Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Language
![]() | Points of interest related to Language on Wikipedia: Portal – Category – WikiProject – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Language. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Language|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Language. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

watch |
Language
[edit]- Influence of cultural and linguistic diversity in communication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article doesn't just read like an essay, it essentialy is an essay. I don't have much else to say on it, but it legitamately is just an essay on, well, the influence of cultural and linnguistic diversity in communication.
Ps: sorry about the deletion tags, it didn't really fit anywhere
TLDR; WP:NOTESSAY Gaismagorm (talk) 13:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Social science. Gaismagorm (talk) 13:33, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, completely an essay, the article subject is so narrow (and yet vague), no possibility of turning this into an encyclopedic article. Delete. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 18:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: This essay is only using a single source and reads like a college paper. Drafting wouldn't help with only one source; it's likely too specialized for a wikipedia article. Oaktree b (talk) 19:35, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. With a single reference, it is also a summary of a single academic paper, not establishing WP:GNG of the concepts discussed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Volte-face (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The term has no particularized lexical content, but is merely an idiom—it describes nothing that about-face or U-turn does not, and that referent is not a real concept in political science or what have you. Remsense ‥ 论 10:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Remsense ‥ 论 10:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:INDISCRIMINATE – ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email · global) 10:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email · global) 10:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's more structured like a Wiktionary article than one for Wikipedia, even. 2601:44:180:98B0:190B:331F:A61A:D86 (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.