User talk:Criticize

Welcome!

Hi Criticize! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Pbritti (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reversal of my edit on Denis Ten page

Hi, I was wondering why my recent edit was reverted in the programs section of the Denis Ten page? That section has the 2010-2011 section focused on two pieces by Franz Liszt in the free skating section, and I knew that if there were two or more works by the same composer, I would erase the first 'by Franz Liszt' and make it look like those works were by the same composer? I was surprised when I went to the contributions section of Wikipedia to find that my edit was reverted. Could you help to restore it? I was just doing that to improve, not to harm, the article. Sincerely, Meaghan Brown 108.26.172.49 (talk) 00:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert this edit?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jonas_Kersken&diff=prev&oldid=1296449430 176.108.139.1 (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was a mistake. I have corrected it back to yours Criticize (talk) 02:37, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explanations

Why did you revert my edit here? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=24-hour_clock&oldid=1296444264

I know there is a source, but the full meaning of "wee hours" would be "wee hours of the morning". And the period between 00:00 and 06:00 is postmidnight, and is not morning. 168.232.221.4 (talk) 04:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why did you revert vandalism to my user subpage then restore it? --pro-anti-air (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you try to leave warnings on the talk pages when reverting edits? --pro-anti-air (talk) 20:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Bengali queer literature, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. Criticize (talk) 08:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello Criticize. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Referentis (talk) 22:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice kindly received. Criticize (talk) 22:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Mistake

Sorry Citicize, I didn't see the box to put the explanation. 2600:1000:A022:570F:B0F7:6F7E:3314:3830 (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops :)

Hi Criticize, thanks for the revert at Tom Fernandez – if possible, remember to check if there might have been other vandalism in the revision reverted to. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]