Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

(add request · view requests)

User:Spotemgottem

• Spotemgottem (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hello,

While patrolling the recent changes, I often run into pending changes. I think I am a good candidate for this permission because I already revert vandalism prolifically. I have read WP:RPC and whenever I revert something that's not blatant vandalism/a BLP violation, I always include an adequate edit summary, so I would also be able to tell which pending changes are low-quality good-faith edits and let them through (with amendments after, possibly). I also never engage in edit wars or abuse my rollback function. Spotemgottem (talk) 08:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Mz7 (talk) 00:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

User:Floating Orb

• Floating Orb (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I found a reviewable edit that was not good and had already been reverted the first time it was placed. I reverted the new version of it, since the edit was not following the Wikipedia guidelines. I think that I should have Reviewing pending changes rights, since I have experience with reverting vandalism and disruptive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floating Orb (talk • contribs) 19:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: I added the signature and formatted the request correctly after it was placed (diff). —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 19:47, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 19:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)