Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- HiiiIwishamancame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:4040:b248:9d00:945b:8191:6277:7111 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1174 twice in the last 5 minutes (LTA 1174, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:33, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Advay matoor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Trump administration family separation policy (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Wp:NOTHERE. Not sure if the edit needs rev/del. I don't want to add a link to it here. Knitsey (talk) 01:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2607:FEA8:5A2:6100:8886:ECD1:F3D5:DCAE (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Tampa Bay Lightning (diff): vandalism after final warning. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- 103.219.120.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism only account, waits some time between instances of vandalism to reset the count. Endersslay (talk) 02:25, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- LilSexyCreamPieGirl (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Disruptive username. sexual name with term "cream pie" localBluepikmin (whistle the pikmin) 15:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- Harewalidevelopmentgroup (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Promotes "Harewali development group". Cooldudeseven7 join in on the tea talk 12:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Trollboy808 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Trollboy for a username can imply that they can disrupt Wikipedia. Felicia (talk) 23:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Sh1thead696969 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. Matt Deres (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: User:Yukitanooki is repeatedly adding non-free screenshot to the article. 0x0a (talk) 07:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel claims 85% of Qunietra. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This doesn't receive a huge amount of traffic or vandalism but it is highly relevant to the WP:ARBPIA CTOP and should probably be protected. Thanks in advance!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Hi, I am Sandra Bongjoh. I have a page on wikipedia that is already visible on google and in addition to it my page on wikipedia will have more sources to prove me as a famous person but the sources will not appear right now. I would like to know if you can put a lock to prevent vandalism on this page, and I will be the only person editing the page. (Redacted) Bye, I am looking forward to hearing from you soon, Stay safe and healthy, Sandra
50.222.21.178 (talk) 15:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- No such page exists. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not free webhosting; pages are not "owned" the the subjects. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Releasing tomorrow, the film's lead actor has a strong fan base who are vandalising this article. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP keep editing UK, Éire, DACH and Italia's launch date to mid 2025 without source John123521t c 16:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Skitash (talk) 16:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Like in many biographies of famous footballers, masses of IPs inserting "he is the greatest" or similar- FMSky (talk) 17:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to frequent vandalism / edit warring. MSD50 (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sush150 (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suspected LTA or socking as of late. JayCubby 18:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Plenty of tests/vandalism in the last month or so, though a few of the recent IP edits look to be good faith. Perhaps a case for PC? Entranced98 (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I am also ok with PC as well Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit-warring, improperly ref changes and substandard formatting e.g. addition links to example.com. Dl2000 (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. M.C. (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: For a few weeks, general IP harassment. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:28, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Tell me if I'm missing something but I'm not seeing the harassment...? There was one nonconstructive edit this morning [1] and a mildly provocative warning from an IP a few hours ago [2] but I'm not seeing anything that warrants protection, especially when you have had multiple good-faith interactions with IPs on your talk page recently. Giraffer (talk) 22:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request temporary protection due to multiple disruptive edits/rollback by IP user 95.24.57.XX, user was warned to use the talk pages to gain support for his edits but didn't reply or stop the reinstating the edits Alawadhi3000 (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Aintabli (talk) 21:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding false information. GSK (talk • edits) 21:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and accounts adding false information. I suspect some WP:LTA is going on, but currently have no concrete proof. GSK (talk • edits) 22:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by IPs. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 22:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs adding large chunks of unsourced and AI content. ProtobowlAddict talk! 22:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Fairly transparent abuse of multiple accounts and IP addresses going on this BLP. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – High IP vandalism since February; a few months of protection would be great. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 22:47, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Problematic edits from 5 different IPs in this week. –RoxySaunders 🏳️⚧️ (talk • stalk) 23:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and unncessary changes from 5 random 2600 IP's, like crosby, he is a generational talent and should be given special treatment Gymrat16 (talk) 23:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Article repeatedly vandalized by IP editors. The leading sentence probably needs a bit of toning down, but before that happens, something should be done. APenguinThatIsSilly("talk") 23:39, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated unconstructive addition of cast members since prior protection lapsed. (This is some of the worst repeated vandalism I have seen on recent Marvel articles in such a short timeframe.). Trailblazer101 (talk) 23:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Much of the article is ARBPIA related and thus liable to bias and disruption. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There has been repeated removal of stable, well-sourced content by an IP editor and a cluster of newly registered accounts, all with a single-purpose focus. The accounts seem to make minor edits to obscure their intent, while the IP handles the actual deletion of content. This appears coordinated. Warnings have been issued, and discussion has been attempted on the talk page without engagement. J Pratas (talk) 02:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 02:07, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editors and multiple ip's vandalising the article. Knitsey (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: Redirect was protected years ago. It now leads to a broken anchor. RanDom 404 (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Bearcat: as protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- I think the section should be restored, which would fix the problem of the broken anchor. The section was deleted by a sock, then never restored before the article was protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: No longer needs protection. @HangingCurve:. RanDom 404 (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- HangingCurve is no longer an admim. @RanDom 404: Why do you think the article doesn't need protection anymore? Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- It isn't an article, it's a redirect. A case could be made for turning it into a disambiguation page because there are two articles beginning with "Camp Rock 2". ~Anachronist (talk) 02:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: No edits since 2018 so protection could be lowered at least. Could use a retarget to List of films about the Titanic, the primary subject. RanDom 404 (talk) 13:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- @RanDom 404: I suppose you mean Titanic (film), which has no edits since 2018 since it is fully protected. Also, it is already a redirect to Titanic (disambiguation)#Films. Why would we need to unprotect the redirect? Lectonar (talk) 13:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not unprotected. No valid reason given. If there's a WP:RM discussion that was recently closed about it, reply and we can reconsider. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done because there's nothing to do. It's already been at ECP for months. It just never displayed the protection icon. I just fixed that. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:44, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Unprotection: The subject of the article died last year, and this article no longer needs semi-protection because BLP no longer applies. The subject's article is not controversial, and has not had editing conflicts. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:TRYUNPROT. The article has been indefinitely semi-protected since 2020 after a history of disruption. As the article has been protected for several years now it might be worth testing to see if protection is still warranted or not, without prejudice against a return to protection should disruption resume. Already asked the protecting admin JzG about it and he was unsure if protection should not be removed or if it should, so consider this also a request for a second opinion. If there are any lingering concerns about disruption, rather than full unprotection the protection could instead be lowered to pending changes to see if that could address any possible disruption. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 15 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:23, 10 April 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Dracophyllum is a user that has been creating lists and articles largely related to the flora of New Zealand and the surrounding landmasses. Several of these have been brought to GA level and at least one to FA (Dracophyllum fiordense) from scratch. They have been around for a little while; their works are well-developed in sandboxes prior to publishing in mainspace, and need little attention once published. Reconrabbit 01:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I want to be active on English Wikipedia more. I am a trusted global user. So I want the flag of this user group. Janabaevazizbek (talk) 11:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Requesting access mostly to perform reference/grammar edits. Brent Silby (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
ConfirmedGulu Monteiro EDP
Reason for requesting goes here I am an experienced theater director creating a Wikipedia article about my work that has been reviewed multiple times by AfC reviewers. I need to upload several low-resolution scans of historical press articles under fair use to support the notability of the subject. My account is more than 4 days old and has over 10 edits. Please consider granting confirmed user status so I can upload files to the English Wikipedia. Thank you! Gulu Monteiro EDP (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
I often use the translation tool to translate English articles into Dutch. However, recently I've been receiving the following message: "On the English Wikipedia this tool is limited to extended confirmed editors, and the machine translation component is disabled for all users (see WP:CXT)." While I can still continue with the translation after clicking through, I didn't used to see this message. I'm now worried that something has changed and I may soon lose access to the tool entirely. For this reason, I would like to kindly request extended confirmed status. I'm mostly active on the Dutch Wikipedia, not so much here. Thank you very much in advance! AidepikiWeerF (talk) 14:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the New Page Reviewer user right. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since May 2022 and have made a variety of edits, including content creation, copyediting, and reverting vandalism. I have also patrolled recent changes and worked on improving articles related to history, Type 1 diabetes, and various general topics. Additionally, I understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, reliable sourcing requirements, and article layout conventions. I am familiar with the CSD and AfC, as well as most other things. Thank you for considering my request. MallardTV Talk to me! 03:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’d like to request NPR right for a 45 day trial. I’m familiar with key policy WP:N, WP:V, WP:NPOV, and deletion criteria, CSD, PROD, & AfD. I want to test myself with this role and help reduce the backlog by reviewing new pages carefully and in line with Wiki guidelines. Oxiyam.Primal (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have 1 denied applied about a month ago because I didn't have 500 undeleted Main space edits at the time. I now have 501 so I am reapplying for temporary permissions. I have a decent amount of experience going through AfDs and source searching to check if they are notability. Moritoriko (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I am applying for the new page reviewer role because I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.Jeremiah Msaziri (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
I wish to assist at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I also close WP:RM discussions from time to time and this tool will save me from having to do a technical request every time. I meet the WP:PMCRITERIA. GMH Melbourne (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Occasionally move pages and sometimess if a title is not needed I don't need to mark it with db-g7. Would be much easier to move pages without leaving a redirect behind if needed. RanDom 404 (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I have read the WP:PCCRITERIA and I believe that I meet them. I sometimes see pending edits waiting for approval on articles, and I believe that I could do this job myself. wojtekpolska1013 [talk page] 09:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting PCR to help out with reviewing pending changes I notice when patrolling recent changes. I have read and am familiar with the policies. I'd like to think I would make a good reviewer. LightlySeared (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I have taken up patrolling recent changes and clear vandalism prevension / sourceless BLP-edits in en-wiki too. I have enough experience of the tool through fi-wiki, where I am a rollbacker, pending changes reviewer and ”page stabilzer” (I think the group closest to it here was called editor?). I know I have under 200 edits too now, but my interest at the time here is vandalism prevention which is hard and takes multiple edits (causes spam in recent changes) without rollback-tool. I would ask for sysops to look at my well trusted global status and experience. Thank you! Osmo Lundell (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting rollback rights to help combat vandalism and disruptive edits more effectively. I have been patrolling recent changes for the past 30 days, focusing on identifying and reverting vandalism, test edits, and other unconstructive changes. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies, including WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, and WP:NPOV. I really wanted to improve Wikipedia by my small contribution. I understand the importance of using rollback responsibly. This permission would allow me to respond more efficiently to inappropriate edits. I want to also say that I made some silly mistakes in the starting of my patrolling. However, I learnt from them and make sure that they won't happen again. Such as reverting edits that are already reverted, that mistakes you can see on my past contributions. Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if any additional information is needed. ⚡ VortexPhantom • Talk 07:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
I would like to use rollback perms to more effectively fight vandals on Wikipedia, I am hoping to use Huggle to do this. 𝕟𝕪𝕖𝕦𝕓𝕚𝕞 (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request rollback rights to help fight vandalism more effectively. I've been actively reverting clear cases of vandalism using Twinkle. I have over 2000 edits and am familiar with relevant policies. Calmkelp talk 05:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to try some other counter-vandalism tools, such as AntiVandal, Huggle, and SWViewer, which require the rollback right to use. I've actively been patrolling recent changes for roughly 3-4 months and have consistently warned editors when reverting them. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Greetings, I’m an extended confirmed user, I am requesting for the rollback rights to help fight against vandalism and disruptive edits. I’m more active on recent changes feed and also new page feeds, I am familiar with WP:VANDALISM and I will love to help here. Best Regards (CP) 22:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing constructively on the project for a few years now and would like to more effectively revert disruptive edits when I encounter them. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and understand the distinction between purely disruptive edits and edits that may be unhelpful but are made in good-faith. When reverting a new user's edits, I make sure to properly explain myself in an edit summary and leave a message on the relevant article's or user's talk page as appropriate, unless the user is obviously acting in bad faith and WP:DENY applies, in which case I report them to a relevant noticeboard. I have thoroughly read the WP:ROLLBACK instructions and will make sure to familiarize myself with the tools before using them, and avoid using the rollback tools when they are not appropriate and another reversion tool would be more suitable. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
I am a decently experienced user who primarily works on sports-related articles. In this time, I've come across Template talk:College athlete recruit end which requires edits, but appears to have been abandoned, as my message from last year was never addressed. I have made edits within the sandbox, but don't expect them to be responded to. poketape (talk) 06:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |