Jump to content

User:TexasAndroid

This user is a WikiGnome.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.

Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :))

My barnstar collection is here.

Current Projects

Icon This user has been on Wikipedia for 20 years, 1 month and 16 days.
enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.
This user is a member of the
Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This editor is a WikiGnome.
♂This user is male.
This user participates in
WikiProject Categories
to improve Wikipedia categorization.
This user has created a global account.
(-o-) This user plays the Pokémon RPGs and other related video games.
719 This user has owned 719 species of Pokémon in Pokémon X.
This user uses Google Maps.
This editor is a
Master Editor IV
and is entitled to display this
Orichalcum Editor Star.

100k+

Current Outstanding admin load

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 108
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 11
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 11
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 18
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 140
Requested RD1 redactions 1
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 16
Open sockpuppet investigations 77
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports

User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 1
Vandalism 2
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 8
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 214 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 27 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


refers to military regiment. Only 1 edit so far. Secretlondon (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Multiple IPs edit warring. 88.97.192.42 (talk) 18:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection would keep you from editing. Are you OK with that? Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High Level of IP disruptive editing. I am almost certain the edits are being made in good faith. Several IPS are updating stats which is great, but there it is generally agreed on at WP:Cricket to not update stats until a match has ended. I suggest semi-protection for 4 or 5 days as the Test will definitely be done by then. Thank you Servite et contribuere (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – A victim of violence during the Siege of Al-Qarara / Gaza war, relevant to WP:ARBPIA and should be ECP under those sanctions. Thank you. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:12, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing due to high level of ip vandalism. —⚰️NΛSΛ B1058 (TALK) 10:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruption as soon as previous protection expired. Probable sock. Mellk (talk) 11:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP section blanking. Has been protected multiple times for a few weeks and problems occur within 24hrs of protection dropping. Would potentially request more permanent protection. Quinby (talk) 12:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 12:55, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism, including IPs 2600:…0:00:0. (semi) 93.64.85.242 (talk) 13:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Declined – Socks need not apply. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All but one IP edit (which was a minor typo fix) has been reverted since protection was reduced to pending changes in March. Doesn't look like this problem is going away any time soon, if ever. Entranced98 (talk) 13:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Return of editing behaviours stemming from last page protection (which ended on July 1). livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:23, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Following death of Jota of Liverpool, rumours exist that his number might be retired. Only rumours. Egghead06 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring between confirmed users, already semi-protected, should be full protected for a while. Vestrian24Bio 16:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High Level of IP disruptive editing. I am almost certain the edits are being made in good faith. 2409:40F2:3E:FCAD:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 16:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Returned after a year of semi, protection log shows that this is a frequent target for childish vandalism and BLP issues. Entranced98 (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated ban evasion activity immediately after protection was removed. Likely related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 17:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Similar to concurrent request for Ted Grant, repeated ban evasion activity likely related to ongoing issues with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkFinSoupEater. Rambling Rambler (talk) 17:41, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 19:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Falls under WP:CT/ARBPIA restrictions. A lot of activity from IP/non-WP:ECP users. Astaire (talk) 19:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 21:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 21:08, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandals. ZimZalaBim talk 21:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death. Brojam (talk) 22:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Disruptive Editing by ip's. Untamed1910 (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent frequent IP vandalism. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:58, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Reduce to indefinite semi-protection since no other NFL teams' pages are ECP (been in place for 4 years), feels a bit unfair to new users who actually have good edits to make on the team. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @El C Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This title (with a lowercase L in place of an I - lnto) was protected in 2013 for appearing in this xkcd comic, despite having never been created. Per WP:NOPREEMPT, I don't see any reason why this should remain protected 12½ years later. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:4839:F2ED:BF8F:52B8 (talk) 13:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

What would you do with it if it was unprotected? And did you contact the protecting administrator? ~Anachronist (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Please correct the Iranian civilian casualties in paragraph three. First it was changed without reason from 200 to 600. Then someone changed and separated the estimate by Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency (HRANA) estimate to be over 1,100 civilians killed which is conflating all deaths with civilians. No source was added to support this. The sources currently listed next to these sentences actually say 200 but these are out off date. HRANA's latest figure is actually 431 civilians killed. The source is presently used in the infobox for their own estimate of 1,190 total deaths. The Iranian government hasn't released updated figures so that should be removed until they have an estimate. I suggest adding the following sentence:

"According to the anti-government Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency, 1,190 Iranians were killed including at least 431 civilians."

102.17.120.130 (talk) 11:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
2025 Mobile mayoral election (request) 2025-07-02 18:41 Fully protected, expires 2025-07-09 at 18:16:21 UTC (log) Protected by SarekOfVulcan on 2025-07-02: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Brazilian Portuguese (request) 2025-07-04 03:30 Fully protected, expires 2025-07-05 at 09:24:45 UTC (log) Modified by Ritchie333 on 2025-07-03: "escalating protection as edit warring is continuing"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
19 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-06-03 11:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Graph:Chart (request) 2025-06-03 22:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-09-04: "High-risk template or module: 5001 transclusions (more info)"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-06-05 03:06 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Infobox sports season (request) 2025-06-05 23:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Graph (request) 2025-06-11 07:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Post-nominals/CAN (request) 2025-06-15 01:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Taxonomy/CAM (request) 2025-06-19 09:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2024-09-01: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Taxonomy/Polysporangiophytes (request) 2025-06-19 15:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by TheSandDoctor on 2021-08-21: "Highly visible template - 79k uses"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-06-20 10:25 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Infobox tennis tournament year (request) 2025-06-23 18:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox organization (request) 2025-06-25 18:55 Template-protected (log) Protected by Wugapodes on 2020-04-12: "Highly visible template: Restore protection after undeletion"
Template:Infobox racing driver (request) 2025-06-27 23:09 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Archives (request) 2025-07-01 00:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Episode list (request) 2025-07-01 08:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2013-10-18: "Highly visible template: template protection is now standard for high-risk templates"
Template:DYK archive header (request) 2025-07-01 16:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by Maile66 on 2019-09-05: "Edited without discussion"
Module:Flagg (request) 2025-07-02 10:20 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2020-07-02: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Template:Infobox road/hide/countries (request) 2025-07-04 03:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-18: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox country (request) 2025-07-04 12:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Editnotices/Page/List of animated Internet series (request) 2025-07-04 22:02 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:04, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

+1 This editor writes awesome articles. Toadspike [Talk] 15:20, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done asilvering (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

7-year vet of the site, multiple GANs and DYKs, 51 mainspace articles created of which 49 are live (G6 and G7 deletions for the other two). Etzedek24 (Talk) (Contribs) 20:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: This request is not for myself.
Dear admins, please grant the WP:APAT to User:BlaUser234. Otherwise, we see many cockroaches in WP:NPP every day:) Thank you. HumanRight 14:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 13 articles. MusikBot talk 14:30, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Human Right Wiki, you accidentally asked for this for yourself. Can you resubmit? Thanks. -- asilvering (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Ctxz2323 has created nearly 170 articles, none of which were deleted. All the ones I've checked are very solid and well-sourced. Toadspike [Talk] 15:31, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

The copyright note from Diannaa from less than a year ago on their talk page makes me a bit nervous. How exhaustive were those source checks? Translationvio in particular tends to be easy to miss if you're not really intentionally looking. -- asilvering (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Resubmitting #User:Human Right Wiki above as a procedural action, not an endorsement on the merits. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:39, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser


Request AWB permissions to assist with several cleanup tasks across my WikiProjects of interests such as Women in Red, India, Computational Biology, and others. Types of cleanups often include fixing typos, especially for WP:INDIA where {{tl:Use Indian english}} is often used but content may not reflect that, or vice-versa. Other general cleanups that I do include fixing line or paragraph breaks, infobox lists, or basic copyediting. I believe I used to have AWB access years ago, but it expired due to inactivity. I intend to use the JS interface of AWS. Thanks!— WeWake (talk) 06:37, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 18:40, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Need AWB under bot section, per Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CX Zoom AWB 2. Thanks! CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 16:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Can I have EC because my alt has it too. I thought confirmed was enough but I want EC too. Proof so I don't have to confirm again. --Anti-pro-air (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done. I've gone ahead and also revoked the confirmed user flag since your alt account is already autoconfirmed. Mz7 (talk) 00:42, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request for an extended confirmed in other to participate in Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos 2025. Thank you Kwameghana(Bright Kwame Ayisi) (talk) 13:41, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Not that I see any issue with you having ECR, but why didn’t you just make 30 edits in the two years since you last requested this…? LordDiscord (talk) 14:33, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Please provide specific examples of how you are being prevented from contributing. Nothing about this should be needed to for uploading to commonswiki, or from making edit requests on pages here. — xaosflux Talk 14:36, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
m:Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos is restricted to extended confirmed users by Special:AbuseFilter/1258. That said,  Not done, since there's a reason for that rule -- inexperienced users (including your past self, although you're nowhere near as bad as some others were) have gotten into trouble for making inappropriate image additions as part of the contest. Why on earth do you expect us to circumvent our standard procedures to allow you to participate in something that you're not entitled to participate in, and where careless participation has caused much harm in the past, when you can't even be bothered to do your share of what is expected by making 30 edits elsewhere first to qualify via the normal process and couldn't even follow the correct procedures for asking for permissions? No, thanks. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:00, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for event coordinator

Event coordinator

I'm co-organizing an edit-a-thon at an academic conference: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/EC_conference/EC'25_Wiki_edit-a-thon?enroll=owsebpjm

EC (https://ec25.sigecom.org/) is the main academic conference at the intersection of Economics and Computer Science. We're hosting an edit-a-thon to encourage conference attendees to edit, with a focus on technical entries at the interface of our research and general public interest. Aviad.rubinstein (talk) 17:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

That link is dead. Also, if you're using the programs and events dashboard, you should set up the dashboard to allow people to request accounts, which would obviate the need for you to have event coordinator access. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:54, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Hi, I'm requesting rights be extended after a one month trial. I would like to request permanent NPR rights if possible, as I have greatly enjoyed contributing in this capacity and I am eager to help reduce the backlog. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ (Talk) 00:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 00:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done, until Sept 2025. Sohom (talk) 03:36, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm a patroller on the Hebrew Wikipedia with extensive experience in content review and Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with English Wikipedia's guidelines and have been actively participating here, including contributing to article creation and quality control processes. I would like to contribute to New Page Patrol, mainly on topics related to Israel, Judaism, and Hungary, and I would be happy to expand my knowledge and activity into additional areas. Eliezer1987 (talk) 16:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done, I'm not comfortable at this time giving you the NPP userright. Typically, on enwiki we do not consider cross-wiki experience especially in the context of en-wiki-specific-content heavy permission like NPP. The fact that you want to work on the currently "unstable" area of WP:PIA coupled with your lack of AFD participation and the fact that relatively recently created articles like Rafael Hayun use unreliable sources like Tiktok make this a no for now. Sohom (talk) 03:23, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

NPR temporary permissions set to expire within a week. Requesting extension or permanent permissions. I have not been as active in the NPR space as I'd like to be, being very busy with the AfC Backlog Drive. Regardless, thank you for your time! MWFwiki (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 21:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done, as you mention yourself, you haven't been as active, I don't see any obvious red flags, so extended until Sept 2025, have fun reviewing! :) Sohom (talk) 03:01, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, my rights expire on the 30th and I would like to request an extension. I did ask a few weeks ago since I know of the perennial backlog here, but got rejected on the basis it was too early. I'm reapplying now since it's a little under a week until that happens. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 23:34, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)) and has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). MusikBot talk 23:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
They've expired now. Aydoh8[what have I done now?] 04:03, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Done, till Sept 2025, noting that an article structured like Julie Andrews (academic) could probably do with a bit of tagging in terms of prose improvements, but I don't see issues with core notability judgements. Sohom (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

I was granted reviewer rights for two times, both were temporary. I'm here requesting the right again to review the articles and make the burden less for others too. I was not active like before due to some personal issues, but I'm going to be active now. Please consider extending my rights. Thankyou Taabii (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 17:30, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello there, this is my third time requesting new page reviewer permissions, as the previous two requests were granted on a one-month trial basis and the current trial will end on the 30th of June. I have learnt a lot about the policies for notability and inclusion and will be able to reduce the size of the unreviewed pages backlog significantly. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 06:07, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 06:10, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

I am currently an AFC reviewer and am familiar with the deletion processes. I would like to help clear the backlog as well as help in identifying spam, copyrighted and promo pages. I believe I meet the criteria for this right. I am requesting a trial. Thanks Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 01:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 09:30, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done till Sept 2025 Sohom (talk) 03:30, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, my rights expired and I completely forgot to reapply till now. I would like to request an extension, as I think I didn't do enough patrolling to warrant a permanent grant (thanks AfC backlog drive). Thank you. mwwv converseedits 01:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done till Sept 2024, no red flags! Sohom (talk) 03:31, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

I have had two 1 month trials before which just expired so I am here to ask to continue, or for indefinite, which ever is more appropriate. Moritoriko (talk) 06:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done, until Sept 2025. Sohom (talk) 03:38, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

My current NPR rights are due to expire on 1 July 2025. While I may not be reviewing in large volumes, I focus on thorough, policy-aligned reviews that aim to improve or appropriately tag each page. I’d like to keep my NPR rights for continued constructive contributions. Thank You. Ambrosiawater (talk) 07:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 1 July 2025 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm interested in doing NPP reviews. I think I've gone over the rules for creating new pages and and using references pretty thoroughly. ColinSchm (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 413 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 12:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I want to help out with NPP as there is been a longstanding backlog. I requested this right last year, but was told participate more in AfD discussions. Since, I have participated and as well as nominated for deletions. I think I'm ready now, thanks! Vestrian24Bio 02:57, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

I saw there was a large backlog and reviewing articles is a nice change of pace. I have review experience from the required review when submitting DYK articles. Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 15:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you for your interest, but it looks like you are currently pblocked from mainspace for copyright violations. I think this block would need to be removed before you could be considered for NPP. Feel free to re-apply in the future though. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Hi! I have initiated a couple of RMs myself, and participated in many as well. I also make requests at WP:RMT. I also revert undiscussed page moves while patrolling changes.

Now, I want to contribute more by closing RMs and helping at WP:RMT and this right would also be useful while reverting undiscussed page moves as well.

I have made 170+ RM-related edits and 30+ edits to RMT page. Thanks for considering... Vestrian24Bio 02:40, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

I found a reviewable edit that was not good and had already been reverted the first time it was placed. I reverted the new version of it, since the edit was not following the Wikipedia guidelines. I think that I should have Reviewing pending changes rights, since I have experience with reverting vandalism and disruptive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floating Orb (talkcontribs) 19:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

Note: I added the signature and formatted the request correctly after it was placed (diff). CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 19:47, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 19:50, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Sorry, I still don't think your ready yet. In addition to the complaints from before, you've picked up a copyvio warning since your previous request, which does not bode well. And blanking/archiving your talk page right after making this request, while of course procedurally allowed, reeks of a bad-faith attempt to cover your tracks. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:43, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

I’ve been using Twinkle to revert vandalism from recent changes and warn users for a while now. I’ve been doing this for about two years, with some breaks because of school and life, but I’ve stayed consistent overall. I know what counts as vandalism and what doesn’t, and I always try to assume good faith. I’d really appreciate rollback to help make reverting quicker and save time. I can be trusted with the tool and use it properly. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Mz7 (talk) 00:51, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi I am requesting rights to use the rollback feature as finding vandalism has actually been a very cool thing for me. I am requesting to be able so I don't have to undo multiple edits by spam-vandals, as I feel like it makes me kind of a spammer when I do this, and doing it all at once would be a great thing. I will admit that I had absolutely no idea that anyone could post warnings on talk pages, I thought that only admins and other experienced members who are given rights could do so. I just want to feel like less of a spammer when reverted edits, so I am requesting this rollback feature. Thanks, MakaylaHippo1998 MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. do i have any chance to be given rollback rights to fight vandalism better? If possible. Criticize (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5][6]). MusikBot talk 16:10, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Stop WP:Hat collecting. This request says nothing that the previous requests didn't say before. And while you have now mostly started warning other editors, here's another morsel to consider: only a week ago you said modifications are coming in with blazing speed almost every milli-second, which is both not true (the average edit rate is around 2 edits per second, or one per 500 milliseconds), and evinces an attitude incompatible with rollback access; it's more important to be correct in what you are reverting, and to take those few seconds to think, than to race to the bottom trying to revert edits as fast as possible. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor


    Immediate requests

    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 112
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 16
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2

    Deletion

    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 716
    Templates for deletion 62
    Categories for deletion 141
    Wikipedia files for discussion 26
    All redirects for discussion 326
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 26
    Possible copyright violations 33
    All articles proposed for deletion 305
    All files proposed for deletion 16
    Unsorted AfD debates 0
    All files with the same name on Commons 214
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 400
    Unknown copyright status 29
    Unknown source 18
    No non-free use rationale 1
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 23

    Page protection

    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,274
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 454
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,763
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,337 0.49
    All articles needing rewrite 6,246 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,335 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 41,505 0.59

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,564 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 551,639 7.86
    All articles lacking sources 48,868 0.7
    All unreferenced BLPs 29 0
    All articles needing additional references 497,917 7.09
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,839 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 107,159 1.53
    All articles with dead external links 292,103 4.16

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 134 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 28 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,258 0.02
    All articles to be split 822 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 0 -
    Stub categories 20,236 -
    All uncategorized pages 467 0.01
    All orphaned articles 54,412 0.78
    All articles needing copy edit 2,224 0.03
    All articles with style issues 19,562 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,782 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,644 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    Category Entries
    Requested moves 811
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 4,041
    All accuracy disputes 15,827
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 0
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 5
    All articles to be expanded 65,399

    Special pages

    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links