User:TexasAndroid
Computer programmer from San Antonio, Texas.
Reverter of vandalism, and wiki-link cleaner. (I'm no great author of Wiki pages, but I'm good at cleaning up other people's messes. :))
My barnstar collection is here.
Current Projects
 |
| en | This user is a native speaker of the English language. |
 | This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. |
 | This user lives in the U.S. State of Texas. |
.svg?lang=en){kind=small} | This user is male. |
 | This user participates in WikiProject Categories to improve Wikipedia categorization. |
 | This user has created a global account. |
|
This user plays the Pokémon RPGs and other related video games. |
.svg?lang=en){kind=icon}
|
This user uses Google Maps. |
 | This editor is a Master Editor IV and is entitled to display this Orichalcum Editor Star. |
| 100k+ |
Current Outstanding admin load
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-16138 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1102 five times in the last 5 minutes (Rapid disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-16581 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1361 (LTA 1361, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Not great, but not vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-16655 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- ~2025-31939-01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Been blocked multiple times. Hasn't learned anything from it. Nswix (talk) 18:16, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Jwh41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) article Wu Chun Changing name of BLP without source repeatedly after being reverted 3 times so edit warring etc. In conclusion adding without source, edit warring and BLP violations.Theknoledgeableperson (SHOUT HERE) 19:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ghfvkbg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – LTA. – LuniZunie(talk) 20:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- It would be better to report them once they have some edits, as otherwise they can, theoretically, be anyone with a random bunch of letters for a username... ~Lofty abyss 20:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Lofty abyss Sorry, very true. Will report once they make an edit.
Going to remove this report for now.– LuniZunie(talk) 20:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Lofty abyss Sorry, very true. Will report once they make an edit.
- @LuniZunie: Please provide more information on these LTA reports. Which LTA and what is the evidence? Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Daniel Quinlan Yummie, based on two recent users: User:Yjgjfbxg and User:Yjhifndgf. Lofty is correct though in that I should be waiting. – LuniZunie(talk) 20:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- It would be better to report them once they have some edits, as otherwise they can, theoretically, be anyone with a random bunch of letters for a username... ~Lofty abyss 20:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Steveclarke2022 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. adequate warning or not, the account shows evidence of sleeper account that is logged in sporadically to carryout specific spam payload and only for that purpose. See edit history. This is a clear cut case of WP:NOTHERE. Graywalls (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- They haven't edited in the last 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I know, but the purpose of restrictions is preventive, not punitive. The account was created spammed in May 2022, came back to spam again in July 2023, took a break and came back only to spam again in July 2025. So I feel this is a good indication of where it's going. It's a spam only account from one of the spam farms. They've not made a single non-spam edit. Graywalls (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- They haven't edited in the last 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ViKaZo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch): Creation of articles with possible LLM. He used to move the draft to mainspace when AFC declines. And if someone draftify the article due to its problems, he is moving it back to mainspace without significant improvement and. Rajasthan Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) , Rajasthan Educational Service. Editor didn’t agree that he uses AI. AlphaCore talk 20:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I handled this report before seeing Daniel's decline. I have partially blocked them from moving pages. I have moved a couple of their articles to draft space. PhilKnight (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @PhilKnight and AlphaCore: It might still be worth reporting this to ANI, but it's probably best to wait and see if they continue. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Partially blocked. Partially blocked by PhilKnight. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I handled this report before seeing Daniel's decline. I have partially blocked them from moving pages. I have moved a couple of their articles to draft space. PhilKnight (talk) 20:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-17002 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Keeps vandalizing by adding unsourced additions to the page Candy Raymond. Been Told several times but he doesn't stop. DrKilleMoff (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. This looks like a different person than the previous edits.
Page protected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-15464 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Also ~2025-43174-38. Making identical edits to old IP 2804:14D:ECF1:82BE:8DB:E4AC:614D:5043, which along with others, was blocked for these same tendentious inappropriate edits.oknazevad (talk) 21:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- SONICXMARIO2028WINTERGAMES (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Diddy100 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. – LuniZunie(talk) 01:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. LuniZunie, the term has multiple meanings, as can be seen from Do Wah Diddy Diddy . Only by seeing actual edits can we determine whether anything is misleading. Cullen328 (talk) 07:57, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- AllCoolEntertainment (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Peterxy（talk） 14:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Wait until the user edits. Then we'll see if they're promoting anything, and whether that anything is related to the username. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Reason: Add semi-protection please (blocks edits from IPs/new accounts). At least 5 IP vandalism edits in the recent past. Thanks. TudorTulok (talk) 16:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – TAs repeatedly adding "framing device" text to plot summary despite no consensus at Talk page favoring inclusion. DonIago (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent disruptive unsourced and poorly sourced additions from anons. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 18:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yue🌙 (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previous protection expired but the issue has returned and appears to be different users still. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Semi-protected again for 3 months due to ongoing editing. If some subsequent consensus forms resolving the dispute, any uninvolved admin may remove the protection without informing me. - jc37 21:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppets have been vandalizing the page repeatedly. Noah, BSBATalk 19:45, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yue🌙 (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous IP that keeps add unsourced material. DrKilleMoff (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. Launchballer 20:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I agree. I'd either like that, or a permanent semi-protection, due to her being such a big topic. People being people on the internet however, they'll definitely vandalize her page. I mean the way she got famous is one of a kind, and she's part of OnlyFans so there's bound to be vandalism.
- Or at least a permanent pending changes-protection.
- Thanks! DetectiveClarinet15 (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. I don't think extended confirmed is needed because semi-protection should keep out most if not all of the users making BLP policy violations. I don't see any productive edits from TAs or new users in the past year, and I don't think pending changes is the right choice because her current occupation attracts the kind of vandalism that would usually be redacted. Yue🌙 (talk) 21:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Indefinite protection seems necessary as there seems to be a user utilizing different accounts top persistently insert content without proper sources. See also the talk page, where there have been requests for the content to be added back without any rationale or sources. BlockArranger (talk) 20:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Repeated addition of unsourced / OR by multiple anons. Adakiko (talk) 21:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Possible socking; re-request and note that if the disruptive edits resume after the protection ends. Yue🌙 (talk) 22:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting a request for unprotection, please discuss it with the protecting administrator first. You can create a request below only if you receive no response from them.
To find out which administrator protected the page, go to the page's edit history and click on the "View logs for this page" link (located underneath the page's title). The protecting administrator is listed in the protection log entry, next to the words "protected", "changed protection level", or "configured pending changes". If there are a large number of log entries on the page, use the drop-down menu near the top of the page and select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" to filter the logs accordingly.
DO NOT request a reduction in protection if...
- ...you are being prevented from editing the page. A desire to change content is not a valid reason for unprotection. Instead:
- If you can edit the article's talk page, use the WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose a change on the article's talk page. Include an explanation of the exact content that you want to change, and what the content will be afterward.
- If the article's talk page is protected, you may propose a change at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Edit.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is that the article has not been vandalized. That simply means the protection is working as intended.
- ...your reasoning for reducing protection is basically "a long time has passed" without supporting details.
- ...you haven't contacted the protecting administrator.
You may request a protection reduction below if...
- ...you want to change the protection level of a template or module from full protection to template protection. You may add the request to this page without having to discuss it with the protecting administrator first.
- ...you need to remove creation protection from a location where no page exists (redlinked pages) after a draft version of the intended article is prepared beforehand and ready to be published.
- ...you are proposing a trial reduction in protection for a page that has been protected for several years, provided the proposal is supported by evidence such as talk page activity, page views, page traffic, number of watchers, frequency of edit requests, and prior history of vandalism.
- ...the protecting administrator is inactive or has not responded to you in several days.
If you cannot locate your request, make sure to check the request archives to see if it's been moved there. Only requests that have been recently answered will still be listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please add an edit request to the talk page of the protected page before adding an edit request here
Requests for specific edits should be made on the talk page of the protected article. You can create an edit request below only if the talk page is also protected, preventing you from adding a request there.
- You may add the appropriate template (
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}) to the article's talk page if you would like to request an edit be made. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - For edit requests being made due to the editor having a conflict of interest with the article subject (see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used instead of the others listed above. - Requests to move pages that are currently move-protected should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not on this page.
- This page is not for holding discussions regarding content. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit that you wish to be performed.
Otherwise, this is the correct place to use in order to add an edit request if you are unable to add one to the article's talk page. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to properly add a request.
Change the reported number of killed in the Gaza Strip from 70,668 to 70,654. The source cited for the existing 70,668 number actually says 70,654. Change the reported number of wounded in the Gaza Strip from 171,152+ to 171,095. The source cited for the existing 171,152+ number actually says 171,095. XXRobloxGod52961XX (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 3 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC) |
| 1 template-protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
|---|
Account creator |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have been editing since 2020 and have over 60 articles. Since November, I have created over 17+ clean pages (see [[1]]) and helped get JM Ibarra to Good Article status. I also recently expanded six drafts by other users that were accepted through AfC. I know I had two articles that were nominated for deletion back in November, but I know better now, so I've been super careful when creating articles since then. Given my current volume of work, I think having autopatrolled rights would really help save the New Page Patrol team some time. ACROM12 [TALK] 02:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I would like to work on automatically clearing some of the almost 50k Category:Pages using infobox musical artist with associated acts backlog. Specifically, there are many pages that have the "associated acts" parameter listed, but no value set. I would like to build a regex that finds these instances and removes the deprecated parameter, reducing the backlog to only those pages where a value is specified and actually require editor intervention. If it matters, I have a computer science degree and have worked in software development for 20+ years. ⚙️ WidgetKid 🙈🙉🙊 05:32, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting autowikibrowser rights to add numerous links to articles, mainly WP:SCR related. KerbHopper (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
I have now created an account but I have made many edits from IP address and temporary account before. This is the most recent. Dragon italiano (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Ram Surya jaishi (talk) 19:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
I think I'm qualified to for this أبو علاء العلوي (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am requesting an extension of the NPP user right. I've had it for the tailend of 2025, and feel like I've been able to get good work done, and would love to be able to help with the Jan-Feb '26 backlog drive. Jcgaylor (talk) 00:42, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I have been editing for over an year, and have participated in significant AfDs and myself having created more than 40+ articles. I also want to participate in the upcoming January–February New Pages Patrol backlog drive due to which I'm requesting this. WinKyaw (talk) 17:53, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
I received the invite a while ago. Now I'd like to help with the upcoming backlog drive. Poirot09 (talk) 11:15, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Want to participate in backlog drive, previously approved in August 2025. –DMartin 21:30, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
I want to participate in the drive and I feel I would be very valuable to it. Regards, a most likely very cozy Cooldood5555 ✈️ (let's talk) 22:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
I was a New Page Reviewer for the last backlog drive and I'd like to do so again for the coming backlog drive. I participated at WP:Articles for deletion for the last eight months. I was previously approved on a short-term basis in September. —🌊PacificDepths (talk) 23:00, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
I am interested in working on new pages and helping with the backlog. I have done quite a lot of work with PROD and some AfD. I have also started creating articles. Dualpendel (talk) 05:45, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I am interested to reduce the backlog. I know it's a heavy duty. However, I am expecting a trial period. SaTnamZIN (talk) 09:11, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I've been editing for a few years now and am hoping to help out in the upcoming New Pages Patrol Backlog Drive. Uffda608 (talk) 13:19, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I came to know that the backlog is quite big. so, I decided to volunteer. I’ve been learning NPR procedures and have experience writing and expanding articles on fish and other species. My understanding of notability guidelines can help in reviewing, and I would also participate in the upcoming January–February backlog drive. Thank you! Rtpaz 18:38, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
I think I satisfy the minimum requirements and am eager to participate in the Backlog Clearance drive for Jan-Feb. Kingsacrificer (talk) 21:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for well over a decade, and have experience with new pages, as I have created many new articles. I have also written several good articles and one featured article, and have matured greatly since I first started editing regularly as a teenager. As such, I would like to contribute to clearing the backlog at NPP. Bneu2013 (talk) 00:54, 31 December 2025 (UTC) Bneu2013 (talk) 00:54, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
I would like to have the new page reviewer permission permanently. I exceed the criteria for having the new page reviewer permission, and I am interested in reviewing new articles for Articles for Creation, articles that need to be reviewed, and redirects that need to be reviewed. Since I was granted the new page reviewer permission temporarily, I have helped review redirects and Articles for Creation. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC) Z. Patterson (talk) 01:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello I have had my account for over one year and seven months, I have over 2200 edits, and I have participated in nearly 800 AfDs and have a accuracy rate that ranges between 90% to 96%. I would like to next contribute to Wikipedia by assessing pages waiting to be reviewed. Thank you! Agnieszka653 (talk) 03:24, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’m interested on page reviewer role. I have done 1400 edits and 90 days old. Approve me if I’m eligible. Nicxie99 (talk) 05:19, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request New Page Reviewer right. I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time and have gained experience in creating, improving, and maintaining articles across different topics. Over time, I have developed a solid understanding of core Wikipedia policies, including notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), and the use of reliable sources (WP:RS) and I would like to help reduce the New Pages Patrol backlog by reviewing new articles carefully, identifying issues early, and supporting new editors with constructive feedback where needed. I believe I can make a positive contribution to the NPR team. Moly Roy (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights to assist with reviewing articles in the New Pages Feed and helping reduce the backlog. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s core content policies, including notability, verifiability, neutral point of view and can identify common issues in new articles. I will review pages carefully and help ensure new content meets Wikipedia’s standards. Dinitrify (talk) 00:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
I have been an editor for over a year, and have a good grasp on creating new articles and therefore feel I can help with the backlog by reviewing new pages. Nyxion303💬 Talk 04:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I already do a fair bit of recent changes review, and tend to look at the pending changes whenever they happen (since they have a rather noticeable highlighted bit.) It'd be convenient to be able to approve them, since I'm already looking at them. I think my edit history shows that I can recognize what is/isn't vandalism. radioactOlive(she/it)(talk) 02:07, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
I am an active editor familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. I am requesting pending changes reviewer rights so I can assist with reviewing edits efficiently and help maintain article quality by accepting constructive contributions and rejecting inappropriate ones. Abni (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have been quite active in the recent changes patrol recently, and I've been quite successful. I've notified editors after almost every revert I've made. I'd like rollback permissions to be able to use tools like AntiVandal so I can apply my anti-vandalism skills fairly but efficiently. Framl (talk) 21:46, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I have lots of experience patrolling Recent Changes. I always warn editors when reverting their edits, vandalistic or not. I have ~7000 edits and am already an AFC/NPP and pending changes reviewer. I would like rollback to use more advanced tools like AntiVandal which require rollback when doing recent changes patrolling. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks, thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk | contributions 02:14, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights signed, Kvinnen (talk) 04:41, 29 December 2025 (UTC) Rollback would be useful for me as I am constantly patrolling recent changes to undo unhelpful edits. I would love to experiment with more efficient tools to revert unconstructive edits, see if those edit summaries (in other AV tools) are more descriptive etc. Currently, I like RedWarn for my purposes, but if better options exist, I would like to familiarize myself with those to be more productive. Thank you for your consideration. signed, Kvinnen (talk) 04:41, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
I, I use Nookipedia, request this right as it will help me fight vandalism. I can prove my history of fighting vandalism, as I always use the Recent Changes to patrol new edits as they come in. Not only that, I also warn users for vandalism, and I report users to Wikipedia:AIV for vandalism after final warning. I can deternime vandalism within seconds and revert it. Also, I review the edit filter log, and issue warnings for it. The edit filter log is useful because a vandal can make a terrible edit and get caught, and make a less bad edit and evade the edit filter. Seeing this can quickly identify vandals, so I do it. I have made a custom RC patrol setting: [5]. I have also received a message from an experienced user to request rollback, making it easier to revert bad changes. User_talk:I_use_Nookipedia#Fighting vandalism. I hope I have demonstrated my ability for this user group. Also, my account is EXTENDED CONFIRMED. 🍃 I use Nookipedia 😊 (talk page) ✈️ 17:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
Hi, my TE right is about to expire. I've used TE quite often, e.g. Module:Wide image, and it would make sense to have it permanently. Fixing dark mode is definitely going to take a while, and there's a lot to work on, e.g. Template:Yes. —Matrix ping mewhen u reply (t? - c) 11:38, 31 December 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer |
Immediate requests
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 29 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 28 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 3 |
Deletion
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 552 |
| Templates for deletion | 250 |
| Categories for deletion | 305 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 35 |
| All redirects for discussion | 505 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 22 |
| Possible copyright violations | 18 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 118 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 6 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 8 |
Image copyright problems
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 349 |
| Unknown copyright status | 17 |
| Unknown source | 56 |
| No non-free use rationale | 4 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 12 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 61 |
Page protection
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,280 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 460 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,117 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,128 | 0.48 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,415 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,321 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 43,404 | 0.61 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,970 | 0.17 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 566,813 | 7.97 |
| All articles lacking sources | 39,497 | 0.56 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 26 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 516,404 | 7.26 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,913 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 108,336 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 338,660 | 4.76 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 140 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 16 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles proposed for merging | 808 | 0.01 |
| All articles proposed for splitting | 848 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
| Stub categories | 21,268 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 191 | 0 |
| All orphaned articles | 56,111 | 0.79 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 1,730 | 0.02 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,871 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,630 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,901 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 284 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 3,221 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,661 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 16 |
| All articles to be expanded | 52,957 |
Special pages
| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |