Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please read the guidelines for granting this right before making a request.

User:Endrabcwizart

Hi, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights. I have some experience as an Articles for Creation (AfC) reviewer and have gained a good understanding of Wikipedia’s notability, sourcing, and content policies. I’m interested in helping reduce the backlog by reviewing new pages, and I’m familiar with guidelines such as WP:NPP, WP:CSD, WP:N, and WP:BLP. I aim to contribute constructively on Wikipedia. Thank you Endrabcwizart (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and your interest in this permission. In reviewing your track record thus far, however, I'm a bit concerned by both a very low AfD match rate, and the final exchange between you and Alalch E. in this AfD. A lot of the material in question is old enough that this isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but the recent comment at AfD (even if it is about an article you created much earlier), coupled with the lack of more recent evidence of a strong record in AfD and/or article creation, I ultimately have to mark this as  Not done. Please consider reapplying once you've built up a more recent track record of constructive AfD participation (or other edits that demonstrate a clear understanding of the relevant guidelines and policies). signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Như Gây Mê

Recently beside to anti-vandalism, I have also been interested in resolving the page backlog. Looking at the huge backlog of new pages, I'd greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute and help alleviate the backlog. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 15:27, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bunnypranav

I would like to request permanent NPR rights. My trial is due on 31st May and started back in late December 2024. I would love to continue contributing in this space and help reduce the ever-growing backlog. I believe my quality of reviewing has improved since the last trial. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 15:52, 31 May 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 11:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thesazh

I have independently created 14 new articles and contributed to the improvement of several others by polishing clarity, tone, and adherence to Wikipedia's core content policies. I am familiar with the principles of notability, verifiability, reliable sourcing, and neutral point of view, and I strive to uphold these standards in all my contributions. I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights to assist in maintaining the quality of newly created content and to contribute more effectively to the Wikipedia. Thesazh (talk) 08:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has 322 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 08:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Fails minimum criteria. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:42, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Afstromen

Hi, I’d like to request New Page Patroller rights. I’ve created 24 articles, all of which meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, and I have a solid understanding of notability across a range of topics. I was recently granted AfC reviewer rights and have begun actively reviewing drafts. While my reviews aren’t high in quantity yet, I believe they reflect careful, quality work aligned with Wikipedia policies. I also participate in AfD discussions and have experience in both deletions and retentions based on consensus and policy. Additionally, I’ve improved a number of unsourced articles by adding reliable citations. I’d like to disclose that, if granted NPP rights, I will primarily focus on India-related topics, as I have strong familiarity with reliable Indian sources and local context. I believe it’s best to patrol within areas where I can apply sound judgment and avoid risky decisions. I’m open to feedback or a trial period. Thank you. Afstromen (talk) 12:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating Spinny (company) despite Spinny being salted seems like something that should be a total deal-breaker here. But I don't normally get involved in this area so will let another admin make a final decision. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:41, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery, I’ve posted a note on the talk page of Spinny (company) to clarify my intention. I genuinely believe the subject is notable, based on significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.
To be honest, I wasn’t aware that when a title is protected, there are specific procedures to follow before recreating the article. As soon as I realized the situation, I added a note on the talk page to be transparent and open to community input.
I’d appreciate any guidance on what the appropriate process is in such cases especially when a title has been salted. My goal is to contribute constructively and in line with Wikipedia’s policies
Afstromen (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly, this isn't convincing. The mindset that one sees that one is prohibited from doing something, and then tries to do it anyway through the back door is not the mindset we want to have in new page reviewers. It gives the appearance of being holier-than-thou. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I shared my intentions honestly, and I truly didn’t realize that what I did was against the guidelines. If this has caused any concern about trust, I understand, but I want to make it clear that it wasn’t intentional. I know how important it is that all contributions follow policy and are made in good faith. I respect your decision and will be more careful in the future.
Afstromen (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the future, the WP:SALTing needs to be removed (via asking the protecting admin on their user talk, or via WP:RFUP) rather than putting an article at a non-ideal title. The title is non ideal because "(company)" is an unnecessary disambiguator in this case. Disambiguators should only be used if there are multiple articles with the same name. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I’ll make sure to be more careful about this in the future. Thank you for pointing it out.
Afstromen (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Moritoriko

Hello, I am requesting rights be extended after a one month trial so that I can participate in the June backlog event that showed up on my watchlist page :) Moritoriko (talk) 04:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 05:00, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:CherryPie94

I would like to continue reviewing new pages and also accept/deny AFC pages. I've created 90+ pages and am familiar with content policies. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 14:15, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:MWFwiki

Hello,
Requesting New Page Patroller permissions. I have over a decade of activity on Wikipedia, with 4,400+ live edits (99.4% of my edits are "live"). I have created three (proper) articles. I became more active in the last 1-2 years. I believe I meet and exceed the minimum criteria.

That said, my weakest areas would probably be CSD and PROD. However, I am familiar with both, I've just had my hands full with AfC reviews and AfD contributions. I otherwise have relatively extensive discussion experience with no disciplinary action taken against me. Thank you for your time and consideration. MWFwiki (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vrxces

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - seeking a third renewal of the expired patrolled status. I understand my patrol activity has been light so no issues with it being time limited. I have much more experience in AFC and AFD, which is hopefully some reassurance that I'm familiar with policy by this point. Let me know if you need any more details! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 1 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rahmatula786

I am requesting for New Page Reviewer right which is about to expire in few days. I have reviewed new pages and have been working for few months as AFC reviewer. Have been contributing regularly in AFD discussion. I am also participating in upcoming JUNE AFC Backlog Drive . Would appreciate the opportunity to contribute here. Thank You. Rahmatula786 (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 11:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer&oldid=1292710214"