttar Pradesh Gramin Bank — no clear pass under WP:NCORP. Best to WP:TNT and rebuild if better sources appear. EmilyR34 (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article may be badly written or a hot mess, but the fix would be to improve it, not delete. It is about the history of a regional bank that amalgamated.

Ankits (talk) 09:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If you wants to delete this you must also go for the deletion of many articles in indian regional bank which are being defunct on or before may 1 2025 because on may 1 so many regional banks have been amalgamated to form one you must have delete them as well

Ankits (talk) 09:30, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You only get one vote. Which one is it going to be? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:56, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Walker (political operative)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly a WP:BLP1E related to the recent Young Republican group chat leaks. His other work as vice chair and (briefly) chair of the NYS Young Republicans, and social media manager for Rob Ortt, don't establish much in the way of separate notability. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and New York. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue Bobby is notable due to his position at the time this scandal broke and for his involvement in it. A two-pronged notability, not to mention that he is a successful and (formerly) well-respected campaign manager in NY GOP circles. This page should stay, as Walker was the highest ranking member of the New York Young Republicans when the scandal broke, and frankly, was an avid participant in the group chat itself. This page is almost as important as the Peter Giunta page itself. Not to mention the page of Stephen Douglass. Stephen and Mr. Walker were the only two political officeholders involved in these vile messages. Therefore, the importance of this page staying is paramount. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KittyHawk2014 (talk • contribs) 01:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean Samuel Douglass (politician) (not Stephen). He was separately notable as a Vermont state senator. Giunta is more borderline IMO, but he has more substantial coverage predating the YR scandal from a longer political career, which is why I didn't also nominate it for AfD. Walker is not an officeholder, except insofar as he held chair/vice chair positions at the NYSYR, which does not automatically confer notability. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/selectively merge to Young Republican group chat leaks per nomination. While BLP1E is somewhat applicable, the guideline clarifies that we should avoid having an article on a living person if the relevant "event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented" (see Wikipedia:What BLP1E is not). I don't think either of those qualifications hold true, so I think a better argument is WP:PAGEDECIDE which establishes that the subject of the article is obviously best understood within the broader context of the group chat leaks. Katzrockso (talk) 02:32, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Create a permanent stub Pursuant to Wikipedia's PermStub page, Bobby falls under the following criteria: All or most aspects of the subject are already covered in other articles.

There is not much to say about the subject.

The article is about a subject that was briefly notable, but no longer receives any coverage.

The subject is about or is notable for a single event, after which there will never likely be any future coverage.

Bobby is young and was a central figure in this scandal, second to Giunta. His name was covered around the globe. And, he is young, so he has a future where this page could be expanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KittyHawk2014 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

— Duplicate !vote: KittyHawk2014 (talk • contribs) has already cast a !vote above.[reply]

Keep - (1) there was significant coverage prior to the scandal and (2) it would encourage our critics, such as the Anti-Defamation League, to criticize us for "covering up" another incident of Antisemitism. At best, a merger would be acceptable to me, although it might not mollify the public. Bearian (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What significant coverage is there of him prior to the scandal? All I could find were press releases about him becoming the vice chair of the NY Young Republicans. Katzrockso (talk) 23:33, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Interesting discussion but we need definitive arguments about desired outcomes (in BOLD).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Our Country Palestine (book)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having issues in my WP:BEFORE actually finding WP:SIGCOV and not just passing mentions in any of these, also some source question about which of the provided are reliable and for WP:PIA subject area. Overall, the book appears to be not quite notable nor fully verifiable in RS. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Palestine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Geography, and Palestine. jolielover♥talk 02:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Apparently this was a geographical encyclopedia that some pro-Israeli organizations claimed was used in some schools and there was some controversy over the material [42] [43] [44]. From what I can tell, this is a very highly cited work too ([45]) Katzrockso (talk) 03:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lean delete Coverage seems minor and passing mentions. No real reviews of it and even the Arabic article doesnt have much. ←Metallurgist (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep, this book (or rather: books), are an important part of Palestinian history. Mustafa Murad Al-Dabbagh spent years going around in Palestinian refugee camps, asking people to tell him about their home villages. Unfortunately, they are (still) only available in Arabic (which I don't read/speak), otherwise I would have linked it more, Huldra (talk) 23:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, fully agree with Huldra but even the current sources seem fine. User:Easternsahara_{review and this} 23:40, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yogananda Institute of Technology and Science

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent references WP:RS and doesn't satisfy WP:NHSCHOOL, WP:NORG and WP:SNG. Not to be confused with a similar named research institute. No inherent notability. Looks like an Advertisement. Garudindflamewing ^(talk) 01:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Garudindflamewing ^(talk) 01:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Andhra Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- lack of enough SIGCOV sources to establish notability even with additional searches.Lorraine Crane (talk) 02:42, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

G Pulla Reddy College of Engineering & Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent references WP:RS and doesn't satisfy WP:NHSCHOOL, WP:NORG and WP:SNG. Not to be confused with a similar named research institute. No inherent notability. Looks like an Advertisement. Garudindflamewing ^(talk) 01:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Garudindflamewing ^(talk) 01:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Engineering, and Andhra Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Andhra Pradesh. jolielover♥talk 02:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have done a quick BEFORE search and found some references containing trivial information only, thus not sufficient to establish notability. Fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV and also WP:NORG. Redirect also be an appropriate option, If suitable title to redirect is found citing reliable and independent references to the topic. Please ping me when references containing significant coverage are found. Fade258 (talk) 14:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- lacking enough SIGCOV to support notability even with additional searches.Lorraine Crane (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2012 IIHF U18 Challenge Cup of Asia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT. Entirely sourced by primary sources. This is a junior competition of minnow ice hockey teams. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Ice hockey, and Asia. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is an international-level junior ice hockey event. It is poorly written at this time, but WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. English-language sources are limited, and a merger to IIHF Asia Cup is an alternative to deletion. Flibirigit (talk) 11:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where are the third party sources? LibStar (talk) 21:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also I'm not nominating this because it is "poorly written", it is because it lacks third party sources. LibStar (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Leaning delete, but if this is being AFDed, the whole series probably should be. ←Metallurgist (talk) 21:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Flibirigit. --Hockeyben ^{(talk -} ^contribs) 18:49, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PERX. LibStar (talk) 23:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Srinivasa Ramanujan Institute of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent references WP:RS and doesn't satisfy WP:NHSCHOOL, WP:NORG and WP:SNG. Not to be confused with a similar named research institute. No inherent notability. Looks like an Advertisement. Garudindflamewing ^(talk) 01:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Garudindflamewing ^(talk) 01:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Andhra Pradesh. Shellwood (talk) 01:44, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have done a quick BEFORE search and found some references but not sufficient to establish notability. Fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV and also WP:NORG. Redirect also be an appropriate option, If suitable title to redirect is found citing reliable and independent references to the topic. Please ping me when references containing significant coverage are found.Fade258 (talk) 13:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- lack of enough SIGCOV to support notability, even with additional searches.Lorraine Crane (talk) 16:12, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tarik bin Faisal Al-Qasimi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After trimming a massive WP:REFBOMB, the lack of WP:SIGCOV for this businessman becomes quite apparent. The article is heavily promotional either way. JTtheOG (talk) 00:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Martial arts, and United Arab Emirates. JTtheOG (talk) 00:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I looked only at the martial arts part of this article. There are claims of "world" medals but he never competed at a world championship. His second place at the 2015 European Open championships was in the age division "Master 3", which is 3 age groups older than the adult divisions. His silver medal was in a division with only 2 competitors, so he didn't even win a match.[46] There's also no evidence that he's a professional martial artist and has no accomplishments that would show notability as a martial artist. Papaursa (talk) 10:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sourcing is insufficient, and the article was obviously created by a SPA to promote this person.

Keep. Subject is a member of the UAE’s Al Qasimi royal family, a prominent businessman and a jiu‑jitsu competitor. Some independent coverage includes Gulf News, Zawya, Hadara Magazine, WAM etc. There should be more Originalflavors (talk) 17:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing these sources. 1 and 4 are not significant coverage, while 2 is clearly labeled a press release and is thus non-independent. The only one approaching SIGCOV is the Hadara article, and even that consists mostly of interview quotes. The very little analysis provided by the author is presented in a very promotional manner. I'll leave it up to others to analyze these sources. JTtheOG (talk) 17:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf News is not a RS for Emirati politics (see here). Cortador (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on the above discussion. We've been in the process of deleting or redirecting a lot of minor royalty/nobility who are not independently notable. Bearian (talk) 00:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet WP:GNG or to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV. Fade258 (talk) 13:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://doam.gov.pk/public/sites/5646

[1]