Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Games

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Games: board, card, etc. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Games|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Games: board, card, etc. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

See also Sports-related deletions and Video games-related deletions.


[edit]
2024 World Junior Ultimate Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.

Draftified a week ago for the same reason; sources added prior to move back to mainspace were two connected with participants ([1] [2]) and one from the tournament organiser. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've add more reference sources. Did you think that it's enough? Thanks. Stevencocoboy (talk) 02:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pakistani cricket team in England in 2026 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't start for over a year. Sooo obviously too soon. England have two Test series before this one starts. Retarget to 2025–2027 World Test Championship #England v Pakistan where this is mentioned at target per WP:CHEAP and WP:ATD. Servite et contribuere (talk) 02:43, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it should be delete or redirect. The series is a part WTC 2025-27 Cycle. Keep it as per evidence and sources as enough. England have announced FTP for 2026, and these series is Test (longest format) and it comes under ICC event as mentioned in FTP of ICC. Keep it. Thank you. Goodknowme (talk) 04:22, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I truly think Joseph has truly put out a great rationale, and I think they were words I was looking for in mine. Seeing if anyone agrees with this rationale. Tagging to see what people think. @Goodknowme @Knitsey @QEnigma @Vestrian24Bio. Changing vote/argument is not compulsory, but I do think this is a great rationale, and one that should be at least looked at. Servite et contribuere (talk) 21:50, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ASTAR Scrabble Challenge International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability of this contest. The bulk of the article is an excessive record of previous winners and placegetters. There are a few mentions of individual winners online, but nothing to justify this article. Blackballnz (talk) 05:49, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Castles of Orbaal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single ref on the page, nothing else found to show that the notability criteria for inclusion have been met JMWt (talk) 19:32, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dabaru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find news or media sources that would help this subject pass WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Even after its release, there are no reliable critical reviews available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DivitNation (talkcontribs) 09:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep: Although there is significant amount of coverage, the mainspace badly needs to be formatted as it doesnt follows WP:GNG despite being notable enough.
~~BengalMC (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Chill Master's Screen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable RPG supplement. This article does list a few references, with a review from a sci-fi magazine, but do not see lasting notability.

The overall topic of gamemaster's screen seems to be notable, but no indication that this specific one is. Natg 19 (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Mika1h's latest objection following the article expansion has not been addressed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 19:20, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge: The best source is a capsule review in a long list of reviews of Chill-related products. The recently added sources are a directory entry with borderline SIGCOV (leaning against this being SIGCOV) in a source with unclear reliability and another entry which doesn't contain SIGCOV of the equipment. I confirmed that the pre-existing sources don't have SIGCOV either. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – The only genuine coverage here is a short capsule review in Space Gamer #71, while the other references (Heroic Worlds directory note, Le Grog database entry, museum catalogue listing) are routine listings that do not constitute significant independent coverage. Lacking the depth required by WP:GNG and WP:NGAME, this supplement is not notable enough for its own article. Aeon Sentinel (talk) 22:55, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for discussion

[edit]