User:Phantomsteve/Admin-stuff
This is a page with links to my actions as an administrator. It also has links which I will find useful in my role as an admin.
If you feel that an action that I have performed was wrong, please let me know on my User talk:Phantomsteve - I know that I will sometimes get it wrong, and if so I will remedy the situation!
My admin actions
- Pages I have deleted
- Users or IPs which I have blocked or unblocked
- Pages which I have protected or unprotected
- Users for whom I have granted/removed accountcreator or rollback permissions
Useful links
People I have nominated for adminship:
| User | RfA Started | Result | Support | Oppose | Neutral | %Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamesofur | 15 April 2010 | Successful | 84 | 18 | 7 | 82% |
| AlexandrDmitri | 13 May 2010 | Successful | 99 | 9 | 2 | 92% |
| Bsadowski1 | 21 July 2010 | Successful | 75 | 29 | 8 | 72% |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Srborn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Jake Wood Olympia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On IFBB Hall of Fame (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account; account is being used only for promotional purposes. Clearly WP:NOTHERE. Faster than Thunder (talk | contributions) Tamil speakers: Contribute here 00:33, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thatguatemalan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Their talk page is filled with warnings about vandalism. Most recently, they've put "imagine losing" on a war page. Wowzers122 (talk) 01:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- 187.147.165.197 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Hey Baby (No Doubt song): vandalism after recent release of block. Ban evasion by User:Andrewbf from Mexico. Binksternet (talk) 03:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- 47.189.174.120 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after recent release of block. See also filter log. Annh07 (talk) 03:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Subir Noobra (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Zarana Mehta (Indian Architectural Designer ) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- PaulaSlierOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- RoyalFamilyFanUK (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- SilverQOfficials (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 20:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Azurealliance (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- YOLO 2pacapocolypse (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "yolo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Although this string is not a username violation in and of itself, it may indicate disruptive editing. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- ManjitBlogger (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- YourMOMMMMMMM10 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Honestlyheaskedtochangeit73737474 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Nakshpurohitpredestinarianism (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mynameisbobintheanimalworld (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Boom Raveewit Jirapongkanon (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Username represents a well-known person. Paul_012 (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Stage names are also acceptable. Paul 012, is there anything in their edits that leads you to believe that they are not the person in question? Cullen328 (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- It is a very common pattern with fans trying to write Wikipedia articles about their favourite actors to use some variant of the actor's name, or sometimes the name itself, as their username. See this report for example. Also, this name format (nick name + given name + surname) is not how one would refer to oneself, though it is commonly used by the entertainment media when referring to actors. The contribution pattern is entirely consistent with this being a fan account. (Also, FYI, a ping won't work if you add it into an existing signed comment in a separate edit.) --Paul_012 (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Therapingleonidas (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Very offensive because it has raping in the name. Easternsahara (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Easternsahara They haven't edited for 20 years! Also, "rape" has a variety of meanings. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:15, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Muslimsamerica (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Using userspace as a promotion and username itself is also promotional. Easternsahara (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Easternsahara, all these accounts appear to be stale and have not been used in the last 2-3 weeks. I'm not an admin but I just thought I'd just give you a heads up that we don't need to report accounts that haven't been used in the last 2-3 weeks. --- TLJ7863 (talk) 21:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. Last edit 2009! — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- IHateNickers (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Racial slur means it is an egregious violation. Easternsahara (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Koolkidsklub09258 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – References hate group. Easternsahara (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- KoolKidsKluber (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – References hate group. Easternsahara (talk) 20:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- FortyGuard (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 22:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent editors failing to adhere to WP:NPOV with ill-intent directed towards painting the subject in an unflattering way. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 01:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Medium level of IP disruption PawPatroler (talk) 05:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism of unsourced information edit by IP users. Panda Arun (talk) 07:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated COI / paid-for editing by employee of the museum that is the subject of the article. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: vandalism and biased editing due to his recent role in the Karen Read trial. Mikiko609 (talk) 15:02, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IPs edit warring over whether or not to include an opinion piece. Simonm223 (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Skitash (talk) 17:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Arbitration enforcement GiraffeLover19 (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing - changes to former band member without a source. HorrorLover555 (talk) 19:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 23.123.173.233 (talk · contribs) (from The Cab). by User:Asilvering with reference to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brettandelle. DMacks (talk) 02:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to repeated vandalism and unsourced or defamatory edits from anonymous IP addresses. Examples include: - June 5, 2024: IP 138.4.130.137 added slanderous material labeled “controversy” - January 2023: IP 2600:1011:b068:5d37:795b:e01d:2956:3c7a made similar edits, repeatedly reverted - Edits have violated BLP (Biographies of Living Persons) policy Semi-protection would help maintain neutrality and article integrity. Emfrie (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Medium level of IP disruption PawPatroler (talk) 22:05, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 02:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Upgrade to extended-confirmed protection until July 6th, when leaked trade to the Phoenix Suns can be confirmed official or not. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Seems to attract lots of IP addresses and new users adding purely promotional content. Not frequent changes, but this has been happening since at least 2020. SergioFLS (talk) 01:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Long-term extended-confirmed protection - the article was repeatedly recreated by several sockpuppets of StayCalmOnTress. (Humraaz (TV series) was ec-protected due to that reason) ~SG5536B 02:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC) (updated at 02:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC))
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – content dispute / edit warring from multiple IP editors. Magic Fizz (talk) 03:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Unprotection: Protection no longer needed after 16 years, which was semi-protected back in 2009. Absolutiva (talk) 10:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin @Future Perfect at Sunrise. Entranced98 (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Noting that the article falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Balkans or Eastern Europe.-- Ponyobons mots 16:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 12 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Is there any reason why the average editor would need to edit this? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Presumably the IP intends to nominate this and the below for deletion based on their other edits. But that doesn't require an unprotection; they can just request that the TfD tag be added using {{edit template-protected}}. However, what makes you think
Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}
? Do you have any actual evidence of this, or are you just guessing? * Pppery * it has begun... 05:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Only 7 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{school block}} 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This article about this fondly remembered British children's animated series has been semi-protected for ten years, with little vandalism. Frankster04 (talk) 18:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) To this day the article's subject is plagued by rumours about character names being sexual innuendos, which appear to have inspired the vandalism that warranted the protection. Furthermore, there are a lot of vandalism edits made between May 2012 and February 2015 that look similar enough to be a possible case of long-term abuse. If unprotection is on the cards here, it might be wise to err on the side of caution and drop to PC. Entranced98 (talk) 14:58, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Comment:: Are you sure that that's not because of the protection? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 20:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Normally I'd agree, the "there's no vandalism so no protection is needed" logic is regularly a flawed request, but ten years is certainly long enough to consider for a valid WP:TRYUNPROT request. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unprotection or pending changes protection: This article has been semi-protected since 2017, back when the subject was a popular YouTube star. Now that it's been almost eight years since the protection (and since his death), perhaps it's time to try unprotection or downgrade it to pending changes to see how it goes? The article has seen significantly less views recently (144,097 views in the past year compared to 449,007 in 2017) and just 12 edits so far this year. The protecting administrator hasn't been active since at least 2021. I'm fine if the current protection level is still necessary, since Samsara stated there had been "very few good changes from non-autoconfirmed." BriDash9000 (talk) 07:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This was indef-semied via this request by Daniel Case (his talk page is also protected, hence asking here first). This was probably inappropriate; the report said "repeated IP vandalism over the last 6 months", but there were a mere 2 vandalism edits over that time frame, both on the same day by the same IP. I don't see anything here that ever really rose to protection being needed. Thanks in advance. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
On hold: Hello, Pkk123477. Your edit request has been restored here as we need further input on this, as initially requested by Behappyyar. Would you be willing to post the sources that you have so that they can be reviewed and used to update the article? --Super Goku V (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
The join date of the US should be changed to 21 June, the strike Bombers took off from the US right after midnight Eastern Daylight Time on 21 June which would be 21 June 07:30 AM Iran time 2603:300B:E4D:8000:F08A:B088:141E:465F (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Add jd vance and marco rubio to american leaders 2600:387:F:560E:0:0:0:2E (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
The title has been blocked to read this when it should be Mulanthuruthy Marthoman Syrian Church. This needs to be fixed. JvathBdan (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JvathBdan: Start a requested-move discussion on the talk page, making sure to provide sources that can support the name. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC) |
| 19 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:21, 23 June 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
As of writing, I have created more than 50 articles from either redlinks or expanded redirects alongside ~30 templates, with only one superfluous template having been deleted. With a dozen Good Article and DYK citations, I believe I have proven myself in understanding the fomat and style of Wikipedia. My current project, to create articles on US Civil War-era ship classes, has and will quickly add more to the backlog. I have never had any issue with the New Page Patrol (that I recall), and would like to not add to their work as several of my previous articles/templates took months to be marked as reviewed (quite understandable, it's a large backlog!). My newest articles, all created since this weekend, (Mohican-class sloop, Sacramento-class sloop, Algoma-class sloop, and Potomac-class frigate) are well cited and comply with all requirments. Thank you! GGOTCC 02:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Requesting access to make minor edits like typos and formatting less tedious, and more efficiently find issues Actualcreature (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Requesting permission to use the duplicate citations function and to assist with general typo and grammar edits. Folkezoft (talk) 21:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request AWB user rights to assist with link retargeting and related maintenance tasks on the English Wikipedia, specifically as it pertains to comics-related articles. My primary goal is to efficiently update links to comply with WP:NCC, ensuring that pages link to the current, correct article titles. While I have been using the Move+ tool, I find that it does not fully meet the scale and complexity of my ongoing work, especially when dealing with numerous backlinks and links with section anchors or piped text. AWB’s batch editing capabilities and advanced find-and-replace options are essential for streamlining these tasks and maintaining consistency across many pages. Additionally, I have experience using tools like the redirect helper for managing redirect categorization templates, which complements the link updating work I intend to perform using AWB. I am committed to following Wikipedia’s guidelines and best practices when using AWB. Thank you for considering my request. Best regards, Red Shogun412 (talk) 22:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
My reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights is to fix some words and typos, spelling mistakes. stuxnet.02 My edits 00:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag. |
|---|
Mass message sender[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have just completed the NPPS and passed the final exams.[1] I want to contribute actively in reviewing new pages on English Wikipedia. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
I am reapplying for NPP rights. I have been contributing regularly as an AFC reviewer and have done good number of reviews so far. Also contributing in JUNE Backlog Drive. My AFD stats are above 90% accurate. Have improved my understanding since last request. I am aware of and have been doing PROD, CSD and drafting , understanding of which are required for NPP rights . Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm requesting rights be extended after a one month trial. I would like to request permanent NPR rights if possible, as I have greatly enjoyed contributing in this capacity and I am eager to help reduce the backlog. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 00:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm a patroller on the Hebrew Wikipedia with extensive experience in content review and Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with English Wikipedia's guidelines and have been actively participating here, including contributing to article creation and quality control processes. I would like to contribute to New Page Patrol, mainly on topics related to Israel, Judaism, and Hungary, and I would be happy to expand my knowledge and activity into additional areas. Eliezer1987 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
NPR temporary permissions set to expire within a week. Requesting extension or permanent permissions. I have not been as active in the NPR space as I'd like to be, being very busy with the AfC Backlog Drive. Regardless, thank you for your time! MWFwiki (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi there, my rights expire on the 30th and I would like to request an extension. I did ask a few weeks ago since I know of the perennial backlog here, but got rejected on the basis it was too early. I'm reapplying now since it's a little under a week until that happens. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
|---|
Page mover[edit] |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
I would like to be able to review edits that others have made, so I can check for vandalism. Floating Orb (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I've been on Wikipedia for almost 3 years and have made over 18.5k+ edits, I want to help out on reviewing pending changes. Thanks! Vestrian24Bio 10:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Have made 70,000 edits and hold rollback as well as New Page Reviewer. I think I can help with these too. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
I think I have enough experience editing and defending Wikipedia against vandalism. I routinely check the recent changes page, and know what vandalism or unexplained removal of content looks like. Therefore, I would like to review pending changes. I have read WP:PCR and understand it. If there is a edit that I'm not sure of, I will simply leave it for another editor to review. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 04:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello! When checking my watchlist of frequently-vandalized articles or patrolling recent changes, I frequently work with articles which have pending changes. When there's obvious vandalism or a BLP issue I can already help out by reverting, but I'm requesting the reviewer role so I can approve any non-bad edit I come across -- ones which I've always had to simply ignore as false positives. I've checked out WP:PC and WP:RPC to familiarize myself with the policies and guidelines around recent changes and the expectations of reviewers. I appreciate your consideration :) — tony 15:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
I may make mistakes, but we all grw from them. The reason why I want to be a pending changes reviewer is so that I can approve edits that are not inline with Wikipedia's rules. I think that, since I'll become extended-confirm soon, it's time to request this permission again. PawPatroler (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
Requesting Access for Full "Rollback Priviledges" to Fight Vandalism and Intrusive editors as I am now able to be online daily, with always keeping WP:ROLLBACK in mind. See My Activity for qualification/eligibility. Criticize (talk) 00:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I'm reaching out to request rollback rights so I can tackle vandalism more effectively. I've been actively patrolling recent changes and using Twinkle to revert vandalism, and I'd also like to try using Huggle which requires rollback permissions. I get that rollback is a fast-paced tool meant for clear cases of vandalism or unconstructive edits, and I'm well-versed in the relevant policies and guidelines. Thanks for considering my request! Igor123121 (talk) 08:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
I kindly request for Full Rollback Priviledges I was recently denied because of my poor quality to warn victim editors on their talk pages. I took that as a lesson and have improved on that rapidly quick. (Together with advice from 2 other loyal editors). But Please (Begging you) I really need these priviledges as I have read the advantages favor my abilities to warn editors Accurately Fast compared to The Default manual revert which is really delaying and a struggle. I recently attempted using the Twinkle Tool but it ruins the website's performance on my side (not sure why). Article modifications are coming in with blazing speed almost every milli-second. And the Default Manual Revert slows me down horribly. And victims may succeed in leaving damaged content on articles and other platforms, As Not every vandalism Fighter seems to be always online as much as I am now. Please grant me the priviledges. It would be a pleasure to protect Wikipedia into being a safe, decent, and clean community. You have my word. I will Never let you down sir/ma'am. Criticize (talk) 09:19, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
I am respectfully requesting rollback rights as I am committed to upholding the quality and reliability of Wikipedia by actively monitoring recent changes and promptly reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. Having familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, I believe that the rollback tool will allow me to more efficiently contribute to the maintenance of article integrity and the overall improvement of the encyclopedia. Vineyard93 (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |