Jump to content

Template:Admin dashboard

Permanently protected template
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 107
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 22
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 10
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 97
Requested RD1 redactions 1
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 4
Open sockpuppet investigations 74
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 6
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 6 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 667 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 147 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: The article is being repeatedly edited by unregistered users who are adding unsourced, promotional, or irrelevant content. Despite multiple cleanups and warnings, the disruptive edits continue. Requesting semi-protection to maintain article quality and stability. Cognifex (talkcontribs) 12:45, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 17:50, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated speedy deletion tag vandalism by multiple IPs. Was unprotected on 14 June and vandalism has been pretty frequent since 25 June. TTWIDEE (talk) 17:51, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Consistent NPOV editing by anon editors, inserting the same phrases every time (eg. (Special:Diff/1295152057, Special:Diff/1300633066, Special:Diff/1295158142), been doing this for months (eg. older examples: Special:Diff/1280198564, Special:Diff/1285491622, Special:Diff/1289595173, Special:Diff/1289698905). It's been protected twice before, could this be a longer-term protection this time. BugGhost 🦗👻 18:12, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 18:16, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent low-quality edits by IP users Safety In Obscurity (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One IP user, two days ago. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Should be upgraded to semi-protection since the vandals are still at it wasting pending changes reviewers time. TylerBurden (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: No vandalism or disruption in the page history 2A01:E0A:F07:B500:356F:4826:B046:5314 (talk) 15:07, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Topic has attracted recurring disruption, due to page moves it is in one of the disambiguated pages now. — xaosflux Talk 15:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Unprotection: No longer nessecary: This article has been semi-protected since 2011 due to BLP violations. Davis has been dead for 11 years now, so the reason for the protection no longer applies here. The protecting administrator hasn't been active since at least 2014. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Unprotection: No longer nessecary: This article has been semi-protected since 2011 due to BLP violations. Moore has been dead for four years now, so the reason for the protection no longer applies here. The protecting administrator was last active almost ten months ago. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Unprotection: No longer nessecary: This article has been semi-protected since 2015 due to BLP violations. Thom has been dead for two years now, so the reason for the protection no longer applies here. The protecting administrator hasn't been active since at least 2015. BriDash9000 (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

0 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Updated as needed. Last updated: 10:28, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
10 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox tennis tournament year (request) 2025-06-23 18:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Archives (request) 2025-07-01 00:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:DYK archive header (request) 2025-07-11 23:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Maile66 on 2019-09-05: "Edited without discussion"
Module:Infobox road/browselinks (request) 2025-07-12 06:07 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2022-01-06: "High-risk template or module: 24404 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Automatic taxobox (request) 2025-07-12 20:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:GeoGroup (request) 2025-07-13 06:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by Hut 8.5 on 2016-12-22: "Highly visible template"
Template:ODNBsub (request) 2025-07-13 21:49 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:AfC submission (request) 2025-07-15 04:30 Template-protected (log) From Template:AFC submission: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-17: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox college sports team season (request) 2025-07-15 06:11 Template-protected (log) From Template:Infobox NCAA team season: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:If preview/styles.css (request) 2025-07-15 13:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Izno on 2021-05-05: "match parent"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:02, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 14:16, 11 July 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

@M.Billoo2000: A couple things here: the autopatrolled right does not give you any additional technical abilities, it would only filter your articles out of the new pages feed, so it would not help you with the Destubathon nor with any "attacks by sock puppetry". If you're having trouble with abusive users, please report them at ANI. Also, the autopatrolled right is meant for fairly prolific creators of articles, and looking at the XTools list I see just three creations in the trailing year, and not that many more in the years before that. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Despite what TechnoSquirrel69 said above, I opened the last ten articles that show up in XTools (which lists 32 in total). That brings me back to 2022, which reflects the issue brought up above. The articles written by you are all nice and clean. However, about half of the articles that I looked at were not written by you; all you did is create the initial redirect. Given that, you wouldn't meet the minimum requirement of 25 articles created. Together with the low frequency of article creation, that negates the need to be autopatrolled.  Not done Schwede66 07:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Resubmitting #User:Human Right Wiki above as a procedural action, not an endorsement on the merits. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

The first request was archived; this was the nomination statement:

Dear admins, please grant the WP:APAT to User:BlaUser234. Otherwise, we see many cockroaches in WP:NPP every day:) Thank you.
— HumanRight 14:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 08:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
I am going to make a new account. I am still logged in, but I did not provide an email address when making my account and I forgot my password. If I get logged out somehow I will not be able to get back in, so I might as well bite the bullet now and make a new account.. BlaUser234 (talk) 06:42, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
You can update your email address at any time, @BlaUser234. Sarsenethe/they•(talk) 08:58, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
This editor is now using a new account, B33tleMania12, so I've boldly updated the nomination links. Here's the old XTools article list. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:42, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has created roughly 8 articles. MusikBot talk 17:50, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done All of their article creations are easy reviews and don't meaningfully increase the work of NPP reviewers. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:37, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello there, my respect to you! I would like to request for getting autopatrolled rights because I contribute interesting articles to both English and Simple Wikipedia. I have over 700 edits, which is over the requirements, and my account is over 3 months old. If I get autopatrolled rights, I will never forget this appreciation I got and I will continue contributing to Wikipedia, and I will also continue to take responsibilities for my actions. Thanks! Waiting for a feedback. :-) Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 13:10, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Draft:Keishampat was declined recently. Your most recent article, Tiddim Road, has peacock prose in the second sentence: "This an important transportation road during World War II, during the Battle of Imphal (1944), holding and remaining as an essential transportation road today." voorts (talk/contributions) 00:55, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages.

Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.)

I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm not inclined to grant autopatrolled so soon after the SCOTUS redirect deletions, but won't object if another admin wants to grant it. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:51, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your honest feedback, voorts. Although I hope that an admin decides to grant it, I have been on Wikipedia for a long time and I will continue to for a long time to come no matter what. Please let me know if you ever need help with anything, whether it's a full-scale project or a simple clean-up. PickleG13 (talk) 21:47, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Fairly prolific article creator and translator who has written on a number of topics. I had nearly no complaints reviewing their creations for notability and text-source integrity, and they were all generally well-written and -formatted. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 09:45, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 23:30, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

This user has contributed a number of articles that are of quite good initial quality. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 23:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 00:49, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to request Autopatrolled rights for my account. I've made 74 articles, mostly BLPs. None of my articles have been deleted, and all are above stub-class. I have also recently had two DYK hooks approved and I make sure to create talk pages for my articles. I hope to cut down on the NPP backlog as I continue to create. 24Anonymous (talk) 03:20, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Which three sources cited in the article establish that Grace Gordon (soccer) is notable? voorts (talk/contributions) 23:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
The Mainline Times & Suburban article, the PA Prep Live article (which differs from the previous one with a new interview) and the O'Colly article. While I recognized that the O'Colly's independence might be questionable due to its connection with Oklahoma State University, I betted on the multiple articles (2, 3) written by the website to prove WP:GNG. I also do feel comfortable utilizing Articles for creation when I feel that notability might be a bit less concrete, as I have for Taylor Hansen and, more recently, Darielle O'Brien. 24Anonymous (talk) 23:51, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Regular article creator and Did you know? contributor who demonstrates understanding of the notability guidelines on a number of topics. No copyright violation troubles, and spot-checks for text–source integrity do indeed check out. Note their creation Not-deer was deleted at AfD earlier this year; I'm not inclined to give this too much weight here as it seems to have been a notability edge case, and experienced participants in that discussion gave reasonable arguments both for and against deletion. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


I like regular expressions and fixing typos. LordDiscord (talk) 02:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Would like to fix typos do maintenance & other stuff using JWB. Thanks! Ophyrius (he/him
T • C • G
) 08:54, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

for a newly created article, i want to be able to quickly replace mentions of the subject in other articles with wikilinks Kinerd518 (talk) 17:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

The number of protests and the count are incorrect. I keep a weekly list of protest and counts. Myself and volunteers collected counts from 2133 sites, which is about 92% of sites that day. They are cited. Many are from organizer. It can be seen https://www.wethepeopledissent.net. The count we arrived at was 4.1 to 5.2 million. at about 2300 sites.

In addition, I would like to add the number of protests and counts for each state. There's a file with the number of protests and the state count about halfway down the page. https://www.wethepeopledissent.net

If you'd like to see the work I do to verify my knowledge, I report on protests on Substack weekly: https://thepeopledissent.substack.com

I would be happy to add them if you'd like to grant editor status. We the People Dissent (talk) 03:04, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Please read the policies on reliable sources and original research. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:13, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights:

I am requesting extended confirmed rights as I have made over 700 constructive edits across the English Wikipedia, and my account is over 30 days old. I have created multiple new articles, participated in improving existing pages, and made meaningful contributions to content related to Hinduism and Nepalese culture. I would like to be able to move articles from draft space to mainspace and edit semi-protected pages for ongoing work. Thank you for considering my request.

Related tools and contributions: rfar · spi · cci Cognifex (talkcontribs) 07:04, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response) by Cognifex. MusikBot talk 11:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:11, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Your only edits in 6 months have been to request five different permissions. None of the requests have a reason. It's not clear you have a need for any of them, let alone meet the requirements for them. stwalkerster (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

Requests for file mover

File mover

Hello! I have over 2,800+ edits and have over 4 months of experience. I would like to have file mover rights so I can rename not great-named files. I read the naming policies and I know how when and when not to rename files. File mover rights would help me improve Wikipedia unlike I could before. Floating Orb Let's talk! 01:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done 0 edits to file namespace. Please prove your knowledge by using {{rename media}} to request other file movers rename files, rather than expecting us to blindly trust you. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Okay. Floating Orb Let's talk! 19:18, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery, how many do you want to make? Floating Orb Let's talk! 19:59, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
I just made a few. Floating Orb Let's talk! 20:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
There's no fixed number, but since all of the requests you did were for Commons files rather than local files that actually weighs even further against granting ... * Pppery * it has begun... 20:36, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Oh. (@Pppery) Floating Orb Let's talk! 22:42, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
I tried one now. Floating Orb Let's talk! 22:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery. Floating Orb Let's talk! 02:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Choosing a file that was already tagged for speedy deletion as having been moved to Commons was a strange choice.
Please stop pinging me. At this point you've proven your lack of familiarity with the process and nothing you can possibly do in the near future will convince me to grant this. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:06, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Okay. Floating Orb Let's talk! 03:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag.

Mass message sender

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 127 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 09:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. Your only edits in 6 months have been to request five different permissions. None of the requests have a reason. It's not clear you have a need for any of them, let alone meet the requirements for them. stwalkerster (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

I had not realised there was such a big backlog at NPP and would like to help reduce it; I am an experienced editor and article creator myself, and would be very happy to do more to help new editors learn about Wikipedia. Tony Holkham (Talk) 12:44, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

thanks for volunteering,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 13:48, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to help with the backlog and be able to streamline my reviewing with the curation toolbar. Zanahary 15:48, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Hello, I've been active in tackling relists and closures on XfD logs, and am requesting the page mover right to be able to cleanly move pages to userspace or draftspace when there is consensus to do so; I sometimes encounter discussions like that during my log runs. Granting the page mover right would lighten the workload for admins having to do additional housekeeping (i.e. deleting redirects) or more closures. Thanks for considering this request. Left guide (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

The current AfDs for Luke McCormick and Harbor Miller I see as having consensus to draftify, and the QClimate chart TfD is one I recently closed as a move to userspace. Perhaps that might help gauge my judgment in using the page mover tool. Left guide (talk) 01:02, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting page mover rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:15, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 155 total edits. MusikBot talk 09:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. Your only edits in 6 months have been to request five different permissions. None of the requests have a reason. It's not clear you have a need for any of them, let alone meet the requirements for them. stwalkerster (talk) 12:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
I am active with cleaning up disambiguation pages, which are often malplaced. Almost all of my RMTR requests end up smoothly going through, and I have had several RMs that I knew had consensus and would have closed, if I could. I believe I have demonstrated good judgement in RM discussions, and will use the permissions to improve the encyclopedia. Thanks. Ivey (talk - contribs) 16:44, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:14, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Your only edits in 6 months have been to request five different permissions. None of the requests have a reason. It's not clear you have a need for any of them, let alone meet the requirements for them. stwalkerster (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

I’d like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I’ve been active for over a month now and have made 700+ edits, mostly focused on improving article tone, adding reliable sources, fixing formatting issues, and cleaning up drafts. I’ve created and improved a number of articles, particularly in biographical and cultural topics. I’m familiar with key policies like WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:COPYVIO, and I aim to contribute more to content maintenance through reviewing edits on protected pages. I’m careful with sourcing and would use reviewer tools with that same level of care. Cognifex (talkcontribs) 11:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. MusikBot talk 11:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Hi, I am a CVU on the German Wikipedia and I am becoming more involved into fighting X-Wiki vandalism. On dewp I am Sichter (Rollback&Review) and temporary-account-viewer. Since my intentions are to fight global vandalism, I will not use the user right locally until I have studied Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback. NDG (talk) 07:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 101 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 08:20, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
non-admin comment @NDG You don't seem to be very active here and don't meet the criteria. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, I'm sorry that you don't see my contribution as a sufficient enrichment for the project, but I still wish you all the best. NDG (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
@Cactusisme could you tell me what happened here de:Spezial:Diff/247660539 and here de:Spezial:Diff/255973678? NDG (talk) 11:08, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
@NDG Please discuss it on the correct wiki, thanks. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:11, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Consent! But please let an administrator decide. I explained how I restrict myself at the beginning and what my intention is despite the requirements for this application. NDG (talk) 11:15, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done for now. We would generally like to see at least a few hundred mainspace edits, or enough to show a solid track record of good counter-vandalism (on enwiki). Having rollback on another wiki is neat, but it doesn't affect our standards. Feel free to reapply when you meet the criteria at the top of the page. Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 11:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, good day! I created an account on the English Wikipedia 21 days ago and I am an active contributor! Can you give me "Rollbackers" status? Thanks! (I love yourwiki (talk) 03:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC))
@I love yourwiki Hi and welcome to Wikipedias, please create a new section if would like to request any right by clicking the add request button above and filling in the relevant details. Please read WP:Rollback first as well as it's granting criteria. (non-admin comment) Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 11:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
@Giraffer check on this History[3]. I respect your standards. Do you see any issues or signs of lack of experience? NDG (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
As I now fulfil the minimum requirements, please consider my experience in other projects. Thank you very much NDG (talk) 11:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I would like rollback rights please so that I could use Huggle to fight vandalism on recent changes. I've made 2200 edits and have patrolled recent changes for a few months now. Thank you for considering my request. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 23:33, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

I am requesting rollback in order to better fight vandalism. This is my second request attempt, with my first being over a year ago; it was rejected because my work patrolling recent changes was deemed too sporadic. Despite my patrolling of recent changes admittedly still being somewhat sporadic, I have come across two separate instances when having rollback rights would have allowed me to better contribute to the project (here and here). I consistently make sure to notify editors when reverting their edits, and I feel that I have a good track record when it comes to identifying vandalism in order to use rollback rights responsibly. Thanks. Leafy46 (talk) 05:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason for requesting rollback rights Littlestepsforward (talk) 09:13, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 127 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 09:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. Your only edits in 6 months have been to request five different permissions. None of the requests have a reason. It's not clear you have a need for any of them, let alone meet the requirements for them. stwalkerster (talk) 12:25, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

Increasing number of edits into the template space after being an article contributor for years. Running across more protected templates, such as Infobox gymnast, for which I'd need access. Already have much experience editing and creating templates, as well as sandbox to production edits. GauchoDude (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 19)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~22k)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~630)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: ~1)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: ~2)
Primefac (talk) 21:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
Not sure if I'm supposed to reply to this or not? Clearly well surpass the vast majority of guidelines and a few short on some. Please advise if you have any further questions for me? GauchoDude (talk) 22:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
You can if you want. It's easy to run the numbers, just didn't have the bandwidth to do a full review. Primefac (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
Few questions for you:
  • Do you intend to edit LUA modules?
  • Do you intend to contribute to the other associated areas (contentmodels, edit notices, etc. Basically anything other then templates build on wikitext)?
  • Please review Wikipedia:High-risk templates, let us know if you have any questions about it.
  • Do you understand that in general, most changes to highly used templates should be proposed and tested first - as opposed to the standard WP:BRD process? (note: it is generally acceptable to promote tests to the primary page after a reasonable time so long as there is no objection).
xaosflux Talk 13:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)