Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Cycling

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Cycling. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Cycling|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Cycling. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Sports.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Cycling/archive

Purge page cache

watch

This list includes sublists of deletion debates on articles related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling.

Cycling

Joseph Fischler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV. One possible redirect is Switzerland at the 1928 Summer Olympics. Let'srun (talk) 00:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cycling, Olympics, and Switzerland. Let'srun (talk) 00:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Switzerland at the 1928 Summer Olympics#Cycling – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 10:17, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Parra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I was unable to find any significant coverage about him. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Colombia. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The French wiki article has many sources, but they're all race listings or database listings, where Parra is only mentioned in passing. German wiki has no sources... I can't find any in my search. Appears to have won some races, but there are no extensive sources about this, other than database listings. Oaktree b (talk) 20:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The first FR wiki source talks about his win, but it repeats Tweets and is archived, on a site that translates as CyclingInColumbia, I'm going to assume it's not a RS. It's the only one that isn't a database listing regardless, so still not enough sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Found several sources in Spanish if you would like to review them. Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:21, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Found a good number of sources in Spanish, I'm sure there are more as well. 1 2 3 4 5. Also a Continental champion. Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per Seacactus 13. Svartner (talk) 00:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Start Football

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one store in Newcastle, not notable Update6 (talk) 19:12, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While I don't think being a single-location retailer is itself a reason for deletion if notability has otherwise been established, I at least wanted to note (given the non notable assertion) that this has been tagged as a potential NCORP failure since March 2015 — i.e., for about as long as the article has existed in the first place. I don't have any opinion beyond that, but the reasons to keep may not exactly be in ample supply here. (That the article is supposedly about "Start Football" but mostly seems to be about a "Start Fitness" company that deals with several sports but not football doesn't bode well either, but is not necessarily relevant to AfD.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Sports, Cycling, Sport of athletics, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:21, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Cycling History Conference

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page which are independent of the subject. Nothing much found which suggests there are sufficient RS to show that the notability criteria for inclusion have been met JMWt (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:46, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I can find plenty of info from the conference organization itself, and a few pages from locations that hosted it, but independent coverage is sparse. I did find this article: [1], but the unsubstantiated quote at the bottom, "Beware of the internet, Wikipedia, etc." does not give me confidence in the source's credibility. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cycling Proposed deletions

Deletion Review