Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation

Shortcuts

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Comics and animation. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Comics and animation|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Comics and animation. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...

Scan for comics AfDs

Scan for animation AfDs
Scan for webcomics AfDs
Scan for comics Prods
Scan for animation Prods
Scan for webcomics Prods
Scan for comics template TfDs
Scan for animated series template TfDs

Related deletion sorting

Comics and animation

Komiks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a foreign dictionary. ~~Komics (TV series)~~ Komiks (TV series) should be moved here. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:31, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~: I created the page as a redirect in 2008 because "komiks" in Philippine English refers to Philippine comics (ref. ABS-CBN, Philippine Daily Inquirer, Rappler) However, after 17 years, someone changed it to a disambiguation page, adding Polish comics. While "komiks" also means comics in Polish, I am unsure if this applies to other English language variants. ~~If the evidence supports that "komiks" refers to Polish comics in other English variants, keep them. Otherwise, it should revert to the original redirect for Philippine comics.~~ --Jojit (talk) 00:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed my opinion to just keep it because "komiks" can now refer to three things here in English Wikipedia. Hence, it makes sense to have a disambiguation page for "komiks". --Jojit (talk) 05:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The redlink in the nomination is undoubtedly a typo; the nominator appears to be proposing that Komiks (TV series) is the main topic for "Komiks" should this disambiguation page be deleted. (At this time I offer no opinion on any of this.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know nothing much about comics or Philippine media, but I note that there are a large number of articles linking to Komiks, some of which seem to refer to the TV show and some to Philippine comics as a genre. Some serious sorting out is needed here, whatever the outcome of the discussion. In the meantime I've added the TV series to the dab page, which seems to have been a serious omission. PamD 07:23, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of playing cards related anime and manga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Creator objected to proposed deletion. They provided sources on the article's talk page, but I'm not really convinced by them; one is a YouTube video by Mother's Basement (an obviously unreliable source), another is a BackerKit page for a TTRPG, and yet a third one isn't a meaningful source at all, but just a content tag on CoroCoro's website. The others they linked are at least from sites that could conceivably be utilized in Wikipedia, but they're all mostly discussing Yu-Gi-Oh, with a couple of them mentioning other series in passing mostly in relation to Yu-Gi-Oh. Several of the not-outright-unreliable or user-generated sources here are from WP:VALNET, and most of the rest are just from Anime News Network. The current state of the article is generally poorly sourced, and I don't see the potential state looking much better. It doesn't look like this passes NLIST. silviaASH (inquire within) 00:25, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Television, Visual arts, Comics and animation, Anime and manga, Games, and Popular culture. silviaASH (inquire within) 00:27, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is no substantial change in the article after the objection from Setenzatsu.2 (talk · contribs). The issue with the user is clearly a WP:IDHT case, and I wonder why they did not receive any kind of sanction after being reported to ANI. Xexerss (talk) 03:08, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From looking at the discussion, it seems to me like they went inactive for a few days and no one followed up on it before the topic got archived. They also never responded to the discussion and didn't edit between May 21st and 25th, so I'd say it was a pretty clear case of ANI flu. Obviously this AfD isn't the right venue to discuss their conduct, but given the quite obvious WP:RADAR issues it should probably be dealt with somehow. silviaASH (inquire within) 05:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just noting first finds: There's a brief comment on the topic in this magazine; Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts, Volume II, p. 254, provides some more serious commentary on card games within anime and manga fandom, although mixed with other activities. Can anyone see if there is something relevant on p. 19 of A Kid's Guide to Anime & Manga? This web article looks at one angle of the overall topic; not completely sure if this is a reliable source. Daranios (talk) 15:26, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Manga: The Complete Guide, p. 122, has a sentence of comparison between card games related to manga vs. video games. Trading Card Games For Dummies has a 13-page chapter on trading card games related to anime, manga and comics. Daranios (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be possible to create an article about card-themed anime and manga series (I can't think of a particular title at the moment). The problem is this list article and its poorly sourced and worded content. I don't feel like I'm reading an encyclopedic Wikipedia article, but a Fandom article or something like that. Xexerss (talk) 00:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, even if this article topic is notable, I'm not sure a list is the appropriate way to cover it, and I think WP:TNT applies. silviaASH (inquire within) 00:22, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and possibly rename to List of card games related anime and manga or something more simple. As by the discussion above, I don't think WP:NLIST is actually a problem. I also don't think this is a case of WP:TNT, which would mean that nothing here is usable in an encyclopedic article: The introduction needs sources, and then probably a rephrasing in accordance with the sources. But this is primarily a list, so that's a minor issue. The list below could nicely fulfill the purpose of navigation which is one of major reasons to have list at Wikipedia, if non-relevant examples were removed. There's enough blue links here to still constitute a proper list after such a trim. Other examples should in my view only be included if their inclusion can be verified by a reliable secondary source, solving the other issue raised in the nomination. So in total, spelling out an inclusion critereon and implementing it can save this through normal editing, which means deletion is not appropriate in accordance with WP:ARTN and WP:ATD. Daranios (talk) 09:56, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename to List of card games related anime and manga per above. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 16:39, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Carreres

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks SIGCOV in independent sources. The two sources mentioned in this article only mention him in passing. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 18:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Comics and animation, and Spain. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 18:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and I believe the same page was speedied on the Spanish Wikipedia. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 19:28, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight Sun (character)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This and this are the only independent sources I was able to find on this character. This is an incredibly minor villain (outside Shang-Chi's origin story), so there isn't a lot that can be written about the subject beyond plot synopsis.

It's been tagged for notability concerns for awhile, and it has had known issues with its over-reliance on primary sources since 2014. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Shang-Chi, as WP:Alternative to deletion, where the character is already mentioned, and which can at the very least benefit from the one/two independent source/s present. Daranios (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Shang-Chi - Minor fictional character that really does not have much in the way of reliable sources to pass the WP:GNG. But, their role in Shang-Chi's background is already included in that article, so that would make a reasonable redirect. Rorshacma (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laura's Star and the Dream Monsters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. All I could find is one short review by KinderFilmWelt (Children's Film World?) to go with the one already sourced in the article, not AFAIK "full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." Clarityfiend (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Comics and animation, and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Keep - There's a review by Eltern magazine: [1]. --Mika1h (talk) 08:09, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Review by Kino-Zeit: [2]. About page is fairly impressive, editor in chief is also a jury member at IFFMH festival. The site had a panel at Filmfest München. The reviewer has also written for Rotten Tomatoes approved publication That Shelf. --Mika1h (talk) 08:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review by de:Vision Kino: [3]

I think that's enough for notability. Even if one were to discount Kino-Zeit (I don't), I think reviews by KinderFilmWelt, Eltern, and Vision Kino are enough for a keep. --Mika1h (talk) 08:38, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Film is part of a film series with 2 other films and a tv special released by a well-known distributor. the first film doesn't have that many sources either. I also found another review by Kino.de here: http://www.kino.de/kinofilm/lauras-stern-und-die-traummonster/123654, I'll add it to the article later. TheDutchArchivist (talk) 09:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage such as reviews identified in this discussion that together shows a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:09, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Mackey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable character, fails GNG. Almost all of the sources are primary, and the ones that aren't are of questionable reliability and/or do not demonstrate significant coverage. A WP:BEFORE search did not yield results. Madeleine (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:14, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Halsall, Alison (2008). "Bigger Longer & Uncut: South Park and the Carnivalesque". In Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (ed.). Taking South Park Seriously. Albany: SUNY Press. pp. 35–36. doi:10.2307/jj.18253053.6. ISBN 978-0-7914-7565-2. JSTOR jj.18253053.6. Retrieved 2025-05-25 – via Google Books.
  The book notes: "No better example demonstrates Parker and Stone's concern with the scatological than Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo, the talking piece of shit who "comes out of the toilet once a year to give presents to all the little boys and girls who have fiber in their diets." Mr. Hankey is excrement incarnate: He jumps out of the toilet and leaves a brown mark, a smear, a stain, on every surface he touches as a reminder to the viewer of the inherent dirtiness of the human body no matter how much we try to aestheticize it.* Mr. Hankey's stains systematically mess up the cleanliness of the social order. ... What makes Mr. Hankey such a complicated piece of shit, however, is the fact that he is also a parody of one of the most widely recognized icons of American popular culture, Mickey Mouse, complete with plump brown body, gloved hands and large, happy eyes. Both are lovable, kind, and spout inanities. Consider Mr. Hankey's nonsensical expression to Kyle: "Gosh, Kyle, you smell like flowers." Parker and Stone pervert this world-renowned cultural icon by suggesting that he is nothing more than a piece of shit; further, their codification of Mr. Hankey as a "Christmas Poo" characterizes Christmas, ... as shit. ... As a brown smear, Mr. Hankey operates repeatedly as a force of disruption. Significantly, in the "Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo" episode, Hankey helps to thwart the sanitization of the Christian holiday that the mayor and inhabitants of South Park are promoting, especially in their nondenominational and therefore inoffensive holiday pageant designed by Philip Glass. In the episode "A Very Crappy Christmas," Mr. Hankey's noted absence from the town leaves the inhabitants with no Christmas spirit; again, then, the absence of this piece of holiday shit disrupts the "regular" commercialism that Parker and Stone use to characterize the Christmas season."
  The book notes in a footnote: "The difficulty that this character offers also lies in the fact that, like Mickey Mouse, Mr. Hankey is a minstrel figure, a figure who is conventionally a member of a and of entertainers with blackened faces, performing songs and music ostensibly of African-American origin."
2. Thompson, Dave (2014). South Park FAQ: All That's Left to Know About The Who, What, Where, When of America's Favorite Mountain Town. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Applause Theatre and Cinema Books. ISBN 978-1-4803-5064-9. Retrieved 2025-05-25 – via Google Books.
  The book notes: "School counselor and occasional teacher Mr. Mackey is widely regarded as one of the most levelheaded members of the South Park Elementary faculty, rarely flustered, seldom enraged, and prone to reinforce his every point with a casual, friendly exclamation of "mkay?" However, he is also prey to occasional misunderstandings and miscalculations, such as the time a sample of marijuana he was utilizing in a drug education class was stolen. He was subsequently fired, and, having also lost his apartment, he briefly became a drug user himself. During this period he married a fellow addict; the pair then honeymooned in India, before Mackey alone was rescued by the A Team. Disturbingly, although the marriage was consummated, Mackey was so high at the time he had no memory of the event."
3. Fisher, Roy; Harris, Ann; Jarvis, Christine (2008). Education in Popular Culture: Telling Tales on Teachers and Learners. London: Routledge. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-415-33241-5. Retrieved 2025-05-25 – via Google Books.
  The book notes: "South Park's school counsellor, Mr Mackey, is another sad misfit who fails the children. He too merely carries out orders. The children are sent to him to be 'cured' of their swearing. He doesn't counsel, but lectures them on their bad behaviour, then entertains them with a totally inappropriate song, 'It's Easy MKay?', that parodies the 'Just Say No' anti-drugs campaign, revealing an equally unsubtle and ill-informed approach to a social problem. The ineffectual nature of his interventions is encapsulated by the fact that after joining in a rousing chorus of the song, the children go straight back to see the film that introduced them to the language in the first place. The film and the series offer a painful critique of approaches to education that focus on superficial rather than deep learning and which are undemocratic and complacent about wider social and political debates."
4. Peters, Mark (2007). Yada, Yada, Doh! 111 Television Words That Made the Leap from the Screen to Society. Oak Park, Illinois: Marion Street Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-933338-31-6. Retrieved 2025-05-25 – via Internet Archive.
  The book notes: "TV Origin: M'kay is best known as the catchphrase of Mr. Mackey, the guidance counselor on South Park. His first episode was “Mr. Hankey,The Christmas Poo” (written by Trey Parker, Dec. 17, 1997), and the word was first used as Mackey confronted a very confused Kyle, whose singing, Santa-hat-clad friend Mr. Hankey is only perceived as a garden-variety piece of crap by the rest of the world. Mr. Mackey says: “Now, uh, Kyle, as your school counselor, I want to try and help you confront your problem, m’kay?” In an introduction to the episode, Trey Parker says Mr. Mackey was based on one of his counselors from junior high."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Mr. Mackey to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 10:31, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Striking the first source per below. I think the remaining sources are enough for Mr. Mackey to meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Deletion is not best approach when there are alternatives to deletion like merging to List of South Park characters#Mr. Mackey. Cunard (talk) 09:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per Cunard above. /Julle (talk) 13:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Redirect due to trivial sources. Please note @Cunard that your first source above is not about Mr. Mackey whatsoever. Geschichte (talk) 08:37, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per Cunard. Very interested to hear why none of these sources turned up in the BEFORE the nominator said they had done. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 18:50, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I still don't understand why you think the sources are good enough for a standalone Wikipedia article. The first two sources do not help the article pass MOS:FICTIONAL, which states that: "Articles about fiction, like all Wikipedia articles, should use the real world as their primary frame of reference. As such, the subject should be described from the perspective of the real world". The sources are written from an in-universe perspective. The third source states that someone in the real world picked up the catchphrase "m'kay?", but again I don't see why this warrants a Wikipedia page for the character. Geschichte (talk) 07:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Found two more books that contain some critical analysis focused on the character, as a vehicle for social commentary on disability rights and sexual education respectively. See Deconstructing South Park: Critical Examinations of Animated Transgression by Brian Cogan and Taking South Park Seriously by Jeffrey Weinstock. The analysis only spans a few pages within the ~hundreds of pages of each book, but I think it is enough to constitute WP:SIGCOV, especially when combined with Cunard's other sources. Flip^and Flopped ㋡ 16:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Millsap

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. A behind-the-scenes film production worker doesn't get a lot of media notice. He's no exception. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, Television, Comics and animation, Kansas, Missouri, and Tennessee. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. As I've already told the user before, both in their talk page and in another AfD, they must remember that this is a BLP, so the standards for sourcing are much more strict than the article observes, also. Coeusin (talk) 00:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HilssaMansen19 (talk) 10:49, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beach Head (G.I. Joe)

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG entirely. Mostly plot article of a non-notable cartoon character. (The previous nomination was closed as procedural keep due to the nom's disruption, but the merits were not discussed at all). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Toys. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero characters. As in actually merge rather than just redirect so there's not less about the character than there is than Colonel Courage, as there's clearly some very minor notability, if not enough to justify a standalone
- https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Ultimate_Guide_to_G_I_Joe_1982_1994/_BNjDwAAQBAJ? and https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fPYYEQAAQBAJ don't have much in-depth of the guy but would probably make acceptable citations of the basic facts in a list article.
- https://thehardtimes.net/lists/every-g-i-joe-ranked-by-how-well-they-could-teach-a-sex-ed-class/ and https://thehardtimes.net/lists/50-g-i-joe-characters-ranked-by-how-effectively-they-could-have-stopped-9-11/ are a bit useless, even on the zany listicle scale. LOL, he has BO, it was mentioned on his filecard and never again.
- https://lylesmoviefiles.com/2013/03/25/g-i-joe-the-movie-review-an-80s-classic-revisited/ again provides a source for citation of his role in the movie, but not in depth to justify a standalone
- While some of the capsules at https://screenrant.com/gi-joe-3-characters-villains-discussion/ could probably help stub a Reception section, Beach Head's isn't one of them.
As an overall point, this one can function nicely as a test case.

I'm not actually sure any of the G. I. Joe characters flood-nominated recently warrant deletion, most of them just need to be merged to the appropriate character list articles, as the vast majority have *some* notability, even if it's far from what's needed for GNG. As merging after an AfD involves simply redirecting because closing admins are busy people, I would suggest the sub-par Joe articles would be better sorted through proactive use of editing and merge/redirect templates, which would be a less time-consuming method for everyone involved, and probably wouldn't take any more time than decent BEFORE and researching AfD votes. Otherwise there's the risk we end up in one of those moronic loops where the list directs people to the main article, which directs people back to the list, which is a lot more irritating to 99% of readers of Wikipedia than an article being on the crufty side. Personally don't see the need to have a ticking clock on that being done after 19 years or whatever of the article being there. BoomboxTestarossa (talk) 09:20, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I was wondering on if you are for or against the merge. --Rtkat3 (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Allfather (Benison) (talk) 13:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per WP:ATD and WP:CONSENSUS. I don't see how this meets WP:SIGCOV, but it's healthy for this community to strive for middle ground so we can actually fix things. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge with List of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero characters in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comics and animation proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Redirects for discussion

Templates for discussion