Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Middle East

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Middle East. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Middle East|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Middle East. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Middle East/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Middle East

Operations attributed to Israel in Iran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article with very biased language such as: "Israel has rarely been held accountable for its destructive actions."

Nothing more than a list of incidents/operations.

Contains information from other articles such as Assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and mentions a 2007 explosion at Parchin while information is included on Parchin's article, so why do we need it here? And attribution to Israel to attacks or incidents in Iran is reported all the time by the Iranian government. Wouldn't it make more sense to have an article on actual Israeli operations in Iran in the wider Iran-Israel proxy conflict?

Was copied from the Farsi Wikipedia. Creator has a long history of copying articles from this Wikipedia and creating the English version. I suspect the Farsi Wikipedia of having NPOV issues with the articles related to Iran and Israel that this creator. Not to mention that this article is under the category of Zionist political violence which is not supported by information in this article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Middle East, Iran, and Israel. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a FORK — both POV and REDUNDANT — of Iran–Israel proxy conflict#Assassinations, cyberwarfare and sabotage. As nom mentioned, the tone is highly non-encyclopedic. More importantly, the relevant content is adequately covered in Iran–Israel proxy conflict.

Note that the AfDd list is considerably broader and includes, for example, a terrorism incident in Iran where Iranian authorities blamed Israel, Israel denied involvement, and ISIS claimed responsibility. Such cases do not belong in a table about Iran–Israel operations. Such an accusation can be mentioned in the body of the relevant article. gidonb (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in another Afd of a similar matter: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran-Israel non-political relations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will take a look there as well. gidonb (talk) 03:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article is important because When something bad happens, Iran blames Israel Like: Kerman Bombings Farcazo (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote doesn't address the issues with the article nor explain any necessity. Any information like this can be just on the respective articles like the one linked for some reason externally, which is already mentioned on that article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a redundant fork. There are already enough articles covering the same subject. Azuredivay (talk) 06:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iran-Israel non-political relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article. No such definition of non-political relations is defined. All that is here is related to political relations, i.e. bilateral relations. Copied from the Farsi Wikipedia article, which over there no definition of what non-political relations are between two nations.

Some information is already on the main relations article. Suggest deleting this page and should any info is worth keeping be moved over to the main article.

Practically comes off as a fork of the main article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Politics, Middle East, Iran, and Israel. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 1 No such definition of non-political relations - First, for a descriptive title its definition is not required. Second, there is definition, right from dictionary: "non-political" means "not political" --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 2 comes off as a fork - please list what exactly content is forked. "Some" is usually OK. --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 3 All that is here is related to political - Not true. Individual business relations are non-political relations. State regulation of business between two countries may probably classified as political relations, but not exactly, because it affects the possibility of a business to do business in another state. Tariffs will most probably be classified as international relations. --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge to Iran–Israel relations#Business and other sections of that main article as relevant. Some of the items here are political-related, others seem fairly minor and don't need to be included. Best to add content to the main article and do a section split when appropriate rather than a separate page like this. Also please learn to use italics and quotation marks properly; they're not in the Farsi article so I'm confused why they are used this way... Reywas92^Talk 21:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Selective merge and subsequent split of Iran–Israel business relations per WP:Summary style. --Altenmann >talk 22:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the appropriate sections of Iran–Israel relations. Sushidude21! (talk) 10:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (selective) into the appropriate sections of Iran–Israel relations. The AfDd article has a negatively defined scope which should been a huge red warning sign. gidonb (talk) 04:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Khubz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary 176.28.150.183 (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Middle East. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 13:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Reason is non-valid. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 08:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's the general name for several flatbreads in the Middle East, certainly notable and independent enough for a page. jolielover♥talk 09:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also worth noting that "Kuboos" is different from Pita bread; Pita bread is thicker and softer, while this type is more popular for shawarmas. It's very rarely referred to as Pita bread here actually; I assumed it was North American. I don't think Pita and Khubz are the same thing. Some links (just to prove what I'm saying is true, obviously not to be used as sources: [1],

[2]) referring to this flatbread as Kuboos, Some info on that could be added. Also, I'd recommend moving this title to Kuboos since that's usually how it's spelled and pronounced. jolielover♥talk 11:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC) [reply]

- I still think it should be kept as it's the term for bread in the Middle East and typically refers to Arabic bread. There should be a general page for Arabic bread as there are different types; however, am striking my vote since maybe the article should be recreated, or something of the sort. Arabic bread or bread in the ME would probably be a more appropriate title. jolielover♥talk 04:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 19:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to 'Bread in the Arab Middle East' or something similar. 'Khubz' can be any bread. --Soman (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jolielover there is no word in Arabic as "Kuboos". I don't know what you are referring by that word. The article in question is about Khubz, not Kuboos. "Kaboos" means nightmare in Arabic.

Khubz in Arabic can refer to any type of bread. Just type bread in Google translate. Khubz is "bread". It is a word. Not a type of bread. 176.28.150.183 (talk) 03:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment: we use pita or saj or tortilla for shawerma. We don't have a "Kuboos" bread. 176.28.150.183 (talk) 03:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just googled "Kuboos" and found that it is used to refer to Pita [3] 176.28.150.183 (talk) 03:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The first link says clearly "Golden Loaf Arabic Shawarma Breads" and the second link, on the picture, the writings on the bag read "Lebanese bread" 176.28.150.183 (talk) 03:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrian-Kurdish Clashes (1840-1895)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks sufficient reliable sources and appears to reflect a non-neutral, possibly partisan narrative. It fails to meet Wikipedia’s standards for notability, sourcing, and neutrality. Much of the content is unsourced or poorly cited, and it presents a historical conflict in a way that seems one-sided, potentially violating Wikipedia's policies on neutrality (WP:NPOV) and verifiability (WP:V). A search for academic or high-quality sources on this specific topic yields very little coverage, suggesting it may not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for historical events (WP:NOTE). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madeaccountfr (talk • contribs) 08:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Middle East. Shellwood (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check the page now Suraya222 (talk) 11:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are some pretty poorly written sections, both from a sourcing standpoint and actual written English (the ones with seemingly random capitalized words are especially jarring to look at), but the article is salveagable and I think there's at least a good chance a good article can be written on the subject. In any case I'm not going to give the benefit of the doubt to the banned (not just blocked!) nominator who is a notoriously bad faith participant. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Iraq, and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Zemen (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.

Jackhanma69 (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' - I don't see the reason for Deletion, And I provided the sources and Made the Page better Suraya222 (talk) 22:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' – if there's another problem, please tell me so I can change it. Suraya222 (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' Suraya222 (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can Anyone Please Tell me how the hell do I type Keep but Bold and Black Suraya222 (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The information is backed by the sources. Assyrians and Kurds had many clashes in Hakkari in the 1800s that are well documented. Termen28 (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. StrongCap (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC) Blocked as a sock. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@StrongCap Explain why you want the page to be deleted Suraya222 (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Suraya222 (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note here that both the nominator Madeaccountfr and voter StrongCap have been blocked as sockpuppets of notorious WP:LTA editor Tishreen07 [4]. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. R3YBOl (🌲) 06:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@R3YBOl could you please Explain Why do you want the page to be deleted? I mean every page I made you wanted it to be deleted Suraya222 (talk) 13:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep -~~ Suraya222 (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think its informative and gives a good overview of Assyrian-Kurdish relations in that period. I can't find any issues with the article that's worth deleting it for.Ilamxan (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

idk why @R3YBOI Want to delete every page i make Suraya222 (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion is a mess. @User:Suraya222, you are only allowed to make one bolded !vote per AfD discussion – please strike the rest. Could we get editors from outside this topic area to weigh in please?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 23:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't know Suraya222 (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you could Suraya222 (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This looks a case of WP:SYNTH as none of the sources discuss this subject in the context of this very specific timescale. Instead it's a bunch of meh sources not addressing the overall subject and being bolted together. That's classic synth and this feels like its either a fork from a wider more general article or should be in a wider history of the conflict if specific sources addressing the conflict as a whole are not available. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What are you even talking about??? Suraya222 (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Suraya222 Please review WP:CIVIL and WP:TALK. The editor raised legitimate policy concerns about WP:SYNTH that deserve a substantive response rather than dismissal. R3YBOl (🌲) 15:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 16:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christelle Bedran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear fail of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, contested prod. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Middle East, and Lebanon. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sources (such as [5]) are enough to demonstrate notability of the subject. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lebanese Football Association is a primary website. One source is not enough to demonstrate notability, even if it contains IRS SIGCOV. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:48, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FA Lebanon is not the Lebanese Football Association. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:07, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:21, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep—Although I recognize that FA Lebanon is not the Lebanese Football Association, and thus I believe the above source is valid, I'm not sure it's enough to bring this article fully into WP:SIGCOV compliance. That said, if we take the policy exactly by its letter, I think this article creeps barely over the line. Anwegmann (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Country deletion sorting

Bahrain

2025 Asian Men's Volleyball Championship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This event simply never happened and will never happen, someone mistaken this with 2025 AVC Men's Volleyball Nations Cup and created a page mistakenly. I tried redirecting this but some careless user(s) reverted my redirect. so I think deletion is a better answer to avoid misunderstanding. The next Asian Championship will be held in 2026. Sports2021 (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Volleyball, and Bahrain. Shellwood (talk) 14:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, looks like G6:Error. Gjs238 (talk) 23:12, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bahrain Proposed deletions

Egypt

Mohamed Hafez El-Sayed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 01:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Egypt. LibStar (talk) 01:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging our Egyptian Olympians expert, @Canadian Paul:. Is there anything to find here? BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:13, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Coordination of Revolutionary Parties and Organizations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since this article was created in 2011, it has been based almost entirely on citations to sources either from the ICOR itself or from its affiliate members. Attempts to find coverage in reliable secondary source turned up very little. Neither of the cited secondary sources in this article provide significant coverage, only giving the ICOR a passing reference in the wider context of another subject. A cursory Google Scholar search brought up a few self-published Marxist word documents, and one book about German political parties that only mentions the ICOR in passing.

As I have been unable to find significant coverage of this international organisation in reliable sources, and as notability is not inherited from any of its affiliated organisations, I do not think this meets the notability criteria for organisations and am nominating it for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa, Tunisia, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Iran, India, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and United States of America. Grnrchst (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I believe there may be a language / coverage issue, as this is English Wikipedia, and there are two or three English-speaking organizations within ICOR. I will look into it this week. Castroonthemoon (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most online sources I found were either non-independent or were not in-depth. The one book cited in the article was written by Stefan Engel, former chairman of the MLPD, a member organization of ICOR. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not looking good for significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have looked into international reports on the organization. There's a surprising amount of information surrounding the group's involvement in Syria, and the hospital that the group built. Castroonthemoon (talk) 05:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning towards Keep Castroonthemoon (talk) 05:30, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unless Castroonthemoon can cite specific sources with significant coverage, I'm leaning delete. The only mention in Swiss media is [6]. Toadspike [Talk] 08:55, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moustafa Allozy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. No SIGCOV to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 23:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Egypt. LibStar (talk) 23:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, just participating in the Olympics is not enough for notability, and I see no WP:SIGCOV. GoldRomean (talk) 00:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Canadian Paul:, who usually is able to find sources for Egyptian Olympians. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Egypt at the 1992 Summer Olympics#Weightlifting – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 08:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - though ping me if sources found. I've done some BEFORE and only found a blog-type list of "20 greatest weightlifters" in Egypt - which does not to me establish notability. Kingsif (talk) 09:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed El-Tantawy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. No SIGCOV to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 23:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Egypt. LibStar (talk) 23:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, did not medal and no WP:SIGCOV. GoldRomean (talk) 00:50, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Canadian Paul:, who usually is able to find sources for Egyptian Olympians. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I also find some results for Mediterranean Games and World Weightlifting Championships, so there may be GNG sources about these events, too, if Paul is looking. Kingsif (talk) 09:55, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahim Fadl

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. All I could find was at [[7]], but there isn't enough significant coverage about the subject to meet the notability guidelines. Let'srun (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Egypt. Let'srun (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Egypt at the 1936 Summer Olympics#Swimming – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 16:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most sources I'm finding are for the recent Olympic footballer Ibrahim Fadli; besides the significant lack of digital sources for a non-Western 1930s athlete, this is muddying efforts. Kingsif (talk) 11:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baltagiya

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:wikipedia is not a dictionary 176.28.150.183 (talk) 22:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Crime. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Opppse , the baltagiya are not just criminals , they are a unique group that effected the Egyptian society in recent decades and had a huge effect onedia and culture 196.134.113.234 (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This article doesn't just provide a definition for a word, it's a clear outline of a social phenomenon in a country, a social class that exists that is unique to the country of Egypt. Compare this article with the article for British chavs (Chav). "Baltagiya" isn't just a direct Arabic translation of the word "thug," it's an actual social class that has similar characteristics and in my opinion this warrants its own article. Kabahaly (talk) 10:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article in its current state doesn't represent the topic like it's a social class or a phenomenon. It represents it as a word for thugs. Thus it worth deletion. 176.28.150.183 (talk) 20:20, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a reasonable reason for deletion. TheGoofWasHere (talk) 00:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:V. Besides being horrendously written, there is zero evidence that this is a social class. I wouldn't oppose a draftification. Bearian (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article is bad only in part, yet it is neither unfounded nor irrelevant. It needn't be a social class, for this is no encyclopedia of Marxism. The article just needs more work. Draftification would certainly not speed up things. 217.244.108.62 (talk) 12:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The article primarily talks about Baltagiyas, not just the meaning. FYI, simply citing a policy and saying nothing else isn't a rationale, I can barely even see the link.--TheGoofWasHere (talk) 00:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:HEY - much improved. Bearian (talk) 14:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt Proposed deletions

Arab American Vehicles (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
East Mediterranean Gas Company (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Egyptalum (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
eSpace (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Herrawi Group (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Ibrachy & Dermarkar (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Mo'men (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Olympic Group (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Seoudi Group (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Shotmed Paper Industries (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Corona (confectioner) (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Starworld (via WP:PROD on 3 November 2024)
Bahgat Group (via WP:PROD on 2 November 2024)

Iran

Iran strike intel leak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why do we need this page when it could be easily subsumed under United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites? It's not as though this "leak" (if the report were indeed genuine) was that earth-shattering as to deserve its own article. KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 02:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

obvious merge per above of what is and probably always shall be a single paragraph taken out of context from a larger article. Mangoe (talk) 02:19, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Iran, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Mangoe. Not every action of this conflict needs an article. Devopam (talk) 10:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites: per nom Laura240406 (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Not notable except in context of the strikes Placeholderer (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Coordination of Revolutionary Parties and Organizations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since this article was created in 2011, it has been based almost entirely on citations to sources either from the ICOR itself or from its affiliate members. Attempts to find coverage in reliable secondary source turned up very little. Neither of the cited secondary sources in this article provide significant coverage, only giving the ICOR a passing reference in the wider context of another subject. A cursory Google Scholar search brought up a few self-published Marxist word documents, and one book about German political parties that only mentions the ICOR in passing.

As I have been unable to find significant coverage of this international organisation in reliable sources, and as notability is not inherited from any of its affiliated organisations, I do not think this meets the notability criteria for organisations and am nominating it for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa, Tunisia, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Iran, India, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and United States of America. Grnrchst (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I believe there may be a language / coverage issue, as this is English Wikipedia, and there are two or three English-speaking organizations within ICOR. I will look into it this week. Castroonthemoon (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most online sources I found were either non-independent or were not in-depth. The one book cited in the article was written by Stefan Engel, former chairman of the MLPD, a member organization of ICOR. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not looking good for significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have looked into international reports on the organization. There's a surprising amount of information surrounding the group's involvement in Syria, and the hospital that the group built. Castroonthemoon (talk) 05:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning towards Keep Castroonthemoon (talk) 05:30, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unless Castroonthemoon can cite specific sources with significant coverage, I'm leaning delete. The only mention in Swiss media is [8]. Toadspike [Talk] 08:55, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iran transition government

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Everything here that mentions the government is a primary source from the transitional government itself, or a related Iranian diaspora organization. There are no secondary sources for things besides statements from Pahlavi.

Source analysis:

1 is a Twitter link.
2 is a diaspora Iranian organization, primary source.
3 is the closest thing here to a secondary source, but also fails to establish this as a clear new government, if anything it provides notability for an article called "Munich Convergence Meeting" rather than the government. The article itself states that the meeting did not intend to "launch a new organization."
4 talks about the conference but doesn't mention the government.
5 to 19 are all either Twitter links, or reliable sources that discuss Reza Pahlavi's statements, but do not actually discuss the transitional government.
20 to 27 are primary sources from the government themselves.
28 to 34 again, are news articles discussing Pahlavi and the prospect of regime change.

In short, there are no secondary sources that establish the transitional government is notable, and no news articles that even mention it existing. As such I don't think it meets notability guidelines. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 17:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to note that a single news article (from a secondary source) that elaborates on what the transition government actually is would likely at least establish it exists, its just that everything listed so far either is a primary source or a news article of Pahlavi saying that he has a "transition plan" which is distinct from the fully fledged organization described in this article. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 17:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Iran. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete* as premature and not noteworthy as evidenced by the lack of RS on the subject.65.229.28.177 (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is fairly common for Wikipedia to have articles about governments in exile, (such as Ukraine Salvation Committee, Free Joseon and Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam) and for self-proclaimed alternative governments, (such as Government of Peace and Unity and Government of National Stability and the Revolutionary Government of the Republic of Indonesia). Therefore I see no reason why a government in exile / alternative government being formed for Iran by a prominent member of the Iranian royal house should not warrant such an article.Dn9ahx (talk) 21:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: I wouldn't reject notability entirely as it is quite often discussed among opposition groups especially with recent events. I do though have some hesitancy about a full article since it's mostly proposals at this time and not any institutional government right now (PM, cabinet, etc). Because of this, I think the material in the article should be transferred over to the Iranian opposition page, and it can separate out as an article in the future if an actual transitional government is formed. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 22:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep (note that I wrote the article): The topic is very notable and naturally governments in exile of non Anglo-Saxon countries tend to be covered mainly by diaspora newspapers in their native languages. That’s why many of the sources are non English and come from diaspora based outlets. This particular government in exile is in formation since February and has grown particularly relevant following the Iran Israel war. Overall I wholeheartedly agree with Dn9ahx KiltedKangaroo (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the issue of sourcing raised by MaggieT19: the sources include several prominent outlets such as AP News, the BBC, and Bloomberg. I’ve also added Politico and DW. It appears an editor mistakenly included Twitter as a source. I’ve since removed it. KiltedKangaroo (talk) 16:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all twitter sources added by editors. KiltedKangaroo (talk) 05:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article topic is notable, it just needs better sources and perhaps a rewrite. MaggieT19 (talk) 09:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: After looking through the sources again, I've decided to support deletion—there just isn't enough substantial coverage to justify a standalone article. MaggieT19 (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per Dn9ahx Mahan (talk) 12:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTALBALL. If the threshold for notability is coverage by diaspora groups and media, then any opposition or separatist movement could have a "transition government" article for some hypothetical future. Should there be a Chinese transitional government article or US dictatorship article just because some authors in reliable sources have speculated on these topics? No, of course not, per WP:CRYSTALBALL. A claimed exile government is different in that it at least exists, but having an article dedicated to a transitional government that is merely speculative seems WP:TOOSOON. Yue🌙 18:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This topic is notable and is oftentimes discussed amongst Iranian opposition groups and individual figures. Even if it is not notable here, it may be notable elsewhere. ISRO4883 (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Make Iran Great Again

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor offshoot of the current attack on Iran by the US and Israel, lacks WP:NOTNEWS lasting notability. Could be a redirect if it is mentioned briefly in another article, otherwise should be deleted.

Oh, and the "own work" image in the article should definitely go, we are not in the business of making up nice images for current political issues. Fram (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, Iran, and United States of America. Fram (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Keep, Covered by lots of reliable sources (Gaurdian, Reuters, The Telegraph, Time Magazine, NBC, Fox, BBC, The Times, CBS, SKY News, CNN, The Hill) and more. HumanRight 16:19, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's what happens with news. We are not a news site though, we are an encyclopedia. Our article titles are not Trump soundbites, our topics are not the craze of the day. Fram (talk) 16:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fram This article is very similar to Make America Great Again. It has become very popular among Iranian users on social media platforms. By WP:SIGCOV this article is unrelated to United States strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and refers directly to regime change in Iran, not the destruction of nuclear facilities. Also by WP:GNG the topic is notable as that has independently made headlines in major news. By WP:CFORK this article can be independent. HumanRight 17:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GNG doesn´t exist in a vacuum, lower on the same page you find WP:SUSTAINED, which is the issue here. The slogan is not known to have lasting impact yet, unlike MAGA. No idea what Cfork has to do with anything. Fram (talk) 17:53, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fram The fact behind this slogan is to change the Iranian regime for the first time by an American president.(1) (2). I believe this article has not even been allowed to breathe. This article will definitely expand. There are so many images going viral on social media that I can't publish them due to copyright. This slogan will be the beginning of the revolution of the Iranian people. Here, the beginning of the news coverage of this slogan in the Persian-language media is quite clear. (3). My suggestion is that a Persian-speaking admin review this request, although I believe that according to the rules I mentioned above, this article is a notable one. Regards. HumanRight 18:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:CRYSTAL. Fram (talk) 19:15, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sustained coverage. We don't create a new article every time a head of state coins a new term. This can be adequately covered with a mention at Foreign policy of the second Donald Trump administration#Iran and possibly one of the various articles about this conflict. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:47, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Easiest WP:NOTNEWS ever. Jebiguess (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Same rationale and explanation as Thebiguglyalien. Yue🌙 18:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. Nothing found any coverage for the title of the page. Wait for the more reliable sources for a better coverage as same as Make America Great Again. Alampe (Talk – Edits) 12:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cilovluq genocide

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. The topic lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent, and verifiable sources. Most of the references are either partisan, locally produced, or non-scholarly, and the event is not discussed in academic or mainstream historical literature. Furthermore, the article appears to violate Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy by presenting a one-sided narrative without acknowledging other perspectives or providing balanced context. Without reliable sources and a neutral tone, this topic does not merit a standalone article on Wikipedia.

Wikivro (talk) 06:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article does not use encyclopedic language, its content and title are heavily biased, and it cites government-linked Turkish and Azerbaijani sources. If there was a massacre, it should be based on reliable and scholarly works, not Anadolu Agency, etc. ----Երևանցի ^talk 07:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
:Keep I don't want you to be surprised, But This thing is Very Known and famous in Azerbaijan, And most of sources I got it from Azerbaijani Wikipedia, and there are other sources that aren't Azerbaijani?
~~And I don't really see the problem of the page~~

~~It has a lot of sources And There are Sources that aren't Azerbaijani, Suraya222 (talk) 10:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)~~ - non-WP:GS/AA user --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
:Keep Anadolu agency cites multiple historians and scholars, the exact pages as well. I don’t see what’s so unreliable about this? Are you saying that Azerbaijani and Turkish sources are inaccurate and unusable now simply because they choose to document about a genocide their people went through? The atrocities are even mentioned by Iranian historians like Ahmad Kasravi who is an eyewitness of it all. The page uses encyclopedic language and is understandable for readers. How is the content and title biased? The Urmia massacre done in revenge for Mar Shimun (a major part of Cilovluq) for example, multiple sources document about this—including English sources—such as the historian Mehrdad Kia with his book “The Clash of Empires and the Rise of Kurdish Proto-Nationalism, 1905–1926 Ismail Agha Simko and the Campaign for an Independent Kurdish State” page 121. 2A02:AA1:1164:2A69:617B:D586:307A:A0A3 (talk) 11:25, 23 June 2025 (UTC) - non-WP:GS/AA user --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination, Events, Iran, and Azerbaijan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sorry but you are very incorrect, Cilovluq is very mainstream and famous in Azerbaijan. So instead of nominating everything for deletion simply because you don’t research enough, maybe go on google and search it up. They have even done excavations and found bones, there is also photographic evidence and eyewitness testimony as provided in the page. Also I still don’t think you understand, the sources are literally academic and from eyewitness testimony, and also historians? You know this event is highly documented in books right? It’s very known that the Assyrians and Armenians under Agha Petros committed atrocities in order to establish an Assyrian region and get rid of the Muslims in Iranian Azerbaijan. And the page literally provided perspectives from other authors?!? It includes reliable sources and a neutral tone, how about you provide some examples when nominating the whole page for deletion. The page has a total of 70 sources, all of which is accessible in one way or another. And we can add even more if that’s necessary, the genocide deserves more recognition from English readers. The Muslim people of Iranian Azerbaijan deserve recognition. the ottomans literally cried when they recaptured the areas from the Christian’s, it was truly horrible. The muslims

~~of Iranian Azerbaijan have tried to get recognized, an English page on the matter is a good way to get recognition. 2A02:AA1:1164:2A69:617B:D586:307A:A0A3 (talk) 11:15, 23 June 2025 (UTC)~~ - non-WP:GS/AA user --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Support per nom. R3YBOl (🌲) 11:20, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Here we go again Why the hell you want the page to be deleted? Suraya222 (talk) 12:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)~~ - non-WP:GS/AA user --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the page itself is well detailed and talks about the genocide in Iranian azerbajian, the page itself lists a good amount of sources about the genocide, the page itself only needs some clean up since the page is long, not necessary to delete. Jsanihsjsn (talk) 11:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC) - non-WP:GS/AA user --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'll be blunt. This looks like yet another poorly sourced, POV worded WP:TENDENTIOUS article to serve as some sort of counter against the Armenian genocide and Assyrian genocide. It's also created by a non-WP:GS/AA user, and heck, all the "Keep" votes are also by non-WP:GS/AA users, and thus I've striked their comments. I recall a smart user once saying that there are no coincidences in WP:GS/AA articles, something is clearly up. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HistoryofIran I can smell WP:MEAT and I think someone is trying to avoid the block again. Kajmer05 (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:G5, article created in violation of extended confirmed sanctions. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 08:40, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Is there anything precluding that non-WP:GS/AA are not able to vote in this AfD? Like @Kajmer05 said above, there is highly likely meatpuppetry involved in the making of this article, especially as a high number of meats have been created and blocked since January that focus on 20th-century conflicts related to several West Asian groups. Given the votes that were strikethrough'ed, some clarity would be useful.

Surayeproject3 (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zaya Younan

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a re-creation of a previous article deleted in June 2017. Still fails WP:N and subsequently WP:BIO. The references provided all rely on promotional interviews and cannot be considered as independent of the subject. As the CEO of Younan Properties, he should not inherit any notability solely from the business he owns and runs. Loopy30 (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Loopy30 (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:13, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Concern that the publication of this article was solicited on Upwork by an account named "Alex Younan, WLM Media". We shouldn't stand by quietly while having Wikipedia being so blatantly enhanced by the children of biography subjects. - Poof positive (talk) 21:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with the nominator, sources are not independent of the subject. Nayyn (talk) 23:13, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operations attributed to Israel in Iran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article with very biased language such as: "Israel has rarely been held accountable for its destructive actions."

Nothing more than a list of incidents/operations.

Contains information from other articles such as Assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and mentions a 2007 explosion at Parchin while information is included on Parchin's article, so why do we need it here? And attribution to Israel to attacks or incidents in Iran is reported all the time by the Iranian government. Wouldn't it make more sense to have an article on actual Israeli operations in Iran in the wider Iran-Israel proxy conflict?

Was copied from the Farsi Wikipedia. Creator has a long history of copying articles from this Wikipedia and creating the English version. I suspect the Farsi Wikipedia of having NPOV issues with the articles related to Iran and Israel that this creator. Not to mention that this article is under the category of Zionist political violence which is not supported by information in this article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Middle East, Iran, and Israel. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a FORK — both POV and REDUNDANT — of Iran–Israel proxy conflict#Assassinations, cyberwarfare and sabotage. As nom mentioned, the tone is highly non-encyclopedic. More importantly, the relevant content is adequately covered in Iran–Israel proxy conflict.

Note that the AfDd list is considerably broader and includes, for example, a terrorism incident in Iran where Iranian authorities blamed Israel, Israel denied involvement, and ISIS claimed responsibility. Such cases do not belong in a table about Iran–Israel operations. Such an accusation can be mentioned in the body of the relevant article. gidonb (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in another Afd of a similar matter: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran-Israel non-political relations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will take a look there as well. gidonb (talk) 03:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article is important because When something bad happens, Iran blames Israel Like: Kerman Bombings Farcazo (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote doesn't address the issues with the article nor explain any necessity. Any information like this can be just on the respective articles like the one linked for some reason externally, which is already mentioned on that article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a redundant fork. There are already enough articles covering the same subject. Azuredivay (talk) 06:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iran-Israel non-political relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article. No such definition of non-political relations is defined. All that is here is related to political relations, i.e. bilateral relations. Copied from the Farsi Wikipedia article, which over there no definition of what non-political relations are between two nations.

Some information is already on the main relations article. Suggest deleting this page and should any info is worth keeping be moved over to the main article.

Practically comes off as a fork of the main article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Politics, Middle East, Iran, and Israel. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 1 No such definition of non-political relations - First, for a descriptive title its definition is not required. Second, there is definition, right from dictionary: "non-political" means "not political" --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 2 comes off as a fork - please list what exactly content is forked. "Some" is usually OK. --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 3 All that is here is related to political - Not true. Individual business relations are non-political relations. State regulation of business between two countries may probably classified as political relations, but not exactly, because it affects the possibility of a business to do business in another state. Tariffs will most probably be classified as international relations. --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge to Iran–Israel relations#Business and other sections of that main article as relevant. Some of the items here are political-related, others seem fairly minor and don't need to be included. Best to add content to the main article and do a section split when appropriate rather than a separate page like this. Also please learn to use italics and quotation marks properly; they're not in the Farsi article so I'm confused why they are used this way... Reywas92^Talk 21:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Selective merge and subsequent split of Iran–Israel business relations per WP:Summary style. --Altenmann >talk 22:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the appropriate sections of Iran–Israel relations. Sushidude21! (talk) 10:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (selective) into the appropriate sections of Iran–Israel relations. The AfDd article has a negatively defined scope which should been a huge red warning sign. gidonb (talk) 04:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Isfahan explosion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Iran. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This was internationally reported including by non-typical sources such as MTV. There are multiple stories here which contribute to broad coverage and GNG. One is the industrial disaster, but also the profile of the related corporations and players responsible. Also sources have connected this explosion to the military manufacturing of weaponized drones, and that weapons manufacturing is of international concern beyond typical stories of industrial disaster. Bluerasberry (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:SUSTAINED. Only secondary sources contribute to GNG. Wikipedia is not a news aggregator. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 19:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kerman, Mazandaran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGEO, non-notable village in Iran. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 16:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is currently being addressed. I'm trying to collect as much information possible to make sure it can considered notable.PAper GOL (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The relevant criteria here are explained in WP:GEOLAND: Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. It is a little concerning that a couple of the reference links appear to be broken but if it is in fact a populated, legally recognized place, the article will likely pass. Cielquiparle (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A great part of articles are random villages. This is because the objective is to cover every village in the world. This should be kept no matter what. Earth605 (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:02, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

leaning keep It does look like a village on GMaps, but there is a history of the Iranian census being misrepresented. Could we get confirmation from a Farsi speaker? Mangoe (talk) 19:41, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to address the WPV issues
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iran Proposed deletions

Standardized Patient (via WP:PROD on 29 January 2024)

Iraq

Abu Yasir

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some mentions, Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Terrorism, and Iraq. Shellwood (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Saudi Arabia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no independent source found agree with nom--Unclethepoter (talk) 21:34, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a munshi, like a cantor or chancellor in other Abrahamic religions, is not automatically notable, and there's a lack of reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:35, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrian Progressive Nationalist Party

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restarting a deletion discussion for this article, will aim to detail in a reply Surayeproject3 (talk) 02:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, Organizations, Politics, and Iraq. Surayeproject3 (talk) 02:25, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I originally nominated this article for deletion back in March of this year. Following a larger search for sources, I only found five worth noting:

Constitution of the party
Iraq Country Assessment by the UK, on page 66
Leftist Parties of Iraq (now dead website), mentions year of establishment, founder, and ideology
Europa World Year, mentions opposition to Kurdish region
Journal article by Vahram Petrosian, on page 25

Even within these sources, the subject is only given small mentions that are one or a few sentences in length. A commenter on the previous AfD mentioned that there would've been print media discussions of the party, though I couldn't find any such sources archived (even by searching the name of the party in Arabic, no results come up). Having not found more than these five sources with more or similar discussion, it's safe to assume that the articles fails Wikipedia:SIGCOV beyond trivial mentions and, although noting that reliable sources exist mentioning the party, that WP:ORGSIG applies as other similar parties exist that advocate for the same things. I argue for deletion based on these merits. Surayeproject3 (talk) 02:46, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This was the party of Saddam Hussein, who was executed in 2006. Nothing found that indicates this party still exists. — Maile (talk) 03:22, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Notability is not temporary. Just because it is no longer exists does not itself mean it isn't notable. Curbon7 (talk) 03:42, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"This was the party of Saddam Hussein"? What? Geschichte (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this already passed a AfD very recently. Nothing has changed since, and my argument remains: "whilst contemporary internet coverage is very scarse, it is worth noting that it would have received media attention in print media in Iraq at the time (esp. as being propped up by the govt at the time). The stance on national question is also interesting, as contrast to other groups. Here is an English version of its program [9]." --Soman (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Allblessed (talk) 17:50, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question to @Soman - I stated above that I couldn't find any print media discussions of the party anywhere online, much less archived. What exactly is your rationale for keeping the article if these sources can't be found, and the existing sources do not indicate sufficient notability? Surayeproject3 (talk) 14:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moujhed Fahid Khalifa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. All the sources are databases/results listing. Arab Athletics Championships is a lower tier competition that wouldn't meet WP:NATH. LibStar (talk) 02:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Iraq. LibStar (talk) 02:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Specifically, today the Arab Championships have a C-class rating from WA. Geschichte (talk) 13:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte, do you have an opinion on notability of this athlete? LibStar (talk) 06:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: inelig for soft deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – The athlete has a consistent career and not just a random Olympic competition. Svartner (talk) 16:31, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment From some forums, he does seem to be at least the best-performing all time track and field athlete from Iraq, do we call that best? To the point of searches, his name has been transliterated from Arabic in various other ways - and I'm not entirely sure the (OR?) Arabic rendering at our article is accurate. In quick search I've seen the first name also spelt Moujahed/Moujahid/Mujihid (generally, it does have a vowel in the middle), and the middle name spelt Fahd and Fahad. The Olympics website has him as Mujihid Fahad Khalifa [10]. Kingsif (talk) 09:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrian-Kurdish Clashes (1840-1895)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks sufficient reliable sources and appears to reflect a non-neutral, possibly partisan narrative. It fails to meet Wikipedia’s standards for notability, sourcing, and neutrality. Much of the content is unsourced or poorly cited, and it presents a historical conflict in a way that seems one-sided, potentially violating Wikipedia's policies on neutrality (WP:NPOV) and verifiability (WP:V). A search for academic or high-quality sources on this specific topic yields very little coverage, suggesting it may not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for historical events (WP:NOTE). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madeaccountfr (talk • contribs) 08:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Middle East. Shellwood (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check the page now Suraya222 (talk) 11:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are some pretty poorly written sections, both from a sourcing standpoint and actual written English (the ones with seemingly random capitalized words are especially jarring to look at), but the article is salveagable and I think there's at least a good chance a good article can be written on the subject. In any case I'm not going to give the benefit of the doubt to the banned (not just blocked!) nominator who is a notoriously bad faith participant. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Iraq, and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Zemen (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.

Jackhanma69 (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' - I don't see the reason for Deletion, And I provided the sources and Made the Page better Suraya222 (talk) 22:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' – if there's another problem, please tell me so I can change it. Suraya222 (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' Suraya222 (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can Anyone Please Tell me how the hell do I type Keep but Bold and Black Suraya222 (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The information is backed by the sources. Assyrians and Kurds had many clashes in Hakkari in the 1800s that are well documented. Termen28 (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. StrongCap (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC) Blocked as a sock. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@StrongCap Explain why you want the page to be deleted Suraya222 (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Suraya222 (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note here that both the nominator Madeaccountfr and voter StrongCap have been blocked as sockpuppets of notorious WP:LTA editor Tishreen07 [11]. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. R3YBOl (🌲) 06:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@R3YBOl could you please Explain Why do you want the page to be deleted? I mean every page I made you wanted it to be deleted Suraya222 (talk) 13:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep -~~ Suraya222 (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think its informative and gives a good overview of Assyrian-Kurdish relations in that period. I can't find any issues with the article that's worth deleting it for.Ilamxan (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

idk why @R3YBOI Want to delete every page i make Suraya222 (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion is a mess. @User:Suraya222, you are only allowed to make one bolded !vote per AfD discussion – please strike the rest. Could we get editors from outside this topic area to weigh in please?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 23:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't know Suraya222 (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you could Suraya222 (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This looks a case of WP:SYNTH as none of the sources discuss this subject in the context of this very specific timescale. Instead it's a bunch of meh sources not addressing the overall subject and being bolted together. That's classic synth and this feels like its either a fork from a wider more general article or should be in a wider history of the conflict if specific sources addressing the conflict as a whole are not available. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What are you even talking about??? Suraya222 (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Suraya222 Please review WP:CIVIL and WP:TALK. The editor raised legitimate policy concerns about WP:SYNTH that deserve a substantive response rather than dismissal. R3YBOl (🌲) 15:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 16:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

Galil cheese

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has all of the same issues as with Shifra Cheese (see here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shifra_cheese), which was created by the same editor. Truthnope (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Truthnope (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Israeli cheeses. 🟥⭐ ^{talk to me!} 03:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE The Haaretz link is incorrect. I cannot verify any of the other references. Dualpendel (talk) 17:18, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not merge, unless we have any sources that are verifiable. We do not seem to. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:04, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shifra cheese

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All seven references are used simultaneously for every section. Verifiability for these claims is questionable. No page numbers are given for any of these books. The two links given are dead and cannot be recovered from the wayback machine.

Furthermore, the citations for the books seem off. For example, there is a Daniel Rogov who writes guides on Israeli wine, and there was a version published in 2005, but the title The Ultimate Guide to Israeli Wines isn't used (there is a The Ultimate Rogov's Guide to Israeli Wines from 2011) and they seem to be published by Toby Press, not Gefen Publishing House. There is also a book called "The New Middle Eastern Vegetarian: Modern Recipes from Veggiestan", but the author is listed as Sally Butcher, not Gil Atlas. I cannot find the Schreiber or Lewin books anywhere. Only the Solomonov and Cook reference has no apparent flaw. If anybody can find a few of these sources (perhaps they're in Hebrew), I'll withdraw this nomination, but as is, the article appears to be built on almost nothing. Truthnope (talk) 01:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Truthnope (talk) 01:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Israeli cheeses. 🟥⭐ ^{talk to me!} 03:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dualpendel (talk • contribs) 17:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not merge, unless we have any sources that are verifiable. We do not seem to. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli feta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are many problems with the references. For one, no page numbers are given. I cannot find the books "Cheese from the Land of Milk and Honey: A Guide to Israeli Cheese". I also can't find "Food in Israel: A Mediterranean Journey." or "The Secret Life of Cheese: The Complete Guide to Cheese and Cheese-Making in Israel", although the authors exist (Mayer-Chissick appears to be an Israeli author and is listed by the National Library of Israel (https://www.nli.org.il/en/a-topic/987007462694605171) but this particular book is not mentioned). The source by Gur exists (and can be found here https://archive.org/details/bookofnewisraeli0000gurj/page/220/mode/2up?q=feta) and has a section on cheese but does not mention Israeli feta. The same is true for the source by Nathan (https://archive.org/details/foodsofisraeltod0000nath/page/242/mode/2up) which is cited for a claim about bourekas, ziva, and borek, but does not mention any of these dishes, at least from a quick search. As such, it appears difficult to verify any of these claims, unless somebody can provide page numbers. ISBNs would also help.

The creator of this article also created the article Shifra cheese, which shares many of the same issues and which I also nominated for deletion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shifra_cheese). Truthnope (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Truthnope (talk) 02:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Israeli cheeses. 🟥⭐ ^{talk to me!} 03:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of Israeli cheeses per WP:ATD. Servite et contribuere (talk) 13:23, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: to the list of cheeses seems fine. The product exists [12], but most coverage I find is cookbooks using the product. Oaktree b (talk) 13:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Israeli cheeses Mike_Delis (talk) 17:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Israeli cheeses, as the topic is too specific for a separate page. J. P. Fridrich (talk) 05:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operations attributed to Israel in Iran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article with very biased language such as: "Israel has rarely been held accountable for its destructive actions."

Nothing more than a list of incidents/operations.

Contains information from other articles such as Assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and mentions a 2007 explosion at Parchin while information is included on Parchin's article, so why do we need it here? And attribution to Israel to attacks or incidents in Iran is reported all the time by the Iranian government. Wouldn't it make more sense to have an article on actual Israeli operations in Iran in the wider Iran-Israel proxy conflict?

Was copied from the Farsi Wikipedia. Creator has a long history of copying articles from this Wikipedia and creating the English version. I suspect the Farsi Wikipedia of having NPOV issues with the articles related to Iran and Israel that this creator. Not to mention that this article is under the category of Zionist political violence which is not supported by information in this article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Middle East, Iran, and Israel. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a FORK — both POV and REDUNDANT — of Iran–Israel proxy conflict#Assassinations, cyberwarfare and sabotage. As nom mentioned, the tone is highly non-encyclopedic. More importantly, the relevant content is adequately covered in Iran–Israel proxy conflict.

Note that the AfDd list is considerably broader and includes, for example, a terrorism incident in Iran where Iranian authorities blamed Israel, Israel denied involvement, and ISIS claimed responsibility. Such cases do not belong in a table about Iran–Israel operations. Such an accusation can be mentioned in the body of the relevant article. gidonb (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in another Afd of a similar matter: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran-Israel non-political relations. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will take a look there as well. gidonb (talk) 03:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The article is important because When something bad happens, Iran blames Israel Like: Kerman Bombings Farcazo (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote doesn't address the issues with the article nor explain any necessity. Any information like this can be just on the respective articles like the one linked for some reason externally, which is already mentioned on that article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a redundant fork. There are already enough articles covering the same subject. Azuredivay (talk) 06:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iran-Israel non-political relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article. No such definition of non-political relations is defined. All that is here is related to political relations, i.e. bilateral relations. Copied from the Farsi Wikipedia article, which over there no definition of what non-political relations are between two nations.

Some information is already on the main relations article. Suggest deleting this page and should any info is worth keeping be moved over to the main article.

Practically comes off as a fork of the main article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Politics, Middle East, Iran, and Israel. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 1 No such definition of non-political relations - First, for a descriptive title its definition is not required. Second, there is definition, right from dictionary: "non-political" means "not political" --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 2 comes off as a fork - please list what exactly content is forked. "Some" is usually OK. --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 3 All that is here is related to political - Not true. Individual business relations are non-political relations. State regulation of business between two countries may probably classified as political relations, but not exactly, because it affects the possibility of a business to do business in another state. Tariffs will most probably be classified as international relations. --Altenmann >talk 20:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge to Iran–Israel relations#Business and other sections of that main article as relevant. Some of the items here are political-related, others seem fairly minor and don't need to be included. Best to add content to the main article and do a section split when appropriate rather than a separate page like this. Also please learn to use italics and quotation marks properly; they're not in the Farsi article so I'm confused why they are used this way... Reywas92^Talk 21:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Selective merge and subsequent split of Iran–Israel business relations per WP:Summary style. --Altenmann >talk 22:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into the appropriate sections of Iran–Israel relations. Sushidude21! (talk) 10:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (selective) into the appropriate sections of Iran–Israel relations. The AfDd article has a negatively defined scope which should been a huge red warning sign. gidonb (talk) 04:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jerusalem Post Lite

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fully unsourced since 2012, full of promotional material which was likely copied from their website. I was unable to find any significant coverage of this newspaper. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Israel. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (selectively) into The Jerusalem Post#Products and services, where the JPost Lite is missing entirely. Our article is an unjustified SPINOUT. A selective merge would fix that, plus function as a fine ATD. gidonb (talk) 04:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into The Jerusalem Post#Products and services per nom. मल्ल (talk) 03:40, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-Israelis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a bit of WP:SYNTH, since there is no mention of the term in all but one of the sources. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:08, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Israel. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is plenty of coverage of the concept (see the references already present in the article), but different terms are used, such as Anglo-Saksim. Shalom Horowitz, described as an "Anglo-Israeli lawyer". Move to Anglo-Saksim is one possibility, but Anglo-Israelis is probably preferable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. The term "Anglo-Israelis" turns up in numerous online news outlets, as well as on Google Scholar. In addition, The term "Anglophone Israelis" also turns up in numerous online news outlets, so that might be an alternative name we should consider. I also want to add that I just created a new Category:English-language newspapers published in Israel. Anomalous+0 (talk) 03:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alon Lifshitz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially self-promotional and resume-like. Amigao (talk) 02:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Military, and Israel. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there’s a big chance that reliable BLP-sources do exist. I initially reviewed the page. --Cinder painter (talk) 04:46, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,

This is not a promotional piece. I wrote the article as a software developer with a personal interest in the high-tech industry.

Every piece of information in the article is supported by a reliable source.

In my view, the article is well written, if any improvements are needed, I’d be happy to receive specific feedback.רעיתו (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This sounds like a perfectly OK bio. Not promotional sounding. Decently sourced.Simxaraba (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per above. 🟥⭐ ^{talk to me!} 05:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan

Wael Al-Masri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article. فيصل (talk) 04:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Jordan. فيصل (talk) 04:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Given that an administrator of Arabic Wikipedia believes that notability outside of promotional material has not been established, I am inclined to agree. I cannot validate sourcing in English to any degree that shows notability, and it would require a lot of cleanup to get this page in working order. Nonetheless, I think it could Return to Draftspace. PickleG13 (talk) 04:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: this guy is notable. The article itself definitely needs some work, but the subject himself meets WP:GNG based on the sourcing in the article and elsewhere. [13] [14] [15]. Cremastra (talk) 22:33, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Farouk Yaghmour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no notability. فيصل (talk) 04:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Jordan. فيصل (talk) 04:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Given that an administrator of Arabic Wikipedia believes that notability has not been established, I am inclined to agree. I cannot validate sourcing in English to any degree that shows notability. PickleG13 (talk) 04:19, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of ambassadors of the Philippines to Jordan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A short article that fails WP:NOT and WP:GNG. Its sources are derived from primary entities. Hauskasic (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Philippines, and Jordan. Hauskasic (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NLIST. LibStar (talk) 03:09, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your claim seems to ignore the second paragraph.
"There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists, although non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations are touched upon in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not § Wikipedia is not a directory. Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists."

Ike Lek (talk) 00:37, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - These lists are routine in coverage of all country's diplomatic relations. Ike Lek (talk) 22:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ITSNOTABLE. Please indicate how this meets a notability guideline. LibStar (talk) 23:32, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The original nomination does not indicate how the article fails any notability guideline, as the current sourcing of the page is irrelevant to notability as per WP:NEXIST and length is irrelevant as per WP:CONTN. Moreover, WP:NLIST acknowledges potential exceptions to WP:GNG for certain types of lists. Additionally, the list likely does meet general notability guidelines, as the role of Philippine Ambassador to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is notable, thus a list of people in that would also likely be. I would also argue the an ambassadorship qualifies as an international or national political office in regards to WP:NPOL, if notability of list subjects is being called into question. Ike Lek (talk) 01:07, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:10, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kuwait

Hussain Kankouni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nowhere near notable, don't see the potential in draftification. Geschichte (talk) 06:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Kuwait. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 09:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Poorly-sourced article that only provides social media and primary sources. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:28, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now mentioned references aren't reliable and not having significant coverage to justify its notability. Fade258 (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanon

Dany Haddad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. The added source is just a small mention including a quote and not SIGCOV for meeting WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Lebanon. LibStar (talk) 01:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Based on pictures being accessible and his accomplishments, it feels very likely that coverage will exist. We should actually look in newspaper archives. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per lack of WP:SIGCOV and a clear redirection target. Svartner (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is very difficult to use As-Safir's archives, but they allow you to search his name (that's stories including "Dany Hadad" in the title, but he may be covered under other names such as "Daniel" as well). There's about 10-15 stories with him in the title, some of which I've listed below:

Danny Haddad, Electricity Fencing Champion Al-Safir Source Date: 12/30/1979 Dany Haddad Represents Lebanon in Fencing at the Mediterranean Games Al-Safir Source Date: 1979/8/3 Dany Haddad, Lebanese Fencing Champion Al-Safir Source Date: 1982/1/4 Dany Haddad, Independence Fencing Champion Al-Safir Source Date: 1986/12/5 Dany Haddad Wins the Expatriates Fencing Cup Al-Safir Source Date: 1980/2/15 Dany Haddad Wins the Christmas Cup in Fencing Al-Safir Source Date: 1980/12/29 Dany Haddad places 37th in the Canada Fencing Championship Source: As-Safir Date: May 2, 1987

Lebanese Fencing Championship: 22 competitors, Danny Haddad first Source: As-Safir Date: March 30, 1980

I haven't looked at all of them – only a few have worked for me, but there looks to be enough to write something decent here, and remember, all these stories were found only by looking at one paper. Lebanon has many papers, and the odds that those other papers wouldn't have covered him further, given what we know, is very small. The Newsday has some bits that could be used to expand as well. If kept, I'll expand this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, we need at least one other source since these results come from the same paper, but this is a very promising start. I've tried some searching with his Arabic name but haven't found anything else so far. Let'srun (talk) 14:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, the Newsday article appears to be more about the subjects father. Let'srun (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above source review. Kingsif (talk) 11:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christelle Bedran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clear fail of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, contested prod. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Middle East, and Lebanon. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:15, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, sources (such as [16]) are enough to demonstrate notability of the subject. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lebanese Football Association is a primary website. One source is not enough to demonstrate notability, even if it contains IRS SIGCOV. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:48, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FA Lebanon is not the Lebanese Football Association. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:07, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:21, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep—Although I recognize that FA Lebanon is not the Lebanese Football Association, and thus I believe the above source is valid, I'm not sure it's enough to bring this article fully into WP:SIGCOV compliance. That said, if we take the policy exactly by its letter, I think this article creeps barely over the line. Anwegmann (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:39, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

April 2023 Israel rocket attacks (via WP:PROD on 12 September 2003)

Oman

Palestine

As'ad Abu Shari'a

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There is no significant coverage of him expect for his assasination. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Palestine. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 20:31, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:36, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is a leader of a very underrated group in the war in Gaza, his death and his leadership of the Mujahideen Brigades are important. Farcazo (talk) 23:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: First of all the article is not about just an ordinary Palestine Militant. He is the Leader of both Palestinian Mujahideen Movement and its armed wing Mujahideen Brigades since 2007, so saying someone who had led a major militant group in Gaza for more than a decade is unjustifiable. He is a high value target according to Israel and have participation and leadership role in the Nir'oz attack and kidnapping of Shiri bibas and family both of the event have its own wikipedia article and As'ad Abu Shari'a and his group have been mentioned many times in these articles andsnews reports.

It is true he received widespread recognition only after his assassination but reports of him have been in the internet since 2007 and many reports only came after Assassination is due to the secrecy of the group protecting its leader.

The article was made after his assassination but it does not his notability and participation in the Gaza War. Similarly, articles like

Mohammad Kazemi, Mehdi Rabbani, Hassan Mohaqeq, Gholamreza Mehrabi have been made in the ongoing Israel –Iran war only after their Assassination.

So I hope both the both deletion claimed editor and other editors understand the need in keeping the page. Golem469 (talk) 06:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He was the leader of an important group of an important war. Yesyesmrcool (talk) 23:09, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E the figure is relatively unknown except for being killed. The article should be deleted. Iljhgtn (talk) 03:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: AfD EC-protected per WP:PIA.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 16:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - he was implicated in a felony murder - the Kidnapping and killing of the Bibas family - that got months-long, wall-to-wall coverage in Israel and New York City. Bearian (talk) 01:19, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there a reason this shouldn't be redirected there? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:56, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Review

Proposed deletions

Templates

Redirects

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: retarget

</noinclude>

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

AfD debates

Adel Aljabrin

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since the last AfD, we're now a lot stricter on notability. Simply competing in the Olympics (and getting a low position of 83) is not enough. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 04:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Saudi Arabia. LibStar (talk) 04:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Yasir

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some mentions, Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Terrorism, and Iraq. Shellwood (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Saudi Arabia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no independent source found agree with nom--Unclethepoter (talk) 21:34, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a munshi, like a cantor or chancellor in other Abrahamic religions, is not automatically notable, and there's a lack of reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 01:35, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles with proposed deletion tags

Syria

Turkish-Syrian Border Clashes (1938)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without improvement. The one current source which can be searched produced zero in-depth coverage of this subject. Searches also turned up zero in-depth sourcing about this. As it stands, there isn't enough sourcing to pass WP:VERIFY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:35, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of ethnic cleansing by Kurdish forces in northern Syria (2015–2016)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like AI and is created by a user who recently got indeffed for creating hoaxes. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Average kurd and DataNomad, again 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Discrimination, Events, Military, and Syria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:21, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep only if WP:RS are found. Wynwick55gl (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Syrian civil war#Kurdish autonomy in northeastern Syria. Sources on this topic can be easily found ([17], [18], [19]), though the oddly-specific title is concerning. Article needs work but the topic is clearly notable. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: While no consensus for delete, neither is there consensus for keep - further contributions would be useful - does the topic actually warrant a stand alone page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 12:54, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because Wynwick55gl, who commented above, has since been checkuser-indeffed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Southern Syria bombings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, insignificant bombing in Syria, likely does not warrant an article. Ecrusized (talk) 11:41, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Mangoe (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
this was made way after the bombing and is up to date. JaxsonR (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it is the first attack by ISIS against the Syrian Transitional Goverment JaxsonR (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Southern Syria clashes (April–May 2025), which is currently a hodgepodge of reporting about clashes involving the panoply of Israeli, Druze, and Syrian forces, and where this would fit in context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longhornsg (talk • contribs) 16:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is one of the first attacks by the Islamic State against the Syrian government after the fall of Assad Farcazo (talk) 22:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Pretty Useless Yesyesmrcool (talk) 03:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this was a useless comment, at least put effort lmao JaxsonR (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Southern Syria clashes (April–May 2025). I agree with the WP:NOTNEWS assertion, and I think the target article is better-suited for the information contained here.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:16, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
that doesnt even make sense, ISIS wasnt even involved in the clashes to begin with. JaxsonR (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i am removing that JaxsonR (talk) 20:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey

International Coordination of Revolutionary Parties and Organizations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since this article was created in 2011, it has been based almost entirely on citations to sources either from the ICOR itself or from its affiliate members. Attempts to find coverage in reliable secondary source turned up very little. Neither of the cited secondary sources in this article provide significant coverage, only giving the ICOR a passing reference in the wider context of another subject. A cursory Google Scholar search brought up a few self-published Marxist word documents, and one book about German political parties that only mentions the ICOR in passing.

As I have been unable to find significant coverage of this international organisation in reliable sources, and as notability is not inherited from any of its affiliated organisations, I do not think this meets the notability criteria for organisations and am nominating it for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa, Tunisia, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Iran, India, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and United States of America. Grnrchst (talk) 09:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I believe there may be a language / coverage issue, as this is English Wikipedia, and there are two or three English-speaking organizations within ICOR. I will look into it this week. Castroonthemoon (talk) 21:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Most online sources I found were either non-independent or were not in-depth. The one book cited in the article was written by Stefan Engel, former chairman of the MLPD, a member organization of ICOR. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not looking good for significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have looked into international reports on the organization. There's a surprising amount of information surrounding the group's involvement in Syria, and the hospital that the group built. Castroonthemoon (talk) 05:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning towards Keep Castroonthemoon (talk) 05:30, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unless Castroonthemoon can cite specific sources with significant coverage, I'm leaning delete. The only mention in Swiss media is [20]. Toadspike [Talk] 08:55, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mehmet Kâmil Berk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only found one other reference on a Google search and it didn't seem like he did much that would warrant meeting notability standards. Being the doctor to a notable person isn't enough to establish notability on its own. Orphan article now for several years, so additional information is probably not likely. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 02:57, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The argument for deletion makes sense, and there is no notability established seemingly in any language. On English Wikipedia, it is especially challenging to source an article where there is not significant notability in English language sources. PickleG13 (talk) 04:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Medicine, and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yaz (EP)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM due to nonexistent SIGCOV for this EP. The sources in the article are primary and do not contribute to establishing notability. It should be converted into a redirect targeting the artist article. Frost 06:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mor ve ötesi: No SIGCOV in RS. No awards, charting or certified gold. Only sources are streaming, lyrics, YT and social media. Some sources in Turkish talk about the song Yaz Yaz Yaz but not the album. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 01:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Association for Liberal Thinking

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was 2006. The only sources provided are its own website (same with the Turkish version of the article). Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Turkey. LibStar (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article editor Qwertyx~enwiki changed their ID years ago. I am not aware if they are an active user. The only two references are from the home page of Association for Liberal Thinking. — Maile (talk) 02:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If they have "~enwiki" in their name, I think that means their account was WP:USURPNAME which started in 2008. – The Grid (talk) 12:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Turkish think tanks; the subject fails WP:ORG for its own article but a search yields enough references that it could be included elsewhere. Surayeproject3 (talk) 01:19, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Is there more support for a Merger or should this article just be Deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hakan Akbas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable if it meets WP:SUSTAINED notability. Amigao (talk) 00:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Akbas appears to have no article on the Turkish Wikipedia (or any other). --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 02:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – He has coverage in national and international media and has appeared as a commentator on major news channels including NTV, CNN, and CNBC. That makes him notable. Here are some links of his appearances in reliable media outlets: [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tacmocc (talk • contribs) 15:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appearing in media does not grant notability. Geschichte (talk) 06:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish-Syrian Border Clashes (1938)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without improvement. The one current source which can be searched produced zero in-depth coverage of this subject. Searches also turned up zero in-depth sourcing about this. As it stands, there isn't enough sourcing to pass WP:VERIFY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:35, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:04, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assyrian-Kurdish Clashes (1840-1895)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks sufficient reliable sources and appears to reflect a non-neutral, possibly partisan narrative. It fails to meet Wikipedia’s standards for notability, sourcing, and neutrality. Much of the content is unsourced or poorly cited, and it presents a historical conflict in a way that seems one-sided, potentially violating Wikipedia's policies on neutrality (WP:NPOV) and verifiability (WP:V). A search for academic or high-quality sources on this specific topic yields very little coverage, suggesting it may not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for historical events (WP:NOTE). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madeaccountfr (talk • contribs) 08:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Middle East. Shellwood (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Check the page now Suraya222 (talk) 11:43, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are some pretty poorly written sections, both from a sourcing standpoint and actual written English (the ones with seemingly random capitalized words are especially jarring to look at), but the article is salveagable and I think there's at least a good chance a good article can be written on the subject. In any case I'm not going to give the benefit of the doubt to the banned (not just blocked!) nominator who is a notoriously bad faith participant. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Iraq, and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Zemen (talk) 16:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.

Jackhanma69 (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' - I don't see the reason for Deletion, And I provided the sources and Made the Page better Suraya222 (talk) 22:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' – if there's another problem, please tell me so I can change it. Suraya222 (talk) 22:20, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

'''Keep''' Suraya222 (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can Anyone Please Tell me how the hell do I type Keep but Bold and Black Suraya222 (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The information is backed by the sources. Assyrians and Kurds had many clashes in Hakkari in the 1800s that are well documented. Termen28 (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. StrongCap (talk) 11:53, 12 June 2025 (UTC) Blocked as a sock. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@StrongCap Explain why you want the page to be deleted Suraya222 (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Suraya222 (talk) 12:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note here that both the nominator Madeaccountfr and voter StrongCap have been blocked as sockpuppets of notorious WP:LTA editor Tishreen07 [29]. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. R3YBOl (🌲) 06:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@R3YBOl could you please Explain Why do you want the page to be deleted? I mean every page I made you wanted it to be deleted Suraya222 (talk) 13:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep -~~ Suraya222 (talk) 15:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think its informative and gives a good overview of Assyrian-Kurdish relations in that period. I can't find any issues with the article that's worth deleting it for.Ilamxan (talk) 16:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

idk why @R3YBOI Want to delete every page i make Suraya222 (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion is a mess. @User:Suraya222, you are only allowed to make one bolded !vote per AfD discussion – please strike the rest. Could we get editors from outside this topic area to weigh in please?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 23:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't know Suraya222 (talk) 15:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you could Suraya222 (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This looks a case of WP:SYNTH as none of the sources discuss this subject in the context of this very specific timescale. Instead it's a bunch of meh sources not addressing the overall subject and being bolted together. That's classic synth and this feels like its either a fork from a wider more general article or should be in a wider history of the conflict if specific sources addressing the conflict as a whole are not available. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What are you even talking about??? Suraya222 (talk) 11:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Suraya222 Please review WP:CIVIL and WP:TALK. The editor raised legitimate policy concerns about WP:SYNTH that deserve a substantive response rather than dismissal. R3YBOl (🌲) 15:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 16:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Others

United Arab Emirates

Six Flags Dubai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A cancelled amusement park with no evidence of having been anything but a concept; was in development hell for ~8 years, and then cancelled in 2019 with no plans to revive it. Fails WP:GNG as it doesn't have many high quality sources talking about it - most sources simply announce the opening or the cancellation of the park. Borderline WP:NOTNEWS. jolielover♥talk 09:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks and United Arab Emirates. jolielover♥talk 09:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cancelled project, not a thing. No notability, enduring impact, continued coverage or likelihood of same. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gucci Hotel (Dubai)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking updates for 15 years; this development project appears to have been abandoned/cancelled, as since 2010, there have been numerous reports of a "first Gucci hotel in Dubai", like [30]. Ultimately no concrete evidence this Hotel was anything more than a thought, since it certainly doesn't exist today. There are a lack of sources on this concept, doesn't pass WP:GNG. jolielover♥talk 05:32, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. jolielover♥talk 05:32, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with fire. No concrete evidence, no concrete poured, no concrete reason for the article's continued existence. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 11:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Plantbaseddiet (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Any time an article created in 2010 still says in 2025 expected to open … by the end of 2010, that indicates either a complete lack of either significant coverage or a lack of any interest in adding any later significant coverage… but usually the former. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Travel and tourism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Well, there was an instagram post [31] last year, so maybe it will open? Whole lot of speculation for something that either never happened, or is going to happen, sometime... Either way, not notable. Oaktree b (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I had a feeling that Gucci, a company known for careful use of its brand, wouldn't slap it onto some black box hotel in Dubai and I was right, Elisabetta has no association with Gucci outside being a distant great-granddaughter and was sued for trademark misuse and like many a Dubai project, this died (though she keeps trying to figure out ways to start it back up again). And an AI image from a promotional Instagram certainly isn't a source. Nathannah • 📮 23:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hotels in Dubai were good enough for Versace, Armani and Bulgari... just sayin' :) Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This has never existed, and the fact that someone once thought of creating it but didn't is not, and never has been, notable. (The article should have been deleted in 2017, in response to a PROD as non-notable, but for some reason Northamerica1000 disagreed.) JBW (talk) 13:20, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Investopia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable. This is a UAE government program created in 2021. There is no independent reliable news coverage of this program. The coverage is solely by news outlets that are propaganda outlets for the UAE government or are prohibited from reporting in any critical or nuanced way on this government program. Thenightaway (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Arab Emirates. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep and improve - Based on global reach and influence as well as participation by notable individuals. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 17:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- What about this program that has existed since 2021 indicates that it has "global reach" and "influence"? There is certainly nothing in this article, which is written like an advertisement, that suggests any such thing. If it's so influential and has such global reach, where is the RS coverage on this organization? Paying notable people to give a speech at a conference does not make the conference notable. Thenightaway (talk) 19:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Boufarhat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article reads somewhat like a resume mixed with a blog, possibly because the subject, per the article, "keeps a low public profile". The references, though 30, are not predominantly about the subject; many are ammouncements about his company, and several others are general articles that mention him in passing. The few sources that are actually about him profile him for having a lot of money, either locally or in Forbes, and are not generally in depth. He does not appear to be personally notable. This is also a problematic WP:BLP, devoting a lot of space to his personal health. FalconK (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and United Kingdom. FalconK (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, United Arab Emirates, England, and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of enduring (or even basic) notability. His brief time in a UAE school didn't really leave any footprints here. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:15, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Coverage exists on plenty of sites to meet WP:BASIC. Check 1, 2, 3, 4. Mysecretgarden (talk) 09:04, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not in agreement. This is a lot of by-the-numbers reporting that is mostly not about the subject. The most that can be said about him from all 4 sources is that he sold a company. FalconK (talk) 09:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of significant coverage - and if he keeps a low profile, then maybe he doesn't want to be a public figure. Bearian (talk) 00:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of hospitals in the United Arab Emirates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NLIST, is contrary to WP:NOTDIRECTORY. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 04:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Organizations, Medicine, and United Arab Emirates. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 04:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:58, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment There are lists for most nations; I'm not seeing how this one is necessarily different from the rest. Mangoe (talk) 21:18, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd point to WP:OTHER if anyone has similar thoughts. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine if you wish to propose this as a test case for deleting the lot (which I wouldn't oppose), but otherwise I think an explanation how this one is going to be worse than the others is in order. Mangoe (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 05:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Deleting this article would have to set a precedent for other "List of hospitals in (country)" articles, the bulk of which likely have very wide differences in their sourcing and structure. Compare Kenya and Japan in this instance. I don't think deleting the article is the best solution, so if I was voting, I would say keep the article. But I think there would need to be a larger discussion surrounding these lists to determine whether a bulk deletion is needed if the request passes. Surayeproject3 (talk) 01:29, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A lot of these should probably be deleted. There are worse sourced ones like List of hospitals in Ivory Coast. Most of these could be handled by categories. Metallurgist (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Healthcare in the United Arab Emirates. killer bee  15:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of a merge seems, strange, how would that work? And do note that all hospitals that are on that list which have an article will still exist in Category:Hospitals in the United Arab Emirates. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merging should work because some of these hospitals are notable and have their own articles. Mentioning them on Healthcare in the United Arab Emirates would be fine. killer bee  17:08, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yemen

Ehab Fuad Ahmed Nagi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded this and content was merged like this South Yemen at the 1988 Summer Olympics#Ehab Fuad Ahmed Nagi. It should be a plain redirect if that is desired. More discussion at WP:COUNTRYATOLYBIO. This individual fails WP:SPORTSCRIT so my preference is delete. LibStar (talk) 02:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Yemen. LibStar (talk) 02:25, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Almost entirely unsourced. This would be a great redirect article, but not one of its own. PickleG13 (talk) 04:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom, this subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:SPORTSCRIT. The only source is a database and I couldn't find anything better to support notability. Let'srun (talk) 14:09, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to South Yemen at the 1988 Summer Olympics#Athletics – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to South Yemen at the 1988 Summer Olympics#Athletics per Svartner, as we have done with many other AfD nominations of Olympic participants. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Middle East

Country deletion sorting

Bahrain

Bahrain Proposed deletions

Egypt

Egypt Proposed deletions

Iran

Iran Proposed deletions

Iraq

Israel

Jordan

Kuwait

Lebanon

Proposed deletions

Oman

Palestine

Deletion Review

Proposed deletions

Templates

Categories

Redirects

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

AfD debates

Articles with proposed deletion tags

Syria

Turkey

Others

United Arab Emirates

Yemen