Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Washington

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Washington. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Washington|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Washington. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Washington/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Washington

Jonathan Caparelli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails to meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV from reliable secondary sources. The current sources are all primary to clubs the subject played for and all I could find elsewhere was a single paragraph of coverage at [[1]]. Let'srun (talk) 02:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Argentina, Arizona, California, Tennessee, and Washington. Let'srun (talk) 02:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Let'srun (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:SIGCOV so fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. Non-notable football player. Surayeproject3 (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cat Daddy Games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Attempts to delete/redirect were reversed multiple times, so an AfD is required under policy. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:31, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Washington. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:31, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Was there discussion of a redirect? What did a BEFORE find? Jclemens (talk) 20:28, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was attempted to be redirected to 2K Games. It gets a brief mention there, too brief to really merit even a redirect IMO, but it could be valid if people believe it's necessary. None of the people who recreated the article demonstrated any sources, and were largely WP:SPA editors who may have been doing it for promotional reasons, nor could I find any non-trivial sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:13, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - To either 2K (company) or Take-Two Interactive. Doesn't matter in my opinion since they both wind up at the same place. Regardless of how many games it has developed, it is still a company and would be required to meet WP:NCORP by way of WP:CORPDEPTH-type coverage. I am not finding any. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. There are two different suggested target articles. Which one is preferred?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 2K (company)#Studios. Subject is more closely related to 2K than Take-Two in general. Go D. Usopp (talk) 08:19, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions (WP:PROD)

Deletion Review