Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

8 May 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< May 07	May 09 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Marc Coppola (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this actor and DJ with notable relations. I can't find any significant coverage in independent sources to add. There are passing mentions verifying some of his roles. I do not think he meets WP:NACTOR, WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Redirect to Coppola family might work. Tacyarg (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, California, New York, Washington, and Wisconsin. Tacyarg (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Raza Aizad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. All sources I found had no significant coverage. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 23:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elissa_Shevinsky

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability has not been established for this person. Page was previously nominated for deletion Barrettsprivateers (talk) 23:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Malame Mangzha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is next to no coverage of her outside of social media and mentions on the company website. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 15:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I find this untrue, as i cited references mentioning her. infact, i did not cite any company website. please review again Alan Gadzama (talk) 14:22, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The only mention of her is an excerpt of an interview, and interviews do not contribute to notability as they are just the person talking about themselves. Maybe those articles might help the notability of her company, but nothing supports the notability of her as a person. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 14:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - leadership of a company or NGO doesn't inherit notability from the organization they lead. I don't oppose a redirect. Bearian (talk) 08:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a search for sources fails WP:SIGCOV Vegantics (talk) 19:06, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to African International Documentary Festival Foundation. Insufficient secondary WP:SIGCOV. Hmr (talk) 22:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if editors think that Deletion or Redirection is a better closure decision.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Mersey Pirate

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/The Mersey Pirate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can't have it both way if this page goes which at least has a few ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tricky_(TV_series)_(2nd_nomination) then this page along with a few others have to go aswell since it has NO proper REF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyseiko (talk • contribs) 15:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nominator, please read WP:BEFORE. Have added three references. If other editors do not agree this article meets WP:GNG then I suggest merge or redirect to List_of_television_programmes_broadcast_by_ITV. Orange sticker (talk) 08:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it has reliable third person sources to justify a Wikipedia article. If other editors disagree it should be merged to List_of_television_programmes_broadcast_by_ITV.Dwanyewest (talk) 18:05, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Saturday Show (1982 TV series)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can't have it both way if this page goes which at least has a few ref Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricky (TV series) (2nd nomination) then this page along with a few others have to go aswell since it has NO proper REF. IT would be double standards.. --Crazyseiko (talk) 16:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 16:46, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is considered an illegitimate argument against deletion; is its converse valid for deletion? —Tamfang (talk) 05:51, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG. It gets a little coverage in sources like A History of Television in 100 Programmes (2015) by Phil Norman and Screen Burn (2005) by Charlie Brooker but I didn't see enough to suggest that the subect is notable enough for its own article. I wouldn't be surprised if there are sources out there, please ping me if good ones are identified. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an essay, not a policy or guideline. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Telegantic Megavision

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

You can't have it both way if this page goes which at least has a few ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tricky_(TV_series)_(2nd_nomination) then this page along with a few others have to go aswell since it has NO proper REF. Its a shame but double standard cant not be allowed.. --Crazyseiko (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond a Doubt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources are all unreliable, and my WP:BEFORE didn't turn up any better sources so as to establish notability through WP:NFILM. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Ghana. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The pages that list Ghanian films by year do not include one for 2023. It may be worthwhile to either create a page for 2023 (and have this as the sole entry until others add more) or to combine the other films into a single article until there's enough to justify breaking it off by year. There's no list on the main page for cinema of Ghana, otherwise it could redirect there, I suppose. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Ganesha811 (talk) 17:12, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are only 3 years in the category "Lists of Ghanaian films" (1980, 2017, 2018), and an article List of Ghanaian submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film, which has only one entry, a film from 2018. List of Ghanaian films of 1983 redirects to an article about a film. There are articles about Ghanaian films from other years, just not included in lists. A list including this film would still need reliable sources - this article has only Youtube and IMDB as sources, so far, and on a quick search I haven't found other, reliable sources. I suspect a list with a single entry might get redirected to the film, which if the film is not notable ends up with a deletion anyway. So I would probably say delete at this point. Anyone with reliable sources would be able to write a new article, whether for this film or Ghanaian films from 2023, or whatever. RebeccaGreen (talk) 14:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mladost, Varna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page for many years. Wikis in other languages do not offer much. Maybe there are relevant refs in local languages that show the GNG is met. JMWt (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Bulgaria. JMWt (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A quick look in Bulgarian sources shows routine notability - it's one of the largest districts of Varna after all - but it's such a simple stub that what little is there could just be merged to Varna until someone wants to have a better crack at this. SportingFlyer T·C 19:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - AfD is not a venue for cleanup. A district with 84,000 inhabitants and an administrative apparatus of local governance, easily passes WP:NGEO. --Soman (talk) 23:52, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly meets the relevant WP:GEOLAND guideline. Needs better sourcing and could easily be merged if people prefer but outright deletion is neither necessary or approrpiate. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ilker Furat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Boxing and Turkey. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Management, and Aviation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Twirling Toadstool

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in RS PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable theme park ride. No coverage i can find Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 22:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Alton Towers#Main Past Attractions – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 12:24, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nushell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no coverage in reliable sources. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: [1]^[1] has a mention. 内存溢出的猫 (talk) 06:40, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We can have higher standards than this, right? This is a writeup, in conference paper form, of a student's experience with contributing to Nushell as an open source project as part of a course on open source projects. This hardly strikes me as a reliable source. ~ A412 ^talk! 13:36, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing major about it. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 22:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kayla Jean Carter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. No significant sources to speak of. She didn't even win the Miss Charm Philippines beauty pageant, a title of very recent and somewhat dubious(?) existence. She was appointed when the titleholder withdrew. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Beauty pageants, Philippines, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 23:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:48, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Hurghada attack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT and WP:NOTNEWS. Coverage is in the immediate days after the attack, no WP:LASTING or WP:SUSTAINED that establish WP:GNG. Open to an appropriate merge target. Longhornsg (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Terrorism, Egypt, Armenia, Czech Republic, and Germany. Longhornsg (talk) 20:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Terrorism in Egypt#Red Sea resort attacks (2016–17), where it is mentioned. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for a Redirection?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Info (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBAND, promotional, no reliable sources to support. Closest thing I could find directly about the band was a merch site [2]. GoldRomean (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GoldRomean (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Well, I edited it a couple hours ago, and conjured only these three sources ([3], [4], [5]) by typing "Colombia" and "INFO" and "metal". Couldn't find anything on their albums. Potentially leaning towards weak keep, but we need plus ~1 source. LastJabberwocky (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Leaning towards keep. —LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:37, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An obscure band among a million bands. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 22:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare at Home

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The NGO is not notable, with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Unicorbia (talk) 11:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disparity between search engines. Google returns different results compared to DuckDuckGo for example when searching the NGO. Using only Google perhaps yields a narrow or biased return. 2A00:23C6:F213:4101:968:2B7B:BF67:615B (talk) 06:19, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article displays similar references and citations as other NGO’s and organisations in the genre. I feel the NGO is notable but can see the counter argument as well. Thanks and good luck! Beusefulbekind (talk) 12:50, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:23, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When the NGO’s website is entered into a search engine images are returned suggesting an indexing issue over lack of significant coverage. https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&sca_esv=017810d95fc5d12f&q=www.shakespeareathome.org&udm=2&fbs=ABzOT_BwhWbvgbq2-ldlJF_Xac4lwl4ZcQUKTNIEuq5aS_Zepj3qrSaXICRsYV5N74W3tzTRfsLFSrRz7ve1CoHJgcglLv8SGrSnkSeQFpu99wkeRdrZTbMXqXfA4_2TUZF5W45mnxYixR6y-5GTsKmF4TU8r9fiioDaNvE04XkK00AiS4qkNAWLdgnUAFsVApJDZA96ejXZyPTbx_jw3pTzfiHatMhw34ZCCznojS7RIg27Jp-Vdsc&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiVj7PtwvKMAxUGWkEAHZaHLDoQtKgLegQIGBAB&biw=402&bih=677&dpr=3 2A00:23C6:F213:4101:968:2B7B:BF67:615B (talk) 06:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I have searched business news archives and various methods through Google, other academic archives, and found zero results related to this NGO. If there are reliable, independent sources that indicate the subject's notability, I could not find them. Anything I missed is greatly appreciated but this is a tough subject to search for due to the many things out there that are called some permutation of "shakespeare at home". -- Recon rabbit 19:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Francesconi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The was PRODed and should have been pruned then, but here we are. Claims on the page fall into two categories: true but not noteworthy, and not supported by any source so unverifiable or possibly false. The only verifiably true claim is that the subject is a FIDE Arena Grandmaster. This may sound impressive but this conveys no status in international chess. The AGM title is a recent invention of FIDE to garner some money from online chess -- in other words, a cash grab. The chess game victory in the article is a blitz game over another non-notable chess player of moderate club strength at best. The claim that the subject represented Italy in the Chess Olympiad is almost certainly false since his national ranking among Italian players is 10888 and he has no over-the-board titles. This is shown clearly at the FIDE Profile link used to try to cite the Olympiads claim but which actually punctures it. The claim of a 2021 tournament victory points to an irrelevant page of chess book reviews from 2006. Similarly the claims of tournament successes in 2022 points to a page listing winners of the Czech championship. Obviously these references were copied from different articles and have no connection to the subject. The verifiable claims are not notable and the notable claims are not verifiable. Quale (talk) 22:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom.. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even notable enough to have an Italian Wiki page. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 23:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. 10888th best chess player in Italy is not a claim to notability. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 23:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sono Mirai wa Ima

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails notability guidelines for music; it's a song by a not super well known artist, and this song hasn't won any awards, received coverage, etc. This article doesn't have any citations and is very short. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Japan. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Good Dreams per nom. No hits on Japanese google that is worth mentioning. JP article is also unref. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:16, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The claims in the nomination seem to indicate that a WP:BEFORE was not performed in Japanese or that the nominator is not familiar with Japanese music. I don't have any problem with the suggested redirection unless sources are found, but this song did chart nationally in Japan indicating possible notability under WP:NSINGLE, and the group has at least 7 top-10 albums which belies the claim that the artists are obscure. I would suggest trying to find sources in Japanese before nominating similar articles in the future. Dekimasuよ! 22:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello -- thanks for pointing that out; I'm not knowledgeable in this area and in the future I will search for sources in the original language. My statement that the group wasn't notable was incorrect, I agree with the redirect idea. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, is there more support for Redirection? Or other options?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Big Four (cycling)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some sources will speak of a big 6, others of a big 3: this is arbitrary and very fleeting. Unthinkable to many to suggest that Matthieu van der Poel is not part of the biggest n riders at the moment. A few years ago there was an entirely different top few riders, in 5 years these guys won't be winning any more. Nothing of lasting relevance: this is a no more than a questionable snapshot of standings in the sport right now. Kevin McE (talk) 22:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand there are probably one-off cases of sources using "Big N" to discuss random groups of riders, but considering there are multiple independent sources (e.g. [6] [7]) that define the term (not just mentioning it in passing), there are articles that discuss inclusion in the group (Is Remco Evenepoel Part of Pro Cycling’s ‘Big Four’?), and sources that refer to coverage of the group ([8] references "the much-talked about 'Big Four'"), I think this rises beyond an "arbitrary" grouping.

There has been usage of the term for this specific group of riders for nearly a year and a half (since December 2023), and frequent usage by many different organizations since the 2024 Tour de France, which I feel is more than "very fleeting". It would be a different conversation if I had created this article immediately after the 2024 Tour, but considering usage has continued and frequently appears in articles and previews for 2025 events (for example, these two previews for the 2025 Giro d'Italia starting this weekend both mention the Big Four: [9] [10]).

Mathieu van der Poel is not a GC contender for stage races, which is likely why he is not included in this grouping, which the article (and quoted sources) make clear is about success in stage races and Grand Tours, not a general group of "top riders" Verylongandmemorable (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already commented but just wanted to add: I think the argument that "in 5 years these guys won't be winning any more" conflicts with WP:CRYSTALBALL. Whether or not these riders are successful in the future, the term is widely used currently and has been defined since 2023. Assuming that it will be forgotten is not a prediction we are able to confidently make (and IMO is a bold prediction considering 3 of the 4 riders are 28 years old or younger) Verylongandmemorable (talk) 23:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple reliable sources are included in the article, specifically referring to the term Big Four.[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Please provide sources to support the claims of Big 6, Big 3, et cetera. Flibirigit (talk) 22:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Julián Muñoz (alpine skier)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I was unable to find anything about this person. The only sources i was able to find are about 2 other people named Julian Munoz, one from Spain and other from Columbia. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Costa Rica. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I understand it might be tricky to distinguish people with the same name if you are unfamiliar with the language, but there are sources about this in Costa Rican press, e.g. [18][19]. The basic facts also seem to be mentioned in historical sources about Olympics [20]. Although everything I found are just very brief passing mentions. MarioGom (talk) 09:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Costa Rica at the 1992 Winter Olympics where his name is mentioned. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Request a relist to allow for more time for me to search. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 22:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Logsdon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. Not a single secondary source. All passing mentions. scope_creep^Talk 09:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:28, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Widespread coverage of films she has directed and edited. Article just must be expanded. Thriley (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thriley: I saw you working on to expand it, which is laudable. Do you have secondary coverage? It lot of seems to surface and no depth. WP:THREE will do. scope_creep^Talk 19:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think she meets notability per WP:AUTHOR: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work." The documentary films she has directed have received widespread coverage. I have not done a deep search for articles solely about Logsdon, but I think the coverage on her works makes that unnecessary for notability concerns. Thriley (talk) 19:53, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thriley: The subject isnt an author as far as I can seen. She is a creative type. I need WP:THREE secondary sources that prove she is notable. Not passing mentions or interview or PR. scope_creep^Talk 18:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It seems maintainable, but some parts of it require (more) sources. 110 and 135 (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 22:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Russell J. Nelson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable. Of the three sources, honorstates.org is user generated, There were others is an unpublished primary source memoir, and the Morton source does not contain SIGCOV. A WP:BEFORE search does not reveal any additional sources of note. 🌸⁠wasianpower⁠🌸 (talk • contribs) 22:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prescott Currier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He was a World War II cryptography lieutenant, but I see no substantiation for the unsourced claim that he "played a major role in the Cryptanalysis of the Enigma". There are passing mentions, which fail to satisfy WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Hiestand (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prolific actor, but no major roles as far as I can see, so he fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. He was in some major films, such as The Pride of the Yankees and The Day the Earth Stood Still, but uncredited, as he was in most of his filmography. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Wisconsin. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maratha invasion of Deccan (1739)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There didn't happen any conflict by such a name in 1739. This is WP:OR The invasion timeline is 1739-40 and battle happened in 1740, even that doesn't have such a title it's known as Battle of Aurangabad or Battle of Godavri (1740) [21] [22]. No source used here mentions a title Maratha invasion of Deccan (1739). The author has used WP:SYN throughout. Additionally, the sources used for the battle result and treaty section are not considered reliable (WP:RS). One of the sources [23] used for mentioning the result (Nizam's victory) opposes itself on Pg 28 and 109 questioning it's reliability. The other one used for displaying result [24] is not even a historian but a civil servant. The article's body is not written from a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV) as evident in body lead and aftermath section with some sources given more priority. That sources are unreliable too as addressed before. So, the article does not pass WP:GNG currently and needs to be deleted. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kat Milligan-McClellan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Assistant professor (microbiology) with an h-factor of 10 (GScholar), 930 total citations and no awards. She has made a good start, but she is 5-10 years from reaching any of the criteria for academics. WP:TOOSOON by a long way. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think she is ok. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 22:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:Prof; not enough for GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Gefle IF (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only valid entry is Gefle IFcode: swe promoted to code: sv . With the exception of Gefle IF Friidrottcode: swe promoted to code: sv , none of the other entries is mentioned anywhere else on Wikipedia. The mentions of Gefle IF Friidrottcode: swe promoted to code: sv are all uses, not definitions, nothing we could link to. Paradoctor (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Disambiguations. Paradoctor (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unity, Idaho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPLACE, There is a irrigation center, and a handful of houses, but nothing noteworthy about this "community". ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If there was never a community named Unity in the area, why was it on listed on maps? However, you are correct in that there is not much left now of the former community. An Errant Knight (talk) 21:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep
- This source states that Unity was a populated place.
- This source calls it a "community".
- The county recognizes Unity as a voting precinct. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

John Pringle (British Army officer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article as it stands does not demonstrate that this individual was notable. It lacks reliable sources. This article fails WP:GNG. Aneirinn (talk) 20:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 20:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Lived, got married and died, I'm not seeing notability for this person. The house is a listed building, could perhaps be a brief mention there, but there is no article for the residence. There was a physician with the same name, born about 100 yrs earlier, that comes up in sources. Nothing for this fellow. Oaktree b (talk) 21:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Petroaesthetics and Contemporary Art of Southwest Asia and North Africa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a student article that has become a bit of a coatrack article with a POV split. The article itself requires a § Terminology section just to define its own criteria and then some background on the types before listing works that match the criteria. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 20:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Queer Contemporary Art of Southwest Asia and North Africa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a student article that has become a bit of a coatrack article with a POV split. The article itself requires a § Terminology section just to define its own criteria and then is otherwise mostly determined by exhibitions and events, festivals and initiatives pertinent to that criteria. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 20:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Sexuality and gender, and Middle East. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Six Flags Great Adventure Rolling Thunder Incidents

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NLIST. Listing of non-notable incidents. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks, Lists, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as entirely duplicated from Incidents at Six Flags parks § Rolling Thunder but does not pass as a standalone list. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 23:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Leitz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like none of the sources cited are independent coverage of the subject. Mostly interviews, press releases, company profiles, and even articles written by him. So many of the links are dead that I suspect this was written by Gen AI. Additionally, I found zero hits in Swiss newspaper sources of any kind, which is quite remarkable (in a bad way). Toadspike [Talk] 19:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Switzerland, California, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find sources from Business Wire, which are press releases. Source 10 in the article is the only RS and the rest aren't helpful (and #10 isn't enough for sourcing). Even on .ch websites, not much of anything comes up. Oaktree b (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Musfiq Mannan Choudhury

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly passing mentions in sources and he isn't a highly-cited researcher ([25]). It does note he is a vice-chancellor of a university, but this institution doesn't seem particularly noteworthy or reputable (although perhaps someone who knows more about the regulation of higher ed. in Bangladesh can correct me) Leonstojka (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Bangladesh. Leonstojka (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Basin, Idaho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPLACE and WP:GNG. Satellite views shows this is nothing more than just a post that features only show a house with a barn. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Idaho. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable, although nonspecific name makes it hard to find sources about this place. If such sources could be found I might reconsider. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mehzeb Chowdhury

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the sheer obnoxiousness of this article (which is just one long advert about why the subject is the most awesome and interesting man in the world), I'm not totally convinced it meets the notability criteria. Reasons below:

Many of the sources are just passing mentions, and they aren't always high quality (e.g. a casting website is used to support the claim he is an actor/filmmaker)
A previous editor has marked the article as relying too heavily on sources that may be closely related to the subject. I happen to agree, and the generally sycophantic nature of these articles is off-putting and undermines the case for notability (given his father is a prominent journalist, I wonder if he has some connections with The Daily Star, which is one of the main sources)
The big notability claim is his association with MABMAT, and while that is notable, I'm not sure it justifies Chowdhury having an article to himself. Furthermore, this article seems to credit Chowdhury as the sole inventor, whereas The Times was more balanced, indicating he led a team at Durham University that developed it [26]
As a researcher he has a low h-index [27]
An excessive number of claims rely on primary sources. A few claims aren't even verified (e.g. that he worked for Goal.com as a correspondent) Leonstojka (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Leonstojka (talk) 18:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Journalism, Law, Social science, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (creator) The nomination is strictly reliant on issues regarding the article. Issues regarding an article can be raised in its talk page or Wikiprojects' talk pages (I do admit it needs some work and I'm willing to do them once able but that's irrelevant to an article's notability).
Just because an article is not up to the mark on some aspects, it does not become non-notable. Many of the sources are just passing mentions- not every source of an article need to be of high quality or of depth. An article fo shizz will contain many sources that might just well be passing mentions, supporting the asserted claims.
There exist several sources (in Bengali as well) in and out of the article that definitely speak volume for this person's notability. X (talk) 21:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sudarshan Chakra (air defence system)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was previously redirected to S-400 missile system, but was reverted and asked to take to a deletion discussion. The article is a pure POV fork of the main S-400 article. It is the exact same system, simply called by an alternative name. Reliable sources do not widely refer to the S-400, even in Indian usage, as "Sudarshan Chakra" so it fails WP:COMMONNAME even if it were a separate article. The Sudarshan Chakra (air defence system) article should be deleted, and the page redirected to S-400 missile system. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 18:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and India. Shellwood (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Myriospora elegans

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The species was not validly published (confirmed on both Index Fungorum and MycoBank) and should not have been created to begin with; I believe it was made in an attempt by a now-banned editor to bluelink all of the taxon names (valid or not) on the monstrous dab page C._elegans_(disambiguation). It has no literature presence, so doesn't qualify for a notability bypass (search in quotes recommended because "elegans" is a common epithet). Esculenta (talk) 18:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Commment MycoBank's record for Myriospora elegans Hepp (1860) says the current name is Biatora elegans Zwackh (1850) but the MycoBank record for B. elegans Zwackh say that name is also invalid, while listing as synonyms some other elegans combinations attributed to "Hepp ex A. Massal. (1860)" including Chiliospora elegans. GBIF's M. elegans Hepp record was "deleted" in 2021, but says it is a synonym of of Biatoridium monasteriense, and the GBIF record for B. monasteriense lists some elegans combinations attributed to A.Massal, including Chiliospora elegans. Index Fungorum has a record for Chiliospora elegans Hepp ex A. Massal. "Hepp ex A. Massal" is effectively no different than "A.Massal". I think the Myriospora elegans article could be deleted, but I'm not sure about deleting the Chiliospora elegans redirect that drove the creation of the M. elegans article. Plantdrew (talk) 20:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Riverside, Canyon County, Idaho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPLACE, seems to be nothing more than just a post. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This book: [28] describes it as an irrigation district. These are generally not notable, and are certainly not "communities". Fails WP:NPLACE. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sharif Mohamed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article barely meets WP:GNG it only has 1-2 reliable sources, which isn't enough to prove the subject's importance. The topic doesn't seem to have played any major role, and many of the links are dead. Without more reliable, third-party coverage, this article may not belong on Wikipedia. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Lists of people, News media, Politics, and Maldives. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:NPOL. --hroest 18:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anthony Chaffee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article only has two sources that might good for notability, but that doesn't automatically make the subject notable for Wikipedia and writing tone sounds like advertising, so there might be a conflict of interest. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Lists of people, and Rugby league. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete not notable, and has somewhat fringe views anyway. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Prevost

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Speedy redirect to new primary topic, Pope Leo XIV. Klbrain (talk) 18:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently a two-name disambigaution page. With a person by this name having been vaulted to the papacy, there is no longer any realistic question of a primary topic for this name. Delete, redirect to Pope Leo XIV, and hatnote the set designer there. BD2412 T 17:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. BD2412 T 17:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously. Do we need a discussion? —St.Nerol (talk, contribs) 17:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy redirect to Pope Leo XIV. No need for deletion or discussion per WP:ONEOTHER. This could have been boldly done. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, obviously. Renerpho (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect As that one meme once said, just do it. -boldblazer 17:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close and redirect to Pope Leo XIV. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've speedy redirected; we can worry about hatnotes once the news dies down. Klbrain (talk) 17:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: As the enacting editor, you may close this AfD in accordance with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions#Carrying out the AfD close. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Roobet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are a couple categories of claims to significance here, none of which I believe pass the bar of WP:NCORP. The first is being banned from Twitch. The announcements don't consist of significant coverage of the company itself, and largely don't focus on Roobet, naming it as one of the companies affected by the ban. The other is their sponsorships of a CS:GO tournament and various sports organizations. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from their sponsored tournaments and teams and sponsorship announcements are generally construed to fail WP:ORGTRIV. ~ A412 ^talk! 17:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Cryptocurrency, Companies, and Cyprus. ~ A412 ^talk! 17:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete my bet is that it is not notable. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OneKey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brochure advertising article. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 16:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Companies, and Hong Kong. Shellwood (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, pretty much all of the sources are either primary ones or unreliable ones (such as Crunchbase, press releases from "Chainwire", user-generated reviews from "ScamAdvisor"). Virtually no coverage outside of press releases. Suffers from a severe case of reference bloat to try and make the topic seem notable. Likely can be speedy deleted per G11 ApexParagon (talk) 18:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete not notable, another crypto brochure. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jaafar Jotheri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks like a case of TOO SOON to me. Contrary to the article, he is now a full professor, but doesn't hold a distinguished chair and h-factor looks too low right now. Also an absence of any major awards.

He was awarded a 'Mesopotamian Fellowship' by the American Society of Overseas Research, which may be an encouraging sign of future notability potential, but at this moment I'm not convinced he meets the threshold. Leonstojka (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Leonstojka (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete I agree, this is WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF and doesnt pass #1 or any of the other criteria. 500 citations in total, h-index of 11 is a long way from notability. --hroest 18:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Majid Azami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the RS independent sources mention the subject. Googling does not indicate notability Czarking0 (talk) 16:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 16:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
strongly oppose. He is a highly influential figure in Iran, serving as the CEO of Jey Oil Refining Company and as Deputy Chairman, Managing Director, and Board Member of Sepehr Energy Jahan Nama Pars Company (Sepehr Energy). These companies are significant players in Iran's oil industry, with a combined value of several hundred million dollars (if not more). His role and impact in the business sector are substantial, making him a notable figure deserving of an article.

Additionally, it is worth noting that Majid Azami was sanctioned by the U.S. Department of the Treasury on November 29, 2023, under Executive Order 13224, for facilitating oil sales on behalf of Iran's Armed Forces General Staff. This action underscores his influence and the international attention his activities have received.

I have already added numerous reliable and independent sources in English, Persian, and French that clearly establish his notability. These include news articles and business reports that detail his professional achievements and leadership position. Razgura (talk) 17:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Sirah of the Prophet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find evidence that this is a notable book, sources are blogs, shops, ... Nothing better seems to available through Google Books or News. Fram (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and Islam. Fram (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas William Hanforth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. In fact, having digged around, I found very few mentions in general bar a 2003 article published by the Hymn Society in the United States and Canada and the already cited 'Dictionary of Composers for the Church in Great Britain and Ireland'

The post he held at Sheffield Cathedral doesn't seem inherently notable. Also, the orchestra he conducted was an amateur orchestra. Leonstojka (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Leonstojka (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WifiSkeleton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic seemingly fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Currently, the independent coverage consists of: 1. a tabloid article, 2. an article that relies on the previous article, and 3. an article that cites the subject's fandom page as its source. I did my own search and was unable to find any significant coverage outside of tabloid articles concerning the subject's death. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 15:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 15:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

His death is linked up to his discord server, including a stage talk in discord, unfortunately no one has a recording or a youtube video of this stage announcement , i could add images of his closest friends saying stuff, and due to lack of proof, the only things i have/we got is that he overdosed on drugs. MasonCityIowaUser (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Miami-Dade County Medical Examiners Case Number 2025-01306 is the examiner report for skel, users were told by gothangelz staff not to post it as it provided his full name, any image of the report posted gets deleted which suggests that it is actually him. 2skate (talk) 22:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC) — 2skate (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

This doesn’t matter anyway as it doesn’t establish subject notability. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 23:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“Images of his closest friends saying stuff” are not viable sources. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 23:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 17:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet, Florida, and Georgia (U.S. state). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. His music is good but he's definitely not notable enough. Cyb3rstarz (talk) 19:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely notable enough now, more monthly listeners than jaydes yet jaydes has his own article. He has a song with over 40 million plays that is currently trending on social media and is number 32 on the charts of most popular songs in the US. 2skate (talk) 22:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tagged the article for notability as there is no viable coverage of his music and only tabloid/news farming sites were reporting his death. Sourcing in the article is trash and he has no notable discography, chart activity nor label work. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 20:16, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph M. Cammarata

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ONEEVENT, from what I can find, he has not done anything more notable than be the lawyer for Rudy Giuliani Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:47, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Atzori

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former scholar (he appears to now be working in private sector) with low research impact. Has never held a senior academic post, and his books were not widely reviewed either.

The article was created in 2010, before the subject had even earned his PhD, and was presumably made in order to promote his first book. Leonstojka (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Leonstojka (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR, I could only find 5 entries in JSTOR and no review of his book at all. I found no indication of notability. --hroest 15:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Politics, Italy, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1993 Skate America

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skating competition. No scores, incomplete tables, etc. I had redirected this article to Skate America, but it was reverted. Recommend deletion or forced redirect. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Skating, and United States of America. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1992 NHK Trophy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skating competition. I had redirected this article to NHK Trophy, but it was reverted. Recommend deletion or forced redirect. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Skating, and Japan. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I could find nothing significant. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Naveen Singh Suhag

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet GNG. The sources are mostly not independent (press releases, interviews, a paper written by the subject, company profiles). The ToI article [29] might be sigcov of a company he founded, but the only parts about the subject are quotes from him. This [30] contains a four-sentence mention but really isn't focused on him. The only information I can find in Swiss media is that a person with his exact full name seems to have opened a Subway sandwich store in Langenthal, but the coverage all comes from one source (Berner Zeitung) and is mostly quotes. There are also two hits for his name in reports on judo competitions, far from sigcov. Toadspike [Talk] 15:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Switzerland. Shellwood (talk) 15:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Wrestling. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete not notable. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Croire (album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album fails WP:NALBUM, a cursory search does not help either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

comment I did find this in depth review [31] but not much else and the article is pretty devoid of information. --hroest 17:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is newly created. SRamzy (talk) 23:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not appear to have secondary sources to pass WP:NALBUM. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 23:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aimer c'est tout donner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album fails WP:NALBUM, a cursory search does not help either. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Meher Pudumjee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businesswoman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Maharashtra. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 11:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the subject has won several made up in one day awards for up and coming but run of the mill business person. See also WP:SPAM and WP:NOTFB. Bearian (talk) 08:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient independent significant coverage. Very promotional.Forbes has hundreds of people on its lists each year and a lot of them don't have articles. Being on the list alone doesn't mean you're inherently notable. Per WP:NEWSORGINDIA there are concerns about Indian sources providing paid/sponsored coverage which is in line with the tone of this article. She after all is the daughter of one of India's richest tycoons. - Imcdc Contact 00:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I can see some substantial coverage that meets Wikipedia's notability standard WP:GNG. Here is the In-depth coverage: Forbes, Business Standrad, DNA India, India Today, and potentially additional information can be discovered with a Google search. B-Factor (talk) 06:31, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@B-Factor The 3 Indian news sources are questionable at best due to the high possibility of undisclosed sponsored reporting, especially in reporting people of borderline notability.

Forbes is a reliable source but I'm not sure if that blurb will be enough to pass WP:SIGCOV. It doesn't talk about her personal life at all. ApexParagon (talk) 14:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete for now. When there is more coverage, can build the page again. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Lindesay Watson Wemyss

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears not to meet WP:BIO. The article text says only that he was a Scottish physician. I read through the first cited source [32], an obituary that gives a fairly complete picture of his life, and I don't see anything in there that would meet WP:BIO. —Bkell (talk) 13:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only pull up the obituary as well [33]. Published some papers, but this was before h-factors were a thing, so I don't think we can prove academic notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: his work on polycythemia vera and remodelling of bone in chronic kidney disease is notable. He also has two obituaries: one in the Endinburgh Medial Journal and another in the British Medical Journal. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:41, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Obituaries in the BMJ and EMJ are enough with other the sources to show nobility. Also as a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. KylieTastic (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Scott Robinson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates WP:BLP1E. Should be redirected to List of longest prison sentences. ––FormalDude (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, and Oklahoma. Shellwood (talk) 09:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would very strongly oppose redirecting it there, that is not the kind of list we should be redirecting BLPs.

If there is better sourcing getting the longest prison sentence of all time is notable enough that it IMO invalidates the second prong of BLP1E. So then WP:NCRIMINAL is also a consideration. The sourcing I can find is not great so honestly he probably just fails the WP:GNG. But he does have an extremely generic name so I may be missing stuff. But unless there is more sourcing I failed to find, delete (Not redirect). PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or smerge is as appropriate as the sentence. Bearian (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 14:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kushal N. Desai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A promotional biography of a businessman fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. None of the sources constitute WP:SIGCOV. Majorly citations are WP:NEWSORGINDIA, WP:ROUTINE, and WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS. Just a detailed resume WP:NOTRESUME. Also, simply being the grandson of an industrialist doesn't justify having a Wikipedia page. Notability cannot be inherited. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, India, and Gujarat. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 07:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If User:DGG were alive, he'd probably assume notability, but the consensus is that co-owning a billion-dollar company inherited from grandfather is not automatically inherently notable by inheritance. I'm not against a reasonable redirect. Bearian (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient independent significant coverage. Quite promotional.Notability is not determined by how rich one is. Per WP:NEWSORGINDIA there are concerns about Indian sources providing paid/sponsored coverage which would apply here given he is a billionaire. Pretty in line with the article's tone.- Imcdc Contact 01:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Promotional tone has been written out from the article and there are good independent sources also.The subject is a billionaire and there is enough significant coverage available about him in credible sources like Business Today, Fortune India, Forbes, and online also. He was listed among the top Indian billionaire[34]. The Hurun India Rich List, Fortune India, and Waterfield Advisors are all notable recognitions. The Subject clearly passes WP:NBASIC.Lobbymaster (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This user is creator of the article[reply]
Keep: From reading the sources, the individual seems to have received significant coverage in reliable media publications like Fortune India and Business Today, which are not trivial and satisfy WP:NBASIC. Monhiroe (talk) 08:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 14:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HackMiami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not seem to be notable upon search - no reliable, secondary sources can be found. PROD was proposed & contested in the past for the same reason, so AfD is the only course of action available here. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Technology, and Florida. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Computing. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - there has been some secondary coverage, most notably, Forbes and The Rolling Stone, but the article's tone should be improved. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - numerous articles and information security listings talk about HackMiami. Some are listed in this article already. Many notable people have talked and participated in this event and has been going on for over a decade.

large sponsors such as T-Mobile have sponsored this event and have a sizable following and was even on the cover of rollingstone H477r1ck (talk) 06:16, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 14:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There are many articles about this topic, which makes it notable. Sources are fine. Citadelian (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1980 Wigtown District Council election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly completely uncontested election that I could not find substantitive info on through searches, only vague references. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 03:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Seemingly completely uncontested election"? Some of the wards were contested, just not by members of a formal political party, only by independents. Having only independents standing was pretty common in rural areas in Scotland throughout this time period. Perhaps ward results could be added to indicate that some wards were contested.

I understand there is limited sources available, but https://www.electionscentre.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Scottish-District-Elections-1980.pdfcontains the results to the election. Probably also included in regional/national newspapers of the time but, alas, most archives are locked behind a paywall.

Therefore, I think it should be kept, unless you want to also delete most other Scottish local election pages, for rural areas, from after the reorganisation to ~1995. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is not presumed coverage for local elections of small municipality areas, especially uncontested ones Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 16:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regional newspapers would have something if not result coverage from the time. I managed to find coverage about Moray Council results from 1984, albeit Moray is larger. Obviously would take time to do this every page but would be possible. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This isn't like a parish council election in England, the district elections were covered in the national press because of their importance. I unfortunately don't have access to the British Newspaper Archive any more but a simple search without even looking at any pages shows the importance of the district elections at the time - it was front page news. The results for individual district councils were carried in national newspapers. Unfortunately, the BNA doesn't have any papers from Dumfries and Galloway in May 1980 to further establish notability but it would be the same level of coverage you would expect for any of the current unitary authorities. For comparison with the most recent local elections in the UK, this district council is on a par with the 164 district councils at 2024 United Kingdom local elections#District councils, all of which have their own article (I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument to keep an article but the implication here is that all of those plus every other district council election in the UK are not notable and a simple WP:BEFORE will show that's not the case). Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 08:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I second this. It should probably be kept. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 21:44, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 14:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1977 Wigtown District Council election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taking to AfD over PROD because hard to find sources. I could not find anything from searches in this seemingly small district area. Rationale is a non-notable election in a local area Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 03:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Scotland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Hard to find sources," such is the way with Scottish local elections. https://www.electionscentre.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Scottish-District-Elections-1977.pdf contains the results to the election. As with the 1980 page, I guess ward results, or a newspaper article from the time could also be included. These elections, although small in electors, are very important to Scotland's political story, especially in rural areas. Scotland's rural areas have a history of voting for non-partisan local independents, that is only now being challenged. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 10:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I should note I am willing to improve these pages, if that is what you are getting at... SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 10:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SpeysideWikipedian sources should indicate significant and lasting coverage, which is important with local elections more than anything. Not every small election necessarily deserves a page. Feel free to improve the article with coverage that shows that, but primary sources with only results would not count towards that. This applies to your comment on the other AfD too Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 13:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still, I do not think that is a valid reason to delete this page. Leave the page up and myself and others can improve them. Leave it with a needs sources tag and people such as @Stevie fae Scotland will help improve them I'm sure. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I was to improve every pre 1995 local election page with a similar structure + ward results + newspaper/article as 1974 Tweeddale District Council election would that be sufficient? SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not even that page shows significant coverage meeting GNG in my opinion Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 18:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, work needs done for every page is what I am saying, this is a large project. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

my argument is not every one of these small elections deserves a page. They could also be merged into a wider local election page Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 18:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting thought. Where would you draw the line though? Does each Glaswegian council election deserve its own page just because more people happen to live in Glasgow? How would such a move to a single page be implemented? SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:54, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a precedent for this elsewhere? If the only way these results can be preserved on the wiki is for a mass merger to happen then surely there is an example from another country perhaps? SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps also a wider discussion amongst other local election editors is needed too. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure of other precedent, but it is a solution since these small elections are seemingly not notable on their own. Going on WP:NOTDATABASE, just because there are results available for something, does not mean that it deserves a page of it's own. A merge to a page for elections, in this case to a 1977 Scottish local elections in Dumfries and Galloway page would potentially establish notability for all these elections as a whole Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 19:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would need more input from others before deciding. If that is the way to establish notability I am happy to merge lesser notable pages into a regional district results page. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 19:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This isn't like a parish council election in England, the district elections were covered in the national press because of their importance. I unfortunately don't have access to the British Newspaper Archive any more but a simple search without even looking at any pages shows the importance of the district elections at the time - it was front page news. The results for individual district councils were carried in national newspapers. Unfortunately, the BNA doesn't have any papers from Dumfries and Galloway in May 1977 to further establish notability but it would be the same level of coverage you would expect for any of the current unitary authorities. For comparison with the most recent local elections in the UK, this district council is on a par with the 164 district councils at 2024 United Kingdom local elections#District councils, all of which have their own article (I know WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument to keep an article but the implication here is that all of those plus every other district council election in the UK are not notable and a simple WP:BEFORE will show that's not the case). Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I second this. It should probably be kept. SpeysideWikipedian (talk) 21:45, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 14:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mircea Geoană 2024 presidential campaign

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Campaign page for a candidate who got just over 5%, does not indicate standalone notability. Also covered more in-depth at his own article Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mircea_Geoană#2024_presidential_election. ApexParagon (talk) 01:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Romania. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 14:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kiki Shepard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I doubt the article meets the standards for notability. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 13:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Gommeh ➡️ Talk to me 13:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Texas. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 13:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Very much a WP:HEY candidate; being a co-host of a major syndicated show for fifteen years easily clinches WP:N and sourcing to get her over GNG should be very easy. Nathannah • 📮 19:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't find much coverage, this reads like a rewritten press release with no real author [35]. Gnewspapers brings up a similarly named individual on Broadway in the 1970s, I'm unsure if it's the same person. Oaktree b (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

George Dyer (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could only see minor, routine coverage when I did a search. Although the subject has won a couple of awards, these aren't major. Looks like it might be a case of WP:TOO SOON.

There are also misleading statements designed to look like the subject has received more prominent coverage from sources (e.g. 'On 21 March 2023, it was announced that Dyer would collaborate with Nativity! The Musical director Debbie Isitt again on I Should Be So Lucky. . .' - and the cited source mentions him only very briefly). Finally, the username of the page creator suggests a close connection to the subject. Leonstojka (talk) 13:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. Leonstojka (talk) 13:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alex (footballer, born 1976)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet GNG and no substantive coverage. Declined PROD from a different user as it had previously been deleted Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 13:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Sportspeople, Brazil, and Japan. Svartner (talk) 13:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing GNG being met here, Delete. --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 16:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete has not scored enough goals. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James A. D. W. Anderson

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/James A. D. W. Anderson (3rd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mathematical crackpot with no meaningful impact on the field per WP:ACADEMIC, and no coverage in popular press since initial 2006 spotlight. Academic discourse on "transreal arithmetic" is mostly WP:SELFPUB, barring a couple of papers published in non-mathematical journals. Fishsicles (talk) 11:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes, he does appear to be a crackpot. That might not be sufficient reason for deletion if he had a significant influence on mathematics, but as far as I can see he doesn't. Athel cb (talk) 12:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Compared to other fields, mathematics is much more tolerant of what would normally be labelled "crackpots" - rejecting an established axiom or theory usually means building a contrasting theory, which can be mathematically interesting in its own right. (WP:CRACKPOT's term for this would be "alternative theoretical formulation".) That said, "transreal arithmetic" has absolutely not developed into a theory of any interest to mathematicians, which means I'm more than comfortable applying the label.

I think a particularly useful point of contrast is inter-universal Teichmüller theory, which also makes dramatic claims that are (in the opinion of many number theorists) not properly substantiated, but remains of significant academic interest for its potential applications. "Transreal arithmetic" has attracted no such attention, and the only one to claim applications is Anderson himself. Fishsicles (talk) 14:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is indeed the third nomination of this article, but it is the first under this exact title: the article was first sent to AfD in 2006 with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Anderson (mathematician) (which closed with no consensus), and the second nomination in 2008 was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Anderson (computer scientist) (which closed as keep). (While James Anderson (mathematician) ended up getting deleted in 2006, that was at RfD after the article was renamed shortly after the first AfD.) No opinion on the current nomination. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, Mathematics, Computing, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not worth a page and it is more about Transreal arithmetic than anything else. It is a transreal page, in a sense. Yesterday, all my dreams... (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LGGS J004246.86+413336.4

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is about a star which barely appears in any papers and isn't really notable. Fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NASTRO and WP:GNG. No significant coverage of this object found. Praemonitus (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Erich Kuhnke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. Even the provided sources, which are poor, and lack depth as well as independence, do very little to assert the subject's importance. C 679 11:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Florida. C 679 11:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 11:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Erich Kuhnke is featured in a U.S. Soccer Federation article that outlines his career in soccer, providing significant, non-trivial coverage from an authoritative source. While he did not play for the national team, the article highlights his role in the sport and his influence, particularly as the father of a national team player. The article has already passed the new pages patrol, with reviewer North8000 commenting, "Nice work." Given the existing reliable coverage and editorial approval, this article meets WP:GNG, and I recommend improving it rather than deleting. (talk) 20:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary championships in WWE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another fancraft article just like Secondary championships in All Elite Wrestling. Relevant content exist already on several other articles such as List of former championships in WWE. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Wrestling. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per OP. Information largely repeated from other articles. — Czello ^(music) 10:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BADFORK, similar to the other AfD. --Mann Mann (talk) 16:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Troy Jones

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the first nomination for the kickboxer Troy Jones. The only professional accomplishments listed are Bangla Stadium Champion and WMC Pan American Champion, no notable world championships. I don't see how the subject passes WP:NKICK. He did fight for interim Glory title but lost, I'm not sure what ranked he reach inside the promotion in order to get this, but I'm not convinced he reached top-10 worldwide. Fight announcements and results are not sufficient to meet WP:GNG, I can't find a lot of coverage on him. He is retired, doesn't that he reach the height of the sport. I would like to know what you guys think? Lekkha Moun (talk) 09:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and Illinois. Shellwood (talk) 09:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The first nomination from 2008 appears to have been for an article on a different Troy Jones (a songwriter) than the current article on a kickboxer. (I note this for completeness, I have no opinion at this time.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. This is the first nomination for the kickboxer. But when I used Troy Jones, it led to the first nomination. Perhaps I didn't do it correctly, as it a very peculiar situation. Lekkha Moun (talk) 11:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vattan Sandhu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:SINGER andWP:NACTOR. No coverage in reliable sources. Afstromen (talk) 09:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Music, Asia, India, and Punjab. Afstromen (talk) 09:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indradhanu (TV Channel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient significant coverage, at least in English. One article is not enough. There may be more coverage in Assamese, thus the AfD nomination instead of proposed deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Assam. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 08:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pammi Baweja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable publications. Afstromen (talk) 08:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Asia, and India. Afstromen (talk) 08:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Article clearly fails WP:NBASIC. Chronos.Zx (talk) 15:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Narinder Batth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His work might seem notable, but the lack of coverage in reliable sources indicates that he is not notable Afstromen (talk) 08:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Music, Asia, India, and Punjab. Afstromen (talk) 08:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment; did you look for punjabi language sources? AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 17:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allin Kempthorne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've AFD'd this, but actually I think it should be redirected to Wriggler (video game). There doesn't appear to be any independent, reliable sources giving significant coverage to the subject of this article. Sourcing is all tabloid news (The Mirror, The Sun, Metro) or passing mentions. Simply appearing on BGT (and not being recognised...) does not indicate notability. Simply being a bit-part actor in numerous films does not indicate notability. Additionally I have WP:PROMO/WP:COI concerns here.

They wrote the ZX Spectrum game Wriggler together with their twin when they were at school, and this game is clearly notable, but nothing else they have done appears to be notable.

Also nominating The Vampires of Bloody Island for deletion (no need to redirect this), which is the film Allin Kempthorne created. The only coverage that could be found for this is blatantly promotional ("we were forced to bring forward the release of this film because of an email campaign that no-one but us is the source for existing") and from sources of dubious reliability. Simply being nominated for a Twitter Shorty Award does not indicate notability.

Similarly also Learning Hebrew for the same reasons.FOARP (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Businesspeople, and Video games. FOARP (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Magic, Television, Entertainment, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Mapandan local elections

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No cited sources cover the election at much length, and was not able to find much through searching. Election for small municipality of under 40,000, and relies on social media sources Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and Philippines. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:02, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the page author has placed a comment on this discussion talk page Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 15:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First Bosniak Gymnasium

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AI written article about a secondary school with no indication of notability. A possible ATD is merge to Petrakijina Street. JTtheOG (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. JTtheOG (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sharjah Sustainable City

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no reliably sourced coverage of the subject. None of the sourcing in this article is independent of the UAE government, resulting in a ludicrously credulous and promotional article of this UAE government project. Thenightaway (talk) 05:03, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:30, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Geography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the concerns raised. I am currently improving the article by adding more independent, reliable sources that provide neutral coverage of the subject. Additionally, I am revising the content to ensure a strictly factual and non-promotional tone, in line with Wikipedia's neutrality policy. Given that the project has received coverage in independent media outlets (such as [Shurooq]), I believe the subject meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. I respectfully request additional time to complete these improvements. Below are the links for your reference.

https://shurooq.gov.ae/portfolio/sharjah-sustainable-city

https://www.khaleejtimes.com/business/property/sharjah-sustainable-city-hits-dh2-5-billion-in-sales

https://gulfnews.com/uae/watch-a-sustainable-city-rises-in-sharjah-with-smart-solar-homes-driverless-shuttle-1.86314388

https://www.wam.ae/en/article/dvef0-sharjah-sustainable-city-community-integrating

https://property.constructionweekonline.com/sharjah-sustainable-city-pioneering-eco-friendly-living-and-boosting-uae-real-estate/ 94.203.35.126 (talk) 11:47, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

None of these sources are independent of the subject. Thenightaway (talk) 15:55, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 09:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep unfortunately, the UAE does not have freedom of press, and there are hardly any newspapers, making coverage on topics that would appear to be notable by residents be limited. Gulf News and Khaleej Times are going to be your best bets for coverage on anything. This project is definitely notable regardless of the bias of the sources. Also, the place has won quite a few awards (see the article), which is a sure sign of notability. jolielover♥talk 19:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – As pointed out by the nom, none of the sources are independent from the UAE government. Svartner (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are sources independent of the government, though.
+ many more. Like I said, there are no newspapers in the country 'independent' of the government due to a lack of freedom of press, but there are newspapers & magazines from outside the country covering the place, making the coverage significant & independent. jolielover♥talk 04:07, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:37, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jolielover. multiple external sources have reported on this, the fact that in-country coverage are not by truly independent sources doesnt constitute a problem in my view in this case. We cannot expect the same cultural context in every single country around the world. In the absence of a critical analysis on this however we need to ensure that we are not just parroting press releases. Even though in MDPI, this scientific article also should be considered independent since its peer reviewed by independent reviewers: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8217 --hroest 17:16, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MDPI is a predatory publisher, the authors of the paper are employees of the UAE government, and the journal itself is not considered an academic journal per its Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainability_(journal). The sources that Jolielover listed are just random websites that pop up in a web search. The content in the sources all looks like press releases or paid content. If there is no RS coverage of the subject, then there is nothing that indicates the subject is notable and there is at a more fundamental level nothing to use to write the article. Thenightaway (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warren James Jewellers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be deleted because it lacks independent, reliable sources to establish notability as required by Wikipedia guidelines. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:06, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing found in support of retaining this article here. Ran a WP:BEFORE but hope of finding WP:SIGCOV effectively truncated by the abysmal search result. Patre23 (talk) 13:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

!vote From an initial review, there appears to be a lack of secondary sources. However, the company is - in my view - notable. It is described in 2006 as "the United Kingdom's largest independent jeweller" in a Nominet ruling. It is described as a national jewellery retailer in a more recent 2023 legal judgment. It's last statutory accounts show a revenue of over £100m per year. I will attempt to complete a more thorough review of secondary sources to support notability. Salicia7 (talk) 13:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added the Nominet ruling as a citation, but struggled to find further secondary sources. However, in my view there is adequate references for a stub of this lenght. Salicia7 (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

St. Dalfour France

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks independent, reliable sources to establish notability as required by Wikipedia guidelines. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Xrimonciam (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:55, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question for @Xrimonciam: What WP:BEFORE did you conduct prior to nomination? i know you're a dog 02:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The article has enough independent, reliable sources. A quick web search shows many more. WP:N is covered. -- Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 01:32, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shannon Durig

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to have enough sources with SIGCOV. I found this with sparse coverage, this with moderate coverage, and this. LastJabberwocky (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Theatre, United States of America, and Kansas. LastJabberwocky (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, and Dance. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, there is a ton of coverage in the Kansas City Star, see [36], [37], [38]. I think that's one element of an ideal three to establish GNG. Will see if I can find dig up more. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:22, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The New York Daily News also published a two page spread upon her 1,000th performance. I'm still probably at a Weak delete, but maybe someone else will find a bit more coverage. Maybve there is a world where this could be redirected to the musical's article, but her name isn't really there in any substantial way right now. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:37, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 02:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Identified coverage meets WP:N policy requirements - significant coverage in multiple (two) reliable sources. ~Kvng (talk) 00:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The NYDN is an interview, so we really only have one independent, reliable source so far, imv. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 06:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article lacks sufficient sources, on the other hand, it needs to expand the mentioned page as well.110 and 135 (talk) 06:22, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 06:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can only find trivial mentions of her [39], or [40]. I don't see enough coverage beyond being named in the article. Oaktree b (talk) 13:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Engineering & Science College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a Notable College. Lacks secondary sources. Hardly any online presence of this organization. Fails GNG. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Schools, Engineering, and Nepal. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Innova Champion Discs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a disc golf equipment manufacturer entirely reliant on primary or non-independent sources that doesn't meet WP:NORG or WP:GNG. While they do appear on the surface to be a fairly major supplier of equipment, a search did not reveal any additional sources that would lend notability, with all results limited to either press releases, the organization's corporate website, or listings in shopping sites. The single book referenced in the article only contains passing mentions of the company. nf utvol (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Sports, and California. nf utvol (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination is an excellent example of counterproductive deletionism. Innova is undoubtedly one of the most prominent companies in the sport of disc golf, with numerous references available to support this assertion. You are welcome to mark the article as lacking references, but a deletion request is unwarranted. Iketsi (talk) 04:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In order to support your claims, please provide the references. My WP:BEFORE review didn't turn up anything that would contribute to notability; if it's as prominent and important as you say it is, then I should have been able to find more than press releases, photo credits in a book, and listings on sporting goods sites. nf utvol (talk) 12:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - but add those missing sources, agree with above comments. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 15:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What missing sources? The individual claiming sources didn't provide any references at all. Best I can tell is that there are none. nf utvol (talk) 15:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Qifang

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn long dead business --Altenmann >talk 05:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and China. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The references seem to be adequate, and "long dead" is never a valid reason for deletion. Once notable, always notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 11:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree "long dead" is a non-starter argument. But are the references adequate?
1- an interview with founder
2- an interview with founder
3- an article quoting the COO
4- borderline promotional piece, maybe independent enough but not sure 21innovation.com is an RS
5- company website
Tried to do some searches but came up empty-handed other than this PR piece. Mostly because | this official dominates search results, along with other people having this as a name (e.g., this prof) Oblivy (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TIL an article can stay tagged as a possible BLP violation on zhwiki for 13 years without action. Toadspike [Talk] 23:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete per analysis of Oblivy and per WP:NORG. No real WP:SIGCOV, Interviews and puff pieces dont count towards WP:SIGCOV. --hroest 13:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Domdaniel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage for this fictional place. SL93 (talk) 23:20, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:39, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Doesn't have enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE is hard here, because domdaniel is also a word meaning "a den of inquiry",[41]. There's also a WP:NOTDIC issue here where the article just extracts WP:OR of various times the word has been used. It seems to have been coined in One Thousand and One Nights, so there could be a valid WP:ATD as a search term. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of mythological places as an WP:Alternative to deletion. This is a relevant place in two works of fiction, which is referenced in a number of younger works of fiction as can be seen in the number of primary and secondary sources both present in the article and especially those appearing in the WP:BEFORE search. This role and connectivity in my view goes beyond a dictionary definition, so this should have some place on Wikipedia. Presence in Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase & Fable indicates that as well. There's a rather extensive discussion in this paper on the Thalaba version. Oriental influences in the English Literature of the early nineteenth century, p. 25, discusses the Arabian Nights - Thalaba connection. Britain and the Muslim World, p. 132 has an interesting one-sentence-comparison to Hogwarts. The secondary sources I've seen in a brief search are short on the Domdaniel beyond the specific work of Thalaba, so I don't think a stand-alone article is warranted so far, but deletion would be a loss. Daranios (talk) 07:40, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

....or weak keep concurring with Hannes Röst. At least Babylonian Influence on the Bible and Popular Beliefs has an additional background on etymology beyond what's in the other sources or the Merriam-Webster entry. Daranios (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Daranios (talk) 07:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : The article is severely unsourced, but there are many sources about the subject in Google Books and on the web.

Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 05:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

weak Keep : the problem with subjects like this is that we require reliable secondary sources, not just usage of the term in primary works of fiction/poems/tales. So preferably a (scholarly) discussion about the place, not just evidence that the word is used by someone. I found [42] [43] [44] (probably there are more) on top of the three sources found above which is not as in depth as I would like but at least there are multiple independent secondary sources on this topic which should be enough for a short article. --hroest 13:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Artan Thorja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Only played 60 minutes in Albania's highest league. Nothing significant about the cited coverage, this is also just a WP:PASSING mention, this is WP:ROUTINE. Geschichte (talk) 05:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Albania, and Greece. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mário Gassamá

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe he clearly fails WP:SPORTCRIT, having only played in the semi-amateur Macedonian league as well as scond and fourth tiers in other countries. But does he meet GNG? I believe that he does not. Ref 1 is paywalled, but I don't think it's enough anyway. Refs 2 and 3 are clearly just a few sentences, and ref 4 is a match report, i.e. not specifically about Gassamá. I also found some scant match report-type of coverage in Portuguese. Geschichte (talk) 05:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Portugal. Shellwood (talk) 09:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question i have seen in other afds where people argue that playing in a top flight league in any country has the subject pass the nesccary guidelines and it says in the article that the subject played 16 games for a top flight North Macedonian team though I'm not sure if this argument is vaild so I haven't voted yet Scooby453w (talk)

Level of play is totally irrelevant. Also please sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~). Giant Snowman 18:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Level of play is totally irrelevant." Since when? It's not long ago when it was totally relevant.@GiantSnowman Syvä-äksy (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSPORTS2022. Giant Snowman 18:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akunna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not seeing significant coverage in sources on an internet search. Might also be considered a DAB page with only one article matching the name. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 05:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

redirect. sourced from anonymous website. Weirdly, the website defines it as as female given name, but the only entry is a man :-) (I know, there is a Boy Named Sue, so why not be a boy named Akunna; I am just picking on the quality of sourcing). --Altenmann >talk 05:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Altenmann @JackFromWisconsin The name Akunna is actually commonly regarded to be unisex, and is predominant in the southeastern region of Nigeria. Verifiable sources are here, here, here and here. King ChristLike (talk) 06:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, none of these sources is acceptable for wikipedia. --Altenmann >talk 06:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

R. Arun Kumar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any significant coverage that can satisfy WP:NPOL. The references are about his appointment as a member of a political party. I would be more happy if you provide any in-depth coverage. Bakhtar40 (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, India, and Odisha. Bakhtar40 (talk) 05:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; does not meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG; with the exception of this source, all sources in the article are about the new members of the party being elected, so indepth sources cannot be guaranteed. Nothing other than the sources in the article showed up on Google. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Draftify : This article has more citations than many biography articles in Wikipedia. There are atleast three sources having significant coverage on the subject. (https://www.deshabhimani.com/deshabhimani-english-/cpim-24th-party-congress-54751/new-members-to-cpim-polit-bureau-98849) (https://www.deccanchronicle.com/southern-states/telangana/cpm-elects-arun-kumar-to-politburo-1871349) (https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1AD2Cs3QrY/) More sources can be added with time. So deletion is not the curation option. The article can be draftified if most editors think that this article needs improvement.
XYZ 250706 (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have found three articles written by the subject on NewsClick. (https://www.newsclick.in/author/r-arun-kumar) I think these can be added as his political views. XYZ 250706 (talk) 09:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sofiya Qureshi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable officer, fails GNG (Note: most of the sources from the article are either dead, or made-up links which doesn't exist early but designed in a way to made it notable, kindly cross-check if I'm wrong ). Also, I checked on Google, where sources are available in 2016 when she became first women to head an army contingent, with latest routine sources in 2025. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The article meets both WP:GNG and WP:MILPEOPLE. The subject is the first Indian woman to lead an all-male UN peacekeeping contingent, a role covered in The Times of India^[2], UN News^[3], and Sainik Samachar^[4]. The 2025 events and awards are fictional placeholders for current/future updates and should be trimmed, not deleted entirely. The core notability is verifiable, independently covered, and encyclopedic. Recommend trimming uncited or speculative material and keeping the article. EduExplorer47 (talk) 06:31, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Military. Shellwood (talk) 09:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep: The subject is super notable, so she's clearly passes WP:GNG. News about the subject has been consistently appearing for years, and according to the article, the subject has also won several notable awards. I believe this is sufficient to justify keeping the article on Wikipedia. I had also created a separate article titled Sophia Qureshi, perhaps unintentionally. If any senior editor wishes to merge both articles, they are welcome to do so. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will note that. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 15:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sofiya Qureshi is HIGHLY relevant at the moment for her roles in press conferences. Atharva210 (talk) 14:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chao Khamrop Road

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NROAD or WP:GNG. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 04:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Thailand. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per JackFromWisconsin, both of their points are points where this article fail. Madeline1805 (talk) 04:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, perhaps to Pom Prap, the subdistrict the street is located in. There is in-depth coverage such as the cited Art & Culture article[45] and this short TV documentary[46], but there's only so much that could be said about this minor street, it'd be better off as a mention in a broader article about the wider neighbourhood. --Paul_012 (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hazel Assender

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has no proven notability outside of bios JustMakeTheAccount (talk) 03:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. hroest 04:03, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep tenured professor at Oxford, with an h-index of 30 and 6 publications with 100+ citations, she is close to the bar for WP:NPROF#1 and with some good will passes that bar. --hroest 04:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete per hroest's evidence that she's close to the bar, and the article makes zero claims of notability but instead sounds like trying to pump up the standard sorts of things every prof everywhere does. DMacks (talk) 04:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I feel like she does meet WP:GNG. I won't say that this article is firmly in notable territory, but I wouldn't say this fails GNG either. Madeline1805 (talk) 04:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:Prof. Is the nominator aware of this SNG? Xxanthippe (talk) 06:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Weak keep per WP:PROF#C1. I think someone at this level in the US would very likely be an ASME Fellow and also pass #C3 but I don't see anything like that for her. On the other hand, full professor in England and in particular at Oxford is somewhat stricter than at US universities, maybe not enough for #C5 but a step towards it. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. My first thought was that weak keep was the right choice, but her publication record is reasonable, and, perhaps more important, her publications are well cited, with many cited more than 50 times, several more than 100, and at least two more than 300. Athel cb (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Per the other keep voters I agree that the article has questions when it comes to how necessary the article is but the sources provided does have the article pass gng Scooby453w (talk)
Keep, not only well-cited, but a full professorship in Oxford definitely meets #C5 (older UK universities have few explicitly-named professorships, and we never call ourselves distinguished, it just feels wrong...). Elemimele (talk) 11:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Centrist Party of Canada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fringe political party that fails WP:ORG. I could not find in-depth coverage in reliable sources beyond routine election coverage. This includes candidate naming and reports of vote totals. There is no obvious redirect or merge target either, as nobody in the party leadership has an article or is notable per WP:BIO. Yue🌙 03:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Canada. Yue🌙 03:28, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete 0.0% of the vote is clearly not a major force politically. --hroest 03:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:ORG. Monhiroe (talk) 08:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Entertainment in Uganda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Loose collection of different "entertainment" topics. Doesn't really provide any extra value as a list. (WP:LISTPURP) --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 03:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and Uganda. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ LibStar (talk) 03:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Theodora Children's Charity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability concerns since 2022. Out of the 3 supplied sources, 2 and 3 are not SIGCOV. Need mulitple indepth sources to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Health and fitness, Organizations, and United Kingdom. LibStar (talk) 02:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. After a short search, I found the following sources which help this article meet WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS standards, along with the WP:GNG. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. It's not about the sources in the article, it's about the sources that exist. In the future, please conduct a good WP:BEFORE. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 03:00, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

2019 Racine synagogue vandalism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NEVENT. Coverage is largely WP:ROUTINE, of a legal nature, not analytical, and not sustained. Vandalism is also not a kind of crime that, in most cases, results in notability proving coverage. Merge into The Base (hate group)? PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Judaism, Michigan, and Wisconsin. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think it appears to have some coverage which does not seem routine to me, if this is routine, that is pretty tragic. [Far right network orchestrated synagogue attacks, FBI says][47][48][49] Andre🚐 03:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's crediting that to the FBI, there is no unique analysis in any of those articles, and it's also only two months later, except for routine legal proceedings, WP:PRIMARYNEWS. Antisemitic vandalism is very common. It making the news is also very common. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FBI saying it was orchestrated goes to it not being run-of-the-mill hate vandalism. It also made it into this book and this one. These articles [50], [51] and this [52] show that it kept getting coverage over time for whatever reason. Andre🚐 03:16, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How long is the book coverage, and what is it in the context of? It won't load for me. The forward article is trial stuff and the other two are local. They're sustained though so that's a little better. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Page 314 of Koehler (which is Cambridge University Press) and page 238 of Payne, the former cites the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel from 2020, the latter cites the Justice Department website press release. I cannot see the whole page just a snippet, but I can check to see if those books are kicking around a library or any other way to read them in full to read the surrounding context, but it is enough for me already that for 3-4 years this series of events is being covered somehow. I agree the Forward is a trial article but based on the content of it, plus the linked Ynet article that they cite which is dead for me right now but I will try to track down, I wouldn't call it WP:ROUTINE which if you read is about run-of-the-mill events like scheduled events or usually I think of product announcements. It does not automatically say all trial articles are routine coverage. Standard crime coverage would be routine like maybe something like this: [53] When the FBI is saying it is an orchestrated domestic terrorist group and people are using it as an example of an extremism trend in the US that is very not routine in my view. Andre🚐 03:30, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Trial coverage is almost always... well, maybe routine isn't the right word, but primary? It contains no analysis and is uniformly just repeating the legal arguments. In cases where the trial is analyzed or the crime that is another thing, but that does not seem to be happening here. If you see more of what is in the books ping me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep given these sources. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 04:51, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Discrimination and Terrorism. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Kocho killings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cited entirely to breaking news. I searched, could find no sources that help notability. Does not pass WP:NEVENT. Probably could be merged somewhere. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Iraq. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:11, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment; did you look for any arabic or kurdish language sources? AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 02:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I looked for some variation of Kocho in Arabic plus the date and found nothing that seemed to be about this past the first month. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Round 3 (Elise Estrada album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this article meets WP:GNG. When I tried to look up information about the album or album reviews, I couldn't find any reliable secondary sources. This article also doesn't have any information other than when it was released, by whom, and the track listing. ~AnotherFriendlyHuman (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Toxic encephalopathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very few WP:MEDRS, much of it is uncited, and the NINDS article (https://web.archive.org/web/20050720074428/http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/encephalopathy/encephalopathy.htm) that makes up a lot of the cited material in the article is actually not specific to toxic encephalopathy. I was going to remove all of the material that's cited to NINDS because it may not be accurate to toxic encephalopathy, but at that point it would be leaving the article as mostly uncited or cited to unreliable sources. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 01:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 01:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noël St. John Harnden

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional in tone and a clear WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG fail in my opinion. Aspening (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Visual arts. Aspening (talk) 01:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Cyprus, England, New York, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended reality

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taking to AFD as a courtesy for further consensus. Whether this topic is genuinely distinct from virtual reality, mixed reality, and augmented reality has been disputed by an editor. The editor has attempted to make WP:BOLD mergers of this page into augmented reality, under an argument that the topic of "extended reality" is only synonymous with augmented reality, and that "pages should represent real things, rather than concepts that only exist in academia". ViperSnake151 Talk 01:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ViperSnake151 Talk 01:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear original research. --Altenmann >talk 06:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bravelets

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to be notable upon search. Although they have a considerably large social media following, it does not contribute to notability. No secondary coverage found that would satisfy WP:NORG or WP:GNG. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, United States of America, and Texas. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It appears a decent amount of the coverage that was there in 2016 - including some of the sources I used in the article itself - have disappeared in the last decade. It's a shame I can't see the Austin.com article anymore. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:15, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful as Ever

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Forrest Frank discography. Despite charting, the song is not covered in reliable sources, thus failing WP:NSONG. UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 00:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AIC Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks sufficient independent, reliable sources (e.g., reputable news, academic coverage) to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG, relying on limited promotional material AndesExplorer (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Canada. AndesExplorer (talk) 15:57, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment AndesExplorer: per WP:BEFORE, what is your assessment of the abundant Google Books results for this company? --MarioGom (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Next Sri Lankan presidential election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON, election will probably take place in ~5 years, cannot find anything on the next election specifically. Not a language I speak so if someone who knows much about the language could see what they can find. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 00:16, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Sri Lanka. Shellwood (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete; as you mentioned, there aren't many sources about the election itself as it's just too far away, much WP:CRYSTAL vibes, but let's see what other editors think. Not Wlwtn (talk) 02:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This article was originally titled "2029 Sri Lankan presidential election", but was renamed "Next Sri Lankan presidential election" following a discussion on the article's talk page. I wish to draw attention to the following deletion discussion and the comments made therein, for reference. The same principles apply to this article. Sri Lanka has held regular elections since gaining independence and regular presidential elections since the first in 1982. In this context, the application of WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL is somewhat ambiguous. The current president is eligible to seek a second term and under the Constitution of Sri Lanka, is authorised to call an election after completing four years of his current and first term. Regardless of whether this takes place, the next presidential election must be held no earlier than one month and no later than two months before the expiry of the incumbent's five-year term. At present, this article and several others are maintained as future elections, i.e., Next United Kingdom general election and Next Indian general election. The following categories are maintained for this pupose: Category:Future elections in Asia, Category:Future elections, etc. Therefore, this article should be treated in the same manner. It could be redirected to List of Sri Lankan presidential elections, but it would not be a fair position as references/sources have been provided to support maintaining this article and also provide historical context. QEnigma talk 04:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is very similar to Next Trinidad and Tobago general election, the election is not for another fourish years. There is not a notable reason to include this page this early. It would be like giving the 2038 U.S. election its own page. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 15:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It is standard practice to create articles for next elections as soon as the current election is over, even if the date isn't known e.g. Next United Kingdom general election was created on the day of the 2024 United Kingdom general election and survived an Afd with an avalanche of Keep votes. Obi2canibe (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Delete per WP:TOOSOON, though this could obviously change if the sources are published that solidify notability. Though that will not likely happen for at least several more years, which is also exactly why WP:TOOSOON applies. Agnieszka653 (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, case of WP:TOOSOON. Dan arndt (talk) 02:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I side with the general consensus here. This is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Right now, there aren't sources that make a clear case for notability. When the election receives more coverage, the article could definitely stand. However, as @Agnieszka653 said - this likely won't happen for a while. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - for people voting delete, can you address the points in the AfD linked by QEnigma? Note this statement made there: [Articles for next elections being sent to AfD] has unfortunately happened many times. Every time the result is the same, the vast majority of users calling out whichever user made the nomination for wasting time and the AfD nomination quickly being closed. Stockhausenfan (talk) 07:10, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That would be a case of WP:WAX. Also every time the result is the same - not really; an example. Vestrian24Bio 11:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All the other articles mentioned have a significant number of sources to justify their standing. I'd also like to point out that they are all general election articles, while this is a presidential election. We don't know any of the candidates who will definitely be running, and no candidate has even flirted with the idea of running, everything is just speculation at this point. And before anyone goes, "what about 2028 United States presidential election?" Even the US election has the sources to support its existence, as there is already a considerable number of candidates who have expressed interest in running and several WP:RS to back this up. If a candidate suddenly declares interest in running then the article can be kept but for now; TL:DR, Sri Lanka is no US or UK. Not Wlwtn (talk) 14:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete: Not much coverage in sources; could be created after 2028 maybe. Vestrian24Bio 11:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Magda Castillo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. All the sources provided are databases/results listings. Nothing in depth to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. I don't believe her medal in the Central American Games is enough to satisfy WP:NATH. LibStar (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Sport of athletics, and Honduras. LibStar (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the Central American Games marathon medal satisfies WP:NATH prong 1, "Finished top 8 in a competition at the highest level outside of the Olympic Games and world championships". There's no doubt that there's more coverage in Honduran media, which is sadly notoriously difficult to access per List of newspapers in Honduras#Newspapers:

El Caribe: No archives before 2011
Honduras This Week: Website not functional
El Periódico (Honduras): No archives before 2016
La Prensa (Honduras): Website not easily navigable but does not seem to have articles from before the mid-2000s
El Tiempo (Honduras): Does not seem to archive news before 2023
La Tribuna (Honduras): Website not easily navigable but does not seem to have articles from before the mid-2000s

Do you see the issue here? Notability is always determined by the existence of coverage, not its presence in the article. --Habst (talk) 02:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. This person won a medal at the Central American Games, and according to WP:SPORTSCRIT sigcov may exist. As stated by Habst, it is difficult to find sources, but based on their reasoning and my own research, I am voting weak keep. Weak bc we haven't found good sigcov yet, but it probably exists. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 02:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"according to WP:SPORTSCRIT sigcov may exist" - what do you mean by that? Geschichte (talk) 05:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, SPORTSCRIT requires sigcov to exist, not the other way around. LibStar (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Geschichte, I think the user meant "according to WP:NSPORTS" (many people confuse NSPORTS and SPORTCRIT), which says that SIGCOV is likely to exist for subjects meeting NATH. --Habst (talk) 12:16, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Another preposterous statement by the user Habst, who regrettably shows a severe lack of competence in the subject, in claiming that the Central American Games (not to be confused with the larger Central American and Caribbean Games) belongs to the "highest level outside of the Olympic Games and world championships". I am actually ashamed by the audacity displayed in making such an outlandish claim. Geschichte (talk) 05:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte, are you in a position to !vote on this AfD, since you have reviewed the AfD and article? LibStar (talk) 06:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Geschichte, I think that contributions are more important than personal statements so I appreciate your contributions even when we disagree. Even if you think that prong 1 doesn't apply, then surely NATH prong 2 "Finished top 3 in any other major senior-level international competition (this includes prestigious small field meets, e.g., IAAF Diamond League/IAAF Golden League meets, less-prestigious large-scale meets, e.g., Asian Games, and any IAAF Gold Label Road Race that is not explicitly mentioned above)" would? Generally, it's been understood to include most international medals as tracked by athleticspodium.com which the Central American Games are. --Habst (talk) 12:13, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment These athletics AFDs are becoming such a personal issue between two editors that surely it is time for some sort of mediation to take place. It is the same arguments over and over again. One editor appears determined to delete as many athletics bio stubs as they can and the other is equally determined to save every bio by claiming coverage must exist somewhere from sometime in some publication that may be in an archive somewhere but none of which can be proved. This all seems way out of line with the Wikipedia mission statement. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Habst. Gamaliel (talk) 23:05, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PERX, no argument presented for keeping. LibStar (talk) 23:34, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FSU Homecoming Live

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic is an annual university event that does not appear notable. Popular artists have performed at the event but the event doesn't inherit any notability from that. After searching I can only find local and self-published sources. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 16:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 16:36, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 May 8. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article has no sources other than this event's official site, and most of what I can find in terms of sources comes from the university's website, so the article appears to fail notability due to a lack of significant coverage in independent sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Lufkin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet NACADEMIC or NAUTHOR. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and United States of America. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:HEY the article just got accepted from afc a week and a half ago Scooby453w (talk) 00:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AFC is not a notability guarantee. It means the accepter thinks the article has a 50% chance. Also that isn't what WP:HEY is for. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scooby453w, please explain how this would meet the Heyman Standard if there have not been any improvements to the article since it was nominated for deletion? Thank you. Netherzone (talk) 00:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep where was the WP:BEFORE ? he is a full prof at a R1 University, he has a substantial number of high impact publications with 100+ citations (I count 21) which is usually passing the bar for a research-only professor, even more so for a physician-scientist. On top he has invented a useful tool (the needle). --hroest 01:20, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They're all multi-author publications, no? And WP:NACADEMIC says distinguished professor, not every professor. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:26, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
he passes WP:NPROF#1 without much question, most contemporary research is multi-author and this is not exception. A subject only has to pass one of the 8 criteria, not all of them (are you referring to NPROF#5 with your comment?). --hroest 03:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Criteria 1 says As demonstrated by independent reliable sources. Can you point to any? (and yes). PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:14, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@PARAKANYAA: I have no particular opinion on Lufkin, but in the case of academics, publications in peer-reviewed journals are in themselves regarded as independent reliable sources because the peer reviewers are independent of the author. The citation count is an indicator that the research has made significant impact. Almost all scientific papers are multi-author, and Lufkin's place as last author on some of these indicates that he was the senior academic running the project (except in those disciplines that use alphabetical order, first and last authors are the priority spots, corresponding to the one who did the work, and the one who conceived, planned and scientifically-directed the work). Elemimele (talk) 11:45, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning weak keep It does seem to be over the line of notability on the strength of his book e.g. [54], plus this [55], would seem to be >1 event, a pass on GNG even without considering in-depth the academic publications such as [56] and whether his standing is significant in his field. Assuming he is RB Lufkin, he has quite a lot of Google Scholar hits.Andre🚐 02:48, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think we can include the information in the second source because he is a BLP. The first one is an interview. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He would be a PUBLICFIGURE on the basis of his notability if we are saying he is a notable public intellectual and for purposes of his career. I agree the first one is an interview slash promotion for his book, but it's good enough for me when taken as a whole with everything else. There is an essay WP:INTERVIEW and I agree this one is a little on the fluffy side, but he has a bestselling book. I also did find at least one mention of the "Lufkin needle" he is credited with inventing. [57] Andre🚐 03:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, California, Rhode Island, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Effects of Climate Change on Homeless Populations in Omaha, NE

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Far too narrow of a topic to make sense as its own article. I previously moved it to draft space but the creator moved it back to article space. Jay8g [V•T•E] 04:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Environment, Social science, and Nebraska. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Written like a college paper and far too specific to be kept. Esolo5002 (talk) 05:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This clearly fails WP:NOTESSAY and its topic is too specific. MidnightMayhem 05:54, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly an essay topic rather than an encyclopedia page. The sourcing is very generic and doesn't mention this extremely specific topic. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above Sanemero the Robot Prince (not really, it's a Gloryhammer reference) 14:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article documents the intersection of two widely recognized public concerns—climate change and homelessness—through a local lens, using Omaha as a case study. While the geographic scope is specific, the content addresses a generalizable, nationally relevant issue supported by peer-reviewed literature, government data, and national media. This aligns with the case-study approach permitted under Wikipedia's content guidelines.

The article draws on over 70 references, including sources from the CDC, NOAA, Georgetown Environmental Law Review, NASA, UNL, and the U.S. Global Change Research Program. It references federal datasets showing Omaha has one of the fastest-rising rates of unsheltered homelessness among U.S. metro areas (see HUD/FWFP citation), while also experiencing documented climate stressors like the 2019 and 2024 Missouri River floods and record-breaking heatwaves.

Concerns about tone or structure are editorial in nature and do not warrant deletion under WP:ATD. The article is not promotional, speculative, or poorly sourced. If needed, I would support a merge into a broader topic such as Climate change and homelessness in the United States, but deletion would erase well-sourced content on a topic underserved in Wikipedia's current climate coverage. DairyEnjoyer (talk) 16:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

^ Cerone, Antonio; Autili, Marco; Bucaioni, Alessio; Gomes, Cláudio; Graziani, Pierluigi; Palmieri, Maurizio; Temperini, Marco; Venture, Gentiane (2022-09-24). Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2021 Collocated Workshops: CIFMA, CoSim-CPS, OpenCERT, ASYDE, Virtual Event, December 6–10, 2021, Revised Selected Papers. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-031-12429-7.
^ "In a first, woman officer to lead Indian Army contingent at UN mission". 25 Feb 2016.
^ "Female commanders changing the face of UN peacekeeping". 10 Nov 2017.
^ "Col. Sofiya Qureshi: Breaking the glass ceiling in the Indian Army". 1 Jul 2016.

[nushell-1] Cerone, Antonio; Autili, Marco; Bucaioni, Alessio; Gomes, Cláudio; Graziani, Pierluigi; Palmieri, Maurizio; Temperini, Marco; Venture, Gentiane (2022-09-24). Software Engineering and Formal Methods. SEFM 2021 Collocated Workshops: CIFMA, CoSim-CPS, OpenCERT, ASYDE, Virtual Event, December 6–10, 2021, Revised Selected Papers. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-031-12429-7.

[2] "In a first, woman officer to lead Indian Army contingent at UN mission". 25 Feb 2016.

[3] "Female commanders changing the face of UN peacekeeping". 10 Nov 2017.

[4] "Col. Sofiya Qureshi: Breaking the glass ceiling in the Indian Army". 1 Jul 2016.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]