Jump to content

User:Thingg/dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 120
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 47
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 11
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 186
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 14
Open sockpuppet investigations 135
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

[edit]

Administrative backlog

[edit]

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]


CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 12

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Arbitration enforcement and WP:ARBPIA GiraffeLover19 (talk) 21:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Related to gambling scandal. Sushidude21! (talk) 21:42, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done - I gave it a month...see how we go... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:44, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 22:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent trade. Sushidude21! (talk) 22:53, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP user resumed edit warring to reinsert incorrect information about the game's art director since lifting of previous protection. Void if removed (talk) 22:58, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

update: it wasn't really edit warring, so much as it was garden-variety vandalism. permanent semi protection might be a good idea consarn (grave) (obituary) 01:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent addition of unsourced content due to transfer rumours, requesting a week's protection to prevent this. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 23:36, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Presistent BLP violations from IP users. Roast (talk) 23:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism, removal of sourced content, and addition of unsourced information or trivia. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 00:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Recently subject to persistent disruptive edits (changes: 1, 2, 3, 4), which included overlinking and eventually caused the article in question to warrant a copy edit template. The user in question and their IPs have been blocked just this week. Mr. Lechkar (talk) 02:15, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing. Film was released this weekend. Requesting semi-protection for two weeks. MB2437 02:24, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection, article has been targeted by socks of User:TotalTruthTeller24 for about three weeks now. BOZ (talk) 03:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Edit warring with disruptive IP edits which remove/revert recent changes (including a WP:GALLERY violation) in the article along with edit warring on several other Disney Channel international networks articles; range-block the IP user if necessary. Kaptain Yummy (talk) 03:45, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 03:58, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 03:59, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent WP:CUTPASTE moves. Happily888 (talk) 04:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – MAB. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 04:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:09, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many of the Zee Entertainment pages already protected for same reason. IPs continue to add logos that are NOT on the website and despite this thread which shows it doesn't meet the style guide. Numerous warnings and yet it is a daily revert at this point. CNMall41 (talk) 04:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many of the Zee Entertainment pages already protected for same reason. IPs continue to add logos that are NOT on the website and despite this thread which shows it doesn't meet the style guide. Numerous warnings and yet it is a daily revert at this point. CNMall41 (talk) 04:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many of the Zee Entertainment pages already protected for same reason. IPs continue to add logos that are NOT on the website and despite this thread which shows it doesn't meet the style guide. Numerous warnings and yet it is a daily revert at this point. CNMall41 (talk) 04:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated vandalism, probably because of the the fact that iOS 26 was recently announced. Recommending semi-protection or pending changes protection at the least. Justjourney (talk | contribs) 05:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip editors kept on adding unsourced content. Cassiopeia talk 05:24, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent edit-warring from IPs. GalStar (talk) (contribs) 07:11, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:12, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: This page has been protected for over four years, and no disruption has occurred since 2018. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Wugapodes: Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page has been protected for over four years, and no disruption has occurred since 2009. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Wugapodes Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: This page has been protected for over four years, and no disruption has occurred since 2009. Test to see if protection is still necessary. 2600:1700:C910:2960:A0A6:E1B2:A891:8B7C (talk) 19:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Pinging @Wugapodes Daniel Case (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Reason: Make way to accept Draft:Gillie da Kid at AfC. The title was salted by Maxim 18 years ago; they do not appear to be active. JSFarman (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Let's wait till the title is accepted. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
@Daniel Case: I reviewed the article at AfC and discovered the title was salted when I attempted to accept it. Can you unsalt it so it can be accepted? (Is "unsalt" a thing?) Thank you! JSFarman (talk) 03:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

  •  On hold: Hello, Pkk123477. Your edit request has been restored here as we need further input on this, as initially requested by Behappyyar. Would you be willing to post the sources that you have so that they can be reviewed and used to update the article? --Super Goku V (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Please correct the Iranian civilian casualties in paragraph three. It was recently changed without reason from 200 to 600. The sources currently listed actually say 200 but this is out off date. HRANA's latest figure is actually over 400. The source is presently used in the infobox for their own estimate of 1,054 total deaths. The Iranian government hasn't released updated figures so that should be removed until they have an estimate. I suggest adding the sentence:

"According to the anti-government Human Rights Activists in Iran News Agency, over 1,000 Iranians were killed including at least 400 civilians."

102.17.119.14 (talk) 03:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Shubhanshu Shukla (request) 2025-06-29 16:28 Fully protected, expires 2025-07-01 at 04:24:38 UTC (log) Protected by Daniel Case on 2025-06-28: "Edit warring / content dispute: per RFPP"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
12 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-06-03 11:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Graph:Chart (request) 2025-06-03 22:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-09-04: "High-risk template or module: 5001 transclusions (more info)"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-06-05 03:06 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
Template:Infobox sports season (request) 2025-06-05 23:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Graph (request) 2025-06-11 07:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-17: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Post-nominals/CAN (request) 2025-06-15 01:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Taxonomy/CAM (request) 2025-06-19 09:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2024-09-01: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Taxonomy/Polysporangiophytes (request) 2025-06-19 15:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by TheSandDoctor on 2021-08-21: "Highly visible template - 79k uses"
Module:IPA/data (request) 2025-06-20 10:25 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2023-09-16: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Infobox tennis tournament year (request) 2025-06-23 18:52 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox organization (request) 2025-06-25 18:55 Template-protected (log) Protected by Wugapodes on 2020-04-12: "Highly visible template: Restore protection after undeletion"
Template:Infobox racing driver (request) 2025-06-27 23:09 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)


RFA= Requests for adminship

RFP= Requests for permissions

Autopatrolled

[edit]

I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.


Confirmed

[edit]

Page mover

[edit]

I am requesting page mover right mainly because it would help me draftify articles (see my draftify log). And secondarily because it would allow me to perform uncontroversial moves in mainspace without leaving being redirects. I have not participated in RMs but I have made moves that show that I understand the guidelines, namely:

And more recently

 Done initially for 2 months. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 01:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I was recommended to return after over a dozen requests at RMTR, and after Gaza war mvoes, I think I've well surpassed that threshold. I'm otherwise keen to continue closing RMs in the backblog, and it'd make it more convenient to implement WP:POSTMOVE after closing such discussions rather than later. Thanks for your re-consideration. CNC (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC) CNC (talk) 21:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 01:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2][3]). MusikBot talk 08:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
This is a request for WP:PCR, not WP:ROLLBACK. Did you apply for the correct permission? HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
I did, but I have Twinkle and RedWarn. What really irritates me is that there are often about 10 changes but I can only revert them. Starfall2015 let's talk profile 15:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done. I think you are still relatively new here. Most of your edits have been in your own userspace, and your recent user talk page history shows that you have made some mistakes recently (which is totally fine, since you are new here). Please feel free to request this right again when you have more experience. I recommend looking into recent changes patrol and focusing on reverting instances of obvious vandalism (keyword: obvious—like adding gibberish to pages). Mz7 (talk) 02:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

While patrolling the recent changes, I often run into pending changes. I think I am a good candidate for this permission because I already revert vandalism prolifically. I have read WP:RPC and whenever I revert something that's not blatant vandalism/a BLP violation, I always include an adequate edit summary, so I would also be able to tell which pending changes are low-quality good-faith edits and let them through (with amendments after, possibly). I also never engage in edit wars or abuse my rollback function. Spotemgottem (talk) 08:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Mz7 (talk) 00:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)


Rollback

[edit]

I am respectfully requesting rollback rights as I am committed to upholding the quality and reliability of Wikipedia by actively monitoring recent changes and promptly reverting vandalism and unconstructive edits. Having familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, I believe that the rollback tool will allow me to more efficiently contribute to the maintenance of article integrity and the overall improvement of the encyclopedia. Vineyard93 (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 01:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
 Not done Hi Vineyard93, I am glad that you are interested in reverting vandalism, but I do not think you are ready for rollback. First, I see lots of reverts for what you call vandalism that are not followed up by warnings to the user. Second, I see some edits that you are reverting and calling vandalism are not vandalism. Instead, you are engaged in an edit war. In cases like these, you need to discuss your concerns with other users on the talk page and come to a consensus. Malinaccier (talk) 14:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I saw that rollbackers need 200+ edits and noticed that I've cleared that mark so here is my request:

I have been actively reverting vandalism via WP:RW and filters. I apply an adequate edit summary and warn for every single rollback I make using RedWarn. I understand clearly that rollback is for cases of clear-cut vandalism and other edits where the reason for the revert is obvious (such as uncited defamatory statements on a living person).

Whenever I encounter a good-faith yet low-quality edit, I either leave it be or undo it with a suitable custom edit summary (and a talkpage message explaining why the edit was reverted). Having this user right would allow me to try out Huggle which I believe would be more efficient than RedWarn's RC patrol or refreshing the browser. Thank you. Spotemgottem (talk) 00:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 179 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 22:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
Oops. I don't have 200 edits in the mainspace. Please ignore this request then. Spotemgottem (talk) 00:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) well, the 200 mainspace edits aren't an absolute requirement, and I've seen you doing good work at WP:RC enough to vouch for you. PS: you can use this tool to check your edits on separate namespaces. Good luck! Regards, — DVRTed (Talk) 05:19, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. I actually have 200 edits now. Spotemgottem (talk) 23:40, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've had several months of experience patrolling recent changes and clearing vandalism. In addition, I often revert sockpuppet edits. I therefore humbly request for the rollback right so that reverting obvious vandalism and sockpuppet/LTA edits (such as by using mass rollback) would be easier. I've read through WP:Rollback thoroughly as well. I understand that for the usual rollback, I need to try to use it with caution as it performs reverts in just one click/tap. Thank you. ~SG5536B 01:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done Mz7 (talk) 06:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I’m a very active recent changes patroller, very comfortable identifying vandalism and using WP:TW to revert, warn, and report vandals. I’m careful to avoid using immediate revert unless the edit is obviously vandalism. Rollback would allow me to more efficiently fight very active vandals before an administrator is able to block them. I would still use WP:TW in most cases, for routine recent changes patrol. ZachH007 22:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

I’ve been using Twinkle to revert vandalism from recent changes and warn users for a while now. I’ve been doing this for about two years, with some breaks because of school and life, but I’ve stayed consistent overall. I know what counts as vandalism and what doesn’t, and I always try to assume good faith. I’d really appreciate rollback to help make reverting quicker and save time. I can be trusted with the tool and use it properly. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 01:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi I am requesting rights to use the rollback feature as finding vandalism has actually been a very cool thing for me. I am requesting to be able so I don't have to undo multiple edits by spam-vandals, as I feel like it makes me kind of a spammer when I do this, and doing it all at once would be a great thing. I will admit that I had absolutely no idea that anyone could post warnings on talk pages, I thought that only admins and other experienced members who are given rights could do so. I just want to feel like less of a spammer when reverted edits, so I am requesting this rollback feature. Thanks, MakaylaHippo1998 MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Footer

[edit]

Policies and links

    DYK

    [edit]
    Count of DYK Hooks
    Section # of Hooks # Verified
    April 27 1
    April 29 1
    May 1 1
    May 2 2
    May 3 1
    May 5 2
    May 7 1
    May 9 1
    May 12 2
    May 13 1
    May 17 1
    May 20 2
    May 21 1
    May 22 3
    May 23 2 2
    May 25 3 2
    May 26 2 1
    May 27 4 3
    May 28 4 1
    May 29 1 1
    May 30 5 2
    May 31 2 1
    June 2 3 3
    June 3 2 2
    June 4 3 3
    June 5 6 4
    June 6 4 1
    June 7 6 4
    June 8 5 4
    June 9 4 3
    June 10 5 3
    June 11 7 5
    June 12 4 1
    June 13 9 2
    June 14 6 6
    June 15 7 6
    June 16 15 10
    June 17 10 7
    June 18 9 3
    June 19 8 4
    June 20 10 3
    June 21 12 5
    June 22 15 7
    June 23 16 10
    June 24 10 5
    June 25 6 2
    June 26 9 3
    June 27 10 4
    June 28 6 1
    June 29 5 1
    June 30 1 1
    Total 256 126
    Last updated 07:31, 30 June 2025 UTC
    Current time is 07:38, 30 June 2025 UTC [refresh]