Jump to content

User talk:Altenmann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page was last edited or modified by Altenmann (talk).
/////////\///\//\///\//\ \//\/
{{Family name hatnote}} {{Not a typo}} {{typo}} efn notelist {rp|993} {Rp|page=199} {{la|Pug} [Template:uw-ew]]
{{wide image|Uvs Nuur drainage basin.jpg|700px|Ubs}
wazzup

-

List of abbreviations (help):
D
Edit made at Wikidata
r
Edit flagged by ORES
N
New page
m
Minor edit
b
Bot edit
(±123)
Page byte size change

4 April 2025

neuedit

-

  neublatter

4 April 2025

3 April 2025

-


Nonsense at Pseudo-mythology

[edit]

I see you're attempting to restore this page, which is extremely poorly sourced and full of nonsense, such as claims that the reconstruction of *Ostara falls into this category (we have an entire, well-sourced article on this topic at Ēostre). I suggest that you become more familiar with the fundamentals of historical linguistics and folklore studies before proceeding. :bloodofox: (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bloodofox: There is no need do wrangle against each other. I think the article merits existence. So let use invite others to say a word in merge suggestion. --Altenmann >talk 23:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Victory Banner

[edit]

In this case, is it a good idea to mention what is presumably the ethnicity of the three soldiers? I do not see the ethnicity mentioned in all three articles, nor is it sourced in the article. It is mentioned in Raising a Flag over the Reichstag, but the mention of Berest is not there, and I took a look at all of the cited sources there and none of them referred to the ethnicity of those soldiers, so this has failed verification in that regard. Although they were born within the modern-day borders, I am not sure if there is any dispute about the ethnicity. This is why I think it generally makes more sense to only refer to the nationality, since references to ethnicity often leads to disputes. Mellk (talk) 08:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mellk: I know about the problems of ethnicity vs. nationality in Wikipedia. However in this case this was a point of Soviet propaganda: an illustration of the "friendship of the peoples". I will try to find sources to this end, meanwhile I self-revert, because without explanation it looks meaningless indeed. --Altenmann >talk 09:37, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean. I think this would be better suited in the Raising a Flag over the Reichstag article, perhaps? I tend to agree that mentioning the ethnicity without explanation is best avoided. Mellk (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brest Region

[edit]

This RM may interest you. Mellk (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My edit on Islam in India was reverted

[edit]

I noticed you reverted my edit on Islam in India. Plural “Shias” is more natural and makes more sense than “Shia.” Also, the rest of your summary did not make sense and wasn’t necessary.

Also, I don’t think the “neighborhoods in Vilnius” should be linked until the article is created and meets notability status. I do accept your revert in the sandbox heading. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 07:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreed. Please gain some experience in editing Wikipedia before making formal decisions in non-transparent situations. --Altenmann >talk 07:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robots of Stanisław Lem

[edit]

I'm sorry but did you forget the conversation we had on this exact topic previously? Just open a move discussion if you have an actual rationale for this! Orchastrattor (talk) 02:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Polyushko-pole

[edit]

Did you read the sentence where it says "under the title "Song of the Plains". Apparently not. AMCKen (talk) 06:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Enterprises in the Soviet Union can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Edit summaries and talk pages are not supposed to host uncivil comments and threats (Go away, ... or I report you for disruption). This is not acceptable. Learn the guidelines, and eventually how to behave in a civil community, as long as you can. Thanks!
Going back to encyclopedic stuff (Enterprises in the Soviet Union): I'm not saying you must improve your English, but the article was clearly written in bad English (feel free to let us know what's the point of alternating spellings like "enterprises" and "enterprizes" in the same text btw) and there are lots of untranslated Russian words which you didn't even tag with {{Lang}} templates. You definitely have to do better, and I'm pretty sure you could. We will not condone such a bad attitude forever.
 – Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 02:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS. I just read on your userpage –out of curiosity– that you're not a native English speaker, and I'd like to point out I didn't know; don't assume I was making fun of your English. I was not; I didn't even know, as I only found out now. Take your time to improve the page, but please tag and translate all of the Russian text, and fix references. Have a good day, Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 03:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am disinclined to acquiesce your threats and advices. Wikipedia is a cooperative project. I wasted plenty of my life to fill a gap in knowledge provided in Wikipedia and don't tell me what to do next. Out of sheer nastiness, I am removing this article from my watchlist. You may slap seven more tags on top of this page, I no longer care. --Altenmann >talk 19:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based Historian 1122 moved to ANI

[edit]

Hi Altenmann, I have moved the AIV report to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Based Historian 1122 because it's not the obvious vandalism usually handled quickly there. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Mani (prophet)

[edit]

A few thoughts... First, I was surprised to see my !vote reverted, but then saw it must have been some form of an edit conflict, as you appear to intended to revert the edit before mine. I was even surprised to see my edit was posted without a warning that the article changed while I was editing using the reply-editor, I thought those things were not supposed to happen. But I'm glad to see that you restored my edits properly. Thank you. However, I was a bit surprised to see you simply reopen someone elses RM closure. I was pretty sure that is strongly discouraged, and that you should talk to that editor and/or use the move review process. TiggerJay (talk) 07:44, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tiggerjay: I am pretty sure that non-admin closures are fair game in the non-evident cases and in such situations longer waiting time is strongly encouraged. BTW, I notified the closer (although post-factum, I admit). And since there was no move, "move review" makes no sense. I could have simply opened another discussion, but I thought it would be silly. --Altenmann >talk 07:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have no real dog in this fight, because having it open longer is no problem for me. But my understanding of policy is if an administrator notices a clearly improper [RMNAC] move closure, they should revert the closure and re-open the discussion. (emphasis added) However, I would agree as long as there isn't contentiousness between you and the original closure, no harm is really done. However also for clarification WP:MR is for any/all contested close of Wikipedia page move discussions and thus any closure (NAC or not, moved or not) is fair game for RM.
Regardless of all of that, the biggest reason I brought it up was the first point where I was surprised the edit conflict occurred for both of us, I wonder if there was some sort of rare database lag or something. TiggerJay (talk) 08:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vrbic (disambiguation)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vrbic (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because

  • it is a disambiguation page which either
  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • it is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" whose target is neither a disambiguation page nor page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pages in Category:Wikipedia years as part of WikiProject Wikipedia

[edit]

Hi. I noticed you reverted my reassessment of the pages in Category:Wikipedia years as not being within the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia. Our WikiProject has a limited scope, which only includes: The Outline of Wikipedia and everything listed in it; articles on subjects directly related to Wikipedia; articles on each edition of Wikipedia; articles on Wikipedians who are notable for being involved with Wikipedia; and other Wikipedia-related articles, especially in Category:Wikipedia or its subcategories. Because the pages in question are project pages, not articles, I assessed that they don't fall within the scope of the WikiProject. Does that sound right to you, or do you have a different view? Also, I noticed you're not on our register of WikiProject Wikipedia participants. Would you like to be? Bsherr (talk) 04:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bsherr: Goals:Category:Wikipedia, Scope:Articles on subjects directly related to Wikipedia

My pages are as directly related to Wikipedia as they can be and I thoroughly surprized that since 2005 only a handful of people contributed to them. It looks like nobody but me, even wikignomes, cares about detailed chronology of Wikipedia. No I am not among participants, because quite a few old-timers treat me with annoyance if not animosity (maybe rightly so, still, I see no reason of fraternizing with them). --Altenmann >talk 04:40, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. Yes, I understand that they are related to Wikipedia. Of course, the entirety of the Wikipedia:Project namespace is related to Wikipedia. But WikiProject Wikipedia is concerned with improving articles, not pages in the project namespace. Do you follow the distinction? --Bsherr (talk) 04:45, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bsherr: Sorry, I didnt pay attention. I agree with your arguments now. --Altenmann >talk 04:51, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nae Nae

[edit]

Why would you remove the nae nae gif? It’s an educational, visual tool for learning how to perform it properly. I now have no frame of reference when explaining to someone how to perform the nae nae. Please rectify your mistake. 67.129.28.178 (talk) 14:43, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@67.129.28.178:. Because it was uploaded by an unknown person, of unknown dance expertise, and some editors say this is not how nae nae is danced. All information in Wikipedia must be supplied with references to reliable sources. --Altenmann >talk 14:46, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tartakovsky redirect

[edit]

Hi there, thanks for sorting out the confusion on the Tartakovsky page. I recently became a new pages patroller and am still getting to grips with it all, sometimes make mistakes. Congratulations for holding the really random honour of authoring the 500,000th wiki article in 2005! Regards, Rodney Baggins...talk🧑🏻 19:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question about an edit for the article "Russian political jokes"

[edit]

Hello ! I have a question about an edit on the article "Russian political jokes".

My question is about your edit dated "FEB/10/2025" at "23:15 UTC+00:00".
I don't understand why did you removed the internal link I added about "Nancy Reagan".

Concerning yours others edits on the article made in the day of "FEB/10/2025".
I have nothing to say as you did improved the article and removed things not referenced.

PS : You're working on this article since 2007. Nearly 20 years. Congratulations ! Anatole-berthe (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Anatole-berthe: Knowing that the wife was Nancy Reagan adds nothing to the joke and the blue link at the word "wife" is only a distraction from reading the article, so I felt to remove it. Otherwise it is harmless. --Altenmann >talk 16:56, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your answer ! Anatole-berthe (talk) 23:58, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ben-Atar

[edit]

I don't think that Ben-Atar needs a separate article when it's basically the same surname as Benatar but with a hyphen added. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 18:26, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AllTheUsernamesAreInUse: These surname do have the same origin, but they are not the same surname, just as Smith and Smyth have different pages or see:
--Altenmann >talk 05:23, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

[edit]

Hi, you reverted an edit that I made but you didn't say why you reverted it. I had changed a list of awards into a paragraph. What was the issue? Thanks. Qflib (talk) 22:27, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't revert my edits

[edit]

@Altenmann Do not revert my edits to the Áo dài post, this is a non-vandalism edit. 2402:9D80:330:9254:4D2B:2FCE:D5A0:56B (talk) 04:29, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hana Zagorová discography for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hana Zagorová discography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hana Zagorová discography (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 03:27, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating citation from Great Soviet Encyclopedia

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating citation from Great Soviet Encyclopedia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:26, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bucks County

[edit]

Hi. I suspect Bucks County is correct. But how do we know? Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christine_Rawak&diff=1279467874&oldid=1279442675 2603:7000:2101:AA00:594B:C3C6:7E11:4759 (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@2603:7000:2101:AA00:594B:C3C6:7E11:4759: she attended high school there, in Council Rock School District, otherwise I don't really care. You may post a note in Talk:Christine Rawak. --Altenmann >talk 20:48, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Right. I saw that. I was just hesitant to make the jump myself. Though I think that's a reasonable guess. --2603:7000:2101:AA00:594B:C3C6:7E11:4759 (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Painter

[edit]

Why did you assume that it even pretended to represent "the way as our ancestors imagined it"? Do you have confirmation of that for the other, recognisable artist? And how such an argument can be valid in case of fakelore, which wasn't imagined by our ancestors at all? This is not a proper argument against those works. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Makhnovist" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Makhnovist has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 13 § Makhnovist until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:41, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replied.

[edit]

So because I'm an IP editor, my proposal is rejected? I fail to see how this reasoning is valid. Replied on my talk page with my own reasoning, which I ask you to consider. 108.160.120.147 (talk) 17:56, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Evgeny Lukin

[edit]

Hello Altenmann! Would you mind helping me with this article?
Draft:Evgeny Lukin
In Russian: Лукин, Евгений Юрьевич --Любитель свежего воздуха (talk) 23:58, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Sub-disambiguation"?

[edit]

There is no such concept in Wikipedia. See WP:INCOMPDAB. We do not do this, because it creates the misleading impression that the title is an actually disambiguated topic in itself. BD2412 T 19:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Svyatoslav Loginov

[edit]

You may wish to improve this article: Svyatoslav Loginov --Любитель свежего воздуха (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are anti refugees?

[edit]

We support Myanmar refugees to live to in Thailand but you are Evil Nazi Polish. Why support Right wing in Thailand why we can’t helped Myanmar refugees https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/11/04/poland-now-a-land-of-immigration-tightens-up-its-migration-policy_6731460_4.html 2001:FB1:18E:60E8:11B5:469E:6823:6B5C (talk) 17:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and talk pages in articles are for discussion of the articles, not for political struggles. --Altenmann >talk 17:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Israel's War of Independence --> 1948 Palestine war

[edit]

As you correctly noted here, I change Israel's War of Independence to what it is redirected to, namely 1948 Palestine war. Btw; I have been reported to WP:AE, when I didn't use the "official" wp name, even when a source used another name (link). So no: "in articles about Israeli people Wikipedia must use Israeli term," is not correct, IMO. Please take it to WP:ARCA if you disagree, cheers, Huldra (talk) 20:26, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Huldra: : I withdrew my notice, right? My concern was that Israel's War of Independence is not exactly the same as 1948 Palestine war, even skipping the political bias, just the same as Nakba is not the same, although it is loosely used to refer to the 1948 Palestine war. I don't want to go into detail and don't bother to work on this; let me just mention, as an analogy, we have Great Patriotic War --> Eastern Front (World War II), but at the same time we have Great Patriotic War (term) to explain the usage of the term in the Soviet Union and in Soviet nostalgia. Happy editing, --Altenmann >talk 00:13, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Altenmann&oldid=1283844091"