Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Discrimination

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Discrimination. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Discrimination|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Discrimination. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Discrimination/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Shortcut

WP:DS/DISCRIMINATION

Discrimination

Goebbels gap

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO which does not have any significant sourcing. The one source is a blog, and doesn't even give significant coverage to the term. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Internet. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - found exactly zero results in google books, google scholar, google/bing news, or newspapers.com. No regular google results either if you discount ones mentioning the creator of the neologism. Zzz plant (talk) 03:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conspiracy theories, Discrimination, and Judaism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete did not find any sigcov in reliable sources on a search Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 06:09, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Seems to be one author's coinage that never took off. Yue🌙 07:29, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The "coiner," Yair Rosenberg, is a staff writer at the Altantic and the author of books that pass the Notability guidelines. He's been featured in WaPo, The Guardian, and others. He's also been on Bill Maher, the Daily Show, and CNN, and has apparently testified before the House Foreign Affairs committee. Here This does by no means deserve its own page, but I propose this is merged and turned into one sentence on Yair Rosenberg's Wikipedia page.
Delete non-notable adaje. Azuredivay (talk) 17:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Yair Rosenberg as WP:ATD. There's some coverage, but not enough for a WP:STANDALONE [1] [2]. Longhornsg (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge is fine by me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, see my unsigned merge rec above (sorry abt that) AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is already one sentence in Yair Rosenberg which adequately covers it. Zero^talk 02:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Freeman (Mormon)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. This person does not appear to be notable except in connection with the 1978 Revelation on Priesthood and the content of this article should therefore be merged into that one. Jbt89 (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Discrimination, and Latter Day Saints. Jbt89 (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Colorado, Hawaii, North Carolina, and Utah. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:01, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomination. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Keep ~~as well as being an elder he served for a time as a LDS bishop and we usually keep articles about bishops of major religions.~~ The article includes references/ notes to reliable newspaper coverage, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Note that LDS bishops are not the same level of hierarchy in most other christian denominations like catholicism. They are more analogous to priests. I am neutral about this page otherwise.
Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 01:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to meet WP:GNG to me due to the sources around him. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 06:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as one incident. As Anonrfjwhuikdzz pointed out, bishop in the LDS Church is equivalent to a priest or pastor in most churches. Bearian (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:45, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist in hopes of generating some further discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep he is as notable as any "member of a discriminated against group that was the first to do something", which we have a lot of on Wikipedia. Also there is a lot of additional, verified, information other than him becoming the first black person to receive the Melchizedek priesthood. Masktapeisawesome (talk) 17:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Other than being the first one from a significant group, there is no significant notability. Equivalence is as pointed out by Anonrfjwhuikdzz/mentioned again by Bearian. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discrimination Proposed deletions

The following articles have been tagged for proposed deletion: