Jump to content

User:MouseCursor

This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses RedWarn for the quickest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!)
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MouseCursor
— Wikipedian  —
Account statistics
AutoconfirmedYes
Extended confirmedYes
Pending changes reviewerYes
SignatureTheWikipedetalk 14:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Userboxes
5Very low levels of vandalism.
1.78 RPM
VANDALS BEWARE! This user attacks vandalism and reverts it immediately.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
THANK YOU VANDALS ! ! !
...for increasing my edit count >:)
This user goes by "MouseCursor" across Wikimedia.
This contributor to Wikipedia is male.
This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This user believes
this isn't pretty

This user has both Ultraviolet and Twinkle, and may use them together!
This user can code in Scratch.
Scratch-4This user is an expert Scratch programmer.
js-2This user is an intermediate JavaScript programmer.
py-2This user is an intermediate Python programmer.
Kaboom!! Oh, that was just this user obliterating vandals, nothing to worry about. Except if you're the vandal.[Humor]
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user is not a Wikipedia administrator, and does not mind becoming one someday. However, he will do perfectly well without this role.
How to improve Wikipedia's reliability

Since anyone can edit almost any Wikipedia article, it is possible for biased, out of date, or incorrect information to be added to Wikipedia. To improve Wikipedia's reliability, fix these problems by doing the following:

  1. As often as you can, monitor and check changes made to articles. Your Watchlist, and the Related changes and Recent changes features are useful for this.
  2. Clean up vandalism and report vandals to Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV). Many vandalism clean-up tools are available to assist you.
  3. Fix mistakes:
  4. For dubious statements that are not sourced or are likely to be challenged, hunt for references that are reliable, relevant, accurate, objective, and timely. Add citations for these to the article.
  5. Read the references provided by articles and check them for reliability, relevance, accuracy, objectivity, and timeliness. That is, read the source material cited, and remove irrelevant or unreliable citations.
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}