Template:Admin dashboard/light
- Frequently, some pages transcluding {{Admin dashboard}} are going on overflow and appear at Category:Pages_where_post-expand_include_size_is_exceeded.
This Template:Admin dashboard/light has been rewritten by including directly all the parts that were dispersed in so many sub-templates. - The "leaks out boxes" error has been fixed.
- Pages RFPP and UNFAA are simply linked (i.e. not transcluded) when too busy
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- 180.252.168.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:45, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Unsure. Possibly a FP but left a level I notice. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- 216.212.99.220 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:29, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user, level II. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- 95.26.167.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- 194.211.121.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:26, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Developer Moedax (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1241 (User talk page disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- 105.233.96.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:45, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Daddylebron (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:603:167f:1c60:856d:6664:d5c9:fba (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:59, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Tomy890 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Southwest Airlines was changed by Tomy890 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869838 on 2025-05-21T07:00:38+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 07:00, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- 203.30.15.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Frisian123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Daddylebron (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Evidently a vandalism-only account. See filter log. Parksfan1955 (talk) 07:18, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Editing logged out as 2406:3400:412:CAB0:55CA:9BF6:10E0:45BF (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Parksfan1955 (talk) 07:29, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 3 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 1 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 23 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 55 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – 11 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- DespicableMe2011 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "despicable" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:20, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- AHeinousCrime (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "crime" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- EricBrodieCasinoRoyale2006 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- CJTStudios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- This is probably promo. Secretlondon (talk) 11:27, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Kaydollarofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SchoolDogDays (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Subhadipbhattacharjee3546 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Edittingandcorrecting2025 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Username1127 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Monkeydoodoo (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- ReachAgency (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Potentially related Panasonic. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 16:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Wellnessequityalliance (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Only here for advertising, only edit was to commons to upload a photo that according to EXIF metadata was "for advertising purposes only". All the Best -- Chuck Talk 20:32, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck: As it says above,
please do not report accounts with no edits
. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:36, 20 May 2025 (UTC) - @Alachuckthebuck report them on Commons, not here. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:21, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Alachuckthebuck: As it says above,
- Tung tung tung sahur is the goat! (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Implies sock of Tung tung tung sahur oh my god?. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Myrealnamm: It is a meme, so I doubt the two users are connected by more than their shared interest in the meme. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ope.... Ok. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Nonetheless, "meme" usernames can be a sign of intent to disrupt or troll. At this stage, however, it's best to
Wait until the user edits. Patient Zerotalk 03:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Nonetheless, "meme" usernames can be a sign of intent to disrupt or troll. At this stage, however, it's best to
- Ope.... Ok. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:19, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Myrealnamm: It is a meme, so I doubt the two users are connected by more than their shared interest in the meme. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Manal2025 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Masjid Suleman Dawood. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:45, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Jlwoodwa, how is "Manal2025" promotional? I do not see the connection. Cullen328 (talk) 06:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I probably should have spelled that out further. From the second citation:
This means "MANAL" is an acronym for the title of an organization. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:51, 21 May 2025 (UTC)The Muslim Association of Newfoundland and Labrador has been looking for a new space for 15 years, says president Haseen Khan.
- Sorry, I probably should have spelled that out further. From the second citation:
- Jlwoodwa, how is "Manal2025" promotional? I do not see the connection. Cullen328 (talk) 06:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Bookurtaxi (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). See their sandbox article. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:51, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Autumn Leaves Care (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:Diff/1291430616. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:54, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Vegas11.io (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:AbuseLog/40856538. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:55, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Mercymediahouse1 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:Mercymediahouse1/sandbox. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:01, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sripadastudios3086 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Rahaoil (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:03, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- 9pm films (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:9pm films. Annh07 (talk) 07:12, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- QuantemDUD (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:QuantemDUD/sandbox. Annh07 (talk) 07:29, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – One ip disrupting the article by adding unsourced and un-announced matches. Another ip disrupted by adding replacing names of coaching stuffs. The u23 team is a topic of discussion going on in Indian football community and thus such edits can be expected to occur in coming few weeks, a temporary page protection is needed. Drat8sub (talk) 18:26, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent BLP violation going on for days. Azuredivay (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- +1 Lots of disruption. Might need at least a few months semi given the protection log and page history. Entranced98 (talk) 19:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent vandalism, unsourced content additions and 'notable people' disruption. Entranced98 (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: See if we can get them to talk page. Moxy🍁 21:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Consistent vandalism Rochambeau1783 (talk) 21:30, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 05:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Significant amount of IP vandalism from dynamic IPs and new accounts over the past 24 hours. Sable232 (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Multiple IPs vandalizing the page. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This draft article was recently moved to and from mainspace without authorization by user "Kyoto kimi", disrupting the review process. The same user (or someone claiming to be them) also contacted the subject off-wiki and attempted extortion via WhatsApp. A report has been filed with Wikimedia Trust & Safety, and evidence submitted.
I respectfully request temporary protection from further unauthorized page moves or disruption while this matter is being reviewed. Cinematic Quill (talk) 21:50, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kyoto kimi reversed their action after 20 minutes, saying that it was a mistake. The likelihood of recurrence seems low, though please report if it does. Sdrqaz (talk) 05:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Kajmer05 (talk) 00:46, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP addresses continuing to add unsourced content and content from unreliable sources, since yesterday. 1033Forest (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 02:00, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pending changes seems to be working well; before 20 May, there was nothing for several weeks. Sdrqaz (talk) 05:02, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wave of vandalism across multiple IPs. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:22, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Parksfan1955 (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: It is imformational and someone might discover something new 72.202.243.178 (talk) 20:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- This argument makes zero sense. On a related note, the last time WP:TRYUNPROT was done on this particular article, it had to be reinstated just over three weeks later. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:10, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Soy Isabel Zuleta, he intentado actualizar la información de mi Wikipedia sin éxito. Estaré atenta a su respuesta. IsabelZuleta (talk) 20:59, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Translation of the above: "I'm Isabel Zuleta. I've been trying to update my Wikipedia information without success. I'll be waiting for your response."
- Responce, in English: This page is not protected on the English-language Wikipedia. Administrators here can do nothing for pages on the Spanish-language Wikipedia.
- @IsabelZuleta: Responce, in Spanish [automated translation]: Esta página no está protegida en la Wikipedia en inglés. Los administradores de este proyecto no pueden hacer nada con las páginas de la Wikipedia en español. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 00:09, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add "#REDIRECT Niggas in Paris" {{R from incorrect name}} Easternsahara (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- As a note, this will require an administrator as the title is blacklisted. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:18, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Is there any evidence this song is referred to in the singular? * Pppery * it has begun... 21:16, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:58, 20 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:59, 21 May 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- Kjansen86 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right.— MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)- @LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the
{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC) - @LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hteiktinhein (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) At the pace this editor is creating, I would expect granting the flag to help reduce the backlog. These are solid articles; talk pages are created, which helps as well. I am AGF'ing on the Burmese language sources but have no concerns. @Hteiktinhein, a couple nits: on Padein Prince rebellion, the section of "Members" with an unexplained bulleted list is a bit confusing, and on Thetpan Mibaya, the "see also" section should go above the references section per MOS:LAYOUT. But these are just small things to keep in mind for the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Dclemens1971 Thank you very much for your kind comment on my contributions. I plan to continue creating more content related to Burmese history, especially topics that are still missing from the English Wikipedia.
- Although access to Wikipedia has been banned in Myanmar across all language versions, I am able to contribute using the ipblock-exempt right.
- Please don't worry about the Burmese-language sources — I have substantial knowledge of Burmese history, particularly the Konbaung era, and I have access to both online and offline versions of the Konbaung Chronicle and other historical texts. I appreciate your helpful notes regarding some minor issues in my articles, such as the structuring of See also sections and now fixed, and I'll certainly keep them in mind going forward. Best regards. Hteiktinhein (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, may I ask what the issue is? There doesn’t seem to be any problem on my side, and all the other users who applied at the same time have already been granted the rights. Why am I the only one delayed? Hteiktinhein (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- MerlinVtwelve (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Reviewed the last several articles, and while your grasp of notability is strong, I did find an instance of WP:CLOP on your most recent creation that is very close to the line of copyvio if not over it. See Copyvio Detector results. This article is otherwise very well done! Two other things to consider when creating articles: create talk pages (the WP:RATER tool is helpful here) and make sure at least one other page links to yours. If you were to be autopatrolled, orphaned pages would likely stay orphaned longer. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Dclemens1971thanks for the review!. I'll revisit those sections and re-word them. Will keep an eye on WP:CLOP and linked pages in future. Will check out WP:RATER also. Cheers, merlinVtwelve (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Phantomdj (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I reviewed @Phantomdj's last 10 article creations, and they are overall quite good. Well-formatted, clean copy. They all appear to be compliant with WP:NASTRO. It would be helpful if they could create talk pages for their creations (the WP:RATER tool is helpful for this) but otherwise I think the project would benefit from Phantomdj being autopatrolled. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Done thank you Dclemens1971 for the notes! If you run into any issues please feel free to reach out, I'll review your edits over the next 30 days and if there are issues I'll let you know. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Butters.From.SouthPark (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am autopatrolled and a trial NPP reviewer nominating Butters.From.SouthPark to be autopatrolled. The 524th editor by article creations (1435 live), this user's extensive work on articles of American football, basketball, and baseball players is highly appreciated. All ten of their most recent article creations and eight articles that I have drawn at random all demonstrate WP:ATHLETE/WP:NSEASONS notability and follow WP:BLP policy. In the seven instances of their pages created being deleted, two were later recreated, one was effectively recreated at Andre Jones Jr. after WP:G8 deletion, and two were deleted under WP:G7. Though I agree with Liz for PRODing Clemson–Ohio State football rivalry over low notability as a distinct topic, the Dayton Daily News has recognized that all four match-ups of this pair were significant (link). Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Jurgle is the only instance of article creation that clearly failed WP:GNG, but that can be forgiven for occurring within their first month here. They have no AfD participation to assess their judgement of others' content, but since this permission only affects the supervision of their creations, that seems fine. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 02:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC) ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 02:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done if you run into any problems please feel free to reach out. I will review your work in ~30 days and if there are any issues I'll let you know. This is not to say that I don't believe you'll do something wrong, more just a check in to make sure everything is going smoothly. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- BullDawg2021 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have started 300+ pages and have been editing for over three and a half years consistently. Early on, I struggled with notability, but I have since demonstrated an understanding for the notability guidelines. I would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks, Bulldawg (talk) 06:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Throughthemind (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created a large number of articles, all without any significant issues. Another user proposed on my talk page that I request to be Autopatrolled. Throughthemind (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- 2010isGenZ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm a trusty person and a reformed vandal, sorry for that 2010isGenZ (talk) 04:37, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- Iljhgtn (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Iljhgtn even though the permission gives you the technical ability to move categories, category moves should still go through WP:CFD/WP:CFDS. Do you have uses for the permission other than moving categories? Elli (talk | contribs) 02:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, for helping draftify of new articles etc. Iljhgtn (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- The scripts: User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft and User:Mr. Stradivarius/gadgets/Draftify both look like they would be particularly useful. Iljhgtn (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Not done per lack of demonstrated need (since you have only ever moved one page to draftspace and commented in one CfD). @Iljhgtn: You can still use MoveToDraft with no additional work for you, as it will automatically request speedy deletion. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 03:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- The first demonstrated need was the category move component, only secondarily did I mention what you cite as the reason for declining..... Iljhgtn (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- As Elli noted, and as explained at Wikipedia:Page mover § move-categorypages, category moves should be requested at CFD/CFDS, not done boldly by pagemovers or admins. And in my comment above I noted that you have only ever commented in one CFD. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 22:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- The first demonstrated need was the category move component, only secondarily did I mention what you cite as the reason for declining..... Iljhgtn (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- The scripts: User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft and User:Mr. Stradivarius/gadgets/Draftify both look like they would be particularly useful. Iljhgtn (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, for helping draftify of new articles etc. Iljhgtn (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Garsh2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Good day,
When reviewing pages, I frequently encounter situations such that this permission would be useful or necessary. These include redirect suppression when draftifying to reduce the number of R2s needed and the ability to move pages over single-revision redirects when accepting AFC drafts, which can occasionally present a barrier. I would also like to help with uncontroversial category and technical moves. I meet the WP:PMCRITERIA and believe I have a demonstrated both a need for the permissions and an understanding of the associated guidelines. Garsh (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Garsh2: I'd grant this based on your NPR and AfC purposes, but if you want to help with with category and technical moves (which are generally not revertible by non-pagemovers), you should first have some experience participating in CfD and RMs respectively. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 03:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- @SilverLocust: Understood. I will not touch those types of moves (even with the permission) until I gain experience in those areas. Garsh (talk) 16:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done initially for 3 months. JensonSL (SilverLocust) 22:28, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- TheDoctorWho (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've found myself making semi-regular requests at WP:RM/TR (7 in the last two years, 13 overall). I feel like this is one of the things I could just handle myself instead of bothering others with, and could potentially help out with as I see fit. I don't currently plan on closing any RM discussions, but I am very familiar with WP:NCTV, which is my main topic area, that I rarely branch out out of, and the general policy laid out at WP:NC. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Opm581 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to have the pending changes reviewer right so that I can help fight vandalism and deal with pending changes backlogs. I revert vandalism and other inappropriate edits when I come across them when I'm recent changes patrolling or viewing my watchlist. I also believe that I meet the WP:PCCRITERIA. Thanks for considering my request. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 23:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- HirowoWiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I am requesting pending changes reviewer rights. When reviewing changes, it should be well-known constructive edits or inappropriate edits wherever should be accepted or declined. Rollback rights has also been granted. –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Macaw* (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I am requesting the pending changes reviewer right to help the project. I have read through all the relevant policys and have been patroling recent changes for a while now. If you have any questions feel free to ask me. Please ping me to notify me of comments or a decision here. Macaw* 17:59, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Scoria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to be granted the pending changes reviewer rights to combat potential vandalism. Scoria (talk) 13:32, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello i would love to request pending changes reviewer to help reduce the pending changes backlog. Destinyokhiria (talk) 03:14, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Skratata69 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Chippla360 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I will love to request for the rollback permission so I can help fight against vandalism and revert unconstructive edits, I’m also interested to use the wp:ANVDL tool to detect vandalism more easily. I believe meet the requirements and I took the feedbacks after my last request was declined over the last 1 month, I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes since then and I’m here again. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 06:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 06:50, 14 May 2025 (UTC)- Pinging Aoidh, I’ll love your take, I’ve been waiting patiently too, I’ve improved over the last month and have been explaining reasons for my revert and warn editors. An admin should please evaluate my request so I can continue what I love doing. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 23:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- ArachnidInner (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hey there :3
I'm looking for rollback perms so I can speed up my vandal reversion by using tools such as huggle. I don't have any issues with RedWarn but my more experienced friends tell me that huggle is much nicer and faster to use. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 00:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- KnowDeath (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Rollback would make it easier for me to revert vandalism. KnowDeath (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC) KnowDeath (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- PunjabiEditor69 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I need rollback rights to revert vandalism. I have reverted some vandalism attempts. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 165 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 11:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have 216 edits now. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Shahin (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I wish to receive rollback rights to use Wikipedia:Huggle, Wikipedia:AntiVandal and some others, with this permission I could revert vandalism so much faster. Shahin (talk) 10:08, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- VeritasVanguard (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I respectfully request the rollback right to enhance my anti-vandalism efforts on Wikipedia. My monitoring of recent changes has enabled me to effectively identify and revert disruptive edits. The rollback feature would increase the efficiency of my contributions and help maintain content integrity. I understand the responsibilities of this privilege and will adhere strictly to Wikipedia's guidelines. VeritasVanguard☎ 13:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 14:00, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello admins, I’m requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work . Destinyokhiria (talk) 03:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
