Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Philippines

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Philippines. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Philippines|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Philippines. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Philippines/archive

Purge page cache

watch

See also: Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines

Philippines

Bernardo T. Chua

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has lacked sufficient independent sources for a number of years. Appears known only for multi-level-marketing invesigrations, and no real WP:SIGCOV. ZimZalaBim ^talk 22:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Thanks, ZimZalaBim for notifying me. I see I did make one substantial edit to this article. It was in relation to Gano Excel, Organo Gold, Direct Selling Association and Vemma—as relates to the Italian government finding Vemma was a pyramid scheme, and Chua was part of it. Whether Chua is wiki-level notable himself, or not, I think there's enough notability for the companies. Since the Chua BLP existed already, it was the article I stuffed the content into. I wouldn't mind if the content was stowed somewhere else and the redirects changed accordingly. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 02:25, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Food and drink, Philippines, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DV Boer Controversy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Shakily sourced controversy article; creating editor was blocked from editing Bagong Henerasyon (along with everyone else for now) for adding undue weight and poor Reddit-based blog sourcing about a minor controversy involving that organization, so they're taking their grievances to any other article related to BH they can find and creating what reads here as an unbalanced attack page (originally titled DV Boer Scam) against the organization using this company's issues to COATRACK about BH and related organizations, along with Roberto Gerard Nazal Jr.. Nathannah • 📮 23:16, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Crime, Politics, Companies, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: For what it's worth (which isn't much), it would appear that DV Boer itself has no article — just this one about the controversy surrounding it. (Granted, it probably isn't impossible for an otherwise non-notable company to still have notable controversies; I offer no opinion as to whether that is the case here.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:50, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did take that in mind in nominating this; if there was a company article to redirect to I would not send this here, but straight off it's just an immediate attack with no context outside 'company bad', along with them trying to shove their view of BH anywhere they can. Nathannah • 📮 03:04, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find any information about the company beyond its probably links to the Members Church of God International by MCGI Exiters group. While personally I could sympathize their cause, it remains a fringe movement which have not or will probably not be picked up by the mainstream media outlets which would have helped establish WP:SIGCOV. However, alas Wikipedia ultimately not a place to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify -- this seems to me to be more appropriate than AfD (but now we should wait for concensus). The article starts with material on DVD Boer, but then wanders off topic to criticise politics involving Villamin & Nazal. Independent of any notability question, NPOV is definitely unclear. While there might be an article that should be written on the DV Boer topic, this is not what we should have on WP IMHO. Ldm1954 (talk) 10:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Gerard Nazal Jr.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly-sourced attack page for a Fillipino figure bludgeoned through the draft process (see also Draft:Robert Nazal and Draft:Roberto Gerard L. Nazal Jr.); creating editor was blocked from editing Bagong Henerasyon (along with everyone else for now) for adding undue weight and poor Reddit-based blog sourcing about a minor controversy involving that organization involving this person, so they're trying to wedge it into other articles to push their fringe viewpoint. This is otherwise a gossip/attack page for a figure with little to no WP:N already reverted on several pages before. I also suspect this page was created with LLM assistance going by its formatting. Nathannah • 📮 23:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the congressman/businessman has sufficient coverage and controversy (outside the fringe MCGI-related controversies the author has pushed). Hopefully I have salvaged the article enough. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:44, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Subject passes WP:NPOL as a member of the Philippines congress. Attack elements have been WP:HEYed by Hariboneagle927. Curbon7 (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, passes WP:NPOL having served in the House of Representatives of the Philippines from 2022 to 2024. On that alone, he passes, but I caution naming him as a congressman-elect as his party still has an unresolved disqualification case, and he might even have one on his own. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. but we should monitor the article as there was just a recent Philippine election. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:50, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but watch closely. Bearian (talk) 04:25, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: It was passed on WP:NPOL since he's have politics background. It passed also on GNG, just monitor this article closely. ROY is WAR Talk! 11:33, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not quite related to the subject's notability, but can Hariboneagle927 and possibly other people who'd think of doing the same, to not add WP:BLPPRIMARY sources (such as COMELEC documents) to the article in regards to BLP information (birthdates, addresses, etc.)? The only possible exception is for it to be used as a secondary source (or as a backup) to another WP:RS source, but as a source to itself, it cannot be used. Please do not use those not just on this article, but on any other articles; it should be removed on sight on other articles. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:44, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

EduAKsyon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, electoral organization that failed to win at least one of the possible three seats in congress. Two citations are: A opinion poll native advertising highlighting EduAKsyon as one of the preferred partylist groups (even if it just placed 20th) and the group's contact us page. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 01:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 01:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, while not "too soon", this party does not pass WP:GNG. Howard the Duck (talk) 20:44, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable --Lenticel ^(talk) 21:19, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aksyon Dapat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, electoral organization that failed to win at least one of the possible three seats in congress. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 01:18, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 01:18, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:53, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I fail to see how this is "too soon", as the election itself just happened. Sports teams are not sent to AFD as "too soon" if they haven't won a championship yet. Care to send Minnesota Timberwolves to AFD (LOL)? There's one WP:RS used on this article. WP:GNG does not mention how many WP:RS there should be, but this has one. Howard the Duck (talk)

Comment There is nothing much to write about the partylist besides "they ran". Whats up with the double dtandard at 1Munti Partylist's deletion nomination where you do note it didnt win any seats (but to be fair you did not vote gor or against its deletion) and EduAKsyon. Was it because this party is somehow connected to Aksyon Demokratiko (an assertation which seems to be made through an assumption of its founder, Bobbit Roco being a former president). Please at least make it clear why is this any different. I might have overlooked something Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:57, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think WP:NPOSSIBLE will save this article. A partylist especially a recently established one isn't usually covered by in real life publications either. So the typical sourcing would be news articles (supplemented by the partylist website if ever) Hariboneagle927 (talk) 03:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As explained above, this has one WP:RS covering it therefore passing WP:SIGCOV. The others didn't. 1Munti Partylist is a borderline case as it is related to the One Muntinlupa party and if it's the same organization one can argue that it if someone finds WP:RS that passes WP:SIGCOV then it has the same situation as this one. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elena 1944

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence film has entered main production, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 17:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:17, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Olivia Lamasan. I know that directors can change, but Lamasan appears to be the main driving force behind this. Like you said, I don't see where filming has started on this. I see brief mentions that it's planned and it's supposedly going to release later this year, but there's no confirmation of filming. Even without the confirmation the coverage for this is pretty light. I've done some cleaning of the director's page (it was a bit promotional) and included a general mention of this movie - it can be redirected to her career section. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donn Favis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to pass WP:NPOL as an unelected member to a national body, and city council position is not inherently notable. Coverage all focuses on either failed congressional campaign or general coverage of the Marikina City Council. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 18:24, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify and redirect to Marikina#Local government: Still a major figure in local politics; gaining notability in the foreseeable future is not out of the equation. On a related note, if that is the threshold, then Xyza Diazen should also be rediscussed.

TofuMuncher (talk) 18:29, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TofuMuncher if you want to take action on that page you can. Politicians have notability requirements, where if they hold a certain position they can be considered automatically notable, but they can still be notable if they have been the subject of significant coverage. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 19:06, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Legaspi family

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this family has several individual notable members, the family itself is not notable. Nothing here that's not better covered in the articles for individual people. — Moriwen (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Philippines. — Moriwen (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
point taken @Moriwen but i find it relevant to show the lineage of Legaspi family. They are one of the prominent family of in the line of actors in the Philippines that had been in the entertainment industry for over 70 decades and their children and great-grand children are also actors and entertainers.

But if you and others find that it is necessary to delete the page, i gladly welcome it. Fanblade81 (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think Legaspi (surname) is enough for these entries. HueMan1 (talk) 04:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate crinkle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this page yesterday refbombed with recipe blogs. I looked for better sources to replace them and could only find two sources with sigcov: Metroscene mag and Field Guide to Cookies. I've since looked closer at Metroscene Mag and see they identify as a blog, leaving only one source contributing to GNG.
ATDs: (1) Redirect to Filipino cuisine where they are mentioned. An expansion would give undue weight, they do not appear particularly important to Filipino cuisine. (2) Merge to Filipino-American cuisine: I disapprove of this. The article is currently scoped to Filipino food in America (i.e. food of Filipino Americans) and would be out of scope. (3) Redirect to list of cookies: Oppose a merge as the criteria for inclusion is implicitly "meets GNG". Rollinginhisgrave (talk | contributions) 05:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philippines and Minnesota. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this one, but it's only just on that side of the minimum threshold. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 13:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. MaPhilIndo (talk) 23:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maloi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BANDMEMBER, no evidence of notability outside her group. Page should go back to Maloi (disambiguation). orangesclub 🍊 00:20, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Philippines. orangesclub 🍊 00:20, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Dance. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think we can consider the discography of Maloi since she's had contribution on the song Kinikilig on Bini which is technically under WP:COMPOSER, there is also a single "Here With You" with Gwen under WP:SINGER and have a Filmography outside Bini which is Dilaw by Filipino singer Maki which is Maloi was a cast on the music video, she also appeared on "RomCom" by Filipino singer Rob Deniel. Also, Maloi have an interview with Vogue Philippines and it is still technically outside Bini. ROY is WAR Talk! 07:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COMPOSER describes writing a notable piece of work, not being one of five songwriters on a single b-side song that does not have an article itself nor did it reach any charts, let alone make any noticeable mark in later compositions. Also "Here with you" did not fulfil the WP:SINGER requirement of reaching any charts either. The interview with Vogue Philippines is a good start for her but WP:SINGER describes multiple, non-trivial, published works and this is a single interview. It's too early in her career to have an entire article for her. orangesclub 🍊 10:46, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not really too early, it can be expand the article in the future since the eight girls have some activities outside their group, not always but sometimes have activities have a own appearence like TV Show, Music Video, Magazine that sometimes are not covered here because of unreliable sources per guidelines of BLP. (Same argument to Gwen. There are many similar cases of BLPs are not qualified on WP:BANDMEMBER (like me as a page reviewer) but they are based on the WP:GNG to be more qualified and it can be expandable in the future that's why they don't want to nom in AfD. Also, the supporters know that the 8 separate articles and reading this article (also to Gwen that you nominate to AfD), and they promoting to read the wiki article. This is not Conflict of Interest or being a fan, i'm just neutral here and this is my observation that's why we don't touch this 8 article to nominate in AfD. As you can see in the history, July 24, 2024 to May 2, 2025 have significant improvement on the article.

Note: The 8 separate articles of girls are not qualified in WP:BANDMEMBER, we have a argument on Jhoanna that they want to AfD because of not qualified, but it obviously passed in WP:GNG.

So, I don't think it'll succeed to the AfD (per my experience) but i'll leave to the some editors who wants to participate. ROY is WAR Talk! 22:24, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can see that the article has been expanded but still not enough to demonstrate her notability outside of being in her group. The point of WP:BANDMEMBER is that if you removed Bini, she has a single writing credit, a single non-charting soundtrack song and two music vidoes, and that wouldn't be enough to justify a non-Bini member having a dedicated article, so why would it be enough for her? orangesclub 🍊 22:52, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We've some BLPs Filipino girl groups that supposed not to be in the article like Charlotte Secretario, member of filipino girl group Kaia which is obviously tag as {{notability}} same as Katya Santos of Viva Hot Babes, a filipino pop music girl group. The bottom line that they are not basis on WP:BANDMEMBER it also applies on WP:GNG. If we always basis on WP:BANDMEMBER only and not GNG, some separate BLPs girl/boy groups that in this wikipedia will also in AfD, maybe a thousand articles will affected on that basis. Some of them separate are we are really don't care on WP:BANDMEMBER, as long as they are passed on WP:GNG then it is good or it can tag on notability in music instead of afd. ROY is WAR Talk! 03:22, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We're going in circles here, and I'm really not sure the relevance of these other articles you've shared. WP:BANDMEMBER means that if someone isn't individually meeting WP:GNG, being in a band doesn't cross them over the line. I still don't see how Maloi passes WP:GNG, WP:SINGER or WP:COMPOSER - being a member of a popular girl group isn't listed on any of those guidelines. orangesclub 🍊 04:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Katya Santos is an established actress on her own right. Her Viva Hot Babes stint was more of a side project for her. She gave credence (if you can call it that) to the Viva Hot Babes, not the other way around. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:36, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Howard the Duck, D.18th, and AstrooKai: Pinging other users who were involved in this discussion at Talk:Bini (group)#Requested move 29 January 2025.

*Delete: It doesn't take much for band member notability; just two-three elaborate facts about specifically their solo career (or career with more than one band/group). Like with Joey_Mazzola who has credits outside of Sponge and barely passes for notability. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 05:55, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since I am one of the significant contributors to this group, I believe it is in the best interest of fairness that I refrain from participating in these AfDs to avoid perceived bias. I will leave the decision to the community and respect whatever outcome the nominations lead to. AstrooKai (Talk) 06:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Her "notability" is defined solely by being a member of Bini; beyond that, there's really not much else about her. At least each member of, say, the Spice Girls, is notable for other endeavours other than being a part of an all-girl pop group. For one, Victoria Beckham is well known not merely for being David Beckham's wife but also for her contributions to the fashion industry. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 09:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I checked here and it says I've contributed to 7.7% of the article. I don't know if that makes me a significant contributor or not. But I do want to say that if you Google her name ("Maloi") and click on the News tab, it shows a looooot of solo articles. Nylon Manila (which is a reliable source, as it's simply the Philippine version of the established magazine Nylon) alone has at least 3 articles that significantly mention Maloi, two of which are dedicated to her alone:

https://nylonmanila.com/pop-culture/bini-maloi-broke-the-internet/

https://nylonmanila.com/beauty/bini-maloi-ricalde-radiating-light-feminine-energy/

I would say that she definitely meets Notability criteria, but this article just needs those sources to be added soon. Maloi made one statement clarifying that she wasn't dating Rico Blanco and multiple articles from multiple reliable sources such as Manila Bulletin were written about THAT singular statement. That, to me, is undeniably a notable figure. Give editors a chance to add more of those sources. Bloomagiliw (talk) 18:25, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those Nylon articles start with "Maloi Ricalde from BINI" and "BINI’s Maloi". That's all there is to it about this person's notability. I know the Philippines is in a learning crisis right now, but WP:BANDMEMBER is clear and should be undersatood by sixth grader: "Members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability." Delete, move Maloi (disambiguation) to Maloi, then have this person as an entry on the dab page. Howard the Duck (talk) 19:56, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very professional and impartial remark: "I know the Philippines is in a learning crisis right now".... :)

Those articles mention that she is a member of BINI, just like how many articles about actors mention what else they're known for as well. But those articles are very clearly about MALOI ONLY. For instance, all articles about Jhoanna's stint as Eds in Tabing Ilog: the Musical, the lead role in a major musical that she played in two runs, also mention that she is a member of BINI.

Unless you are equipped to talk about this without insulting other editors and resorting to personal attacks, don't talk about it. "Undersatood," Howard the Duck? Bloomagiliw (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangesclub, @Bloomagiliw just added some information that could be passed on WP:GNG, you're just focusing on WP:BANDMEMBER. It's just a baseless argument if you are only focusing on WP:BANDMEBER. And I would like to request a Relist or Restart the voting because the article have added some information that can be changes to the vote or not. My basis here on Talk:Jhoanna#Requested move 31 July 2024. Also, Maloi was in the top 100 female idols, in a nomination on notable award of Top 100 on X (formerly Twitter) which is here and Bini Mikha was the number one.ROY is WAR Talk! 09:09, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloomagiliw:, WP:Competence is required. Until you display this, I have no problem bringing this up. While you have absolutely no right by yourself on restricting other people on discussions, you always bring this to the appropriate drama board (I guess WP:AN/I?)

Again, that the Philippines is an deep learning crisis is on full display here, and that's very sad to see. The articles you had specifically used to demonstrate Malois supposed independent notability outside Bini introduce her as someone from Bini. It's not even "singer Maloi", or even "band member Maloi", but "Maloi Ricalde from BINI" and "BINI’s Maloi". Based on the sources you had specifically used, Her notability stems from Bini. She fails WP:BANDMEMBER.

WP:OSE: Please stop bringing other people not in AFD into arguments. These are not relevant. Those articles are not being discussed here. Be competent and discuss the subject on hand.

Man, are we creating articles for all 100 "top female idols" here at Wikipedia now? How can than be a basis for WP:GNG? Are "top 100 cosplayers", "top 100 high school basketball players", "top 100 Elvis impersonators" should all have articles too? Are those list in the world, in the Philippines or in Metro Manila? I understand you guys are bringing up works outside Bini to demonstrate notability. But really? Appearances in music videos? Top 100 idols? Howard the Duck (talk) 09:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you are really reading the updated article now because this is ad hominem now. It clearly passed in WP:GNG, I already said my arguments and why is she passed in WP:GNG. ROY is WAR Talk! 10:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've displayed competence by singlehandedly writing two articles that were promoted to GA status and helping another get to GA within less than a year of being an editor on Wikipedia. 🙂 How about you? How's that UST article coming along? In the decade plus that you've been an editor, according to your user page, how many articles that you've worked on have retained status higher than B? Do enlighten us.

Apart from resorting to a baseless personal attack and doubling down on it, you have used profanity in another discussion on this article. You are not fit to be a part of this discussion due to your obvious emotional bias. If you can't be calm, don't be here.

Maloi has also been a regular judge on a singing competition and has performed on solo gigs. She's also been recognized as an Internet celebrity by multiple sources — which, per Wikipedia, is a thing. Try to keep up with the times.

Ji-young Yoo is always described as Ji-young Yoo from Freaky Tales, Ji-young Yoo from Expats, and so forth in articles. It does not negate that the articles are solely about Yoo. The linked articles are almost all solely about Maloi. Some effort to wrap your head around how media articles are written rather than insistently invoking the educational crisis would be nice. But if you can't do the bare minimum, I'd really like to ask you to leave this discussion to more level-headed editors. Bloomagiliw (talk) 10:20, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been focused to WP:DYKs for quite some time now. WP:GA is also within WP:DYK tho, but I now prefer expanding or creating new articles, then let other people improve on it. Apparently this says I have 48 DYKs, and I have 1 pending now, so I need 1 more for another shiny barnstar if the total there is right (LOL). Howard the Duck (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The repeated claim that Maloi's notability is "only as a member of BINI" overlooks clear, documented evidence of her solo career. This isn’t opinion — it’s supported by multiple reliable sources like Nylon Manila features, a songwriting credit (WP:COMPOSER) outside BINI, and mainstream media coverage such as Vogue Philippines. These meet the requirements outlined in WP:GNG for individual notability.

Additionally, her filmography includes appearances in music videos outside of BINI’s discography, such as "Dilaw" by Maki and "RomCom" by Rob Deniel, which demonstrate activity independnt of the group. Her interview with Vogue Philippines is another example of coverage focused on her personally, not just the group. I agree that WP:GNG requires significant coverage, not just chart performance, and the available sources show a developing individual profile. This does not dismiss the group association but indicates she’s building her own public presence.

I also want to note that personal attacks don’t contribute constructively to the discussion. This is an objective assessment based on available references and Wikipedia's guidelines.

— AdobongPogi (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As explained (not by me) above, this person does not meet WP:COMPOSER, and we're not creating articles on people who appeared on 2 music videos. Again, the Nylon Manila features introduce her not as "Filipino Singer Maloi" but as "Maloi Ricalde from BINI" and "BINI’s Maloi." Again, people, reading comprehension! Howard the Duck (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is steadily improving thanks to continued contributions, with new sources being added that highlight Maloi's individual visibility. These include her credited roles in music videos beyond group activities, a duet single with another artist, and feature interviews from established publications that focus solely on her experiences and perspectives.

Yes, some features refer to her as "from BINI" — but that's common for emerging artists. What matters is that the coverage exists and centers around her as an individual, not as background to the group. That’s the kind of attention that shows someone is beginning to build their own public identity.

This is not a fan defense it's a fair assessment of the available media coverage and the growing effort to present it neutrally. The article is taking shape with proper references, and deletion at this stage would cut short a productive improvment process. Better to work toward a stronger article than shut down what’s clearly a work in progress. AdobongPogi (talk) 00:20, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. It's also worth noting that Jennie Kim, for example, has abundant solo notability. She has plenty of solo music and was at Cannes for her solo acting role in The Idol. Despite this, if you look at her Wikipedia entry, most of the references — even newer ones from 2024 to this year — still call her "Blackpink's Jennie" or mention Blackpink.

It doesn't negate the fact that the coverage is about Jennie only. Clearly not. She has more than enough individual notability to justify her solo Wikipedia entry's existence. Blackpink is mentioned because she is associated with the group; media features often mention the individual's associations, especially for emerging artists, like you mentioned. But the coverage is about Jennie individually.

The coverage in Maloi's articles is about Maloi individually. The mentions of the group she's associated with do not negate that. Bloomagiliw (talk) 06:55, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning keep, as substantially expanded. BD2412 T 00:45, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 14:35, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my vote to keep. Her page still doesn't have anything about her solo MUSIC career outside of her group, there enough SIGCOV for her as model/actress. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 15:17, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen (singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BANDMEMBER, no indication of notability outside of being in her group. orangesclub 🍊 00:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Music, and Philippines. orangesclub 🍊 00:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, and Television. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:34, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per my argument to Maloi ROY is WAR Talk! 22:48, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bini (group): Per my arguments at the Maloi AFD discussion. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 18:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think "Gwen (singer)" is an appropriate redirect. There may have been several more notable singers named Gwen that are for more notable. Either this is kept (either as a standalone article or as a redirect assuming info on this article is not there at the main Bini article) or deleted, no redirects. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:52, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lxs Dos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Mexican/American artist couple. can't find RSs that establish WP:ARTIST, and given their significant work was produced in the 2010s, such RS should already exist. Cabrils (talk) 00:41, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabrils: I have cited various RSs for LxsDos to prove notability i.e. "primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews, or of an independent and notable work" AND "regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers" per WP:ARTIST. In addition to a New York Times article and other periodicals, LxsDos are also featured in a Routledge Companion published book (cited on the page) and the other is an academic text titled "Exploring the Transnational Neighbourhood: Perspectives on Community-Building, Identity and Belonging." This latter text features an analysis of LxsDos's most notable work and their work is also the book's cover. Very perplexed as to why this is not enough. Is there a minimum amount required? Philomena7 (talk) 01:00, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Philomena7,

Thanks for the information. Perhaps if you can provide WP:THREE that would help? For example, while Lxs Dos are mentioned and quoted in the NYT article, I'm not sure the content is sufficiently substantive to meet the requirement of being the "primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews..." (my emphasis added)...? Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Noted! Thank you for this clarity. I have added another periodical source where it is the main source of the article. I am also new to writing articles, so I am still learning how much secondary source analysis is appropriate within the Wiki article itself. Would you be able to look over my new edits? Philomena7 (talk) 02:11, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Philomena7, that addition helps a lot.

Could you please confirm you do not have a conflict of interest?

Thanks, Cabrils (talk) 05:32, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No conflict of interest! My main motivation is that this article was part of a Wikipedia assignment for a university art history course I was enrolled in, and I dedicated time to learning about my assigned artist, finding sources, and learning Wikipedia’s writing approaches. So I’m invested in the sense that I want to make sure my project (even though I already got my grade for this last year) stays in mainspace. Philomena7 (talk) 12:11, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
P.S I should also add that my grade had nothing to whether or not my article remained in mainspace. Contributing to Wikipedia just became something I was passionate about. Thanks for the input on my edits. Is there anything else I should edit/add? Philomena7 (talk) 12:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Philippines, Mexico, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I added a few sources to the article, which should be enough. Many sources about their sculpture in Coachella 2022. Sources from the New York Times, Cultured Magazine, Pulitzer Center, Los Angeles Daily News, Palm Springs Desert Sun, Press Entreprise. Also from books and a scholarly paper. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cinder painter (talk) 07:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The added sources since nomination are enough to meet GNG in my opinion. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The sources added to the article are more than enough for notability. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 19:34, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYRG

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural AfD following WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 5#DYRG. Duckmather (talk) 00:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. Duckmather (talk) 00:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom 124.104.16.92 (talk) 03:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This IP has been blocked for disruption. Geschichte (talk) 09:18, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, this short page has a complicated recent history and I don't believe it is eligible for a Soft Deletion especially as an editor involved and who cast a "vote" here has been blocked. Can we get some more arguments here? This article was BLAR'd and objected to so Redirection is another option besides Keep and Delete.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is probably the 10th radio or TV station I have seen at AfD this month. Is there any wider effort to address this ?

Czarking0 (talk) 01:33, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You don't know how many times I've clamored for better sources in these Philippines broadcasting pages. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 17:41, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation channels and stations#Defunct stations (needs creation) Station is defunct, there isn't anything else to add outside of that. Nathannah • 📮 16:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Nathannah. Unless sources miraculously appear, this is the only way to go. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 17:41, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above Halley ^{luv Filipino ❤} (Talk) 22:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Gabriel (actress)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet WP:GNG. There is no evidence of significant, independent coverage from reliable sources to establish a lasting impact in the field. Most references appear to be minor news snippets, social media, or self-published material, which do not qualify as substantial verification under Wikipedia's standards. Without additional, credible sources demonstrating notable achievements or career recognition. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 13:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, Lists of people, Business, Philippines, and Spain. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 13:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your claims are demonstrably false. Reverse this unjustified nomination for deletion. You have claimed multiple falsehoods which are against the Community Guidelines of Wikipedia.

To clarify:

List of nationally and internationally distributed news organizations referenced in the article:

- The Inquirer.net

- The Philippine Star

- ABS-CBN News

- the Manila Bulletin

- Mega magazine

- Philstar.com

- PEP. Ph

All sources explicitly note Stacey Gabriel and her notable activities.

---

Meanwhile your claims of "self published" material being used is false. Note an example of it or kindly retract your false claim. If you cannot back up this claim, nor retract it, your submission will be flagged as an abuse of Wikipedia policy.

---

"Without additional, credible sources demonstrating notable achievements or career recognition"

Multiple independent sources outline dozens of TV series episodes Stacey participated in, as well as her participation and placing 1st Runner-Up in the 2024 Miss Universe Philippines competition are noted. This is in addition to her success in the national Binibining Pilipinas pageant.

Are these not notable?

---

"social media"

There are no social media references in this article.

---

Given no evidence to support this unjustified action, reverse this flagrantly unjustified and deceptive nomination for deletion. Mickfir (talk) 16:57, 9 May 2025 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Mickfir (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]

Dear @Mickfir,

I want to clarify that the nomination was made in good faith, based on a review of the article’s current sourcing and in line with WP:GNG and WP:BIO some of the listed sources are reliable, and this Afd only for english version. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 17:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why include false claims that social media and self published material was used as references? There is not a single referenced source that was self published nor any reference to social media. This is a harmful oversight at best and deliberately deceptive at worst.

As for notability... I repeat, dozens of interdependently verified TV Episode performances and multiple national pageants including Miss Universe Philippines as 1st Runner-up. Mickfir (talk) 17:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let me check! WP:AFD is not only for deletion it's a basic procedure to determine whether an article is suitable for Wikipedia. Many contributors will review it and vote, so there's no need to panic just let the contributors decide.𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 17:16, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Let me check" ? You nominated this article for deletion without even checking if the claims you are making against it are true?

Perhaps this article is worth a read: Wikipedia:Don't lie

"basic procedure to determine whether an article is suitable for Wikipedia"

No. Wikipedia best practice clearly indicates that if an article has areas for improvement, the 'Talk' page should be used to suggest edits, or you make the edits yourself.

Nominating an article for deletion based on false claims is a flagrant abuse of Wikipedia recommended practice. Mickfir (talk) 10:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sources like ABS-CBN News, The Philippine Star, Manila Bulletin, and others mentioned by Mickfir are reliable. But some, like IMDb, aren't and should be removed. — doclys (❀) 18:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Most of the claims made by @S-Aura about incorrect sourcing were false - made without even checking them first. The IMDb references have been removed as per the advice @Doclys Mickfir (talk) 10:09, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss_Universe_Philippines_2024. Not seeing her being notable. She did not win the pageant and her acting career does not look like enough for a stand alone article. Ramos1990 (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think we have another skim reader. Shame the wiki community is so full of them. May I respectfully remind the administrator assessing this that this very nomination for deletion was made under false pretenses of nonexistent social media and self published citations. There are none.
Multiple independent sources outline over a dozen TV series episodes Stacey participated in with national distribution, as well as her participation and placing 1st Runner-Up in the 2024 Miss Universe Philippines competition are noted. This is in addition to her success in the national Binibining Pilipinas pageant. This, in addition to a nationally recognized prison ministry program.

Mickfir (talk) 09:22, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 04:36, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note to admin: the comments justifying the original nomination for deletion by @S-Aura contain false claims about the citations of the article. Not only does this invalidate the original AfD nomination but the community members that utilize false claims should be cautioned by admins.

Summary:

Claim: "Most references appear to be ... social media, or self-published material,"

Reality: there were never any such citations. All citations are from nationally, and in some cases internationally distributed news organizations.

This AfD discussion was raised under false pretenses and should therefor be retracted. AfD nominations should not be justified by outright falsehoods. Mickfir (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, No personal attacks WP:NPA.

Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 11:06, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Highlighting that you justified this AfD by making false claims is not a personal attack. Your claims are either correct or false. There is nothing personal. Just accountability. May I ask why you chose to include false information in your AfD nomination? Is not the Wikipedia Community dependent on telling the truth? Wikipedia:Don't lie

Or can you list which citation was from "social media" or "self published"?

There was clearly no such faulty citations. Mickfir (talk) 13:04, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Doclys. Any references deemed questionable can either be replaced by more reliable sources or contested/discussed in the article's talk page, same applies for phrases and sentences that need relevant citations. -Ian Lopez @ 15:53, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific comments about which sources are acceptable/unacceptable and why would be very helpful, including from the nominator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb references have been removed as per the recommendation above. All remaining sources, namely, The Philippine Star (and its sister news outlet Philstar.com), ABS-CBN News, Manila Bulletin, Mega (a fashion and lifestyle magazine owned by AGC Power Holdings Corp., which also owns Vogue Philippines), PEP.ph, Inquirer.net (online arm of The Philippine Daily Inquirer), Rappler, and GMA News Online are trusted media outlets. These sources feature firsthand interviews with Gabriel, transcripts of her live broadcast speeches, and/or notable career news. Firizz (talk) 04:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Santa Cruz, Laguna local elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously tagged as potentially not notable, tag removed from author and author has previously challenged prior PRODs. Nominating other articles that are similar in lack of notability at this discussion. I have done searches on all of these, there is no significant or lasting coverage. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:47, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, let me keep it clear. Why only those? Why is that the only thing you want to delete because it didn't reach Wikipedia Notability, Why? Does the 2010, 2013, 2016, 2019, 2022 and 2025 Marilao local elections, are those reached the Wikipedia's notability to be an article? Those were the only half of the Local elections in the Philippines that's seems didn't reach the Wikipedia notability to be an Article. If you're really concerned, why would y'all questioned those page/s, not only mine, respectively. James100000 (talk) 02:17, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and I did not go through all of them. I had previously nominated those in Majayjay, so checked on the others. I found the Santa Cruz 2007 one through NPP. Those others can most likely be nominated, I can look for information on them tomorrow to see. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 03:03, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think for the better of the doubt instead of deleting those and this page/s, why would we just put the Template:more citations needed? I think that's the better we could do, because all of the Local Election pages in the Philippine politics weren't that important and whatever citations/references i put in the page/s i've created were that, I can't find anyone else, because that's how it is. Local elections are not getting much media attention, most of them are focused on the national election, respectively. James100000 (talk) 03:42, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not getting media attention, then it fails WP:GNG. We can't make election articles solely based on database entries. Our basis of creating articles is only if someone else wrote about it. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:33, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect 2007_Santa_Cruz,_Laguna_local_elections to 2010 Laguna local elections, 2019 Majayjay local elections to 2019 Laguna local elections, and 2022 Majayjay local elections to 2022 Laguna local elections. If "Local elections are not getting much media attention", and our standard is WP:GNG, then at the very least the best that can be done is redirect this to provincial-level elections. Granted 2010 and 2019 election articles leave much to be desired, and perhaps it'll be hard to find WP:RS on 2010 elections now due to WP:LINKROT, but 2019 can still be done, and in 2025, Laguna has the most competitive gubernatorial race in the country. Howard the Duck (talk) 22:43, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 01:37, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. With only an argument to Delete and one to Redirect, there is no consensus here. I'd like to ask User:James100000 what his opinion is as he is the only other editor to comment but failed to "vote".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete These are minor municipal elections, and I don'ty see the redirects since that would be a complete change of subject. Mangoe (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mangoe and Yoblyblob. Too local. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:48, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Majayjay local elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD with promise to improve refs. Added references do not indicate anything more than results or routine coverage Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 01:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not seeing significant coverage here. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 05:21, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 2016 Laguna local elections as per may arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Santa Cruz, Laguna local elections. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:17, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Yoblyblob and JackFromWisconsin. Too local. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 22:49, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Mapandan local elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No cited sources cover the election at much length, and was not able to find much through searching. Election for small municipality of under 40,000, and relies on social media sources Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the page author has placed a comment on this discussion talk page Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all,

I would like to kindly request that the deletion discussion regarding my article be closed. Since the nomination, I have been able to gather and incorporate additional, verifiable information and reliable sources that I believe significantly improve the article’s notability and overall quality.

I understand and appreciate the community’s concerns raised earlier. However, with the newly added sources and updates, I believe the article now better meets Wikipedia's inclusion standards. I am fully open to further suggestions for improvement and am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s content and sourcing guidelines moving forward.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards, IJeskanEditorV1 IJeskanEditorV1 (talk) 07:58, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:48, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 2025 Laguna local elections as per may arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Santa Cruz, Laguna local elections. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Howard the Duck, Mapandan is in Pangasinan. HueMan1 (talk) 00:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2025 Pangasinan local elections, then. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:37, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 2025 Pangasinan local elections. 2600:8806:2A05:1100:1097:AFF5:4FE9:E15F (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on the changes since the nomination?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 05:01, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles proposed for deletion (WP:PROD)

Shampoo Ni Lola (via WP:PROD on 21 March 2025)
Flag of Cagayan (via WP:PROD on 19 March 2025)