Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 1947inYamama (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- 103.46.201.181 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Bbarebiese (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:403:c001:8910:9025:da51:752d:716e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:58, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Wistherdisc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Repeated POV-pushing edits on Australian political articles, including Liberal Party of Australia, Australian Labor Party and Peter Dutton, disregarding process and garnering a slew of warnings on their talk page, as well as continuing on their course despite warnings on other matters including (not) citing reliable sources and causing formatting errors. Will Thorpe (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- AIV is for obvious vandals. Please request assistance at WP:ANI. Izno (talk) 07:12, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Willthorpe GMH Melbourne (talk) 07:51, 8 April 2025
- AIV is for obvious vandals. Please request assistance at WP:ANI. Izno (talk) 07:12, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- 148.252.129.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) recently blocked disruptive ip range continues to make edits. Magherbin (talk) 10:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- 185.122.134.127 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently vandalizing pages. Galaxybeing (talk) 12:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: High level of persistent IP vandalism post-expiry of recent temporary protection. Senapatiji (talk) 🏴☠️ 01:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 117.248.34.14 (talk · contribs) blocked by Izno. Also, the page has never been protected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Daily disruption by new, single purpose accounts. ATP is a neo-nazi group and these new accounts uniformly want to obscure that. RKT7789 (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 07:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Active politician, persistent vandalism. Requesting protection until 3 May (the day of the election) GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 10:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 10:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: semi-protection Abel maleikia akilei macha (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Declined See Wikipedia:UPROT; User-pages are automagically semi-protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Hello,
I would like to request semi-protection or extended protection for this article. There have been repeated edits attempting to alter the cultural and religious identity of Gabon, claiming it is a “Muslim country” and that certain ethnic groups from West Africa (such as the Hausa) are indigenous to Gabon.
These claims are historically inaccurate and do not reflect the recognized demographics of the country. Gabon is a predominantly Christian and animist nation, and while there has been economic immigration from neighboring countries, including from Muslim communities, this does not redefine the national identity or native heritage of the Gabonese people.
These edits appear to be part of a coordinated effort to reframe Gabon’s identity and history in ways that are not supported by sources or historical consensus. It could be considered a form of ethno-religious revisionism, which goes against Wikipedia’s standards of neutrality and verifiability.
I kindly request protection of the page to prevent further biased or disruptive edits.
Thank you.
Islam in Gabon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Gabon Hello,
I would like to request semi-protection or extended protection for this article. There have been repeated edits attempting to alter the cultural and religious identity of Gabon, claiming it is a “Muslim country” and that certain ethnic groups from West Africa (such as the Hausa) are indigenous to Gabon.
These claims are historically inaccurate and do not reflect the recognized demographics of the country. Gabon is a predominantly Christian and animist nation, and while there has been economic immigration from neighboring countries, including from Muslim communities, this does not redefine the national identity or native heritage of the Gabonese people.
These edits appear to be part of a coordinated effort to reframe Gabon’s identity and history in ways that are not supported by sources or historical consensus. It could be considered a form of ethno-religious revisionism, which goes against Wikipedia’s standards of neutrality and verifiability.
I kindly request protection of the page to prevent further biased or disruptive edits.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabonese Bantu (talk • contribs) 08:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done – Article is not protected, obviously, since you have edited it. Favonian (talk) 08:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 11:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Can I have autopatrolled rights re granted, as they have now expired? Thank you! SDGB1217 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Prolific creator of biography articles who appears to understand the notability guidelines. My random selection of articles they had recently created showed no other issues of note, though I would recommend they create associated talk pages for their work. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Dracophyllum is a user that has been creating lists and articles largely related to the flora of New Zealand and the surrounding landmasses. Several of these have been brought to GA level and at least one to FA (Dracophyllum fiordense) from scratch. They have been around for a little while; their works are well-developed in sandboxes prior to publishing in mainspace, and need little attention once published. Reconrabbit 01:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I want to be active on English Wikipedia more. I am a trusted global user. So I want the flag of this user group. Janabaevazizbek (talk) 11:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Citation and grammar edits Czarking0 (talk) 04:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
I'm currently working on some general maintenance of articles related to the theory of general relativity and would like some extra tools for automatic syntax fixing, etc. Some articles like this one could use some semi-automated tender love and care. A recent rewrite I did here might improve with some finishing touches too. ScienceDawns (talk) 08:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
I feel like I've improved as an editor since my rights were revoked in July 2024 (due to a long series of impulsive mistakes I made and not checking my work hard enough), and since I last tried to apply in November 2024. I've tried slowing down on the editing, especially with Rater, as Pppery pointed out. Anyway, the main reason why I wanted to reapply for AWB is because cleaning up Category:Pages using infobox Russian inhabited locality with unknown parameters has been rather tedious; I recently found a bunch of unnecessary parameters (most notably, "date") that I believe can be removed more efficiently if I had access to the application. However, I will try to remove parameters (or use AWB in general) as a last resort (like if the params are truly redundant), and instead try to fix them if possible. OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting access to AWB to help me efficiently fix typos and clean up articles that I find with the "random article" button. AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 21:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
can I use AutoWikiBrowser on the English Wikipedia. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 05:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
It is to following things in malayalam wikipedia such as correct common typos and grammatical errors, Standardizing article formatting and layout and Updating outdated links and references. Akbarali (talk) 03:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
I would like to use AutoWikiBrowser for adding wikilinks to articles. I might also use it for fixing typos. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 04:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser to edit Wikipedia and help fix minor and major errors with automated programming, I feel like I could do a lot more with it than just regular editing. Valorrr (talk) 21:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Use regular expressions to find and replace wikitext on football club season articles, in order to comply with MOS:FLAG Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
I want to get into rewriting articles more (most of my edits are vandalism reverting and PCR) AWB, will be able to help me make larger and accurate contributions, with great speed. I understand many en-Wikipedia policies through RCP and have gathered the privilege of rollback and pending changes reviewing through my several hundred contributions. Thanks and happy editing! twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 18:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Interested in clearing out some of the categories in Category:Template parameter issues by task. I have experience with other automated editing software, like WP:STiki and WP:HUGGLE. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 23:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Requesting access mostly to perform reference/grammar edits. Brent Silby (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
I am a librarian who will be running an editathon for my small liberal arts college on April 3rd and 4th from 9-4:30 PM. This is the third year we have done this, but I am new to the position and the event. Let me know if you need any other information from me. Librarian Daireon (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, explaining briefly: I would like to be able to contribute in this area. Thanks in advance. JacktheBrown (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the New Page Reviewer user right. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since May 2022 and have made a variety of edits, including content creation, copyediting, and reverting vandalism. I have also patrolled recent changes and worked on improving articles related to history, Type 1 diabetes, and various general topics. Additionally, I understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, reliable sourcing requirements, and article layout conventions. I am familiar with the CSD and AfC, as well as most other things. Thank you for considering my request. MallardTV Talk to me! 03:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’d like to request NPR right for a 45 day trial. I’m familiar with key policy WP:N, WP:V, WP:NPOV, and deletion criteria, CSD, PROD, & AfD. I want to test myself with this role and help reduce the backlog by reviewing new pages carefully and in line with Wiki guidelines. Oxiyam.Primal (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I am applying for the new page reviewer role because I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.Jeremiah Msaziri (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I'm an experienced editor with years of history on Wikipedia and I've recently been getting more into page moving (mostly to fix disambiguation-related issues). The issue is that increasingly I see that a redirect already exists at the intended destination, so it would be very helpful for me to have the page mover permission so I can resolve these issues efficiently. I have moved over 500 pages so far and have initiated several requested moves as well. I don't intend to engage in any controversial moves and if any of mine are contested I'll immediately revert and go to RM. Thanks, Habst (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I've been editing for a long time and understand Wikipedia's policies and goals. I especially like to help out at pages which have a lot of enthusiastic edits by knowledgeable people who might not understand Wikipedia's format and goals, making them perfect candidates for pending changes protection. I think pending changes reviewer rights would be the perfect way to help separate the wheat from the chaff and help our newest editors participate and make a difference while maintaining our high standards. Bruhpedia (talk) 20:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
I need the Pending changes right, I patrol through serval articles on Wikipedia Atimes I’m experienced, without much been said, I want to support. Chippla360 (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
I have read the WP:PCCRITERIA and I believe that I meet them. I sometimes see pending edits waiting for approval on articles, and I believe that I could do this job myself. wojtekpolska1013 [talk page] 09:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
I have encountered instances where the ability to review pending changes to articles would prove useful in the prevention of vandalism and would help changes in good faith be accepted more quickly. Having the pending changes reviewer right would allow me to assist new editors with learning the formatting and customs of Wikipedia, and allow me to more effectively prevent vandalism and disruption to articles. I have read all policy regarding the pending changes reviewer right. Thank you for your consideration. wafflerrs talk! 02:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I have taken up patrolling recent changes and clear vandalism prevension / sourceless BLP-edits in en-wiki too. I have enough experience of the tool through fi-wiki, where I am a rollbacker, pending changes reviewer and ”page stabilzer” (I think the group closest to it here was called editor?). I know I have under 200 edits too now, but my interest at the time here is vandalism prevention which is hard and takes multiple edits (causes spam in recent changes) without rollback-tool. I would ask for sysops to look at my well trusted global status and experience. Thank you! Osmo Lundell (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting rollback rights to help combat vandalism and disruptive edits more effectively. I have been patrolling recent changes for the past 30 days, focusing on identifying and reverting vandalism, test edits, and other unconstructive changes. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies, including WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, and WP:NPOV. I really wanted to improve Wikipedia by my small contribution. I understand the importance of using rollback responsibly. This permission would allow me to respond more efficiently to inappropriate edits. I want to also say that I made some silly mistakes in the starting of my patrolling. However, I learnt from them and make sure that they won't happen again. Such as reverting edits that are already reverted, that mistakes you can see on my past contributions. Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if any additional information is needed. ⚡ VortexPhantom • Talk 07:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
I would like to use rollback perms to more effectively fight vandals on Wikipedia, I am hoping to use Huggle to do this. 𝕟𝕪𝕖𝕦𝕓𝕚𝕞 (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request rollback rights to help fight vandalism more effectively. I've been actively reverting clear cases of vandalism using Twinkle. I have over 2000 edits and am familiar with relevant policies. Calmkelp talk 05:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to try some other counter-vandalism tools, such as AntiVandal, Huggle, and SWViewer, which require the rollback right to use. I've actively been patrolling recent changes for roughly 3-4 months and have consistently warned editors when reverting them. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
I am a decently experienced user who primarily works on sports-related articles. In this time, I've come across Template talk:College athlete recruit end which requires edits, but appears to have been abandoned, as my message from last year was never addressed. I have made edits within the sandbox, but don't expect them to be responded to. poketape (talk) 06:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |