Jump to content

User:Gazimoff/Bookmarks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main
Main
   
Talk to me
Talk to me
   
Mentoring
Mentoring
   
About me
About me
   
Awards
Awards
   
Articles I've worked on
Articles I've worked on
   
Bookmarks & Sandboxes
Bookmarks & Sandboxes
   
Archive
Archive
   
Gallery
Gallery
   
Email me
Email me
 
                                     


Workstack, bookmarks, sandboxes and admin panels.


Current workstack

Priority Task name Location Comments Progress
1 RfA Review WP:RREV Complete Reflect section of review 50%.
2 Admin Coaching/Editor coaching proposal User:Gazimoff/Coaching proposal Complete initial draft Approx 50% complete, needs further detail.
3 Get World of Warcraft to GA World of Warcraft Incorporate changes from peer review, slim down further 70%
4 Get World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade to GA World of Warcraft: The Burning Crusade Currently working on reception section 20% complete
5 Complete essay on Clue theory User:Gazimoff/Clue theory Build premise, see if it's feasible 10%
6 Add mroe parameters and options to welcome username warn template Template:Welcome-name Scope/design 10%

Sandboxes

  • No current sandboxes

Videogame bookmarks

Admin bookmarks

  • 1

Admin dashboard

Admin dashboard


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 60
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 86
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 13
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 192
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 1
Candidates for speedy deletion 11
Open sockpuppet investigations 92
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 7
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Other candidates 2

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: As soon as protection expired the page has been under one purpose ip attacks [[1]], [[2]], [[3]], I am asking for indefinite semi protection Theonewithreason (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: User:Yukitanooki is repeatedly adding non-free screenshot to the article. 0x0a (talk) 07:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Not strictly within the Arab–Israeli conflict area. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. Related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel claims 85% of Qunietra. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk · contribs) 07:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – This doesn't receive a huge amount of traffic or vandalism but it is highly relevant to the WP:ARBPIA CTOP and should probably be protected. Thanks in advance!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:13, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 11:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Hi, I am Sandra Bongjoh. I have a page on wikipedia that is already visible on google and in addition to it my page on wikipedia will have more sources to prove me as a famous person but the sources will not appear right now. I would like to know if you can put a lock to prevent vandalism on this page, and I will be the only person editing the page. (Redacted) Bye, I am looking forward to hearing from you soon, Stay safe and healthy, Sandra

50.222.21.178 (talk) 15:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

No such page exists. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not free webhosting; pages are not "owned" the the subjects. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:54, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent increase in vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Releasing tomorrow, the film's lead actor has a strong fan base who are vandalising this article. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP keep editing UK, Éire, DACH and Italia's launch date to mid 2025 without source John123521t c 16:16, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Skitash (talk) 16:19, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP inserting reverse TCP attack link (you click on it, your computer doesn't fight it because you clicked on it), requesting increase in page protection Snokalok (talk) 16:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

I removed it, the IP reinserted it from a different address, I removed it again, they inserted it again. I am now convinced that this is a malicious attempt to insert malware. Snokalok (talk) 16:41, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Pls. see also the IP activity at The_White_Lotus_season_3. Two IPs have attempted to link to a download at the top of the article. Patrick (talk) 17:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
and 1923 (TV series) Snokalok (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:56, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Like in many biographies of famous footballers, masses of IPs inserting "he is the greatest" or similar- FMSky (talk) 17:00, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection due to frequent vandalism / edit warring. MSD50 (talk) 17:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Sush150 (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥  17:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suspected LTA or socking as of late. JayCubby 18:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Unprotection: Redirect was protected years ago. It now leads to a broken anchor. RanDom 404 (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

@Bearcat: as protecting admin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I think the section should be restored, which would fix the problem of the broken anchor. The section was deleted by a sock, then never restored before the article was protected. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Unprotection: No longer needs protection. @HangingCurve:. RanDom 404 (talk) 13:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

HangingCurve is no longer an admim. @RanDom 404: Why do you think the article doesn't need protection anymore? Lectonar (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Unprotection: No edits since 2018 so protection could be lowered at least. Could use a retarget to List of films about the Titanic, the primary subject. RanDom 404 (talk) 13:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

@RanDom 404: I suppose you mean Titanic (film), which has no edits since 2018 since it is fully protected. Also, it is already a redirect to Titanic (disambiguation)#Films. Why would we need to unprotect the redirect? Lectonar (talk) 13:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

4 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:MultiLicenceWithCC-By-All-IntEng (request) 2025-04-09 06:19 Fully protected (log) Protected by Schneelocke on 2005-08-07: "Licenses don't and in fact shouldn't change."
Template:MultiLicenceWithCC-BySA-Any-Inteng (request) 2025-04-09 06:20 Fully protected (log) Protected by Schneelocke on 2005-08-07: "Licenses don't and in fact shouldn't change."
Template:MultiLicenseWithCC-BySA-Any (request) 2025-04-09 06:20 Fully protected (log)
MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (request) 2025-04-09 18:20 MediaWiki page (log) Unprotected by Cyberpower678 on 2018-11-20: "Breaks the RfX bot."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:24, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
14 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-02-03 08:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Infobox martial artist (request) 2025-02-05 21:13 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2025-02-12 04:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Infobox school district (request) 2025-03-01 04:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Video game reviews (request) 2025-03-28 10:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 02:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions"
Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox sports league (request) 2025-04-02 04:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:IETF RFC (request) 2025-04-06 03:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by The Anome on 2017-05-30: "Highly visible template: ... but not an extreme case"
Template:Code (request) 2025-04-06 18:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Infobox drug (request) 2025-04-08 00:36 Template-protected (log) From Template:Drugbox: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:College athlete recruit end (request) 2025-04-09 05:00 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


RFA= Requests for adminship

RFP= Requests for permissions

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Dracophyllum is a user that has been creating lists and articles largely related to the flora of New Zealand and the surrounding landmasses. Several of these have been brought to GA level and at least one to FA (Dracophyllum fiordense) from scratch. They have been around for a little while; their works are well-developed in sandboxes prior to publishing in mainspace, and need little attention once published. Reconrabbit 01:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

I want to be active on English Wikipedia more. I am a trusted global user. So I want the flag of this user group. Janabaevazizbek (talk) 11:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

 Not done @Janabaevazizbek: this permission is for users who create lots of articles on this wiki. You can still help out and create articles here without it because it's only there to reduce patrollers' workload; it doesn't have any effect on the user. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:53, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

I have created 35+ articles so far, I am trying to clean up the Roman-Persian wars topic currently, I noticed that there are many articles to create there. This is why I think this permission would be relevant.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 18:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


Confirmed

[edit]

Gulu Monteiro EDP

[edit]

Reason for requesting goes here I am an experienced theater director creating a Wikipedia article about my work that has been reviewed multiple times by AfC reviewers. I need to upload several low-resolution scans of historical press articles under fair use to support the notability of the subject. My account is more than 4 days old and has over 10 edits. Please consider granting confirmed user status so I can upload files to the English Wikipedia. Thank you! Gulu Monteiro EDP (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Page mover

[edit]

I wish to assist at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. I also close WP:RM discussions from time to time and this tool will save me from having to do a technical request every time. I meet the WP:PMCRITERIA. GMH Melbourne (talk) 04:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Occasionally move pages and sometimess if a title is not needed I don't need to mark it with db-g7. Would be much easier to move pages without leaving a redirect behind if needed. RanDom 404 (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

 Not done per lack of demonstrated need and moving experience. You have done 20 moves, 2 of which are from redlinks. (WP:G7 only applies to move redirects when there were no other substantive contributors to either page, so please just continue to use {{db-g7}} if you need to delete a redirect left over from a page that you placed at a bad title.)
(As an aside, there is no need to delete a move redirect from draftspace to mainspace, nor to tag it as {{R from draft}}. The default {{R from move}} will suffice, and editing a redirect makes it harder to move the target to the redirect (if needed).) JensonSL (SilverLocust) 06:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I've been editing for a long time and understand Wikipedia's policies and goals. I especially like to help out at pages which have a lot of enthusiastic edits by knowledgeable people who might not understand Wikipedia's format and goals, making them perfect candidates for pending changes protection.

I think pending changes reviewer rights would be the perfect way to help separate the wheat from the chaff and help our newest editors participate and make a difference while maintaining our high standards. Bruhpedia (talk) 20:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

I have read the WP:PCCRITERIA and I believe that I meet them. I sometimes see pending edits waiting for approval on articles, and I believe that I could do this job myself. wojtekpolska1013 [talk page] 09:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 29 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 09:40, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm requesting PCR to help out with reviewing pending changes I notice when patrolling recent changes. I have read and am familiar with the policies. I'd like to think I would make a good reviewer. LightlySeared (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

I recently began using the WP:RCPS script to rollback vandalism. However I'm currently unable to mark edits as patrolled when I determine they are benign or productive. I'm guessing I need this permission to do that? Could I be added? Cheers, Patrick (talk) 15:49, 9 April 2025 (UTC)


Rollback

[edit]

I have taken up patrolling recent changes and clear vandalism prevension / sourceless BLP-edits in en-wiki too. I have enough experience of the tool through fi-wiki, where I am a rollbacker, pending changes reviewer and ”page stabilzer” (I think the group closest to it here was called editor?). I know I have under 200 edits too now, but my interest at the time here is vandalism prevention which is hard and takes multiple edits (causes spam in recent changes) without rollback-tool. I would ask for sysops to look at my well trusted global status and experience. Thank you! Osmo Lundell (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 84 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 21:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
@Osmo Lundell: Twinkle's red "vandalism" button should revert consecutive edits by the same user in the same way that rollback does. It appears when you view the diff (noting that you have Twinkle enabled). Have you tried doing that? – JensonSL (SilverLocust) 04:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Hey! Thanks for metting me know, I thought that using that button would need the rollback user group. Good to know if it works just like that for everyone! I would still leave my request pending, because rollback is still useful from the recent changes view etc. --Osmo Lundell hey 07:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
 Not done for the bot. With some more experience, please come back and request again as I have no doubt that it will be approved. Malinaccier (talk) 14:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll return after 200+ edits in mainspace! --Osmo Lundell hey 15:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I am requesting rollback rights to help combat vandalism and disruptive edits more effectively. I have been patrolling recent changes for the past 30 days, focusing on identifying and reverting vandalism, test edits, and other unconstructive changes. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies, including WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, and WP:NPOV.

I really wanted to improve Wikipedia by my small contribution. I understand the importance of using rollback responsibly. This permission would allow me to respond more efficiently to inappropriate edits.

I want to also say that I made some silly mistakes in the starting of my patrolling. However, I learnt from them and make sure that they won't happen again. Such as reverting edits that are already reverted, that mistakes you can see on my past contributions.

Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if any additional information is needed. VortexPhantom Talk 07:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi,
Please any administrator review my request. I have already waited a lot, and now I likely to lose my patience too. Please get it done ASAP. It will encourage me to do more quality edits to Wikipedia and help it in improving. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 01:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 14:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for granting me this right. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

I would like to use rollback perms to more effectively fight vandals on Wikipedia, I am hoping to use Huggle to do this. 𝕟𝕪𝕖𝕦𝕓𝕚𝕞 (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 199 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 19:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 14:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

I'd like to request rollback rights to help fight vandalism more effectively. I've been actively reverting clear cases of vandalism using Twinkle. I have over 2000 edits and am familiar with relevant policies. Calmkelp talk 05:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done Malinaccier (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

I'd like to try some other counter-vandalism tools, such as AntiVandal, Huggle, and SWViewer, which require the rollback right to use. I've actively been patrolling recent changes for roughly 3-4 months and have consistently warned editors when reverting them. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Greetings, I’m an extended confirmed user, I am requesting for the rollback rights to help fight against vandalism and disruptive edits. I’m more active on recent changes feed and also new page feeds, I am familiar with WP:VANDALISM and I will love to help here. Best Regards (CP) 22:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

I have been editing constructively on the project for a few years now and would like to more effectively revert disruptive edits when I encounter them. I am familiar with Wikipedia's policies and understand the distinction between purely disruptive edits and edits that may be unhelpful but are made in good-faith. When reverting a new user's edits, I make sure to properly explain myself in an edit summary and leave a message on the relevant article's or user's talk page as appropriate, unless the user is obviously acting in bad faith and WP:DENY applies, in which case I report them to a relevant noticeboard. I have thoroughly read the WP:ROLLBACK instructions and will make sure to familiarize myself with the tools before using them, and avoid using the rollback tools when they are not appropriate and another reversion tool would be more suitable. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

I would like to request rollback permissions to help combat vandalism more effectively on Wikipedia, I have been reverting vandalism for a good amount of time from recent changes using twinkle and undo. Therefore I think rollback tool can help me to assist in identifying and reverting unconstructive edits efficiently. Imwin567 (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Template editor

[edit]

I am a decently experienced user who primarily works on sports-related articles. In this time, I've come across Template talk:College athlete recruit end which requires edits, but appears to have been abandoned, as my message from last year was never addressed. I have made edits within the sandbox, but don't expect them to be responded to. poketape (talk) 06:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:
  1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: ~4)
  2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~8700)
  3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 372)
  4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
  5. Red XN (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 1)
  6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0 (2 pending))
Primefac (talk) 08:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
 Not done for lack of need. Your two TPER requests have been live for all of two hours; they will eventually get responded to but the system is not by any stretch a rapid-response one. If you find yourself regularly needing to make edits to protected templates, please feel free to re-apply in the future. Primefac (talk) 08:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    Policies, processes etc

    Miscellaneous