Jump to content

User talk:DMacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Erich Clar page

[edit]

I want to include a synthetic reaction that is known as Clar's reaction. It is of a certain class of cyclic ketones that condense with themselves when heated to 400 C in a mixture of zinc dust and zinc chloride.

I will add references and a description of what it is used for in synthesizing new polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Fathoms Below
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


Tech News: 2026-03

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Hey, DMacks. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allotropes of oxygen, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Conformationadded.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Baking powder

[edit]

I did some work on Baking powder, I am not a chemist. If you are chemist, could you verify the changes I made? I found errors that I corrected.

Piñanana (talk) 05:42, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-04

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Should synthesis be included in the articles of chemical drugs?

[edit]

Hello, I'm a long-time reader, but yet a new editor of Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed the "Synthesis" section that I recently added on the page of a new drug Gepotidacin. In the version history, you said WP is not a lab manual, and patents are not reliable sources. I don't understand the first point you made. Indeed, too much details on the synthetic procedure is inappropriate, but since pages of a lot of chemicals include their synthetic procedures, and a drug is also intrinsically a chemical, isn't it good to add the synthetic pathway, especially for complex ones like gepotidacin and many other new drugs?

I'm new as an editor, so I'm not familiar with the editing conventions. Please elaborate on clarifying the point you made, thank you.

I currently recovered the Syntheis section, and to meet the RS requirement, a secondary source of a review article was used instead of the patent. If you still find the section inappropriate or undue, you can modify or delete it again, thank you. Sweet Hat 325 (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry and are already getting good advice there, so I'll leave thoughts there when I get a moment. But the main one was indeed relying on a patent. It took me a while as a new editor to recognize some of the "reliable source" rules such as that one. WP:RS is the key guideline on that topic. DMacks (talk) 18:29, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK

[edit]

Thanks for the message. I think that you know that I dont really have "disdain" for organic synthesis, but I get your point. I will lay off sparring and get back to business. --Smokefoot (talk) 18:36, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2026-05

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]