Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Rajasthan

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Rajasthan. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Rajasthan|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Rajasthan. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to India.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Rajasthan/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Articles for deletion

Jaipur Watch Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Rajasthan. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CarDekho Group

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suspected sockpuppet involvement was found in previous AfDs. Otherwise, being IPO-bound does not establish notability. Company fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be treated with caution, as they often reproduce press releases as news (WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE). As of now, the page reads like a WP:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Rajasthan. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think this is promotionally worded, but the references are all textbook cases of run-of-the-mill coverage. Somepinkdude (talk) 13:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. CarDekho Group is a major Indian auto-tech and fintech firm. It has notable independent sources like:
- Business Standard
- Financial Express
- Financial Express
- Techcrunch etc.

showing the company’s industry impact and notability. Mysecretgarden (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This company page looks more like advertisement than information. Every line is sounding like promotion. All the sources used are mostly Indian media which just repeat company press release or funding news. There is no proper research or detailed article from strong global source. Company being IPO-bound or having big valuation does not make it notable automatically. Wikipedia need independent coverage, not paid PR type links. It fails both WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Most articles are like “CarDekho raised fund” or “CarDekho launches new app” this is routine business update, not encyclopedic.--LexyNight (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please explain which parts of the article you found promotional? If every line is sounding like promotion. Why wasn’t it tagged for G11? Let’s tag it G11 and see if it can be deleted under that, if “every line is sounding like promotion.” It is an Indian company and has operations in India, so obviously it will be covered by Indian media only. How are you expecting coverage from international media? Did you bother to read the detailed report covered by Forbes India, which is an independent and in-depth piece? Have you even done proper research or detailed analysis before commenting here? DJ allu (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As mentioned by @Y: in the previous AfD, this is $1.2 billion company and has received substantial coverage from multiple mainstream and independent media outlets, including Forbes 1, Forbes 2, Forbes 3, and Livemint 4 with detailed reporting on its operations and growth. It clearly meets WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH and promotional wording can be adjusted with edits. DJ allu (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — i see where the nom is coming from, though the evaluation of sources might have been a bit sweeping. The coverage in Forbes and LiveMint isn't really WP:RSNOI material and looks reasonably reliable and substantive for WP:NCORP. Financial Express[1] adds additional depth. EmilyR34 (talk) 09:19, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SK Finance

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Going public (IPO) doesn’t constitute a meaningful notability factor. Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, India, and Rajasthan. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the sources in article are press releases and promotional in nature. Will be happy to see non promotional non primary soruces. Mag2k (talk) 09:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Subject has some coverage in independent business media, but most reporting is limited to financial figures, IPO announcements, or investor funding rounds without in‑depth analysis or feature-length profiles. Mysecretgarden (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have seen multiple reliable sources with significant coverage. [[2]], [[3]], [[4]] and [[5]] only are enough to establish notability.Omawane (talk) 13:58, 31 October 2025 (UTC) _{Blocked for UPE Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)}[reply]
Keep Before found a featured article in Business India Magazine with detailed coverage. There is likely more available. Ninjastic Ninja (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2025 (UTC) _{Blocked for UPE Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)}[reply]
Delete not meeting WP:NCORP or WP:GNG at all. I checked most sources, all are routine business news like IPO update, fund raise or RBI licence etc or etc.... That is very normal for any NBFC and not deep coverage even the so-called “Bloomberg” or “Moneycontrol” links are mostly reprints of press releases not real independent study or profile... Also company is still private and just planning IPO... that alone not make it notable under WP:LISTED. No independent analysis no major feature article nothing showing long-term importance. Feels more like company profile copied from PR sites... Tone also looks promotional in some parts like “expanding business” and “increasing loan book” etc... not neutral encyclopedic. So overall fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGCRIT and WP:SIGCOV both. LexyNight (talk) 20:55, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – This is a long established Indian NBFC founded in 1994 and has grown to over 9,600 employees. Based on the sources identified by editors and listed in the discussion above, there appears to be sufficient coverage to establish notability. Royaltee121 (talk) 07:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC) _{Blocked for UPE Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)}[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:06, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The "keep" votes all came from socks, and the arguments regarding WP:CORPDEPTH is evident. Svartner (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]