Jump to content

User:Phantomsteve/Admin-stuff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Phantomsteve (talk | contribs) at 20:00, 13 March 2010 (add style!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is a page with links to my actions as an administrator. It also has links which I will find useful in my role as an admin.

If you feel that an action that I have performed was wrong, please let me know on my User talk:Phantomsteve - I know that I will sometimes get it wrong, and if so I will remedy the situation!



My admin actions


Useful links

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 3
Requests for unblock 109
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 78
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 22
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 15
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 173
Requested RD1 redactions 4
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 3
Candidates for speedy deletion 79
Open sockpuppet investigations 67
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 3
Hoaxes 1
Vandalism 0
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 4
Possibly contested candidates 11
Other candidates 77
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 167 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 4 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Arbitration enforcement GiraffeLover19 (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., will log it now Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Upgrade to extended-confirmed protection until July 6th, when leaked trade to the Phoenix Suns can be confirmed official or not. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sushidude21! (talk) 10:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. HolyArtThou (talk) 12:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:24, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: An administrator of a website associated with this community (LessWrong) posted about the article on the website, calling some passages "inane", accusing editors of editing despite being topic banned, and encouraged his followers to edit the article (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/EQJfdqSaMcJyR5k73/#bfzEHGiiNtnRerujL). Since then the article has seen several SPAs show up making disruptive edits that need to be reverted, wasting editors' time. Some diffs: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1297131380&oldid=1297113741 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1297056458&oldid=1297033565 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationalist_community&diff=1296762013&oldid=1296528241 Eigenbra (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced attendance figures by various IP ranges and newly registered accounts. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism 2605:59C0:204E:FB08:719A:45D4:99CF:F4FD (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – UPE(I think would be the appropriate term here?) bouncing between account and IPs. See article talk page as well as Wikipedia:Help desk#Change of page. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 16:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anonymous user/s repeatedly disrupting the page. Greenman (talk) 17:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Highly visible page. per it being a highly-visible page and per WP:ARBPIA. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 17:47, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Box32 closed a couple hours ago, the author of the article is using other accounts and IPs to remove a copyedit banner that they don't like. Belbury (talk) 18:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

There's a blast from the past. I blocked the IP and gave it a week of semi. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Misinformation vandalism 185.84.70.222 (talk) 18:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism 185.84.70.222 (talk) 18:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: History of the team with a fa cup 74.12.181.3 (talk) 19:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: The talk page would need semi-protection, as it is being repeatedly targeted by a blocked user abusing dynamic IP to continue evading the block. Jeppiz (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism. RamiPat (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continuous since last protection expired. Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 20:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

As fas as I am concerned, the pending changes protection is working as intended. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sushidude21! (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Unprotection: Protection no longer needed after 16 years, which was semi-protected back in 2009. Absolutiva (talk) 10:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Pinging protecting admin @Future Perfect at Sunrise. Entranced98 (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Noting that the article falls under Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Balkans or Eastern Europe.-- Ponyobons mots 16:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Only 12 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: Is there any reason why the average editor would need to edit this? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Presumably the IP intends to nominate this and the below for deletion based on their other edits. But that doesn't require an unprotection; they can just request that the TfD tag be added using {{edit template-protected}}. However, what makes you think Not used in block summaries, unlike {{anonblock}}? Do you have any actual evidence of this, or are you just guessing? * Pppery * it has begun... 05:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Only 7 transclusions. Not used in block summaries, unlike {{school block}} 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:5AF:9096:9EC1:275E (talk) 16:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This article about this fondly remembered British children's animated series has been semi-protected for ten years, with little vandalism. Frankster04 (talk) 18:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) To this day the article's subject is plagued by rumours about character names being sexual innuendos, which appear to have inspired the vandalism that warranted the protection. Furthermore, there are a lot of vandalism edits made between May 2012 and February 2015 that look similar enough to be a possible case of long-term abuse. If unprotection is on the cards here, it might be wise to err on the side of caution and drop to PC. Entranced98 (talk) 14:58, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

 Comment:: Are you sure that that's not because of the protectionSumanuil. (talk to me) 20:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Normally I'd agree, the "there's no vandalism so no protection is needed" logic is regularly a flawed request, but ten years is certainly long enough to consider for a valid WP:TRYUNPROT request. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This was indef-semied via this request by Daniel Case (his talk page is also protected, hence asking here first). This was probably inappropriate; the report said "repeated IP vandalism over the last 6 months", but there were a mere 2 vandalism edits over that time frame, both on the same day by the same IP. I don't see anything here that ever really rose to protection being needed. Thanks in advance. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: I'm going to leave this to you. Perhaps indefinite pending changes would be fine, but I would also be fine with leaving it unchanged. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 06:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

  •  On hold: Hello, Pkk123477. Your edit request has been restored here as we need further input on this, as initially requested by Behappyyar. Would you be willing to post the sources that you have so that they can be reviewed and used to update the article? --Super Goku V (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

The join date of the US should be changed to 21 June, the strike Bombers took off from the US right after midnight Eastern Daylight Time on 21 June which would be 21 June 07:30 AM Iran time 2603:300B:E4D:8000:F08A:B088:141E:465F (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Add jd vance and marco rubio to american leaders 2600:387:F:560E:0:0:0:2E (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

The title has been blocked to read this when it should be Mulanthuruthy Marthoman Syrian Church. This needs to be fixed. JvathBdan (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@JvathBdan: Start a requested-move discussion on the talk page, making sure to provide sources that can support the name. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

The statement that : "9,000+ Israeli civilians displaced" and "8,000+ Israeli civilians homeless" at the bottom of the "Casualties and losses" panel is misinformation by omission. Civilian infrastructure was also destroyed in Iran (example https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/13/shock-fear-in-tehran-after-israel-bombs-residential-military-areas) and I think we should either remove the statement about Israeli civilians, or add one for Iranian civilians in case any estimate exists. Otherwise it makes it sound only Iran targeted civilian infrastructure. Chalchiutlicue (talk) 12:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Blocked text (request) 2025-06-21 19:34 Fully protected (log) Protected by MSGJ on 2022-02-25: "Highly visible template: used in interface messages"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
17 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-06-03 11:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Graph:Chart (request) 2025-06-03 22:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-09-04: "High-risk template or module: 5001 transclusions (more info)"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-06-05 03:06 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Infobox sports season (request) 2025-06-05 23:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Graph (request) 2025-06-11 07:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Mapframe (request) 2025-06-11 13:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fish and karate on 2018-05-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-06-15 00:13 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Post-nominals/CAN (request) 2025-06-15 01:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Medals table (request) 2025-06-18 18:56 Template-protected (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2018-09-23: "Highly visible template"
Template:Uw4im (request) 2025-06-18 20:07 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-19: "Highly visible template"
Template:Uw-delete4im (request) 2025-06-18 20:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2018-06-04: "Highly visible template"
Template:Taxonomy/CAM (request) 2025-06-19 09:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2024-09-01: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Taxonomy/Polysporangiophytes (request) 2025-06-19 15:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by TheSandDoctor on 2021-08-21: "Highly visible template - 79k uses"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-06-20 10:25 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Infobox musical artist (request) 2025-06-22 14:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox tennis tournament year (request) 2025-06-23 18:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Highlight/core (request) 2025-06-23 20:33 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:23, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

As of writing, I have created more than 50 articles from either redlinks or expanded redirects alongside ~30 templates, with only one superfluous template having been deleted. With a dozen Good Article and DYK citations, I believe I have proven myself in understanding the fomat and style of Wikipedia. My current project, to create articles on US Civil War-era ship classes, has and will quickly add more to the backlog. I have never had any issue with the New Page Patrol (that I recall), and would like to not add to their work as several of my previous articles/templates took months to be marked as reviewed (quite understandable, it's a large backlog!). My newest articles, all created since this weekend, (Mohican-class sloop, Sacramento-class sloop, Algoma-class sloop, and Potomac-class frigate) are well cited and comply with all requirments. Thank you! GGOTCC 02:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

You might want to go back to the Potomac-class frigate article and address the referencing errors that show up, GGOTCC. Schwede66 03:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done Upon a closer look, I see that those errors were introduced by an AWB run by Rich Smith. Schwede66 03:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
@Schwede66: and @GGOTCC:, sorry about that. Basically the cite errors appears as AWB converts 'others' to 'author', which cite book doesn't like as you should either have a first and last name OR an author. There is no need to put 'Internet Archive' there, so I've just removed it which resolved the error. - RichT|C|E-Mail 09:18, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
These things do happen with AWB runs. Stuff like that has happened to me too. It shouldn’t because one should check, but it does. I pinged you to (a) make you aware of it for future runs, and (b) because I thought you might want to go back over those edits. Great to hear that you are applying a fix, Rich Smith. Schwede66 10:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


Hello, I would like to use the editor mainly to have access to backreferences for editing using regular expressions. My actual use case would be to make a 300-line table sortable by last name. Work with data would also be useful. I also would like to be able to speed up formatting more generally, e.g. italics, quote marks, etc. Selbsportrait (talk) 22:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm back again! I previously requested this to help with WP:POSTMOVE for links to Guna language (then withdrew that request), but since then I've realised there are a few areas I could use this tool in, not least for updating non-linked uses of "Kuna" and "Cuna" for Guna language and Guna people (of which there seem to be quite a lot). I might also use it for linking/redlinking new articles (for instance, some of the drafts I'm currently working on), and also to help out with updating some of the 90,000+ articles transcluding (the now-deprecated) Template:EngvarB to other English-variety templates. Obviously there might also be some typo correction etc. as required. Pineapple Storage (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 17:10, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Hi there,

I'd like to request permission to add an English translation of a Wikipedia article I originally created (title: "Ukraine Art Aid Center" - currently available in Ukrainian and German). The article is about the organization I work for. The content has been reviewed and approved by our steering committee. I'm happy to provide any additional confirmations if needed.

Just a bit of background: I hold an MA in linguistics (English and German, Ivan Franko University in Lviv, Ukraine), completed a second MA program in English at a German university, and have over 10 years of experience working in English in areas like international development, cultural heritage, and cultural emergency response.

For the past couple of months, I’ve been trying to find a more experienced Wikipedia editor to help publish the English version of the article, but unfortunately haven’t had any luck. I’d be really grateful for the chance to publish it myself, as it would help raise awareness of our organization and support the important work we’re doing.

Thanks in advance for considering my request. I’m looking forward to your reply.

Warm regards, Vira Orlovska Vira Orlovska (talk) 11:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. You should create the translation in the Draft namespace and submit it for review. You don't need this user group to create a page in the Draft namespace. We don't really care that the content has been approved by your organisation as we're generally not interested in what an organisation has to say about itself - we're interested in summarising what other people have to say about the organisation. You will also need to disclose your connection to the organisation per the instructions on that page to comply with our Terms of Use. stwalkerster (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag.

Mass message sender

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights I have just completed the NPPS and passed the final exams.[2] I want to contribute actively in reviewing new pages on English Wikipedia. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I found UB's NPP training to be pretty exemplary and I think UB would make a good addition to the NPP team, over all. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you @Vanderwaalforces Uncle Bash007 (talk) 22:17, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Cassiopeia was my trainer for your verification. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 11:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done signed, Rosguill talk 17:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I am reapplying for NPP rights. I have been contributing regularly as an AFC reviewer and have done good number of reviews so far. Also contributing in JUNE Backlog Drive. My AFD stats are above 90% accurate. Have improved my understanding since last request. I am aware of and have been doing PROD, CSD and drafting , understanding of which are required for NPP rights . Thank you. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 16:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done, last time I pointed out issues with neutrality at Nandan Van Zoo. Rather than incorporating critical coverage into the article, you just cleaned up the formatting. That's not what I had asked you to do, and suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of what neutrality means on Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 17:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I'm requesting rights be extended after a one month trial. I would like to request permanent NPR rights if possible, as I have greatly enjoyed contributing in this capacity and I am eager to help reduce the backlog. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 00:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 00:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm a patroller on the Hebrew Wikipedia with extensive experience in content review and Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with English Wikipedia's guidelines and have been actively participating here, including contributing to article creation and quality control processes. I would like to contribute to New Page Patrol, mainly on topics related to Israel, Judaism, and Hungary, and I would be happy to expand my knowledge and activity into additional areas. Eliezer1987 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

NPR temporary permissions set to expire within a week. Requesting extension or permanent permissions. I have not been as active in the NPR space as I'd like to be, being very busy with the AfC Backlog Drive. Regardless, thank you for your time! MWFwiki (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 21:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, my rights expire on the 30th and I would like to request an extension. I did ask a few weeks ago since I know of the perennial backlog here, but got rejected on the basis it was too early. I'm reapplying now since it's a little under a week until that happens. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 23:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

I am requesting page mover right mainly because it would help me draftify articles (see my draftify log). And secondarily because it would allow me to perform uncontroversial moves in mainspace without leaving being redirects. I have not participated in RMs but I have made moves that show that I understand the guidelines, namely:

And more recently

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5][6]). MusikBot talk 08:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
This is a request for WP:PCR, not WP:ROLLBACK. Did you apply for the correct permission? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
I did, but I have Twinkle and RedWarn. What really irritates me is that there are often about 10 changes but I can only revert them. Starfall2015 let's talk profile 15:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Have made 70,000 edits and hold rollback as well as New Page Reviewer. I think I can help with these too. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:22, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

I think I have enough experience editing and defending Wikipedia against vandalism. I routinely check the recent changes page, and know what vandalism or unexplained removal of content looks like. Therefore, I would like to review pending changes. I have read WP:PCR and understand it. If there is a edit that I'm not sure of, I will simply leave it for another editor to review. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 04:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Chetsford (talk) 05:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! When checking my watchlist of frequently-vandalized articles or patrolling recent changes, I frequently work with articles which have pending changes. When there's obvious vandalism or a BLP issue I can already help out by reverting, but I'm requesting the reviewer role so I can approve any non-bad edit I come across -- ones which I've always had to simply ignore as false positives. I've checked out WP:PC and WP:RPC to familiarize myself with the policies and guidelines around recent changes and the expectations of reviewers. I appreciate your consideration :) — tony 15:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I may make mistakes, but we all grw from them. The reason why I want to be a pending changes reviewer is so that I can approve edits that are not inline with Wikipedia's rules. I think that, since I'll become extended-confirm soon, it's time to request this permission again. PawPatroler (talk) 23:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7][8]). MusikBot talk 23:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Hello! I'm reaching out to request rollback rights so I can tackle vandalism more effectively. I've been actively patrolling recent changes and using Twinkle to revert vandalism, and I'd also like to try using Huggle which requires rollback permissions.

I get that rollback is a fast-paced tool meant for clear cases of vandalism or unconstructive edits, and I'm well-versed in the relevant policies and guidelines.

Thanks for considering my request! Igor123121 (talk) 08:38, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 15:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

I kindly request for Full Rollback Priviledges I was recently denied because of my poor quality to warn victim editors on their talk pages. I took that as a lesson and have improved on that rapidly quick. (Together with advice from 2 other loyal editors). But Please (Begging you) I really need these priviledges as I have read the advantages favor my abilities to warn editors Accurately Fast compared to The Default manual revert which is really delaying and a struggle. I recently attempted using the Twinkle Tool but it ruins the website's performance on my side (not sure why). Article modifications are coming in with blazing speed almost every milli-second. And the Default Manual Revert slows me down horribly. And victims may succeed in leaving damaged content on articles and other platforms, As Not every vandalism Fighter seems to be always online as much as I am now.

Please grant me the priviledges. It would be a pleasure to protect Wikipedia into being a safe, decent, and clean community. You have my word. I will Never let you down sir/ma'am. Criticize (talk) 09:19, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@Criticize There's no point making a new request, when your previous request was declined so soon. It hasn't even been archived yet! Please wait atleast 2 weeks before making a new request. Begging rights like that would be considered Hat collecting There are plenty of other tools out there. Twinkle is not the only tool. In fact rollback is actually worse compared to other tools, when it comes to reverting. If you contribute using a desktop, you can also try RedWarn, or it's successor Ultraviolet. Cheers! OPHYRIUS 09:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
@Ophyrius
I strictly take back the begging and pleading part! I was indeed desperate yesterday.
Funny you now say rollback is worse. (Not sure if I can believe you)
Just this morning I coded a python update to a script entry I took from the anti-vandal tool. And it shockingly improved the speed of the manual revert method efficiently on my side.
And reduced time to auto warn editors, with customizable settings.
Not sure if I should come back to make another request. But I certainly will if i'm interested.
However, I still have this burning desire to help Wikipedia, and it can't be stopped.
Have a good day. Criticize (talk) 09:43, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm saying that as I personally have used it & I find other tools better. I used that permission for other tools like Antivandal & SWViewer OPHYRIUS 11:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Nothing has changed since your prior declined request. Malinaccier (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

I am respectfully requesting rollback rights as I am committed to upholding the quality and reliability of Wikipedia by actively monitoring recent changes and promptly reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. Having familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, I believe that the rollback tool will allow me to more efficiently contribute to the maintenance of article integrity and the overall improvement of the encyclopedia. Vineyard93 (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([9]). MusikBot talk 01:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor