Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mexico

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Mexico. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Mexico|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Mexico. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Americas.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mexico/archive

Purge page cache

watch

See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Mexico/Community

Mexico

Melendez Films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks significant coverage from independent, reliable sources, failing to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If the article primarily relies on self-published or promotional sources and does not demonstrate a lasting impact, it would not meet Wikipedia’s verifiability and neutrality standards. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, Comics and animation, England, Mexico, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Bill Melendez. The article can very well be merged into Bill's page since the company was his. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico's Next Top Model season 3

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect, unnecessary. Valorrr (talk) 05:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Valorrr (talk) 05:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The nominator actually blanked and redirected this article, but *then* sent it to AfD. Since redirects cannot be nominated at AfD, I have restored the article for now. No opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge: I think a redirect would be more appropriate, there's been significant contribution on all five pages that were initially recommended for a merge with the main article, out of respect to the work that has been put in by other users.50.252.99.6 (talk) 18:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need some more opinions here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, unnecessary is not an argument. Does it pass WP:GNG?Christian75 (talk) 16:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lianna Rebolledo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD'd this back in 2023, more citations were added and tag was removed but I don't think they're reliable/independent enough to give her notability. GraziePrego (talk) 03:40, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Health and fitness, Latin America, and Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article. It isn't sourced very well right now and the sources in English are pro-life sources that may not be independent to give her notability. If you search for sources in Spanish there are reliable news organizations reporting on her though. N3rsti (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Soft Delete - Sources in English are lacking. Happy to believe there are better sources in Spanish, but we simply cannot have a WP:BLP with no reliable citations. No prejudice against recreation with better sources. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:04, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please see above: "Ineligible for soft deletion". Geschichte (talk) 10:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
AFAIK being ineligible for prod doesn't mean ineligible for soft deletion, but what I really meant was "weak keep without prejudice to recreation with better sources". — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Lack of independent sources, the sources present in the article all seem to be directly linked to the subject. Svartner (talk) 03:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico Proposed deletions