Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- Cartvoz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 132 five times in the last 5 minutes (Removal of all categories, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Nttgip1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Himariote dialect was changed by Nttgip1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908042 on 2025-11-09T19:41:36+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Declined. Not obvious vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32416-74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1308 (LTA 1308, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:27, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Missmoonchild9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:24, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32413-41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1360 (LTA 1360, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32469-57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- SouthAfrica993 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32231-75 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- SebastianMickler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32444-29 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Youmadthatilovekanye (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32468-80 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32525-52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32352-32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32483-23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- ~2025-32469-57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Appears to be sockpuppetry/block evasion- see ~2025-31499-49 and ~2025-31513-98 also recently at Young Justice (TV series). Magitroopa (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Also see [1] versus [2]. Appears to be more via Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Son of Zorn. Magitroopa (talk) 01:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Tommym232323 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Gas lighting: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Vandalism. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32394-76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – block evasion by User:Jinnifer. Untamed1910 (talk) 01:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1010:B180:0:0:0:0:0/42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) - Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs and temp accounts, dating back at least to September. (See both the temp account edits and the Legacy IP edits.) The vast majority of edits since then are vandalism, and there's also more disruption that dates back at least to March. Almost every recent edit has been pure vandalism. Requesting a rangeblock for at least 3-6 months. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- NashvilleX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Iiii I I I (talk) 03:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32472-98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. See the first diff for why I'm reporting with 2 edits. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 04:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Special:Diff/1321371329 --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 04:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- SAGARIA13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) repeated violation of WP:LIVESCORES, did this after being warned not to. The match was not finished until eight minutes later. Ikhouvanjou14 (talk) 04:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikhouvanjou14. Please stop reporting people for LIVESCORES violations. That is a section of a style guide about one sport (not even the sport in question here); it is not a user-conduct policy, and definitely not something that, if violated, constitutes vandalism. In this case, there is no reason to think that the user was even aware of that obscure and somewhat counter-intuitive style guideline until you alerted them to it, four minutes before reporting them here. If they do persist in violating it (or, violating its spirit, since again it doesn't explicitly apply outside snooker), the correct venue is WP:ANI, as you were told the last time you reported someone for this. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 04:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32532-58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Plasticwonder (talk) 04:21, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 05:43, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Cây Thập Ác (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Block evasion (likely sock ChanComThemPho). XReport --Hiyuune (talk) 04:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- ~2025-32525-52 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. See filter log. General Ization Talk 04:35, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- JackFrostHeeTheBombermanFan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- 12MUFC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Aeiaeikamala (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Theofficialalex43 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- 1a2b3c4d5e6f7g8h9i10j11k12l (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Eshitajangra (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "shit" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Street Knowledge Staggers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:Diff/1321380623. Nil🥝 05:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Apparently it's a stage name or personal username, and "Staggers" is the surname according to that diff. Report at WP:AIV if promotional edits continue. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Suniway (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). See their sandbox page. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs persistently removing sourced content. Danners430 tweaks made 19:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:49, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruption was a day ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of original research, written in unencyclopedic tone, by various anon accounts (probably the same person). Iiii I I I (talk) 01:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: SerpentorC (talk · contribs) blocked by GorillaWarfare. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The article covers a highly controversial and politically sensitive topic. It is likely to attract ragebait or nationalistic vandalism as the election approaches. Requesting Semi protection for a period of six months. Raihanur (talk) 11:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Question: @Raihanur: Is there actual disruption underway? Because pages are not protected preemptively. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Per above. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recurrent IP vandalism, seemingly a string of sockpuppets likely from the same user. AmityCity (talk) 12:22, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Preferably, indefinite semi-protection. Vandalism has been going on for years; however, since it's mostly occurring from IPs and could stand to be open to improvement from a wide range of users in other regards, hopefully it doesn't need a higher level of protection. AmityCity (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. RunningOnBrains(talk) 03:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This biography of a living person has been subject to persistent vandalism, unsourced additions, and biased edits, often from unregistered or newly created accounts. These repeated disruptions compromise the article’s neutrality and accuracy, especially regarding sensitive political and biographical details. Semi-protection is requested to ensure content stability and compliance with Wikipedia’s biographies of living persons (BLP) ~2025-32434-15 (talk) 17:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Maybe two instances of disruption in the last couple of weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Can you please consider protecting this page? Previously, several sockfarms have attempted to remove controversy-related information from this page, and a disclosed paid editor posted on the talk page. I wouldn't be surprised if the latest removal was done by editors with COI.
I decided not to restore the information yet. I have asked for feedback at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Husain Al-Musallam.
I would appreciate your comment. Please ping me on reply. Thanks. Janhrach (talk) 20:15, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk. Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal. — TAnthonyTalk 21:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop image vandalism from all over the world. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 22:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Frequent vandalism by newly made accounts with no other edits. — Rtrb (talk) 23:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- +1. LTA made these accounts, it seems. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 23:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. for one day. Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A number of IPs (what do we call them now, unregistered users?) have been edit warring over the picture used in the lead, against consensus on the talk page. See Talk:Sanae Takaichi#Lead image, some have been adding AI-modified images. I would appreciate if semi protection could be enacted so that we can have stability and encourage talk page participation. Yours, &c. RGloucester — ☎ 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise since at least September 29 NJZombie (talk) 02:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:17, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:17, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: LTA User:Jinnifer has been attempting to use sock accounts to add categories to various films in the Friday the 13th franchise, including this one since at least September 29. NJZombie (talk) 02:17, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: was semi-protected on November 7th. expired a few hours ago, multiple accounts have vandalized it since. IsCat (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruption and sockpuppetry at GA article since mid-October. Multiple confirmed socks (the Widarlan+ accounts) followed by obvious block evade socks in last few days: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. R Prazeres (talk) 03:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:10, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. RunningOnBrains(talk) 04:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Back and forth editing amongst temp-accounts in the last few days regarding WP:PIA / the use of the words "Gaza genocide". Nil🥝 04:39, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption is PIA-related, but the vast majority of the article is not. Applying temporary semiprotection. If it escalates, please re-report. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and malicious editing to leave out factual content verified by independent media. Samsaib (talk) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The Bushranger One ping only 06:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism and malicious editing to leave out factual content verified by independent media. Samsaib (talk) 05:07, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. The Bushranger One ping only 06:12, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because l will protect this page TFFA-4460 (talk) 06:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Paul Bondeson not Pete Bondeson ~2025-32054-74 (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Question: Which page are you requesting to edit? 1962 Doral Open does not exist. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 8 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC) |
| 54 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Hello! I formally request the autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in English and Spanish, and I consider that, after so many years and hundreds of articles created on both wikis, i am in the position to say that I know the rules and styles. I've never cared much about user rights, but now that I've started a personal project (ambassadors of Spain and all its lists) to expand diplomatic information about my country, Spain, I'd like to avoid the workload that comes with reviewing articles that comply with our rules. Thank you. TheRichic
Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies. Λeternus (talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Have been creating several new articles recently, and I understand the policies and guidelines behind articles. BenTanXiaoMing (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I was granted a temporary autopatrolled rights which is going to be expired on 15 November. I didn't create any articles within this period but improve some articles and plan to create or expand more. I request to make it permanent, If I meet the criteria. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 11:06, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
|
.svg?lang=en){kind=small}
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Hello, I request AutoWikiBrowser rights to generally help apply consistent templates and make efficient edits across many pages. I saw it on WP:JWB. Thank you. Bagwe Neza (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Currently working on CheckWiki edits and would like to try out this tool as it's one of the recommended tools to use. Ecourter (talk) 06:42, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Attempting to fix a page tagged as orphaned by adding links, including one on Amelia Earhart's page (semi-protected), Listing Captain Linda Pauwels (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linda_Pauwels) as an author who published eight previously unpublished poems by Earhart in her book of aviation themed haiku. PhillipFrye (talk) 00:32, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
I would like confirmed rights so I can create and edit articles more easily. I’m an active editor working mainly on Indian film topics Wiki Journalist of Indian (talk) 03:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Alternate account of HwyNerd Mike, mainly using for testing JS scripts. HwyNerd Mike (alt) (talk) 05:44, 10 November 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator
Hi, I have a deep passion for helping others and a like to help communities like Wikipedia, (previously moderated on twitch and mad multiple discord places and instances). this role would help me help others out and give active help to others in the community. if this is the wrong place/ wrong permissions to be requesting could someone guide me to the correct one (there is alot of pages for permissions) JG qwerty (talk) 00:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC) JG qwerty (talk) 00:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
I teach fairly regularly with Wikipedia in a university in the UK. I have run a few outreach programmes with students over the past few years, training up new editors, and hope to do more in future. You can see the dashboard stats here. https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/users/Charleslincolnshire It'd be useful to be able to be able to confirm users, since this is occasionally a nuisance. Charleslincolnshire (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I'm not hunting for the New Page Reviewer right, but I'm confident that if or when I have it, I'll make a real difference in helping reduce the huge New Pages backlog... I’m a fast learner and actively participate in multiple (multitask) areas of maintenance work. Most of my contributions focus on anti-vandalism, using AutoWikiBrowser (AWB) for cleanup, adding or removing maintenance tags, copyediting, correcting categories & fixing bare URLs. I have also participated in Good Article reviews, WP:AfD discussions and the New Pages Feed. Am familiar with our core content policies especially verifiability WP:V, No Original Research WP:NOR, Neutral Point of View WP:NPOV, reliable sourcing WP:RS, Biographies of Living Persons WP:BLP, notability WP:N and What Wikipedia Is Not WP:NOT and am confident applying them when reviewing pages. My goal as a New Page Reviewer is to help reduce the backlog while ensuring that new articles meet Wikipedia's standards for quality and notability and also to support good-faith new editors along the way. Thank you in advance. ThilioR O B O T🤖 talk 06:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
I would like to renew my expired one month trial run. I still believe I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines and a good record. SpragueThomsontalk 17:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
I would like to have NPP rights mostly to patrol redirects. As background, I have written a number of articles and also created a number of redirects. I would mostly use this to patrol redirects. I am fairly active at WP:RfD. I am rarely active at AfD and would not use this to patrol articles unless they are fairly obvious as to what to do with them (bright-line either passes or fails), just to reduce the backlog. Casablanca 🪨(T) 02:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
I want to help reduce the New Pages Feed backlog as a new page reviewer and will not review my own articles. My contributions and interests (mainly related to Japanese religions) are very similar to those of @Komitsuki: who also recently applied here last week; I have helped fix his some of articles and many other articles to fit WP:MOS guidelines. I'm a native English speaker who also knows Japanese and am very detail-oriented. I will be happy with a trial period and will try to get more AfD experience. Also, I understand this is a learning process that I am happy to carefully participate in. Thank you for considering my request. Yenistardom (talk) 19:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
I work on improving new pages by adding categories, short descriptions, and making small fixes wherever needed. I’d like to take a more active role in reviewing new pages to ensure quality and help clear the backlog. I’m familiar with basic notability, sourcing, and deletion guidelines. Kirokeer (talk) 17:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
I've had probationary patroller rights for a month now and I've been enjoying helping with the NPP backlog and participating in AfC. I'd like to request my patroller right be extended. Thanks! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
I routinely evaluate new articles for policy compliance and have participated in deletion-related processes. I am familiar with WP:GNG, WP:V, and deletion policies. I want to contribute by reviewing new articles, removing problematic content, and assisting new users in improving their pages. Morekar (talk) 13:55, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
I am interested in being granted the new page reviewer right. I have an extensive history of editing on Wikipedia, having created over two dozen well-sourced articles on a variety of topics, as well as expanding and improving stubs and starts to C class at least. I also regularly review citations to verify them when it seems appropriate, including recently acquiring an EPUB edition of a book for one article. I have come upon a few articles recently that havent been reviewed yet, and it would be useful to help get those squared away. I frequently work with other editors to develop a consensus where everyone is satisfied, particularly but not only in contentious areas. And I enjoy helping to guide newer users on how to construct a good quality article. I am also deeply anti-LLM so I will be on the lookout for such junk. With this right, I would continue to verify and improve citations, etc. Sadly, there is a seemingly limitless supply of poorly cited legacy and newer articles. ← Metallurgist (talk) 22:40, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
I've been patrolling recent changes for quite a while, and I have familiarity with the AfD and speedy deletion process, having speedy deleted a couple of pages. I'd like NPP rights so I can reduce the current ever-increasing new page backlog. Thanks in advance. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Given the articles I have created/contributed to on Wikipedia, I would like to have access to review new articles, and believe I could contribute to expanding the new articles, finding citations, fixing tone, etc. KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I am a retired person and I enjoy my time editing on Wikipedia and I like to be a reviewer of new page to contribute more. GreenRedFlag (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to review new pages. The backlog is too damn long! – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 02:55, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing for quite a while now, and I have also worked on many new articles, including Stubs. I was recently also granted the right to review pending changes. I would like to receive this right because I work in this area and would also really want to help reduce the backlog. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 03:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello I would like to become a new page reviewer even though i don't meet the requirements. The thing is there is a huge amount of articles that need reviewing. Whether I get this I don't not know, if I do I would help trim the backlog down by around 70 article's or more. Theknoledgeableperson (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I'd like reviewer rights so I can help with pending changes and speed up the review process. Inu06 (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
I have been reverting spam and vandalism on Special:RecentChanges, and I'd like pending changes reviewer to review pending edits as they show up there. Yerlo (talk) 14:53, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
I've been editing Wikipedia for about 7 months now, and made just under 500 edits. While sometimes I make mistakes, I learn from them and try to be as understanding as possible. I've merged one article, and recently split several. I think this permission would help me improve Wikipedia,and help take some pressure of other reviewers. Tactical Falcon (talk) 22:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
I already make a habit of keeping an eye on Special:PendingChanges when I'm spending time on Wikipedia, and it would be great to be able to accept edits that meet the requirements rather than just reverting those that don't, especially when the backlog fills up with acceptable edits waiting for a reviewer. If I could do with any constructive criticism, please let me know. Seercat3160 (talk) 10:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights I have been on here for six months now, and recently also joined the simple Wikipedia. Have had 2 declined rollback requests in July and August but have since then, I now officially fully understand the basics of Wikipedia and how to edit, only issue I have had with my editing lately was an accidental page blanking I did due to page-move vandalism and failed move-back about a month ago, but have 2000 additional edits since then (4,100 total). I recently came across one article I was editing (Seth Curry) where the issue of not being a PC-reviewer took full effect, so I am requesting to be a PC reviewer, especially as some "Likely Have Problems" pending edits I have seen in the recent changes have actually been good. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 04:20, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
I have made over 500 edits and currently hold the extended confirmed user status. I would like to help reduce the backlog by reviewing pending changes. Thank you. BrownCanary61 (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
I have patrolled hundreds of edits for vandalism via recent changes, I am well-versed in what is vandalism and what isn't (among other reasons to deny a pending change). And would like to help with pending changes reviewing. CocaPopsRather 19:09, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
wikignome ready to do a little bit more Jaufrec (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
I'd like pending changes reviewer rights so I can do something else other than just recent changes patrolling. I have over 3,000 edits as of this comment, and while I have only been in the community for 2 months, I'm more than familiar with the relevant policies. Cheers! monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 16:19, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing on Wikipedia for quite a while now. I have nearly a 1000 edits on the English Wikipedia and 1500+ sitewide edits. I think recieving this right will help me improve Wikipedia since many articles that i regularly edit are protected. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 23:12, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
I would like to become a pending changes reviewer to help make the process of reviewing pending changes as quick as possible. I believe I meet the requirements for the permission as I have been editing on Wikipedia since 2023,
I occasionally see pending changes when looking at Recent changes for vandalism and it would be nice to be able to review them. Kspiers (talk) 02:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
I spend a lot of time on recent changes and was recently granted rollback. I'm familiar with content policies and guidelines, including the criteria for accepting a pending revision. I'd like to help by accepting good pending changes when I see them while patrolling, and by actively going through pending changes if there's ever a backlog. lp0 on fire () 18:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I believe that this tool will allow me to find and revert vandalism quicker. Assadzadeh (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Had requested a while back, but was told I needed some more experience. I believe since then I have obtained a better understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines, and this permission would be useful for me as I could use tools such as antivandal etc. I am aware of all guidelines and always warn users with reverts. I have made 4 pages (which have been accepted) and I am also a pending changes reviewer and temporary account viewer and my edit history hopefully shows how I have put them to good use, for example sock puppet investigations I have started by utilising these tools. Pr0m37h3u$ 15:34, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
I have been active in AV'ing for around 2 months now. I've gained experience about guidelines, know what is and what isn't vandalism, when to revert, and when not to. I am requesting Rollback to use other tools like Huggle to make RC patrolling easier. Thanks for considering.
I have been reverting vandalism edits and monitoring recent changes via redwarn patrol for quite a while now. I have a track record of notifying editors when i revert their edits. Rollback rights would help me to do counter-vandalism tasks more efficiently. Scoria (talk) 03:08, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
I've been getting back into gnoming, and doing some recent changes patrol. I wanted to try out SWViewer, so I would like to have rollback, at least temporarily, to try the tool. I'm already an AFC reviewer, NPR and have PCR and TAIV. I already use rollback with Twinkle, so it's nothing new to me, and I have read the policies. IAmChaos 02:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
I do A LOT of AV work and would like the right for reverting Vandalism. Tankishguy 20:49, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
Anti-vandalism. Being able to report to AIV whether it's a single IP address or an entire range (due to DHCP address assignment) is useful. As for the requirements for this permission, I've had an account since 2008, making over 12K edits. Most of them cleanup. Tarl N. (discuss) 07:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Patrolling recent changes and countering vandalism are a big part of what I have been doing for years. Unfortunately, the temporary account system, while understandable, has made the task harder than it needs to be. M.Bitton (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC) M.Bitton (talk) 17:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
I'm active, always patrolling recent changes, reverting vandalism, and reporting sockpuppets. This permission would make it much easier. I've read the restrictions at WP:TAIVDISCLOSE. Skitash (talk) 20:20, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Deal with a lot of sockpuppets on various articles. For example, some funky stuff going on on Elections in South Korea rn. I've read the requirements grapesurgeon (talk) 21:25, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
I have an extensive history of recent change patrolling. Viewing IP addresses associated with temporary users is beneficial when analyzing multiple similar changes to a page in rapid succession. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 16:33, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
I am involved in counter-vandalism efforts, and would like the permission to analyze unconstructive edits from temporary-account editors. I have read and agree to the relevant policies. Best, Staraction (talk | contribs) 17:33, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Patrolling cross-wiki abuse and agree to follow WMF policy. The rights will help me identify IP socks. 🅷🅴🅽🆁🅸 (Let's talk) ✉ 18:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
I've been around a while, and a lot of my work on the project involves reverting vandalism and abuse. I have read the policy document and understand the restrictions around disclosure of information derived from the tool. — Manticore 21:10, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
I already have rollback and PCR rights, so this would be a natural extension for my anti-vandalism work. I have experience with both the past and present systems, and I have read, understood, and agreed to the provisions of the requirements and responsibilities of this right. I have moderate to advanced experience with RCP and NPP in the userspace. Thanks, 2003 LN6 21:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
I very often use IP location to track complex vandalism. I agree to the terms of use for this tool. Hardyplants (talk) 08:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
going into copyediting, also still do AV work, per asilvering's request. Tankishguy 21:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
I'm active in recent changes patrolling, and TAIV would make it much easier to see and properly handle vandalism, sockpuppetry and other disruption on the same/similar pages across the same IP range (particularly /64 v6 ranges), where there is no correlation between temporary accounts. I have read and agree to the requirements at WP:TAIVDISCLOSE. - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 03:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC) |