User talk:BusterD

	Archives
	22 Jul 05 – 26 Sep 06 ; 09 Oct 06 – 05 Dec 06 ; 14 Dec 06 – 07 Nov 07 ; 01 Dec 07 – 12 Feb 08; 15 Feb 08 – 08 May 08 ; 19 May 08 – 13 Nov 08; 26 Nov 08 – 07 Sep 09 ; 08 Sep 09 – 29 Oct 10 ; 29 Oct 10 – 26 Sep 11 ; 04 Oct 11 – 30 Sep 12 ; 01 Oct 12 – 13 Oct 13 ; 26 Oct 13 – 27 Aug 14 ; 09 Sep 14 – 24 Dec 15 ; 25 Dec 15 – 08 Apr 18 ; 21 Apr 18 – 30 Jun 19 ; 07 Jul 19 – 26 Apr 21; 03 May 21 – 05 Apr 22; 07 Apr 22 – 26 Dec 22; 01 Jan 23 – 01 Jan 24; 01 Jan 24 – 31 Dec 24; 01 Jan 25 - 26 Jun 25; 06 Jul 25 - 31 Dec 25;

BusterD is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

With thanks to User:RexxS: Wikipedia:Colons and asterisks. Please read and edit accordingly.

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

No RfXs since 17:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC).—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}

AfC submissions

Random submission

~2 weeks

599 pending submissions

(refresh)

.

Mistaken talk page deletion

Hi BusterD, I think you mistakenly deleted User talk:Onyemauche46 when you got the associated userpage. Thanks, Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 12:14, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Quite right; I've corrected myself. Thanks for the sharp eyes! BusterD (talk) 13:41, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An issue over a draft that I recently requested to be deleted.

Hey, @BusterD. I hope that you saw what Ivanvector said on his talk page. It appears that both you and I slipped up with Draft: The Great Meme Reset of 2026 by deleting it for vandalism. I wanted to let you know in case you didn't see the reply, he's not too pleased about this. I'm still not sure if this subject matter is fit for inclusion on Wikipedia, but regardless, you should probably know about this. Thanks. _{S.G. (They/Them) (Talk) (Edits)} 20:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please restore Draft:Radford Sechrist?

I would like to keep working on it, as I had worked on it prior to the deletion, and had been hoping to move it through the process to hopefully become a page in the mainspace. Also, to be clear, I have no connection to that now-banned user. I just don't want my contributions to the page to be eliminated, as I'd have to start from scratch, which would be a challenge, and it would be better to start with something I can improve. Thanks and I hope to hear from you.--Historyday01 (talk) 22:39, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sometimes it's difficult to sort wheat from chaff. BusterD (talk) 22:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope that the page can get accepted. Historyday01 (talk) 00:51, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Meme Reset of 2026 situation

The Great Meme Reset of 2026 got tagged for A7 once more, this is turning into a bit of a farce, with this cycle of marking for deletion and then the page gets restored. I thought you'd like to know about this. Also I recommend that you try to find a way to handle this quickly before it gets deleted for the THIRD time. @Ivanvector is likely going to be pissed at this, and I'd rather we'd avoid pissing off anyone over this, even if it is valid and instead try to discuss this properly in an AfD. I look forward to how you handle this, because my God, I am frankly sick of this debacle, and it seems to just be wasting everyone's time over and over again. Thanks in advance! _{S.G. (They/Them) (Talk) (Edits)} 16:39, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay the notice was removed, but if it gets tagged again, I'm just going to nominate it for an AfD instead. Also hopefully that won't happen because I think you're just as annoyed as I am over this nonsense. This could very well be a great case of judging a book by its cover. I still recommend that you keep that page on your watchlist for the time being. Thanks in advance once again! _{S.G. (They/Them) (Talk) (Edits)} 16:41, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]