Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Brazil

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Brazil. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Brazil|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Brazil. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to South America.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Brazil/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Brazil

Autônomos FC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Amateur team with no relevance in Brazilian football, having not played in any competition in which it has achieved sporting merit. Most of the sources present do not demonstrate WP:CONTINUED coverage, only mentioning the curiosity that the club has an anarchist theme. Blatant fails in WP:GNG and WP:MILL since there are countless amateur teams in Brazil with their own themes. Svartner (talk) 08:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Organizations, and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 08:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per statement in this nomination. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:27, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Isberner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to have the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT. Let'srun (talk) 22:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Brazil, Delaware, Louisiana, and Texas. Let'srun (talk) 22:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find any secondary sources to support notability. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 22:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 07:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
yes, Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines. There's little to no coverage in reliable, independent sources beyond basic stats. No evidence of significant impact or lasting recognition. Not enough for a standalone article. Krishnpriya123 (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Brief pro career [1], not meeting sporting notability and sourcing is not enough to even create a stub article. Article now is mostly primary sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:30, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Seconding WP:GNG. Brief pro career. Raskuly (talk) 23:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe Alves (footballer, born 1982)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable WP:COOKIE sportsman who failed WP:NSPORT and WP:BEFORE. PROD failed because Geschichte (talk · contribs) thought Alves' career might indicate significant coverage, but I see it as subjective importance and doesn't actually adhere to WP:SIGCOV. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 09:42, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. This kind of career suggests sources should be out there. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable Lord Mountbutter (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Department of Airspace Control

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies on a single source, information largely out of date. NikolaiVektovich (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Aviation, and Brazil. NikolaiVektovich (talk) 17:36, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Neither of the cited reasons for deletion are actually reasons for deletion. This department of the Government of Brazil easily meets WP:NORG, and a Google search will turn up independent third party references to that department. The catch is you need to search for the name in Portuguese. You can start by looking at the pt:Departamento_de_Controle_do_Espaço_Aéreo article which contains sources and additional content that can be translated to the English Wikipedia. RecycledPixels (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The article on pt.wiki has more sources, just needs to be transcribed. Svartner (talk) 01:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Agreed based on the reasons above, not opposed to "drafifying" article as well while its being improved,meantime a person more familiar with Portugese language can double check the sources cited in the original article.Villkomoses (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil Proposed deletions

Flag of Curitiba (via WP:PROD on 19 March 2025)
Flag of Junqueirópolis (via WP:PROD on 19 March 2025)