Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Entertainment

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Entertainment. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Entertainment|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Entertainment. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch


Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of world champions in WWE born outside the United States

List of world champions in WWE born outside the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be original research and fancruft. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 08:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason as bundle AFD:

List of WWE male wrestlers born outside the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of NJPW male wrestlers born outside Japan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of WWE female wrestlers born outside the United States (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

BinaryBrainBug (talk) 09:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an engagement to reach consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HilssaMansen19 (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 Talk Work 10:15, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teee Dollar of Lagos

Teee Dollar of Lagos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable TikToker. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:33, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:40, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Sperry

AfDs for this article:
Dan Sperry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet notability criteria for entertainers per notability guidelines for people (WP:BIO), and the article lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Chive Cream Cheese (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seems to also be a WP:PROMO article written by a possible WP:SPA. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Clearly a promotion. No real sourcing and no establishment of notability in the article. Not enough for a stand alone article. Ramos1990 (talk) 05:55, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to MrBeast. per consensus. – robertsky (talk) 03:57, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MrBeast (company)

MrBeast (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicates scope of MrBeast, Talk:MrBeast#Splitting proposal is not a convincing discussion enough for me. it's lio! | talk | work 18:38, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect Redirect it back to MrBeast. There isn't anything here that isn't covered there and this is likely to be duplicative. The current state of the splitting proposal is largely in favor of no split despite a few calls for a separate page about the company. Unless a new article can be created that is not mostly duplicative then there is not reason for this split. Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 22:31, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The MrBeast (company) article warrants retention as it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for organizations and companies. According to WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH, a company is notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources—not just trivial mentions or routine announcements.
== Distinct Corporate Entity with Independent Coverage ==
While Jimmy Donaldson is a well-known YouTube personality, Beast Industries—the corporate umbrella for his ventures—has evolved into a multi-division media and consumer business. In 2024, the company reportedly generated $473 million in revenue, with 2025 projections nearing $899 million.
  • Beast Industries has launched multiple notable businesses that extend well beyond the individual:
    • Feastables – a snack brand with $215 million in 2024 revenue.[1]
    • Beast Games – a high-budget competition series acquired by Amazon Prime, now its most-watched unscripted show.[2]
    • MrBeast Lab – a toy brand in partnership with Moose Toys, generating $65 million in six months.[3]
== Legal and Structural Developments ==
The company has also been involved in legal matters, including a lawsuit over labor conditions during the filming of "Beast Games."[4] These legal and organizational dynamics reinforce its corporate independence from Donaldson’s biography.
== Not a Fork or Redundant ==
This is not a case of WP:CFORK. The current article *can* be improved with better structure and inline sourcing, but its subject matter and long-term notability merit a standalone entry. A merger would conflate a living person's biography with a fast-growing corporate brand operating in multiple sectors. In line with other creator-owned enterprises (e.g., PewDiePie, Hello Games, Dude Perfect), this topic has standalone merit.
Recommendation: Keep and expand rather than delete or redirect. Vinizex94🌍 13:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Tenbarge, Kat. "MrBeast made $473 million last year. Here's a breakdown of how he did it". Business Insider. Retrieved 11 May 2025.
  2. ^ Arthur, Kate (27 February 2025). "MrBeast's Amazon Prime Show Is the Most-Watched Unscripted Series on the Platform". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 May 2025.
  3. ^ "MrBeast is building the next Disney. Investors are listening". Business Insider. Retrieved 11 May 2025.
  4. ^ "MrBeast wiki page". Fandom. Retrieved 11 May 2025.
This is obviously AI generated; large language models do not have voting privileges. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:52, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a real editor, and I stand by my comment, ok. It may read formally, but that doesn't make it invalid. Let's focus on the content of the argument, not assumptions about how it was written. Yes, I also agree to at least redirect, or merge it. But definetly not deleting it. Vinizex94🌍 14:18, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Sonya Deville#Various alliances (2021–2025). Liz Read! Talk! 05:05, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pure Fusion Collective

Pure Fusion Collective (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short lived team with no significant achievements. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 14:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have made a quick search. [1] Lack of in-deep coverage around the stable. Mostly WP:ROUTINE --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 11:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any support for ATD redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 01:32, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:18, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glamarella

AfDs for this article:
Glamarella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tag team lasting less than a year with very few notable appearances. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 14:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 19:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, tellingly, Newspapers.com has nothing, and searches of other databases did not find reliable sources with sigcov. It is mentioned in the articles of both members, and I think that's the treatment it deserves. Please do ping if anyone finds more. Eddie891 Talk Work 10:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Allin Kempthorne

Allin Kempthorne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've AFD'd this, but actually I think it should be redirected to Wriggler (video game). There doesn't appear to be any independent, reliable sources giving significant coverage to the subject of this article. Sourcing is all tabloid news (The Mirror, The Sun, Metro) or passing mentions. Simply appearing on BGT (and not being recognised...) does not indicate notability. Simply being a bit-part actor in numerous films does not indicate notability. Additionally I have WP:PROMO/WP:COI concerns here.

They wrote the ZX Spectrum game Wriggler together with their twin when they were at school, and this game is clearly notable, but nothing else they have done appears to be notable.

Also nominating The Vampires of Bloody Island for deletion (no need to redirect this), which is the film Allin Kempthorne created. The only coverage that could be found for this is blatantly promotional ("we were forced to bring forward the release of this film because of an email campaign that no-one but us is the source for existing") and from sources of dubious reliability. Simply being nominated for a Twitter Shorty Award does not indicate notability.

Similarly also Learning Hebrew for the same reasons.FOARP (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:47, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Because there are three articles under review, I think this needs more eyes.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:43, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary championships in WWE

Secondary championships in WWE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another fancraft article just like Secondary championships in All Elite Wrestling. Relevant content exist already on several other articles such as List of former championships in WWE. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually your argument proves why this article should be deleted. The age of article does not matter at all. Some articles remain for several years on WP, and then someday the community decide to delete them. You created this article in 4 December 2023, so you had plenty of time to improve it (which I doubt it, because the topic itself is redundant). If you think those articles have similar issues like yours, feel free to nominate them for deletion. --Mann Mann (talk) 02:24, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You guys are correct, I recognize that I let my soft spot for this article overtake logic and I apologize. I do think the other ones should be put up for deletion as well, it's just saddening to see it go. Selar0m (talk) 05:44, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:33, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Entertainment in Uganda

Entertainment in Uganda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Loose collection of different "entertainment" topics. Doesn't really provide any extra value as a list. (WP:LISTPURP) --JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 03:19, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:07, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary championships in All Elite Wrestling

Secondary championships in All Elite Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mostly fancraft content with the relevant parts already at List of current champions in All Elite Wrestling and rest of the championship articles. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 12:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Alton Towers#Main Past Attractions. Eddie891 Talk Work 08:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Twirling Toadstool

Twirling Toadstool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in RS PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for a Redirection or Deletion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:34, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trackloaded

Trackloaded (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. Fails NCORP or the GNG. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep – Trackloaded meets the General Notability Guideline (GNG) through significant coverage in independent, reliable sources:
    • Mentioned in Pulse Nigeria, referencing its lyrics/media section
    • Cited by Legit.ng in entertainment industry commentary
    • Awarded "Best Entertainment News Media Platform" by MEA Markets in 2024
    • Recognized as "Best Entertainment & Media Platform – West Africa" at Innovation in Business Awards 2024
    • Reached 4.4 million listeners on Audiomack, indicating real-world cultural and public impact

The article is neutrally written and sourced to meet the notability criteria under both GNG and NCORP for media-related topics. It documents a notable Nigerian digital platform with verified third-party recognition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oloyede2003 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Nigeria. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Norlk (talk) 15:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:51, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Steppin' Out (magazine)

Steppin' Out (magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable magazine that is apparently out of publication. Unable to find any sources discussing it. The single source that was standing to the article is to a website that was removed or otherwise blacklisted from archive.org, which is a red flag. Further, about the only thing I found on this publication indicates that its last article was published about four years ago. Probably fails other specific notability guidelines, but it's a clear WP:GNG fail. —C.Fred (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree. Delete 162.213.23.84 (talk) 23:27, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It should be deleted but there was no need for that stuff on my Talk page. I didn't have any rude attitude towards editors at all. I did nothing wrong and was removing unsourced crap from that page. I was totally in the right dude. 162.213.23.84 (talk) 23:30, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I stumbled on this while doing spam cleanup (the home page has been usurped by the infamous WP:JUDI gang). Looking at the Wayback Machine, the site has been around for about 20 years. That's a long time. Surely there would be coverage about it somewhere, to write an article with. Today is AfD Day 7 (doomsday). Encourage anyone who has the time to really check around for sources. -- GreenC 15:21, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete sourcing just isn't there to support notability. Mondo Times seems to list every publication that exists and relies on company-submitted information. It only has 3 sentences of coverage and probably isn't a reliable source anyway. --Here2rewrite (talk) 22:41, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral for now This one is kind of a bummer; going by their Facebook page it looks like they were an early business that died right at COVID because it served as more of a New York metro (more Jersey side specifically) events guide, a la the Village Voice but in the more suburban magazine form and with a focus on local celebrities. I know regional Jersey and NYC coverage is there, but it might be rare and more things like the New York Post picking up on a photoshoot or interview as print media usually doesn't cover other print media. Nathannah • 📮 02:47, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without prejudice to recreation if better sourcing is found, per WP:TNT. Darkfrog24 (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete looks like some before has been done, will include a delete to end the afd unless better sources are found. -- GreenC 16:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. per improvements made and sourcing identified Star Mississippi 03:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Baker (entertainer)

AfDs for this article:
Matthew Baker (entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was nominated by Badbluebus back in February, and was closed as a soft delete, with only one other editor !voting for delete. No oppose votes. There simply is not enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show that they pass notability. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 13:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:18, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 04:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The image File:Bowling-head-sharp.jpg is AI-generated. I have nominated it for deletion on Commons. I haven't checked the sources yet, but it seems this article was created by the editor who uploaded that image, mostly in one huge edit (diff). Toadspike [Talk] 10:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hm, the sources in that diff seem okay. I think Dclemens1971's sources show that he meets the GNG – some of them include lots of quotes, which are not independent, but they also review his performances (not always positively), which is clearly independent coverage to me. I'm going with keep on notability. Toadspike [Talk] 10:59, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The main significant coverage I see is Guinness world record, but barely. Aside from that, not sure of he is that notable. Last time this was nominated (March of 2025) it was deleted. Ramos1990 (talk) 05:22, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep I read the sources linked by Dclemens1971 and to me, they clearly establish notability. I completely disagree with Oaktree's assessment and would encourage the closing admin to actually glance through them. The Seattle Times article and the Oklahoman articles are far, far above the threshold needed to meet WP:SIGCOV - he is interviewed and discussed in depth in the Seattle Times piece and his name is mentioned over 17 times. His name is literally in the title of the Oklahoman article. FlipandFlopped ㋡ 21:08, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: alright, as a closing admin, I've followed Flipandflopped's advice so the actual closing admin doesn't have to: this is obvious sigcov. I assume Oaktree has some kind of browser extension that is blocking the articles from expanding fully. -- asilvering (talk) 23:42, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Categories

Proposed deletions

Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Entertainment&oldid=1290354639"