User talk:ProClasher97

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daily Dose of Internet (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daily Dose of Internet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daily Dose of Internet, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

when this decline box or when will i will be unbolcked and how many edits should we do in one day. AnimeshHimself (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Biography´s Gabriela

How come you deleted it, if it was taken from gabriela's lectures, videos and so on, plus I have her interview with the biography she did (I interviewed her for that reason) you should have improved it. anyway, I will do another biography of her separately, thanks. by the way she is not even from Puerto Cortes, learn how to investigate. Illy589 (talk) 22:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You just delete in a dumb way, I wonder if you are really a wikipedia writer or an as..le@ProClasher97 Illy589 (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Illy589: Your edits were reverted because they were not written from a neutral point of view, which is a requirement for adding content here on Wikipedia. Also, I highly recommend you read the policy on being civil, as well as this article, as repeatedly being uncivil will likely result in you being blocked. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 03:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do it, I can also report you as false information, I won't let you denigrate a woman either, let alone a wikipedia editor. Illy589 (talk) 06:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Illy589: I’m not really sure what you are talking about to be honest. I just wanted you to be aware of our policy about maintaining a neutral point of view, as that was the reason your edits were reverted. If you need further assistance with that or with other aspects of Wikipedia, you can always visit the Teahouse and ask questions there as well. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 07:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the talk page message. I appreciate it. Knitsey (talk) 13:45, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome! To be honest, I’m not really sure what their messages were about, but I happened to see it and noticed they were block evading so I figured I’d revert it. I do apologize if your notifications got spammed from it though. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 14:38, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They're a sock and they were not impressed with me reporting them. They then created the account you reverted to mess around. I'm fine with you reverting. Knitsey (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, that makes more sense. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 14:52, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roll back on Braces page

Hi,

I recently made an edit to the braces Wikipedia page adding a additional type of braces that don't fall under any of the other categories.

I linked to a dentist focused website, and a article on said site where a orthodontist was interviewed.

While it doesn't fall under reliable source criteria it does fall under;

"Links to be considered

4. Sites that fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources." Wiki, External Links

It's my opinion that a orthodontist is a knowledgeable source on braces.

Thanks! DDSVictorHale (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:NorthDevonDesign/sandbox

Hello ProClasher97. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:NorthDevonDesign/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Drafting articles is a valid use os uiser space. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:50, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: I understand, thank you for letting me know. I do apologize if I caused any inconveniences by tagging that. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 19:07, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]