Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians

Shortcuts

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Bands and musicians. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Bands and musicians|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Bands and musicians. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

Purge page cache

watch

Related deletion sorting

Bands and musicians

FyaVerse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty SEO/PR refs, other junk sources about a non-notable artist. The article lacks citations from reliable sources that provide significant, independent coverage. The subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines, as the existing references are primarily promotional or paid content. Tukšumi (talk) 00:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Bands and musicians, and Music. Tukšumi (talk) 00:01, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – FyaVerse is a notable reggae/dancehall artist with one consecutive HDP Music Award nomination (2025), a Billboard Argentina Hot 100 appearance, and one #1 song on Hype TV and one #10 on FiWi Choice. Notability is supported by reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novadorodney98 (talk • contribs)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 00:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Perlman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:03, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I think this talks about him [1] in the "Starshine" article, says "award winning", but that's all there seems to be about this person. Delete unless we can find more/better sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The barest mention in passing. Apparently, Perlman expressed interest in producing a CD for an obscure teen singing duo in 2007. There's no indication any such CD was ever produced. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:01, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whistle & Trick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, lack of categories, page looks untidy Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 07:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m still working on this. Apologies if I published this too early, I’m still learning. Please can it be kept, I’ll have references and tidy it within the next few hours. Is there a way to unpublish it but not delete it? Kwinky (talk) 08:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s a tip: create a draft page for the article(s) you’re working on. That way you can edit without the risk of deletion. You’ll be able to get sources, constantly check them to make sure they’re reliable sources (hint: sources leading to sites like Fandom aren’t reliable). Once you feel the page is ready you can submit it and wait for an admin to look over it. If the admin thinks that the page is good, it’ll be published. If the admin thinks it’s not good, the submission will be rejected. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate your help. I did edit some articles years ago and thought I would remember but I'm a bit rusty.

I've corrected the issues that you mentioned above in the published version and will continue to add more content in a draft version. While it is still a bit brief, is this enough to stop the current published version from being deleted?

(Please note that I have included a citation which links to Paul Kelly's official Instagram where he states who his daughters are as I have not been able to locate this information elsewhere. I understand while this is not ideal it can be acceptable in some circumstances.) Kwinky (talk) 11:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dipper Dalmatian I see you've edited the page too, thanks. It's now also been reviewed. In the circumstances, could we remove the "deletion" tag? Cheers Kwinky (talk) 01:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We can’t. Someone else has to do that. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 05:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dipper Dalmatian You are allowed to withdraw your nomination if you no longer believe the page should be deleted. Since no one else has yet supported deletion, the discussion could then be closed as a speedy keep. See WP:WITHDRAWN. MCE89 (talk) 06:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per criteria 3 based on the absence of a valid deletion rationale. Having no sources, lacking categories and looking untidy are not valid reasons for deletion, especially since none of these are true of the article anymore. I don't see any reason why this needed to be nominated for deletion just 15 minutes after it was created when it was clearly still being worked on.

In terms of notability, I don't often participate in music-related AfDs and don't have a strong view about notability in this case. But a nomination for an ARIA, which is generally considered to be Australia's most prominent music award, seems to me like a reasonable claim for notability under WP:NMUSICIAN criteria 8. MCE89 (talk) 11:29, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Cramer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was created by the subject's son in 2006 (edit: looks like Cramer edited his article a few times under Dylanrcramer12 (talk · contribs) and Dylanrcramer (talk · contribs)) and has survived for nineteen years with a single source – the subject's own website. I found two news articles on Dylan Cramer (one, two), but they do not mention any major works or accomplishments. The book Journeys to the Bandstand has a chapter on him and his father, but is unlikely to mention anything that would make him notable (or there would be other news sources reporting on it). Cramer appears to be a local Vancouver musician who does not satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, Music, and Canada. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as subject does not appear to meet any of the 12 criteria for WP:MUSICBIO. I searched newspapers.com as well and found many notices about upcoming performances and the like (mainly in Vancouver area) but I don't see any sigcov to support WP:BASIC either. Zzz plant (talk) 04:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is a close call because the musician has gained respect from other musicians, and that generated some basic coverage among afficionados, but unfortunately I must agree with the in-depth conclusions by the nominator and previous voter. There simply isn't enough with which to build an encyclopedic article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as well as the book chapter and news pieces highlighted by the nominator I found two staff-written album reviews at AllMusic here and here. Haven't done a full search yet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Orr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD, and that’s totally fine. But the de-PROD-der did so with summary that prompted me to do another cursory search, but still didn’t come up with anything tangible. My PROD statement Subject fails WP:NPOL and current sources do not help to qualify for WP:GNG still stands. I particularly went through the cited sources to find GNG-passable sources but yielded nothing. There are no sufficient independent sources that provide substantial coverage of the subject to establish the minimum GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Canada. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, and Photography. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Seems to be plenty of secondary source and independent media coverage to me. Article could use some work, but that is not grounds for deletion. RedBlueGreen93 23:43, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allegiance (American band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was created by a user who has the same name as one of the members of the group. Beyond that it doesn't appear like there's any reliable sources about this band. GamerPro64 18:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California. GamerPro64 18:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO and WP:COI issue. I can't tell whether the OP was a huge fan of the band or a band member himself. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:07, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: After searching, I can't find any reliable, third-party sources about this band. No indication of meeting WP:GNG and it doesn't seem like any verifiable sources exist. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 22:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I could not find any reliable, secondary sourcing. Best I found was an interview. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 23:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trish Doan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am the creator of this page. I have felt kinda guilty about this for a while because I think I did a terrible job at it. My reasons for deletion are as follows:

1. Most of the article is based on an web source from the Headbanging Moose, which I realise now is unverifiable/not an interview. In one recent search I found it was citing text from a Tumblr interview (alas that too was inaccessible). Either way; bad source, which makes up most of the article. Also, Hergirlrock and trishdoan.com are primary sources

2. Most of the reliable source coverage about Trish concerns her departure from the band in 2008, or her death in 2017. I feel both of these can be explained just as well in the Kittie band article or in other related articles (i.e. the documentary stuff)

3. When I made this page, I thought I was doing so primarily because I though Trish was an underrated bassist on Funeral for Yesterday and I wanted them to be known for other stuff outside of their struggles. In hindsight and in other words, I was trying to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. I am kinda more accepting of the fact that shit things do happen to people. I recognise the feelings I had at the time (aka when this was made; 2023) reflected my life situation which I didn't think I had a way out of at the time, and as such my edits were kinda projections of that mentality. I'm in a better place now (in part thanks to Funeral for Yesterday, actually) but I still feel as though I failed. If I made things worse, I am sorry.

// Chchcheckit (talk) 13:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, South Korea, and Canada. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:37, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Kittie. Thanks to the nominator for being honest. Per Wikipedia's rules for the notability of band members, evidence is needed that Trish Doan accomplished additional notable things outside of Kittie, but that just didn't happen. Info on her early bands and day jobs are fan trivia but don't pass the notability test. On the other hand, her achievements within Kittie, and sadly her death and how it affected the band, are Kittie-specific and can be adequately described at their article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Keep well sourced article. If the page cannot be kept, it should be redirected to Kittie. --Jax 0677 (talk) 09:49, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Macan Band

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability of the band is disputed as not enough significant coverage provided (yet). Norlk (talk) 13:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Iran. Skynxnex (talk) 16:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Course of Action

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence of notability. In my WP:BEFORE search, I couldn't find any significant coverage in reliable sources. Many of the sources are press releases, profile listings, social media posts and unreliable blogs. Doesn't meet WP:NMUSIC.

Also nominating the band's album and single articles for the same reasons:

Dark Before the Dawn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Treason (A Course of Action album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Rocklahoma (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Never There (A Course of Action song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Beautiful (A Course of Action song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Who We Are (A Course of Action song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
107 (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Frost 13:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Albums and songs. Frost 13:18, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This band while not achieving large mainstream success was very active for over 16 years with multiple albums, EP's, and singles. Also, this band participated in numerous large music festivals allover the United States that toured in support of various different mainstream acts. To delete such articles, especially of a group who was active for nearly two decades would be a great disservice. After all, is Wikipedia not an open-sourced community open for individuals to share their knowledge of something that others are not familiar with? I mean no disrespect to the individual who nominated this article for deletion, but I spent well over a week researching this artist to verify all these facts and sources to confirm all the information is factual. The lack of sources from major outlets is due to the fact the band has been inactive for nearly a decade and many sources are long gone and were not saved to the internet archive. But as stated I spent over a week combing through old videos and interviews from the band directly to confirm all the details were true and correct without positive or negative bias. I'm just a fan of music with a goal of preserving the history of artists and bands who left their mark on the industry, and though A Course of Action didn't make a historic mark like The Beatles or Michael Jackson, nearly two decades of activity and releases would be a tragedy to just forget about and label as non-noteworthy. Bruteforce7700 (talk) 22:30, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia has a different definition of notability for an article to be accepted - it largely falls on whether multiple reliable, independent, and significant sources exist or not. There doesn't seem to be any that discuss the band or its singles and albums significantly, and none of the sources in the articles contribute to notability:
A Course of Action: 24-7pressrelease.com, acourseofaction.com, airplaydirect.com, amazon.com, broadjam.com, cdbaby.com, crypticrock.com, discogs.com, facebook.com, youtube.com, myspace.com, spotify.com, iheart.com, hickoryrecord.com, mtsmanagementgroup.com, museboat.com, music2deal.com, muzicnotez.com, prweb.com, reverbnation.com, rockrevoltmagazine.com, sellaband.com, songs-that-should-be-mainstream.blogspot.com, sonicbids.com, sromag.wordpress.com, teenviewmusic.com, thehybridband.com, wsfairgrounds.com, backstagelosangeles.net, last.fm, musify.club, prlog.org, rockunderground.tv

Dark Before the Dawn: bandcamp.com, acourseofaction.com, cdbaby.com, crypticrock.com, museboat.com, apple.com, spotify.com, prostudiolive.net, 24-7pressrelease.com, amazon.com, backstagelosangeles.net, broadjam.com, discogs.com, last.fm, prlog.org, prweb.com, reverbnation.com, rockrevoltmagazine.com, shazam.com

Treason (A Course of Action album): acourseofaction.com, echo-asylum.com, reverbnation.com, rockrevoltmagazine.com, crypticrock.com, hickoryrecord.com, music.apple.com, musictalkers.com, myglobalmind.com, open.spotify.com, buffalochip.com, discogs.com, last.fm, prlog.org, prweb.com, setlist.fm, sonicbids.com, unratedmetal.com, youtube.com

Rocklahoma (EP): music.apple.com, musictalkers.com, open.spotify.com, switchbitchnoise.com, web.archive.org, reverbnation.com, acourseofaction.com, hickoryrecord.com, discogs.com, last.fm, prweb.com, sonicbids.com, unratedmetal.com

Never There (A Course of Action song): acourseofaction.com, reverbnation.com, rockrevoltmagazine.com, museboat.com, music.apple.com, open.spotify.com, songs-that-should-be-mainstream.blogspot.com, amazon.com, broadjam.com, discogs.com, last.fm, prweb.com

Beautiful (A Course of Action song): musictalkers.com, myglobalmind.com, spotify.com, switchbitchnoise.com, reverbnation.com, acourseofaction.com, unratedmetal.com, 24-7pressrelease.com, buffalochip.com, discogs.com, last.fm, prlog.org, prweb.com, sonicbids.com

Who We Are (A Course of Action song): acourseofaction.com, echo-asylum.com, reverbnation.com, rockrevoltmagazine.com, broadjam.com, spotify.com, 24-7pressrelease.com, discogs.com, last.fm, prweb.com, sonicbids.com, unratedmetal.com, youtube.com

107 (song): open.spotify.com, web.archive.org, discogs.com, last.fm, prlog.org, prweb.com, reverbnation.com, sonicbids.com

AllMusic [2][3][4], is reliable but is not significant, as it contains nothing more than a credit listing.
Frost 06:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Iren Dimitrova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pianist that fails WP:GNG. No in-depth sources found. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The page currently has a self-published source and [https://web.archive.org/web/20150528143345/http://www.ubmd.org/static_info.php?id=18 a list of her awards. Checked Google News and archive.org; found only passing mentions. LastJabberwocky (talk) 10:03, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Bands and musicians, Women, and Bulgaria. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jauhari Johar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined twice at WP:AFC but moved to mainspace by articles subject. Submission is about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines. Theroadislong (talk) 19:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, and Malaysia. Theroadislong (talk) 19:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cassidy (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent notability outside of the band Antigone Rising. The majority of the page is unsourced solo work. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, California, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:38, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: There are bunch of independent sources on her with SIGCOV, but not all of them may be reliable. This, this, and this for SIGCOV. And these ones for individual claims: [5] and [6]. Only searched Google news. LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep while this article has enough sources to meet WP:BASIC, it's in desparate need of a re-write to remove promotional language and non-cited/non-verifiable content. Nnev66 (talk) 18:22, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tian Boothe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person. A lot of the sources are press releases and blogs, and the reliability of AllHipHop, although listed on WP:A/S based on one comment in 2008, has been questioned multiple times.[7][8][9] The article creator appears to have a history of creating articles with COI and paid editing issues. Frost 13:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, and Jamaica. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Svartner (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom ,Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:13, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Von Grey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never signed to a major label only self-released a handful of EPs and never a full album. The group did some tours as support act but never internationally as far as I can gather. Fails the notability guidelines for WP:MUSIC. Karst (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Karst (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the page was created by a staff member of Red Light Management who had the band on their roster at the time. See this Billboard article where she is mentioned. Karst (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Blatant advertising and COI issue. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Cohen

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Julie Cohen (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability reqs for WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:ENTERTAINER, or WP:MUSICBIO. scant third party coverage (most of which copies the bio from their band website), no major acting roles, no significant contributions to music. I tried to add sources/improve the page before filing this AfD. I can't see a reason to keep this page. Puppies937 (talk) 04:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree per above reasoning. LastJabberwocky (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacking SIGCOV. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 04:41, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nadeeka Guruge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the requirements of WP:ANYBIO / WP:MUSICBIO. Lacks significant coverage of the individual in multiple reliable sources. Apart from the Sunday Observer article, the others are just mentions in passing. It has also been extensively edited by, what appears to be, the individual the subject of the article - WP:SELFPROMOTION. Has been tagged as not meeting WP:GNG, since February 2016, without any substantive improvements to the referencing/sourcing. Dan arndt (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Sri Lanka. Dan arndt (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: In addition to the concerns about the possible autobiographical edits, 11 of the 16 sources appear to be dead links and bring up a 404 error when trying to access them. Based on the titles, these sources may follow a similar pattern described later. Most of the remaining ones are either plot summaries of a movie that lists the subject in the cast (source 8 for example) or articles discussing a movie and listing the subject as a music director (with no further mention or coverage of the subject), such as in sources 9 and 10. The first links that appear when doing a search of the subject include profiles on Facebook and YouTube, his official site, and a few other similar articles similarly providing a passing mention but not significant coverage of him (such as him performing at an event). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 07:58, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article has since been updated with 36 reliable sources, most of which are now accessible and provide substantial coverage beyond passing mentions. Maduka Jayalath (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even after rewrite. The sources provided are mostly IMDB. While there are newspapers, they appear to be excessively promotional and making outlandish statements. For these reasons I do not believe WP:GNG is met. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 13:25, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been revised with a stronger set of 36 sources, focusing on reliable newspaper coverage with less emphasis on IMDb or promotional tone. Maduka Jayalath (talk) 06:07, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has won notable awards and these sources here and here are significant coverage in reliable sources in my opinion Atlantic306 (talk) 21:56, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
First source looks ok (i believe this is the source mentioned in nom) but second source is a thinly disguised press release that is not significant coverage of the subject. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 05:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The updated article now includes 36 references, many of which provide substantial coverage of the subject from reliable, independent sources. I believe this demonstrates notability more clearly. Maduka Jayalath (talk) 06:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been thoroughly updated with a broader range of reliable sources, including citations from established Wikipedia articles and recognized newspapers. These additions aim to enhance the article’s credibility and depth. A fresh review would be appreciated. Maduka Jayalath (talk) 06:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Wilson (soprano)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is mainly based on bios published by the subject's employers or written by their PR management. The one independent source, Herkimer Times Telegram, is predominantly about another artist and the subject is only briefly mentioned in passing in the latter half of a single sentence. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:51, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Bands and musicians, Germany, Connecticut, Iowa, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:22, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep her New York concert debut was covered by the Times[10] and I'm fairly confident we'll be able to find other sources. Jahaza (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian reviews[11][12], feature on Vancouver production[13]. Jahaza (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another review: 2004 in the Vancouver Sun[14], Vancouver Sun profile ahead of the same production[15], Washington Post concert review[16], another WaPo review[17], 2008 review of Vancouver production in Opera Canada[18], a German review from 1999[19]. I suspect that the Dusseldorf newspaper has a lot more reviews, since she was a principal there. Jahaza (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Delete. I don't think that the lukewarm sources cited here justify notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:21, 14 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

@Xxanthippe I'm confused. Did you mean keep or delete? Your edit summary marked your vote as delete, and your comment seems to support that; but then you voted keep in bold.4meter4 (talk) 23:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the alert. I am so sorry for my carelessness. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Keep as per the reliable sources coverage identified by Jahaza including reviews by the New York Times, Washington Post, The Globe & Mail and others, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Hound

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from passing mentions in the Pitchfork articles, there doesn't seem to be any significant coverage for this individual. WP:MUSICBIO not met. Frost 16:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:38, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Worthy (record producer)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The problem with this article is the same as when it was deleted the last time: almost all of the sources are not journalism but thinly veiled promotional material dressed up to look like "interviews," which are simply softball question templates filled in by the artist himself.

For example, this source is written by Lenell Johnson, whom Allmusic lists as Worthy's A&R rep. Another source, Singersoom, doesn't even mask its identity as a paid PR platform, as it has an "Advertise your music" banner on its site. Even an article in a source which might be thought of as reliable, The Source, reads like a PR blog post and claims, like the rest of Worthy's PR material, that he has been nominated for three Grammy awards, which I have not been able to corroborate with a WP:RS. This article in "Elevator" magazine is an article clearly tagged "promoted" and whose author is listed as "Advertiser."

I see no indication that Worthy has received any in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources that will satisfy WP:MUSICBIO, despite the "citation bombing" from Allmusic, Discogs, Spotify, iTunes, and IMDB. Rift (talk) 19:19, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Georgia (U.S. state), and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dijon Carruthers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing but mentions. No in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. Restoring the redirect as an ATD would probably be the best course. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:53, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Megadeth. He is only ever mentioned as present in early histories of the band and received no media coverage of his own. He left the band (twice) long before they became notable without him, and if he inspired some lyrics that is merely fan trivia. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 21:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OGOGO

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original 2008 argument for keeping this article was based upon the fact they released two albums on major labels. They released albums on Innova Records and III Records, but III Records has notability issues itself, so I don’t see how it can upholster another article.

Also, there are few sources I can find. Google came back with All About Jazz, but that’s a database. They had one passing mention in a book from 2000. Otherwise, I’d say they’re unnotable. Roasted (talk) 22:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California. Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Further research: I don't believe it should’ve been kept the first time. The argument was that they released an album under a major label (Innova Recordings). The article itself doesn’t source that fact. The only place on the internet I could find stating such a fact was on Discogs.com. Also, Innova's website doesn’t know of an Ogogo.

Lugnuts argued that they released on two notable labels, but I couldn’t find sources for III Records, and placed a PROD tag accordingly. It should also be noted that Armatist participated in the deletion discussion. Armatist was the creator of the Ogogo and III Records article. Roasted (talk) 02:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected, their website mentions Ogogo. Roasted (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this one just screams Wikipedia:Delete the junk, it's a nothing-burger from the early days of Wikipedia and lacks any notable coverage. Irruptive Creditor (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uriel (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion because the subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for music-related topics (see WP:NMUSIC). There are no significant independent and reliable sources that provide in-depth coverage of the band. The existing references are either primary, trivial mentions, or lack the depth required to establish encyclopedic notability. Without substantial third-party coverage, the article fails to demonstrate that the subject is notable enough for a standalone Wikipedia page. The article sounds more like advertising than a biography. Atisnakebite (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:12, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. Shellwood (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been in good standing for 19 years. Just because this editor is not familiar with, not a fan of Canterbury Scene progressive rock, that's no justification for unilaterally deleting an established Wikipedia entry. Rcarlberg (talk) 02:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Longevity and false consensus. Also, this same article has already been deleted in different languages! Atisnakebite (talk) 05:49, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Here the book source on both Uriel and Arzachel (page 28) and and this book. Goldmine (magazine) has three articles touching on them: [20], [21], [22]. Together these sources are more than enough. LastJabberwocky (talk) 08:47, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~: None of those articles adds to the biography. “Top Albums that changed my life” or “Tracks that feats Steve Hillage” are not encyclopedic. As I said: “The existing references are either primary, trivial mentions, or lack the depth required to establish encyclopedic notability”. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention – WP:SIGCOV. Their album or band did not make an impact in the music industry. Atisnakebite (talk) 05:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Further RSMUSIC coverage available: a staff bio on Allmusic: [23], a staff review on Allmusic: [24] stating "one of the real delights of late '60s heavy psych", and an album review in Melody Maker from 1969: [25]. Also, in 2020, their album was described in Record Collector, including as one of the rarest and most collectible records in the UK: [26]. ResonantDis_tortion 21:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I work for Universal Music Group and I can confirm that a “staff biography” on AllMusic should not be considered as a reliable source as it’s completely easy to become a staff contributor, and when artists submit their content to AllMusic they can ask for a biography update or submit a biography summary copy by emailing Xperi. You can read more about it here: https://www.allmusic.com/product-submissions !!!! Atisnakebite (talk) 05:32, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That link clearly states articles can be submitted but will be used as research material, and the "editorial policy is that all reviews, synopses, and biographies must be written by their staff and freelance contributors". Furthermore, with the nomination you have now !voted three times; please strike two of them. ResonantDis_tortion 06:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, to become a contributor on AllMusic is easy. There's a difference between news/interviews and the artist page metadata at AllMusic. See WP:ALLMUSIC - The news and interviews are written by their staff writers, and the artist pages can be edited by anyone. It's the same as someone writing an article about a band based on their Last.FM or Genius biography. Atisnakebite (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as plenty of reliable sources coverage has been identified in this discussion such as Melody Maker, Goldmine (magazine), book sources, and AllMusic so WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
AllMusic is not a reliable source: WP:ALLMUSIC

Melody Maker, Goldmine (magazine) are trivial mentions: WP:SIGCOV

_

There is no encyclopedic, and the arguments so far are WP:BIASED. I want to see if anybody can prove that this band is notable and their article is not just a WP:ADS written years ago! Atisnakebite (talk) 00:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blutonium Boy

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blutonium is German DJ. The article was nominated for deletion in 2008 and kept based on this source, which seems notable but doesn't have WP:SIGCOV. The other sources I found are: [27], [28], [29]. This self-published book mentions him in a list of hardstyle djs. German Music Archive doesn't give anything. It feels notable but notable sources couldn't be found. LastJabberwocky (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Germany. LastJabberwocky (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This album review, available via TWL, calls the subject a "biggie in the genre". One of his remixes got a positive review in Muzik. Appears to have an extensive discography as seen here. Tending to agree with the nominator, the subject "feels notable" but this still needs better sourcing to meet MUSICBIO. ResonantDis_tortion 18:55, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Priyansh Jadav

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indian singer who doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines. A WP:BEFORE search doesn't come up with any WP:SIGCOV. The is also a possible COI. The article was turned down at AfC several times, after which the creator move it to mainspace. John B123 (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Gujarat. John B123 (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The article is about a singer who has been active since 2023 and has coverage on IMDb, YouTube, and Instagram. His performances, especially in dual male-female vocals and yodeling, have gained attention and are verifiable. References are being added to meet Wikipedia’s standards. The article is improving and shows potential for notability.

--13StudioPresent (talk) 06:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't think I have to say this, but IMDb, YouTube (with exception for interviews as an additional source), and Instagram are not reliable sources. Nothing comes out in the Google news nor on the ProQuest. LastJabberwocky (talk) 12:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom , Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Subject is a upcoming singer not notable at this point a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Tim Kinsella. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:53, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Everyoned

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Everyoned is a supergroup that released one album in 2004. They have a micro article, and the only source could find is this. Two bandmates have a wiki page, so "Everyoned" can be redirected to one of them. LastJabberwocky (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and United States of America. LastJabberwocky (talk) 18:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Tim Kinsella, where the group is already mentioned and the found source in the nom could be used; a search on Newspapers.com turned up a couple hits in concert listings which confirm their existence, but nowhere near the SIGCOV required. Nothing on Google either. Jordano^5³ 19:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with redirecting Everyoned per above reasoning. LastJabberwocky (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Daniel Saks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a writer and musician, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for writers or musicians. As always, writers and musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to pass certain defined notability criteria verified by WP:GNG-worthy coverage about them and their work in reliable sources independent of themselves -- for example, you don't make a writer notable enough for Wikipedia by referencing his books to themselves as circular metaverification of their own existence, you make a writer notable enough for Wikipedia by referencing his books to third-party media coverage about them, such as professional book reviews and/or evidence that they've won or been nominated for major literary awards.
But this essentially just states that his work exists, without documenting anything that would meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:AUTHOR criteria, and it's referenced almost entirely to primary sourcing that isn't support for notability, such as his own podcast and the books metaverifying themselves. The only secondary source cited here at all is a (deadlinked but recoverable) Tiny Desk Concert, which just briefly namechecks his participation in the surrounding text without saying anything substantive about him, and thus isn't sufficient to get him over GNG all by itself.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:56, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moderate Keep: It already has bare minimum of sources + this source from Jewish Telegraphic Agency. I seen worse cases where there's nothing to be done, and the deletion is reserved for these cases. LastJabberwocky (talk) 12:46, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the nomination. He hasn’t yet achieved enough coverage or notoriety to merit keeping the article. Go4thProsper (talk) 20:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:48, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Suggestibles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A comedy group that improvises musicals. It's an uncited biography of living people, which failed speedy in 2007 for lack of independent reliable sources, so I'm going through this process. LastJabberwocky (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Theatre, and United Kingdom. LastJabberwocky (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks like they still exist according to their website[30] but the only coverage they've received is an interview on a local website in 2019[31]. Unless better sources can be found, they don't meet wp:gng. Orange sticker (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:MILL improv group with very little press coverage. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: limited amount of mentions in Gnews above, but sourcing is lacking. We simply don't have enough to show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 20:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lots of hits with sustained secondary coverage available via Proquest, including bylined article in a national newspaper stating this group is one of the "hottest comedy tickets in the north-east". See for example: Guardian, 2007, Evening Chronicle 2004, Journal 2010, Northern Echo 2011. ResonantDis_tortion 09:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi, can you drop a couple of more things we can draw from these articles. I still figuring out the best way to find sources for free, and your source isn't free showing me only a preview :). The only things I got are: "Newcastle-based" and one source says they are in-demand. LastJabberwocky (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Hi @LastJabberwocky You can get free access to a variety of databases, including Proquest, via the Wikipedia Library. You need 500 edits and to have had an account for 6 months: Wikipedia:The_Wikipedia_Library. As well as Proquest it also includes access to the Gale database, which also has hits for the subject, such as this one providing bylined commentary on the popularity of the subject's performances. ResonantDis_tortion 11:27, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have added several of these sources to the article, so it is no longer unreferenced. This includes a further sigcov article, archived here. Article still needs work. ResonantDis_tortion 15:22, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for spending your time on a random article! Do you think the cited sentences would be enough for a servable article; and delete the rest. I assume you scanned all the internet and nothing else would be cited if you will not cite it :). LastJabberwocky (talk) 15:40, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I did a minimum level of analysis to ensure the article is no longer uncited. Please make no further assumptions. For the record, there are so many hits on proquest, ranging from bylined coverage to pure listings, that it's a non-trivial job to trawl through and work out what text can and can't be cited. ResonantDis_tortion 18:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even with new sources provided, which were human interest stories about local artists, these two improv performers still do not meet notability guidelines, certainly not WP:ENT, making "unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I find I cannot agree with this characterisation of the 6 sources provided above. The subject has been performing for at minimum 10-years, according to The Journal source, and evidently has a level of cultural ENT impact given these quotes from bylined secondary sources: "hottest comedy tickets in the north-east" (Guardian), "one of the in-demand acts on the stand-up circuit" (Northern Echo), "Infamous" (Journal), "a high standard of entirely improvised comedy" (Journal), "rise to the top of Newcastle's cultural agenda with the improvisational comedy troupe The Suggestibles" (Evening Chronicle), "despite having no script or plans of action, The Suggestibles managed to turn around an hour-and-a-half of comedy gold" (Shields Gazette), and "It's proved so popular in recent years" (Journal). ResonantDis_tortion 19:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as they do have a dedicated article in a national UK newspaper the Guardian already referenced in the article as well as multiple regional newspaper coverage so I believe they pass WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete/Weak Keep: ResonantDistortion found good sources confirming the notability of the subject, but there not still not enough coverage. At least currently, the Suggestibles page has the coverage that they exist and perform in this list of clubs. If we get just a little bit more, the would be finally convincing. I searched archive.org for the Suggestibles, and there is nothing. LastJabberwocky (talk) 09:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rhythm of Love Tour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable concert. No coverage in sources. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 12:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Events. Shellwood (talk) 13:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Asia and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:38, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rhythm of Love (Kylie Minogue album)#Promotion, similar to Minogue's Enjoy Yourself Tour. Damian Vo (talk) 04:22, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Is there more support for Redirecting this article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rhythm of Love (Kylie Minogue album)#Promotion, album article is well sourced and can cover the tour adequately. MidnightMayhem 11:53, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Rhythm of Love (Kylie Minogue album) as a separate section. A stand-alone article like this rarely gets significant coverage, but it's close enough that it can the part of the album article. A redirect in this instance is like "throwing out the baby with the bath water" - an excessive over-reaction that would diminish the project. Bearian (talk) 00:35, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aditi Saigal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a case of Wp:TOOSOON. Just one film as acting career and one ep for that she received some press coverage. Other than that she is daughter of singer and actor parents but notability is not inherited. Fails wp:NACTOR and Wp:NMUSIC as well. Zuck28 (talk) 11:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Women, Film, Music, India, Delhi, and Wales. Zuck28 (talk) 11:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 02:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per WP:FORBES, Forbes is generally considered a reliable source and can see Forbes covering profile for this person in their article here ^[1] Circular Karma (talk) 14:06, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.forbesindia.com/article/30-under-30-2024/aditi-saigal-aka-dot-winning-with-words-and-melody/91751/1

Not all individuals featured in Forbes necessarily meet the eligibility threshold for a standalone Wikipedia article.

The subject must first satisfy the notability criteria outlined in Wikipedia's WP:Notability guidelines as a prerequisite for inclusion.

Zuck28 (talk) 14:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability is not established per WP:NACTOR, WP:MUSICBIO nor WP:GNG. The sourcing consists of standard PR type promo that one would see for any emerging actor with a press agent, including Forbes, which is not significant coverage, it's simply a photo of her with a caption mentioning her name, thus trivial. The Forbes "profile" link above is more standard PR ~~written by "Forbes Staff", (it does not even have a by-line)~~. I agree with the nom that this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Perhaps in a few more years this emerging actor will become notable, but at this time, one acting role, Spotify "fans" and famous parents is not enough. Netherzone (talk) 15:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does have a byline and in my view counts as one piece of significant reliable sources coverage. Another reliable bylined piece in the Hindu here, another bylined piece here, leaning Keep for WP:GNG rather than WP:NACTOR imvAtlantic306 (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: One film is not sufficient to pass WP:NACTOR. Need at-least three feature films/web series/TV to comply WP:ACTOR. Forbes 30 Under 30 is paid. Bakhtar40 (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
General comment: Two is enough. Guideline says: "multiple" not "several". -Mushy Yank. 14:35, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: coverage has her meet WP:GNG. At worst a redirect to The_Archies_(film)#Cast is totally warranted so opposed to deletion. -Mushy Yank. 14:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails to meet WP:NACTRESS. RangersRus (talk) 18:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 10:29, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Schwartz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of any notability whatsoever - prior print sources were bogus and unverifiable. Biased and POV statements littered throughout the article and the subject has flaunted said article on social media (facebook) many times. Large chunk of contributions to the article are from suspicious anonymous IP addresses that have only edited that page, as well as Guy Schwartz's own wikipedia account. Subject has not established notability and this page should be deleted. Brandonac4473 (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Politicians, Journalism, Television, New Jersey, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Well, the article is unsourced, so that's of no help. I don't find anything for sourcing. Could be notable, but the lack of any kind of sourcing isn't helpful. Could be a hoax or an LLM article for all I know. Could likely speedy this. Oaktree b (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment is the nominator the ip who removed the references which are shown here on the basis that they were bogus such as the Houston Press?. However, I did find this piece in the Houston Press here so maybe they weren't as bogus as is claimed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep also found these other Houston Press articles about him here, here,here, here, here, and here. Going by this evidence the other references removed such as Billboard may be genuine as well, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, yes I am the user who called the Houston press in an attempt to independently verify the articles he cited on his own wikipedia page - none of those print articles existed according to them.

Your first link to houston press is talking about MARTY schwartz, not Guy Schwartz - Marty is a youtuber with infinitely more notoriety.

Of the rest of the articles you linked, guy schwartz is the main subject of only TWO of those articles - and not to mention, they are all by the same publication. Which per WP:GNG - "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability."

The only cited source within the entire article that I could find that had any direct ties to guy schwartz was yet another Houston Press article from 2007 entitled "South By Due East↵Racket heads for Austin as Guy Schwartz and M. Martin bicker over the history of a local festival" and it was incorrectly cited for a statement that claimed they have been running said festival since 2003 - which the article mentions nowhere. Thus why I pulled it from the article.

Perhaps Guy Schwartz could write a new wikipedia page about himself with info from those two articles that he is the subject of, appropriately citing things that are within those articles for the information therein. But the article as it stands is a plethora of wild unsupported claims - such as claims of a 2016 presidential campaign that are based in nothing but fantasy. Claiming he toured with Duran Duran, Todd Rundgren and Huey Lewis.

If Guy Schwartz was truly notable, then one would think he would manage more than a couple articles in Houston Press about his band. Brandonac4473 (talk) 09:17, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the Billboard references I confirmed were bogus through online archives of those issues he claimed he was in.

It also doesnt change the fact that none of those articles you linked were cited within the page. Had they been, this may have been a different story. Albeit the issue still stands: Per WP:GNG "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability." Brandonac4473 (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, I've removed the Marty Schwartz reference. Agree more sources are required, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you agree more sources are required for notability, then please consider changing your recommendation to delete. Brandonac4473 (talk) 03:12, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly remove the bold in your request as it might be considered a !vote and it is assumed that nominators are generally in favour of deletion and cannot !vote. ◇Not sure it is appropriate to ask a voter to change their suggestion the way you did, but maybe that’s not an issue. -Mushy Yank. 18:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies - unbolded that word.

They can obviously do whatever they want, but I figured asking them to reconsider their vote would be appropriate considering that they now agree with the basis of my issue with the article to begin with - that more sources are needed. Brandonac4473 (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not yet fully convinced that additional sources do not exist so am sticking with my keep vote pending further evidence, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Houston Chronicle has bits of coverage about him; including this presenting him as "an icon of the Houston scene". -Mushy Yank. 00:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(and same media: https://www.chron.com/entertainment/music/article/guy-schwartz-new-jack-hippies-1979508.php (based on an interview)+ or this (short/similar to first and with similar appraisal, "a Houston institution"); this interview at Rag Radio (with an extensive presentation) (see WP:INTERVIEWS, an essay) can serve is this is kept to expand and verify. So that imv, he might meet one or two of the inclusion criteria as defined in the guideline about WP:Notability (music), namely:

"Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself"

(excludes interviews) and/or, more likely:

"Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city"

Houston is a city. GS, at 73, seems to be listed among the most prominent Americana musicians of its local scene. Ergo (weak) keep? If kept, the article, currently tag-bombed, should be cleaned up. -Mushy Yank. 00:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do any of these articles you linked support the plethora of claims made throughout the article?

This is why my attempts to verify them were so exhaustive. There are no credible sources for him having ran a 2016 presidential campaign, no credible sources for having toured with Duran Duran or Huey Lewis.

He might've passed WP:GNG if those articles were properly cited within the article but they weren't cited at all.

And Houston Chronicle calling his band an "icon" is a stretch particularly when their latest "music video" has 48 views on youtube. link

Houston Chronicle is open for business btw for paid promotions. Brandonac4473 (talk) 04:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even if notability is established, WP:NDELETE still says a wikipedia article must cite sources for whatever information it presents - regardless of notability.

The entirety of the article is filled with unverifiable claims. He still doesn't pass WP:GNG in my opinion but the criteria to delete the page has absolutely been met per WP:NDELETE even if he is truly notable. Brandonac4473 (talk) 09:16, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to fix it, then and remove everything you think is inappropriate (please do not WP:BLANK the page, though). As for the idea that a page about a "truly notable subject" should (or even could) be deleted because the page has no sources cited, although sources exist (and in the case of an/this AfD, especially if sources are presented!!!!), I am very sorry, but: ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Just read Wikipedia:Notability#Notability_is_based_on_the_existence_of_suitable_sources,_not_on_the_state_of_sourcing_in_an_article, which is a WP:guideline. "WP:NDELETE" is an essay (="the advice or opinions of one [..] Wikipedia contributor[s]", not a policy or guideline). You are totally free to cite it and it is not a problem, but it has little, if any, weight as an argument to delete a page. (I completely disagree with that essay, personally, and find it is full of wild and reckless assertions). Also, articles that do not pass WP:GNG but meet a given WP:SNG may be kept, depending on the case. Best, -Mushy Yank. 10:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, so you disagree with WP:NDELETE, thats fine.

Do you think Guy Schwartz meets WP:SIGCOV?

A brief mention in a list of other houston musicians seems like a trivial mention. Brandonac4473 (talk) 22:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:N. The phoney 2016 presidential campaign with no citations to back it up says everything to me. Nominator appears to have tried to independently verify the print articles thoroughly. My own searching of “Guy Schwartz” on the internet doesnt produce much either, except for his wiki page. Non-notable. Brenae wafato (talk) 21:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment found this here about his supposed 2016 Presidential bid but he doesn't seem to have made the ballot according to official records, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so this guy connected with me on a site called ome.tv and one of the first things he told me to do was check his wikipedia page, trying to tell me he was famous. i googled him and literally this was the only thing i found on him. given that... seems like he shouldnt have a wikipedia page LOL. he has no followers or coverage anywhere else.

i saw the notification at the top of his article inviting me to leave an opinion..

so i'd say delete but i also dont know how wikipedia works. but this guy is not famous or notable and definitely shouldnt have a wikipedia page if he just goes around telling random people to check it out and has no real coverage anywhere else lmao. 24.27.40.108 (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I mentioned how he flaunts his wikipedia article on his facebook page, its clear he uses the article as a trophy - so this doesnt surprise me that he is telling strangers on the internet to go check it out. Brandonac4473 (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this guy did the same thing to me!!! he was all bragging about being famous and having a wikipedia page and i was like “dude… theres a thing right there that says your page is about to get deleted” and he was like “WHAT?!?” and disconnected 😂😂 70.113.49.149 (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Need more input from other experienced editors
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:49, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems like an easier call than indicated by some of the discussion here. Fails GNG and RS criterion and should be deleted. Go4thProsper (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And yet it does seem more complicated than that, because there are reliable sources and he might meet the specific guideline for musicians. -Mushy Yank. 09:24, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
None were in the article. The only one was incorrectly cited. He surely doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. His band releasing an album in an article with 20 other bands is a trivial mention. Him flaunting the wikipedia article on social media and apparently telling strangers about it on chat sites is a major red flag that he isnt notable. Brandonac4473 (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As Mushy Yank has noted, notability does not depend on the sourcing in the article, but on whether sourcing exists. In this case, looking for reviews of his albums seems like a useful thing to do. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete absolutely this guy is not famous or notable AT ALL. he pulled the same thing with me on ome.tv that the person above mentioned. bro is literally going around the internet showing off his wikipedia page yet he doesnt know its about to get deleted??? 😂 ive met famous people and they NEVER bring up their wiki page to brag about it lmao. yet that is apparently all this guy does. 70.113.49.149 (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bass-T

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG based on a WP:BEFORE search. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Germany. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the subject does appear to have an extensive catalogue of releases. Out of these, three singles do appear to have had impact on national charts: Germany and Austria. ResonantDis_tortion 19:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Currently lacks sufficient citations from reliable, independent sources to fully establish his notability. RolandSimon (talk) 04:28, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In addition to the charts the page has another good source, and from a slight search in Google news I found another moderately good source. LastJabberwocky (talk) 07:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that this source adds anything towards notability personally. From my perspective, if that's the best we got, then that actually supports the argument that the individual isn't notable. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bands and musicians Templates for deletion

Proposed deletions

Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.

Firerose (via WP:PROD on 17 March 2025)

References

[1] ttps://www.forbesindia.com/article/30-under-30-2024/aditi-saigal-aka-dot-winning-with-words-and-melody/91751/1

[1]

Bands and musicians

Bands and musicians Templates for deletion

Categories

References