User talk:Assadzadeh

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2024/December; 2025/February;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This user is a member of
WikiProject National Football League.

AFL-NFL Merger - Details of Agreement

Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AFL%E2%80%93NFL_merger&oldid=1274779024

I appreciate that you regarded my edit as in good faith. Thank you. However, I would like to know why you claimed my edit was “unnecessary”. I gave my reasons for why my edit was necessary--that it would clarify the AFL-NFL merger process. You did not give any reasons; you simply pronounced my edit “unnecessary” and reverted it. I believe this is not in alignment with the WP:DONTREVERT and WP:BADREVERT principles, particularly the first, “Do not revert unnecessary edits (i.e., edits that neither improve nor harm the article).” (My edit does not make the article worse.) And, secondly, “Even if you find an article was slightly better before an edit, in an area where opinions could differ, you should not revert that edit,”. Further you did not apply the WP:PARTR principles of alternatives to reverting. You did not reach out discuss and did not offer any alternative text.

Please review why you regarded my edit as unnecessary and we can perhaps have the community discuss it and, if need be, absent consensus, go to dispute resolution. (And, if you prefer, I can move this to the article’s talk page. I apologize if this not the proper talk page for this discussion.) Regards, MirelesJ (talk) 07:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MirelesJ I felt that your edit was poorly worded and didn't make any sense nor added clarify to the merger agreement. Also, the source that you provided is illegible and cannot be used to verify that what you added is accurate. Assadzadeh (talk) 14:41, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Assadzadeh, did you understand the content of the edit?

I had no trouble reading the text in the source reference and was able to quote it accurately. It's not illegible, either. MirelesJ (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understood the content of the edit, but felt that it could have been worded better.

The source looks like it was scanned from an original hardcopy document and wasn't legible to me, even when I tried to zoom in. My suggestion would be that instead of trying to quote the source verbatim, that you come up with your own verbiage that makes sense. Assadzadeh (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of SFC Chapions (1960-69)

Hello, Assadzadeh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of SFC Chapions (1960-69), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Footprint Center a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into PHX Arena. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. oknazevad (talk) 14:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking redirects

Please do not blank redirects from moves, as you did here, especially if they've been a long-standing article title (as is the case here). The resulting redirect needs to be preserved to prevent links from breaking, and deletion is completely unwarranted. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:08, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CycloneYoris Actually, they have not been long-standing article titles. What happened is that I moved the following two articles:

1) History of the National Hockey League (1967–1992) to History of the National Hockey League (1967–1991)

2) History of the National Hockey League (1992–2017) to History of the National Hockey League (1991–2017)

The redirects were created as a result. However, within an hour I moved the articles back to their original titles, as I realized that the moves would affect numerous other articles as well. I also changed back the few links that I had revised on other articles as well. Therefore, the redirects can be deleted without breaking links. Assadzadeh (talk) 02:29, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]