User:Liz/Admin dashboard
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs
[edit]Administrative backlog
[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 7 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 1 |
| Spam pages | 7 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Other candidates | 37 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 215 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items
Requested RD1 redactions – No backlog currently
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
- RockDoc.edu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Coolie Driver 5204 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "coolie" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- GoldenAppleOfficial27 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Cvntianne (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "cvnt" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:10, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- CriticismAndControversies (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Thatoneweirdlookingperson (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheWriterofDigitalHistory (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Upturdou (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "turd" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:30, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- ToesTheChampionAndGreat6969 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Yummie1207 sucks, QuyQuang2043 is better (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "sucks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 09:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Username9283 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Corsarop (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. Edits relating to Paul Corsaro. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. PhilKnight (talk) 18:46, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Novarabetmusic (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:USERSTAGENAME. Stage name making promotional edits within Wikipedia about themselves, see Draft:Novarabet and User:Novarabetmusic/sandbox. Referentis (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Cabayi (talk) 16:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Stage names are absolutely fine. Secretlondon (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- International Karate Seiwakai Organization (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – WP:PROMONAME violation, as it's obviously a promotional username, containing "organization" as a forbidden term. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Yummie1207 sucks, QuyQuang2043 is better (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Ligaturama (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- User is g-locked no real need to block locally. Lavalizard101 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: IP vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 06:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – requesting semi-protection for the Inter Miami CF article due to a noticeable pattern of disruptive editing and promotional additions, particularly surrounding high-profile players like Lionel Messi and match coverage. While not strictly high-volume vandalism, there has been a recurring issue with new or unregistered editors making unsourced, speculative, or overly fan-driven changes, especially following match days or transfer rumors. This compromises article stability and requires frequent cleanup. Semi-protection would help ensure that edits come from more experienced contributors who are familiar with Wikipedia's content standards, while still allowing constructive editing through the edit request process. Vinizex94🌍 14:11, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Annh07 (talk) 16:00, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Several dynamic IPs edit-warring essayistic material into the article, general disruptive editing. Simonm223 (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism 88.97.192.42 (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recently being attacked by a user PawPatroler (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Constant barrage of disruptive edits from IP accounts that are being undone by users in the past several months. Asieon (talk) 02:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. M.Bitton (talk) 03:53, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Related to ARBPIA. He has commented mass statements supporting the Palestinians and commenting on Israel on interviews. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 06:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Too many people are editing the template to deviate from the last most recent banzuke; Ōnosato being given a yokozuna license because of his performance at the Natsu basho doesn't change the fact he fought the tournament at the rank of ōzkei. ArguaBILL (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recently fatally shot, lots of IPs have opinions on this case not supported by sources. Hot button issue given the circumstances. Requesting partial protection for a few weeks until things cool down. Harizotoh9 (talk) 12:39, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:54, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruption by a globally locked user now IP socking. Weirdguyz (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two recent disruptive edits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – uptick in recent IP vandalism. Nswix (talk) 13:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – the article is highly notable. Vinizex94🌍 13:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated insertions of spam links. FMSky (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Blocked some IPs. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:45, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Edit war between IP users (excluding me) regarding the show's cancellation. I would suggest a year (or six-month) page protection to prevent this from happening again. 100.10.59.247 (talk) 13:59, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This page was vandalized by anonymous users three times. Every restoration/correction has been re-vandalized using the same or similar questionable claims and nonsensical sources. Enix (talk) 14:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Constant Addition of Unsourced Content added by Ips Used by User:Tevin21 which is blocked from editing. Untamed1910 (talk) 15:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Stalker behavior. Wil540 art (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Related to the Russo-Ukrainian war, a contentious topic. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 17:20, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request protection for my page due to persistent vandalism and disruptive edits, particularly from anonymous users. The page has recently experienced malicious changes that appear to be targeted and coordinated, likely from individuals with a conflict of interest or intent to discredit.
To maintain the integrity of the article and prevent further disruption, I kindly request that the page be fully protected. We request a copy of the usernames and associated details of the individuals who performed the recent edits. After consulting with our legal advisors, we are considering legal action. Additionally, we would like to request the removal of the last four edits to the page, as they negatively impact our credibility. Please let us know if you require any further information from our side.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Ranjithramasamy1 (talk) 10:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Legal threats are not allowed on wikipedia. Additionally this is in the wrong section. Also as per Wikipedia:Ownership of content and Wikipedia:COI you can't own your own page. GalStar (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC) |
| 7 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC) |
RFA= Requests for adminship
RFP= Requests for permissions
Account creator
[edit]- Anonymous20242 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
To help people who cannot create their own account. Anonymous20242 (talk) 10:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
[edit]- BullDawg2021 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I have started 300+ pages and have been editing for over three and a half years consistently. Early on, I struggled with notability, but I have since demonstrated an understanding for the notability guidelines. I would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks, Bulldawg (talk) 06:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Done You've created an astonishing 80+ articles in the last two years, none of which have been deleted. A cursory review of a sample of BLPs finds no issues. You have a clean block log. In my opinion, granting Autopatrolled will benefit the workload of the NPP. Chetsford (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Throughthemind (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created a large number of articles, all without any significant issues. Another user proposed on my talk page that I request to be Autopatrolled. Throughthemind (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Throughthemind I think this would be a good idea to grant you Autopatrolled and you pass all the checks except one: I need to look at a sample of BLPs you've created. You're such a prolific writer, however, that I can't really comb through all your articles. Can you identify 3-5 BLPs you created in response to this message and ping me? Chetsford (talk) 19:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- IvanScrooge98 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Been around for 10 years. A new page reviewer (see here) encouraged me to request the autopatrolled rights over my page and redirect creation record. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Some of your given name and surname pages lack citations for the origins/meanings of the names. For example, the first sentence of Cencio has substantive information that requires a reference. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Added refs for Cencio. I’ll be more careful about sourcing info in lists. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- JohnMizuki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I came across this user in New Page Review. They are a prolific translator (with attribution!) of es-wiki pages on notable topics. Creates talk pages and problem-free articles. 76 mainspace articles created with no deletions. With JohnMizuki continuing to create new pages, granting the autopatrolled flag would help reduce the backlog of unreviewed articles. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- FromCzech (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Came across FromCzech in New Page Review and I wondered how this user is not already autopatrolled! Has created 165 mainspace pages with none deleted. Creates problem-free pages on notable topics with appropriate sources, including SIGCOV for athletes. Creates talk pages and selects useful categories. Already has the Page Mover perm; I think granting AP will assist with reducing the backlog for reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- Done Yes, I'm familiar with FromCzech's work and granting them Autopatrolled (whether they want it or not) would cut down NPP workload as their contributions are always par superior. (Indeed, they've improved many of my own articles.) Thank you for observing this oversight, Dclemens1971. Chetsford (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Carigval.97 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
The user has created an impressive total of 834 articles so far, with only five deletions. Given this strong track record, I believe they fully deserve autopatrolled rights. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Behappyyar (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am requesting the autopatrolled user right. I have created 86 articles so far, out of which only 2 have been deleted. Most of my articles are well-sourced biographies, mainly related to the Pakistan Army, with some focused on media personalities. I strive to follow Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing guidelines in all my contributions. Granting me autopatrolled status will help reduce the workload for new page reviewers. You may also consider taking suggestions from the reviewers (JTtheOG, John B123) who frequently review my pages, as they are familiar with the quality and consistency of my work. Behappyyar (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- AdaWoolf (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been creating pages for a year, and this would assist me when I create more AdaWoolf (talk) 00:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Confirmed
[edit]- Batchno-Nul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
For this time, I am requesting autoconfirmed user rights to substantially contribute to English Wikipedia by creating redirects, particularly for multilingual content as outlined in WP:NOENG. My curative goal is to efficiently create accurate redirects to enhance the project’s accessibility. Granting me these rights will allow me to begin contributing on this version of Wikipedia with proper standardisation. Thank you for considering my request. Batchno-Nul (talk) 03:30, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Page mover
[edit]- MediaKyle (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I first encountered a situation where the page mover permission would have been helpful when moving Michael Savage (politician) to Mike Savage (politician). Now as I continue developing content I ran into a situation where I need to move a ready article (Draft:Pottersfield Press) over a redirect I previously created (Pottersfield Press), and I foresee situations like this happening more, so now seems like a good time to figure out technical moves rather than continuing to ask others to do it. I intend to only use the page mover abilities for this purpose for the foreseeable future, and may start fulfilling uncontroversial move requests once I become sufficiently familiar with the process. Thanks. MediaKyle (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Mass message sender
[edit]- Dr. Blofeld (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am running contests like Wikipedia:The World Destubathon. It is a big attempt to eliminate thousands of stubs for every country and topic and want to invite a lot of project members personally with a message. User:DreamRimmer and User:Polygnotus have been very helpful, but it would greatly help me if I was given formal mass message rights as I will likely be running more contests in the future and need the easiest outlet to contact relevant projects and participants who would potentially be interested without having to spend ages doing it manually! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: If you mean inviting members of a lot of WikiProjects, as I gather from your talk page, then I think this would go against the guidance that
– SilverLocust (Jenson) 04:55, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Mass messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to want their attention drawn to the message [...] For other cases, less personalized means of communication are preferred. Wikipedia's primary means of communication is through posts on article talk pages, Wikipedia talk pages, or various noticeboards, including the Village Pump. [...] To reach the members of a given WikiProject, a post on that project's talk page can be used.
- I was thinking a few hundred of the most active editors, not 13,000! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer
[edit]- JamesEMonroe (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights:
To expand my tool belt as an extended confirmed recent changes patroller, and to more quickly afford new users their non policy breaking contribution. I have currently no sanctions against me and I think I understand wiki policy well enough for it. Thank you JamesEMonroe (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2025 (UTC) (Post edit) When using this perm, I will take extra care. I think I have met requirements in WP:PCCRITERIA and have reviewed Wikipedia policy. Also please consider older reverts as well or when I took the time to explain things to new users. JamesEMonroe (talk) 21:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi JamesEMonroe! I am not formally granting this permission (nor am I denying it), but I do think you should cut back a bit on the WP:STICKYDECO stuff on your userpage. While I have added the applicable CSS class to make the gadget function, many newbies—who frequently will have complaints when you revert their edits—will be unaware of the ability to tick the box to disable them, and they can be highly annoying/distracting/problematic for editors with sensory issues.
I wouldn't object if another admin chooses to grant the permission, but I wouldn't personally feel comfortable assigning newbie-interaction-heavy advanced permissions with the current amount of sticky decorations. Best regards, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 02:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)- Ah, Thank you! As you saw, I tried to add the collapsible boxes as a way for people to disable them (like the "clutter clear ->") as collapsing it would disable the code within. I was planning on making some changes actually, such as rearranging things and improving accessibility a bit, while always importantly keeping the talk page free from anything as it is. I hope it didn't appear unprofessional on me or too annoying.
- But I see what you mean as some newer people might not see the boxes. and ill see what I could do. JamesEMonroe (talk) 04:15, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- @JamesEMonroe: On the default skin (Vector 2022) your Einstein gif blocks the "talk" button, the left molecule gif blocks the entire left sidebar, and the gifs on the right side block much of the right sidebar plus the "ClutterClear" button. That disrupts the interface by "preventing important links or controls from being easily seen or used". I would also urge you to fix that. – SilverLocust (Jenson) 06:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Good call. I removed it.
- I didn't want to block the user talk page especially JamesEMonroe (talk) 06:43, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- I guess it makes it hard when its fine on my screen but possibly different on others. let me see with the other things. sorry about that ^^ JamesEMonroe (talk) 06:48, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @JamesEMonroe: On the default skin (Vector 2022) your Einstein gif blocks the "talk" button, the left molecule gif blocks the entire left sidebar, and the gifs on the right side block much of the right sidebar plus the "ClutterClear" button. That disrupts the interface by "preventing important links or controls from being easily seen or used". I would also urge you to fix that. – SilverLocust (Jenson) 06:28, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Arc Rev (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèv • talk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. — MusikBot talk 10:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Wieditor25 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- Danners430 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
A few pages which I watch were tagged for pending changes protection, and I would like to assist in reviewing the changes to share the workload. Danners430 (talk) 05:14, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Weirdguyz (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Most of my editing is in recent changes patrolling, and I understand the policies regarding vandalism, BLP, NPOV, copyright, etc. and apply them appropriately. Weirdguyz (talk) 06:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- MouseCursor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm requesting pending changes reviewer as a current often-active extended-confirmed pending changes reviewer who wants to combat vandalism on pending changes-protected pages. I have read the guideline on reviewing and understand the policies on BLP, copyright, etc. Thanks! MouseCursor or a keyboard? 13:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Element10101 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello; I wish to request pending changes reviewer rights.
By now, I have been editing Wikipedia for a month, more or less. I have extended-confirmed permissions on Wikipedia. I have done some work in cleaning up new pages and recent changes and I am ready to start taking on a larger task of reviewing pending changes. Element10101 T ~ C 20:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- 2RDD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Please, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help ensure the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to review and improve articles, and I'm committed to using my Pending Changes Reviewer tools responsibly. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's quality control efforts 2RDD (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Cameremote (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi there, I have been creating articles for the Nigerian Portal on Wikipedia for over five months now. I'd like to have this role to expand my editing jurisdiction. Thanks Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:26, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ophyrius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Re-requesting the Pending Changes granted by Mz7 to my comprised old account. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Sardonism (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi there!
Despite my account having existed since 2009, I have only 450 edits - and so it is more than reasonable for one to question whether I am a sufficiently experienced Wikipedian to be granted additional privileges.
I am requesting Pending changes reviewer as I believe I have demonstrated a good faith effort to contribute to the project, civility when interacting with other users, and adequate judgement when attempting to discern between deliberate vandalism or well-intentioned mistakes. But more than anything, I seek to find relevant policies and / or guidelines when confronted with a new (to me) situation - and while I endeavour to be WP:BOLD, I am aware of my own limitations and thus I know when to stop and ask others for guidance before proceeding.
If granted Pending changes reviewer I cannot promise I would be a prolific reviewer of pending changes; merely that when reviewing pending changes I would ensure I am doing it because I am confident in my ability to get that decision right, rather than out of boredom or a desire / sense of obligation to make the decision myself.
Thank you very much for your time & consideration.
Rollback
[edit]- PunjabiEditor69 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I need rollback rights to revert vandalism. I have reverted some vandalism attempts. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has 165 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 11:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have 216 edits now. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): Hello, @PunjabiEditor69! I've checked your contributions was 16 undo edits and 444 namespace articles. I'm not ready to grant the permission. Next time you spend at least a month of experience patrolling; see Special:RecentChanges. Thanks! –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I will apply after at least 30 days of experience patrolling. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to treat that as
Request withdrawn * Pppery * it has begun... 19:10, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to treat that as
- Okay, I will apply after at least 30 days of experience patrolling. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): Hello, @PunjabiEditor69! I've checked your contributions was 16 undo edits and 444 namespace articles. I'm not ready to grant the permission. Next time you spend at least a month of experience patrolling; see Special:RecentChanges. Thanks! –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:49, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have 216 edits now. - PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2RDD (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm 2RDD, I've been actively contributing to Wikipedia for a year and have a good understanding of its policies and guidelines. I'm interested in becoming a rollbacker to help maintain the quality and integrity of Wikipedia's content. I've demonstrated my ability to resolve conflicts and address vandalism in a constructive manner. I'm committed to using my rollbacker tools responsibly and in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. I'm looking forward to the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia's maintenance and upkeep. Thank you 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Cameremote (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'm dropping a request here aswell. Please do consider me request for the Rollback Permission. Thanks. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 00:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment)Hi, Cameremote! I see that you only have 5 undos in total. Are sure that you have read the criteria for rollback carefully? It's only granted to users who have some experience in dealing with vandalism. If you want to withdraw this request, you can type
{{withdrawn}}in the wikitext mode. Cheers! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 10:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- TheArcRev (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello there, I am requesting rollback permission. With my contributions, I am particular with BLP articles. I know what unconstructive edits are. I read the guidelines, and I am also aware of what the difference is between good faith and disruptive. I do, but I'm not very good at patrolling recent changes due to my devices' capabilities, but I want to contribute to decreasing vandalism in Wikipedia to the best that I can. I have read the guidelines for rollback permission, and I guarantee you that I will have the responsibility of having this permission. Thank you. - ArćRèv • talk 11:34, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Macaw* (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! I am requesting rollback rights to aid in reverting vandalism. I am mostly requesting the permission to use tools like Huggle and AntiVandal. I have read through the relevant policies and belive I meet the requirements for rollbacker. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to ask me. Best wishes, Macaw*! 16:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ophyrius (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I'm requesting rollback to use tools such as Antivandal & M:SWViewer. My previous request was pretty messed up. This userright will be very helpful to me in reverting Vandalism. Thanks! Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs⚔ 09:57, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Template editor
[edit]- 4vryng (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
This will equip me with the ability to edit and improve/update templates, and allow me to assist however else I can with template editing. I have extensive experience on wikipedia if you look at my user history so I will not be abusing this ability. 4vryng (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
(guideline: >1 year, applicant: 20 years)- (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~16,000)
- (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 413)
- (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: 18 years)
(guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 0)- (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 0)
Not done for lack of demonstrated need - you only need this permission to edit some high-risk templates, and can edit most others and can make edit requests for the few you can't. Feel free to re-request when you meet the standard granting criteria. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
- Standard Guidelines review:
Footer
[edit]Policies and links