User:Thingg/dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports
[edit]- Deckerphil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ragingplatapus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- 24.184.178.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:34, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 23:43, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2601:247:447c:3750:a4ce:280b:8fd:cdcc (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- 27.125.244.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:47, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1700:c1a0:ef70:703a:510:fea7:4c60 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 194.127.137.176 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 139 (Fixed position vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Coconut26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Maxpro2025 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ruskanaya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:03, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 101.108.133.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:10, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 191.99.19.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:43, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 67.161.84.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Homophobic vandalism; see revisions revision 1289041093 and revision 1289040529. B637275 (talk) 03:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- 191.99.19.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – LTA. Untamed1910 (talk) 05:45, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 1 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 6 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 13 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- Ligmadosidsodiodsssa (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "LickFoo" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:20, 27 April 2025 (UTC)- Looks like a false positive. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:20, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure; "Ligma do-si-dso-dio-dsssa", and only edit thus far was an empty talk page comment on Talk:Sigma, as in, "What the sigma?" –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- I'd keep watching this one for now, per LaundryPizza03 — The Anome (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Beloved midget (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Kunaofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- DisappearJustLikePoof (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used f instead of ph attempting to skip filter: Poop. Violating string: disappearjustlikepooph" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Bambibaby11111 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "bambi|teletubbies" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- LoreseekerFromTheShadowVales (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Pissouut (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yougottheshirtnumberwrong (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Raindropskeepfallingonmyheads (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- NoobMaster2754 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- VECNA THE GOD KILLER (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:10, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Goldfinger Limited (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See contributions. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- NRC Digital Marketing Agency (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Has 'marketing agency' in its name. ☩ (Babysharkboss2) 17:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- ArcAngelEntertainment (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Docratglobal (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See userpage. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Titanic International Society (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:36, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- WM Morocco (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Promotional username that implies shared use, an intent stated on their User page. Not sure if this is really Wikimedia or not. Jusdafax (talk) 02:49, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Beksterdev (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User sandbox purports to promote a website by similar name. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- DAR AL TATAWOR (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User page purports to promote a business by similar name. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:14, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- H5game.in (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User page purports to promote a business by similar name. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:15, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Forbex (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. User page purports to represent part of the brand Forbes. Either a disallowed promotional username or a misleading username if fake. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- "PBC88login" (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). See their sandbox article. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 05:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Continuous editing. There should be maintained authenticity.
Reason: This page has had multiple edits over the past years with differring descriptions, which threatens the accuracy and reliability of the content. Semi-protection is requested to maintain the authenticity and integrity of the information
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Restoration of unsourced and unverified contents, a failure to assume good faith. Unnecessary stonewalling basic cleanup. AɭʋaKʰedək (talk) 10:49, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- This request should be declined. You don't get to ask for protection right after you have restored the new edits (that have no consensus) even after knowing that another editor got blocked because of edit warring over the same reverts.[1] AlvaKedak you should make a self-revert and focus on gaining consensus on talk page. CharlesWain (talk) 13:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined for now per above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- This request should be declined. You don't get to ask for protection right after you have restored the new edits (that have no consensus) even after knowing that another editor got blocked because of edit warring over the same reverts.[1] AlvaKedak you should make a self-revert and focus on gaining consensus on talk page. CharlesWain (talk) 13:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Subject of a rumoured driver transfer (by RS) in Formula One.[2] Disruptive editing expected until 18 May (Emilia Romagna Grand Prix). MB2437 20:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Per the Franco Colapinto request. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Why Isn't This Move Protected? 2603:8080:600:AADE:4940:79DD:DFB8:709B (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:28, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:30, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Redirects aren't articles and aren't covered by that remedy. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple IPs/ new users. Ʀasteem (talk) 03:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC). Ʀasteem (talk) 03:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Not an article whose topic is strictly within the topic area. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:36, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Redirects aren't articles and aren't covered by that remedy. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Not an article whose topic is strictly within the topic area. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:41, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:42, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism; see revisions revision 1289041093 and revision 1289040529. B637275 (talk) 03:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Protections are not for single IPs. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Redirects aren't articles and aren't covered by that remedy. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:44, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Redirects aren't articles and aren't covered by that remedy. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Edit warring / content dispute. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5#ECP by default Valorrr (lets chat) 03:46, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Valorrr: Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Redirects aren't articles and aren't covered by that remedy. I also don't see any indications of an edit war. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism and unconstructive edits by IPs; pending changes protection does not seem to be the most effective, especially since the US Congress is a highly exposed article about U.S. politics. HwyNerd Mike (talk | contribs) 04:04, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pending changes seems to be handling the disruption well: it is generally spaced out, with weeks between each instance. Sdrqaz (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Disputes have died down at the talk page. Requesting a decrease to semi-protection. SKAG123 (talk) 22:59, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- I oppose this. ECP is much required. The page has a history of disruption, and this is a contentious topic and equally controversial topic both in Wikipedia and in real life. Also see the recent signpost.[3] Koshuri (グ) 03:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined As Koshuri Sultan accurately points out, this article has a long history of problems, requiring indefinite protection even more ECP was added. Since this isn't a "current event", it seems the problems aren't going to die down any time soon, and instead it is a perpetually contentious topic. Editors can still request edits on the talk page. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:09, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I don't think vandals will disrupt this. GloryToCalifornia (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- Declined Has been protected many times in the past due to sockpuppetry, not so much for vandalism. Reasons given here don't address the reason for protection. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 02:24, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I am done with the draft of "William Tafoya, Ph.D." and believe is ready to go live. I need someone with Administrator who can move this page. Thank You! RandallWRobinson (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- @RandallWRobinson I've submitted it through the Articles for creation process so an experienced user who has permissions can review and move it. Parksfan1955 (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
I can't submit my article Carolineearley (talk) 21:47, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 08:52, 5 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled
[edit]- CherryPie94 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
New page reviewer who has made over 90 articles including 1 good article and quite familiar with content guidelines, I may also as well not clutter the backlog for other reviewers. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 06:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- One thing that immediately jumped out at me is some biographical articles created (e.g. Kim Na and Son Se-bin) have unsourced biographical information, such as the date of birth. This information should be sourced to ensure compliance with WP:DOB. - Aoidh (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Ah I've misinterpreted that personal website policy, though it does fall under WP:ABOUTSELF, I've now also directly sourced it. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've considered adding references directly next to DOB, which I did at my two most recent BLPs: Mike Kim and Lee Joon-ho. If birth information is not 100% verifiable, I play it safe (eg. Lee Seung-yoon). Per WP:DOB, links to websites maintained by the subject are generally permitted so I included Kim Na's personal website which states birth year as 1986 in the external links section. I created Son Se-bin over 5 years ago when I was much less experienced, so I don't quite recall which exact source I used for DOB (birth year seems to have been present in Star Today), so I've just amended that. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 04:22, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Kjansen86 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right.— MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)- @LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the
{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC) - @LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- -Verso- (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
78 live articles, (64 of which is start class, 5 Cs, 8 Stubs). Only one was deleted which is from 2018. All of the articles are well-sourced. I think this user is good enough for Autopatrolled Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 04:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hteiktinhein (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Fade258 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello Admin! I have been regularly creating articles and I'm also familiar with WP:AUTOPAT and Wikipedia policies. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- MerlinVtwelve (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Phantomdj (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
- Owais Al Qarni (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia for the past five years and have created over 150 articles. I strive to produce well-sourced, high-quality content on topics such as Bayan al-Quran, Mamunul Haque, and Deobandi fiqh, and I have also improved existing articles like the one on Zakariyya Kandhlawi. While I understand that the Autopatrolled user right is not necessary for editing, I have noticed that the page review process can be significantly delayed, with some of my pages taking 6–12 months to be reviewed. As a New Page Reviewer for the past two years, I actively participate in wiki forums, including AfD, and none of my articles have been deleted in the past three years, which I believe demonstrates my understanding of notability and other relevant guidelines. I believe I am eligible for the Autopatrolled right, which would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed pages. Additionally, I have held the Autopatrolled right on Bengali Wikipedia for the past five years. Thanks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 04:02, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- FuzzyMagma (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Have created more than 250 articles with only 1 merged/deleted. I have 15 GA and participated in over 100 AfD with 88% convergence rate. So I am fairly familiar with policies FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support: The user is an experienced editor with a solid grasp of Wiki policies. I believe they are well-qualified for autopatrolled rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Bgrus22 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I came across Bgrus22 while doing new page patrols. These short bios are always well-sourced, compliant with core WP policies including WP:N and WP:V, compliant with the MOS. Only two deletions; one was a U1, the other was a five-year-old AfD and recent history shows full grasp of notability. Creates talk pages. With continued page creation in the works, Bgrus22's do not need to be reviewed by patrollers. (Note: the Xtools dates are not accurate because Bgrus22 reuses sandbox pages to prep pages before moving them to mainspace, so the date for the newly created articles in Xtools shows older dates of creation. Bgrus22 continues to be active, and the use of sandboxes is another reason to grant autopatrolled since kinks get worked out before mainspace.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC) Dclemens1971 (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- Fade258 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello Admin! I was granted a temporary page mover right twice about a years ago and again I would like to request the page mover right. I have read the WP:PMCRITERIA and familiar with Wikipedia policies. If I got a chance to gain this right then, it allows me to move pages on my own and without leaving redirect. Hope for positive response. Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 16:00, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Fade258:
- Have you read the Wikipedia:Page mover policy beyond just the criteria for granting—particularly, the redirect suppression criteria?
- Why did you suppress the redirect when moving Diego Emilio Martínez and Diego Leonardo Martínez?
- JensonSL (SilverLocust) 04:01, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @SilverLocust, Thank You for reviewing my request and Yes I am aware of redirect suppression criteria, naming policy as well as page mover policy and other relevant policy. I suppress the redirect while moving the page for the following reasons :
- 1) I noticed that the name Diego Martínez is common and the new title will clearly distinguishes this individual from others with similar names.
- 2) As per Wikipedia naming policy, The new title will provide a clear identification of the subject which is beneficial for the readers.
- 3) I think that the previous title was not widely used or searched for and leaving a redirect would not significantly aid users in finding the page.
- Thank You ! Fade258 (talk) 09:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Mass message sender
[edit]- FarmerUpbeat (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I believe that I should have Mass Message Sender permissions as I am WP:X’s newsletter (Ichthus)’s chief editor, and I will be sending various newsletters to the people of WP:X, as I have already done. Having this permission will help me fulfill my duties. Thank you! Benedictions, FarmerUpbeat (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- Somajyoti (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting permission to be a Pending Changes Reviewer. I spend most of my day editing Wikipedia. I have gone through almost all the pages under Category:Wikipedia policies, including Wikipedia's policies on vandalism detection, BLP policy, NPOV, Verifiability, and copyright. I have read the Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes guideline. Please consider my request. Somajyoti ✉ 07:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had an account for 25 days. — MusikBot talk 07:30, 12 April 2025 (UTC)- Done Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Loserhead (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. I would like to request pending changes reviewer rights. I pass the WP:PCCRITERIA as far as I know, and the right would allow me to help even more to build the encyclopedia by making sure only acceptable edits are approved. Thank you for your consideration. loserhead (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- AlvaKedak (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am eager to work enthusiastically to help reduce the backlog of pending changes by reviewing and maintaining edits. I have read and understood WP:VAND, and I will issue procedural warnings and welcome new users who edit articles under PCR protection. AɭʋaKʰedək (talk) 21:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done: You need some more experience of some of our other policies in this area especially related to copyright and reliable sourcing as these are sometimes reasons pages are pending changes protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:20, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Willbill6272 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
to help out and to contibute |possible (talk page stalker) Willbill6272 (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 8 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 15:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Willbill6272 Most of you edits seems to be in your user space, and I don't see a large number of reverts. Do you know what pending changes reviewer is? Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 12:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- yes its were a reviewer can approve changes on a pending changes protected page. |possible (talk page stalker) Willbill6272 (talk) 13:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not done Sohom (talk) 13:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- HilssaMansen19 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am applying for pending changing reviewer rights to help fighting in vandalism. I am familiar with all the pending changes/page reviewing/AfD policies. I have been very active in AfDs and have seen continuous vandalism there. I am aware about the vandalism, as the pages I have worked on and expanded, several occasions of sp vandalism have been there. Recently, one sp-vandal with a long history of doing that was blocked as I requested an admin to intervene. I am very active on Wikipedia now and will work along with fellow editors adhering to the policies. HilssaMansen19 (talk) 14:19, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Celjski Grad (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As part of reviewing questionable changes for vandalism, it would be helpful to be able to approve valid pending changes. Celjski Grad (talk) 16:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- MacaroniPizzaHotDog (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I would like to help reduce the pending changes backlog whenever I can. MacaroniPizzaHotDog (talk • contribs) 02:45, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Laura240406 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. I've been here for over a year with over 1500 total edits and I've been recently getting into watching recent changes and new pages and I want to contribute to the pending changes process too. I've read all of the material and I think I pass all criteria. Laura240406 (talk) 09:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]- Mohammad Umar Ali (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I have been on Wikipedia for over a year and have made over 1k edits. I mostly edit and monitor history articles. Several articles are sometimes disrupted knowingly or unknowingly by editors for which I have to revert. Having Rollback right would make the patrolling work easier and help to combat vandalism. I am aware of most of Wikipedia polices (WP:OR,WP:NPOV,WP:RS,etc.) I have also authored few articles like Bajirao I see [4]. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- AllCatsAreGrey (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I am requesting rollback permissions as I would like to utilize tools such as Huggle, which require this permission. I have been actively patrolling recent changes using a custom filter and have consistently notified users whose edits I have reverted. Thanks, – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Mamani1990 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello admins, I’m respectfully requesting rollback rights so that I may contribute more efficiently to counter-vandalism work using Huggle. Patrolling recent changes is what I enjoy most on Wikipedia, and I’ve found that it’s where I can make the most impact with the time I have available. I've made 1840 edits since January. At present, I review edits by right-clicking the diff link to open changes in a new tab in Chrome and then use RedWarn to revert and warn users when appropriate. While this process works, it's time-consuming and not ideal for high-volume patrolling. Having rollback rights would allow me to use Huggle, which would significantly increase my productivity and responsiveness in handling vandalism. Earlier, I made two requests for different user rights but withdrew them after realizing that my interest lies more in patrolling and counter-vandalism than in article creation or extended content curation. That said, I have written one article and contributed to creating another recently, and I do plan to continue helping in content areas where I can. I also take direction well and am open to feedback. Thank you for considering my request. m a MANÍ1990(talk | contribs) 21:48, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Fneskljvnl (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I have been on wikipedia for a few years & I've made over 1600 edits on the english wikipedia, and I've made over 7700 edits on wikimedia commons. I have reverted many vandalizing edits on a varierty of articles, and I've left many notices of these reverts on their talk pages. I've also made a few pages, mostly redirects, but I've also created other articles, including List of Agriotes species, Choristostreptus, and 1854 in Mexico. Having rollback privileges would make it much more efficient for me when undoing vandalism. No matter the decision, thanks so much! -Fneskljvnl🪱 (Contributions, Talk) (stay silly forever) 02:38, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Như Gây Mê (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi, I'm a long-time user on Wikipedia (have experience with rollback rights on my home Wiki), recently I'm actively using support tools to prevent cross-wiki vandalism (including enwiki). I'd like to be granted rollback rights on enwiki to make it more convenient to rollback here. Thanks! Halley luv Filipino ❤ 10:56, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Nahida (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reapplying. When I applied around 2 weeks ago I didn't have that many mainspace edits and was declined based on that (but given PCR) - [[5]]. I haven't used PCR that much, but I've made contributions elsewhere with CSD, AfC and files. I still believe Rollback will improve my ability to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm fine with waiting longer though if I need a bit more experience elsewhere. Nahida 🌷 15:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Policies and links
DYK
[edit]| Count of DYK Hooks | ||
| Section | # of Hooks | # Verified |
|---|---|---|
| February 25 | ||
| February 26 | 1 | |
| March 7 | 2 | |
| March 8 | 1 | |
| March 9 | 1 | |
| March 10 | 1 | |
| March 12 | 2 | |
| March 15 | 1 | |
| March 16 | 1 | |
| March 21 | 1 | 1 |
| March 22 | 1 | |
| March 23 | 2 | |
| March 24 | 4 | |
| March 25 | 1 | |
| March 26 | 1 | 1 |
| March 27 | 1 | |
| March 28 | 1 | |
| March 29 | 3 | |
| March 30 | 3 | |
| March 31 | 1 | 1 |
| April 1 | 1 | 1 |
| April 2 | 6 | 2 |
| April 3 | 3 | 2 |
| April 4 | 2 | 1 |
| April 5 | 4 | 3 |
| April 6 | 4 | 1 |
| April 7 | 2 | 2 |
| April 8 | 6 | 4 |
| April 9 | 11 | 5 |
| April 10 | 1 | |
| April 11 | 9 | 7 |
| April 12 | 8 | 6 |
| April 13 | 13 | 9 |
| April 14 | 8 | 5 |
| April 15 | 5 | 3 |
| April 16 | 9 | 7 |
| April 17 | 6 | 1 |
| April 18 | 16 | 9 |
| April 19 | 11 | 8 |
| April 20 | 11 | 6 |
| April 21 | 20 | 13 |
| April 22 | 11 | 9 |
| April 23 | 15 | 7 |
| April 24 | 14 | 6 |
| April 25 | 11 | 5 |
| April 26 | 10 | 4 |
| April 27 | 9 | 3 |
| April 28 | 14 | |
| April 29 | 2 | |
| April 30 | 6 | |
| May 1 | 3 | |
| May 2 | 7 | |
| May 3 | 3 | |
| May 4 | 3 | |
| May 5 | 9 | |
| May 6 | ||
| Total | 302 | 132 |
| Last updated 00:23, 6 May 2025 UTC Current time is 05:46, 6 May 2025 UTC [refresh] | ||