Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools

WP:SDEL

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Schools. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Schools|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Schools. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

Purge page cache

watch

Primary and secondary schools

Global Institute of Technology & Management, Gurgaon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an educational institution, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for educational institutions. As always, educational institutions are not automatically entitled to have articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to have WP:GNG-worthy third party coverage about them -- but this is "referenced" entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, with not even one reliable or GNG-building source shown at all.
It also warrants note that a WP:SPA with a direct conflict of interest ("Gitm" right in their username) recently tried to rewrite this as a highly advertorialized promotional spiel that was overflowing with superfluous bolding of practically every word -- but even after reverting back to the version that existed before Monday, there's still some advertorialism ("GITM offer the best transport service to the student" -- best according to what objective third party source unaffiliated with the institution's PR department?) lurking in it.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt the institution from having to cite any reliable sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and India. Bearcat (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This institute also lacks WP:SIGCOV, and I also think it is Non Notable. It fails to meet WP:NSCHOOL and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES.VeritasVanguard ☎ 15:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bearcat The mentioned user, Gitmfarrukhanagr has been blocked indefinitely for edits you mentioned. VeritasVanguard☎ 00:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:05, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't find sources to meet GNG. Still reads somewhat like an advertisement. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 23:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough news coverage as per the notability guidelines.Almandavi (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Narain College of Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is little to no independent sources to establish notability. Also most of it reads like WP:PROMO Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 22:43, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management, Schools, Engineering, Technology, and Madhya Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: In as much as there are multiple issues on this article, I suggest a clean up and proper citation, as an educational institution, Primary source could be considered, article needs clean up in content and references but let’s give this article a chance. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 21:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Clarksville Christian School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing a WP:GNG pass for this private school in Tennessee. Sources are:

The school's own publications/websites/channels and thus not independent ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6])
Online directory/database pages ([7], [8], [9], [10], [11])
Regurgitated press releases (article, identical release, [12])
An article in the Christian Chronicle, which is affiliated with the school's denomination and thus not independent.
A random link that doesn't validate the claim it purports to.
A WP:TRIVIALMENTION on the school's accreditor (and thus not independent) [13]
Other WP:PRIMARYSOURCES: [14], [15].

I didn't find any other GNG-qualifying sources in my WP:BEFORE search. The page creator unilaterally removed maintenance tags for notability, promotional language and third-party sourcing without coming close to addressing the problems, so rather than edit-war over a tag, I am going to AfD as the next step. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Christianity, and Tennessee. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While I acknowledge that many of the currently cited sources are affiliated with the school or its denomination, there are also independent, reliable local media sources covering Clarksville Christian School that demonstrate its notability. For example, Clarksville Now and The Leaf-Chronicle have reported on CCS’s accreditation milestones, scholarship achievements, and athletics, providing substantive coverage beyond routine directory listings or press releases. Additionally, local news outlets have covered CCS events and student accomplishments in a way that goes beyond trivial mention.

I am actively working to incorporate these independent third-party sources into the article to strengthen its verifiability and comply with WP:GNG. I respectfully request additional time to improve the article with these reliable sources before any deletion actions are taken. GatewayPolitics (talk) 03:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also you could have taken these concerns to my talk page before taking this step. GatewayPolitics (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(You could also have taken your perspective to a talk page before unilaterally removing the maintenance tags on a page you created. Your removal of them is what prompted me to do a WP:BEFORE search that turned up no qualifying sources.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles I saw in my BEFORE search; they all appear to be based on or just reprints of press releases from the school. I have not seen anything that constitutes WP:SIGCOV in an independent, reliable, and secondary source. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I hear what you’re saying about the sources, and I understand the importance of meeting WP:SIGCOV. That said, I think tagging or taking further steps without any prior discussion — especially when some effort was clearly made to include sources — feels a bit premature. A quick note on the talk page could’ve opened the door for collaboration rather than escalation. I’m still open to improving the sourcing if better material exists, but I think we should be careful not to rush into cleanup actions without first giving editors a chance to respond. GatewayPolitics (talk) 03:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion discussions run 7 days so you have plenty of time. If you supply sources that pass the test of GNG, the page will be kept. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:19, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dclemens1971 I have cleaned it up. Any other things that need to be changed? GatewayPolitics (talk) 03:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't see any sources that support notability. The Clarksville Now piece appears to be based on a pair of press releases from the school ([16], [17]) and the Leaf-Chronicle link is to a "subscribe" page. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I changed it a bit more and I believe that the article is good and is notable enough. I will have to see other opinions, and will respect the outcome. GatewayPolitics (talk) 04:04, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would say the Leaf-Chronicle article is independent WP:SIGCOV of the school but the Austin Peay State University piece isn't; it's focused on its alumnus Hassell and trivially mentions the school. That's one source toward GNG; remember, we need multiple GNG-qualifying sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - the page creator has requested additional time to source the article, so it can be done in draft space and then submitted to Articles for Creation when it is ready. Stockhausenfan (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify - I support allowing the editor time and space to get this article in shape. — Maile (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

T & T High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon a WP:BEFORE search and by also analyzing the article's current sources, I see no reliable, significant secondary coverage found about the school (per WP:GNG), which means that there is no real reason to assume that the school warrants its own article. Article has already been PROD'd before and contested back in 2015, which means that AfD is the only option available here. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Asia, and Bangladesh. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. Mehedi Abedin 02:34, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Run of the mill school without significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shree Holy Family Higher Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single primary Source. No other significant online coverage available in independent sources. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Nepal. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not finding Significant coverage for the subject on a brief web search so far, alternatively can be draftified if new sources can be found.Lorraine Crane (talk) 18:21, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance High School (Kenya)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highschools are no longer considered to be inherently notable. This one fails WP:NSCHOOL. Referencing is abysmal. This is a WP:ROTM high school. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Kenya. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My History

The History of the Alliance High School

J. Stephen smith published in 1973 would make a perfect reference 2C0F:FE38:2405:1F31:45CD:3778:2835:9D13 (talk) 04:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
keep 99 years old Alliance High School in Kenya is not just any high school: it is the first in the country to offer education to African (boys) [18] and as such, has an important historical role. Its educational content and its influence on Ngugi wa Thiong'o (recently deceased) is analyzed at length in article Ngugi's Colonial Education: “The Subversion… of the African Mind” (2014)" from the perspective of colonial education. It relies on numerous sources, of which "Carey Francis at the A.H.S., Kikuyu", from Kipkurir B.E.Biographical Essays on Imperialism and Collaboration in Colonial Kenya and numerous issues of The ASH Magazine. If The Alliance High School and the origins of the Kenya Africa Elite, 1926-1962 is still unpublished [19], The history of the Alliance High School (1973) is still in libraries. --Pa2chant.bis (talk) 07:56, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wilmette Junior High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed redirect (with a personal attack). Non-notable primary school. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:14, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "with a personal attack"? I see here that you replaced the entire article with a redirect and were called out for vandalism by another user. Caeryllium (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Calling something vandalism, when it isn't, is a personal attack. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Wilmette Public Schools District 39. I found these [20] [21] [22], but I find it unlikely that they add up to establish notability per WP:NSCHOOL or are enough for a fulfilling encyclopedic article. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 19:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why judge whether or not the article is fulfilling enough for an encyclopedic article? Your decision seems awfully speculative, and I think it's worth noting that this wikipedia page is being worked on by a few friends as a project. Why can't we construct it first and see if it's enough to be an encyclopedic article? What's the harm in waiting? Caeryllium (talk) 03:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All content in an article should be based on a collection of reliable sources that prove that the subject is notable, meaning that those sources must prove why it's significantly different from other schools which makes it worthy of an article. So far, two of the article's sources provide run-of-the-mill facts or statistics, and the other is a primary source. From the sources that I've found from scowering the internet, I've deduced that there is simply not enough information from sources to make a good article. We can perhaps include that information in the school district's article, which is why I !voted merge and not delete, but it probably won't stand on its own. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 03:23, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - to the school district per above. WP:GNG is clearly not met, and that's not surprising as lower schools seldom do. Rather than deletion, if possible we should always try to find an alternative. For US public schools, that's generally a redirect to the school district. This is the longstanding practice for less than notable public schools. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 22:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. Middle, intermediate, and junior high schools are rarely notable by themselves. An exception might include a school with an especially notable teacher, alumnus, or program. Bearian (talk) 04:34, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Olof Palme Primary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill elementary school. Some minor local coverage but nothing establishing notability. — Moriwen (talk) 15:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and South Africa. — Moriwen (talk) 15:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cheboksary Physics and Mathematics School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is entirely unreferenced save for a link to what seems to be some sort of a social networking site in the external links section. I could not find any sources in Chuvash or Russian, that were not simply databases or mentions of the subject in passing. As it stands, this article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 23:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Russia. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 23:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unreferenced and closed means that it is unlikely to be able to be saved. Bearian (talk) 00:51, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article is unreferenced; there is no sigcov online that I can see; there is no clear path to the article being saved in any way. JacobTheRox (talk) 14:24, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jhalakathi Government High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School does not appear to be notable upon search. The current sources in the article only prove that the school exists, and upon search, I can't seem to find any sources that would prove the subject is notable enough to warrant its own article. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I found three independent, reliable sources containing significant coverage of the school.[23][24][25] The history section of the school website suggests some events for which additional coverage likely exists offline: establishment in 1872, nationalization in 1909, the loss of the school building to river erosion, the construction of a new building in 1974, and the 100th anniversary celebration in 2008. If there is no appetite to keep, the article should at a minimum be merged to Jhalokati Sadar Upazila#Education as an alternative to deletion. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The references you provided are not from reliable resources. B-Factor 15:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@B-Factor: What makes you think that Jagonews24.com and Somoy TV are not reliable? Searching books.google.com for "jagonews24" and "somoynews" shows that they're cited by a variety of academic books, indicating a pass of WP:USEBYOTHERS. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not pass WP:NORG as there are no WP:RS to support. References used in the article are primary and not reliable. B-Factor 15:45, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rangamati Government High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon search, I don't think that the school is notable enough to warrant a standalone article. As far as my search, I don't see any reliable, secondary coverage, and the current state of the article also primarily cites their own website. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bangladesh. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Usually Bangladeshi education institutions in the Chittagong Hill Tracts does not have secondary coverage. Education institute outside Dhaka are usually area-wise popular. Like this one is a well-known in Rangamati. Additionally, this is the first & oldest school in CHT. Notable alumnis also studied here. WinKyaw (talk) 15:20, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The school doesn't have secondary, reliable coverage though, as you said in your reply. As @Hannes Röst said, just because a school exists, it does not automatically confer any notability onto the school. The school needs to be notable enough to warrant its own article, and the school clearly does not pass WP:NSCHOOL at this very moment. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 03:13, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It seems to be one of the 64 government high schools located in the 64 districts of Bangladesh. The locals reckon that these schools are quite the talk of the region within their respective districts. Somajyoti ✉ 16:35, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete there is no indication of passing WP:NSCHOOL, there are no secondary sources that I could find in books that go beyond trivial coverage. There are some sources on a formar headmaster but mentions the school in one line. The arguments of User talk:Somajyoti and User:Win Kyaw boil down to WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST which is not sufficient. Similarly the fact that notable alumni have studied here does not make the school notable by itself. @User talk:Somajyoti and @User:Win Kyaw, please see this RFC which was discussed in great length and concludes that High schools are not inherently noteable and that reliable independent WP:SIGCOV needs to exist for them as well, which I dont see here. There simply isnt any coverage that we could use to write an article. --hroest 20:27, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet WP:SIGCOV, and has no relevance in the broad encyclopedic perspective, not passes WP:NSCHOOL. Simply, if a school is known in local area (most probably by students and their guardians), it is not encyclopedic. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 10:02, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rangamati Sadar Upazila#Education, where this school is located and where it is mentioned, as an alternative to deletion. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:54, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Loyola Jesuit College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to lack WP:SIGCOV and has had WP:PROMO edits. In WP:BEFORE did not find reliable sources such that WP:GNG fails here. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Christianity, and Nigeria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very week keep The promo in the past is true but I think the school barely makes the cut. Google used to be bad in covering African news sources in their indexing process but I don't know if that is still the case. If so, there should be untapped sources available on paper but not on the internet. The Banner talk 11:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I can find in my Wikipedia:BEFORE. If you find enough for coverage, I could withdraw my nomination, but I did not find much on this "college". Iljhgtn (talk) 18:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks the notability required by the general notability rules. No sign of notability and no good media sources could be found.--Amlikdi (talk) 07:08, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Check the References list now. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not think this meets the WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV, we would need more sources to bolster inclusion. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Check the article now please. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:59, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
keep this case is different from all the other WP:ROTM local high schools, according to local sources this is one of the top (or the top) schools in the country. See this report in Business Day and this source linked in the article [26]. There is some coverage in this book spanning almost a full page 282. Given the amount of coverage available online and its clear standing locally, as well as all the coverage about the plane crash, this should pass WP:NSCHOOL. --hroest 20:43, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"report in Business Day"? That is a weak listicle at best. Not notable. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:57, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: I think it is better that editors mention that they did no BEFORE on an article than saying suh when nothing was done. I was just looking at these mountain of sources: on Google Scholar, Google books, Archived newspapers, and news websites. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:24, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those are not sources ABOUT the college, but are mere passing mentions in some academic citations. Nothing in your so called "mountain of source" [sic] makes this notable. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:55, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Iljhgtn, please show me the sources that are not reliable or independent. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:41, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looked at them again, tell me please which of them ARE in fact good for establishing notability as reliable and independent! There is no way this article passes GNG. and it has NOT been "greatly improved since...nomination" at all. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:37, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article has been greatly improved since its nomination, to pass WP:ORGCRIT and meet WP:GNG. King ChristLike (talk) 05:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is simply not true... more junk has been added, but it has not been improved or made notable. Look at the sources. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – robertsky (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 04:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: The article doesn't seem to violate WP:PROMO as a whole, and it seems to have enough content and references to merit keeping it. The issue is there isn't much legitimate notability, a simple google search leads to less than 1 page of results. Ashwin060 (talk) 23:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Universities and colleges

Sardar Vallabhbhai Global University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. Sources are primary, press releases or passing mentions. No In depth coverage in independent media. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics:Organizations, India, and Gujarat. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:59, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dismiss. This a page for academics not for universities. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]
I have updated. Plz have a look. Rahmatula786 (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GCS Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A straightforward WP:PROMO article and doesn't meet the WP:NHOSPITAL guidelines. Either redirect to Ahmedabad#Hospitals or Gujarat University. Charlie (talk) 07:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Gujarat. Charlie (talk) 07:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Medicine. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:31, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is completely unsourced and reads like pure promotion. It falls well short of meeting WP:NHOSPITAL.Jitendra indulkar (talk) 08:36, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lord Krishna College of Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to salvage here. It uses only primary sources. Whatever sources are available online are mere trivial mention. So this cannot be merged as well. I would suggest a deletion or a redirect to List of colleges affiliated to the Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect/merge to LNCT University - seems the institution is actually LNCT (Bhopal) Indore Campus per [27], as the address matches there, and primary links on LKCE article are actually with LNCT. No apparent indication that this is (directly) connected to Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow Dl2000 (talk) 21:38, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LNCT does not seem notable either. I have nominated it for an AfD as well Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 15:55, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, Engineering, and Madhya Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:20, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete there doesnt seem to be SIGCOV. --hroest 19:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different Redirect target articles are suggested, one of which is also at AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:58, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Selale University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undisclosed paid editing/conflict of interest fails WP:NORG. Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Ethiopia. Shellwood (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a public university, not a paid promotion. Which parts raised concerns about undisclosed paid editing or conflict of interest? But I can go ahead and blank it out, if it makes you happy. Wieditor25 (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Being a public university, and paid promotion, are not mutually exclusive. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:51, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

False accuse- Not paid! Wieditor25 (talk) 16:14, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A government source, the university's own website (which throws up a secure connexion failed error) and some routine coverage. Nothing here is any good. Wieditor25 has attemped to canvass this discussion on the Teahouse. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 18:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep public Universities are generally presumed notable, even though here there isnt a ton of secondary coverage we can at least establish that this University exists and trains students. The article is in reasonable shape and has sources, we can improve COI issues but I simply dont see a reason to delete this. --hroest 14:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No they aren't. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 15:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – robertsky (talk) 08:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 14:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment Public universities are usually found (but not presumed) notable, because they are large, often old organisations with publication output and a public profile. They need to meet WP:GNG. This one doesn't, but it is not wholly invisible. There are news reports like this one [28] which won't do for writing the article. It gets passing mentions in a few books etc. May just be TOOSOON becaue it is very new and is also very small for a university. Can we find a redirect target as an ATD? I was going to !vote as a weak delete, but I'd rather find a merge or redirect target. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 17:09, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Founded nine years ago, it's not surprising that there's not a lot of coverage. Since this university only has undergraduate degrees, it's what would probably be called an agricultural and technical college in the United States. They were, before the Covid-19 pandemic, planning on adding graduate degrees, but there's no evidence that it's happening. They have had, as far as I can see online, a single research paper published. There are a few news items on Google news. So I'm leaning towards a keep. Bearian (talk) 22:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

School or university organisations proposed for deletion

Taylors Lakes Secondary College (via WP:PROD on 20 March 2025)

To check articles which are being proposed for deletion search by date at Category:Proposed deletion or see the summary of PRODs at User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary. It is common to find schools of all types on this list.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools

Primary and secondary schools

Global Institute of Technology & Management, Gurgaon

Lakshmi Narain College of Technology

Clarksville Christian School

T & T High School

Shree Holy Family Higher Secondary School

Alliance High School (Kenya)

Wilmette Junior High School

Olof Palme Primary School

Cheboksary Physics and Mathematics School

Jhalakathi Government High School

Rangamati Government High School

Loyola Jesuit College

Universities and colleges

Sardar Vallabhbhai Global University

GCS Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre

Lord Krishna College of Engineering

Selale University

Other school or university articles

Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies

School or university organisations proposed for deletion