Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Finance

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Finance. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Finance|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Finance. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Finance/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Finance

XBRLS

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this page. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

pdwxbrl (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (Holds a paid position at XBRL International, the not-for-profit responsible for the XBRL standard)

I believe that this page does not meet the general notability criteria. The Talk:XBRLS page itself states (from 2008):

"XBRLS doesn't have much notability and jus[sic] a few links because XBRLS is a brand new, only a few months old."

XBRLS was an idea that never gained any traction, and it's inclusion as a separate page is inconsistent with other XBRL-related developments that are mentioned on the main XBRL page. For example, Inline XBRL is used for millions of company reports every year, including UK tax filings, filings for listed EU companies (under ESEF), and filings to the US SEC, Japan FSA, and South African CIPC, and yet is covered in a section on the main XBRL page.

The only relevant first-page hits for a Google search for XBRLS are the wikipedia page, and an article written by the authors of XBRLS.

XBRLS was not an official XBRL Standard, and its inclusion as a separate page is likely to cause confusion to readers. Pdwxbrl (talk) 11:41, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:08, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:27, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to XBRL, especially since it's defined as a subset of it, and there doesn't seem to be so much specific coverage about it. MarioGom (talk) 19:42, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Asphales

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to establish notability under WP:GNG; lacks substantial independent, reliable secondary sources covering the subject beyond minimal, trivial mentions AndesExplorer (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Belgium. AndesExplorer (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the Wikipedia Library includes access to De Standaard, a major Belgian newspaper. A quick search turns up 16 hits for articles containing "Asphales" and 15 hits for "Fortales" (Asphales' current name).--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 02:17, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aramco Financial Services Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient independent, reliable sources demonstrating notability per WP:GNG; sourcing relies heavily on the parent company (Saudi Aramco) business reporting. AndesExplorer (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Saudi Arabia. AndesExplorer (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Certificate of Financial Responsibility written in 2014. Aramco Financial Services Company was written in 2006 and seems to be about the same subject matter. However, Certificate of Financial Responsibility seems to make more sense. In the long run, I'm not sure this subject matter is worthy of an article. — Maile (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Banknotes of the Swakopmund Bookshop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Absolutiva (talk) 09:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:08, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - maybe there is something here, but the only reference on the page is to something it (the page) says is incorrect. I can't find anything else. JMWt (talk) 19:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Geroski curve

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established with independent sources. Cite 1 in version is the original article by Geroski himself (also the external link), 2 pre-dates Geroski's article and does not mention it, 3 and 4 are both irrelevant ref-bomb links. Reywas92^Talk 03:51, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Economics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:29, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I respectfully disagree with the nomination for deletion and believe the article on the Geroski curve can meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines (WP:GNG) with my added improvements. The Geroski curve, named after economist Paul Geroski, describes a model of industry evolution through stages of innovation, dominant design, and consolidation, which is a significant concept in economics and innovation studies. While the current article relies heavily on a primary source (Geroski, 2000), I have identified additional reliable, independent secondary sources that provide significant coverage of Geroski’s model or its underlying concepts:

- Markides, C., & Geroski, P. A. (2005). Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets. This book discusses the role of dominant design in industry evolution, building on Geroski’s framework, and is widely cited in innovation literature. [Source available via Google Books or academic libraries.]
- Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2006). "The Emergence of Dominant Designs" Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 1–17. This peer-reviewed article examines the dominant design and cites Geroski’s work on industry evolution, providing an independent analysis of his model. [DOI:10.1509/jmkg.70.1.001.q]
- Suarez, F. F., Grodal, S., & Gotsopoulos, A. (2015). "Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry" Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 437–448. This article references Geroski’s contributions to understanding dominant design and industry life cycles. [DOI: 10.1002/smj.2225]

These sources demonstrate that Geroski’s model, or the concepts closely associated with it (e.g., S-curve diffusion, dominant design), has received significant coverage in reliable, independent outlets. The term "Geroski curve" may be a specific framing of his broader work on technology diffusion and industry evolution, as described in The Evolution of New Markets (Geroski, 2003), which has been reviewed and cited in academic literature.Whoisjohngalt (talk) 20:19, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Geroski wrote the first one here, it's not independent... I can only access the abstract for the second, but Geroski is not cited in the references. For the third, Geroski is cited a few times, but "Geroski curve" is not mentioned, nor literally anywhere else. Dominant design or Paul Geroski seems to be the appropriate place for some coverage of this type of research, not a standalone article with a name you apparently made up out of thin air. Reywas92^Talk 23:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I largely agree with Reywas92 in this case. The specific term "Geroski Curve" seems to be synthesized and should not have its own article per WP:SYNTH. The basic concept of the model could easily be discussed on Geroski's page instead. It's also just a sigmoidal curve and these sorts of patterns are found everywhere. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:50, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: The term itself has practically no coverage in popular or scientific media. Hence it should be deleted, but since the foundational publication on innovation diffusion has a significant amount of citations and follow-up research, I would merge the article to somewhere else. Target destinations are Paul Geroski or Diffusion of innovations. Pragmatic Puffin (talk) 07:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvin Uwaibi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. WP:ROTM business person. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:23, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Finance, Business, and Nigeria. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:23, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree, nothing notable here. Mccapra (talk) 13:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sources are definitely WP:ROTM. I see someone who could be notable if they have SIGCOV sources. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:07, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karnataka Grameena Bank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A stub, ineligible for draftify as it's a contested move. I'm honestly a little confused about the technical details. It looks like the author submitted an empty Draft:Karnataka Grameena Bank to AfC, then bypassed AfC and moved their sandbox to this article, which User:Dan arndt moved to Draft:Draft:Karnataka Grameena Bank as not ready for mainspace. Author moved it back to mainspace citing WP:RMUM but I (and possibly Dan) would disagree that It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 07:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Karnataka. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 07:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete to make it possible to move Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank to this title, since Karnataka Grameena Bank is the new name for Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank. Karnataka Gramin Bank should also be created as a redirect, as that bank has merged with KVGB to create the Karnataka Grameena Bank. That's assuming that we can get a reliable source supporting the information about the merger. --bonadea contributions talk 09:50, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, in order to allow Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank to be redirected to this title, as per Bonadea's rationale above. Dan arndt (talk) 02:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Karnataka Grameena Bank is a government-established Regional Rural Bank formed by the amalgamation of two major RRBs under a central policy. It is notable, has verifiable sources (official website, RBI announcements), and serves over 1,751 branches in Karnataka. Reliable references from government portals and media exist. Prajwalylp (talk) 14:56, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Department of Financial Services notifies amalgamation of 26 RRBs in fourth phase of amalgamation Prajwalylp (talk) 14:59, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Karnataka Grameena Bank is a government-established Regional Rural Bank formed by the amalgamation of two major RRBs under a central policy. It is notable, has verifiable sources (official website, RBI announcements), and serves over 1,751 branches in Karnataka. Reliable references from government portals and media exist. Prajwalylp (talk) 03:17, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karnataka Grameena Bank is a government-established financial institution formed under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, through the amalgamation of two notable RRBs – Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank and Karnataka Gramin Bank. This amalgamation was officially notified by the Government of India as part of its national “One State, One RRB” policy. The subject is verifiable via official and reliable sources including the bank’s [official website](https://www.karnatakagrameenabank.com), Canara Bank (sponsor bank), RBI circulars, and government press releases. As one of the largest RRBs in India with 1,700+ branches, it meets notability criteria for organizations. The article can be improved with inline citations, but deletion is unnecessary and counterproductive. Prajwalylp (talk) 02:40, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think the reasoning is above sufficient to delete. It would be enough to delete it on its own due to the lack of RSes but the fact that there is an opportunity cost here further bolsters deletion. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 20:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kennedy Ekezie

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This entrepreneur's article was deleted after an AfD discussion in April 2023 (and this 2020 AfD discussion and this 2018 MfD discussion). It was nominated on the basis of lacking reliable/independent sources, but was re-published later that year. I don't see any improvement in available reliable sources on the article subject (e.g., sources published since the last deletion). The article for his company, Kippa, also seems lacking in sourcing and possibly doesn't meet WP:NCORP, so I'm not sure a merge/redirect would be too useful in this situation. Best, Bridget (talk) 21:46, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. Bridget (talk) 21:49, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy, Finance, and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:27, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang Müller (banking executive)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On May 9, Asilvering PRODed this article because the reference links supporting coverage of a non-notable CEO clearly ended with ?utm_source=chatgpt.com URL slug. The following day, Leonstojka endorsed the PROD. After removing the PROD tag, an IP editor has simply rearranged the content and snipped off this tell-tale sign of LLM-generated text from some of the references. The added citations to Muller's Karlsruhe Institute of Technology teaching page and the BBBank website itself do not show significant coverage by independent, reliable sources to establish notability. The only significant coverage appears in the first source, but its hosting on Yumpu suggests that this is affiliated promotional material, though I would appreciate the insight of any German-speaking editors as to whether this is the case. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 17:23, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Finance. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 17:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:13, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, for the same reason as my prod. The first source is an interview with Transfer-Magazin (I believe this is their website, but I haven't done any investigation and this may be some other German-language magazine named Transfer: [1]) and is not secondary coverage. -- asilvering (talk) 20:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
transfer is the only German-language academic journal focused on communication and brand management. Published by the Deutsche Werbewissenschaftliche Gesellschaft e.V. (DWG), it aims to promote advertising science and facilitate knowledge transfer. The DWG is led by an honorary board chaired by H. Dieter Dahlhoff, with members including scholars and industry experts from across the German-speaking world. Vinsmokegerma (talk) 09:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this is their website: https://transfer-zeitschrift.net/ Vinsmokegerma (talk) 09:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The title "bank executive" could be applied to any bank employee who has a desk and/or their own office space. This reads like an employment resume. "modernizing the bank's operations and expanding its services" could be any number if things. We know his career advancements, but nothing whatsoever about any notable achievements. — Maile (talk) 03:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As CEO, Wolfgang Müller transformed BBBank from a niche civil servant bank into a modern cooperative retail bank. He expanded the customer base beyond public employees, led the digitalization of services, and maintained the bank’s financial stability through crises. I believe he played a key role within BBBank, and his contributions were valuable. Vinsmokegerma (talk) 08:58, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eleving Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG - no indication of WP:SUSTAINED notability supported by WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 03:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and google does not show sources

Czarking0 (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Latvia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:35, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 03:24, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Musfiq Mannan Choudhury

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly passing mentions in sources and he isn't a highly-cited researcher ([2]). It does note he is a vice-chancellor of a university, but this institution doesn't seem particularly noteworthy or reputable (although perhaps someone who knows more about the regulation of higher ed. in Bangladesh can correct me) Leonstojka (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Bangladesh. Leonstojka (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is daddy (Abdul Mannan Choudhury) who is the vice-chancellor. The article was created in good faith, but has subsequently attracted unwelcome editing from single purpose accounts that appear to have a close connection to him. If the article is kept, it will need watchers. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: He is not a highly-cited researcher, but after reading the article, it seems it passed GNG because he has coverage in Bangladeshi newspapers. Somajyoti ✉ 20:02, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I had a look at the Bangladeshi coverage (Daily Star, Daily Sun etc) before making the nomination and it was generally routine announcements and brief mentions. However, there was a story published today where the article subject has a more significant role; whether this is enough to justify preserving the article, or if the info should instead be entered elsewhere, I'll leave for others to determine. I imagine this discussion will probably get relisted. Leonstojka (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

InstaPay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The app is not notable by its own, and it does not have enough reliable third party sources with journalistic significant not just press-released coverage. All the sources within the page and the ones I managed to find BEFORE are only event-based - Egypt's central bank launched... Norlk (talk) 15:33, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep InstaPay is a nationally significant app in Egypt, launched under the Egyptian Central Bank's strategy for digital payments. It is widely adopted and integrated into government and private banking systems. many sources talked about it such as her bankygate.com and enterprise.news and ahram.org.eg Mohamed Ouda (talk) 19:29, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The article subject could be mentioned in the article about the Central Bank of Egypt and this article redirected there as an alternative to deletion. Pavlor (talk) 05:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A notable product in the financial world, with notability backed up by reliable sourcing.Simxaraba (talk) 09:25, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Software, and Egypt. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:57, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National Council on Compensation Insurance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no references at all to this insurance-related industry-funded company in Florida. FeralOink (talk) 01:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Business. FeralOink (talk) 01:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, United States of America, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article needs to be improved and sourced (If I have time I will do those things later,) but this article has reliable sources and the subject is notable. After all, notability is based off of the existence of sources, not just the ones in the article. It's also a non-profit, not really a company. Here we go: [3][4][5][6][7][8] (Primary, non independent source), [9][10][11][12][13][14]. In essence, this is a data collection non profit for the insurance industry, and its relatively influential and important. Clearly passes the WP:GNG and the WP:NORG guidelines. In the future, please conduct an adequate WP:BEFORE check. --AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - AnonymousScholar49 is correct, that there exist some good sources that someone could add to the article, e.g. US Bureau of Labor Statistics and Insurance Journal are legit. As for this being a non-profit, I don't know about that. It is described as "a U.S. insurance rating and data collection bureau specializing in workers' compensation. Operating with a not-for-profit philosophy and owned by its member insurers...". I'm not sure why this is important but merely responding to Anon.--FeralOink (talk) 21:41, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:11, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per WP:HEY, I’ve cleaned up the article and added WP:RS sources from the U.S. Department of Labor, Reuters, and Insurance Journal (2). Promotional and unsourced content has been removed or, where appropriate, clearly tagged. The article now meets WP:THREE and satisfies notability under WP:GNG. HerBauhaus (talk) 09:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fintilect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software company. Routine coverage like M&As, renaming, investments, are not enough to pass WP:CORPDEPTH. UPE history is another issue. Gheus (talk) 09:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Turkey. Shellwood (talk) 10:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Software, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after article rescue work (again). Any recent UPE work (if that's what it was) had already been reverted by the nominator. Restore former material of historical interest, e.g. OS/2 software as highlighted in the previous AFD. – Fayenatic London 13:39, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I haven't found anything outside of primary sources and routine business announcements. Many sources are "fintech" focused and I tend to view such sources with the same skepticism as crypto focused sites. I haven't found much in the way of notability for the previous iterations of the company either. The sources on the historic article don't seem to meet reliability or notability requirements either. The old page seems like a relic of a more lenient era of wikipedia. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 21:59, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Is not notable and does not have wide coverage in RS. Reads like a promotion. Ramos1990 (talk) 00:54, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cinder painter (talk) 06:05, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HilssaMansen19 (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]