Jump to content

User talk:Vanderwaalforces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Anosike

[edit]

User:Africa Athletics/sandbox

please review and assist in making updates to individuals page. notes are in this sandbox Africa Athletics (talk) 03:07, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Africa Athletics Hi there. This is an AI generated article which I am not willing to spend my time on as it would likely be futile. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

re: Shō Shitatsu gan

[edit]

Hey! Thank you so much for your review on Shō Shitatsu. I wanted to let you know I have a number of other GANs on Ryukyuan monarchs up for review rn, and they all use a very similar set of sources (since there's such a small amount of info known about them). Since you have access to the Smits sources, you'd probably have an easier time reviewing them than most. I don't wanna cause more work for you if you don't want to ofc, but for the purposes of the Wikicup, you could probably rack up some of those GAN points without as much work as a randomly sampled review. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:14, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You’re right, I actually plan on reviewing the ones I am able to. I have a couple GANs too if you don’t mind, I’d appreciate you looking too. :D Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:49, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"overly long"?

[edit]

Hi, I"m thinking of adding an article to the Good article review pool, but saw that you don't want "overly long" articles.

The two articles I've currently got ready are:

Would either of them be within your comfort zone, or would both be "overly long"? If one of them is within your comfort zone, I could add it to the current pool, but if they're both too long, I can wait until the next pool forms. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mr SB, double shuffle already reads interesting. I think we could go with that, thanks for reaching out. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I’ll add it to the pool today. Still working on some cites but that should be done soon. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Well well, it is surprising to see that my expectation (of being the one to review Double Shuffle) wasn’t exactly met, and I guess you had the same thoughts, lol. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:20, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 9

[edit]


MediaWiki message delivery 19:58, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

[edit]

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vanderwaalforces. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Ahmed Bakura Muhammad is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Ahmed Bakura Muhammad will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you bot... bleep blorp. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:42, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

[edit]

Hello Vanderwaalforces,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Ohuede dynasty is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Ohuede dynasty is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gommeh -- Gommeh (talk) 00:24, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft of Anthony Okon Placid

[edit]

hello @Vanderwaalforces

History allows us to solve some problems in the present and future. I have worked on a draft which later was assented to by you as Benneth Igweh as Wikipedia:NPOL. I worked on Anthony Okon Placid page, incumbent czar of Nigeria's Public relations, an appointive position that gives an occupant of the office the responsibility to manage the image of Nigeria Police Force. It was surprising when the draft was turned down on failure to meet significant coverage Notability of living persons. It was ironically surprising again when the predecessor of Anthony Okon Placid Benjamin Hundeyin who is his junior in rank in the force but was appointed as Force PRO by IGP was assented on Wikipedia:NPOL, with coverage from the appointment. I thought it much to seek your perspective before resubmission. Thanks Twicebefore (talk) 00:18, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Twicebefore I didn’t do any GNG checks as I think the subject doesn’t pass, but the subject definitely doesn’t meet NPOL inherently. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New article - Bindusagar

[edit]

Hi request you to review this new article Bindusagar (film). It is an Odia film. You seem to have worked on content related to the region.


Thank you Filmy World (talk) 06:38, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Ewedo is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Ewedo is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mr Serjeant Buzfuz -- Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:42, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Ewedo has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Ewedo has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mr Serjeant Buzfuz -- Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A Recent Blanking of a User Page

[edit]

Regarding User:Tanha2024. I just wanted to know what was the reason behind the blanking? Cosmic840 had put a G11 Tag on the page. I believe an Administrator would see that the page was tagged and would have deleted it. Thanks Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Enćenćecasïdća the user page was a clear WP:UPNOT. I usually prefer blanking promotional user pages to G11ing them, and I assume an administrator would agree with me in this example. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I see that. Just curious if there was a way to blank the rest of the page while keeping G11 intact? Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt if there’s a need to keep G11 intact, when the situation G11 is trying to solve has in fact been resolved. I mean, there’ll be no need to delete the user page by then. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't G11 create essentially a blank slate? An Administrator deletes it, I believe, means the visibility of the earlier revisions also goes away. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It prevents the vast majority of people from seeing it. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, including the editor who originally wrote it, so sometimes blanking is preferable, because many newbies don't realize that what they've written is too promotional for our standards. In this particular case though, that's pretty blatant, so I've actually blocked the account and I'll G11. -- asilvering (talk) 19:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. And thanks for all that you do. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Ohuede dynasty has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Ohuede dynasty has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gommeh -- Gommeh (talk) 23:05, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian village stubs

[edit]

Hi, I came across the articles Darband, Rudbar, Matkuh and Karat Kallehlu which you reviewed last year, and I wanted to remind you that census records are insufficient to establish notability for populated places. All three of these were previously deleted as part of a large batch of poorly sourced stubs that turned out not to be villages at all. Hopefully we can stop things like this from slipping through the cracks and avoid these geostub debacles in the future. –dlthewave 06:08, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlthewave I must admit that I have in fact stopped reviewing places articles unless they’re from my country or unless it is very obvious that it passes, this is the reason why I respect editors whose specialty is in WP:NPLACE, seriously haha. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:19, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Orhogbua is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Orhogbua is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 22:24, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Orhogbua has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Orhogbua has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 10:44, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Snap Judgments is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Snap Judgments is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 01:45, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Snap Judgments has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Snap Judgments has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Oguola is under review

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Oguola is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 21:44, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination of Oguola has passed

[edit]

Your good article nomination of the article Oguola has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 74

[edit]
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 74, March–April 2026
  • New partnership: Swissdox
  • User survey results
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User:Vanderwaalforces and is being posted here due to a redirect.)