Template:Admin dashboard/light
- Frequently, some pages transcluding {{Admin dashboard}} are going on overflow and appear at Category:Pages_where_post-expand_include_size_is_exceeded.
This Template:Admin dashboard/light has been rewritten by including directly all the parts that were dispersed in so many sub-templates. - The "leaks out boxes" error has been fixed.
- Pages RFPP and UNFAA are simply linked (i.e. not transcluded) when too busy
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 2603:7000:9307:eb82:4ee:9e8e:b6c8:6dbc (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1361 (LTA 1361, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Warned level 3. PhilKnight (talk) 17:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Timotius Silitonga (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Flavor of the Month (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 18:22, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- MuneeshMalhotra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:05, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- 160.3.11.164 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Bernato6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. IceWelder [✉] 16:48, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Warned level 3. PhilKnight (talk) 17:09, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- 70.29.98.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. Sockpuppet. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaepertank. Painting17 (talk) 19:04, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Katyavarovna (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Leonid Brezhnev: block evasion, see page history. Remsense 🌈 论 19:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- TrustedSourceTeam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent addition of unsourced promotional content to University of Visvesvaraya College of Engineering. Appears to have an undeclared COI, possible SPA. Username also implies multiple people have access to account. Have warned about promotional content, COI, username. User has not responded and has continued editing. SI09 (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Blakesleylan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Worst. Person. Ever.: vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Haj (talk) 19:33, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- 170.245.133.240 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On :Fecto Forgo: vandalism after final warning. Persistent vandalism. Haj (talk) 20:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- 2A02:C7C:6AF9:A500:3850:9FD2:9AAC:FC1E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Monsters University: persistent vandalism. Plasticwonder (talk) 21:04, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- 98.3.86.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Talk:Gulf of Mexico (diff): Disruption only. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 22:13, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- 36.255.80.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Mehmed IV: Clear sock of now-indeffed User:History12345678910. Remsense 🌈 论 22:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 2 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 2 |
| Spam pages | 9 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 3 |
| Other candidates | 25 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 171 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 4 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Omghowmanyusernamerestrictions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Username might also be disruptive per WP:NOTHERE. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Bonervile (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "boner" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Dirty Magazines (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "dirty" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Carlolololo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "l+o+l+o+l" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Username572847482 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Sami official 095 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Dishantlfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Corporate.kuldeep (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- RevernDoshit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheStupidTimesOfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:20, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Xpotstrump (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 19:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Родион Полянский (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ownyourfascism (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "fascis(m|t)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Usernames that promote a controversial or potentially inflammatory point of view may be in violation of the username policy due to creating a hostile editing environment. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Vijaybhaskarup43gonda271602 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- 101st prior service (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- refers to military regiment. Only 1 edit so far. Secretlondon (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Idiotdisease (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Mgomesofc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Roses FC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Comedicusernamehaha (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Тихонова Пустынь (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Gwen Killerby (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:20, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- DACtionnaire des bas prix (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:00, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: prick. Violating string: dactionnaire des bas pricks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:00, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- OstersonderzugDirlewanger (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- FThePatriarchyKeychainOnTheGround (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Cockfightermaster1969 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Gave me a chuckle, though. Gommeh 🎮 16:39, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: I'm unsure here; there are legitimate uses of the word "cock", cockfighting, South Carolina Gamecocks. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- The "1969" part might indicate it is not referring to chickens fighting? Iljhgtn (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- I think this is a good candidate for WP:RFCN The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- The "1969" part might indicate it is not referring to chickens fighting? Iljhgtn (talk) 17:49, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Parrot Vacations (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 18:54, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Fiona Romeo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Possible impersonator of https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:FRomeo_(WMF). TurboSuperA+(connect) 08:54, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Lin-Manuel McButtbacon (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Offensive username with derogatory implication to a BLP (if you're an admin who doesn't have familiarity with the context, please feel free to ask me). Unproductive user with few-to-no unobjectionable edits to date. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 12:25, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- DoGoodWorkMgmt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. The user name s a role account. It represents a company name "Do Good Work Management". A quick search verifies this. Graywalls (talk) 13:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- MissPlanetPageant (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:13, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ed Durr (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Appears to represent Edward Durr. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 19:40, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Southeastbank (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. qcne (talk) 20:49, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Dwelfy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Dwelfy. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: High Level of IP disruptive editing. I am almost certain the edits are being made in good faith. Several IPS are updating stats which is great, but there it is generally agreed on at WP:Cricket to not update stats until a match has ended. I suggest semi-protection for 4 or 5 days as the Test will definitely be done by then. Thank you Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – A victim of violence during the Siege of Al-Qarara / Gaza war, relevant to WP:ARBPIA and should be ECP under those sanctions. Thank you. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:12, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption as soon as previous protection expired. Probable sock. Mellk (talk) 11:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 12:55, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Return of editing behaviours stemming from last page protection (which ended on July 1). livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:23, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Following death of Jota of Liverpool, rumours exist that his number might be retired. Only rumours. Egghead06 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring between confirmed users, already semi-protected, should be full protected for a while. Vestrian24Bio 16:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High Level of IP disruptive editing. I am almost certain the edits are being made in good faith. 2409:40F2:3E:FCAD:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Returned after a year of semi, protection log shows that this is a frequent target for childish vandalism and BLP issues. Entranced98 (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated ban evasion activity immediately after protection was removed. Likely related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Similar to concurrent request for Ted Grant, repeated ban evasion activity likely related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 17:41, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 19:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Falls under WP:CT/ARBPIA restrictions. A lot of activity from IP/non-WP:ECP users. Astaire (talk) 19:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 21:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandals. ZimZalaBim talk 21:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- List of WWE pay-per-view and livestreaming supercards (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Disruptive Editing by ip's. Untamed1910 (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent frequent IP vandalism. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resume of editing stemming from previous protection. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:24, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent content and image removal (either unexplained or defended by something that would go against WP:CENSOR) from IP accounts: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Requesting page protection as a result, thank you. Soulbust (talk) 02:37, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Seems to be one of the articles that should have been tagged with the Contentious topics/talk notice|a-i template and protected years ago. Sean.hoyland (talk) 04:30, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting indefinite semi-protection, absolutely nonstop vandalism going on for years that never seems to go away, despite being temporarily protected seven times, page is long overdue for indefinite pp-semi. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 07:08, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Every single post in the last few days by IPs/new editors is a BLP violation claiming this person is dead- because they all are mixing up with another person of same name. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. The page is within scope of the restrictions. Per the ArbCom remedies, only extended-confirmed editors should be able to edit the article. Sean.hoyland (talk) 08:16, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Misinformation and vandalism 219.89.131.234 (talk) 10:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruption by IP editors regarding a rumored transaction. – sbaio 10:36, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RaschenTechner (talk) 10:47, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism Ydl9903562552 (talk) 11:09, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced material, unable to verify. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 12:16, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Sahaib (talk) 14:29, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 14:36, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection - Slow-motion edit war over adding an (unsourced) claim that subject is best known for being a pacifist; see WP:TH#Last edit on Daniele Ganser's wikipedia, WP:TH#Please add "being a pacifist" to Daniele Gansers wikipedias' page, User talk:155.190.35.4#Help me! for a small sample of the users/IPs pushing this. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:46, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – LTA. (CC) Tbhotch™ 16:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:31, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. ASUKITE 16:18, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of the same sentence, which is validated by the cited source, going all the way back to January of this year. Iiii I I I (talk) 16:34, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent factual errors. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:43, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Academic Challenger (talk) 19:42, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated vandalism of images. 172.243.224.152 (talk) 17:21, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 17:37, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Subject to repeated sockpuppet attacks, related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Subject to repeated sockpuppet attacks, related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: After 10 years of trying to introduce original sourced material rather than computer generated inaccurate designs, I am seeking protection for the image of the original 1806 design of the flag of the Russian-American Comany from repeated vandalism. Ltkizhi (talk) 18:45, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —C.Fred (talk) 18:59, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page subject to sockpuppet attacks, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:30, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Joyous! Noise! 21:53, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Reduce to indefinite semi-protection since no other NFL teams' pages are ECP (been in place for 4 years), feels a bit unfair to new users who actually have good edits to make on the team. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging @El C Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case I don't think this username administrator El C is active anymore it has not responded for 3 days according to request lower protection or unprotection says if who ever is no longer administrator, inactive or doesn't respond it can be appeal unless is active then we have to contact username administrator who protect the page. 47.21.195.98 (talk) 04:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- El C edits somewhat sporadically. Be patient. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:11, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This title (with a lowercase L in place of an I - lnto
) was protected in 2013 for appearing in this xkcd comic, despite having never been created. Per WP:NOPREEMPT, I don't see any reason why this should remain protected 12½ years later. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:4839:F2ED:BF8F:52B8 (talk) 13:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- What would you do with it if it was unprotected? And did you contact the protecting administrator? ~Anachronist (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- A little "light reading" concerning the matter: WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive244#XKCD alert... Personally, I'm too old to read it to the end. There's also Talk:Star Trek Into Darkness/Archive 6#Requested move (again); it's what one would expect from such discussions. Favonian (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page was protected by User:RHaworth, who is no longer an administrator. Now that my draft article, Draft:Flipline Studios, has been merged into Papa Louie, I want to use this title as a redirect to that article. I want the creation protection removed. EJPPhilippines (talk) 08:50, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Please correct the Iranian civilian casualties in paragraph three. First it was changed without reason from 200 to 600. Then someone changed and separated the estimate by Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency (HRANA) estimate to be over 1,100 civilians killed which is conflating all deaths with civilians. No source was added to support this. The sources currently listed next to these sentences actually say 200 but these are out off date. HRANA's latest figure is actually 431 civilians killed. The source is presently used in the infobox for their own estimate of 1,190 total deaths. The Iranian government hasn't released updated figures so that should be removed until they have an estimate. I suggest adding the following sentence:
"According to the anti-government Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency, 1,190 Iranians were killed including at least 431 civilians."
102.17.120.130 (talk) 11:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
The issue is with the following section, and I believe it should be removed from the article:
"The 2023 7th October Attack which targeted Israeli soldiers and civilians, were committed by Hamas and its allies. With a barrage of at least 3,000 rockets launched against Israel and vehicle-transported and powered paraglider and infantry incursions into Israel, it was the deadliest terrorist attack in Israel's history and the third-deadliest terrorist attack in the 21st century.[260]"
My reasoning is that this page is for the War on Terror as a global military campaign against terrorist organizations. To include Hamas on this page seems to be biased, and its inclusion is political. I say this because most countries in the world do not designate Hamas a terrorist organization. Only a minority of countries in the world do. To include the military action that Hamas took and designate it as a terrorist action seems to be out of place in this particular page
NOT AFK (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 July 2025 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Error: Protected edit requests can only be made on the talk page. {{subst:trim|1=
Error: Protected edit requests can only be made on the talk page.
Request to add Sindhi language and ethnicity, and improve balance in opening description
[edit]Hi I would like to request the following edits to the **infobox** and **lead paragraph** of the Sial (tribe) article. These changes are based on multiple reliable historical and government sources that confirm the Sial or Siyal tribe is also present in **Sindh province**, where they are recognized as a **Sindhi-speaking community** alongside their better-known Punjabi presence.
Infobox changes
[edit]1. **Change:**
Languages: Punjabi **To:** Languages: Punjabi, Sindhi
2. **Change:**
Ethnicity: Punjabi **To:** Ethnicity: Punjabi, Sindhi
Lead paragraph change
[edit]3. **Change:**
“The Sial or Siyal (Punjabi and Urdu: سيال) is a Punjabi clan found in the Punjab region of the Indian subcontinent, split between India and Pakistan.”
**To:** “The Sial or Siyal (Punjabi Sindhi and Urdu: سيال) is a Sindhi and Punjabi clan found in both the Punjab and Sindh regions of the Indian subcontinent, split between India and Pakistan.”
Add the following sentence to the end of the lead:
[edit]4. “Sial communities have long been settled in interior Sindh, particularly in districts such as Khairpur, Larkana, and Naushahro Feroze, where they are listed as Sindhi-speaking Sammat tribes in historical and modern records.”
Sources to support these changes:
[edit]- Hughes, A. W. (1876). A Gazetteer of the Province of Sind. London: George Bell & Sons. p. 191.
→ Notes Sial tribe among settled Muslim agricultural groups in Sindh.
- Gazetteer of the Province of Sind. Bombay: Government Press. 1907. p. 268.
→ Lists “Sial villages” in Sindh’s Kandiaro taluka, Naushahro Feroze.
- "Member Profile – Ghazalla Sial". Provincial Assembly of Sindh. Retrieved 5 July 2025.
→ A Sindhi-speaking politician from Khairpur elected as MPA under the Siyal name.
- "Village Ghulam Hyder Siyal, Kandiaro Taluka". Humanitarian Data Exchange. Retrieved 5 July 2025.
→ Confirms existing Siyal village in Sindh.
- Schimmel, Annemarie (1986). Pearls from the Indus. Oxford University Press. p. 111.
→ Notes the legend of Heer Sial retold in Sindhi oral literature, showing cultural overlap.
Reason for edit
[edit]Currently, the page only refers to the Sials as a “Punjabi clan” and only lists Punjabi as their language. However, multiple credible sources show they are also a **Sindhi-speaking tribal group** with historic and ongoing presence in Sindh, recognized in colonial gazetteers and modern government data. Adding these changes helps reflect the full scope of the Sial/Siyal identity and ensures accuracy for readers. Thank you Slowturtle33 (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:02, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
| 19 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:36, 5 July 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Underbar dk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- +1 This editor writes awesome articles. Toadspike [Talk] 15:20, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Done asilvering (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- M.Billoo2000 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yoblyblob (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Etzedek24 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Human Right Wiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Note: This request is not for myself.
Dear admins, please grant the WP:APAT to User:BlaUser234. Otherwise, we see many cockroaches in WP:NPP every day:) Thank you. HumanRight 14:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has created roughly 13 articles. — MusikBot talk 14:30, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Not done Human Right Wiki, you accidentally asked for this for yourself. Can you resubmit? Thanks. -- asilvering (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Ctxz2323 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Ctxz2323 has created nearly 170 articles, none of which were deleted. All the ones I've checked are very solid and well-sourced. Toadspike [Talk] 15:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- The copyright note from Diannaa from less than a year ago on their talk page makes me a bit nervous. How exhaustive were those source checks? Translationvio in particular tends to be easy to miss if you're not really intentionally looking. -- asilvering (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- BlaUser234 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Resubmitting #User:Human Right Wiki above as a procedural action, not an endorsement on the merits. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Victor Ningthemcha (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, my respect to you! I would like to request for getting autopatrolled rights because I contribute interesting articles to both English and Simple Wikipedia. I have over 700 edits, which is over the requirements, and my account is over 3 months old. If I get autopatrolled rights, I will never forget this appreciation I got and I will continue contributing to Wikipedia, and I will also continue to take responsibilities for my actions. Thanks! Waiting for a feedback. :-) Victor Ningthemcha (talk) 13:06, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 13:10, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- PickleG13 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been on Wikipedia for more than a decade, and I truly feel that it is one of my great passions in life. I have more than 30,000 edits, and I am credited with more than 300 articles that are not Redirects or Disambiguation pages. (I personally take credit for more than 100 of these, which did not originate as Redirect pages.) Although I continue to propose Draft pages to this day when I am not 100% confident myself about notability, I frequently go straight to the mainspace and have made a number of articles that have been significant in some form or field, with my particular focus being on film industry and electoral politics pages.
Recently, I redirected a few thousand Supreme Court of the United States cases to the case volumes in which they were listed. It was a large-scale project for me, but in the end it was decided that redlinks would be better for promoting caseload knowledge, something that I agreed to and I believe will continue to service our Wikipedia community. For this reason, it might appear that I have a large number of deleted pages, but this is almost exclusively due to this particular project; I had an edit deletion rate of less than 2%, and I had not had a page that I created taken down in years, not since I was a far more novice editor. (You can read more about that SCOTUS discussion here.)
I believe that being autopatrolled will continue to allow me to contribute to the Wikipedia community, and that is why I am reaching out to ask for permissions. I am happy to answer any questions or improve any articles that I have created if there is anything noticeable that needs help. Although I have long been looking to increase my permissions and role in the community, I quite frankly have always had impostor syndrome stop me from asking, but a bit of encouragement from Liz made me try. Thank you so much! PickleG13 (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- Vestrian24Bio (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi! I have initiated a couple of RMs myself, and participated in many as well. I also make requests at WP:RMT. I also revert undiscussed page moves while patrolling changes.
Now, I want to contribute more by closing RMs and helping at WP:RMT and this right would also be useful while reverting undiscussed page moves as well.
I have made 170+ RM-related edits and 30+ edits to RMT page. Thanks for considering... Vestrian24Bio 02:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Vikingsam (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to request the Page Mover user right to assist in handling page moves that involve redirect suppression, especially in cases where I am working on article namespace organization, cleanup, or disambiguation work. I have been an active editor on Wikipedia and understand the importance of proper page titling and redirect management.
I am familiar with Wikipedia's naming conventions, the page move process, and the appropriate use of this permission. I intend to use the Page Mover right to reduce the backlog of move requests and to help in cases where administrative assistance would otherwise be needed just to suppress a redirect. Vikingsam (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 880 total edits. — MusikBot talk 01:20, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Fails minimum criteria. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:21, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Floating Orb (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I found a reviewable edit that was not good and had already been reverted the first time it was placed. I reverted the new version of it, since the edit was not following the Wikipedia guidelines. I think that I should have Reviewing pending changes rights, since I have experience with reverting vandalism and disruptive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floating Orb (talk • contribs) 19:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: I added the signature and formatted the request correctly after it was placed (diff). —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 19:47, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Sorry, I still don't think your ready yet. In addition to the complaints from before, you've picked up a copyvio warning since your previous request, which does not bode well. And blanking/archiving your talk page right after making this request, while of course procedurally allowed, reeks of a bad-faith attempt to cover your tracks. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- MakaylaHippo1998 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi I am requesting rights to use the rollback feature as finding vandalism has actually been a very cool thing for me. I am requesting to be able so I don't have to undo multiple edits by spam-vandals, as I feel like it makes me kind of a spammer when I do this, and doing it all at once would be a great thing. I will admit that I had absolutely no idea that anyone could post warnings on talk pages, I thought that only admins and other experienced members who are given rights could do so. I just want to feel like less of a spammer when reverted edits, so I am requesting this rollback feature. Thanks, MakaylaHippo1998 MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Criticize (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. do i have any chance to be given rollback rights to fight vandalism better? If possible. Criticize (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]). — MusikBot talk 16:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Stop WP:Hat collecting. This request says nothing that the previous requests didn't say before. And while you have now mostly started warning other editors, here's another morsel to consider: only a week ago you said
modifications are coming in with blazing speed almost every milli-second
, which is both not true (the average edit rate is around 2 edits per second, or one per 500 milliseconds), and evinces an attitude incompatible with rollback access; it's more important to be correct in what you are reverting, and to take those few seconds to think, than to race to the bottom trying to revert edits as fast as possible. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Shaneapickle (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Vandalism is a very rampant issue on this wiki, and most of the vandalism are made on biography pages, and I want to revert these vandalized edits. Shaneapickle (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
