Jump to content

Wikipedia:HighBeam/Prior applications

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:HighBeam
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CennoxX (talk | contribs) at 15:26, 29 October 2014 (→Round 8: +1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Wikipedia:Highbeam/Nav This is an archive of prior applications. New applications should be listed at Wikipedia:HighBeam. Thanks!

Applications--April 9th round (delivered by the 16th)

These were sent out successfully April 16th. A minority of the codes failed to deliver because recipients' email addresses were not enabled. If you didn't get your code, drop a note on my talk page Ocaasi t | c 01:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Feel free to add your name below, but no applications will be considered until Monday, April 2, 2012 at 10am Eastern Standard Time (EST). If there is a shortage, applications will be given on a random basis to all who meet the basic qualifications. Please tell your wiki-friends, WikiProjects, and other fora you frequent about this opportunity.

  1. User:BarkingFish. English Wikipedia: 6928 edits, total globally: 10,514, administrator to tpi.wikipedia.org - Content contribution and correction in many areas, moving slowy into dealing with verifiability and correctness as well as building articles about Physiology, Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Trauma, as well as Pharmacology. Looking to continue this work for a long time, here and at simple.wikipedia also.  BarkingFish  00:26, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. user:Hgrosser English Wikipedia. 2300+ edits since Nov. 2005. Created the articles San Patricio Church massacre and Pussy Riot (the first on any wiki). — Hgrosser (talk) 06:16, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Vejvančický. English Wikipedia. 4 years of experience, cca 24,000 edits, content related work (content creation, verification, referencing, deletion (mainly CAT:CSD), deletion discussions), WP:ADMIN, WP:CREDO. The access could be very useful for my work. Thanks for considering this application. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 13:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:Orangemike Admin on English-language Wikipedia; 8 years experience, 81,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) where access to Highbeam would be useful. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:35, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Gobonobo. English Wikipedia. ~4 years experience, 40,000 edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, referencing). Intend to work on 20th century biographies and the backlog at Category:BLP articles lacking sources. --Gobōnobo + c 16:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Racconish. English, French and Italian Wikipedias. 3 years experience, 19,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) where access to Highbeam would be useful.— Racconish Tk 17:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Pharaoh of the Wizards English Wikipedia . 5 Years experience ,38000 + edits ,content-related work (content creation,expansion, verification, referencing) access to Highbeam will be very useful.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Prioryman English Wikipedia. Between this and a former account, 8 years' experience and about 60,000 edits, primarily in content creation (see my userpage for various FAs, GAs, DYKs and other articles I've written). Prioryman (talk) 20:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Wehwalt English Wikipedia. 5 years experience, almost 70,000 edits. Over 60 FAs in various fields, especially history, politics, and numismatics. Plan to keep working in those areas. See my userpage, although I don't update it much.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Nikthestoned, English Wikipedia. ~2 years experience, >17,000 edits almost all in content creation / expansion; over 70 well sourced articles created. Nikthestoned 12:35, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:Dravecky, English-language Wikipedia, nearly 5 years experience and over 74,000 edits, am an admin but spend most of my time in content creation, especially broadcasting, Alabama and Texas history, and other areas that would benefit strongly from access to Highbeam's resources. - Dravecky (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Resolute, English Wikipedia, 7 years experience and 37,000 edits. Like Dravecky, I am a content admin, with 50 good and featured articles to my credit. I tend to focus on ice hockey and Canadian history topics. Resolute 14:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:Djsasso, English Wikipedia and Simple English Wikipedia, 7+ years of experience and 90,000 edits. -DJSasso (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:MikeLynch, English and Sanskrit language Wikipedia, admin in both. ~2 years of experience and over 20,000 global edits. Active in content creation in English as well as Indian language Wikimedia projects. Lynch7 14:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Vibhijain, English Wikipedia, 1 year of experience. 8500 local edits and 20,000 global edits. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:The ed17, English Wikipedia, 4 years of experience, 39,000 edits, administrator. I've written 20 FAs, all focused around 20th century naval history. I'm really interested in the newspaper archives offered by Highbeam (see South American dreadnought race for how I'd use them). Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Aschmidt (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2005, some 13,000 edits there, editing articles mainly on law, economics, media, current affairs, free software. The newspaper and journal archive would be a great help both for improving and for writing new articles on my subjects. Thanks for considering my application.--Aschmidt (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Liesel (talk) 15:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC) german wikipedia since 2005, over 22000 edits in articles, themes: railroad, motorsport, geography[reply]
  19. --Nicola54 (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2004, some 57.000 edits, editing articles mainly on history of sports and cycling. The archive would help me to find out more about biographies of veteran sports people and historical sports events.[reply]
  20. Polarlys German Wikipedia, active since 2004, 49000 edits, 31000 in articles, topics: medicine, scientists/biographies, regularly had no access especially to newspaper archives for essential biographic information. Thank you for consideration. --Polarlys (talk) 16:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Emeritus German Wikipedia, 8000 edits since 2009, topics: Pacific history and politics, indigenous peoples. --Emeritus (talk) 16:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. DerHexer, editor since 2005; sysop on German and English Wikipedia, steward on Meta Wiki; 250'000 edits; 900'000 sysop actions; one featured and one good article (dozens written with main topic antiquity), three featured pictures (thousands uploaded); after having finished my Master thesis in summer 2012 I will not anylonger have access to journal archives.
  23. SlimVirgin, English Wikipedia, editor since November 2004; 120,000 edits, around 42 percent to articles, mainly focusing on content review and creation, including 10 featured articles and one GA. I write a lot of current affairs pieces, so access to a good news database would be very useful. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC) - editor and author since 2003 in the German WP, lots of edits, ~100 good article (‘lesenswert’) and ~50 featured (‘exzellent’) ones in the German WP -- Achim Raschka (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. NiTenIchiRyu, German and English Wikipedia editor since 2004, about 35,000 edits in the German and 1500 in the English Wikipedia, topics: history, biographies, art. --NiTen (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ruud Koot, content creator on the English (and occasionally Dutch) Wikipedia since 2005. Working in particular on topics related to (the history of) science.
  27. Astynax, English Wikipedia, editor since 2006; 8,000 edits, approximately 74 percent to articles which include raising 10 to FA and 13 to GA status. I assist on various topics where the ability to provide citations from a news database would be helpful. • Astynax talk 17:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Denis Barthel (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC), German Wikipedia (sometimes en), active since 2003, ~51.000 edits de, ~57.000 edits global, ~50 good and featured articles, topics: protozoology, botany, music (experimental, doom metal), quality TV.[reply]
  29. Zero0000 (talk), Editor since 2003 (over 15,000 edits), administrator since 2004. Mainly I edit historical articles related to the Middle East, with the particular emphasis of improving the quality of sources. Zerotalk 19:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Marcus Cyron, Editor since 2005, Administrator en de:WP and Commons, more than 165.000 Edits in all WMDE projects (about 145.000 in de:WP; more than 15.000 on Commons; Author of more than 5.000 articles on de:WP, more than 30 are featured or good (mostly about the Classical world and Winter sports). And thanks again for showing, that only en:WP is important for the movement. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Binksternet, editing English Wikipedia for 4.6 years, top 300 users by edit count, with 2 FA, 35 GA and 134 DYK articles under my belt. I work primarily on article content, and I often find that Highbeam is holding a source that would greatly assist my work. Binksternet (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. tsor: user and administrator in de:WP, first edit July 2003, more than 81.000 edits. --Tsor (talk) 20:04, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Elitre (talk · contribs · count) requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. > 20,000 edits there (> 6700 in ns0) in 5 years, major contributor of a FA (1, 2, article stats), user of "Progetto Cococo" (local WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), sysop, OTRS agent. No access to reference works except for my Credo Account: I am going to notify the Italian community the same way I did for the Credo accounts, enabling some Italian fellow to get theirs. ----Elitre (talk) 20:14, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Freimut Bahlo, editor since July 2007, 55,963 edits, Author of more than 2.000 articles on de:WP, part of the community Project jazz. 1 informative list (‘informative Liste’), 1 good article (‘lesenswert’) and 1 featured (‘exzellent’) in the German WP--Freimut Bahlo (talk) 20:20, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Anmeldezeitpunkt: 16. Juli 2007[reply]
  35. Redlinux editor since 2006; sysop on German Wikipedia and mentoring (with the largest number of mentees in de-wiki) (i.e. Adopt a User in en-wiki); cause I'm living in a rural area, I don't have access to journal archives. Most of my qualified articles [1] are on medical topics. Redlinux···→ 21:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. valepert (talk · contribs · count) requesting an account for my activity on it.wiki. sysop with > 88,000 edits in 6 years, user of "Progetto Cococo" (italian equivalent for WikiProject Copyright Cleanup), I have a Credo account. --valepert (talk) 21:24, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Sannita. Admin on Italian Wikipedia since 2007, 6+ years experience and 47k+ edits. I currently work mostly on biographies (both BLPs and BDPs), and accessing to Highbeam would be definitely useful. I already have a Credo account, which I use also to help other users. Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 21:27, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Toter Alter Mann − sysop on German Wikipedia, some 20k edits; mentor and active editor for three years now. Mainly biology, but also a lot of cleanup, research and verification in the social sciences. I am further participating at the German WP:REX (de:WP:BIBA). I have a Credo account which I mainly used for helping other people with their articles.--Toter Alter Mann (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Olei. German Wikipedia, active since 2005, ~24.000 edits de, ~40,000 edits global, topics: biology (insecta, lepidoptera) --Olei (talk) 22:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Muscari. German Wikipedia, active since 2007, ~38.000 edits de, topics: biology (botany, herpetology, entomology,...) --Muscari (talk) 22:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Asdalol. Editor since 2007 on It.wiki, more than 10.000 edits on ns0. Actually working on biographies, history of sports. I don't have access to a journal archive, the HighBeam account would be very useful. --Asdalol (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Nicolabel: sysop on Italian Wikipedia since 2011, user since 2005, ~12500 edits. Active mostly in cleanup/verification activities and geography, occasionally in other fields. I got a credo account in 2011. --Nicolabel (talk) 22:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Etrusko25: Italian wikipedia, working mostly in ichthyology and fish biology. Etrusko25 (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Vituzzu: sysop and bureaucrat on the Italian Wikipedia and steward ~63.000 edits global, my main interests are modern and contemporary history and information technology. --Vituzzu (talk) 23:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:Lucas: Italian Wikipedia. I am sysop on the Italian Wikipedia since 2006. I did more than 45.000 global edits. I am interested in psychology, communication, and modern history (expecially the biographies side). --Lucas (talk) 01:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Ansuman: English Wikipedia and Odia Wikipedia, Admin on Odia Wikipedia. 1+ year of experience and over 8500 global edits. Active in various Wikimedia Projects. -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 06:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Agathoclea en & de-wiki, 20k+ edits, admin here. As my time is currently limited due to work commitments please disregard if oversubscribed. Agathoclea (talk) 08:12, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. WiseWoman: German Wikipedia, active since 2004, 2000+ edits; English Wikipedia active since 2004, 470+ edits; Swedish Wikipedia since 2007, 27 edits. I do mostly cleanup, but when I create articles they tend to be about women who are missing in the Wikipedia. It is often hard to come by information on them, so additional resources much appreciated. --WiseWoman (talk) 08:16, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Martin Bahmann (talk) German Wikipedia, active since 2004, ~33.000 edits de, 11 good and 7 featured articles, topics (mainly) history, especially local/roman/german history, biographies, plants, botany and - the "fun part" for me as contributor - cat breeds & veterinary medicine. Martin Bahmann (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. User:Demostene119: Italian Wikipedia 6.000+ edits from 2006, Credo Account, main interest in mineralogy, paleontology and modern and contemporary history.Demostene119 (talk) 09:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. User:Emha: Active in German Wikipedia since 2004 (>9.000 edits) and on Commons, I write about persons and geographical topics and do Quality assurance, where it is useful to lookup details -- Emha (talk) 10:26, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:Bramfab: Italian wikipedia, since 2006 and sysop, editing (40.000+) mostly in earth science, evolutionary biology, history of science and Italian history. I'm quite active on verification of correctness of dubious citation in articles --Bramfab (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. User:ca$e: active in German Wikipedia since 2005, >39.000 edits, ArbCom, coordination of work in areas of philosophy, religious studies, among other areas in humanities and social sciences. Ca$e (talk) 12:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --Belladonna2 (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC):German Wikipedia, editing 8000 edits since 2007, mostly in botanical sciences, gender sciences, genetically modified organism and ecology.--Belladonna2 (talk) 12:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Over 16000 edits English Wikipedia. Edit on philately, history, art, postal system. Hoping it will access local newspapers I usually can't view. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. theredmonkey: German Wikipedia editor since 2005; >4000 edits; editing and verification in social science --trm 15:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Secret account 15:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC) Member since 2005, over 35,000 edits in my former two accounts and this one, was a former administrator and I have several FAs to my credit. Highbeam will be extremely useful in my subject area, Baseball history, American football history and current hip hop articles. Secret account 15:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Andrea.gf Editor and former admin on italian wiki, active since 2005 with 7000+ edits, mainly content-related work (creation, expansion and verification) where access to Highbeam would be very useful. Andrea.gf (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Avraham. Active since late 2005. Wide area of edits (mathematics, religion, geopolitics, etc.). I often focus on updating and maintaining citations, so HighBeam access would be a fantastic resource. (Other info, FWIW: ENWP: Admin, crat, OS, CU; COM: Admin, OS; Meta: Admin, Steward) Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. InverseHypercube. Active on the English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons since late 2010, with 8000+ edits on Wikipedia. I edit a wide variety of articles, but tend to focus on science, computers, history, and current events. I do have access to many sources through the University of British Columbia, so please prioritize others before me. However, HighBeam does seem to have valuable sources that I can't access, so I would appreciate the opportunity to use it if there are spots available. InverseHypercube (talk) 20:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Ziko, see my page on meta. Ziko (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Wildtierreservat, de.wp editor since 2008, ~6000 edits, ~50 articles. This would be a great help for my articles on writers. --Wildtierreservat (talk) 23:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Kmhkmh. I'm primarily active in en.wp (6000+ edits) and de.wp (25000+ edits) for more than 5 years now, mostly in the fields of math, sciences, history, biography, geography, movies, literature, food & drink. Since I'm not affiliated with an university anymore, I lack any sort of free journal access, hence highbeam might prove extremely valuable for me when writing new articles or improving/proofreading existing ones.--Kmhkmh (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Riggr Mortis. Editor on en.wp since 2006 (with prior User:Outriggr). Would edit more in arts and literature with improved (any) access to resources. Riggr Mortis (talk) 04:13, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Ureinwohner German Wikipedia, active since 2004, ~66.000 edits, focus on creating and expanding footballer biographies (UK, Australia, Africa), the newspaper archive would be really useful --Ureinwohner (talk) 08:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Rsrikanth05, Have an account since 2005, though active editing started in late 2008. As of today, I've got 12k edits on English. I've worked on a GA (Transport in India, and a DYK (Coimbatore bypass). I regularly hunt for refs to add to articles where they aren't present, or are needed. I plan to work on various Transport related articles in the future, and having this would be a great asset. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Mirgolth French Wikipedia. Active since 2005 (>20K edits), I write marine zoology articles. I'm currently writing on Anemonefishes and I intend to continue with major fishes families (Scaridae, Labridae, Chaetonidae, Pomacanthidae...). I'm mostly using public papers anly and access to Copeia and other zoology publications would help a lot. Mirgolth (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Cymbella French Wikipedia (and sometimes also other languages). Active since 2007, ~23.000 edits, eclectic contributions, namely botany, history of botany, disambiguation, spelling corrections. - Cymbella (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. User:MIRROR, active since 2006 on fr.wiki. 8k+ edits there, 14k+ global. i work (or intend to) on biology (mainly entomology, evolution mecanisms, LUCA…), particle physics and biographies linked to those fields - MIRROR (talk) 13:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Veneziano Italian Wikipedia. Editor since 2007, sysop since 2008, >20.000 edits focused in medical, psychological and scientific areas. I'm, and I will be, active in content verification issues in medical/psychological areas. Veneziano (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. GabrielF primarily en-Wiki. Editor since December 2004 with 8,000+ edits. In addition to article writing, I also help provide PDFs of scholarly and other articles at the resource exchange. GabrielF (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Cullen328 I have 16,000+ edits on English Wikipedia since 2009. I started working on biographies of California mountaineers and artists, and have gone on to write, expand and reference articles on a wide variety of topics. I am also an Online Ambassador assisting college students working on Wikipedia assignments. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Dank - around 50k edits, lots of reviewed content, frequent reviewer at WP:FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 19:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Miss Manzana: Spanish Wikipedia. Around 18 000 edits, administrator. More than 70 GAs and 11 FAs, regular GA and FA reviewer. User since 2010. мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (let's talk) 19:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. WhisperToMe - 8 years of experience on the English Wikipedia, with a large number of edits, active in article and content writing - I would find such access very useful WhisperToMe (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Andreateletrabajo. 2 years and admin in es:WP. More than 30 000 edits in several WM Projects. 1 GA, 70 articles and GA revewer. I write about biology, technology and others, and as admin I do extensive job of reversions, copyvio deletions, add contents, add sources, etc. My uni don't has access to HighBeam, so I think it can be very usefull for me. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Daniel B - 6 years of experience on the Hebrew Wikipedia. Around 40K edits. Administrator and CheckUser. Write about mathematics, 2 FA. Daniel B (talk) 20:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Diego Moya. About 8 years editing English Wikipedia, creating missing articles and referencing stuff mainly in Computer Science. I could use access to the Journal of End User Computing and related topics to improve the Human–computer interaction articles. Diego (talk) 20:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Oyoyoy. Approx. 3yrs editing on Hebrew & English Wikipedia and related projects. Hundreds of articles added to Hebrew Wikipedia. I would love to have access to this database. Oyoyoy (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. SPat talk 20:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC) ~3 years editing on en and mr wikipedia. Added ~20 new article.[reply]
  81. עדירל (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2012 (UTC) I am active on Hebrew Wikipedia, use free Hebrew newspapers very often and would like to supplement from other sources.[reply]
  82. ליאור • Lior (talk) - An active editor in Wikipedia since 2004, mostly contributing to the Hebrew Wikipedia. I focus on Beta Israeli heritage as well as scientific articles, both of which necessitate access to hardly-accessible articles and books. A HighBeam account might prove useful for these. Thanks, ליאור • Lior (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Kiefer.Wolfowitz: 25 thousand edits since 2005, mostly in mathematics, statistics, computer science, United States history (especially politics), English-language and Spanish-language literature, contemporary Sweden.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Mandarax. On English Wikipedia for 7 years, with over 200,000 edits. I include plentiful citations in the articles I write, and having this additional resource would be very useful. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Aircorn. Have been on the English Wikipedia for two years and have 11 000 edits. One of my main focuses is the GA process and having access to HighBeam will help me verify potentially "Good" articles. AIRcorn (talk) 23:28, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Aviados: A highly active editor in Hebrew Wikipedia for the past 4 years, with over 65K edits (most of which are in the main namespace). Administrator since 2009. Focus mainly in content writing, usually within the various fields of Jewish studies. Access to HighBeam would undoubtedly prove useful for my work. Aviados (talk) 23:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Simon Burchell: Been around since 2006, but not really active until 2008, with 29,000 edits. 4 FAs and a dozen or so GAs. I also sporadically spend time on the Spanish wikipedia. I'm constantly frustrated by paywalls, and any extra resource would be a great help. I'm particularly active in WikiProjects Mesoamerica and Guatemala with the addition of new material. I do a lot of article assessment on WikiProject Mythology, I also write up the odd British archaeological site. Simon Burchell (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Peteforsyth (talk · contribs) Active Wikipedia editor since 2006, primarily on topics relating to the U.S. state of Oregon. I do a good deal of new Wikipedia editor outreach and outreach to cultural institutions as well. Access to the Highbeam database would be tremendously useful -- I frequently run into Highbeam abstracts and am frustrated by the inability to access the full article. The donation is greatly appreciated!! -Pete (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Goodvac: English Wikipedia, active since late 2007, 10,000+ edits. Involved in content creation and at the resource exchange. Goodvac (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Brianboulton Active since September 2007, about 50,000 edits, 56 Featured Articles. Mainly music and opera, also literature, general biographies and polar exploration. Sometimes recent scholarly articles, newspaper reviews etc are hard to access, and this could be a considerable help. Brianboulton (talk) 00:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. Smallman12q (talk · contribs): English wikipedia, active since 2009, ~10,000 edits. Involved in article creation and expansion. Smallman12q (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Peter.C (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. I am a student and recently I have had no time to have to go bury through sources to go and find proper articles to help me develop emergency medicine articles. As a high school student I do not have access to many good sources for what I need. At the moment I have 5000+ edits. Peter.C • talk • contribs 01:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Cindamuse: Active on en.wp two+ years with over 20,000 edits. Involved in article creation, verification, referencing, and expansion. Access to HighBeam would be valuable in my work on Wikipedia. Thanks! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 01:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. User:GorillaWarfare: Active on the English Wikipedia for over two years with almost 20,000 edits. I do a lot of maintenance work, but I find paid databases to be extremely useful when I do content work. I don't have access to HighBeam through my uni, so it would be quite nice! I don't work in any specific area, but I have two GAs, and am working on making one a FA. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Laser brain: English Wikipedia, active since 2008, 9,000+ edits. Active in Featured Article review process, and in article creation and expansion. --Laser brain (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Grapple X—active since October 2010 (~17 months), over 8,000 edits in this time. Active in content generation and improvement (60 GA-class articles, 1 FA, 1 FL at time of application). Would make use of newspaper archives mainly for the review history of film and television topics, though use of such a tool would probably light a fire under my ass to research more "important" topics as well. GRAPPLE X 02:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Wizardman - October since 2006 on English wikipedia, 100,000+ edits, several featured and good articles, Highbeam would be able to help me write more of them. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Carrite (talk) 03:42, 18 March 2012 (UTC) - I'm a content writer with about 30K edits and over 160 significant starts and can use the resource.[reply]
  99. Imzadi1979. Active in the U.S. Roads WikiProject on the English Wikipedia in addition to its sister projects with 10 FAs and 133 GAs in my almost 54,00 edits since October 2005. My intent is to continue to research the histories of various US highways and I could assist the rest of the project obtain articles. Imzadi 1979 → 04:22, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Johnbod, 10 FAs, 189 DYks & 99k edits on en:wp since 2006. Most on art & art history, so I would mostly be interested in journals like The Art Bulletin, which I'm delighted to see HighBeam carry. Johnbod (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Noleander 2 FAs; 4 GAs; 21,000 edits; 5+ years; primarily a content creator. --Noleander (talk) 04:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Carcharoth. 7+ years experience, c.60,000 edits (with c.15,000 article edits). Content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article review processes) where access to Highbeam would be useful. Topics I have worked on and intend to work on in the future include the history of science, medicine and technology, and World War I. Carcharoth (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Orlady. American; editor in the English Wikipedia since 2004; active since 2006; currently administrator; well over 60,000 total edits. Most of my work is in creation and improvement of content in a diverse variety of topical areas, mostly related to current topics or the last couple of centuries -- roughly corresponding to the period covered by HighBeam archives. I don't have access to any university libraries and my access to paywall-protected Internet content is rather limited, but I am skilled at locating information on the free Internet. I have found archived articles from newspapers and magazines published in the last two centuries to be valuable resources for research, particularly in the subject areas of history, politics, biography, and business. Access to HighBeam resources would definitely increase the stature of the sources I use, as I would have less need to rely on articles from small-city local newspapers that happen to have been archived at Google Books. --Orlady (talk) 05:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Theleftorium - written 130+ GAs and 4 FAs, and made 30,000+ edits over the past 4 years. I'm an administrator but I mostly write articles. HighBeam would be very useful for me. Theleftorium (talk) 10:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Cwmhiraeth - I have been with the English Wikipedia since late 2010 and create articles on animals and plants. I often find myself frustrated by not being able to access articles from scientific journals. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Fæ - c.73,000 edits to the English Wikipedia over the last 2 years and 88,000+ globally with a further 21,000 by Faebot. I have been available as a direct contact on WP:REX for over a year (I would encourage more people to put their names there if they want to help with sourcing and verification) and regularly check things up for others using the British Library as I am the point of contact for the GLAM programme there (as well as other UK institutions). Oh, forgot to mention I'm an Admin on Wikipedia and an OTRS volunteer and sometimes checking sources is relevant for some issues that come in to Wikimedia by email. --Fæ (talk) 12:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. AshLin - I'm coordinator for WikiProject India. 22K edits, 4 GAS, 18 DYKs. I'm working on India-related articles on History, military history & biodiversity. My greatest need is quality refs in areas where Indo-Pak conflict issues arise. AshLin (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Moonriddengirl (talk) - Pushing five years on Wikipedia. 113,913 live and deleted edits combined. While I do create articles when I can (not often), I would primarily use the resource for copyright cleanup.
  109. Fang Aili talk - English Wikipedia since 2005, ~24K edits, I was one of the most active sysops for a time. I have done some content work, but these days I would mainly use the access to find sources for BLPs and other articles I ran into while doing cleanup. --Fang Aili talk 15:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Modernist – English Wikipedia since 2006, nearly 6 years, 72K+ edits, 9 FA, 3 GA, mostly content on the Visual arts and culture related articles. Modernist (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. FormerIP. 9,614 edits (plus one in just a second) and about 2,000 before that as an IP, over the last 4 years or so. I do regular content creation, particularly fixing unreferenced biographies (although there's less of that to do now) and preparing articles for WP:ITN, which can include adding a lot of background and fixing general problems as well as updating the news-y bit. On my to do list at the moment is improving some articles to do with linguistics and the Sex Pistols (as two separate topics, if you were wondering). FormerIP (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. User:Ceoil - En Wiki since 2006; 60k edits, 20 FAs and another 15 odd FAR saves. Mostly art history, but also lith and popular music. Spend a significant amount time each week tracking down sources, old books, journal articles etc. Ceoil (talk) 16:09, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Graham Colm– Coming up to 5 years with 14,967 edits and 4 FAs. I work mainly on virology articles and I'm a FAC delegate. Graham Colm (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Truthkeeper88 - En wikipedia with about 39,000 edits, 9 FAs and others in the works, mainly in the area of literature. I beg and borrow sources, and buy books, pay large library fines. Anything to help sources be more accessible would be welcome. Truthkeeper (talk) 16:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Yngvadottir Primarily en.wikipedia - created one page on de.wikipedia but the comments on my German were scathing so I have returned to just gnoming on other Wikipedias ... Editor since July 2, 2008, 8,000+ edits, by my own count I've created 100 pages and I also do a lot of page expansions (including attempting to save articles at AfD). I'm extremely eclectic, except that I am not qualified to do much that's scientific/technical. I don't have access to any online archives through my local library and have no academic library affiliation, so I could really use help seeing newspaper articles. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Factumquintus - Editor since 2004 and sysop since 2005 on German WP; mentor since 2009; ~24 500 edits de; ~32 000 edits global; topics: mostly biology -Factumquintus (talk) 18:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. User:Ermanon: Italian wikipedia, since 2006, editing (25000+) mostly in geography and administrative divisions. I'm active on edits verification and peer reviewing. --Ermanon (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. CheepnisAroma French wikipedia, with over 26,000 contributions. Very eclectic (history, geography, sciences, fixing links, disambiguation, spelling corrections). A HighBeam account would be more than useful for me. CheepnisAroma (talk) 19:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. User:Alpha Quadrant - Editor since 2010, 42,000 edits. I primarily work at Articles for Creation and I typically write articles on United States organizations related articles. Often times, articles in this area are behind paywalls. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. User:Cheveri - Editor at es.wiki, where I am also an administrator. I usually review GA, and have also written four of them from the begining.I spend an important part of my time here on countervandalism duties, in addition to some improvements for already existing articles. Registered since 2005 and about 15000 edits. Cheveri (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. User:Shakehandsman - Editor on English Wikipedia since 2006, 10,000+ edits, most of which involved content creation or trying to add refs to existing content. I work on BLPs, crime articles, sports, politics, quite a variety of subjects really and access to Highbeam would allow me to get more work done. I intend to continue editing my content generation and referencing work well into the future.--Shakehandsman (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. User:Bay Area Native - I've been editing for 5 years, focused on current news events, including articles relating to the San Francisco Bay Area as well as current LGBT issues and notable media figures. My watchlist is extensive, monitoring vandalism-vulnerable articles on sensitive topics. Access to HighBeam would greatly enhance my refinement on the articles in my watchlist. Bay Area Native (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. User:Yomangani - I meet the criteria; if the accounts are to be "given on a random basis to all who meet the basic qualifications" if over-subscribed, I don't see any need to provide a candidate statement. Yomanganitalk 23:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. User:Pequod76 - I've been editing for almost 5 years, mostly on the Wikipedia in Italian. I focused on and added referenced contents to linguistics, ancient history, music and literature related articles, with almost 50.000 edits on it.wiki (my record there). Access to HighBeam would be good for my referenced editing. --Pequod76 (talk-ita.esp.eng) 01:22, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. User:Milowent - Active on Wikipedia for 2.5 years, over 10,000 edits. Active on Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron, also work on sourcing BLPs and founded Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue. Plan on continuing same work, I do not have free or other access to Highbeam; I have cited highbeam before when people have helped me get a copy of an article for sourcing something.--Milowent • hasspoken 01:24, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. User:Andreasmperu - Active at es.wiki since 2008 (around 59.000 edits), also with more than 1.000 edits at enwiki. Andreasm just talk to me 02:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. User:Fixertool - Active at es.wiki since 2006 (around 13750 edits), mainly focused in literature and history. One good article.--Fixertool (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Symposiarch (talk) 10:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC) mainly German Wikipedia, but also French + English WP, active since 2005, ~21,831 edits de, Total edits (including deleted): 8,778 @ fr, 2,671 @ en; no good and no featured articles, topics (mainly) history, especially local/german history, biographies, German wine, local plants, project Metz, african elections and politicians[reply]
  129. User:Ealdgyth. Active with medieval history, equine. 60,000+ edits, a number of FAs and GAs. Continuing work on improving coverage of medieval topics as well as horse subjects.
  130. Antandrus (talk). Active in many fields (music history, energy, geography, geology, and a few others); have written over 630 articles from scratch; approximately 100,000 edits; eight years of history; admin for seven. I've bumped into HighBeam's paywall many times, particularly while writing articles on the petroleum industry.
  131. User:Patrickneil Seven years of editing, 15,000+ edits, with 3 FAs and more GAs, mostly history, international relations, and geography topics. With HighBeam, its mostly tracking down newspaper articles from 10+ years ago, that have otherwise disappeared from the web.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 17:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. User:Taty2007 - Active at es.wiki since 2008 with approximately 25.921 edits. I am an admim at es.wiki and have contributed in several good and feature articles, as well as creating articles related to art and history. I constantly search information in books and newspaper articles that require subscription such as Oxford databases and Access World News. As an active member of Wikipedia I will continue using these research tools and resources. Taty2007 (talk) 18:10, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Gary King – Content contributor. Haven't been as active lately as I used to be, but still working on a few articles off-wiki. Gary King (talk · scripts) 19:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. User:Ravpapa seven years or so, thousands of edits, mostly in the areas of classical music and the Middle East.--Ravpapa (talk) 19:36, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. User:Julius1990. User on de.wiki since 2005 with 33.000+ edits. So far 15 articles that are rated excellent or good articles. My topics are art history, sports, cinema, latin america, history. Julius1990 (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. User:JayJasper. Wikipedia editor for over 5 yrs., with more than 25,000 edits. Fields of interest and editing activity include current events, politics, US history, law, literature, sports, music, among others. Experience with creation, expansion, research and sourcing of content.--JayJasper (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. User:GuillaumeTell. Based in England. Active on English Wikipedia since December 2005, over 13,000 edits (it could be a lot more, but I'm always pressing the Show Preview button), member of WikiProject Opera and WikiProject Shakespeare. Also interested in a wide range of other subjects, especially architecture and local history. Some experience in Peer Reviews and FAC, c3000 articles on my Watchlist. --GuillaumeTell 22:51, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. User:SarahStierch Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow, active in WP:Feminism, Visual Arts, Women's History. I'm the Wikipedian in Residence at the Smithsonian Institution going on one year. Feel free to visit my userpage to review my resume and bio! I often run into HighBeam articles, especially about women artists, and I'd love to help improve coverage about those artists and other women with HighBeam. Sarah (talk) 23:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. User:Buckshot06 English, French wikipedias. I focus on military subjects that are not well covered by Wikipedia's systemic bias - thus Africa, Asia especially. I would very much like access to a HighBeam account to improve coverage and sourcing. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. Archeologo. User on Italian Wikipedia since 2006, 6+ years experience. I currently work mostly on archaeology and heritage pages, and accessing to Highbeam would be definitely useful. --Archeologo (talk) 02:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. User:Gadfium. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2004, admin since 2005, 90 thousand edits. Have created hundreds of articles, and frequently add references to other people's additions. I frequently find HighBeam a useful source of references, but am unable to read the full articles.-gadfium 03:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Moroboshi (talk · contribs · count). Editor on it.wikipedia for over 5 years, with over 15k edit on ns0. Im mainly active on game and game publisher articles, mainly with translation from en.wiki, but I like to expand the articles and to add source when they are missing.--Moroboshi (talk) 06:44, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. User:Tom Morris. Admin on en.wikipedia and en.wikinews. I've written a number of DYKs and helped fact-check articles and check up on references on mostly academic topics, primarily philosophy and a few other humanities topics. It'd be useful to have HighBeam access for a variety of sources related to medical history, current affairs, humanities and so on in order to help write new DYKs, and to improve existing articles on topics of interest. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. User:Graham87. I've an admin who has been editing Wikipedia for seven years. I primarily write content about music (both classical and popular) and, more recently, about the Australian Paralympic movement. Because I use a screen reader, I find it difficult to access Google Books and the Google News Archive, so having a free high-quality corpus of full texts would be especially useful to me. Graham87 12:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Qoan. Editor mainly on Spanish and Catalan wikipedia since 2006, I'm Patroller in ES-wiki. I've created hundreds of articles, mainly on Geography, History and Languages and I've contributed by increasing information and adding sources to thousands other articles on these fields. Access to high-quality reliable sources would be of inmeasurable value for me. Qoan (say it!) 13:56, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. User:Eclipsed - English Wikipedia. I contribute under a declared COI on various subjects. 6000+ edits, started in 2005. Intentions for improving articles. Eclipsed   (talk)   (COI Declaration)   13:59, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. User:Tchoř – active mainly on cs.wikipedia: 20 thousands edits since 2008. I believe I would use the access for verification, referencing and resolving content disputes.--Tchoř (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. User:Silver seren - English Wikipedia. I have a wide range of subjects I work on, 2 GAs, 42 DYKs, and 67 articles total, over 18,000 edits, and active since 2006. This will prove very useful in all of my source gathering for improving AfDs and writing articles in general. SilverserenC 16:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. User:John Broughton - English Wikipedia. I have more than 25,000 edits, active since August 2005. I'm the author of Wikipedia: The Missing Manual. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 17:27, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. User:We hope-Here 2+ years with 32,000+ edits. Editing a variety of topics, including bios and veterinary medicine. Was an avid user of Google News Archive for this until they abandoned the project and also cut the search capabilities of their database at the same time. We hope (talk) 17:33, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. User:Miyagawa - 3+ years, around 24,000 edits on the English language Wikipedia. 8 FLs, 39 GAs and 164 DYKs. Would be primarily looking to use the newspaper archives for content generation as I have access to some British newspaper archives through my library but it would be wonderful to have access to some of the American ones too. Miyagawa (talk) 18:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. User:ErrantX - ~2 years, 16,000 edits. My interests tend to be biographies, WW2 and current events, but I dabble all over. Archive access would provide a whole lot more source material for my article work :) --Errant (chat!) 19:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. User:Chrishmt0423 - English Wikipedia. 5+ years, 40,000+ edits. 51 FLs. I mainly edit NBA articles. Archive access would help to verify facts.—Chris!c/t 19:17, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Valfontis (talk) Admin on English Wikipedia. Over 6 years experience and over 60,000 edits. e-mail is enabled. I create content, and do expansion, verification, rescue and clean up. I don't have access to HighBeam through my local library. Access to HighBeam would help me in my work--the snippet views often tantalize with hints of a subject's notability, but usually can't be used as reliable sources without checking the full article. I believe strongly in providing full citations and will adhere to the usage suggestions. Thanks for the opportunity! Valfontis (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. 28bytes (talk): Admin on English Wikipedia; editing since 2006, 18,000 edits so far. I've created just under 100 articles so far, with plans for many more. 28bytes (talk) 19:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Mazbln (talk) - (Mainly) German Wikipedia, active since 2004, about 50,000 edits, admin. I would use the access for research in regard of the Balkan conflicts of the 90ies to verify articles and to solve edit wars. --Mazbln (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. User:Jrcla2. Over 5+ years as registered user, 91,000+ manual edits, 735 article creations, 97 DYK credits. I create new articles on historically and modern-day notable college basketball players. I frequently need archived articles to help beef up content but have trouble doing so, thus a HighBeam account would be tremendously helpful. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. User:The Rambling Man - Nearly 7 years here, 70,000+ edits, sysop, 'crat, featured list director, 50+ featured credits (FA + FL). This kind of freedom to access info would be invaluable on a daily basis. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. User:Dirtlawyer1. Over 41,000 manual edits to English Wikipedia in three years on Wikipedia. I work to improve college sports articles, including teams, athletes and coaches. Access to a HighBeam account would be extremely helpful for adding sourced footnotes for newspapers, magazines and other publications not availble through Google News Archive or not otherwise available online. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. User:Eagles247. English Wikipedia. Been an editor for almost three years with about 40,000 edits to mainly National Football League and college football-related articles. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:45, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. User:Lemonade51 English Wikipedia. Have made over 3k edits since 2005 as I contributed subtly for the first few years. Help out referencing football articles and from time to time television programmes. A Highbeam account would be highly beneficial in finding articles published by newspapers pre-1998 on the internet in order to beef up content and double check information. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. User:Colin. Over 6 years on English Wikipedia with 10k+ edits. I create, edit and review mainly medical articles. Also some people-lists for which newspaper sources are very useful. Colin°Talk 21:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  163. User:wtshymanski. English Wikipedia, and some photos and diagrams on Commons; about 29000 edits in article space since 2005. I have been adding references and expanding text in articles relating to electrical engineering and history of electrotechnology.--Wtshymanski (talk) 21:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. User:César German Wikipedia. Nearly 70000 edits there in almost seven years. Hundreds of articles – mainly about people in film and television history, several German DYK credits, six good articles (however all from 2005/06). --César (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. User:Little Mountain 5. Over four years and 19,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, with quite a bit of content creation and expansion, verification, and referencing. I mainly work on Oregon and river related articles. I also have a Credo account. Thanks! LittleMountain5 22:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Er Cicero: Italian Wikipedia. >14.000 global edits since September 2008, working mostly in Ancient Rome and occasionally in other fields. I got a credo account in 2011. Er Cicero (talk) 22:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. User:Cassianto - I have been an active editor on the English Wikipedia for two and a half years and have nearly 4,000 edits. I mainly edit biographies on those who were prominent within the English music hall and Edwardian theatre era, for which I have contributed on both GA's and FA's. -- Cassianto (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. User:JuneGloom07. I have been an editor on the English Wikipedia for five years, and have accumulated nearly 26,000 edits. I mainly edit articles on soap operas and fictional characters, though I do venture into film articles and BLPs. I have contributed to a number of DYK's, GA's and FL's. - JuneGloom Talk 23:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. User:Rikster2. Wikipedia editor since 2006. I work mostly on historical and current event articles about basketball and particularly college basketball. Very active editor for WP:College Basketball Rikster2 (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Ian Rose. Wikipedia editor since 2005; 29,000 edits; 30 Featured Articles; FAC Delegate and Military History Wikiproject Coordinator. As writer, work mainly in military biographies but edits and reviews range across arts, technology and general history. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Aushulz I have an account from 3 years and 7 months. I have 79107 contributions in Wikimedia projects, mainly it.wikipedia (62232), it.wiktionary (7318), commons (5697), en.wikipedia (2141) and it.wikibooks (1065). My fields of interest are science and technology, expecially chemistry, physics and engineering. I wrote new articles and I have modified old ones, adding contents, references, bibliography, and so on. I think can be very useful for my wikipedian activity have access to HighBeam search engine. --Aushulz (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. EncMstr has been editing enwiki for 6 year 7 months 5 days and 34,000+ edits. I frequently search for citations for existing content, as well as expanded content. Often I find content which is not supported and remove it if it seems like it cannot be found, or tag it if I think someone with other sources could find a citation. This looks like an amazing resource for such work, especially to help minimize our FUTON bias. —EncMstr (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Paulmcdonald Approximately 5 years editing experience, 25,000+ edits. I look for citations on college football articles and articles about the state of Kansas.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:43, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. User:Arxiloxos English Wikipedia, 3-1/2 years, 12,000 edits. I spend a lot of time looking for sources for both new and existing articles in a variety of areas, so full access to HighBeam would be very valuable. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:57, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. User:Omgosh30. English Wikipedia for 2 years. I have made extensive improvements to Italian football articles, but access to HighBeam would provide me with the means to add further value to my work.  Omg †  osh  11:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. User:Paul MacDermott. English Wikipedia. 4 years experience, 41000 edits, content related work (creation, expansion, referencing). Topics include current events, media and biographies for which HighBeam access would be extremely useful. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. User:Number 57. English Wikipedia, six years experience, c. 57,000 edits. My main area of work is election and referendum articles, and have now probably started around 2,000 articles on them. Having access to the Political Science journals on Highbeam would be a particularly useful source of information (Google searches for the relevant info relating to certain elections have often led me to Highbeam snippets, but without full access). Number 57 13:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. User:Waldir. Mainly active in English Wikipedia, but also in several other Wikimedia projects. Editor for over 7 years now, with 14,000 edits. Administrator. Heavily focused in content work (creation, expansion, referencing), in topics I come across due to my academic work or random interest. --Waldir talk 14:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  179. User:MSGrabia (de). German Wikipedia, 1,500+ edits (articles only) since 2005 in film and television. Articles, cleanup and helping others (including being an adopter in de.). I would use the access to research critical reception of movies. Find me at MSGrabia (de) (talk).
  180. User:Acdixon. English Wikipedia and Commons. Editor since September 2006, admin since February 2011. 17,000+ edits. Have contributed to numerous pieces of recognized content (FAs, GAs, DYKs, etc), mostly related to the state of Kentucky. Would like to have access to sources on more recent politicians, especially governors, in my quixotic pursuit of a Governors of Kentucky featured topic. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 14:19, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. User:Ktlynch Active since 2007 under a different account, this one since 2009, mostly English but also French. 10 GAs, in literature, film and general interest. Divide time between article writing and reviewing. Access to scholarly material would be very useful. --Ktlynch (talk) 14:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. de:Benutzerin:Liesbeth Lass for my account de:Benutzerin:Liesbeth (SUL was not possible any more). In de active since 2008, 11 000 edits. I was advised to aply after unsucessfully trying to verify de:William Pearson (Bariton) but found http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4727890.html. I often work on biografies, obituaries would be helpfull. --Liesbeth Lass (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  183. User:Cmadler Active since 2005, 11,500 edits on English Wikipedia (plus a few thousand more on other projects, particularly Commons and English Wikisource). This access would be mostly useful for work on sports history articles (particularly college football and college basketball) as well as articles related to Michigan and Kentucky. cmadler (talk) 15:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. User:JoJan English, Dutch, French, German Wikipedia + Commons . 8 years experience , a total of more than 86,000 edits, content-related work, especially relating to Gastropoda (content creation, expansion, verification, referencing) access to Highbeam will be very useful to read more than the abstracts and look beyond the paywall of scientific journals. JoJan (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. User:Invertzoo, Active since 2007, primarily on the English Wikipdia, over 63,000 edits, 6 GAs,content-related work, especially relating to the Gastropoda and also more recently the Bivalvia. My work includes content creation, expansion, verification, and referencing. Access to Highbeam would be extremely useful, allowing me to read more than just the abstracts of papers, and to see beyond the paywall of scientific journals. Invertzoo (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. User:Shellnut, I am a former marine biologist and a new editor active since October 2011, on the English Wikipdia, over 2,800 edits in just 5 months, primarily related to the taxonomy of Gastropoda and the Bivalvia. My work includes content creation, expansion, verification, and referencing. Access to Highbeam would be extremely useful, allowing me to read more than just the abstracts of papers, and to see beyond the paywall of scientific journals which I no longer have access to in my career. Shellnut (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. User:Toohool, editor since 2006, ~2k edits. Active in developing articles on casinos and the gaming industry. Toohool (talk) 22:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. User:Trident13, based Wales, UK, 78,000+ edits, active 5years 11months. Active within WikiProject Wales, Motorcycles and Railways, and I am also active in writing numerous Biographies across numerous sectors, including business, actors, news readers and sports (in excess of 250). I am particularly interested in how access to HighBeam could improve the quality of biographocal articles. With media paywalls now becoming more prevelant, and often many key points of verification of fact and background reliant on old newspapers and magazine articles, and yet with many publications continually reducing the time of storage of old articles, I believe that this trial could be invaluable in improving biographical article quality. Rgds, - Trident13 (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  189. User:Edison Over 41,000 live edits over past 7 years on English Wikipedia. Admin since September 2007. Email is authenticated. A High Beam account would be useful when I am finding references to improve articles up for deletion, in answering questions at the Reference Desk, and in creating new articles based on threads at the Reference Desk, as well as in my new article patrol activities, where I often add the needed references. I've created 26 articles (including 3 "Did You Know" articles), in addition to redirects and disambiguation pages. Edison (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. User:DeFaultRyan. Active contributor to highway and college sports articles. I've done a lot of digging to come up with historical information about highways, but frequently run into dead-ends that might be unresolvable without a lengthy trip to a transportation office. Access to a research account such as Highbeam's could greatly streamline the process of verifying historical transport information when free sources don't exist. DeFaultRyan 02:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. User:VonTasha. French wikipedia. + 55K edits on fr.wiki; + 60K edits globally, in more than 6 years. Active in Botanic/Zoology project. I'd like to be able to read scientific publications beyond the abstract. VonTasha (talk) 04:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. User:Sylenius. French Wikipedia, 17k edits since 2006. Contributor in computer science (computer vision, image processing) and classical music/jazz and main contributor of several featured articles. I lost access to paid scientific publications/journals since out of academia and unikely to get another access anytime soon. Sylenius (talk) 08:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. User:Viriditas. User on English Wikipedia. Seven years, +107K edits with 44% in article space. Actively involved in verification and content creation. The only reason I'm requesting this is because I've tried to read and cite dozens of HighBeam articles within the last year, but I didn't have access. Viriditas (talk) 08:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  194. User:Cplakidas. Active on English Wikipedia, secondarily Greek and German ones, since 2005. Over 65,000 edits, of which 70% in article space, 3 FAs, over 50 GAs. Active in Byzantine, modern Greek, Ottoman, Arab and Persian history. Especially eager for journal access.Constantine ✍ 09:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. User:MathsPoetry. French Wikipedia, 15k edits since 2009. To be honest, most of them are orthographe corrections. Contributor in computer science, maths, and a bit of everything. Occasional edits on English, German, and Italian Wikipedia. MathsPoetry (talk) 10:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. User:Mike Coppolano French Wikipedia. Contributor in American literature. Mike Coppolano (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. User:Deuxtroy on French-language- Wikipedia; since 2006, via IP or user nickname, 3,000 edits under registered account, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article referencing and rescue) mainly (but non only) in economical fields. Could be useful when french references are not avalaible.
  198. User:Alexander Doria. French Wikipedia user with 9k edits since 2006. My contributions ranges mostly on classical music, greek philosophy (several featured articles), and politics. I refer frequently to online scientific articles, which I try to present in several projects (like this one). Alexander Doria (talk) 11:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Cherubino (talk) user since 2004 and administrator since 2009 in de:WP, mainly interessted in history, 20.000 edits. --
  200. User:Ling.Nut3 see User:Ling.Nut & User:Ling.Nut2. User over five years, five FA articles, (Total edits including deleted: 36,045), recently returned to working on endangered languages but pop in from time to time to help out at WP:FAC etc. Ling.Nut3 (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. ClemRutterUser over eight years, nudging 12K edits on English WP, and 16K on Commons. Working on content on eighteenth century industry and cleaning up articles that lack references or logic!
  202. Agamitsudo, +30k edits on wp.fr since end of 2010. Interested in a HighBeam account to reference articles on wp.en. --Agamitsudo (talk) 13:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. DeejayK, English Wikipedia, over 10k edits since 2006. Active primarily with NFL Project — DeeJayK (talk) 14:28, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Tom Reedy. Shakespeare and Early Modern lit and history, 4 1/2 years, 8,500+ edits. 47% content, 32% article talk, 10% WP/WP talk. Knowledgeable on WP policy, no blocks or topic bans. Every now and then I chime in on WP dispute board discussions or lend a disinterested hand to a contentious page. Tom Reedy (talk) 15:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. User:Parrot of Doom. Count me in. I've written or made a significant contribution toward 27 featured articles and 26 good articles, mostly on historical subjects. I can always use more source material. Parrot of Doom 18:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. User:Spinningspark. Strong content provider with a string of FAs and GAs to my name. Technology article bias often needs non-free content. Also intermittent sessions of article reviewing requires access for verification. SpinningSpark 20:34, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  207. User:MistyMorn. Eligible and would be grateful for the opportunity to access sources for content editing in fields such as classical music, literature, health research, etc. (no longer have free Highbeam access from work). —MistyMorn (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  208. User:Spanglej Around 12k edits (80% on article content) over three years on English Wikipedia, mostly on articles concerning contemporary poets, referencing uncited articles, developing biographical and critical sections. Span (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Salsero35 French Wikipedia. Contributor in science. Salsero35 (talk) 23:48, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  210. User:Jklamo 5k edits on enwiki, 5k on cswiki. HighBeam access may be very useful mainly for my work on renewable energy and economy topics. --Jklamo (talk) 00:41, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  211. User:Orygun. English Wikipedia editor since Nov 07. Write article on wide range of history topics including places, events, and biographies; Oregon geography entries; and military-related subjects. Have contributed ~5K edits including 135 substantial articles.--Orygun (talk) 02:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  212. User:Bridies. I do content creation in -especially older- video game articles, where perhaps the only sources are old print magazines. I've used a HighBeam free trial in creating FAs and GAs and so would love full access. I've several years experience and several thousand edits. bridies (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  213. User:AroundTheGlobe - 9k+ edits on en.wiki (since 2006), 300+ images uploaded to Commons. 1 GA, 2 FL and 20 DYK contributions - I am hoping to contribute more FA/GA articles on Hinduism/Cricket/Aviation if I get more references. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 05:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  214. User:DoriSmith. Wikipedian since 2005 with nearly 12K edits. I've wished I had this access numerous times as I've added references to articles, and I know it would really come in handy. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 05:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  215. User:Ruigeroeland. Wikipedian since April 2006 with 118,965 edits on English wikipedia and 1000s of uploads on commons. I am mainly working on creating and improving Lepidoptera articles. I would like an account to be able to access the biology related journals they have available. Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:31, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Lenka64. Czech Wikipedia, active since 2005, about 10,000 edits. Access could be useful for biografical references and cs-wikiquote.--Lenka64 (talk) 11:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Canadian Paul 50k+ edits on the English Wikipedia across a wide variety of topics. Lost access to these kinds of resources after my master's and would love to have it again to help improve articles to GA status and beyond. Canadian Paul 15:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  218. Beyond My Ken here since 2005, close to 100k edits in total (see here), about 100 articles created, lots of gnomish work including improving refs Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Alan Liefting. Been on English Wikipedia for eight years. Over 94,000 edits. I create and update environment and New Zealand related articles. See [2] for list of new articles (sort of). Am often frustrated with a lack of access to Highbeam pages. Main city library closed due to earthquake damage. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  220. User:Bigturtle. c389 articles started, and 10,290 edits credited, since December 2005. Likes looking at other people's citations to see if they work or not, and coming up with better ones if possible (sometimes). Specializes: As little as possible, but look for articles about the geography of northern Michigan and the history of Antarctica. Bigturtle (talk) 05:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  221. User:Bagumba. English Wikipedia. I have edited since 2008 with over 9,000 edits and 39 pages created. I am active in WikiProject National Basketball Association and WikiProject Baseball, and HighBeam access would aid in gathering sources beyond free online content for expansion and verification of existing articles and for creation of new articles. It's frustrating sometimes seeing relevant search results on Google but not having access to the paid content, especially older newspaper articles.—Bagumba (talk) 06:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  222. User:Melirius. Russian Wikipedia. 7000+ edits since 2005. The project about FRINGE theories in Russian Wikipedia permanently needs reliable sources. --Melirius (talk) 13:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  223. User:Shirt58. Works in en.wp.org mainly in the areas of literature, Australian history, invertebrate zoology, fine arts, classical and popular music, the various codes of football, biographies, cricket, law, and... pretty much everything else. 20 000 or so edits, 200 or so articles started, and references added to tidy many other articles. A lot of things I work on are behind pay-walls that would otherwise be accessible via HighBeam.--Shirt58 (talk) 14:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  224. User:Fetchcomms, enwp, six GAs, 29 DYKs, to-do list. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 17:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Im interested in getting an highbeam account so i can continue my research into Tropical cyclones here on the EN WP.Jason Rees (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  226. User:Demiurge1000. English Wikiepdia editor since June 2010, with over 11,000 edits. I regularly need access to paywalled (or similar) articles to expand or verify items in historical or BLP topics. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  227. User:Teemeah. Hungarian Wikipedia and English Wikipedia. registered 7 years ago, have over 70 000 edits and 24 featured articles in huwiki, active patroller there, which envolves finding sources for unsourced/poorly sourced articles. Currently taking part in huwiki cleanup project that also involves research of good sources for unsourced articles. 小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 21:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  228. User:Crazypaco. primarily English WIkipedia. 18,000+ edits and over 100 created articles since November 2006. Active in Wikiprojects for National Register of Historic Places, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Universities, College Football, College Basketball, and the University of Pittsburgh. I engage in content-related work (creation, expansion, verification, article rescue) and citation additions to articles where access to Highbeam would be useful. CrazyPaco (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  229. User:Gede. I'm mainly active on French Wikipedia (where I'm a sysop), with more than 20 000 edits. I write articles in social sciences, where I often use academic references that are covered by Highbeam. --Gede (talk) 09:18, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  230. User:Cunard. English Wikipedia. Three Wikipedia:Good articles and 37 Wikipedia:Did you know articles. I have frequently come across subscription-needed Highbeam articles that could have aided me in my research. Cunard (talk) 10:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  231. User:RotT, about 12k+ edits, 2.5 years of editing, about 150 articles including 1 FA. User:RotT 11:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
  232. User:Patriarca12. Over 6,800 manual edits to English Wikipedia articles in five+ years on Wikipedia. Have worked to get numerous articles to both GA and FL in addition to 50+ DYKs. Access to a HighBeam account would be extremely helpful to help in the search for reliable sources not available through Google News Archive or other free internet sources. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  233. FT2. Editor since 2004, 13,000+ manual edits, over 120 authored articles including 4 or 5 GAs and some DYKs, hundreds of articles significantly edited. Constantly involved in the kinds of article work that requires access to media sources - old biographies and historical matters, checking articles are comprehensive, and verifying and determining what facts are supported by sources. Researching these often end up at old newspaper archive pages, often only visible on Highbeam or other restricted viewing, so access would be extremely beneficial. Examples: 1940s dancer Rose Marie Magrill, Diana's butler Paul Burrell, 1940s history of the synchrotron, the murder of Stephen Lawrence and the history of English murder law, the development of DDR4 SDRAM memory, the background and service history of BP's Deepwater Horizon, significant legal cases such as Berghuis v. Thompkins and Hepting vs. AT&T (more). Access would help and will be well used, suggested guidelines will be followed if granted :) FT2 (Talk | email) 02:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Racso. Spanish Wikipedia. Sysop, bureaucrat. Bot operator. OTRS volunteer. About 14k edits. About 123 articles created. About 10 good articles redacted. Would use HighBeam access as an extra help when researching for developing articles (I think it could even encourage me to write about new topics). --Racso (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  235. User:Rich Farmbrough en: Wikipeida mainly. Admin and botmeister. >>10k edits Highbeam would be a useful resource for referencing. Rich Farmbrough, 06:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  236. User:Jezhotwells. en: Wikipedia; some contributions to es: Wikipedia; over 55,000 edits; 3.5 years editing; Bristol, Theatre; Rivers; Spain. Regular GA reviewer (just under 600 reviews), contributor to FAC, 19 GAs, 2 FAs; original content creator for Bristol, Spain; Rivers, theatre and other associated subjects. Have library access to LexisNexis but Highbeam covers different newspapers and journals. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  237. User:Arnodino. French Wikipedia ([3]). First contributor on dinosaur project. Contributions since 2007. In search for scientific publications. Arnodino (talk) 18:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  238. User:Mwarf. French Wikipedia ([4]). Contributing since 2006. I'm interested in many topics (politics, history, music, computer science…). While searching for reliable sources to improve articles in these domains using search engines, I have come across HighBeam several times. An account would be very helpful to me in such cases. Mwarf (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  239. User:Delfort. +40.000 edits on it.wikipedia since 2006. HighBeam Research would very be useful to my work on verification and referencing biographies of sports people, historical sports events and history of sports. --Delfort (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  240. User:France3470. English Wikipedia. Editor since 2007; highly active since 2010. Have made 10,00+ edits primarily to mainspace; contributed 1 GA, and 5 DYKs as well as created 40+ others. I frequently expand and add citations to articles and can see HighBeam being very useful for this.France3470 (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  241. User:Meowy. English Wikipedia, for 6 years (since April 2006) and with over 7300 edits: 40% being content generation and 40% being content discussion. The majority of these were on articles related to the Near East and Caucasus regions. I would be especially interested in using HighBeam to access specialist journal content related to the art, architecture and history of the Near East / Middle East / Caucasus, in particular the medieval period. This would be used for both content writing and verification. Meowy 20:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  242. User:Wikisilki. Spanish Wikipedia. Around 30 000 edits since July 2008. I use to create or expand articles or biographies on art, literature and history issues, do sometimes reviews of GA and FA. I also have a Credo account. Thanks! wikisilki 01:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  243. User:Kafka Liz. Registered user since 2007; over 8,000 edits in that time, with a focus on visual arts and history. 4 FAs to date, and could really use better access to sources. Kafka Liz (talk) 01:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Christian Stroppel German Wikipedia. Registerd since Jul 2007; 1,261 edits; 44.01% being content generation an 13.80% being content discussion. I studied psychology and want to read original studies.--Christian Stroppel (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Ecemaml Spanish Wikipedia and Commons. Admin in both project. Almost 90,000 edits in the Spanish Wikipedia and significant contributions to, at least, five featured articles. --Ecemaml (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  246. User:Josh Parris. Active on en, increasingly active on simple. 70 en articles created, and I'm finding myself doing a lot of citation work recently. Planning on doing a lot more citations in BLPs I've created or become entangled with. Josh Parris 11:10, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  247. User:Coemgenus, active on English Wikipedia with about 26,000 edits in 7 years, including 10 FAs and 2 FLs. I mostly work in history and biography. --Coemgenus (talk) 11:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  248. User:Livitup Over 5k edits since 2005. I enjoy expanding stubs and wiki-gnoming, including {{refimprov}}ing, when possible. Very active with CSD, PROD, and AfD, where having access to high-quality sources would be a real benefit in getting things right. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 05:19, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  249. User:AndyTheGrump Eclectic editor on e.Wikipedia. 12,000+ edits, active since August 2010. I've often found myself wishing for a facility like this, and expect to make good use of it verifying sources, improving articles, and (when I finally think of a subject that hasn't already been written about) maybe even writing new ones. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  250. User:Neatnik. 1,000+ edits on frwiki, 80% in the article namespace. Active since 2011. Mostly focused on music (artists biographies, record labels, etc). I'm creating/expanding and/or adding refs to those articles. I intend to continue and think an account would help. Presently I can't access Randy Newman's Playboy interview from 1987, for instance ([5]), or this article on Kranky Records ([6]), etc. Neatnik (talk) 08:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  251. User:Graeme Bartlett. Active since 2005 on en Wikipedia with over 40,000 edits. Created several hundred articles, and also frequently rescue from CSD by adding references. I will continue to write new content and rescue inadequately referenced material. HighBeam will greatly improve non-recent references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  252. User:Antemister usually active in the German WP (about 9000 contribs), contributing to contemporary history and politics, expecially in the afro.asian region, a topic where access to such news media is really helpful--Antemister (talk) 07:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  253. User:Epipelagic English Wikipedia with 44,000 edits over 6 years, 64 DYKs, contributing mainly to marine life --Epipelagic (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  254. user:Viswaprabha Most @ Malayalam & Sanskrit Wikipedia and Wiktionary Since 2005. ViswaPrabha വിശ്വപ്രഭ (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Dry Martini, 4500+ edits on it.wikipedia (active since April 2009), active in RC patrolling and welcoming new users. I would use the account to check information during patrolling, to get references for new articles (I also do that, yes ;-) ) and to retrieve references for the Reference recovery project on it.wiki. --Dry Martini (talk) 16:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  256. User:Cloudz679. English Wikipedia, 25,000+ edits over a period of more than five years. Lots of recent work on dead link cleanup. Main areas of contribution to articles with connections to association football and the Czech Republic. Although I do more fact-checking than content creation, I have created some DYK articles as well. Led a cleanup drive for FA-class articles at WikiProject Football recently, would love this opportunity to be able to do some more. Cloudz679 20:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  257. User:Literaturegeek. I have more than 23,000 edits to wikipedia; I mostly contribute to pharmacology and medical articles. I have worked and successfully brought 3 articles to Good Article status on wikipedia. My biggest hindrance to editing wikipedia is gaining access to full text papers/articles and I often am restricted to utilising abstracts. I was very excited to hear about this offer from HighBeam and I would be grateful to be given access to HighBeam for free.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 21:15, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  258. WhatamIdoing (talk · contribs) >59,000 edits so far, and it seems that I've created 45 articles. My interests are mostly medicine-related, but I'm also interested in several odd articles like Rudeness and Cupcake, and I also participate at several noticeboards, including WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  259. Zagalejo (talk · contribs) I've been here since 2005, and have made over 58,000 edits. I have hundreds of BLPs on my watchlist, so this will be helpful for fact-checking/maintenance. Zagalejo^^^ 02:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  260. Hildanknight (talk · contribs) I have written 9 GAs on Singapore-related topics and with HighBeam, would be able to write many more, to help counter systemic bias! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  261. GRuban (talk · contribs) - 7 years on EN, created dozens of articles, active on reliable sources noticeboard. --GRuban (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  262. Michig (talk · contribs) Administrator. Over seven years of editing, with more than 35,000 edits. More than 500 articles created, many more rescued and improved. Added sources to over 700 unsourced BLPs in the improvement drive (dealt with around 1,000 in total, each one requiring an evaluation of available coverage). Track record in searching for sources and using them effectively to improve the encyclopedia. Active at AfD where the ability to see the articles behind the Highbeam paywall would be a tremendous help. --Michig (talk) 20:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  263. Beeblebrox (talk · contribs) 57,000 edits, been doing too much admin work, looking to get back into improving content related to my adopted home state of Alaska and other areas I have an interest in. Wife doesn't want me spending any money on WP so this is the only way I'm getting behind the paywall. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  264. Collect (talk · contribs) Over 22,000 edits, with especial concern about claims made in biographies where sources are used which are not readily verifiable. Collect (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  265. Ponyo (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia admin with over 5 years experience and 38,000 edits. I mainly working on BLP articles and attempt to add better sourcing to biography articles. Access to the HighBeam database would be extremely useful with regard to my editing activities. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  266. Eleassar (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia administrator, highly active in the Slovene Wikipedia and a participant of Deletion review debates in the Commons. More than 40,000 edits and over 7 years of editing in the English Wikipedia. Adding and verifying sources all the time, active in different areas, particularly medicine, Slovenia and biographies. The database would really simplify and help my work, because now I'm often dependent on excerpts and abstracts. --Eleassar my talk 21:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  267. Stuart.Jamieson (talk · contribs) Editor for 5 years, 3,000 edits primarily article expansion, subject researching and page creation. highbeam access would help with those cases where sources for expansion arent immediately available.. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  268. Danhash (talk · contribs) – I have edited a wide variety of articles (~5000 edits) and intend to continue contributing, specifically in subjects such as software, multimedia technology, electronics, and psychological conditions. —danhash (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  269. Pyrrhus16 (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. Over 3 years experience, 17,000+ edits, content-related work (creation, expansion, verification) on music and entertainment articles, where access to Highbeam would be useful. Pyrrhus16 21:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  270. Axl (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. I have been editing for several years. I specialize in WikiProject Medicine. Axl ¤ [Talk] 21:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  271. Muboshgu (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. Editing for at least six years, over 70,000 edits to date. I work on baseball, US history and politics mostly. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  272. MBisanz (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. 100,000+ edits over 5+ years. I do architecture and education. I could use HighBeam access, but don't absolutely need it, so feel free to give others priority. MBisanz talk 21:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  273. User:Fredddie English Wikipedia. 7 years of experience, over 16,000 edits. I edit primarily highway articles, but I also dabble in Iowa-related articles. –Fredddie™ 22:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  274. User:Noetica Active on English Wikipedia since 2005. Edits around 10,000 (I go for quality, not quantity); main interests are in development of style guidelines and associated policy; content interests include classical music, philosophy, neuroscience, and linguistics. NoeticaTea? 22:41, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  275. Joe Decker (talk · contribs) 7 years, 24,000+ edits/sysop on ENWIKI. Primary content work is adding sources to unreferenced BLPs, have often had to glimpse what I can via Google snippets of highbeam research to do that work, this would be a real help. Not available to me through local sources. I do a fair bit (as editor and sysop both) at AfD, and there'd be cases where I could put this tool to good use there as well. --joe deckertalk to me 23:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  276. User:Yaksar. English Wikipedia since 2007, some work on Wikimedia commons. My main focus is on government articles, but I frequently work on food topics and other subjects. I've created articles like Hugo Rogers and James R. Whelan. Highbeam would help with many political articles, in addition to helping with sourcing for articles at AfD.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  277. User:SkyMachine English Wikipedia. Had account ~3 years, active largely for the last year, 3100+ edits. Interested in science topics, origins, popular science publications, and literature. Having full text access to journal articles through Highbeam will be very helpful to my editing. SkyMachine (++) 00:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  278. User:BabelStone English Wikipedia, 3 years, 4,000 edits, 39 DYKs. BabelStone (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  279. CennoxX German Wikipedia since 2010, some 8.000 edits, editing mainly articles about movies and television.--CennoxX (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  280. Ezhuttukari Malayalam Wikipedia. Over 7000 edits In various subjects, mainly content generation. Sysop In Malayalam Wikipedia. These days, Physics and Electronics are mainly focused. --Ezhuttukari (talk) 01:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  281. Rajesh K Odayanchal : Malayalam Wikipedia. I have been editing in Malayalam Wikipedia for past 4 years, I engage in content-related work like creation, expansion, verification, article rescue etc and now mainly focused on the designing work for Wikimedia projects... I think that HighBeam access would help me a lot. Rajesh K Odayanchal (talk) 02:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  282. Kannan shanmugam : Malayalam Wikipedia. I have been editing in Malayalam Wikipedia for past 3 years, over 3000 edits and 1000 photographs. I think that HighBeam access would help me a lot.--Fotokannan (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  283. TheCatalyst31 English Wikipedia administrator, active since 2007, over 31,000 edits. I mostly work on geography (especially communities), highways, and historic places; I also try to find sources for AfD and unsourced articles. Most of my editing would be aided by access to local news articles, though since I have access to a different database right now, feel free to pass over me if there are too many applicants. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  284. 25or6to4 English Wikipedia. Main editing done on highways and historic places. Would use access to fill in gaps in the histories of highways and locations. 25or6to4 (talk) 04:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  285. User:Bruce1ee. Over 7 years on the English Wikipedia with over 40,000 edits; active on the DYK Project; 71 DYK creation/expansion credits, 8 GA promotion credits, many other content creations and expansions. I do not have access to HighBeam, and would use it to find reliable sources for music and literature related articles. —Bruce1eetalk 05:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  286. Aalfons German Wikipedia since 2007, 12k edits, some 50 new articles, 2 FAs, mostly working on biographies, verifications and help pages. Aalfons (talk) 05:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  287. User:Huntster. English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Been here since 2004 with 27,000 edits. I anticipate using an account for research in astronomy topics. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  288. Dwaipayan. Nearly 7 years in English wikipedia with over 19,000 edits. Have been involved in 5 successful featured article candidacies, several good article nominees and reviews. Many other content creation including multiple new articles, mostly related to India. The HighBeam account will be instrumental in finding and citing reliable sources.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  289. Rameshng. Actively involved in Wikipedia since 2008. Working mainly in the ml wikipedia, editing, creating articles related Indian Cinema, Culture, Transportation, Food. Over 15000 edits in home wiki and over 25K edits globally. Active in commons with more than 4000 media uploads. Heard about high beam and looks like I can get real good reference for making the articles richer. --Rameshng (talk) 06:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  290. Fram. Over 100,000 edits, created over 1,000 articles, mainly biographies of artists, early printers, and the like. Access to more and better reliable sources would be a huge bonus. Fram (talk) 06:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  291. Kropotkine_113 Active on fr.wikipedia.org for 6 years. 40.000+ edits, 300+ created articles. I work on artists biographies. I used to work on 18th-19th centuries scientists biographies but I stopped due to lack of reliable sources. Kropotkine 113 (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  292. AFBorchert Active on de.wikipedia.org for nearly 7 years, 22.000+ edits in all projects, c. 100 created articles including four with GA status at de-wp, mainly in the area of Irish history. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  293. Olaf Kosinsky German Wikipedia since 2009, 5k edits, also WikiCommons, mostly working on politics and history. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 08:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  294. Tschaensky German Wikipedia since 2005. More than 15.000 edits and over 1.000 articles created, mainly on winter sports. Over 1.300 photos for Commons. --Tschaensky (talk) 09:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  295. Symac french wikipedian since 2004, 20.000+ edits. Symac (talk) 09:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  296. Thomas7 German Wikipedia since 2004, works on Iran, Berlin, computer science, cryptography, meta. >25.000+ edits. ThomasPia (talk) 10:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  297. Kernel Saunters English Wikipedia and Commons. Have > 74,000 edits. Access would be extremely useful as it provides access to media sources that are hard to access by other means. Will prove invaluable in my editing of recent British history including obits Kernel Saunters (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  298. --Itu (talk) 10:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC) [7] Sources are essential[reply]
  299. User:Steven Zhang. 25k plus edits, mainly on en-wiki. Having access to this would help me expand articles I work on that lack referenced material available on the web, or content that has fallen offline (such as archived newspapers). Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  300. User: Netha Hussain : English Wikipedia, Malayalam Wikipedia and Commons Have 2000+ edits in all projects. Interested in editing articles related to medicine, surgery, pathology and pharmacology. --Netha Hussain (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  301. User:bwmoll3 English Wikipedia. 97000+ edits since Jan. 2006. History of the United States Air Force Bwmoll3 (talk) 11:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  302. User:Indif French WP. 14600+ edits since 2004. Interested in the history of the Maghreb. --Indif (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  303. User:Willking1979 English Wikipedian since 2008, 36,000+ live edits. Administrator, OTRS volunteer. Interested in Kentucky-related articles. Willking1979 (talk) 14:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  304. User:Dougweller English Wikipedia since April 2006, 77,000 edits, Administrator, OTRS volunteer, mainly working with articles to do with archaeology and history. I've trialled HighBeam and it's great, but the cost is too much for me to justify. Dougweller (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  305. Leaky Caldron English WP since 2006. 8300 edits. Interested in UK politics and local history where access to historical newspaper sources would be beneficial. Leaky Caldron 14:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  306. User:Carolmooredc English Wikipedia since 2006, 18,500+ edits. Political, law, civil liberties, foreign policy issues; GLAM work; Gender gap work; variety of biographies of living people. Also ongoing Outreach/Training (including WP:Workshop and WP:Workshop for Women) to improve education of users. Have used and appreciate Highbeam but cannot afford. CarolMooreDC 14:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  307. User:The-Pope. English wikipedia. >40,000 edits, lots of work on unreferenced biographies of living people and other biographies. Intend to continue to keep CAT:BLP low. The-Pope (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  308. User:Malik Shabazz. English Wikipedia. 60,000 edits since 2006. I write on a variety of subjects related to African Americans, Jews, and Israel-Palestine. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  309. User:Ronz. English Wikipedia. 64,000 edits since 2006. I edit a wide range of articles, focusing on changing promotional material into more encyclopedic content. --Ronz (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  310. User:Nihonjoe. English Wikipedia, around 100,000 edits, created over 600 articles, mostly Japan-related. I'd use the access to continue improving those articles as well as any others I came across. I should note that Japan-related articles are not the only ones I work on, just a primary focus. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  311. User:Nableezy. English Wikipedia, around 24K edits, created several articles. Interested in international relations and Islamic architecture. nableezy - 16:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  312. User:Morbidthoughts. Mostly to shore up RS for biographies with notability concerns. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  313. User:Anthonyhcole English Wikipedia, 14K edits since 2006, created a few medical articles and patrol recent changes to medical articles. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  314. user:Raul654, english Wikipedia, around 60k edits last time I checked. I run the featured article process. I'm active in identifying and creating missing encyclopedia articles. (Wikipedia:ACF Regionals answers, Wikipedia:Stanford Archive answers,, etc) Raul654 (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  315. User:PKM English Wikipedia and Commons, 19K edits in WP and 8K in Commons since 2005, active on 16th-19th century people & artists, Pre-Raphaelites/Arts & Crafts Movement, textile arts, fashion. I frequently run into HighBeam articles that would be great sources for work I am doing. PKM (talk) 17:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  316. User:Youreallycan - I think the project would benefit if I had one of these accounts. At times I have worked a fair bit with adding and formating citations to uncited content, and an account would also allow me to access and investigate otherwise unaccessible externals used to support disputed content. - Youreallycan 18:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  317. User:Paelius — Polish Wikipedia, ca. 6K edits since 2005, created and verified Middle Ages' articles. Continue improving texts about medieval pagan and christian world. — User:Paelius 18:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  318. User:Redtigerxyz +30k edits, FA, GA and DYK creation (Hinduism and India), 5 + years--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  319. User:Volunteer Marek 31,445 edits and 257 articles created. (posted by Malik Shabazz per request)
  320. User:Writegeist, English Wikipedia 4 years, 3,000 edits. Interests: politics, war, automotive, journalistic/literary, historical, etc. Intend continuing in these and other areas. HB archive will be useful for expansion, verification etc. partic. in BLP-related work. Writegeist (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  321. User:Sctechlaw, been here several years, some years before that as an IP editor. Have 1500+ edits. I write mostly about law, technology, and art, with a smattering of everything else. I especially focus on sourcing content with citations. My stats Sctechlaw (talk) 19:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  322. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing). Editing since 2003, over 80K en-Wikipedia edits; occasional interwiki edits and collaborations.. Wikimedia-UK volunteer. GLAM ambassador, Wikiproject Microformats founder. MonmouthpediA contributor. Regularly add/ improve references using Reflinks, Zotero and other tools. Editing a wide-range of topics, including biographies of ornithologists and other naturalists and artists; artworks; local history. Project requirements noted and I'm happy to comply. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  323. User:OrenBochman. 2000+ edits on en.wikitionary now active on en.wikipedia meta and books. I am active in art, linguistics, open source. HB will be useful for sourcing. BO; talk 23:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  324. User:Figureskatingfan Over 16,000 edits on en.wikipedia since Feb. 2007. I am an active content editor dedicated to obscure articles that often require references from libraries and newspapers. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  325. User:Vsmith English Wikipedia since July 04 - admin since 05, over 100K edits. Focus on geology and geography articles. Live out in the boonies with no access to a good library. Vsmith (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  326. User:Kathodonnell. English Wikipedia. I work mostly on Australian music articles, some arts and articles on Australian women, plus a few other topics to a lesser degree - finding references and RS for some of the existing articles + writing new articles for those missing. thanks. Kathodonnell (talk) 01:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  327. User:Ganeshk. I have been editing since 2005, have 33000 edits. I also operate a bot, User:Ganeshbot that has created more than 22000 new articles. Could use the research access with Indian history and marine life topics. — Ganeshk (talk) 02:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  328. User:Mitchazenia - English Wikipedia admin - I've been editing since November 2005 with 37,000 edits. 14 featured articles, work would go towards my three main topics, roads, railroads and hurricanes. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 02:51, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  329. jeremyb. English Wikipedia editor. I'll use this account to research the history of timezones and Time in Indiana. P.S. you should change the primary timezone to UTC (or WST) for the links in the "Process" section. You could also provide times in additional timezones or link to a converter with the UTC time prepopulated. Jeremyb (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  330. 99of9 English Wikipedia and Commons. Chemistry, physics, and mathematics. Australian geography, biology, history and news. --99of9 (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  331. SpeedyGonsales Croatian Wikipedia and Commons, over 21.000 edits. Access to quality resources is always helpful. SpeedyGonsales 05:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  332. NCurse work 06:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC) - Over 9000 edits in medical and scientific topics.[reply]
  333. JN466 06:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC) en:WP, de:WP, 45000+ edits; religions, current affairs[reply]
  334. User:Lionelt. English Wikipedia. My primary topic areas are politics and Christianity. Creator of portal:Conservatism and founder of WP:WikiProject Conservatism. 17000 edits, 3 years experience.– Lionel (talk) 06:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  335. User:Nug. English Wikipedia. My interest is in the Baltic states, its history, culture and current affairs. Access to HighBeam would be fantastic as it has tons of stuff related to the Baltics, but have been unable to access it. Been editing since 2006, having over 16,000 edits and created over 90 articles. --Nug (talk) 08:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  336. User:Ynhockey. Active on the English Wikipedia since late 2004 (admin since 2008), with over 50,000 edits. Interest primary in Middle Eastern history and military history, but also computer science topics. Have written and intend to continue to write articles based on obscure topics with high-quality sources (so far mostly print), for which popular sources don't usually suffice. —Ynhockey (Talk) 10:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  337. User:The Four Deuces Editor since 2007 with 1000s of edits. Have created and edited articles primarily in political science, including biographies. Intend to use this resource to start biographies of individuals who are red-linked and expand stub biographies where little free on-line material is available. TFD (talk) 10:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  338. User:Itti Active on the de.Wikipedia since 2005 with 15000 edits. Interests: politics, art, historical, etc. HB archive will be useful for expansion, verification etc. --Itti (talk) 11:13, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  339. User:Djembayz. English Wikipedia since 2010, 4,300 edits. Write articles for WikiProject Ships; add citations, expand/format GLAM/Smithsonian articles, rural areas, 1930s; add categories on Commons. Have focused on pre-1923 sailing ships due to copyright restrictions; would like to move into some more current (and more widely read) topics.Djembayz (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  340. User:Touchatou Mainly French (also English) Wikipedia since Jan. 2009. Mainly academic articles on economics, sociology, demography, politics, history, statistics, mathematics, science and some weird topics. Avid user of academic articles. Touchatou (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  341. Morray Mainly on de, but also smaller contributions on different languages. Focused mainly on topics of natural sciences but also random other topics. --Morray (talk)
  342. Baba Tabita, bureaucrat at Swahili Wikipedia; 32,000+ edits since April 2006; content creation, expansion and referencing, esp. on biographies (20th century scientists, politicians and literary writers) and on Subsaharan African languages and literatures; access would be highly appreciated for both of these fields. --Baba Tabita (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  343. Floydian, English Wikipedia since 2003. Primarily focused on the history of civic infrastructure and geography, also dabbling into music, chemicals and medicine. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 13:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  344. User:WLU, English Wikipedia since 2006, 48,000 edits since then, I check sources, citegnome, expand content and dabble on noticeboards on a variety of content pages. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 14:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  345. KWa, mainly active on the German-language Wikipedia, had five featured articles on the German Wikipedia since 2005 and some 3.200 edits. Primarily focused on theatre and literature history and research, also working on music and architecture. --83.246.65.143 (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  346. QuasyBoy (talk · contribs), active on English Wikipedia since 2006, well over a thousand edits. I mostly create and edit entertainment articles. QuasyBoy 14:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  347. User:Petri Krohn, started editing in 2005, about 60,000 edits in all Wikimedia projects. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  348. User:Amartyabag, an editor in English Wikipedia since 2005 with 8000 edits. Primarily focused on creating content, referencing works related to Protected areas in India, Geography, etc. with top contributors in FA's like West Bengal, Kolkata, ex-FA's like Kaziranga National Park. Amartyabag TALK2ME 16:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  349. User:Guillaume2303, started 2007, 70,000+ edits on en.WP. Occasionally have the need for something in Highbeam, but if there are more editors wanting this resource than there are accounts available, don't include me in the random "lottery" :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:33, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  350. Postdlf (talk · contribs), active on English Wikipedia since 2003, over 69,000 edits. I have created many articles on animal species, some of which are rare/obscure/recently described and difficult to find free papers about online. I also have created a lot of articles on U.S. law and court cases, for which access to scholarly journal articles would be invaluable because very little is free online aside from the primary source materials and mainstream news. Other interests include biographies of artists and politicians. #postdlf (talk) 16:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  351. User:Tito Dutta Psychology, Indian history, biography related articles. If this Highbeam helps in research works that'll be great. They allow 7 days free trial in their site, but, I have not tried that. Have more than 5000 edits. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 16:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  352. User:MeegsC, English Wikipedia since 2007, 12,000+ edits, primarily in bird-related articles. This would be particularly useful for new article research and for improving referencing in existing articles; I spend a fair bit of time doing the latter for articles on the WP:BIRDS cleanup listing, but am unable to access some references due to expensive paywalls. MeegsC | Talk 17:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  353. User:Mojoworker English Wikipedia and Commons. Active since 2007 in a variety of topics mainly in WP:MILHIST. In serious need of something to suplement the Google News Archive which seems not to work as well as it used to.
  354. Seduisant. English Wikipedia, active since 2005. Contributions chiefly to articles about felids, and creation/maintenance of articles about little-known people, animals, and events. HighBeam would aid in sourcing these efforts. --Seduisant (talk) 17:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  355. Rufous-crowned Sparrow. English Wikipedia and a bit of Commons. 8000 edits since 2006 leading to 5 FAs, 3 FLs, 9 current GAs, and 13 DYKs. While at a university, it does not offer HighBeam and I don't have summer access to the subscriptions it does provide. Mostly bird articles, although I may be start on some of the more odd and ancient bony fishes soon. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  356. Pete Tillman. Active since 2008, currently among the 4000 most active editors. I would use the account for technical reports -- I contribute regularly to Geoscience , Atmospheric and Spacce Science articles. --Pete Tillman (talk) 18:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  357. User:Gsingh. Have 2500+ edits on the EN wikipedia, been an editor since 2005. Would use this for adding sources for articles about Punjab (India) Politics, Canadian Politics, and anything within the scope of WP:DENTISTRY. Gsingh (talk) 17:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  358. User:Gregbard English Wikipedia. 6 years contributing. 50000+ edits. I work mainly in the area of philosophy, and especially logic, both very underrepresented areas. I am not affiliated with any university currently. I rely mainly on my own personal library and online sources. I am very involved with the all aspects of WikiProject Philosophy.Greg Bard (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  359. User:David Eppstein. English Wikipedia, Admin. Over 56k edits, over 5 years experience. Primary areas of interest are mathematics, computer science, academic biography, and California geography. This access looks particularly useful for biography (e.g. newspaper obituary) and geography sourcing. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  360. User:Incnis Mrsi. English Wikipedia, 2,141 edits in the article space (to 1,655 distinct pages). Occasionally active in other Wikimedia projects (e.g. Commons and, formerly, Russian Wikipedia) with 15,000+ edits in total. 6 years experience. Crazed with improving the quality, not of some chosen set of articles, but of Wikipedia as a whole. I intend to use HighBeam for improving articles on science, information technology and occasionally other topics such as history. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  361. User:Goethean. I've been an editor of the English Wikipedia for eight years and nine months. I have made 34,109 edits (21,810 edits in article space) to 5,199 distinct pages. I am the creator of 109 new articles. HighBeam would be very helpful to me in improving articles on philosophy, religion, literature, politics. — goethean ॐ 18:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  362. User:Ben MacDui. Five plus years of editing, Five FAs, 8 FLS, 27 GAs, mostly interested in Scottish history and geography. English Wikipedia admin with c. 33,000 edits. Ben MacDui 19:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  363. User:Tryptofish. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2008, over 23,000 edits, very involved in content creation and sourcing. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  364. User:dger Wikipedian for over 3 years with over 10,000 edits on English wikipedia and over a 1000 uploads on Wikipedia commons. I work mainly on nature and science oriented articles. I would like an account to access biology related journals. Dger (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  365. User:Andrew Dalby. Editor on Latin, English and French Wikipedias since 2006, admin on Latin, about 110,000 edits in total. Creating and improving articles in biography, history (especially medieval and ancient), literature. Andrew Dalby 20:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  366. First Light Editor on English Wikipedia for four years, 18,000 edits, mostly content, 3 GAs, 25 DYKs. No local library (to speak of) or university access. First Light (talk) 20:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  367. Shannon1 Been editing since 2009 – 1 FA, 13 GAs, 21,000 edits, mostly in geography/civil engineering. I have an interest in journals/articles of that sort. Shannºn 20:16, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  368. Mr. Stradivarius. I have been editing Wikipedia actively since Octobter 2010, wtih 14,000+ edits. I am primarily interested in applied linguistics articles, and I also help out with general article improvement and sourcing. I would particularly like to have access to the linguistics resources that HighBeam offers. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 20:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  369. Asad112 Had an account with Wikipedia since 2006, been active since 2010. Would love the use of the tool to be able to consolidate research and sources. -asad (talk) 21:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  370. Jiujitsuguy. Active member since 2009 with over 4,000 edits. Created nine articles and expanded several stubs. I have an interest in military history with an emphasis on the Baltic and Middle East regions.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 22:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  371. User:Maky. English Wikipedia, Commons. I write FA-quality articles about lemurs and related topics. I intend to continue researching and writing about lemurs, and possibly fossil primtes. – Maky « talk » 23:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  372. User:SatuSuro. Editing over 5 years, over 80k of edits, across diverse projects and subjects - very interested in checking for areas where extra ref sources can make the difference in the quality of the Wp en experience SatuSuro 23:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  373. mgiganteus1 (talk). Been an active editor for more than 6 years. 55k edits or so, including several hundred new article contributions. Main areas of interest are botany and zoology. mgiganteus1 (talk) 01:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  374. Wasted Time R. Have been an active editor for over 7 years, with 60,000 edits. Have 6 FA, 36 GA, and 48 DYK to my name, with many other article creations. Primary topics are politics, history, and music, but have touched other topics as well. I do heavy amounts of historical research and writing and have frequently run into source material within HighBeam, and having a full access account would be very, very useful. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  375. Glimmer721: Joined May 2010 and over 9,000 edits, contributed to 15 passed good articles so far, two books and 13 TV episodes. I believe I could use HighBeam to find sources and especially reviews of older novels and TV episodes, as my major contributions have often been limited to things that have been released recently. Glimmer721 talk 01:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  376. Maias. Active editor for 5+ years with c.45k edits and 1000+ new articles. Main interests: biology, history and biography. Maias (talk) 01:55, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  377. Arbitrarily0 - On the English Wikipedia I have been an active contributor since 2008, and an administrator since 2009. Some of my past and future research interests lie in physics and mechanical engineering. I am also active on Wikimedia Commons. Thanks for this opportunity, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  378. User:JoannaSerah: English Wikipedia. Joined March 3, 2006; over 13,000 edits. Primary focus is poetry/literature, politics and North & South Carolina. Have created a few articles, but mostly spend time expanding existing articles -- JoannaSerah (talk) 02:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  379. User:Supreme Deliciousness: English Wikipedia. Joined May 29, 2009; over 16,000 edits. Been active on the site since registration. Have created some articles. Mostly edit articles related to the Middle East and its history. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 02:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  380. Mr.Atoz English Wikipedia. Joined October 2007. Working on Georgia Hospitals Template and improving the Hospitals in Georgia List Mr.Atoz (talk) 03:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  381. User:Severo. English Wikipedia since July 2006, somewhere over 100,000 edits. I work on recent but pre-internet history of sports and in particular cycling. SeveroTC 05:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  382. User:Hallows AG English Wikipedia since July 2011. 13000 edits. I do vandalism work and additions to articles about countries.--Hallows Aktiengesellschaft (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  383. User:Centovalli German Wikipedia since 2010, with emphasis on motorcycles. --Centovalli (talk) 09:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  384. Joe Roe. Registered in 2005 but not really active editing until late 2010, just over 4000 edits. I mainly work on archaeology and indigenous rights articles but I've found since I graduated and lost access to my university's library and journal subscriptions it's been a lot harder to write new content. Hopefully this can fill the gap. joe•roet•c 09:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  385. User:Gripweed. Editor and administrator of the German speaking Wikipedia. More than 40.000 edits in 6 years. I'm interested in all kinds of articles. My emphasis now is the subject Outlaw motorcycle clubs, but I'm also interested in popular music and biographies of not-so-well-known persons. --Gripweed (talk) 10:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  386. User:Snowmanradio. I have been editing here for more than six years, and I have made more than 76,000 edits on the English Wikipedia and more than 48,000 edits on Commons. Snowman (talk) 11:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  387. User:Le_Deluge. 1994 edits in mainspace, 3973 in total since Jan 2009. I tend to flit around a bit, doing a lot of tidying work across the board; most of the articles I bump into on Highbeam relate to Scottish culture and history.Le Deluge (talk) 13:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  388. User:Density. German Wikipedia, more than 25.000 edits since 2005, with emphasis on classical music and natural sciences. --Density (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  389. Bronto, Slovak Wikipedia, more than 104.000 edits since 2004 16:03 6 April 2012 (UTC)
  390. User:Albacore. English Wikipedia. Over 5,000 edits, with 17 DYKs and eight featured lists. Would use to expand and reference sports stubs. Albacore (talk) 16:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  391. User:NSH001. very nearly 10k edits on en:wp, approaching 1k on other-langauge wikis, 7 DYKs so far. Heavily content-oriented, strong emphasis on quality over quantity. Wide range of topics but including biographies of scientists, Quakers and antiwar activists, middle east politics. NSH001 (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  392. user:Shrike English Wikipedia. 3200+ edits since May. 2006. Mainly interested in Middle east history.So I want to use the account to improve the references there. --Shrike (talk) 18:08, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  393. user:Rlbberlin German Wikipedia editor since 2006; >12.000 edits; editing art history --Rlbberlin (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  394. user:Vasiľ, Slovak Wikipedia, 5 years, more than 80 000 edits. Vasiľ (talk) 22:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  395. user:Nelliette, Slovak Wikipedia, 3 years, 10 373 edits.--Nelliette (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  396. User:Michael Fleischhacker, German Wikipedia, almost 2 years, 10,000+ edits, mainly Austrian-related topics, history, politics etc. --Michael Fleischhacker (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  397. User:Edinburgh Wanderer, English Wikipedia over 26,00 edits joined March 2008. Edits mainly in football, Scotland and theatre. Edinburgh Wanderer 00:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  398. user:14nu5, Slovak Wikipedia, 3 years, 8 200+ edits. I write articleas about ancient history (esp. ancient Egypt) and occulture. — 14nu5 (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  399. user:GFHandel. About 6,500 edits in almost 4.5 years (with 63% in article space). I've added about 100 articles to en.WP, and plan to add many more in the area of music. Having access to better research material will assist me greatly in that endeavour. GFHandel ♬  00:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  400. User:Donlammers. Not quite 11,000 edits in a bit over 2.5 years. I was going to skip this offer until I just ran into yet another case of Highbeam saving a dead link. Don Lammers (talk) 01:43, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  401. User:Vecrumba. EN wikipedia. Editing focused primarily on history, modern European geopolitics with focus on Eastern Europe and Russia; diaspora studies; miltary history; race and intelligence. 7+ years, 17,000+ edits. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 02:01, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  402. User:Juliancolton. enwiki and commons mainly. About 150,000 edits cross-wiki, written/contributed to something like 30 FAs and 100 GAs, been editing for four or five years now. Mostly intend to utilize newspaper archives for research in historic meteorological events. Juliancolton (talk) 03:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  403. Acroterion, 6 years, enwiki admin, more than 100,000 edits, 2 GAs, something over 1000 new articles. Concentration on architecture, historical structures, military architecture, protected natural and historical areas. Acroterion (talk) 03:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  404. User:Worm That Turned. enwiki admin, 4 years, 10k edits, 7 GAs. I've got my eye on a few series of articles, primarily food and drink, which I've already started working on and hope to progress this year. WormTT · (talk) 08:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  405. User:Colonel Warden Active content creator and improver for 5+ years now. Warden (talk) 10:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  406. User:Xavxav Registered in 2008 on the French Wikipedia but really active since december 2011 (this is why I have slightly less than 1000 edits, I hope I still can qualify). Interested in economics and sociology. Always keen on searching Google Books and Google Scholar for any additional sources to improve Wikipedia. Xavxav (talk) 13:25, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  407. R8R Gtrs English (in future possibly Russian) Wiki, ~2.5 years, focus on chemical elements articles (see fluorine for example--even this is not the end!), would appreciate the journal articles database access. Not much in quantity of edits (although I do have the required 1,000 in the article space alone), but they are often more productive than usual.--R8R Gtrs (talk) 13:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  408. User:MishaKeats Way, way, below the 1,000 edits, but thought I'd give it a shot anyway. Teaching and writing experience in politics and music. As I gradually learn to control my fear of HTML, I'll be able to increase my contribution rate.--Misha Atreides (talk) 15:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  409. User:Orderinchaos Admin on English Wikipedia, and have had my account for over 6 years. Have over 66,000 edits to the encyclopaedia including 34,366 edits to mainspace (according to X!'s Edit Counter), one FA and several GAs, and am active in content generation, research and content verification across a range of Australian topics including politics, history and demography. Many of the sources I need are simply not available through my limited student access. Orderinchaos 15:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  410. User:Kvng English Wikipedia. I work on technical articles, specifically audio, electrical engineering and networking. History includes adding and verification of references. --Kvng (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  411. Pburka English Wikipedia. ~7500 edits since 2005. Active in WP:UBLPR and creating WP:DCB article. Pburka (talk) 18:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  412. Orenburg1 English Wikipedia. ~8000 edits since 2009. Active on WP Sciuridae and copyediting/verification. WP email enabled. Do not have access to journal/scientific databases which would be very useful. Orenburg1 (talk) 21:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  413. Blue Elf Admin on Norwegian (bokmål) Wikipedia. Since 2005 52,000+ edits of which 44,000+ on no-wiki. Sports, geography, some music and history. Categorizing, correcting language, content verification. Blue Elf (talk) 21:51, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  414. User:Saedon English Wikipedia. I edit a lot of articles that deal with WP:FRINGE theories and many of these subjects are difficult to source. Note that this account is relatively new as I recently retired my main account User:Noformation which had upwards of 7000 edits and was registered (IIRC) in 2007. SÆdontalk 23:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  415. Toll Booth Willie English Wikipedia. About 2,300 edits, joined 2006. Main sphere of editing is the history of newspapers and newspaper companies in the USA, Canada, Spain and the Caribbean. Other topics I envision editing this year include local politics of New England, journalism in other Spanish-speaking areas, and 19th century baseball. Have access to Massachusetts newspaper archives but other states', plus business and trade journals, would be very useful. ``` t o l l ` b o o t h ` w i l l i e `` $1.25 PLEASE ``` 00:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  416. User:Yobol English Wikipedia. Active in medical articles. Yobol (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  417. User:Saehrimnir. I am mostly aktiv in German Wikipedia but likely to ramp up in the english as well in the near futur. I mostly work on science related Artikles but also scientist Biographies and science history were this would come quiet handy.--Saehrimnir (talk) 00:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  418. User:Lothar von Richthofen. English Wikipedia mostly, occasionally Commons, a smattering of edits at German Wikipedia. Over 10,000 edits at en-wp since March 2009. Lots of copyediting, some translation and content creation work in the area of military history and European topics. Content creation has been hindered thus far by limited access to sources; have plans to get Wikipedia:WikiProject Frisia on the map over the summer by improving articles up to GA or higher. This would help greatly with both. ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  419. User:Askedonty. French Wikipedia, here 1k restricting to articles. Write or translate history and describe systems. I'm interested into archives for both and cross-checking. -- Askedonty (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  420. User:Karl.brown. English wikipedia. about 1500 edits. some gnome stuff, category reorganization, and research on health, health systems, health informatics articles. --Karl.brown (talk) 04:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  421. User:Gnangarra 20k+ en edits since mid 2005, editted across a broad article subject matter including some FA's, primary use would be related BLP issues and as an reviewer of FAC to explore additional sourcing. Gnangarra 04:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  422. User:Estlandia mostly on English Wikipedia, 9000+ edits since October 2008, started 80 articles, content creation mostly on Russian history and politics, gnomish activities on world political parties.Estlandia (dialogue) 08:52, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  423. User:Matthiasb. German Wikipedia, some 40,000+ in article name space. Mostly edits on geography, natural disasters and In the news topics, many translations of NRHP articles. The account wold be used to improve articles on those topics. --Matthiasb (talk) 09:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  424. User:Acadēmica Orientālis. I registered as user:Miradre in October 2010 but had to create a new account in February 2012 due to losing my passwords due to hard drive failure. 2000+ edits since that date alone (content creation, expansion, verification) with emphasis on evolutionary psychology and China. I research and add numerous scholarly and other sources to Wikipedia so access to HighBeam would be useful. Acadēmica Orientālis (talk) 12:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  425. User:Philaweb. 18,000+ edits in 5+ years with 1,000+ articles created on the English Wikipedia. 8,000+ edits in 5+ years with 1,400+ articles created on the Danish Wikipedia. Content creation mainly in the context of WikiProject Latvia on both wikipedias. Would like to find sources that can enable expansion of created articles and new articles within the field of European geography and history-related articles. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 13:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  426. User:Neotarf. While I am a somewhat newer user than preferred, I am placing my request here in case there are extra subscriptions available. Like many newer users, I prefer creating new content to maintaining existing articles. My first article, although still in somewhat rough form, has already gotten 700-some hits in less than two months, and the topic has since been covered by the English-speaking mainstream media for the first time, in part, I believe, because of the extensive sourcing I did on the article. In the near future, I plan to write about several contemporary artists. My main interests are human rights, the Middle East, and Wikipedia article titling policy. I live in a region where the internet is heavily censored, and have no access to sources outside of the internet. Neotarf (talk) 16:45, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  427. User:Davewild approx 40,000 edits, admin from 2007, HighBeam would be very useful on the election and current affairs articles I usually edit/create. Davewild (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  428. User:Kyteto. Unrestricted access to this large archive would be greatly appreciated in my chosen field of interest, overhauling and refitting aircraft articles, in coordination with WP:Aircraft. Over the last four years I have worked extensively on many articles to improve content quality and especially verification, I feel I have made a real difference to 30-40 or so articles, which I have linked on my userpage for prosterity. I plan to be heavily editing more articles in the future, and another tool in my arsenal would enable my efforts to go further and add more to these articles. On countless research runs on different aviation matters I have encountered Highbeam articles, it would be far easier to use and incorperate them as sources if I could actually view the majority of the content instead of a restricted preview. Kyteto (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  429. User:Teslaton. Slovak Wikipedia, 4 years, 1000+ local/2000+ global edits. IT/electric.eng. In fact, more technical editing, than real copywriting, but yet access can be useful from time to time… --Teslaton (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  430. Adam Zábranský. Czech Wikipedia, almost 4 years, 13000+ edits. I'm content creator (13 GA), I write mostly about science, interesting people and Middle Eastern states. --Adam Zábranský (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  431. Jaan. English Wikipedia. 14,000 edits, mostly creating or editing content. Have created 66 articles. The main topics are and will be history and geography of Estonia and pop music of the 1960s. Jaan Pärn (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  432. January. Editor since 2009, 19,000 edits, 12 DYKs and 1 GA. January (talk) 21:27, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  433. Girlwithgreeneyes Editor since 2009. 2,900 edits. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  434. Berita German Wikipedia, active since 2008, > 3,000 edits.--Berita (talk) 22:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  435. L.tak English wikipedia (officially dutch wikipedia as home wikipedia, but not many edits there), with >5000 edits; editing since 2007 I believe. Various interests (dutch subjects; identity documents; treaties) and looking forward to using/evaluating this as a sourcing opportunity. L.tak (talk) 22:58, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  436. sephia karta | dimmi 00:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC) > 3000 edits, active since 2006, mostly with Wikipedia:WikiProject Abkhazia, mostly interested in news wires from the nineties & noughties.[reply]
  437. jc37 - En.Wikipedia administrator. Over 6 years, 30k+ edits. This would be helpful to check references. As for me, I have multiple interests (several noted at User:jc37/Userboxes). - jc37 00:29, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  438. Sasata – I meet the qualifications and do not have access through my university account. Sasata (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  439. User:Cloveapple. English Wikipedia. 3,500+ edits. There are some articles I'm having trouble referencing that this would be a help on. I've added references to some poorly referenced articles and helped to improve a few that were up for deletion. Cloveapple (talk) 02:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  440. User:TonyTheTiger. English Wikipedia. Nearly 200,000 edits. I write University of Michigan- and Chicago-related biographies often about athletes. I also write about a lot of sports teams for the University and City. I intend to do broad and general research largely focused on these areas. I also have lately begun writing old television epsisodes. I have a wide variety of other editorial interests but these are my focuses.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  441. User:Biosketch – English Wikipedia; 4,500+ edits; member of WikiProject Companies, where HighBeam articles are an exceedingly valuable resource; have created 40 articles, of which several were DYKs.—Biosketch (talk) 07:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  442. User:stone – English Wikipedia; Improved most of the GA chemical elements articles. (Chromium, Nickel, Potassium ....) --Stone (talk) 09:03, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  443. HaeB - Active since 2003 on the English Wikipedia (over 19000 live edits) and German Wikipedia (over 35000), frequently checking changes to articles on my watchlist, verifying and adding sources. Thanks! Regards, HaeB (talk) 09:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  444. Armbrust - Active since December 2008 on the English Wikipedia with over 100,000 edits. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 10:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  445. User:Markus Schulenburg - English Wikipedia ~150 Edits and German Wikipedia ~10000 (home wiki), frequently checking changes to articles on my watchlist, verifying and adding sources. Thanks! Regards, --Markus S. (talk) 12:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  446. Regiomontanus (talk) German Wikipedia (sometimes en), active since 2004, ~31.000 edits de. Topics: biology, geology, archeology. Quality checks and improvement of various articles. --Regiomontanus (talk) 12:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  447. User:Viridiscalculus. Over 6000 edits in close to 2 1/2 years in the English Wikipedia, almost all of it related to the U.S. Roads WikiProject. I intend to use the service to research the history of highways in Maryland and other states, and help other editors who are doing the same.  VC  13:02, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  448. User:Nanobear. I've been active since late 2007, have performed over 12000 edits, created over 80 articles and authored 13 DYKs. I always do a lot of research for my content contributions, and I'm always in need of more sources. Nanobear (talk) 17:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  449. User:Duschgeldrache2. I'm writing mainly in German Wikipedia (sometimes also in Commmons) and I'm active there under this account since February 2007 with nearly 5000 edits, writing in different fields. Since 2010 I'm servicing the German Wikipedia's Faroe Islands portal. --Duschgeldrache2 (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  450. User:Taylornate. Active in Project Medicine. I mainly concentrate on articles related to plastic / reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.--Taylornate (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  451. Pmlineditor - Primarily Simple Wikipedia, 4 FAs and 7 GAs there plus 150+ created articles and 3 GAs here. Admin on four content projects. 3 years active with 30k+ edits. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 18:54, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  452. User:Puffin. Active on the English Wikipedia for over a year, 13,000+ edits, improved Djungarian hamster to GA standard and hoping to improve many rodent related articles in the future. Puffin Let's talk! 20:20, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  453. User:raeky Long time wikipedian with many edits. — raekyt 02:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Applicants for round 2, April 16th to May 1

These were sent out successfully May 2. A minority of the codes failed to deliver because recipients' email addresses were not enabled. If you didn't get your code, drop a note on my talk page.Ocaasi t | c 16:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC) [reply]

  1. User:Tom harrison, editor since 2004, 43000 edits. Tom Harrison Talk 13:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Armchair QB. Active on English Wikipedia since May 2009, editing football-related articles (NFL, college football, alternative professional leagues). Armchair QB (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Nageh – Active on the English Wikipedia for more than 3 year with 4500+ edits. Content contributor to a variety of topics, though with a focus on engineering, mathematics, computer science, and geopolitics. Nageh (talk) 20:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I'm about five weeks short of the 1-year requirement, so I'll quite understand if that automatically rules me out, but I have more than 9000 edits in the time I've been here. Access to Highbeam's journal articles would allow me to branch out from my mainly copyediting/gnomish tasks to creating and improving articles on folklore, literature, and social history. George Ponderevo (talk) 22:25, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Nerêo - Active on the Spanish Wikipedia since April 11, 2006 with 51943 edits (52245 in all proyects + others users). I created 553 new articles in Spanish Wikipedia (History, Geography, ...)--Nerêo (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Magister Mathematicae Active on spanish wikipedia, 7 year old contributor with +46000 edits on spanish wikipedia and +27000 edits on english wikipedia. Work on mathematics related articles. Magister Mathematicae (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Jayjg. Long-time wikipedian, over 100,000 edits. 7 FAs, 8 GAs, many other articles created. Jayjg (talk) 01:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Montgomery. User of es.Wikipedia since 2006 with up to 35000 edits. I used to verify and expand the content of new articles. Montgomery (talk) 11:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Kismalac Active on spanish wikipedia, 3 year contributor with +3000 edits, mostly related to physics and mathematics. Kismalac (talk) 11:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. whpq (talk · contribs) Editor since December 2005, and over 40K edits. I am member of WikiProject Unreferenced articles, and previously worked on Unreferenced BLP Rescue reducing the backlog to zero. -- Whpq (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Padraic (talk · contribs) Editor since 2004, 10K global edits, do lots of work adding citations. --Padraic 17:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. YuMaNuMa (talk · contribs) Account created in December 2010, have been editing since June 2011, I have just under 2000 edits, a large portion of which are article edits. I frequently work on articles of a smaller size thus reliable sources do become quite scarce at times. YuMaNuMa Contrib 17:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Uranus95 (talk · contribs) German Wikipedia since 2004, 2000+ edits, i work on the economic history of the twenties and thirties
  14. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs) Veteran editor, class 3 (over 16K edits). My home is in paleobiology, zoology, and mythology.
  15. Tomtomn00 (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia since 2010 (4000+ edits), German Wikipedia, French Wikipedia, Commons, Latvian Wikipedia. When I write articles (around 40-50 now) I always add sources to them, no matter what. I often add sources to unsourced articles, or improve the sources. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 18:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC) - Editing since 2005 in English, Hebrew, Russian, Catalan and Esperanto. Also editing in Wikisource and Wiktionary. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. TXiKi - Editing Wikipedia since 2006. Mainly on Basque Wikipedia, but also on Catalan, Spanish, and English Wikipedias. Running interwiki bot (TXiKiBoT) since late 2006. TXiKi (talk) 20:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. thegreatdr (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia since 2006, (37,000+ edits). Been part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones for six years. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington (talk · contribs), enwp admin/editor since January 2006 with ~15000 edits.
  20. Hemanshu (talk · contribs) - Active editor since 2003, more than 10,000 edits to English wikipedia, started Gujarati & Marathi editions of Wikipedia. --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Manjel (talk) 20:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC) German Wikipedia since 2008, more than 3,000 edits[reply]
  22. Philip Cross (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC) on English Wikipedia since October 2004, 48,000 edits, created about 160 articles, mainly work on biographies.[reply]
  23. DarTar. Editing since 2004 on enwiki, itwiki, frwiki, commons, meta, 4.8K global edits, WMF staff and co-editor of the Research Newsletter constantly hitting paywalls since I lost access via academic subscriptions.
  24. Pontificalibus I like to rescue articles tagged for deletion by finding sources, and also expand articles on 19th and early 20th corporations, amongst others, so I think this would be a useful asset for me --Pontificalibus (talk) 22:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Calliopejen1 Editor since 2005 (under User:Calliopejen), administrator since 2007, over 70,000 edits with current account. Interested in combatting systemic bias with coverage of topics traditionally of interest to women (e.g. fashion) and coverage of the developing world. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. John Carter - longtime editor, about 150K total edits, although many of those are minor, interest in developing material on primarily the developing world, religion, and books, on the last particularly which sources available are and are not particularly good, and in what areas. John Carter (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. 23:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Editor since 2004, with an interest in naval history from the early 1900s (or any obscure naval topics). 29,525 edits on this account. Arbitrator emeritus (with all the nonsense that entails). Currently working for Wikimedia UK, organising training sessions for new Wikipedians - and participating in the World War 1 Editathon. My wife is also an administrator on Wikipedia. The Cavalry (Message me) 23:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:Julle About 15K global edits. Do write content, but would mainly use it to source and save notable and verifiable articles that risk deletion because said notability and verifiability haven't been proved. Mainly active on Swedish Wikipedia. /Julle (talk) 00:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ezhiki (talk · contribs). Active since 2004; interested mainly in geography and political structure of Russia. Having access to English-language sources would be invaluable.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 12, 2012; 00:49 (UTC)
  30. User:Mrschimpf - Active since May 2005 on en.wiki with over 26,000 edits, would use resources mainly to prop up coverage of media subjects such as television and radio histories which are hard to trace without hours of library and microfilm access. Nate • (chatter) 05:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. User:Lihaas - First started sometime in 2008 with over 20,000 edits. Mostly work on election articles from around the world, particularly the small countries outside the anglosphere of USA, UK, Canada and Australia and expand stubs to actual content. (See Finnish parliamentary election, 2011 that we almost got to FA.) Also work on current events and expansions beyond stub creations and target DYK as a measure of a good new article. Ive made many articles that went on to global relevance like Tawakel Karman and Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa.Lihaas (talk) 08:53, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Dr. Blofeld - Would be useful for a wide range of articles.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:17, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:Shivanarayana mostly active on italian wikipedia at present, in the past even on en.wiki with a former nick, mainly interested in history and science, worshiper of WP:CITE--Shivanarayana (talk) 21:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:Roscelese - registered since November 2005, 17K+ edits. My work on political and historical articles, particularly, would benefit from access to the database. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. User:RashersTierney - registered since 2007, 17K+ edits so far. Member of WikiProject Ireland (and a few others). Watch for new edits, mostly to ensure refs check out. Sorely miss my post-grad college access to similar databases for reference-checking on the project. RashersTierney (talk) 23:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Risker (talk) 03:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC) - Six years, 18K edits, will be useful for the content editing I plan to do in the next few months. Risker (talk) 03:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Xezbeth - user since 2004, ~47k edits, mainly interested in using it for missing articles on individual species. —Xezbeth (talk) 10:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid - Account since 2004, active since 2006, ~20k edits. Active in content development, particularly around WikiProject Ireland and in British/Irish areas in general. Verification and understanding of particularly complex and nuanced POV issues is a essential in the main area of my contributions. Access to a library of high-quality (and broad ranging) references such as HighBeam would be an enormous contribution to this area. I would be willing to act on behalf of others (i.e. respond to requests) in sourcing and verifying, if granted access. --RA (talk) 11:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. User:Hohenloh - 8,679 edits since June 2008 on English-language Wikipedia. Interested in using it for research for articles on general history, medical history, politics and the like. Hohenloh + 16:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Ched Davis active since 2008, many areas including: history, military, philosophy, sports.
  41. User:North8000 5 yrs (3 years active) 20k edits. Diverse areas with some focus on technical, folk music, northern geographic/history, & Scouting. North8000 (talk) 20:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Dream Focus I have been active on Wikipedia for 5 years, 8 months and 26 days. I have done a lot of searching for news articles for a rather large number of AFDs over the years, in order to find reliable sources providing the articles should not be deleted. This tool would help greatly. I have 17,803 edits. Dream Focus 20:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Kgorman-ucb year and a half of activity or so, ~5000 edits. I have access to some other resources when I'm on campus, but not highbeam itself and it would be useful for some old media sources. Kevin (kgorman-ucb) (talk) 20:54, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Jakew I've been active since 2003, and have made approx 15,000 edits. I maintain some difficult articles that require careful sourcing, and this would be invaluable. Jakew (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:Delicious carbuncle Beloved and respected editor with over 18K contributions since 2008. Main interest is BLP sourcing. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. User:Keilana I've been a Wikipedian since 2007 and have made more than 40,000 edits. I've worked all over the encyclopedia, but am currently working to improve the articles about the constellations. Having access to this service would be incredibly helpful in my research, because I could have access to academic articles for free, greatly expanding the scope of the articles I work on. Keilana|Parlez ici 21:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. PePeEfe active since 2008 on es.wiki with more than 8000 edits, mainly on palaeontology and geology. PePeEfe (talk) 21:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. User:Raintheone I registered in 2006, have 21000+ contributions and I have promoted articles via DYK and GAN. I concentrate on fictional characters and BLP articles - I have actively added real world content and exhaust every nook and cranny searching for sources. I think HighBeam would be an extremely useful tool and drive content building forward.Rain the 1 21:56, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. User:Salvador_alc Contributor in Spanish Wikipedia since March 2006 (~4500 edits). There, I edit articles about history and philosophy of religions. This tool would help me to create news articles and expand others, because the free sources online about this issues are poor. Salvador alc (talk) 22:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. User:Noon. Active since 2004, with more than 9,500 global contributions, mainly in the Hebrew Wikipedia, but also in the English Wikipedia and some others. 2 Featured articles in the Hebrew Wikipedia. HighBeam might be quite useful for me. Noon (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. User:Jasper Deng. Joined May 2008, active since early 2011. 19000+ edits here, with ~1200 on other Wikimedia wikis.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:Despayre. Member of the Guild of Copy Editors. While working for the guild I spend a lot of time, not only making grammatical repairs, but also adding additional citations when I can, as well as confirming cites of more controversial material. If you are using X!'s edit counter, you can see that the majority of my edits (over 50%) have been to articles themselves, and that of all of those edits, only 1.3% of them have been reverted. As a history student, I take citation of source matters very seriously. There are several different areas on WP that I would like to spend more time on, but I do enjoy copyediting as it gives me a chance to see many new articles that I may not have normally encountered, and I enjoy making those articles better when I can, this resource should help tremendously. I also edit when I am away from my home PC and can provide you with proof if needed, I have hundreds of other edits that don't have my username attached as well.-- Despayre  tête-à-tête 22:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. User:Aymatth2. I start a lot of articles on a variety of subjects. I often can see the HighBeam article has content that would be useful, but cannot see the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:43, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  54. User:Shearonink 9800+ edits, editing since March 2010. I just found out about this opportunity. So many times I've gone to verify content or to do in-depth research and have been stymied because I don't have access to a content database like HighBeam. HighBeam would be a big help in both WP:AFC issues and with my own content creation. Shearonink (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. User:Bidgee editor since 2005 with 44,000+ edits, my article creation, expansion and improvement has been limited to the amount of free sources I can use and having an HighBeam account would help me to find more sources. Bidgee (talk) 03:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. User:O'Dea. Veteran Editor active since 2004 with over 11,300 edits. Very wide ranging scope of interests with strong emphasis on Ireland. Some inter-wiki activity in other language wikis, Commons, Wikisource, Wiktionary, and so on. Keen to get hands on quality research material. — O'Dea (talk) 04:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. de:User:Minderbinder. (Caution: the SUL account Minderbinder belongs to me everywhere but on en:WP, thus I am signing with my rarely used en:WP account here.) Editor on the German Wikipedia since 2005 with 47.000+ edits, also active on Commons. Writing mainly on history, architecture and art. Easy access to journal articles would help a a lot. --Minderbinder-de (talk) 06:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  58. User:Jeanne boleyn Editor with over 80,000 edits, active on English Wikipedia since April 2008. I have created and edited many articles on the Northern Ireland Troubles issues so having access to HighBeam articles would greatly assist me in my research and vastly improve the quality of the articles.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. User:Jan eissfeldt 16k+ edits since march 2004 on de/en/es.wp. main focus: theoretical philosophy, history of ideas & economics. highbeam would provide me with access to social science-related stuff, relevant for wikipedia-topic areas on my to-do in the field of history of social science, i can't access otherwise, regards --Jan eissfeldt (talk) 07:44, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. User:PamD, editor on English Wikipedia since 2006, 52,000 edits, mostly wikignoming like stub-sorting and disambiguation work; it would be useful to have access to resources to find refs for unreferenced stubs, check information, etc. PamD 07:57, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. User:-jkb-, editor since 2004 (diff. projects like cs:wp, different wikisources etc., today mainly de:wp), some 47 000 edits total, some 25 000 edits in de:wp; writing mostly in hisory, political developments etc., still researching in these areas and it would be a great help, see de:Benutzer:-jkb-, -jkb- 08:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  62. User:Johnuniq. Active at enwiki since December 2007 with 20,000 edits. Much weaker content creation than many others above, but this tool would be useful when adding refs to expand some of the stubs I encounter. Johnuniq (talk) 08:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. User:NapHit. Editor on English wikipedia since 2007, I have improved over 40 lists and articles to good and featured status. An account would enable me to do more research and improve some of these articles and help me expand other articles to good and featured status. NapHit (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. User:Jamietw. Editor on English Wikipedia with over 2,500 edits. I am frequently active in WP:AfC and WP:NPP I feel this tool would be helpful in verifying information and adding references to new pages which have been submitted but don't have them. I could also use it to expand shorter articles from stubs through the information I could obtain through the website. Thank you for considering my application, Jamietw (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. User:Millbart. Editor and sysop on German wikipedia with more than 30,000 edits in all namespaces. Main topics: Business and economics, social sciences in general. Access to the wide variety of journals will help me verify and expand existing content, especially where NPOV is critical. Millbart (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. User:Alelapenya. Editor on Spanish Wikipedia since 2009 with above 23 000 edits. I'm interessing in articles on History and Politics. Alelapenya (talk) 11:07, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. User:Lugnad. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2005 with 7,500+ edits. Mainly Irish & Maritime topics. I would find such a resource very useful. Lugnad (talk) 12:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. User:Night of the Big Wind. Editor on the English (about 15000 edits) and Dutch Wikipedia (about 24000 edits). Active from 2010/2011 (English WP) and 2006 (Dutch WP). Main focus now on Michelin starred restaurants and chefs, Irish traditional musicians and Ireland. Access to the wide variety of journals will help me verify and expand existing content. Night of the Big Wind talk 13:58, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. User:Alaney2k Editor since 2006 with several good and featured articles, 51,000 edits. While I have been primarily expanding the content of the ice hockey pages, I also edit topics related to Toronto and Canada, films and aviation. I would very much appreciate access to Highbeam to further my research for Wikipedia. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. User:Wsiegmund Active on English Wikipedia with almost 10,000 edits since 2005. I contribute mainly to biological and other science-related articles and expect to continue to do the same. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. User:Kablammo. 20,000+ edits over six years, majority to articles. Thanks for considering me. Kablammo (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. User:Billreid. Edit British medieval articles and main editor to 2 GA articles plus one currently under consideration. Nearly 6k edits. --Bill Reid | (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  73. User:Ankitbhatt. Have edited for a little over three years, and currently have over 8,000 edits. Major work has been devoted to content addition. Specialty is films. I have two good articles to my credit, one of which is currently being expanded to featured article status. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:42, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. User:SandyGeorgia. en.wiki. I missed the first round-- am I too late? I've been editing since 2006, have about 140,000 edits, and my focus is on editing medical articles, which typically requires access to full text of journal articles. Along with resigning as FAC delegate so I could focus more on medical articles, I also have recently relocated and have no access to a medical library or journal databases. I have also recently begun new page patrolling of medical articles, and while I often encounter what looks like copyvio, I'm unable to doublecheck journal articles. I'd appreciate being considered for this access. Thanks! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. User:Snappy. Editor since 2005 on English Wikipedia with over 60,000 edits, mainly on Irish politics and history. Access to HighBeam would be very useful for me. Snappy (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. User:Dennis Bratland. Mostly new articles related to WikiProject Motorcycling, also biographies like Thomas Krens, Thomas M. Messer, Edith Macefield. Frequently need access to Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune archives via HighBeam. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. User:Gilderien Highly active (>100 edits/month) Wikipedian, > 1 year tenure and verging on 3000 edits, would be useful in content work.--Gilderien Talk|Contribs 18:08, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. user:Fluffernutter. 4 years active, about 28k edits. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. User:Foxj - Wikipedian of almost six years, around 28,000 edits across a number of Wikimedia project sites. Co-author of several featured and "good" articles, as well as featured lists, pictures, sounds, portals and topics. — foxj 18:42, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. User:Wikiwind. Active on Serbian wikipedia with over 10.000 edits, mainly on politics, law, LGBT topics...--В и к и T 19:24, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. user:OohBunnies! - Been editing for two years, over 2,500 edits. I think access would help at AfC for expanding articles and also hopefully for topics I want to cover like UK literature. OohBunnies! Leave a message 21:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. User:Contains Mild Peril - had a Wikipedia account since 2007, >1,300 edits in a variety of subject areas: particularly interested in popular music articles and in adding citations demonstrating notability in articles which may be threatened with deletion. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 21:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. User:Shuki. WP for over six years and 10000 edits. Working mainly on creating and expanding articles in WP:Israel and WP:Judaism. --Shuki (talk) 01:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. User:Agadant. Active since 2006 with over 12,000 edits on musicians and related articles and on biographies. Have created 80 articles and added content with sourcing to many more. Have 2 GA articles. Agadant (talk) 02:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. User:Muhandes. Active on the English Wikimedia since 2007, more than 80,000 edits. Though most of my work is cleanup and anti-vandalism related, I have created about a hundred articles, mostly about lighthouses, including three GA articles and 38 DYK. I intend to work in the future on more lighthouse articles but also to contribute to Education in India articles and to popular music ones. --Muhandes (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. User:Rivertorch. Active account since 2006, >10k edits. This would be a help in content creation, including article expansion, and for improving refs in various places. Rivertorch (talk) 06:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. User:Karthikndr: I call myself as ciator, always filling the [citation needed] tag with some references. References is always what I work for! Active only since 2010, however with more than 14,000 edits. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 06:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. User:Kondicherry: I edit BLPs and cities/states articles, sometimes references, finding references is difficult sometimes, this will help.
    I'd vouch for Kondicherry. Excellent editor from what I've seen. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. User:Sabbut: User since 2003, over 70,000 edits globally, almost all of them in Spanish Wikipedia. Most of my work is maintenance and cleanup, but from time to time I also create articles on mathematics, politics and other subjects. Sabbut (talk) 10:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. User:BengaliHindu: User since 2009, with nearly 3,000 edits and 80+ articles. -- BengaliHindu (talk) 11:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. User:PageantUpdate: Editor since 2006, well over 1000 edits, focussing mainly on beauty pageants. Not as active as I used to be but that's because I left uni & loss access to good research sites! Used to spend hours citing articles, would be nice to get back in the groove. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 12:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. User:Alpertron Editor since 2006, 11600+ edits in Spanish Wikipedia, I have written 4 AD and 2 GA from scratch. Alpertron (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. User:Black Kite Editor since 2006, 40000 edits, apart from creating content Highbeam is useful for finding sources relating to deletion issues in which I am active. Black Kite (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. User:Ulisse0 Long time wikipedian on it.wiki with many edits. --Ulisse0 (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  95. User:Dumelow - Editor since 2006, 14,000 or so edits. Active in article creation, mainly on military and engineering history - Dumelow (talk) 20:45, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. User:Raulshc - User since 2008 on eswiki, 8000+ edits in several wikimedia projects. Mostly of my work is related with mathematics and natural sciences. --Raulshc (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. User:SMcCandlish – On enwiki, over 6 years and 70K+ edits (25K+ mainspace). I edit principally historical/archaeological, anthropological/linguistics and zoological articles, so better journal access would be a huge boon. It's ongoing work. I write articles like William A. Spinks (historical sports research), and work on major articles like Albinism, felinology articles, etc., continually. I intend to do some major improvement to History of sport and Manx cat very soon (I've spent over $200 on research materials for the latter alone). I had access to journal archives and such through UNM until 2010, but no longer have access as an alumnus. PS: I actually waited until 16 April UTC. :-) — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 00:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. User:Chefallen - active since 2009, cuisine and food-related, Jewish history and religion. I would like to do a lot more research and update articles in these areas. --Chefallen (talk) 00:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Rosiestep (talk) 02:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC). Editor since 2007, sysop since 2009, OA since 2011, inaugural Teahouse host 2012. Over 400 DYK? entries; over 54,000 edits mainly in the areas of history, anthropology, geography. Thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. User:WLRoss – Active on the English Wikipedia since 2006, 10,000+ edits. Created 14 articles. Primarily active in historical, military and Indigenous topics. Also active in BLPs and crime. Wayne (talk) 02:22, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Esceptic0 | ✉ ✍. 03:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC) Active on the spanish wikipedia and wikiquote, mainly. with apparently only 778 edits[reply]
  102. Critican.kane - since January 2011, active in german wikipedia (→ Critican.kane) with over 550 writen articles (no stubs, real articles), over 9,5k edits (over 85% article edits) - writen 4 little stubs in eng wikipedia (and over 300 edits) - over 1k edits in 98 wikiprojects (and 17 other stubs for Isidore Mankofsky :)); I intend to write Film articles, about american tv films and movies (also actors, directors, film editors, screewriters, producers and composers) -- Critican.kane (talk) 06:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC) -- Critican.kane (talk) 04:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Gaurav Pruthi - 1,800+ Edits , active since April 6th , 2011 , interested in Space Flight and history articles and have created a dozen of articles related to Satellites Click to See, craving for more. Gaurav Pruthi 06:59, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. User:AlanM1 - Editor since 2008-01-08. Only around 400 edits, but more active lately, and would like to be more active, still. I would be able to improve the quality of medical articles especially with cites from better-respected sources. — AlanM1 (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC) - I would use access for content creation and fact checking. I write in multiple content areas, including history, geography and others. Editor for several years over 6000 edits. Thanks. Alanscottwalker (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  106. ItsZippy - account since August 2009, admin since April 2012. Active in writing articles about philosophy and theology, which often require access to (sometimes difficult to access) academic work. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  107. User:Buster7 Editor since 04/08. 20000 edits. Have sandboxes filled with potential articles in need of fact checking. Thank you. ```Buster Seven Talk 16:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  108. User:Thehelpfulone. I've been around forever (well not really, but November 2007 is still quite a while!). 24k edits on English Wikipedia, active on Meta and various cross wiki work too. I'd like to increase my editing of articles and adding references/sources. Oh, and I've been a member of the cabal since November 2008. The Helpful One 18:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  109. User:Maclean25. Account created in ~2005, I have several thousand edits, and usually work on content creation. I'm willing to see what they have to offer. —maclean (talk) 19:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. User:Dsvyas. Primarily active on Gujarati Wikipedia since end of 2007 and have 10K+ edits. Also active on gu.wikisource (sysop on both, wiki as well as source). Mostly do content verification on gu.wiki, for which this access will help me greatly. DhavalTalk 20:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. User:Dweller. I thought I'd already requested this! Admin/crat/oversighter, account since 2005, c.40K edits. I think of myself primarily as a content contributer. Most of my work is on sport, but I spend a fair bit of time on BLP problems, wearing my oversighter hat. I have a bunch of featured material to my name and this would really help build on that. --Dweller (talk) 20:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. User:Fuhghettaboutit. Many thousands of edits; have been here since 2005; often do research for articles started by others and have written a number of featured and good articles.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:15, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. User:Keith D. Editor since September 2006, 127,000 edits. Mainly would use for verification work on English Wikipedia, though content expansion would be aided with access to sources. Keith D (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. User:EricSerge. Editor on English Wikipedia since 2007 but most active since 2009. Would utilize for verification work, expanding stubs, and utilize during the course of new content generation. EricSerge (talk) 01:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. User:Gaijin. Active on Spanish Wikipedia since 2005. More than 1000 articles written. Gaijin (talk) 04:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Seraphimblade Talk to me Active on Wikipedia mostly with some work on Commons. Will be quite helpful, especially since I no longer have my previous college access. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. User:RajeshPandey I am active on Nepali Wikipedia, ne:user:RajeshPandey, [meta.wikimedia.org] , I am active since 2006. I translate from English and Hindi to Nepali Nepal, I have about 6000+ edits. -RajeshPandey (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. User:Apwoolrich Active since 2004 mainly writing pages on the history and biography of Industrial Revolution technology. 1500+edits. Apwoolrich (talk) 09:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. User:Magalhães Active since 2005, with 60,000+ edits, mainly on Dutch wikipedia. I wrote 3000+ aricles about Philippine-related subjects and would use a Highbeam account for verification purposes and research for writing many articles more. Magalhães (talk) 09:41, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  120. User:Neitram - Active since 2004, 10,000+ edits, mainly on German Wikipedia as a content creator and verificator. --Neitram (talk) 10:11, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  121. User:Cerebellum - Active since 2007 on English Wikipedia, 7,000 edits, 2 GAs and over 100 articles created. I focus on military history and Christianity, my current projects are First Gospel of John and NATO logistics in the Afghan War. --Cerebellum (talk) 11:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  122. User:Ron Ritzman. Editor since 2005. 70,000 edits. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. User:Przemub. Polish Wikipedia. I write articles about history of computer science. Often free sources in the Internet aren't available, so access to HighBeam Research will be very useful for me. Przemub (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  124. User:Vipera. Editor since march 2006 on it.wiki, administrator since september 2009. I'm not focused on a main subject but i can say that my favourite fields are geography and history. --Vipera (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  125. User:Fr33kman Over 3000 edits to enwiki, global steward, editor on simplewiki. fr33kman 22:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  126. User:Malleus Fatuorum. Registered since 2006, more than 125,000 edits, over 30 FAs, and about 100 articles created from scratch. Malleus Fatuorum 23:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. User:Pap3rinik: user on Italian Wikipedia since 2005, sysop since 2006, 18k+ edits there. Mostly active in retro-patrolling, cleanup and verification activities on BLPs and other fields --Pap3rinik (talk) 07:50, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. User:Ganesh Paudel: user on Nepali Wikipedia since 2007, sysop since 2010, Bureaucrat since 2011, 12,000+ edits, above 1,000 articles created. Mostly active in New articles creating, retro-patrolling, cleanup and verification activities and other Bureaucratic activities. --Ganesh Paudel (talk) 08:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  129. User:Indian Chronicles : User since June 2006. 7000+ edits. Mostly interested in philosophy, religion and history related articles.--Indian Chronicles (talk) 08:52, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  130. User:Schlesinger: User since 2006 in de:wp, there about 20000 edits, interested in geography, geology and alpinism. --Schlesinger (talk) 09:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. User:Jenova20 - Editor for over a year and with 3000 edits. I like to work on LGBT and media themed stuff. Thanks Jenova20 10:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. User:Nbauman Over 4,000 edits since 2006. Write mostly about medicine. --Nbauman (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. User:Harkey Lodger Editor since 2006. I have made around 9,000 edits, mostly to geography, history and geology articles.--Harkey (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. User:Ariconte Editor since 2004 (under retired user name) since 2008 under Ariconte. Mostly fact checking and article enhancement. Recent articles would be a boon. 4000+ edits. Ariconte (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. User:Glane23 Editor since 2008. 39,000+ edits on enWiki, mostly cleanup, verification, addition of references to articles across the encyclopedia. Geoff Who, me? 22:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. User:Grandmaster. Editor since 2005. 18,743 edits on enWiki, mostly politics, culture and history. Grandmaster 22:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. User:Kevin Myers. I've been writing, creating, reviewing, and correcting history articles on the English Wikipedia since 2004, including Featured and Good articles. A HighBeam account would be a real boon. Thanks! —Kevin Myers 00:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. User:Bahudhara. Editor since 2010, 1,300 edits, mostly gnomish, but would like to contribute in more substantial way. Main interests: environment, geoscience, Australian biota, geography, history. I currently have no access to online academic resources, but am hopeful of initiating a GLAM project with local institutions. Bahudhara (talk) 00:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. User:Crisco 1492. Editor since 2005, 30k+ edits. 250-ish articles created, 1 FA and numerous GAs. Expect to use Highbeam for research on Indonesian subjects, where possible. I also tinker with Canadian and US subjects occasionally, so this may be useful. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. User:Cardamon. Editor since August 2006. 2170 edits. About 17 articles created. Also add refs to existing articles. Cardamon (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. User:Dsp13. Not sure if I'm in time for this round. Editor since 2006, 50K edits, 600 or so articles created. Mostly write on history and other humanities subjects - and have often encountered potentially useful HighBeam material before.Dsp13 (talk) 09:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. User:Jackhynes. Editor since 2004, 6000+ edits, mostly to primate- and biology-related articles. Since leaving university, haven't had access to many scientific journals which my editing has suffered for. Jack (talk) 10:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. user:Thesteve. I've been editing wikipedia since 2002, and have well over 2000 edits. I rescue a fair number of articles, and an additional source of sources would be great. Lately I've been translating German articles that don't exist here, and they tend to need references.  The Steve  10:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. User:jeh. Seven years, only about 5000 edits, but I do try to reference things. Editing mostly in areas of older computer and electronics tech. Jeh (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. User:StAnselm. Five years, 47,000 edits, hundreds of new articles. This would be a big help. StAnselm (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. User:WaitingForConnection. Joined in September 2009, 13,000 edits to en.wiki. Primarily involved with football articles, and having dealt with a fair bit of link rot of otherwise excellent citations, I feel Highbeam will be useful in that regard. I also believe it would be a great asset on List of diets, which I intend to return to at some stage. —WFC— 23:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. User:Antonorsi. Barely a year, about +13,000 edits on Spanish Wikipedia. Editing mostly in areas about economics, references will help a lot. Antonorsi (talk) 01:58, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. User:Lambiam. Registered since 2006; 38,000 edits across projects, mostly on the English Wikipedia. Topics are all over the place, but I'm regularly frustrated because all relevant news sources I can find are behind a paywall.  --Lambiam 03:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. User:Kauffner 30,000 edits. Kauffner (talk) 09:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. User:Dipankan001 I also helped in promoting the news. This will be very easy and so that I can always cite HighBeam as a permanent resource. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 11:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. User:Toddst1 One of the 350 most active Wikipedians of all time and 25 most active administrators. Otherwise, quite the slacker. Toddst1 (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. User:Mabeenot. Editor since 2009 with 5,000 edits. I've worked on articles about historical publications, music recordings, railroads, and defunct educational institutions which could benefit from access to HighBeam's archives. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. User:Noopur28 Editor since 2011, 1,100+ edits, GLAM volunteer. Would really appreciate a Highbeam account because I specialize in Indian art and crafts and not many books, archives are available publicly even to read or glance thru. Thanks! Noopur28 (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Just pointing out that user has mostly small edits and bot like assessments, and registered in December 2011, which is as good as 2012. --122.179.37.223 (talk) 14:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. User:DBigXray. Editor since 2011 with more than 14,000 edits-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 22:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. User:Softlavender. English Wikipedia. Since 2007; 15,000 edits. I specialize in in-depth research, particularly via the internet, since I live in a remote area (Pacific island) with no decent library source. Special focus on biography, history, classical music, and the arts, especially the performing arts. Softlavender (talk) 03:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. User:Spartaz Editor since 2007 over 25,000 edits and very active at AFD where access to this would be extremely useful. Spartaz Humbug! 07:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. User:220 of Borg. Editing since September 11, 2009. However, only with a registered account since November 11, 2011 (2,116 edits). 11,912 edits as a static IP, and I believe Admin user:HJ Mitchell will vouch for my IP 'identity'. I wander around WP helping out in a wide variety of areas: updating articles(particularly BLPs), new page patrol, vandal fighting, welcoming new users. One area I used to do a lot was 'fixing' bare URLS and adding data to refs. I often came across High Beam and regretted that I couldnt afford an account with them. Please consider! - 220 of Borg 09:03, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. User:Smalljim. English Wikipedia. These are my more significant content contributions; I plan to continue working in similar areas, particularly those related to Devon & Cornwall. Access to current newspapers and magazines would also be useful in determining notability of borderline topics, where I also do some work: (WP:CSD, WP:AfD). Admin, over 29,000 edits, active since 2007.  —SMALLJIM  09:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. User:SP-KP. English Wikipedia. Editor for 5 years+, 30000+ edits. Active seeker-out-and-adder-of references to articles within scope of WP:BIRD amongst other things. SP-KP (talk) 11:23, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. User:Sodabottle Editor since 2009. 15,000 edits in en wiki and 50,000 in Tamil wikipedia (am an admin there). I create and expand WP India related articles.--Sodabottle (talk) 13:36, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. User:Ravichandar84 editor since September 2006 with over 42000 edits. I contribute mainly on history and culture of South India and use Google Books, archive.org and Project Gutenberg a lot. A Highbeam account might be of great advantage to me as some very useful books are not freely accessible on the internet.-RaviMy Tea Kadai 13:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. User:fedaro editor since february 2006 with over 1200 edits. I have mainly contributed photos in Commons, but I am determined to contribute more in terms of items.--Fedaro (talk) 20:54, 21 April 2012 (UTC) -[reply]
  163. User:Michael Hardy. English Wikipedia. A small number of edits to German Wikipedia and even one or two to French and Italian Wikipedias. More than 160,000 edits, beginning in 2002. Hundreds of new articles created. I will continued to edit English Wikipedia daily and sometimes create new articles. Michael Hardy (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  164. User:Krishnaprasaths Editor since 2011. 1,138 edits in Tamil wikipedia. I create and expand WP India related and sports articles. --krishna talk 05:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  165. User:Salix alba editor since 2005 with 15,000 edits mainly in mathematics where I occasionally come across journal articles it would be helpful to access. --Salix (talk): 06:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166. User:Srithern Most @ Tamil Wikipedia Since 2009 with total edit-count: 3,017. --Srither (talk) 10:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. User:GreatOrangePumpkin, mainly editing in enwiki since 2009; 20,825 edits; mainly working on music-related articles.--GoPTCN 10:30, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. User:Malick78. Active on Wikipedia in English, Polish and Russian since 2007. Have created over 120 articles in English and made thousands of edits. I edit on a wide variety of subjects and am sure I'd find your service useful. Malick78 (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  169. User:Surya Prakash.S.A. Administrator in Tamil Wikipedia. Having File mover rights in Commons. Member in OTRS too. In Wikipedia Since 2010. -- SuryaPrakash  Talk... 12:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  170. User:RolandR Editor since December 2005, with 16,000+ edits. Particularly active in Middle East and politics articles; I frequently check and add references and citations, so would find this very useful. RolandR (talk) 18:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. User:House Editor in the spanish Wikidia since April 2007, with 6300+ edits. --House (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  172. User:Magnum2008 Editor on it.wiki since 2008, with more than 1900 edits, most on history and military subjects --Magnum2008 (talk) 08:51, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. User:The wub editor for 7 years, over 70,000 edits. Would mainly find it useful for referencing and rescuing articles from deletion. the wub "?!" 13:04, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. User:Dkriegls. Editor on English Wikipedia for 5 1/2 years, 15,000+ edits). I mostly work on biographies and cleaning up notable people. Would use source to find references for verification of notable people without biography pages and thus create their biography page.
  175. User:Mr little irish. I am short of the 1000 edits requirement, however I would like to start working on my content creation/addition work to broaden my horizons. MrLittleIrish (talk) © 13:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  176. user:shanmugamp7 4000 edits in Tamil wikipedia... mostly i create or expand India related articles in Tamil Wikipedia--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:28, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Round 3, open period, delivered weekly

Sorry for the delay on these. They'll be out by the week of Monday the 21st.

  1. user:Mizzou415 Editor for over 6 years with over 1500 edits. I mostly create and expand articles on college athletics and intend to continue to do so. - Mizzou415 (talk) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. user:KSRolph Contributing and editing with a login just over a year, quite a number of edits, but especially helping students learn to contribute and continue to do so. I've brought in about 80 females, in an effort to improve the gender gap (keeping them going is another matter). I'm a anthropological linguist, and social science researcher, and would like to improve citation quality on many pages, especially where language, culture, religion, identity, and cultural geography are concerned. Thank you, KSRolph (talk) 05:35, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:GSorby Starting editing in January 2010, have over 7000 edits and I focus mostly on television programme articles and fictional characters including actors and actresses. I have also promoted a few articles to GA, two of which I created. I have also created a variety of pages (see Created section on my userpage). GeorgePing! 09:39, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:WilliamJE I have been on Wikipedia for over six years but most of my editing has been done over the last three. What I edit is mostly Golf, Aviation crashes, Politics , Actors, to name a few. I do alot of fact checking....William 20:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. es:User:GermanX. I have been on Wikipedia since 2005 with over 22000 edits. Usually I translate articles from English Wikipedia to Spanish Wikipedia. I have write or modified articles when necessary. I mostly work on information technology articles. GermanX (talk) 07:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. es:User:Héctor Guido Calvo Editor for over 4 years with over 14900 edits. I mostly create and expand articles on History and Cinema and intend to continue to do so. --Héctor Guido Calvo (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Rangilo_Gujarati Started in February 2011. I edit English and Gujarati (gu) Wikipedia, also contribute images and other media files to Commons. Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Wikipelli - Editor for 2+ years, 60,000+ edits, 16 articles, 2 GAs. I expand articles of all kinds, like to ref BLPs and other bios, Historic Places. I work with new editors who are interested in starting and developing articles. Wikipelli Talk 22:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:SL93 I have been editing since 2008 as Schuym1 (this is my second account which has previously been approved by the community) and on this account, I have over 20,000 edits. I create articles and expand articles on a variety of subjects. I don't stick to one area, but I normally focus on media such as books and films. SL93 (talk) 00:51, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Ryan Vesey I have been editing since February 2011 with over 8000 edits. My primary contributions vary widely, from anti-vandalism and new page patrol to content creation. I believe a highbeam account would be the most useful in taking part in AFD discussions. I haven't been entirely active in that region lately, but will certainly increase my involvement when finals are done in 3 days. Ryan Vesey Review me! 13:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. pl:user:Plushy - Seasoned editor, admin on pl.wiki. I think that highbeam could be useful when finding reliable sources for some articles, I'll at least try to use it.Plushy (talk) 16:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. SkyBon >5000 edits on all accounts ([8] [9] [10]). Active Wikipedian since 2006. I participate in checking and verifying content, finding sources therefore I think HighBeam would be useful for me. SkyBon (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:Bgwhite 140,000 edits mostly over 2 1/2 years. I look at new biographies for references, copy editing and the like. Bgwhite (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Drhoehl Editor for several years; 1800 edits +/-. I'm active in classical music and opera (member of both Wikiprojects) and do occasional cleanup work in articles about military history weapons. Drhoehl (talk
  15. User:Gen. Quon. Wikipedia:WikiProject The Office (US), Wikipedia:WikiProject The X-Files. I have been an active editor for over four years, but I have focused on the last couple of years on getting articles, most notably television episodes, up to good article status. I have a definite intention to continue on this work, specifically in raising many The X-Files and The Office articles up to good article status.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Vmenkov I have been contributing since 2006; 17,000 edits on en.wiki, 50,000 total over all Wikimedia projects. HighBeam would be a useful addition to Google Books and JSTOR. -- Vmenkov (talk) 04:54, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. User:WilliamThweatt Been editing WP since 2005. I'm active in editing/creating/expanding language articles and articles relating to Southeast Asia. I also often check and/or provide sources/citations for existing articles. This tool would be invaluable to me as many articles that I work on are relatively obscure and free online research material is hard to find. Thank You--William Thweatt Talk | Contribs 06:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. User:Yunshui I'm active on the English Wikipedia, with about 10,000 edits. I expend a fair number of those adding sources to undersourced articles (with no particular pattern or area of interest); when GoogleNews doesn't cut it, HighBeam would be a valuable resource. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. User:Strike Eagle Over 2400 edits in all wikis.I'm mostly active in editing Military related articles of India and others.StrikeEagle ✈ 08:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. User:Y2kcrazyjoker4 Active editor since 2006, over 35,000 edits within English Wikipedia, have gotten 3 articles to Featured Article status. I spend most of my time in the music and sports article space, and will aim to continue to do the same. Having a HighBeam account would definitely help me with geting a few articles that are on the GA/FA threshold promoted. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 15:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User:Harrias. Work primarily within WP:WikiProject Cricket, but also stray off into other areas. I've worked on one featured article, eighteen featured lists and eighteen good articles, generally biographies. Highbeam would be an invaluable resource, particularly for archived resources. Harrias talk 22:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. User:Zad68. Account since 2008, active in English Wikipedia, over 4,000 edits now. I've been getting into medical articles and am interested in adding content for biology articles. The timing on this offer couldn't be better matched to my current need for it. Zad68 (talk) 23:42, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. User:Hispalois. Mainly Spanish Wikipedia with occasional contributions in English and French wikipedias. Active since 2006, I have written articles about many different subjects: history, science, technology, biographies... Several of them were ranked GA or FA. I plan to keep on doing the same, and any additional source material is welcome.
  24. User:Moswento. I create articles on a variety of topics, including a number of recent DYK contributions. HighBeam would be invaluable as another source to draw on. Moswento talky 08:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. User:TransporterMan. Account since 2007, over 10,000 edits. I mainly do dispute resolution at WP:3O (where I'm the third most active contributor), at WP:DRN (where I'm the second most active contributor), and at WP:MEDCAB (where I'm one of the coordinators). HighBeam access would be useful in helping to solve disputes involving the reliability of sourcing by being able to look up sources being offered by the disputants and disputes involving absent or inadequate sourcing. Thanks, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Panyd - User since 2007 with a long history of sourcing BLPs where possible. Also prolific in expanding articles for Wikiproject Paranormal. Highbeam would help greatly in both of these endeavours as well as with the occasional disputed DYK. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. User:Ruhrfisch - major contributor to 28 FAs and 4 FLs, over 45,000 edits, admin. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:16, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:Finetooth - About 53,000 edits since 2007. Major contributor to 15 FAs, 2 FLs, more than 800 peer reviews. Finetooth (talk) 17:12, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Andrew Gray (talk) - User since 2004, 17 GAs and ~38,000 edits; newspaper access would be particularly useful. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Dan arndt (talk) - Editor for 5 and a half years, with over 21,000 edits. Major contributor to 5 FAs and 3FLs and numerous DYKs. Mainly Australian related articles (music, architecture, history, arts etc) - constiently finding references in HighBeam which I'm unable to access - would assist in better referencing of Wikipedia articles in the future. Dan arndt (talk) 04:14, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Matthewedwards (talk) Been an editor since 2007 and have 7362 (40.03%) edits to article space. Heavily contributed to 5 FAs, 20 FLs, and a number of other GAs, also carry out sporadic reviews at GAN and FLC. Having Highbeam access would allow me to provide better sources for the articles I write, primarily TV shows, niche sports, and local topics. Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 06:16, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Moeng - Editor since 2006, with 20.000+ edits, mainly on Danish Wikipedia and Commons - --Moeng (talk) 19:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:Ericoides. 15,000+ edits since 2006. Over 180 new articles created, some basic, some not at all bad. Would be a useful resource for more new articles. Thanks Ericoides (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:NTox. English Wikipedia. Currently working on a comprehensive FA with emphasis on scholarship. Plan to continue with featured/content work in the future. NTox · talk 02:15, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. User:Skater 5 DYK articles and working on my first GA. Around 6500 edits would love to have the extra search.--SKATER Is Back 05:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Keristrasza. Active mainly with Wikipedia:WikiProject British crime. Over 2k edits. My usual MO is to create or significantly expand articles eg Murder of Teresa de Simone (GA), Death of Christopher Alder, Murder of Lynette White and Murder of Suzanne Capper (GA). Very often come across sources for these type of articles on HighBeam that I would like to have used were I an account holder. Keristrasza (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:trialsanderrors en.wiki admin, currently mostly interested in creating articles in conjunction with the Library of Congress and their Bain News Service images on Flickr. ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. User:Wiki Raja Editor for over 5 years with over 14,109 edits. I mostly create and expand articles and WikiProjects on cultures from South Asia and other areas. Wiki Raja த
  39. User:Kashmiri: Since 2006, over 1,000 edits to-date, mainly on English and Polish Wikis. Key contributions: medicine - neurodegenerative conditions (articles: spinal muscular atrophy, hereditary motor neuropathies, etc.), disease classification, adding/improving references; regional studies (Central and South Asia - culture and politics). Access to HighBeam would enable better referencing of medicine-related articles – many thanks! kashmiri (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Stevertigo: Editor since 2002, ~50K edits over various Wikimedia projects (including IP edits), original Mediation committee member, active in content generation, research, dispute resolution. -Stevertigo (t | c) 22:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. User:Smerus: Editor for over 6 years, with several thousand edits on English Wikipedia. Creation and editing of articles mainly related to music, literature, history and countries of the former Soviet Union.--Smerus (talk) 09:40, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Nishidani. 6 years editing, 25,000 edits. See my user page for contributions to article construction. My editing principle is, except where impossible, only use RS that come from academia, or major publishing houses, in book form or articles. I'm "retired" until my ban expires, or I do, early next month. Nishidani (talk) 13:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:Vensatry: Editor since 2010, with close to 18,000 edits, mainly on English Wikipedia and Commons. Have written 15 DYKs and significantly contributed to four GAs and one FL. Highbeam would be helpful for archived materials. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:OhanaUnited - Admin here and bureaucrat at Wikispecies. 18,000+ edits in 6 years. Written 6 featured contents, 8 GAs, and 3 DYKs. OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

<--! AFTER #45... Please apply in round 4 below. Thanks!-->

Round 4: Delivery in late July

  1. user:72Dino Editor since 2006 with over 21,000 edits. Most of my work is adding content and references in a variety of areas. Would love to have additional resources. 72Dino (talk) 05:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Targaryen (formerly SpeakFree). I am a Wikipedia editor with over 18,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, most of them in article space where I created about 200 articles, 5 of which were DYKs and one of which is a GA. I have been registered with this account since September 2010 (before that I edited anonymously and with some other accounts since 2006; these are now long inactive). I also wrote over a hundred articles on the Dutch Wikipedia. Having access to an extensive archive will be very useful in my endeavours. Targaryenspeak or forever remain silent 22:26, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Gatoclass. Editor for six years, admin for four, about 60,000 edits and 300+ articles. Current focus is on maritime, industrial and military history, but I enjoy reading and writing about history in general, and indeed have an interest in most topics. Gatoclass (talk) 15:13, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:William S. Saturn. English Wikipedia since 2007, English Wikinews since 2008. Over 10,00 edits, one FA, several GAs on topics such as U.S. presidential election campaigns, Texas cities and geography, and biographies. I plan to continue that focus in future research.--William S. Saturn (talk) 21:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:No More Mr Nice Guy. English Wikipedia since late 2008. 4500+ edits. I edit mostly topics relating to the Middle East. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:AndrewN English WP since 2010. Active in IRC help channel. Would be nice to have one. AndrewN talk 18:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Trevj. English Wikipedia. Active for 3 years, initially joined 2004. Member WikiProject Computing, WikiProject Bristol. Mainly editing science/technology/business topics, also some local history, current affairs, and anything else which takes my fancy. Generally use citation templates. Currently 3202 article space edits (40.77%), creator of 42 articles. Unaware of free online access to HighBeam at or through nearest library, although it operates restricted opening hours anyway (23 hours per week) eliminating this as a useful alternative. -- Trevj (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Leech44. English WP since 2010. 11,000+ edits, with recognized content between FL, GA, and DYK, mostly on ice hockey related topics. I prefer to work on older players/events that don't have the wealth of online sources that their current counterparts do. The majority of my editing time comes during breaks at work so while I don't think I have access at my local library it does little good if I am incorrect. Having access to all of the archived information could be extremely useful.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 21:22, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Hobbes Goodyear. English Wikipedia. 2+ years, 2,000 edits. Primary areas are lesser-known popular music from past 40 years and participation in WP:Articles for deletion discussions. In both areas, Google News frequently turns up useful references from Highbeam that I can't currently access. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Guy Macon. 6 years+, 6,000 edits+. Volunteer Mediator at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, which involves a lot of citation checking. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. I focus on GA quality articles and access to Highbeam s very crucial in creating such articles. Currently I get access through friends but it would be very convenient for me to have access directly so that I can do my own research without troubling my friends. Kanatonian (talk) 21:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Sp33dyphil. Have accumulated over 30,000 edits in 2 and a half years. I'm most competent with aviation, and military, articles. HighBeam would help me access archived aviation articles. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 10:50, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Would make a useful supplement to JSTOR, most definitely. ResMar 20:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. English Wikipedia, editor since November 2007 with over 15,000 edits. I tend to create articles on whatever doesn't exist, takes my fancy, I often expand/improve historical and political articles. I'd like to continue doing the work I currently do, this would be a great resource in addition to Credo Reference. —James (Talk • Contribs) • 8:00pm • 10:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Astronomyinertia. Editor since 2009, with nearly 4000 edits. I have started 70 articles including 7 DYKs. Interested in South Asia-related topics. ASTRONOMYINERTIA (TALK) 18:08, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Designate. I've been around for a while and I'm interested in this. —Designate (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. I'm starting to believe that I need that access: within a week I had to ask somebody in IRC three times to check something for me. And I don't believe that this situation will change. mabdul 09:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Could use it, I think. Gigs (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. User:Lexein. English Wikipedia since 2006, >9k edits, 12 new articles, expanded >8 to DYK eligibility, broad range of article areas. I regularly expand references and rescue dead links; Highbeam access would help here. --Lexein (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. User:Smarojit. I have been an editor at the English Wikipedia since the past year with over 1700 edits. I have significantly contributed to four Good articles and intend to continue working on many more. For that I need access to several newspaper articles, which is extremely hard to get. Smarojit (talk) 11:02, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Long-term editor with nearly 50,000 edits, 85% in article space. Will use account for BLP verification and when resuming my personal project of adding critical reception sections (typically sourced from newspaper/magazine reviews) to book articles that are now mostly plot summaries. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:25, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. User:BPositive: Around 2k edits on Wikipedia. Co-ordinator of the WikiProject WP:INCOTM. Would be useful for some research work on this project. BPositive (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Dawnseeker2000. Active with WikiProject Earthquakes. Very active with constructing articles for old events and some new. Have been an active WP editor for a few years with 30,000 article space edits & expect to continue to add content with my main sources being the Los Angeles Times archives (they go back to 1881 via ProQuest) and research articles from Science and the bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. This opportunity would make another great source for articles. I am a DYK contributor and a few examples of these articles are 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake, 1663 Charlevoix earthquake, and 1932 Jalisco earthquake. Dawnseeker2000 21:56, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. User:Thibbs. Active on English Wikipedia since 2006 with over 10k edits, and a member of the reference library projects for multiple WikiProjects. I have recently become involved in the RS-location for WikiProject Video Games, and I think this would be helpful for verification purposes as well as for research. I am specifically interested in expanding Wikipedia's coverage of early 1990s video games. Thibbs (talk) 04:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. User:Dismas. Active on English Wikipedia since 2003 Has it really been that long!! with 61k total edits. 72% in article space. I bounce around as far as subject areas go and thus am not a formal member of any WikiProjects but I do frequent the Help Desk. When editors post there with requests for help adding refs or cleaning up articles, I try to get the article enough references to pass WP:GNG at least. Dismas|(talk) 07:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Animeshkulkarni: Active on English Wikipedia since 2011 I am little short of 10K edits. I am active on WikiProject India with mostly in it's cinema task force. I plan to use this account to search information related to these projects, that is old to early 20th century or so which is not easily available through normal means. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. User:Torreslfchero: Active on wikipedia since 2010 with over 6000 edits. I am mostly active articles related to Bollywood and also a member of WikiProject India and also Indian cinema task force. I have also created film articles and for most of the articles its quite hard to find sources. Torreslfchero (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:Theirrulez: Editor since 2006, I have a global account with more than 1,900 edits on en.wiki, more than 10,000 on it.wiki, active on French and Spanish wikis too. I'm mostly active on military history, geography, architecture and civil engineering. --Theirrulez (talk) 05:44, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User:Gungadin: Active on this account since Feb 2006 but was I have been editing since 2005 on an ip account. I have been a heavey contributer to TV related articles, including fictional characters and actors with 24,480 edits, and I would benefit greatly in editing by having access to Highbeam's archive.GunGagdinMoan 19:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. User:Tyrol5: Active on English Wikipedia since late 2008, during which time I've made just over 16,000 edits. I've written several GA's, mostly about human spaceflight and U.S. politics. HighBeam's archive looks to be an interesting resource and would certainly prove useful in providing context for a multitude of topics during the article creation process. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. User:Bollyjeff: Editor for 2 years, with over 10,000 edits, mainly on English Wikipedia. I have been the major contributor on four GAs. Highbeam would be very helpful for sourcing articles on older subjects, before the internet age. BollyJeff | talk 17:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Warofdreams. Editor since 2003, admin and bureaucrat since 2004, with more than 70,000 edits to the English Wikipedia, and a small number elsewhere. At present, I principally write about two areas: politics, and roller derby. I have largely exhausted the freely available sources in my primary areas of interest, and would use the access to add additional information, and additional/stronger references to articles. Warofdreams talk 07:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:GrapedApe 3+ year editor on en.wiki; +19k edits; creator of 290 articles; 4 Featured Lists; 5 Good articles; 15 DYks; Primarily editing college and university articles and sites of the National Register of Historic Places. Have exhausted google and googlenews archives, would love to try new database.--GrapedApe (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:Morning277. I am an active editor with over 5,000 edits. I have created dozens of articles and also involved in Wikipedia projects Law, Michigan, Zoos, and Cleanup All Contributions Are Indexed Here. I am also a regular contributor with AfD which is why I am requesting the use of High Beam. I would like additional access to sources to see if certain pages meet notability or if they should be deleted. I will use the High Beam account for AfD and also when creating new articles (to ensure that I use the best source to support content). --Morning277 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. User:Martin1978 - German Wikipedia ~70000 (home wiki), frequently checking changes to articles on my watchlist, verifying and adding sources. Thanks! Regards, --Martin1978 (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Arms & Hearts. Been around on English Wikipedia since 2006 and properly active since late 2008, currently just shy of 10,000 live edits. I mostly patrol the unpatrolled backlog and try to expand articles I find there, as well as creating articles on various topics that interest me. I'm increasingly finding that Google News turns up results that would be useful references if only I had access to them. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 01:34, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Avicennasis. Active since early 2010, ~83,000 edits (mostly gnomish, but when I do add content I try to have tons of references.) Also somewhat active on IRC and with the WP:AFC project. Avicennasis @ 05:09, 15 Tamuz 5772 / 05:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. User:Gongshow. Editor since 2008 with ~20k edits, 3 GAs, and 17 DYKs. In my efforts to cite unsourced articles on notable topics - particularly those related to music, film and sports - having access to Highbeam's archive would be a tremendous asset.  Gongshow Talk 16:11, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. User:Mann_jess. Editor for over 3 years, and active the last 2. I contribute to many contentious topics (such as religion, medicine & science, etc) which often need high levels of high-quality sources. Google scholar is often great, as is PubMed, but this would be a fantastic addition for tracking down reliable sources. Thanks!   — Jess· Δ♥ 23:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Intoronto1125 Need access to older sport articles that have been archived. Thanks! Intoronto1125TalkContributions 23:44, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. User:Farrtj - I have been on Wikipedia for over 6 years and have over 10,000 edits to my name. I contribute to a number of articles, but am especially active on Wikiproject Beer, where I am the top contributor. I have produced 8 good articles this year, with several more in the pipeline. I would like access to HighBeam in order to get access to content to contribute to Wikipedia. 20:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Mailer diablo 27 DYKs, 1 GA, 3 FAs, over 50k edits since 2004. Would like to have a go at article writing again, and having access to a reference will be very useful to me. - Mailer Diablo 05:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. User:TheSoundAndTheFury Edited Wikipedia since 2010, nearly 3k edits. I write on contemporary China, finance, and other topics - sometimes contentious. Would be wonderful to have access to this source of information and really help the work I do here. TheSoundAndTheFury (talk) 20:35, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. User:Nemonoman Edited Wikipedia since 2005, more than 6000 edits. A major contributor to Good Articles Taj Mahal and Meher Baba, recently became a major contributor to Roller Derby which I hope to make a Good Article. I am particularly interested in Highbeam resources for recent news references about Meher Baba, and news concerning the controversy of Sufism Reoriented with local planning groups in Contra Costa county.--Nemonoman (talk) 14:14, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:Ruby2010 Edited Wikipedia since late 2008, with 3 FAs, 7 FLs, and 80+ GAs. Plan to add more content to episodes of The Office and Fringe as well as the season premiere of Rome. Ruby 2010/2013 04:57, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. User:Pgallert. >8,000 edits on en since 2008. I write about history and geography of Namibia, see here. --Pgallert (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No more in round 4 please. Please apply in round 5 below.

Round 5, delivered late August

  1. soosim (talk · contribs) - ditto
  2. User:stephenwanjau. >3000 edits on English Wikipedia. I write about Kenya and Africa at large. I intend to continue this work, specifically writing about topics related to art, literature, cinema, poetry, culture and knowledge Uwanja Talk to Me. Email Me. 03:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Rajasekhar1961: I have more than 30,000 edits in English Wikipedia and 50,000 edits in Telugu Wikipedia. I wrote mostly about Indian cinema, biographies, culture and biology related articles. I think the HighBeam is very useful for my wikipedia related work. Thank you.Dr. Rajasekhar A. 09:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:AgadaUrbanit Editor since 2008 with over 7,500 edits. I am adding content and references in a variety of areas. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 23:56, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Dreadstar, 50,000 edits on the English WP over 6 1/2 years. Highbeam has so many helpful references and content, I really saw its value when I was expanding an article recently, and one of the other editors used Highbeam references to great advantage! Dreadstar ☥ 05:11, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Spitzl, roughly 2,000 edits each on the English and German WP. I am adding content and references mostly in the field of economics (up until now) and philosophy (in the future) --spitzl (talk) 16:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. User:Ceradon I have been an active contributor for a while now. I've actively contributed to the creation and/or expansion of a number of articles. I have around 3200 edits. HighBeam will for sure be very helpful in my research and content work, as I'm planning on being more active over the coming weeks and months. --ceradon talkcontribs 02:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. User:Praveenp, Active in ml.wikipedia and Commons for 6 years. More than 10,000 edits in Malayalam Wikipedia and More than 3000 edits in Commons. Mainly contributing on Technology, Birds, History--Praveen:talk 04:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. CHUCAO: Editor in es:WP since July 2010. More than 22,000 edits. More than 300 articles. CHUCAO (talk) 21:29, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:FruitMonkey, Active in English WP since 2006 with around 45,000 edits. I mainly focus on Wales and Welsh related articles and Highbeam holds access to many local papers which I would find extremely helpful in accessing. FruitMonkey (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:Mohamed CJ, Active in English Wikipedia for just over a year with about 4,000 edits. I'm active in content creation of articles related to the Bahraini uprising. Getting access to more resources is definitely a good thing. Mohamed CJ (talk) 16:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    User:Fasttimes68, Active in English Wikipedia since 2007 with 1,500+ edits. Recently I've started researching regionally based businesses that have either expanded nationally, or have local cultural significance. Some of these businesses have either thrived, or have gone out of business entirely. I wish to use HighBeam to find sources which will allow me to add historical value to these (and other) articles. Fasttimes68 (talk) 15:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC) (Stricken, user is banned. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]
  12. SchroCat; active on English Wikipedia. Having put a number of Bond-related articles up to GA standard, I'm moving into other entertainment-related articles, bringing them up to GA level, with a very ocassional FA thrown in too. Registered editor since April 2011; 10k+ edits - SchroCat (^ • @) 15:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:secretlondon, Joined in 2003, 30,000+ edits. Researching Russia/USSR currently. I don't have access to this elsewhere. Secretlondon (talk) 20:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. User:Boson --Boson (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Dementia13. Active on English Wikipedia for several years. Have made thousands of edits, written several GAs, and edited others' articles to FA status. Member of several WikiProjects and the Guild of Copy Editors, and in the inquiry stages of forming a WikiProject dedicated to MIDI technology. Dementia13 (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. User:Enric Naval +25,000 edits on English wikipedia over several years. I edit several kinds of articles. Many times I need access to old articles of regional newspapers. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. User:Peter cohen Number of edits in low five figures. I have created articles mainly related to opera and classical music but also one on psychology. Good and Featured content again falls mainly into classical music/opera but also mythology. I have exhausted my supply of programmes from first productions of operas and therefore need better online access to find good material.--Peter cohen (talk) 22:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Khazar2 (talk · contribs) Between my two accounts, I've made more than 60,000 edits in the past six years. I write extensively about human rights issues around the world, and access to archived newspapers and magazines would be invaluable. Khazar2 (talk) 02:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Diannaa (talk · contribs) I have made around 50,000 edits since 2009. Current editing interests are Nazi Germany and biographies of other historic figures. -- Dianna (talk) 04:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Ravenswing (talk · contribs · count) I have over 35,000 edits, and have been very active over the years in both AfD and article creation for hockey articles, both areas where access to old newspaper articles is vital. Ravenswing 05:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. ((user|LeadSongDog}} Over 24,000 edits, mostly in articlespace. Active in citegnoming and source verification on diverse topics.LeadSongDog come howl! 06:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. User:hchc2009 I have made around 26,000 edits in the last few years, primarily in content generation. A couple of test searches show items on history that would be useful on the HighBeam system. I don't have access to this elsewhere. Hchc2009 (talk) 06:44, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. User:Edgar181 I have made >100,000 edits and have been heavily involved in adding content related to chemistry and other science topics. I intend to continue adding such content. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. User:Hack I have been active for seven years - I tend to focus on creating articles on historical sports figures. I don't have access to this facility elsewhere. Hack (talk) 15:42, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. User:Toa Nidhiki05 Active almost exclusively on the English Wikipedia for almost four years with 7,000+ edits, primarily related to music (mainly Contemporary Christian, Christian rock, and rock articles), sports (American football), and politics. Toa Nidhiki05 17:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. User:Rlendog - Active for several years with 45,000+ edits. Topics include tree of life, music and math where access to HighBeam could be useful. Rlendog (talk) 20:58, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. GregJackP (GregJackP) - 11,000 edits, on Wikipedia since 2006. I mainly edit in legal fields, primarily SCOTUS cases involving Native American (Indian tribes). I also edit some in Military History, and I am a participant in WikiProject: Articles for Creation. This would be very valuable to me in all of these areas. GregJackP Boomer! 22:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. User:The Blade of the Northern Lights; most of my article writing centers around the Emishi and Ainu of Japan, Japan's pre-World War II underworld, and the history of Burma; none of said topics are easy to references for. Access to HighBeam would be tremendously helpful, for my personal interests but far more importantly for my article research. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. User:Dolfrog I have been actively editing for a number of years, over 7000 edits primarily with articles related to a wide range of invisible disabilities and the related medical research. HighBeam could help find more detailed information to support an articles content. dolfrog (talk) 10:39, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. User:MrX With more than 8000 edits on enwiki, I am active in creating and editing articles on a variety of subjects including history, historical biographies, science, geography, photography, civil rights and music. My biggest impediment to contributing more substantially is lack of access to good research material. MrX 01:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. User:Torchiest With almost 13,000 total edits now, I have written seven Good Articles, one of which is on the cusp of becoming a Featured Article. I do most of my work on music and video games from the 1990s, for which sources are skimpy, and I have seen a lot of potentially great sources on Highbeam that would be a big help. —Torchiest talkedits 21:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. User:Ant_ie ant_ie (talk) 09:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. User:Mattlore. Active on the English Wikipedia. Create and Expand rugby league and other sport articles, especially biographies as well as New Zealand history. Mattlore (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. User:GermanJoe reviewing, occasional work on history or country related articles (1.2K edits). Please skip my application, if spots get rare for more active members.
  35. User:NealeFamily Creating, editing, and reviewing articles about New Zealand and automobiles are my primary interest, but these take me into other areas from time to time, which makes access to a wide range of reference material very useful NealeFamily (talk) 09:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Gbawden Creating, reviewing and updating articles relating to South African military biographies mainly Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. User:Jokestress I have created over 1,800 redlinked articles on a wide range of topics, with a focus on biographies. Jokestress (talk) 10:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Sesamevoila (talk) 10:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC) I have mainly been editing biographies and histories but I want to get more into creating articles which would require greater access to sources[reply]
  39. User:Qwfp. English Wikipedia. Creating, editing and verifying articles on statistics, cycling, British settlements and people. Qwfp (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. User:Two Hearted River I write rock music and ice hockey articles, etc., and review featured article candidates and good article nominations. Two Hearted River (paddle / fish) 11:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. User:Struway2. 30,000+ edits on en:wiki. Active in creating, improving and verifying football-related articles, both biographical and historical. Access to regional newspapers not online elsewhere would be particularly useful. Struway2 (talk) 11:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. User:Siawase. I have over 9000 edits on English Wikipedia and have contributed to 3 GAs. I work mainly at improving/expanding contemporary popular culture articles (children's culture and entertainer biographies.) I intend to continue this work, and as I have run into Highbeam previously when looking for sources, an account would be very useful. Siawase (talk) 12:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Wildthing61476 (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Editor for 6 years, close to 10,000 edits, mainly work in vandalism cleanup however I would like a good tool to use for verification of material added to article, and improving existing articles on Baltimore-related topics.[reply]
  44. User:Rrius. Nearly 40k edits (nearly 30k in Article space). I have been working on creating and expanding articles related to UK Shadow Cabinets, including Labour Party Shadow Cabinet elections, Shadow Cabinets of each Leader of the Opposition, and holders of various shadow roles. I have done the same to a limited extent with Canada and Australia. On numerous occasions, I have run into inaccessible HighBeam information, so I know it would help.
  45. SilkTork (talk · contribs · count) Good Article writer and reviewer. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Dr.K. (talk · contribs · count) Applying for what could be a useful tool for a diverse range of articles. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 12:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Fayedizard (talk) 12:38, 15 August 2012 (UTC) would be great for the disability articles.[reply]
  48. User:Till I Go Home—I would love to have access to this as there are various sources about British pop music from English newspapers (such as The Indepdendent) that I would like to use for articles that I'm working on. I have made almost 8,000 edits to Wikipedia since joining in May 2009. Till I Go Home 12:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Moorlock (talk · contribs) Love to dig in the dusty stacks. Moorlock (talk) 13:06, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Thoughtfortheday (talk · contribs) I have 4000 edits on English Wikipedia. I like to refer to periodicals, and access to subscription only material would improve the quality of my contributions.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  51. EEng (talk · contribs · count) Would like wider access to sources lending notability to topics. Plus my particular interest: bringing Phineas Gage to GA or higher. Modestly believe I have a clear understanding of use and citation of sources [11]. (Have verified I have no access via other routes.) EEng (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  52. User:Bagworm: I've made several thousand edits over the last few years to a wide range of topics including literature, geography and biography. As I live far from a library I find lack of access to reliable sources a major disadvantage. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  53. User:Miniapolis: Registered editor since 2007; very active with content creation (two articles so far, and I hope to create more) and article improvement (over 9,000 edits, nearly all in main space and non-automated, since late 2010). My local library has inadequate access to research materials appropriate for Wikipedia.
  54. KathrynLybarger (talk · contribs) I have over 14000 edits on a wide variety of topics. More reliable sources for content verification would be most useful. -- KathrynLybarger (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Samar (talk · contribs) - 6 years, +1000 edits. Work on expanding and creating new articles. Samar Talk 14:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  56. benzband (talk · contribs) 1 year (19 August precisely) and over 10000 edits in many areas of Wikipedia and the mainspace. I don't live near any libraries, and if i did they are in french which isn't as useful on the *English* Wikipedia. I suspect this tool will be handy in finding usable (as in "reliable") sources. 14:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  57. tjarrett (talk · contribs) 6 years, > 2000 edits. Focus in English Wikipedia on articles related to the University of Virginia. There are many published research papers that are reliable sources that I'd like to be able to cite going forward. 15:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
  58. K8 fan (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia editor since October 2006 on a wide range of topics. I create new articles, improve existing ones and attempt to bring them to "Good" or even "Featured" status. Currently I use Google Books, and Highbeam would fill in the gaps. K8 fan (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Prolog (talk · contribs) - A wider range of sources would be helpful when working on articles related to historical sporting figures and events. Prolog (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  60. TheOldJacobite (talk · contribs) - Editor on English Wikipedia for nearly 5 years; 57,000+ edits; interested in doing research to improve articles in the areas of literary and artistic Modernism and the 20th century avant-garde; especially articles related to William S. Burroughs. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Gyrofrog (talk · contribs). Editor since April 2004, >43,000 edits. Mainly active in WP:JAZZ, WP:ETHIOPIA and WP:SOMALIA topic areas. Thanks!
  62. Peter M. Brown (talk · contribs) 2 years, ~1500 edits, mainly concerned with zoological evolution. No academic affiliation. JSTOR is the only relevant service provided by my public library. Peter M. Brown (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Diego Grez (talk · contribs) I think this would help me with my work on Chilean topics. Diego Grez (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Savidan (talk · contribs) Editor since December 2005. >50,000 edits. I recently graduated from law school and thus no longer have access to all the free resources that I used to. Savidan 17:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  65. mercy11 (talk · contribs) Editor since 2009. Over 5,000 edits. I never add anything I cannot cite. This will be useful. Mercy11 (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  66. TopGun (talk · contribs) 5+ years, 15000+ edits: regular contributor. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:57, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  67. AllyD (talk · contribs), editor since 2005 with over 11,000 live edits. Active mainly around political philosophy, Scottish, music topics, and in new page patrolling, AfD etc. so access to referencing resuorces beyond Google would be useful. AllyD (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Rockfang (talk · contribs · count), I've been editing here for over 4 and a half years and I have over 20,000 live edits.--Rockfang (talk) 18:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  69. User:Darkness Shines First edit Jul 07, 2011, 9,559 as of this post. Focus on history articles as well as human rights abuses. Access to this resource would be beneficial for obtaining quality sources for the article I work on and create. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  70. INeverCry (talk · contribs), active since 2010, 32000 edits. I work primarily on Russian and Soviet writer articles where sources can be hard to find, so hopefully highbeam would provide me with more. INeverCry 18:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Slgrandson (talk · contribs · count) - 10,000+ permanent edits on EN WP since early 2005. Focusing on animated and children's media these days. Already registered on Highbeam (as "proudheartlover" since late 2005), but can't log in the right way again for some reason. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 19:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  72. j8079s (talk · contribs) I need all the help I can get
  73. Wikipedical (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005 (!), 7000+ edits on the English Wikipedia. Active in popular culture and politics. Would love to access HighBeam and its wonderful resources for references. -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  74. SarekOfVulcan (talk · contribs) - long-time editor, fair number of articles started from scratch, lots of articles with added references, love to be able to do that to more of them. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:46, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Droodkin (talk · contribs) - 1,200+ edits since 2011 as well as being a long time user of Wikipedia since 2006. I focus on WikiProject Bahrain articles (mostly to do with the History of Bahrain)and would really appreciate the resources. --Droodkin (talk) 20:23, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  76. User:Black Falcon. English Wikipedia w/ 50,000+ edits of which 15,000+ mainspace. My main areas of content creation are politics/politicians, history and Africa. I often write about topics for which publicly available online sources are hard to come by, so access to HighBeam would be a great help. -- Black Falcon (talk) 21:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  77. User:Yoninah. English Wikipedia editor since 2005 with over 18,000 edits (over 11,000 in mainspace). I work primarily in content generation, research, and verification of articles about Jewish rabbis and yeshivas, and come across HighBeam articles frequently, such as archived Jerusalem Post articles. Having access to these articles would improve my citations and verifiability. Yoninah (talk) 21:49, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  78. User:5 albert square. English Wikipedia sysop and editor, been a member since 2008 with over 39,000 edits. I work mainly referencing television related articles and BLPs. Some of the articles, particularly the older ones, have difficulty finding sources, I think Highbeam would be of great use.--5 albert square (talk) 22:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Dalahäst (talk · contribs) — been on Wikipedia for a few years; became more active as of late. Currently 3000-some edits. Would be useful in adding sources to newer articles, something I see a lot from recent changes / new page patrolling. I've often wanted access to something like this to either add sources to an unsourced article, or verify the accuracy of new material, and this looks like a great way to do that.  dalahäst (let's talk!) 22:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  80. User:Musdan77 - Editor for 3 1/2 years, with 4,000 edits; editing mostly in biblical, and biographical topics, especially in arts and entertainment. --Musdan77 (talk) 22:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  81. User:Moriori - Have been here just over 10 years (but with account since Oct 03). Irregular contributor, but that's about to change soon and I can spend more time editing en.Wiki. HighBeam would be of incalculable benefit to me. Moriori (talk) 22:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  82. User:emerson7 - i have over 40,000 edits since 2006. Highbeam is an invaluable source for validating claims, and crosschecking assertions in references given by editors. it would be great to have unfettered access. --emerson7 00:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Andrevan@ - admin since 2004, 12,000 edits since 2006. Andrevan@ 00:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Bertaut (talk) 00:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  85. FlugKerl 8000 edits on Aviation pages in last two years FlugKerl (talk) 00:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Zoupan (talk · contribs) - 2 years, 10,000+ edits, mostly in content such as history, geography and culture of the Balkans.--Zoupan 00:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  87. User:GenQuest I am a history buff and like to correct the historically inaccurate entries rampant in new bio and historical articles. I've done a lot of library research on historical figures in the past, but a recent cross-country move has separated me from my sources. This would help! Thank you. GenQuest (talk) 01:22, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  88. User:LadyofShalott - have been on English Wikipedia since 2006 and have over 40k edits. Involved in content creation in a variety of subjects with 2 GAs. This resource would aid me in expanding and creating articles. LadyofShalott 02:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  89. User:Til Eulenspiegel - over 10K edits since 2007 and several articles created. I would love to use this resource for more research. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 02:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Mathonius (talk) -- My edits on en.wikipedia (±5,500) mainly consist of reverting and reporting vandalism, but I often write articles on nl.wikipedia (57,000 edits since 2010) and would love to have access to this resource. Mathonius (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  91. User:Dcirovic - over 80K edits globaly in the last couple of years, mainly in the area of natural sciences. --Dcirovic (talk) 02:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  92. User:Clarityfiend - 75K edits. Films are my most frequent topic, but I'm also into biographies, history, whatever piques my interest. I have on occasion been unable to access hibeam sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  93. User:Jsayre64 - Wikipedian since 2010; 8,500+ edits. I could use this for articles on Oregon and its history to help with WP:ORE, my main editing interest. Jsayre64 (talk) 03:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  94. User:Torsodog - Editing on and off for almost 5 years, 11k+ edits. Subjects I stick with are usually Chicago, Japan and baseball. I strive to make the articles/lists I work on good enough for featured status. In the past I've had to abandon several featured article goals on niche subjects because I wasn't able to verify info that I knew was on highbeam. It was infuriating. --TorsodogTalk
  95. Eastlaw (talk · contribs · count) - active since March 2006, 73,000+ edits, mostly on law, politics, economics, history, and related subjects. Access to HighBeam would be very useful for me. --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 04:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Peterdownunder (talk · contribs) - active on Simple English Wikipedia, with 21,000 edits over four years. --Peterdownunder (talk) 04:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Lilitik22 (talk · contribs) - I'm an active editor in Armenian Wikipedia with about 3000 edits over 1.5 year. --Lilitik22 (talk) 04:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  98. ManiacParisien (talk · contribs) - active on French Wikipedia with 2000 edits in two years. --ManiacParisien (talk) 05:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Camw (talk · contribs) - 25,000 edits and 7 years on en.wikipedia with over 100 articles created and 20+ DYKs. Would use the service for new articles as well as improving existing articles, mostly focused on wine and football areas. Thank you. Camw (talk) 05:34, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Vojtech.dostal (talk · contribs) - 26,518 edits in 5 years on Czech Wikipedia, ca. 1500 articles created, mostly Biology/Chemistry. Thank You! --Vojtech.dostal (talk) 05:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Retired electrician (talk · contribs) - barely over 1k edits on Russian wikipedia but 2 FAs and some GAs. Subjects: history of technology, biographies, random improvements of other FA/GA candidates. Retired electrician (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Thierry Caro (talk · contribs). I'm an admin on the French Wikipédia, that I have edited more than 140 000 times. Thierry Caro (talk) 06:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Vyom25 (talk · contribs)- Over 3000 edits in English Wikipedia and over 4000 edits globally. I mainly edit articles related to India and various Sports in general. Thank you.--Vyom25 (talk) 06:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  104. CarlesMartin (talk · contribs) - I'm active on Catalan Wikipedia, more than 60.000 edits, my subjects are chess and sports in general.
  105. Ylee (talk · contribs) - 15,000 edits over eight years. I never do just typos or punctuation fixes, but always seek to make meaningful contributions, large or small. Looking over my edit history I see articles on sports, military history, political science and history, biographies, film and TV shows, and universities; you name it, I've edited it.
  106. Florentyna (talk · contribs)- 60,000+ edits in de, en, commons. 6,000+ articles created. Mainly things related to sports, especially badminton. I often met HighBeam as source possible to be cited, but without an account the articles were only partially seen.
  107. --Yoavd (talk) 07:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC) I have 40000 edits in the Hebrew wikipedia.[reply]
  108. FocalPoint (talk · contribs) more active in elwiki, admin in el wiki, active since 2005, >42000 edits, indicative interests (but not limited) politics, history, literature
  109. OpenFuture (talk · contribs) - A user since 2008, I spend much of my time verifying claims, adding course and removing the unverifiable, for example at List of Knights Templar sites. --OpenFuture (talk) 08:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Hgetnet(talk|contribs) - I am mostly active in the Amharic Wikipedia with 12,423 edits in total. Hgetnet (talk) 09:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  111. மதனாஹரன்-1+ year, 6611 edits in Tamil Wikipedia. --மதனாஹரன் (talk) 10:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Deinocheirus (talk · contribs) — more than 20,000 edits and 600 articles in Russian Wikipedia, more than 4 years of editing. --Deinocheirus (talk) 10:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Papacha (talk · contribs)- 5,000+ edits on English Wikipedia; mostly verification/custodial. Always looking to attribute biographical info/source edits & this'd help immensely. Papacha (talk) 10:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  114. User:Bharathiya - Active volunteer. 1400 edits. 6 years on Wiki. Bharathiya (talk) 10:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  115. V1adis1av (talk · contribs) Over 16,000 edits since 2005, mainly in ru.wikipedia + ru.wiktionary + en.wikipedia. --V1adis1av (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Bill william compton (talk · contribs) – I've been editing English Wikipedia since 2010 and have over 20,000 edits (and 30,800+ global contributions). Besides English Wiki, I'm highly active on Hindi Wikipedia (where I'm also an admin). 5 GAs, 5 FLs and 33+ DYKs on English Wiki, 2 FAs and several DYKs on Hindi Wiki. — Bill william comptonTalk 10:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  117. I write mainly on world heritage sites in he.wiki, and find the lack of sources in Hebrew very frustrating. Broccolo (talk) 11:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  118. I've been involved in creating, editing, and reviewing articles about Singapore and business organisations on en.wikipedia since 2009. Access to a wide range of reference material would be useful during citation. ♠♠ BanëJ ♠♠ (Talk) 11:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Mackensen (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia and Commons. I would use HighBeam to verify the opening dates for railway stations in the United States. HighBeam frequently appears on my search results.
  120. lentower (talk · contribs · count) Editing since 2006. 12000+ edits, plus those before I made an account. Be so much better than google.com.
  121. Epsilon0 (talk · contribs · count) 6+ years, 12000+ edits on the french wikipedia, especially in mathematical logic.
  122. User:Oleola. 12000+ edits on English and Polish wikipedia, working on football related articles.--Oleola (talk) 12:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Hindustanilanguage (talk · contribs) Active Editor on English Wiki and Hindi Wiki, Contributor and Filemover on Wikimedia Commons, and also other Wikis with over 15000+ contributions in all (Since January 2011).
  124. Iselilja (talk · contribs) Signed up more than a year ago, mainly active the last months on Norwegian Wikipedia. 1000+ edits, mostly history, politics and society in general.
  125. Smallchief (talk · contribs) Active since 2010; 6,000 edits; created or made major contributions to more than 150 articles. Principal interest: history, esp. history and archaeology of North American Indians. Smallchief:(talk)
  126. Pras (Contrib — Statistic — Global) active mainly in Javanese Wikipedia since 2007 with >70k edits. Interested in political research as well as geography, biography, history and other related matters. Pras (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  127. SteveBaker (talk · contribs) Active since 2005, 24,000 edits. I WikiGnome on hundreds of articles - and having the ability to search this motherlode of references would be a boon to my work here. SteveBaker (talk) 14:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  128. எஸ்ஸார் (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008. 1060 edits in ta wiki. 480 edits in en wiki and few contributions on commons and other wikis. I need to expand articles related to Tamil Nadu history and Southern Indian history. A HighBeam account might be helpful on his.
  129. User:Ttzavaras Active since 11 Dec. 2007, 40,330 edits in el.Wikipedia (mostly WW II History, geography and biographies), some small activity in en.Wikipedia and fr.Wikipedia.
  130. Secret of success (talk · contribs) Been here for nearly a year and a half. Primary subjects of interest include Indian cinema and other India-related articles. Secret of success (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Shearonink Yes *please*, I would love to have access to the HighBeam database. 11,000+ edits, active since 2010. Shearonink (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Themfromspace (talk · contribs)20000+ edits over 4+ years. ThemFromSpace 16:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  133. درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs) 14000+ edits over 4+ years. I Working in multilpe in Persian Wikipedia, such as Archaeology and Photography. Have made 4 Featured Articles. Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 17:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  134. وحید قاسمیان (talk · contribs) 4500 edits over 1 year and 8 month in farsi wikipedia.--وحید قاسمیان (talk) 17:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Pseudo-Richard (talk · contribs) 10,000+ edits to English Wikipedia over 6 years --Pseudo-Richard (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Ladsgroup (talk · contribs · count) over six years and +38000 edits in fa.wp. I need for writing featured article (I already have six):)Ladsgroupبحث 18:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  137. sicaspi, 6 years , ~ 14 k edits on fa wiki (Here), working in multiple topics in Farsi wikipedia. --sicaspi (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Faramarz (talk · contribs) +7000 edits in fa.wikipedia and +1000 edits in fa.wikinews with more than of 1 year activity in Persian Wikipedia and Persian Wikinews. --Faramarz♚♔♚ 19:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  139. CRGreathouse (talk · contribs) administrator with over 10,000 edits on the English Wikipedia since 2006. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  140. disavian (talk · contribs) with 40,000+ edits, five FAs and two FLs since 2006. Disavian (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Bamse (talk · contribs) 20,000+ edits on en.wikipedia, active since 2005. Mostly writing about culture and history topics particularly about Japan. I would like to continue writing in this field and think that HighBeam could be useful in this respect. bamse (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Bbb23 (talk · contribs) administrator with over 32,000 edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Mion (talk · contribs) 15000 edits since 2005. Content creation on technologies, verifying content and updating references in time. Mion (talk) 21:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Ds13 (talk · contribs) WP editor since 2004. All subjects, 4,600 edits. Citation, citation, citation. :) --Ds13 (talk) 22:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Glavkos (talk · contribs) 20.000+ global edits, mostly in el.wikipedia (6.000+ edits) and el.wikinews. My contributions in el.wikipedia are mostly about litrature, history, artists biographies and linguistics. I am also sysop on el.wikinews and quite active on translatewiki.net.Glavkos (talk) 23:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Jojalozzo (talk · contribs) citation gnome, over 10k edits since 2007. Thank you. Jojalozzo 23:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) doing mostly underserviced alternative comics and pre-WWII comic strips. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 23:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Makecat (talk · contribs), active since 2010, over 24,000 edits on zhwiki (3 FAs, 1 FL, 2 GAs, 95 DYKs). And 4,500 edits on enwiki, with 90 articles created. I need access to sources to create and expand chemistry and astronomy articles. --MakecatTalk 01:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  149. The Determinator (talk · contribs · count)02:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  150. TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs), active since 2005, 180,000+ edits on en.wiki. I've found many articles on HighBeam that would be beneficial to creation of articles on shopping malls and retail in general — many times I can get the info I need from the preview, but quite often I find I need a little more. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Tomwsulcer (talk · contribs), active since 2009, 9,634 edits, almost all on en.wiki. Perhaps tens of millions of readers. I continue to like to revamp articles -- here are many which I wrote substantial portions of; Highbeam would be great for my ability to contribute. Many times I've hunted for information only to come across the Highbeam paywall, and couldn't get it.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 02:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  152. My76Strat (talk · contribs), Joined in March 2010, +28000 edits. I am currently coordinating for WikiProject Record Production and can foresee significant benefit from the additional sources, especially the trade magazines. 76Strat String da Broke da (talk) 02:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Huji (talk · contribs) 30000+ edits over 4 years. I have been mostly active on Persian Wikipedia and Simple English wikipedia. I am a current Admin and Bureaucrat in Persian Wikipedia, and I am interested to use HighBeam to find resources that can help me with expanding articles on IT related subjects, as well as those related to math and statistics. huji—TALK 02:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Spyder_Monkey (talk · contribs) 21,000+ edits since 2006. Working on articles about the history of motorsport and of Alabama. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 02:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Kansas Bear 13K edits since 2006. I edit from England to the Indus River during the medieval period. Mainly adding references to typically unreferenced articles. --Defensor Ursa 04:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Mspraveen (talk · contribs) 10k+ edits, multiple GAs and DYKs. This is wonderful! I've always found sources lacking for a lot of Indian articles. This will help a great deal to me! Mspraveen (talk) 04:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Kafziel (talk · contribs) Editing since 2005, admin since 2007, 20,000+ edits. Always looking to improve article sources. Many thanks for the opportunity! Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 05:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Tenkasi Subramanian - 7000 edits in 1 year. --Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 07:09, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  159. TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) - An editor for long and have got 5 articles promoted to GA status and 1 DYK. Also, I've reviewed 23 GA nominations thus I feel that this can be really useful. TheSpecialUser TSU 07:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  160. AlleinStein (talk · contribs) - 5000+ edits since 2008 at vi.wiki. AlleinStein (talk) 08:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  161. پسر یاس (talk) 10:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  162. قلی زادگان (talk · contribs · count)3.5+ years,2500+ edits on the fa.wikipedia
  163. Aarash (talk · contribs) over 180000 edit and active from 2009 in persian wikipedia. i am an admin and Bureaucrat in fa.wikipedia (persian wikipedia) now and i wanna use "HighBeam", "Credo accounts" and "Questia" to find reliable resources to write historical article. fa:user:آرش is my main account. it's "Aarash" in Persian alphabet!
  164. Ashley_thomas80 (talk · contribs · count) Interested in history, science and society. Will be highly helpful, if provided. TIA
  165. Biblbroks (talk · contribs · count) 6 years active on en, sh, sr, en.wiktionary. 10.000+ edits. Interested in history and science. --biblbroks (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  166.  Buaidh  – 124,231 edits and counting – 14:55, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Mike Cline, (Talk)) A godsend for serious editors --Mike Cline (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Mareklug (talk · contribs · count) Mainly en and pl wiki, also commons. Lately sourcing poorly-sourced articles, across-the-board interests.
  169. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk · contribs · count) A maven of [citation needed]; would love to be able to insert more actual citations instead....
  170. Blackknight12 (talk · contribs · count) active in English Wikipedia with 12,500+ edits since 2008. I mostly work with Sri Lanka based topics and access to more reliable and larger group of work will allow for a much more reliable and tension disruptive free Wikiproject Sri Lanka.--Blackknight12 (talk) 18:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Cryptic C62 (talk · contribs · count) content writer and peer reviewer with over 8000 edits since 2006.
  172. Mayooranathan Over 26,000 edits in Tamil Wikipedia since 2003 (Tamil Wikipedia User Page). I am an admin and Bureaucrat in the same. I contribute on topics related to Art, Architecture, language and History. It will be helpful if I get access to "HighBeam" account. -- Mayooranathan (talk) 18:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Geni 28K edits since 2004. Would be useful for local history stuff and the like.©Geni 20:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Hungda (talk · contribs) - 20K+ edits since 2009 at vi.wiki. Hungda (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Bearian (talk · contribs · count) - admin and content editor with over 49,000 edits; additional research tools would be very useful to me to assist the project.
  176. Verman1 (talk · contribs) - 12K edits since 2010. Mostly active in Azerbaijani Wikipedia, also actively contribute in English and Russian Wikipedias. Mostly doing research on history, geography, mathematics, computing. I wanna use "HighBeam", "Credo accounts" and "Questia" in order to get better and more detailed sources for my contributions in future. --Verman1 (talk) 06:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  177. User:JamesMLane. English Wikipedia. I've created and edited articles in two main groups: American politics, and whatever book I happen to be reading at the moment. I've occasionally encountered HighBeam links without knowing much about the service and without wanting to pay to find out. If I had a free account I would definitely give it a fair shot just out of curiosity. JamesMLane t c 14:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  178. paddy2706 (talk · contribs · count). Mainly German wikipedia (10k+, 6+yrs), recently started contributing to english too.
  179. Camerafiend. 2500+ edits since 2005 on en-wp. Active content creator, especially on New Mexico-related topics; would benefit from access to a wider range of research materials. Camerafiend (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  180. bezik (talk · contribs · count), editor and administrator in Russian Wikipedia, 15k edits, Bezik (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Truthsort (talk · contribs · count), Active since 2010 with 2,330+ edits. Truthsort (talk) 21:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  182. SreejithInfo (talk) 21:28, 18 August 2012 (UTC) : On Wikipedia since 2007, Reviewer since 2010, 3300+ edits[reply]
  183. User:SiameseTurtle, Active English Wikipedia user with 3500+ edits. I research longevity claims, which are heavily reliant on good access to newspaper articles SiameseTurtle (talk) 23:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Scheinwerfermann (talk · contribs · count) • Nearly 10,000 edits since 2005. I tend to focus my efforts on articles about automotive-, lighting-, traffic-, and human sexuality-related topics and have frequently bumped my head against sources I'd like to see that are available only via HighBeam Research. —Scheinwerfermann T·C01:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Ryoga Godai (talk). Been editing for about 3 years now and 18000+ edits. I wish to do some anime/manga/music articles in September. A HighBeam account would really be useful to me. Ryoga Godai (talk) 03:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Cerevisae (talk) I have been editing Wikipedia since the year 2009 and with edits counts of over 1000. I'm especially interested in Sarawak political articles such as Sarawak_state_election,_1969 which I contributed significantly. Malaysian newspapers generally remove their news archives after a year or two, so I have to resort to HighBeam for archived local and international news dated back in the 1990s. I'm now interested to recreate Tawi Sli and expand Bruno Manser article in this one year period.Cerevisae (talk) 04:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Peaceray (talk): I have been editing since the year 2010 & with count of over 3200 edits over 17 projects. I have already bumped into the Highbeam paywall several times & it would be useful for me to fully view Highbeam content. Peaceray (talk) 04:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  188. User:Manway. Active on the English Wikipedia as a vandal fighter and verification guru for others. Over 11,000 English Wikipedia edits in over 5 years of editing. Use for verification of claims by other editors.
  189. Medeis (talk · contribs) Reference desk editor, article creator and DYK and ITN contributor. μηδείς (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  190. User:ThatPeskyCommoner Been on English Wikipedia since 2006; 18,000+ edits. Pesky (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Adavidb. Active editor of English Wikipedia since 2006, approaching 16,000 edits. Intend to use HighBeam access to find and cite reliable sources for article content, including verification of updates to over 600 watchlist articles, many related to American history. —ADavidB 06:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  192. User:Marokwitz. More than 14,000 edits on Wikipedia, active for over 6 years. Main research interests include terrorism, military history, history of the middle east. Marokwitz (talk) 10:15, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Smkolins (talk) 11:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC) English Wikipedia though I've touched a few others. Primarily issues related to religion but also some on science especially astronomy and here and there on climate change.[reply]
  194. User:Froid. Froid 11:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Totodu74 (talk) On French Wikipedia since 2008 ; 60 000+ edits ; admin. Mostly interested in biology (for ex zoology). Totodu74 (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  196. David Fuchs -- Editor since 2005 w/ >25,000 edits; natural sciences (esp. paleontology); media and new media; history. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 15:54, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  197. olive: Editor since 2006, edit count 15,000+.(olive (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]
  198. Egg Centric (talk · contribs · count) Egg Centric 17:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Thom2002 (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC) 2000+ edits, 5+ years, this would be a great help with government and politics articles.[reply]
  200. Lobo512 Registered user for a year, 2800+ edits. My focus is on writing content so Highbeam access would be very useful. --Lobo (talk) 21:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Matt Heard (talk · contribs) Registered user for many years with a focus on source mining, minor editing, and community support. 1000+ edits.
  202. Kaini (talk · contribs) Wikipedian since 2006 with 7000+ edits; lately I tend to focus on food- and music-related articles, supplying cites when I can find them, and general wikignoming (typos, punctuation, and grammar errors) when I come across something that needs fixing. Kaini (talk) 00:05, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  203. User:JohnCengiz77. I'm most active in the English Wikipedia, with 10,350 edits. I have contributed to a wide variety of articles over 2 years. I intend to further my work on biographical articles. John Cengiz talk 03:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Strebe (talk · contribs) 2500+ scholarly edits since 2003. Strebe (talk) 04:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  205. User:JTSchreiber. I do a variety of work on English Wikipedia, including content generation and verification. I work on articles in various subject areas, with medicine, television and the environment being the most common. JTSchreiber (talk) 04:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Yerpo (talk · contribs). Mostly active in Slovene Wikipedia with 62000+ edits, I write on all sorts of general topics outside my central interest (biology), including biographies, recent events, and history.
  207. Smsarmad (talk · contribs) I am on English Wikipedia since 2007 and have more than 20,000 edits. Most of my contributions are in Pakistan and Military History topic areas. Besides I am also expanding my contributions in Computer Science field recently. --SMS Talk 07:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  208.  pablo 08:13, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Sidsahu (talk · contribs) Wikipedian since 2006 with 1477 edits and 71 articles created.I have contributed to Ancient Indian history, biographies of kings,film stars and hindu sages. Also covering hinduism related articles sids 08:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Talk[reply]
  210. Meetthefeebles (talk · contribs) Wikipedian for over two years with more than 2200 edits, including three stub-to-GA's and three more pending review. Access to resource would be very useful for my continued work on Geography articles. Meetthefeebles (talk) 08:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Giuliopp (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia (occasionally Italian); +1000 edits; active mainly in the field of aviation and more generally science and technology. Intend to help clean up 'Citation needed' templates and expand existing articles.
  212. Ghirlandajo (talk · contribs). Editor for 8 years. 200 000+ contributions in Russian Wikipedia and here. --Ghirla-трёп- 12:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  213. OwenX (talk · contribs). Editor/admin for 7.5 years, 20,000+ edits. HighBeam access would help me in digging up citations, mostly for business/finance related articles. Owen× ☎ 13:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Istvan (talk · contribs) Here for 7 years.István 15:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Ghmyrtle (talk · contribs) Over 6 years experience, mainly content building, 43,000 edits, 540+ new articles mainly covering music biography and UK places. Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  216. Skeezix1000 (talk · contribs) Here for almost 7 years. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  217. Danmichaelo (talk · contribs) Active editor for ~ 14 months, primarily at Norwegian Wikipedia (17k edits), content creation work mainly (or so I believe) within international politics and politicians bios, geography, science and history of science. – Danmichaelo (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  218. TedPavlic (talk · contribs) 22:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Laveol (talk · contribs) Active on history and Balkans-related articles. Articles on the Balkans are in need of reliable English-language sources and the account could prove helpful in this respect. I also make the occasional edit (mostly corrections) to other articles. More active in terms of content generation on the Bulgarian-language wikipedia. --Laveol T 23:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Psalm84 (talk · contribs) Would use on a variety of subjects as I see a need. Psalm84 (talk) 00:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Of (talk · contribs · count)
  222. AuthorityTam (talk · contribs · count) Since 2008 I have over 3,000 edits, mostly on religion and the Bible, but an eclectic mix of other stuff too. I often seek to add refs where warranted. --AuthorityTamtalk…contrib 03:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  223. Japf (talk · contribs · count) More than 6000 editions since 2006 in the portuguese wikipedia. Editions mainly templates or articles related to calendars, longevity or conversion between the brazilian and european versions of portuguese language.Japf (talk) 13:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  224. StoneProphet (talk · contribs) ~4000 edits on En-Wiki since 2009/2010; mostly history/milhist related StoneProphet (talk) 14:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Gilabrand (talk · contribs) Have been editing Wikipedia for over six years with 40,043 eits to my credit. Highbeam access is critical for my work on articles in the realm of Israel, the Arab world and Judaism. --Geewhiz (talk) 14:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  226. GeorgeLouis I do research in 19th Century U.S. history, mostly in California and the West. I've written a TON of articles. Thank you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Alfietucker I have been registered with Wikipedia since 2006 and have made over 2,650 edits. My main interest is Russian culture and music, and I intend to improve articles within that subject area, particularly concerning individuals and institutions active in the 20th and 21st centuries. Alfietucker (talk) 18:56, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  228. y (talk · contribs) - editor since 2007 on this username, sysop since before that, I work on biographies mostly, but I like to source all kinds of articles. -- Y not? 20:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Carlstak (talk · contribs) Have been editing English Wikipedia since one year ago today. I've made over 2100 edits, created several articles, and added content to a couple hundred. I'm interested in an eclectic variety of subjects, especially history, most particularly that of Spain. Member of WikiProject Spain. Having access to HighBeam's resources would be very useful to my background reading, research, verification, and content writing. Carlstak (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Fraggle81 (talk · contribs · count) I am an editor with over 5 years of experience and over 10000 edits. My main work is vandal fighting and verification of facts is of great importance for correctly identifying vandalism. I would also like to have the resources to create and expand articles. Fraggle81 (talk) 02:02, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  231. Taz Hi, I 'm editor of Hungarian wiki mostly, from 2008, and commons uploader of slovakian monuments. I have more than 9000 main edits. I would like to use the database for Archaeology, Slovakian villages and articles of other subjects. Thanks! Taz talk
  232. Belchfire (talk · contribs) Active contributor involved in article creation, clean-up and verification, also recently becoming involved in DYK. Belchfire-TALK 19:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  233. Cloudbound (talk · contribs) I have over 26,000 edits and have been going since 2005. This would really help with my work on aviation articles, as I've been looking for good sources to held with them. Cloudbound (talk) 21:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Theopolisme (talk · contribs) I think the resource would be a great help in my content creation work... :) Theopolisme :) 21:35, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Donner60 (talk · contribs) I applied for Questia on August 17. I see the request period for High Beam is nearing an end and 1,000 requests for all rounds together have not yet been made so I would like to add my request here also. If there are too many requests here, however, or if an editor can have only one of the accounts, I would opt for Questia. It does seem that High Beam also could be useful for my areas of interest and for DYK nomination review. I have been editing since July 2010. As of this posting, I have 4,016 edits on 949 pages; 74 new articles created; a few dozen existing pages substantially expanded or revised; 11 DYKs from articles created. I also occasionally review DYK nominations (22). I mainly work on history and biography, with a concentration on American history, especially American Civil War. Donner60 (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  236. TimidGuy (talk · contribs) Have been active in Wikipedia since 2006, with around 8,000 edits last time I checked. I'd like to have access to this. TimidGuy (talk) 10:54, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  237. Modernist - more than 75k edits...Modernist (talk) 14:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  238. Jojalozzo - citation gnome, around 15k edits. Jojalozzo 20:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  239. User:Keithbob - I meet all of the requirements (22,000 edits) and agree to the terms of usage. I would really like to have this subscription as my research for article revision and expansion is often blocked by requests for payment and/or subscription to High Beam in order to view a periodical as a source. Thanks.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  240. Mehran (talk · contribs) - Over six years activity and +11000 edits. Also sysop in fawiki. ●Mehran Debate● 16:55, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  241. DJ Nietzsche (talk · contribs) Active on Spanish Wikipedia; 14,000+ edits since 2007. I use to write articles about psychology (mainly memory processes and psychopathology) --DJ Nietzsche (talk) 21:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Gotyear (talk · contribs) - I like to verify citation needed tags and replace online citations that have rotted, both small but important activities that a HighBeam subscription would help enormously. Gotyear (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  243. 2T (talk · contribs · count) - Have been active in TH WP since 2006, with 80,000+ edits 2T (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Rohit Rawat - I am hyper active on Hindi Wikipedia with 12,000+ edits there and 10,000+ edits to Hindi Wiktionary and I'm an admin as well on both of these. I write all types of articles. I have edits to English Wikipedia as well and I fulfill all the requirements. My account is more close to three years old. I would very much like have access to this material. I hope I'll be given subscription and I thank for that. रोहित रावत (talk) 14:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Dúnadan (talk · contribs) - 6774 edits in the English Wikipedia, and over 17,000 in the Catalan Wikipedia where I am an administrator since 2006. -- dúnadan : let's talk 14:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  246. SteveStrummer (talk · contribs) - Regular editor since 2008, 12k+ edits. I currently have no access to HighBeam. SteveStrummer (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Mehdiabbasi (talk · contribs) I have enough requirements in fawiki with mehdiabbasi username. Mehdiabbasi (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT APPLY HERE APPLY IN ROUND 6 BELOW

Round 6

Delivery in January
  1. Tony Sidaway (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia member since 2004. I have made around 25,000 edits to articles along the way. I edit articles in areas such as current affairs, technology and science policy where a historical view is often lacking, and access to newspaper archives (which I don't currently have) would be helpful in maintaining a longer view. --TS 12:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Gombang (talk · contribs) Indonesian Wikipedia editor since 2006, sysop since 2008, with more than 9000 edits. Access will be helpful for me to expand and improve lots of articles in Indonesian Wikipedia. Gombang (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Bennylin (talk · contribs) more than 100.000 edits in Indonesian projects (Indonesian wp, Javanese wp, Indonesian wikt primarily). Particularly interested in documents for Wikisource (Indonesian, Javanese, Sundanese, and other languages of Indonesia)
  4. Sjones23 (talk · contribs) over 40,000 edits since 2006. I edit articles such as video games, music, television shows, films and anime. Access will be very helpful in expanding and improving articles to the highest degree possible. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Connormah (talk · contribs) - usually do research in finding biographical info, this could help a great deal with finding sources. – Connormah (talk) 23:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rahmatdenas (talk · contribs) Today, I have over 4,000 edits on Indonesian Wikipedia since 2011. This would be very valuable to me in all of areas, has key resources not found elsewhere. Rahmatdenas (talk) 08:33, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. جواد (talk · contribs) Since 2009 , about 11,000 edits in fa@wiki Javad|Talk 16:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Mahan (talk · contribs) Over one years activity and +3000 edits in fa@wiki.--ماهان (talk) 09:58, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. So God created Manchester (talk · contribs) 6,915 edits. Would be helpful for writing articles on documentaries, especially when it comes to searching for past reviews.--SGCM (talk) 13:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Abebenjoe (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia member since 2006. Has made over 7000 edits, and helped edit two featured articles. I mostly focus on history, Canadian electoral districts, and Human Space Exploration. I have some access to newspapers via the Toronto Public Library, but it is limited in scope, and does not, to my knowledge, include papers included in High Beam. As I also verify and repair citations, having access to this service would be very helpful.--Abebenjoe (talk) 21:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Early morning person (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia member since 2009. 1900 edits. I mainly edit articles about sports figures (e.g. Wayne Gretzky), yoga, meditation. Intentions for future research: more of the same. Would be helpful in getting best refs for these articles, which have a contemporary slant.EMP (talk) 23:40, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. brianhe (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia editor since 2004. Created 100+ new articles, ~23,000 edits. Active member of Motorcycling WikiProject and New Pages Patrol. Would use account for new articles, verification of BLPs and other relevant research. Brianhe (talk) 18:29, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User-multi error: no username detected (help).. English Wikipedia Editor for several years. 40,000 51,000 plus edits. Doing quite a bit of work on DYKs (we just had a 30 in 1 DYK, which set a record) and new articles. Can better research and document articles on myriad of subjects. User:7&6=thirteen User talk:7&6=thirteen7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Martinevans123 (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia editor since 2007. Created a few new articles, ~24,000 edits on a wide range of subjects, often related to music, poetry and history. Would find this a useful tool. I am considering retirement, but this might encourage me to stay. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. CaroleHenson (talk · contribs) - I do not have free access to HighBeam. I do have preferences set to receive emails. I have been on en.WP since 5 February 2011 . I have made more than 26K edits. I am active in content generation, research and verification. This would be incredible!!!--CaroleHenson (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. NearTheZoo (talk · contribs) - My first edit was March 2010, and I have 4700+ live edits. I am an autoreviewer and have created almost 60 pages. I have frequently paid for articles through sources like the New York Times, so High Beam would be a great help. My new articles have included pages about individuals, memorials, organizations, movies, and books, so I do a good amount of research to find good references to ensure wiki articles are well referenced and resourced. This High Beam access would be great for me.NearTheZoo (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Doc9871 (talk · contribs) - I would like access to this to explore and use their content for referencing. I usually rely on Google or books I have on hand to back up and cite content, and would find this resource helpful. Doc talk 06:13, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Zozo2kx (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia editor since 2008, with over 18,000 edits. I edit articles mostly about history/archaeology or geography with a focus on Syria and the Middle East. Yazan (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Tvoz (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2006, just shy of 24,000 edits. Edit interests include but not limited to political biographies; people and events of significance in the popular culture, particularly of the second half of the 20th century; jumping on suddenly high-traffic articles about such people who have recently died but their articles are not up to our standards -- detailed information often not available through the usual middle-of-the-night Google searches. I spend a lot of time doing research for these articles, and immediate access to newspapers, magazines, journals, etc. would be extremely helpful. Also do a lot of fact-checking and reference improving in BLPs that I don't regularly otherwise edit. Tvoz/talk 18:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Taranet (talk · contribs) Editor since 2006, a current Admin in Persian Wikipedia. --Taranet (talk) 17:23, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. NarSakSasLee (talk · contribs) I have around 3,000 edits and have been quite active when I do contribute to articles, often finishing them up to a good standard once started. I'd like to use this in order to start contributing more to science and mechanical engineering articles since that's what I'm studying at in Oxford. I haven't found much up to date information on specific engineering breakthroughs aside from the usual articles on news websites. They're not specific enough and only give surface details. Google books is terrible. The information is usually 1-2 years out and again they only give surface details. This would be a great asset in order for me to contribute more to core articles that may be useful for Wikipedia readers. NarSakSasLee (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. CMBJ (talk · contribs) I am an active contributor who has been with the English Wikipedia since 2004. My scope of research spans a wide array of disparate subjects, including many which are still poorly accessible to the general public. I intend to continue my contributions to the project in such areas indefinitely.   — C M B J   13:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Hex (talk · contribs): Editor on the English Wikipedia for ten years. Admin for five. Major interest in referencing and citation maintenance.
  24. Dedda71 (talk · contribs): editor on the italian wikipedia since 2005, sysop since 2008. I need this resource for research and verification. --Dedda71 (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Raoli (talk · contribs) Italian Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons and particularly Italian Wikiquote In the Wikipedia project I dedicate myself to creation of articles about actuality, groups of people and emerging technologies recently introduced (like QRpedia). On Wikiquote I add quotations about different thematic areas. For these reasons I should sign up. Raoli (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Spacepotato (talk · contribs) I have 24K+ edits and have been an editor here since 2005. I have created and revised a number of astronomy articles and hope to continue working on this in the future. Spacepotato (talk) 09:23, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Dennis Brown (talk · contribs) 29k edits, 6 years, enwp admin that spends edit time tracking sources for other articles (gnoming) and fixing articles. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 11:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Tijfo098 (talk · contribs): I've made about 12K edits since 2010. Access to humanities journals and old newspapers is quite limited for me, but I edit articles which require that as well, e.g. modern history. Tijfo098 (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Rschen7754 (talk · contribs): Editor/admin since 2005, 75K edits, active in FA writing. --Rschen7754 21:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Corporate Minion (talk · contribs): 8,400 edits more than 3.5 years on the site. I edit mostly on business and marketing topics. Corporate 17:41, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Doc Taxon (talk · contribs): I am active in en:WP:REX and especially active in its German brother de:WP:BIBA or de:WP:BIBR. I am looking for articles and literature for all the users who need it, to build well researched articles in English, German and Wikipedia of other languages. Thank you, Doc Taxon (talk) 16:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Neo139 (talk · contribs): 5+years, 5000+ edits. Interested in public policy in general.--Neo139 (talk) 02:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Mennonot (talk · contribs): Editor on English wikipedia since 2004 with 1000+ edits. My editing is focused on faith and politics. mennonot (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  34. TRLIJC19 (talk · contribs): When you count the time on my previous account as well as my time on this account, I have 4+ years of service and 10,000+ edits. In addition, I have written 2 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 20 good articles, 3 DYKs, and 2 A-Class articles. Access to a research site would be very helpful with my content creation. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  35. TBrandley (talk · contribs): I meet all the requirements of the above criteria, having made over 17,000 contributions to the English Wikipedia through over a year now/. I have written or significantly contributed to 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 13 good articles, and 1 A-Class article. I'd appreciate access to this very good website for my Wikipedia work. Thank you. TBrandley 01:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  36. محک (talk · contribs): I have many edit in MZN & FA wikipedias.--محک (talk) 20:52, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  37. D4nnyw14 (talk · contribs): I meet the above requirements and have been editing on the English wikipedia for over 2 years and have made over 7000 edits. I usually edit fictional characters and BLP articles which Highbeam would be an extremely useful tool in doing so. D4nnyw14 (talk) 20:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  38. fajr18 (talk · contribs):3000 edits + over 1 years + one good Article in fawiki. I need for writing featured articles. Fajr18 (talk) 14:26, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  39. SudoGhost (talk · contribs) - Over 20,000 edits over 3 y;ears (active for the last 23 months). I've significantly contributed to articles such as Buford, Georgia and created others such as Foremost (software). I meet the requirements listed, and although I don't have the dozens of GAs or DYKs that other users have, HighBeam access would be a great help with verification on articles that I'm contributing to, and would help in content creation, which I'm currently focusing on. - SudoGhost 00:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Go Phightins! (talk · contribs) - I have amassed about 7200 edits in 21 months and meet the other criteria listed. I'm working on getting a few articles up to GA status and this would be helpful for searching for old news articles for athletes...Google News Archives doesn't always suffice. Go Phightins! 00:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Writ Keeper (talk · contribs) - I have 10k-ish edits in a year and a few months. Since becoming an admin, I've been doing a lot of admin work recently, but I'm trying to break into content creation more, and in my latest few attempts, I've found great sources on HighBeam that would be awesome to have; most recently about the National War Correspondents Monument, for which there were articles in the Washington Post that normal access doesn't cover. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 18:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Grolltech (talk · contribs) 1500+ edits, but my edits tend to be significant changes or overhauls to articles. Have authored several articles, and constantly get stymied by lack of access to subscriber-only content. Nearest libraries that offer JSTOR and others is over an hour away. Grollτech (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Rcsprinter123 (talk · contribs) with almost 30000 edits, I feel like I've made my impact on the encyclopaedia. I've made about 45 articles, some of which were deleted because of insufficient citations. Access to HighBeam would provide me with more sources to work with and hopefully, create and source more articles. As for promoted content, 7 DYKs (1 pending), 1 GA (3 pending), no FAs yet. Rcsprinter (deliver) No, I'm Santa Claus! @ 10:23, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  44. andrewman327 (talk · contribs): Access to this database would be very useful to both my content creation and my work at AFC. Andrew (talk) 19:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Wer900 (talk · contribs): Although I have relatively few (~2,500) edits on the encyclopedia, I have written ten articles and feel that my area of work could benefit substantially with the ability to access paid-only sources. 03:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Jfhutson (talk · contribs): On WP since Oct 2011, > 2,100 edits. Access would be useful for content creation in religious history articles. --JFHutson (talk) 16:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  47. EricEnfermero (talk · contribs): On English WP for just over a year, but ~5,000 edits. Baseball biographies, psychology and nursing are areas where I contribute. Major contributor to at least two GAs. I contribute less often to the Spanish WP, Simple English and Commons. EricEnfermero Howdy! 06:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Rosymonterrey (talk · contribs) Editor since 2009. I have more than 16,000 editions in the Spanish version, over 9,400 in article space. 457 articles created. My interest is mainly focused on biographies and cultural topics. In addition author or co-author in the Spanish Wikipedia in 6 FA an 21 GA. HighBeam access would be a great help to my work.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 11:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Jaontiveros (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008. I have more than 42,000 editions in Spanish Wikipedia. I have created more than 600 articles about history and biographies. If I can read better sources, then I can write better articles. Jaontiveros (talk) 04:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  50. ssriram_mt (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008 with 55,000 edits. Need the research account for writing GA class articles in Wiki project India. Ssriram mt (talk) 01:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Pratyya Ghosh (talk · contribs) I have 13000+ edits in enwiki and 17000+ global edits from 2012. I'm telling my reason very shortly. I edit articles and am also a student. So I think it'll be helpful for both purpose. Editing and giving reliable news and information at WP and study well.--Pratyya (Hello!) 10:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Keithbob (talk · contribs) I have 30,000 edits and have written 16 articles (two of them GA's). I am the top contributor on 60+ articles. I have used HighBeam profusely over the past year but now my subscription seems to have expired and I am once again handicapped in my research and ability to contribute to content creation. Please help! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 19:43, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Chefallen (talk · contribs) I have used highbeam previously and would like to continue to use it to research material for a range of articles in the field of ethnography and cuisines that I am planning on working on. Chefallen (talk) 04:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Gilabrand (talk · contribs) I have used the Highbeam archives extensively over the last year and would like to continue having access to this important source of referencing.--Geewhiz (talk) 06:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Round 7

Round 7 being distributed this week

Approved in round 6 but we ran out of accounts

  1. Tvoz (talk · contribs)
  2. Wer900 (talk · contribs)
  3. Writ Keeper (talk · contribs)
  4. Xanchester (talk · contribs)
  5. Zozo2kx (talk · contribs)
  6. محک (talk · contribs)
  7. جواد (talk · contribs)
    This user is blocked 18 months (and after that he announced his retirement) in fa.wp :)Ladsgroupبحث 15:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Want an account whenever more become available (you haven't had one yet)

  1. User:Ddstretch. English Wikipedia, and a number of projects under that. Editing regularly since 2007, though my first edit was in 2005. Editing mainly in local UK history, but also occasional editing of Chinese-related articles. Administrator since 2008 (though with a break). I intend to continue to edit on local history issues in the UK, but also increase my editing of Chinese-related articles, both historical and current. I am particularly concerned about adequate referencing and sourcing of all material on wikipedia, both existing and new.  DDStretch  (talk) 08:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:Mkdw. I have been an editor of the English Wikipedia since 2006. I have approximately 14,500 edits. I largely work in sourcing articles and improving references. I often help new editors find sources for AfC via the #en-help IRC. I have majorly contributed to 3 FA's, 1 GA, and 1 FP. I would also like access to help improve and check AfD articles and New Page Patrolling where I am actively involved. Mkdwtalk 21:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Ravensfire. Focus on improving existing articles on my watchlist and new "troublesome" articles I tend to get pulled into. Having access to a broader range of sources, especially past issues, will be extremely helpful. Ravensfire (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:Richwales. I have edited the English Wikipedia since 2005 and currently have about 11,000 edits. I work on articles dealing with US citizenship law, Eastern Europe, religion, and my alma mater (Stanford University). I also do gnoming work, including checking and improving sources. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 07:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Storkk (talk · contribs): A HighBeam account would be extremely useful in reference verification tasks. Storkk (talk) 02:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Rosymonterrey (talk · contribs) Editor since 2009. I have more than 16,000 editions in the Spanish version of Wikipedia. 457 articles created. My interest is mainly focused on biographies and cultural topics and British history and culture too. In addition I am author or co-author in the Spanish Wikipedia in 6 FA an 21 GA. I contribute less often to the Enlish WP. HighBeam access would be a great help to my work.--Rosymonterrey (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jaontiveros (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008. I have more than 42,800 editions in Spanish Wikipedia. I have created more than 615 articles about history and biographies. If I can read better sources, then I can write better articles, that is the reason HighBeam access will help me. Jaontiveros (talk) 01:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Tenebrae (talk · contribs) I am a longtime Wikipedia editor, with nearly eight years and more than 75,000 edits to my credit. I have created over 200 articles, including the popular List of African-American firsts. While much of my work has involved popular culture, I've also created articles on newspapers (such as The Daily Compass and Cleveland News), institutions (Lighthouse International), and historical figures (Takeo Ito).
  9. User:Logical Cowboy. More than 9000 edits. Very active in reference verification, particularly AfD and assessing sources on watchlist.
  10. فلورانس (talk · contribs) . hi my Dear wiki Friend i,m patroll,autopatrollers and Rollback in fa.wiki with More than 8297 edits in fa.wiki - i need to this accesse to Development my wiki edit , thanks فلورانس (talk) 09:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    this user is blocked indefinitely for WP:DE in fa.wp :)Ladsgroupبحث 15:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Pi.1415926535 (talk · contribs). Editor since 2006 (most active since 2010); 4500 edits. I work mostly in railroad history particularly involving the MBTA, and Highbeam would be very useful for digging up old journals and newspapers that Google News doesn't cover. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Reify-tech (talk · contribs) 3300+ edits. I work on a wide and eclectic range of topics, including science, technology, art, design, architecture, culture, history of technology, museums, transportation, and biographies of people related to these topics. Reify-tech (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Riana (talk · contribs) >33,000 edits on enwp, user since 2006. Finished university recently so no longer have access to HighBeam. Would be very useful for my areas of article-writing interest, mainly in the field of classical music. ~ Riana ⁂ 15:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Garamond Lethe (talk · contribs) Editor for just over a year, 4k edits, looking forward to using this for philosophy of science and philosophy of mathematics articles. Garamond Lethet
    c     07:37, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Fantr (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008, over 4,100 edits. Numerous literary wikipedia projects about authors not particularly well known but who warrant detailed articles. Have worked on a wide variety of articles, including economics, music, cinema and other areas to provide much-needed citations and remove faulty research especially where BLP issues exist. Have created many articles about people, books and films that have niche interest but meet notability standards. Have contributed to many GA and FL articles, most recently Bernard Lee on stage and screen. This particular list was and remains difficult to research. Google news and google books, though helpful, have obvious limitations and are time consuming when using 'snippet view'. Further, they have an American bias and I need more access to UK and European sources. I strive to properly reference and source articles where reliable source authorities aren't easy to locate. Further certain fields – the James Bond cult, for example – cite books containing dire research and hopeless scholarship. I like to see the original articles to ensure that RS are indeed correct. - Fantr (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Egeymi (talk · contribs) I am now one-year wiki old and I would use my access to enrich biographies and others. Egeymi (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Kurtis (talk · contribs) — I've been a registered editor since 2008 and have accumulated over 5,600 edits in that time, having been particularly active over the past year. I tend to edit articles pertaining to geopolitics, with a particularly strong interest in the Cold War, the Yugoslav Wars, the Middle East, and North Korea. I oftentimes use Google's search engine to look through decades-old news archives for adequate referencing, but some of the articles I come across are unavailable to me and require that I pay to register for an account. HighBeam would eliminate one of the biggest obstacles I tend to face as an editor. Kurtis (talk) 13:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Gareth E Kegg (talk · contribs) I've been editing Wikipedia since 2005, with over 30,000 edits to date. Access to HighBeam would help me greatly in my editing of BLPs and recent historical events that can't be found in the depths of Google Books and Google News. Sources on these sites are often Americancentric, and access to a wider scope would prevent me from haunting the British Library for occasional snippets. There is nothing better than committing a citation to a page, and access to HighBeam would be invaluable.
  19. Hillbillyholiday81 (talk · contribs) currently creating new articles weekly that cover a diverse range of subjects, this tool would be immensely useful in taking my research to the next level. Hillbillyholiday talk 03:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pol430 (talk · contribs) I've been around for about 4 years and have around 20,000 edits. I'd like access to Highbeam because I have a pool of about a dozen articles I would like to expand, but I'm struggling to find reliable sources due to the fairly low profiles of the subject matter. Pol430 talk to me 19:12, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. User:dsouzaron. I have been an English Wikipedia editor since 2006. I have over 2800 edits spread over more than 600 pages. I am also a member of the Schools and Catholicism projects. My main contribution has been in the area of Catholicism in Pakistan and I intend to continue contributing to it. I also have modest contributions in Australia and East Timor.
  22. User:Tucoxn. English Wikipedia (since 2008), French Wikipedia, and Fijian Wikipedia. Over 2,000 edits on English Wikipedia, with over 1,300 unique pages edited and six articles created. I write articles on plants, animals, and locations in the Pacific region and notable deceased Americans and I intend to continue. Access to HighBeam would help me because it's difficult to find reliable sources on some of the topics. Thanks for your consideration! - tucoxn\talk 06:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. User:Bishonen. I've been on English Wikipedia since 2004 with some 30,000 edits and have written on English Restoration drama, 17th-century London history and Swedish history. It would be useful to have better access to stuff related to 16—18 century English social history and literature. Bishonen | talk 11:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]
    User:Sparklism. Hanging out at the English Wikipedia since 2006, I've created 100+ articles and have circa 9000 live edits. I'm mainly interested in content creation for lesser-known musicians and their recordings, and I'm pretty active over at AfD. I'd like Highbeam access to help improve some of the more obscure, pre-internet stuff that I'm working on, and to help verify stuff for AfD. Thanks! — sparklism hey! 13:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC) I don't need this right now, so I'm striking my request for the time being. I'll apply again in the future, when I really do need it. Thanks. — sparklism hey! 12:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. User:Smkolins. Since 2005, created > 100 articles in English wikipedia with 23k live edits, mostly related to religion, alittle in science. I have other accounts from other resources and this is needed for some work. --Smkolins (talk) 02:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. The Transhumanist – I've been around since 2005 (started with another account), and have edited many thousands of articles. Being able to look up and cite additional facts about article subjects would be extremely useful. The Transhumanist 00:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Awardgive (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia. I've technically been here since 2010, but started actually writing stuff in 2011. I have over 4,000 edits. Recently, I have been working on, along with my WP:USRD stuff, the first season of the TV show Psych, and artworks by Roy Lichtenstein. HighBeam access would be incredibly useful for helping with reception and history/production information for my work (Examples here and here). - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 06:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Erik (talk · contribs) I am active with film articles, which are often at the top of search engine results, and am requesting HighBeam access so I can better research film-related topics. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Martijn Hoekstra (talk · contribs) sourcing for sources for some AfC articles, verifying some others. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29. --OppidumNissenae (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC) I am active on it.wikipedia, a HighBeam account would be extremely useful in reference verification tasks. This is my edit count: [12]--OppidumNissenae (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30. # Dereckson (talk · contribs) I'm interest by an HighBeam access to work on history and religion articles on the French Wikipedia. Furthermore, in the past, I've been in situations I were unable to access US newspaper archives to properly source an article and I see HighBeam provide also access to such archives. I don't have HighBeam access. Statistics: 25K contributions on Wikimedia projects, administrator and 16K contributions on fr.wikipedia, account registered in 2005. --Dereckson (talk) 11:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Mediran (talk · contribs) I'm editing here for more than a year since March 2012. Now, I'm also active in writing film and television articles, including SpongeBob topics (which are lacking sources, including its season articles like this). I would like to have access to HB for sourcing to source/verify those articles... since most of the most reliable and worth-citing sources (i.e. US papers like Variety, Chicago Sun-Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, The Guardian) are available at HB through their archives. Thanks. Mediran (t • c) 13:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32. TheBigJagielka (talk · contribs) - I've been editing for about four years, I have made many edits and most of my edits are on historical association football competitions. TheBigJagielka (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renewal account (you had one, but it expired)

I'm in talks with HighBeam about renewing the accounts. I'll update as soon as I can. Please leave feedback about your experience using HighBeam at WP:HighBeam/Experiences. Ocaasi t | c 21:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Carolmooredc (talk · contribs) Registered since 2006 with 22,990 edits. My first 1 year is running out and would love another year because very helpful in researching political and BLP histories and events. CarolMooreDC🗽 19:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Miyagawa (talk · contribs) I've been on the English Wiki since 2009 and have more than 36,000 edits. My first year has just run out and I would like to have a further subscription as I found it very useful in article expansions and used it numerous times. Miyagawa (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Wasted Time R (talk · contribs) My one-year account just ran out, arrgh! I've used it for a number of articles, including several that became GA or FA. I've been here since 2005, have 64,000 edits and many FA/GA/DYK articles to show for it, especially in politics, history, and popular music. Wasted Time R (talk) 01:01, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Arxiloxos (talk · contribs) I've been here since June 2008 and have 16,000 edits; I've been using HighBeam extensively for the last year to improve sourcing in articles. Discovered this morning to my dismay that my year has run out. --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. JayJasper (talk · contribs) Actively editing Wikipedia for over six years and have nearly 35,000 edits. My one-year account, which I utilized often and found to be an invaluable resource in my endeavors to improve WP, has expired. I am requesting a renewal of this account in order to continue using this valuable resource to aid in the improvement of the quality and credibility of Wikipedia's content, particularly in the areas of U.S. politics, history, literature, and BLP's.--JayJasper (talk) 18:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Collect (talk · contribs) Hit the one year wall like the others -- been using it and still have a slew of edits ... Collect (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Nikthestunned (talk · contribs) Current subscription expired per above... Have found it very useful indeed so far, hope it can be renewed! Nikthestunned 10:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Resolute (talk · contribs) As with others, subscription expired. It was quite useful to me in the production of FA and GAs. I suspect Highbeam would like for us to buy subscriptions (they are in business to make money, after all), but man, $200 a year... I'd be willing to pay if we could get a Wikipedia discount. Resolute 22:37, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Cloudz679 (talk · contribs) Had the year, found it very useful, and would like to continue when possible. C679 19:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · contribs) since 2006 with 51K+ edits and found my one year Highbeam account to be invaluable resource and used it numerous times in various articles.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Viriditas (talk · contribs) editing since 2004 with 100K+ edits. Highbeam helps me write GA articles. Viriditas (talk) 04:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Markus Schulenburg (talk · contribs) HighBeam is a helpfull tool for checking articles for correctness. --Markus S. (talk) 15:49, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Crazypaco (talk · contribs) would like a renewal of my original expired HighBeam account, if possible. I have over 20K edits over six years. CrazyPaco (talk) 23:13, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Bruce1ee (talk · contribs) My one year subscription has expired. I found HighBeam very helpful and request that my account be renewed when possible. I've been on the English Wikipedia for 8 years with over 40,000 edits, including 76 DYK creation/expansion credits, 11 GA promotion credits, and many other content creations and expansions. —Bruce1eetalk 13:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Orlady (talk · contribs) also bumped up against the expiration date. I've not found HighBeam as helpful as I had hoped, but I've found it valuable -- particularly for verifying and/or correcting previously unsourced content. I'd like a renewal account, if available. --Orlady (talk) 14:02, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Joe Decker (talk · contribs) Expired, still have a use for the resource, more recently as much at AfC as AfD, and I still dabble in unreferenced BLP sorting as well. Around 40K edits, I think. This is the most effective premium resource for that sort of general source-finding that I've used. --j⚛e deckertalk 14:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. CennoxX (talk · contribs) Expired, I mainly use it for news-articles around films, it's very helpfull for magazines like the german film-dienst. I'm most active at the german Wikipedia, I've there about 13.000 edits, and I'm about 3 years active.--CennoxX (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Neatnik (talk · contribs) It appears that my account has expired. I've been editing for 2 years on fr.wp, about 2,200 edits, 75 % in the main namespace. I spend a good deal of my time searching for sources and Highbeam has been really helpful. There is a lot of good content, ranging from the folk magazine Sing Out! to The Washington Post. Neatnik (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Aschmidt (talk · contribs) I would like to renew my HighBeam account because I found it quite useful. I mostly used economics, legal, and education journals for adding references in German Wikipedia (some 27.000 edits on German Wikipedia, sysop on German Wikiversity).--Aschmidt (talk) 20:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. whpq (talk · contribs) - About44,000 edits. I use Highbeam in reviewing AFD for sourcing. A very useful resource as it contains material normally paywalled. -- Whpq (talk) 20:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Pigsonthewing (talk · contribs) Over 100,000 edits; Wikipedia in Residence at various museums and galleries. Wikipedia trainer. I'm already missing thus immeasurably useful tool. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:47, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Mandarax (talk · contribs) It's proved to be a valuable resource, so if renewals become available, it would be great if I could get one. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:55, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Sylenius (talk · contribs) Editor on fr.wp for 7 years. I've found Highbeam very useful on some occasions, especially on general or economic topics, as it contains material that you can't seem to find elsewhere, especially when you are outside the US. If available, I'd like a renewal account. Sylenius (talk) 20:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Alexander Doria (talk · contribs) 13,000 editions on the French Wikipedia since 2006. This has been quite useful to me, both in enhancing articles and checking accuracy of previously published content. Alexander Doria (talk) 22:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Critican.kane (talk · contribs) 13 editions on the german Wikipedia since 2010 (with over 600 own articles). I'm writing about american movies und biografies. I used the highbeam-account with nearly every new article (especially film critics and background-stuff) and got my first honored article (the german article to the Tv movie Stalin got an good article) - i really miss this good little highbeam-tool -- Critican.kane (talk) 23:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Silver seren (talk · contribs) I have been editing since 2006 and have 23,000+ edits. I found Highbeam to be quite useful and used it in a lot of articles. It's sad that the subscriptions ran out. SilverserenC 06:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Smalljim (talk · contribs) Wow, that year went quickly! I've found Highbeam very useful as a reference source for a wide range of articles. It's also proved handy as a quick way to assess the notability of companies, performers etc. with articles that are up for deletion. Wikipedia would continue to benefit by arranging a renewal account for this invaluable resource.  —SMALLJIM  11:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28. I've found Highbeam very useful for research on literature articles, and I'd very much like my account to be renewed. Malleus Fatuorum 16:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Armbrust (talk · contribs) Very useful, I want it to be renewed. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Editor since 2006 with nearly 100,000 articles to my credit. I find HighBeam extremely valuable as a resource and value it as a resource above anything else really aside from google books. It has allowed me to produce some GAs and some really good articles on subjects I'd otherwise not have been able to work on to that level of quality and has got me out of some sticky AFDs. It has been a fantastic research tool for me in the past year which has gone so quickly. Please renew mine as soon as you can!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Gilderien (talk · contribs) 12,000 edits, HighBeam has been very useful to me finding sources for various articles, including my DYKs and GAs. Unfortunately as a student I can't afford to fork out £200 to buy my own subscription for what is essentially a voluntary effort.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 22:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ronz (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. 72,000 edits since 2006. It's been a helpful resource for providing links to old sources and for finding new sources. --Ronz (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yngvadottir (talk · contribs) Here since 2008, 15,000 edits; I both write and improve articles, including attempting to save things at AfD, and HighBeam has really helped for paywalled newspapers, which seems to be more and more of them (including the one needed for articles relating to the closest big city). Please renew my account if possible; my local library still hasn't heard of it. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Zero0000 (talk · contribs) Editor for 11 years, administrator for most of that time, countless thousands of edits. Access to Highbeam was of tremendous value in obtaining high-quality sources for articles, and I miss it a lot now my first year has finished. Zerotalk 05:37, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Racconish (talk · contribs) Editor since 2008, over 30,000 edits. As a mediator on the French Wikipedia, I find Highbeam references very valuable in resolving disputes by content improvement. Highbeam sources have the advantage overr other services such as Proquesst or LexisNexis to give access to a snippet. Hope to be renewed. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 20:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Kmhkmh (talk · contribs) I'd like to renew my account if possible, it expired early this spring. I edit the German and English since 2007 with a total edit count close to 40,000. Highbeam has proven useful to me for extending/verifying/sourcing articles, in particular in the field of arts, biographies and contemporary history/recent events.--Kmhkmh (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Bagumba (talk · contribs) English Wikipedia. Editor for almost 5 years and over 22,000 edits. Work on sports biographies was greatly enhanced by non-free content offered by Highbeam.—Bagumba (talk) 00:15, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Albacore (talk · contribs) Over 8,000 edits and two years here on the English Wikipedia. As for the usefulness of Highbeam, look how it helped me write Mike Capel. Almost all of the non-stat references are from the site, and without Highbeam, I couldn't have written Capel's page. Albacore (talk) 14:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  39. The Banner (talk · contribs) Didn't notice that my account expired. Found it very useful and use it regularly, mostly for checking on dead links. The Banner talk 02:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk · contribs) I too didn't notice that my account expired. I find Highbeam to be invaluable in finding older reference material that I can't find through Google. Not to mention it helps me find references that were originally published as print-only, which helps me in building articles to be less reliant on Web references. I just recently passed 40,000 edits - I have helped get 3 articles to Featured Article status, and I hope to double that amount in the next year alone. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 17:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Melirius (talk · contribs) This year passed too fast, there are too many things unfinished. Highbeam is extremely useful in psychology articles. It will be nice if the subscription can be renewed. I edit mainly in Russian Wikipedia. --Melirius (talk) 19:50, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Raintheone (talk · contribs) Member since 2006, over 26000 contribs. My account has now expired. It has been one of the most useful tools and has opened many doors. I have improved various articles with the otherwise lost newspaper articles it offers. But there are many more articles to improve and another year would go a long way.Rain the 1 00:30, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Jrcla2 (talk · contribs) Found out that I can't access articles like I used to be able to when researching a new basketball player article I'm trying to write. Would like my access back please. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Liesel (talk · contribs) Member since 2005, over 50000 contribs on german wikipedia. My account has now expired. Liesel (talk) 05:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) member since 2005 and contributor to 15 FAs and over 200 GAs. My account has recently expired. Imzadi 1979 → 15:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  46. ItsZippy (talk · contribs) Have found HighBeam really helpful; renewed access would be great. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Spanglej (talk · contribs) Editing since 2009, over 20 000 edits, mostly adding literature-orientated biography content. The account was very useful for article improvement. Span (talk) 00:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Taty2007 (talk · contribs) I am an editor on the Spanish and English Wikipedia since 2008, with more than 30500 edits and some good and featured articles. My subscription expired recently, however I found HighBeam to be a very useful reference source for creating new articles, verifying resources and expanding information. Taty2007 (talk) 15:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) - around 5000 articles, 5 pieces of featured content, 21 GAs and 108 DYKs. 37,000 edits to en-wiki. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 23:19, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Softlavender (talk · contribs) 16,000+ edits to 4,000+ articles. Love research; article creation; article improvement, expansion, and verification. Editing Wikipedia since prior to 2007 (created account March 2007). Softlavender (talk) 09:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Carrite (talk · contribs) - Useful in AfD defenses and I am finding a recurring need for access to the Washington Post. Carrite (talk) 06:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  52. JuneGloom07 (talk · contribs) - I found HighBeam to be extremely useful and it helped me create and expand many articles. - JuneGloom Talk 17:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Donlammers (talk · contribs) - I have 17,000+ edits over not quite four years. Last year I was mostly doing vandal patrol and category work, so didn't use it as much as I anticipated, but it was still very useful when trying to verify information. After a few month hiatus, I am starting to edit again and refocusing on article expansion, where this service will be extremely helpful. Don Lammers (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  54. AFBorchert (talk · contribs) - I would like to renew my HighBeam account. 28,000+ edits in multiple projects, mainly focused on Ireland where the newspaper coverage of HighBeam turned out to be helpful. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) -- I've found Highbeam to be useful all through the past year as I've improved articles on film, television, and literature. I believe I'm losing access this month, and would love a renewal of my account. Ruby 2010/2013 21:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  56. M.O.X (talk · contribs) - The access to academic writings, newspapers and journals certainly helped me with fact-checking and other WikiGnome work, it would be nice to be able to access this content once again. James (T • C) • 10:40pm • 11:40, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Secret (talk · contribs) HighBeam was extremely useful on my work and improved a number of articles with it and would like to have it again. Secret account 03:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Xavxav (talk · contribs) -- French wiki user [13] with more than 4,000 edits [14]. HighBeam is very useful to complement French sources, especially on international topics. Thank you and regards -- Xavxav (talk) 13:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Trevj (talk · contribs). The HighBeam Research partnership has proved an invaluable asset to my contributions here. My access is now due for renewal, the fee for which I cannot afford to pay personally. Therefore, a further period of free access would be greatly appreciated, if this is possible to arrange. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 11:07, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  60. O'Dea (talk · contribs) I am a Senior Editor active since 2004. I have found HighBeam to be a rich and invaluable tool for fact checking and research to support Wikipedia content creation. My account has expired and I am keen to renew it, if possible. Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 18:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs) I've have racked up 33,000+ edits since February 2010. Ever since I was granted a HighBeam account this time last year, I had authored at least five articles about military and civil aviation using sources from the site. I am looking forward to a renewal so I can continue with my content creation. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 04:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Acdixon (talk · contribs) Really enjoyed supplementing the material available from my local library with what is available via HighBeam. I'm really hopeful the renewal will come through. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 16:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Lexein (talk · contribs) HighBeam account finally expired, re-applying here for a new activation code. Used it a lot, used the via= template parameter to always give HighBeam credit. --Lexein (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Dennis Bratland (talk · contribs) We neeeeeeeeeds our HighBeam back. Gives back the precious. Gives it back! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  65. RolandR (talk · contribs) useful resource; discovered it had expired when researching Soviet suppression of Zionist groups. Please restore my access! RolandR (talk) 16:14, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Grandmaster (talk · contribs) Very useful resource, could you please resume my access? Thanks. Grandmaster 10:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Bollyjeff (talk · contribs) I have very much enjoyed using this tool. It always provides better sources than a google search. I have used it on several GAs and FAs. BollyJeff | talk 02:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Fluffernutter (talk · contribs). I've used Highbeam in a number of my articles over the past year or so, and I was disappointed to find my subscription had expired when I tried to use it again this week. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Livitup (talk · contribs). I found Highbeam invaluable in participating in AFD discussions. Access to a very high quality research service like this can quickly prove if a subject is notable or not. "I searched Highbeam and found..." or "Highbeam has nothing at all on this..." is a compelling entry in a deletion debate. Thanks! Livit⇑Eh?/What? 19:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Nicola54 (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC) I still need the access for news in sports and sports history. I contributed more than 80.000 edits to the German WP until now, mostly about the history of cycling, and I work in the "Member of the House of Lords" Project in the German WP aswell.[reply]
  71. JoJan (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC) I'm active in Wikipedia since 2004 and an administrator since 2005. I have over 100,000 edits in wikipedias in several languages + Commons. My subscription to Highbeam has expired. I used it for writing articles about mollusks (WikiProject Gastropods), already 28,000 of them (but not all by me). It is difficult to get the latest news about these little creatures and Highbeam has been some help in the past year. A renewal of my subscription would be very helpful.[reply]
  72. AllyD (talk) I found Highbeam access very useful, sometimes for improving unreferenced new articles but particularly in WP:AFD discussions around whether articles meet the notability guidelines, both for improving those for which Highbeam identified sources and as a verification that there was a lack of reliable 3rd party coverage for those didn't. It would be good to have renewal of this useful asset. AllyD (talk) 06:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  73. David Eppstein (talk) I found this very useful (particularly in sourcing biographical articles to help them avoid deletion in AfDs) and would definitely re-use with a renewal of my subscription. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:35, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Kafziel (talk) This has come very much in handy and I'd like to renew. Are these renewals happening, or is everyone on this list still waiting? Kafziel Complaint Department: Please take a number 14:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  75. #Donner60 (talk · contribs) - I have used High Beam for research on several articles over the last year. I do find it useful. I also have used it to check on notability or verify information on articles for deletion or new articles. I just tried to log in and the account is no longer available so it seems to have expired before my Questia account. I have changed my e-mail address on my user page but I still have the old e-mail address used with the Questia and High Beam accounts and continue to log in with it. Thanks for your work on this. Donner60 (talk) 02:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  76. SteveStrummer (talk · contribs) HighBeam is a fantastic research tool: it's been very rewarding to me this past year and I would really love to continue using it. SteveStrummer (talk) 03:15, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Gongshow (talk · contribs) I have found HighBeam to be a tremendous resource. It has come in handy on numerous occasions; particularly for adding information/citations to previously unreferenced articles discovered at AfD.  Gong show 18:33, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Enric Naval (talk · contribs) Got access to many many newspaper articles that I couldn't read otherwise. Occasionally books that are not available on Google Books. --Enric Naval (talk) 11:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Bill william compton (talk · contribs) – I've used HighBeam extensively in many articles. I mostly write biographies for Indian personalities in sport and politics, and about historical buildings. There are comparatively few easily available sources for Indian topics. — Bill william comptonTalk 04:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  80. John Carter (talk · contribs) - Am currently working on getting together lists of missing articles included in reference sources, and some assistance in developing content. HighBeam is staggeringly useful in the latter, and I believe will be just as useful in the former, particularly for finding recent reference sources on NRMs and the like. John Carter (talk) 17:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Nelliette (talk · contribs) - I had ID code for High Beam in 2012, it is helpfull for me in the case of creating articles for wikipedia or logs which I publishing on the newspapers webs.Thank you very much. Yet, I am not receive entering code for year 2013. --Nelliette (talk) 22:54, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Snowmanradio (talk · contribs) I did not find highbeam much use for science/biology and my membership has expired, but I would like to try it again. Snowman (talk) 23:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Round 8

  1. User:Iselilja. Renewal. Mostly English Wikipedia lately, but also Norwegian bokmål Wikipedia. I write about society and politics, so newspaper articles are of high interest. I have found HighBeam especially valuable for topics from non-English speaking countries (other than Scandinavian) because there are often a draught of sources for those topics. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. User:درفش کاویانی. Renewal. My account has expired, and I would like to extend it please. im ctive in Persian Wikipedia, Tajik Wikipedia, English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia. I start editing in wikipedia since 14 August 2008. i wrote 7 featured article and 3 good article in Persian Wikipedia. I write about History and Photography. Thanks Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 15:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:TenPoundHammer. Renewal. Expired and I'd like to extend. I'm mainly active on retail and country music articles, and the Highbeam subsription was extremely useful in fleshing out mall articles. I've been editing since December 2005 and have created nearly 1,500 articles. Highbeam has a lot of information that is of great use to me. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4. User:MrX. Renewal - I have used Highbeam extensively over the past year to add references to newly created and existing articles. I have more than 30,000 edits and have created 138 articles. Thank you for your consideration. - MrX 12:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5. User:Malik Shabazz Renewal. I've been an editor since 2006 and have made more than 76,000 edits. Very helpful resource. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. User:Gobonobo. Renewal. Despite having library access to many databases, I often find myself wanting access to HighBeam sources. I intend to use access to work on historical biographies of women. Gobōnobō + c 20:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7. WhisperToMe (talk · contribs) - I have been active editor for about a decade and I would like to have Highbeam to help expand my sourcing. I do not have highbeam access from an alternate source. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 4nn1l2 (talk · contribs). Persian Wikipedia. It's the second year I'm editing on Wikipedia and of course enjoying it. I usually write about Middle East history, culture, and societies. Aside from Middle East topics, I enthusiastically edit articles on engineering and fundamental sciences. I have wrote 2 Featured article yet and expanded a whole bunch of other ones. I intend to expand my work on Wikipedia but unfortunately due to recent sanctions against Iran, I have lost my access to digital libraries. I really appreciate it if you let me have access to HighBeam. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9. User:Shalbat. Spanish Wikipedia. I have more than 24 000 edits and I have created more than 200 articles. I would like to go on with this work. --Shalbat (talk) 15:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10. User:Smsarmad Renewal, I am an active English Wikipedia user and have more than 26,000 edits. I mostly edit articles related to Pakistan, a topic area that lacks in a number of ways, one of which is availability of online sources. HighBeam is a good resource and was helpful in creating/expanding a number of articles. -- SMS Talk 10:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11. User:Mackensen Renewal. I've used HighBeam over the last year to improve our coverage of North American railroading topics. I do not have access from an alternative source. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 13:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12. User:Czar. enwp. History of education, art, and video games—mostly content expansion, new articles, but also source verification. I've hit the paywall dozens of times in the last year and my institution doesn't have HB access. My research time spent would be greatly improved with access. czar ♔ 13:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13. User:Apwoolrich I am an independent scholar, interested in C19 industrial history and biography. Just now doing intensive research into Rees's Cyclopaedia Apwoolrich (talk) 06:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Doc Taxon (talk · contribs): I am active in en:WP:REX and especially active in its German sister project de:WP:BIBA or de:WP:BIBR. I am looking for articles and literature for all the users who need it and for myself, to build well researched articles in English, German and Wikipedia of other languages. Thank you, -- Doc Taxon (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15. User:Blackberry Sorbet. Interest lies largely in articles that often predate the commonality of the internet and access to HighBeams digitized archives of older print publications would be extremely useful in sourcing material as well as opening avenues for new articles which might otherwise fall by the wayside for lack of access to sources. BlackberrySorbet 18:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16. -jkb- (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC) dewiki, cswikisource, etc.; renewal needed for research in quite difficult themes (Czechoslovakia - History, Eastern Europe, etc.), thanks, -jkb- (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17. User:Aalfons Renewal. 19.000+ edits since 2007. dewiki, meta, relevance check, research support for other wikipedians. --Aalfons (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18. User:Thoughtfortheday Renewal. I have found some of the publications (often behind a payroll) very useful, for example for classical music content. I hope to introduce the resource to other wikipedians. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Jason Rees: I have found some of the materials useful, so i would love to renew this account if at all possible.Jason Rees (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20. User:Dougweller Renewal I spent a lot of time finding source for articles on archaeology and history, and this has been very useful for me. About 107,000 edits. Dougweller (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21. OwenX (talk · contribs) Renewal. Made good use of the service to dig up citations. Would love to continue. Thank you! Owen× ☎ 21:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22. GrapedApe (talk · contribs) Renewal Really enjoyed the first year of the account, would like to do more. Over 4 years, have totaled 18,000 edits, 344 articles created, 4 Featured Lists, 5 Good Articles, and 18 DYKs. Typically edit articles in Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities, Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh and Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Future research interest is in fleshing out unique locales in Pittsburgh and expanding stub articles of historic places in Pennsylvania.--GrapedApe (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yoninah (talk · contribs) Renewal The service was very helpful for accessing archived articles on Jerusalem streets and architecture, and Jewish subjects and personalities from around the world. Another one-year subscription would be ideal. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Bbb23 (talk · contribs) Renewal. English Wikipedia. I use it often in sourcing issues when an Internet link is not used in the reference. I have over 50,000 edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25. ssriram_mt (talk · contribs) New .English Wikipedia. I am part of wikiproject India and Hinduism and need higher reference sources. I have 18 GAs and more than 60,000 edits. I need the account for archived articles for either of the projects i am part of.Ssriram mt (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Khazar2 -- Renewal. One of the top 100 Wikipedians by edit count, have contributed to 40-50 Good Articles in the past year. I used Highbeam almost daily for its encyclopedias, reviews, and newspaper articles. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Go Phightins! -- Renewal. Highly useful for research on sports articles ... would really appreciate a renewal on my account. Thanks! Go Phightins! 00:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28. OppidumNissenae -- Renewal -- I wrote about news 500 entries in some Italian VDQ is of medical interest and more, I think HighBeam is a valuable resource.OppidumNissenae (talk) 00:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29. DCDuring. Most active as admin at English Wiktionary. We constantly need to attest to usage in a wide range of subject areas. One of our particular weaknesses is in coverage of terms used in contemporary workplace, especially other than computing. That in turn is partially attributable to lack of access to trade press, not well covered at Google or other free sources. English Wiktionary is an important resource for other wiktionaries. DCDuring (talk) 00:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Roisterer (talk) 01:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Active member since 2004 with 22,000 & a bit edits, a couple of GAs and lots of article creation and editing, all of which would be greatly improved with a HighBeam subscription.[reply]
  31. Froid (talk) 08:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC). I meet the requirements and will fulfill expectations. Highbeam will enhance my contributions to Wikipedia; I've long wanted access, as when conducting research for the purposes of contributing or verification of preexisting content, I frequently encounter sources for which a subscription is required. My stats: # Froid (talk) 08:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC). First edit Sep 09, 2006 / Unique pages edited: 7,401 / Live edits: 20,734 / Deleted edits: 0 / Total edits (including deleted): 20,734.[reply]
  32. billreid -- Renewal as per my previous application. Thank you. --Bill Reid | (talk) 09:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33. KrakatoaKatie Active English Wikipedia admin with around 20K edits - I mainly work on biographies but I often find great articles to improve, in many different subject areas, while doing admin work. It would be a great help to have access to the Highbeam database. :-) KrakatoaKatie 10:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Harrias -- Renewal -- Very useful for sports articles research. Harrias talk 13:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Esoglou -- I think HighBeam would be very useful both for adding new material and for checking attributions. Esoglou (talk) 19:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36. User:Enric Naval. Renewal I have successfully used Highbeam to locate newspaper articles for Mother's Day, cold fusion, crop circles and others. I intend to use HighBeam to keep locating old newspaper articles as necessity arises. Enric Naval (talk) 16:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Rlendog. Renewal - 50,000+ edits, over 100 articles created. Work on a number of projects, including mammals, music and sports. Useful for looking up information in old newspaper articles. Rlendog (talk) 19:58, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Mayooranathan -- New --I am an active Wikipedian in Tamil Wikipedia for 10 years now. I started more than 3,500 articles and improved many more. Highbeam access will be very usefull for me in the above work. Mayooranathan (talk) 09:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ryoga Godai -- Renewal --My subscription expired this August. I edit music articles and anime, manga articles. Highbeam is a really useful source for old newspaper articles that are not usually found on the internet. A renewed subscription would really help me. ごだい (会話) 12:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ca$e (talk). Renewal. I found HighBeam very useful. I work - currently with > 40k edits - on a range of topics esp. in philosophy and religious studies and am, among other things, involved in the respective editors' forums in the german WP. Ca$e (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  41. SchroCat. Renewal: great source, and I now find myself struggling without it. - SchroCat (talk) 03:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Queeste Mostly active on the Dutch Wikipedia, less on the English. Especially interested in the psychology and psychiatry journals, in addition also history and religion. --Queeste (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Amqui Contributor on several Wikimedia projects, but would use this access mainly to contribute on the French Wikipedia where I wrote more than a dozen Good Articles, created more than 1,000 articles, and have more than 20,000 edits in the mainspace. I write on a lot of different subjects, including but not limited to anthropology, botany, ethnology, geography, history, religions and zoology. Amqui (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Tyrol5 -- Renewal. Great resource. I've worked on several historical U.S. election articles and having access to historical news articles is invaluable. Great to have access to journal articles as well when I dabble into the U.S. space program, etc. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:44, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  45. User:Hack. Renewal. Used this mostly for researching biographies on historical sporting figures. Hack (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  46. John M Baker. New. English Wikipedia. I work on articles about finance and about words and phrases, and I contribute to the Reference Desk and the Resource Exchange. Although I have access to some other databases that I use for the Resource Exchange, I do not have HighBeam access. John M Baker (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Doug Coldwell. New. English Wikipedia. I work on articles about colonial people of the United States. I have about 300 Did You Know articles and over 20,000 edits. I do not have HighBeam access and believe it would give good biographical information.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Acather96 - New. I've been an editor on Wikipedia for nearly four years with 29000+ edits, would find access to sources extremely useful(especially if they include information on plants). Acather96 (click here to contact me) 20:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  49. User:HueSatLum – New. English Wikipedia. I write about just about everything and find paywalls extremely frustrating. I believe HighBeam would provide more and higher-quality sources for writing better and more accurate articles. Cheers, ~HueSatLum 18:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Spanglej Renewal Editing since Feb 2009, around 22000 edits, mostly literary biography content, 12 new biogs. I had Highbeam access for a year through WP and found it mighty useful for biog research and GA development. Span (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  51. User:Sagaciousphil New English Wikipedia. I'm a fairly slow and ploddy editor in comparison to most but I like working on historical information; I do have access to some databases through my library card and I pay for Questia myself. I feel High Beam would greatly enhance the sources available. SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Diannaa Renewal; access would be useful for copyright investigations. Thanks, -- Diannaa (talk) 01:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Quadell (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia. I've been a Wikipedian for nearly eleven years. I am very active in reviewing Good Article nominees, Featured Article candidates, and Articles For Creation. I frequently spot-check sources given by content creators. It would be very useful for me to be able to check sources that HighBeam would provide access to. – Quadell (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Ponyo (talk · contribs) My old account has expired and my access to prime library sources has ended; I'd certainly appreciate a renewal in order to carry on with BLP sourcing!--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:41, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  55. RL0919 (talk · contribs) Over 8 years and more than 21K edits. I've written and expanded a number of articles about people, books, and plays from the 20th century, topics for which HighBeam should have useful source material. I'm long past university, and my local library has several other databases but not HighBeam. --RL0919 (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  56. User:Jack Greenmaven. English wikipedia. I have done a lot of copyediting and created several articles. I have been editing just over three years and have an edit count of 22,000. Greenmaven (talk) 05:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  57. EMP (talk · contribs) Renewal; editing since Sept 2009. I've had Highbeam access for for the past year and have found it most helpful in my research to update and improve multiple articles.EMP (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Michig (talk · contribs) - frustratingly as I was about to use HighBeam to improve an article I find that my account appears to have expired and I'm now asked for payment - renewal would be much appreciated. --Michig (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  59. VVVladimir (talk · contribs) - editing since 2007, mostly in the history and culture of the Balkans. I helped promote several FAs and GAs, and intend to continue this work. Vladimir (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Hobbes Goodyear (talk · contribs) - My initial one-year account has expired--I would like to renew. With Google News archive out of commission, I think that having Highbeam access has become even more important. I just created a new article on a subject where references are tough to come by, and there are two on Highbeam I'd like to include. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  61. EricEnfermero (talk · contribs) - Renewal; on English WP for about two years, >11,000 edits. I focus largely on content creation, particularly related to biographies in sports, psychology and medicine. HighBeam has been helpful in expanding articles, including successful GA nominations. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 05:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Grolltech (talk · contribs) - Renewal; Have enjoyed using HighBeam over the last year, as I have found it to be very useful. I had a whole bunch of articles staged for use – I just added one the night before last, went to bed, but by morning the account had expired. Hoping all of that good research I've accumulated wasn't for naught.  —Grollτech (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Jeremy112233 (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia. I have spent 2-3 years editing Wikipedia and focus most of my attention on content generation. All of my reference use full citation information, which helps users to verify the information I add to the encyclopedia even if they do not have access to the pay-site's articles. Most of my articles require a large amount of research as they deal with contemporary issues where the sources I need are often behind paywalls rather than available freely on Google's reference searches like Scholar or News. That said, they just changed the Google News search so the old Archive function is no longer available, providing even less good sources to create articles. My articles are largely on law, medical, or entertainment related people or firms, and Highbeam would make my articles better researched, and allow me to create articles on subjects I may otherwise not be able to. I do not currently have ready access to HighBeam through either a university or a library. Jeremy112233 (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Lwarrenwiki (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia. My first edit was in Aug. 2013, and I have been quite active since then, with over 500 edits. If you have any flexibility in your requirements, I would very much appreciate being able to access your resources with a free account. I am diligent in providing detailed citations to references, and it's clear to me that HighBeam can allow me to provide higher quality in my editing and will greatly enhance my research. My areas of interest are listed at User:Lwarrenwiki, and I have seen that HighBeam covers (for example) major city newspapers with reporting of music-related events, as well as music criticism. I fully expect that I would be using HighBeam regularly for greater quality. I do not have other sources of free access. I respectfully request your approval for a free account. Thanks for your consideration. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC) - updated 05:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  65. CaroleHenson (talk · contribs) - renewal, per talk. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  66. User:Tokyogirl79 - I'm a frequent flier at AfDs and other deletion type scenarios, but I frequently find myself in situations where I need to check older articles that are not visible on the Internet. I edit mostly film and book related articles, but I also edit articles on various other topics that could predate news coverage on the Internet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  67. User:Storye book. I've been an editor here for 9 years; I've created over 50 DYK articles including one GA, and a load more of created or expanded articles. A lot of the articles are on buildings, structures and people, plus other historical subjects; all are fully cited. I have contributed over 2000 own-work and archival photographs to WP and Commons, and am listed as an auto-patroller on Commons. I do have access to certain online databases, mainly via my local library membership, but this tends to be limited to UK databases, - so Highbeam, for example, would expand my research worldwide. I'm currently working on an article on a 19-century church, with associated biographical articles, including artists of the Arts and Crafts movement. --Storye book (talk) 09:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  68. TheBigJagielka (talk · contribs) - I've been editing for about four years, I have made many edits and most of my edits are on historical association football competitions. TheBigJagielka (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Bearcat. Active in new article creation and referencing improvements, predominantly in the areas of Canadian politics, LGBT topics and Canadian and international film, TV, music and literature. For a long time I wasn't sure if this project would actually be useful to me or not, but nowadays I quite frequently run into HighBeam previews in the course of trying to track down sources, so I figure I may as well give it a shot. Bearcat (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  70. User:Brianhe. Active Wikimedia project: WikiProject Motorcycling. Have added HighBeam to many articles (with credit of course), my account apparently just expired. HighBeam used for a variety of research on vehicles, biographies and miscellany. -- Brianhe (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  71. User:Kopiersperre. Active Project: de:Wikipedia:Redaktion Chemie. 6000 edits there.--Kopiersperre (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  72. User:Krimuk90. Renewal. I have been the principal contributor to 3 featured articles on Indian film artists. The Highbeam tool enabled me to find a lot of references, something that is otherwise difficult due to limited sources available for older Hindi film articles. A renewal of my account would significantly help me continue editing other film-related articles. Thanks. --krimuk 90 04:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  73. User:Aviados. Renewal (my access expired in 04/2013). I'm a 6-year editor with a significant contribution to the Hebrew Wikipedia. Active mainly in content generation and research. Created and/or substantially contributed to thousands of articles. Aviados (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  74. I had HighBeam access for a year, before my user name change from user:Malleus Fatuorum, and I found it very useful. Eric Corbett 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  75. User:TParis, I'd like to work on articles relating to Ford Island.--v/r - TP 21:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Seeking renewal,   — C M B J   13:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  77. User:Rhododendrites. English Wikipedia, Commons (but far less frequently). Plenty of experience adding substantial content to articles, checking references, adding references, etc. I'm an active Wikipedia user as well as a grad student researching Wikipedia and encyclopedias. Thanks very much. --— Rhododendrites talk |  02:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  78. User:Gaurav Pruthi Had used Highbeam for citing various articles earlier. Hope to get my subscription renewed.Gaurav Pruthitalk 09:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  79. User:ColonelHenry. Mostly on the English Wikipedia, although I do translate English content into Farsi for that project. As of March 2014, almost 17,000 edits, several FAs and GAs (listed on my userpage), I generally focus on content creation and improvement especially towards articles on poetry, literature, historical biographies, regional history and historical places/landmarks, looking to expand my work into theology and botany. Often I get an odd urge to edit an article I happen to come across randomly, and with access to more tools, I would do that more often. I would be honoured to have access and make good use of it and would gladly help other editors looking for certain journal, newspaper, or other resources.--ColonelHenry (talk) 07:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  80. User:TransporterMan. English Wikipedia. I do dispute resolution and am the second most active volunteer at 3O, the most active at DRN, and a member of the Mediation Committee. Access to sources is useful in sorting out content disputes. This is a renewal application, my prior account having expired some time back and I not realizing that it was possible to so easily renew. — TransporterMan (TALK) 17:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  81. User:Racconish. English and French Wikipedia (where I am an active mediator). Over 48,000 contributions to Wikipedia projects. This is a renewal application. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 18:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  82. User:MrBill3. WP:WikiProject Medicine, WP:WikiProject Citation cleanup, WP:WikiProject Nursing, WP:WikiProject Skepticism. Formatting refs on hundreds of articles, adding archive versions of refs. Adding and improving refs on many articles. Verification of references on many articles. Adding content and refs to a significant number of articles. Top ten contributor to medical articles in 2013. Contribution of content to articles on scientists and skeptics. I am a very active editor. I use the resources I have access to extensively, the addition of HighBeam would help me verify references and improve my ability to contribute content and sources as well as provide sources for existing content. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Dezastru (talk · contribs). English-language Wikipedia editor since January 2012, with 3,000+ edits. Most of my contributions involve American history, politics and current events, and biographies. My local library recently eliminated online access to archived news sources due to budget cuts, which has substantially limited my research options. Dezastru (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  84. User:Shakehandsman Editor since 2006 with over 11,000 edits. Working on Wikiproject British Crime articles including creating a good article almost single handedly. Also work on politics, biographies, and football. I often add refs for unreferenced material. I intend to continue the same work into the future and would really benefit from access to additional sources that Highbeam provides.--Shakehandsman (talk) 08:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Frank Schulenburg. Editor since 2005 with more than 39,000 edits across languages and projects. Wrote 17 featured articles so far and a number of good articles. I'm mostly active on the German Wikipedia, but I'm doing my research in French, English, and German. Most of my featured work was on biographies (17th and 18th century). I agree to the conditions above. Thanks in advance, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  86. User:Caponer. English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons (as Justin.A.Wilcox). I write biographies of notable West Virginians, and histories of West Virginia buildings and populated places. -- Caponer (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  87. User:97198. English Wikipedia. I write biographies about, amongst other things, filmmakers and more recently mountaineers. I plan to continue creating and expanding biographical articles. 97198 (talk) 09:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  88. User:Dainomite. English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Biographies relating to modern United States military history. I plan on continuing to write/expand said biographies. A few of the biographies I am working on have key in-depth articles which seem to only be accessible through HighBeam. Thanks for your consideration, —  dainomite   19:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  89. User:Dumelow. English Wikipedia. Applying for renewal of my previous account. It has proven useful on occasion in sourcing material for new articles - Dumelow (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Dank. 60k edits. I expect the journals listed here to be quite helpful. - Dank (push to talk) 17:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  91. LuckyLouie. Editor since 2006, and would appreciate this very useful tool for sourcing article content. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  92. User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. 60K edits. Use for content verification, especially BLPs, and for creating/expanding articles about 1940-70s genre fiction, which has become much more difficult with the unavailability of the Google News archive functions (not that it was easy even with them.) Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  93. User:Jamesx12345. Working at the moment on a variety of articles, many of which involve contemporary history. Jamesx12345 18:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Kober. I have been active since 2004, made nearly 40,000 edits on English Wikipedia, and wrote more than 1,200 new articles. My principal interests are the history, culture, and politics of Georgia, the Caucasus, and the Middle East. --KoberTalk 18:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Dom497. I have been active since 2011 and have made over 11,000 edits. I work largely with Amusement Park related articles. I used to be able to find news articles through Google Archives which provided articles from almost a decade ago. I used these article to get several roller coaster articles to the GA or FA level. Google has since removed the archive feature and is now hard to find news archives. I've done a few searches on some roller coasters through the database (you search without an account, just can't read them) and found lots of articles that would really help.--Dom497 (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Paul Benjamin Austin. I have been a registered user since July, 2002 and was an administrator until i resigned in frustration at POV pushers. I feel that i can source information that could improve articles. Paul Austin (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  97. User:EtienneDolet. I have over 14,000 edits. I have made at least 200 articles. I really need new databases to sources. Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  98. User:Samwalton9 I have over 5000 edits, been active for a little over a year, and would find this very useful for sourcing information for women scientist biographies which I am presently writing a lot of. Sam Walton (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  99. User:Glane23 I have edited Wikipedia since 2008 and have made over 46,000 edits. I now work mostly on adding/improving references for articles across en:Wikipedia and this source helps immensely. Geoff Who, me? 21:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  100. User:Demiurge1000 I have over 23,000 edits, have been active for nearly 4 years, and have made significant use of HighBeam references (including appropriate links) in a previous one-year use of the scheme. I would like to continue and enhance this usage going forward. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Justlettersandnumbers: Not had access to this before, so don't know exactly how useful it would be in the areas I'm interested in (Renaissance topics, music theory, art history, history and traditions of agriculture). I'd be pleased to have the chance to find out. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Epipelagic I have have been active for 8 years and have 50,000 edits. I mainly develop articles related to marine ecosystems. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Levdr1lostpassword 3 years, 13K+ edits. I focus mainly on radio. HighBeam would prove invaluable in sourcing content on this particularly volatile medium. Thank you for your consideration. Levdr1lp / talk 23:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  104. magiciandude Editor since 2004. Main focus is on Latin music. Erick (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Mrschimpf re-application; have found Highbeam to be a valulable resource to source articles, especially among media and older television and radio programs. Nate • (chatter) 23:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  106. DendroNaja I have been a member for over a year, have well over 1400 edits, have promoted at least 5 or 6 articles to GA status, I am mainly interested in venomous snakes, snake venom, toxinology, psychology and pharmacology. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 04:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  107. SMcCandlish (talk · contribs). Renewal. Wikipedian for 8+ years. I have a degree in anthropology and applied linguistics, but am not a professional academic so I don't have journal access any longer. My main journal needs are in life sciences (felinology, herpetology, commercial animal breeding, history of domestication), anthropology/archaeology/history (e.g. history of sport), and various other topics (I'm a major contributor to articles on albinism, linguistics, and other subjects that require citation of peer reviewed sources).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  13:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  108. groupuscule. I'd be well pleased to get in on Highbeam, as my local library offers only limited news access and my typical contributions are detailed accounts of historical events from the semi-recent past. Aloha, groupuscule (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  109. User:Anita5192. I correct, enhance, document and sometimes create mathematics articles. I will use the HighBeam resources as references to verify undocumented principles. – Anita5192 (talk) 02:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  110. User:Anne Delong I review articles at Afc and frequently come across Highbeam articles that I can't see to check notability of the submissions. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Egghead06. 29k edits in nearly seven and a half years. Being in the retirement years (!) I focus a lot on sportspeople, sport and music not of current times. I believe Highbeam would be extremely valuable in providing references pre-internet or from the early years of the internet era.--Egghead06 (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  112. Connormah - 50,000+ edits - frequently I write or edit articles on historical figures, and find myself digging up newspaper archives frequently. This would help a great deal. (I believe I had access a few years back, FWIW) Connormah (talk) 05:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  113. Shoebox2 -- 2500+ edits, one FA, GA reviewer. Don't have access to HighBeam anywhere else, and given that I have several media/performance articles on obscure subjects that I'd like to expand, would find it immensely helpful. Shoebox2 talk 11:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  114. This is Paul – 60,000+ edits, 10 GAs, 4 FAs. I had HighBeam access in 2012–13 and found it very useful, so thought I'd reapply. I mainly edit articles concerning UK media and politics from the recent past, as well as some crime-related stuff. This is Paul (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Toa Nidhiki05 - Just under 12,000 edits, as well as a fair amount of good and featured content. I had HighBeam access maybe a year back, and I didn't realize I could renew; I found it very useful for research, and would love to have access to it again. Toa Nidhiki05 15:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  116. Valenciano (talk · contribs) I've made over 27,000 edits in total and created over 330 articles here and around 30 on other Wikipedias. My main interest is in creating and adequately sourcing articles related to politics and history. I live in a country without library access to Highbeam. Valenciano (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Emeritus (talk · contribs), global: since 2006 up to 22k/21k edits serving de:WP, german WP; generalist, long-term projects include history of academies and bio-bibliographies of academians, Pacific affaires, Brazil affaires, art, literature, ethnography. Positive experiences with HighBeam. --Emeritus (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  118. User:JonRichfield. In the past four years or so I have done well over 3000 edits, and a fair proportion of my work has been on articles that I initiated. Most of the topics that I deal with are substantial, plus many RFCs (no groupie celeb touting for example). Most of my work is in a wide range of scientific and technical matters, particularly biological and computing, though I deal with a certain amount of historical and philological material as well. I am not familiar with HighBeam resources, but it sounds extremely valuable for some kinds of data search for up-to date citable material. A good proportion of my work is in dealing with "citation wanted" texts, so my requirements for reputable citations is atypically high. I am retired and cannot often reach the local university libraries and it is not clear to me that the HighBeam resources would be available there even if I could. I do not apply for any material benefit to myself nor to any third party, commercial or otherwise. In short, if I find that HighBeam resources are appropriate to my work, I not only would be able to put them to good use, but would in the process be publicising their value in good faith and without reducing their market value. I remark that I am thoroughly aware of my responsibilities in protecting the interests of the publisher. Thank you for your attention. JonRichfield (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  119. KevinCuddeback (talk · contribs). 1600+ article edits since 2005. Recent edits have focused on adding sources by using NYTimes scanned archives and LATimes for example at Greyhound Lines (I'm most active in "corporate" and "transportation" themes). Would use a broader set of publications and would like better coverage of the 1980s and 1990s (pre-free-internet). KevinCuddeback (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  120. User:Carriearchdale I have been on Wikipedia since 2007 and currently have over 2700 edits globally over all the wikis. I am interested in having access to Questia to help in my work to expand and verify articles in several different interest areas including biographies, linguistics, literature, classic antiquity studies, the arts, and education. I do not have access through local libraries since I live in a quite rural type setting. Thank you for your consideration.
  121. Cerevisae -- I would like to renew my High Beam account. I have 1460 edits over 4.5 years period. My subjects of interests are Malaysian politics and Bitcoin related subjects. High Beam database is extremely helpful to me because I can utilise the archived news sources for a more reliable citation for my edits. Cerevisae (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Siawase (talk · contribs) Editing since 2006, over 10 000 edits, mostly active in content generation/improvement in culture and biographies and would use Highbeam to that end. Siawase (talk) 07:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Carlstak (talk · contribs) I've made over 6,000 edits since August 2011 and have created about 15 articles, including some quite long ones, on historical subjects and biographies. I am especially interested in Spanish subjects, and in translating articles from the Spanish, Catalan, and Portuguese Wikipedias. I also spend much time adding quality sources to articles. Highbeam resources would be very useful to my research. Carlstak (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Dan arndt I've been editing since 2006, with over 23,000 edits in that time. I've predominantly been working on Australian related articles, covering topics such as Australian musical groups, Australian comic book artists, Australian architecture/heritage buildings and Australian architects. Numerous times I've been frustrated at the lack of credible and reliable sources to cite in articles, particularly newspaper references which can only be accessed with a Highbeam account. Having readily available access to Highbeam would enable me to verify numerous known but un-cited facts in many of the articles I've edited or would like to create.Dan arndt (talk) 13:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  125. User:Peter Flass I have made over 5000 edits since 2008. One of my interests is computers and technology, and I believe Highbeam would provide an extra resource. Peter Flass (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Neonorange (talk · contribs) I've been an active user over the past year, and have begun to add content to articles in three areas: American novelists, the American Civil Rights Movement, and the American anti-war movement. I have paid access to The New York Times, The Economist, and Foreign Affairs. Better access to research materials would greatly strengthen my ability to contribute well cited Wikipedia content. I worked as a journalist and documentarist for many years. I no longer have access to a broad range of research tools. Though I live in a major metropolitan area, my local library is very small, and I have no access to academic libraries. I've worked in more than 35 US states and more than 35 countries and territories. With proper research material, through HighBeam, I can make use of my personal experiences to locate WP:RS to back up contributions to Wikipedia. - Neonorange (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  127. User:Aditya Kabir I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, and have made over 18,000 edits. The biggest problem I face is a lack of access to quality sources.
  128. FireflySixtySeven (talk · contribs) I am active in content creation; having access to more sources would be very useful when I write/translate articles. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 19:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Keresaspa (talk · contribs) I have made over 16,000 edits and am coming up on my tenth Wikipedia birthday. My main areas of content creation are the Northern Ireland Troubles, far right politics and, to a lesser extent, football and I believe my edits in all three areas would benefit greatly from access to Highbeam. Keresaspa (talk) 02:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) I have made over 25k edits in two and a half years on en WP, and have contributed to quite a bit of Featured content. I work in WWII Yugoslavia topics and there are a lot of resources accessible through High Beam that would make a big difference to the breadth of sources I could use to develop articles. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:25, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Clarityfiend (talk · contribs) Over 90K edits on anything that catches my fancy, but my main interest is films. I found my last Highbeam free access useful from time to time. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  132. OscarLake (talk · contribs) I've made more than 2000 edits here on Wikipedia, mainly on film-related articles and biographies. With the help of Highbeam, I'd be able to provide high-quality sources for my work. OscarL 12:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  133. SPECIFICO (talk · contribs) I will use this access primarily to improve content and reference citations in articles concerning and relating to economics. SPECIFICO talk 13:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Gene93k (talk · contribs) 26,000+ edits in article space since 2007. I would use Highbeam access for verification in the clean up of articles. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Funandtrvl (talk · contribs) I would like access to HighBeam because I frequently clean up refs and add refs to many articles. I have found that many of the news articles that are cited in WP require HighBeam access, since they are often older news articles, and are no longer in a free archive online. It would be very helpful to be able to read the whole article that is used for a reference. Funandtrvl (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Ceyockey (talk · contribs) This resource would come in handy in battling linkrot and in enhancing company articles, two areas I have been active in over the past couple of months. If there is a need to relinquish access to allow others to access after a period of time, like a month or two, I would be happy to pull back and allow another to 'have a turn'. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Vejvančický (talk · contribs) This is re-application, my previous one-year account expired in April 2013, I guess. This is my 7th year of active editing on Wikipedia, I have more than 40,000 contributions (more here). I used HighBeam search mainly during my work at CAT:CSD, Special:NewPages and WP:AfD. It could be more than useful now, when Google News Archive is defunct. Thanks for your consideration. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Taketa (talk · contribs) - Writer since 2008 and started 6500+ new articles on the Dutch, English, German and West-Frisian wikipedia. 40.000 edits. I use alot of media as sources and I think access to Highbeam would be very usefull to me. I also work as bureaucrat for the Dutch Wikipedia and OTRS-member in general, and I can use sources during this work as well.
  139. Blarcrean (talk · contribs) - Contributed to Wikipedia as originator of pages mainly on Southern African subjects and editor of existing articles since 2009, modest 2300+ edits. Limited access to library resources in a remote region; would value access to HighBeam resources.
  140. ssilvers (talk · contribs) - Since 2006 I have created hundreds, and edited thousands of pages on Wikipedia, especially about musical theatre and comic opera, but also about the environment, the Victorian era and a variety of other topics; I come across HighBeam articles in my searches and would like to be able to access them. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  141. Fraggle81 (talk · contribs) Requesting renewal of HighBeam account, I use the resource for fact checking potential vandalism edits in combination with STiki. I am in my 7th year on Wikipedia and have over 58000 edits. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  142. WilliamJE (talk · contribs) Editor since 2006 with over 40,000 edits. I fact check sports articles and actor biographies alot....William 22:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  143. Jeff in CA (talk · contribs) Since 2005 I have been active in content generation, research and verification. I will use this access primarily to improve content and reference citations in articles concerning and relating to sports history, geography and border studies. I had formerly relied heavily on the lamented Google News Archive. Jeff in CA (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Hmlarson (talk · contribs) I've been most active on articles related to women's history and sports in the last few years. I will be using HighBeam to further develop articles in these areas. Thank you.
  145. User:HopsonRoad 02:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC) I've recently worked on pages for Bob Perelman and Laszlo Fejes Toth and see that High Beam offers sources for these people that would be valuable in these articles and for future and past projects. Special:Contributions/HopsonRoad[reply]
  146. CZmarlin (talk · contribs). I have been contributing to WP for several years with thousands of edits, as well as preparing some new articles and "Did You Know" nominations. My focus is on articles about automobiles and Poland. I frequently check and improve references in many WP pages in a variety of topics. I have also found WP articles with High Beam references that are not accessible. These most often refer to newspaper and magazine articles. I would use this service not only to check the validity of exiting citations within WP, but more importantly, to help improve WP articles and develop new ones. Thank you! CZmarlin (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Trivialist (talk · contribs) I have been an active editor since 2007 with over 60,000 edits. I edit articles in a variety of areas, and would use HighBeam for content generation, research, and verification work. Trivialist (talk) 23:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Ryūkotsusei (talk · contribs) Trying to complete List of million-selling game consoles. I'm not too pleased to find out some sales information is locked behind $1000 business reports so I need to try every other resource possible. « Ryūkotsusei » 02:14, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  149. Alaexis (talk · contribs) I mostly work on the history of Caucasus (both recent and ancient) and medieval Russia so having scholarly sources would be very helpful. Alæxis¿question? 12:32, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Red Phoenix (talk · contribs) I'm an active contributor in the field of video game consoles and the video game industry predating the current era. My specialty area deals with Sega and its past consoles. These articles oftentimes have holes for which internet articles fall short and period-based sources archived through HighBeam would be useful in fleshing out these articles and generating more quality content. Red Phoenix let's talk... 13:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Gourami Watcher (talk · contribs) - Active since 2009 with 5,000+ article edits and created around thirty articles. I have strong interests in archaeology around the world as well as crime in the United States. With a lot of my subjects of interest, it is sometimes fairly difficult to find reliable if not any sources at all. With access to HighBeam, I will more than likely find enough suitable information.--GouramiWatcher(?) 19:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  152. User:Matthiaspaul. Being a long-time proponent of the idea of building and sharing knowledge, I'm contributing to (mostly the English and German) Wikipedia since 2006, and since 2010 under this account, which has accumulated 19,000+ edits meanwhile. I have a broad scope of interests from arts, music, literature (passive and active) to philosophy, ecology, geology, journalism to various fields of sciences and technology. Professionally, I'm into hardware and software research & development. Therefore my main areas of expertise and consequently of activity here evolve around topics of computer sciences, electrical engineering, physics, and photography, including many history of technology themes, which I find particularly important to preserve for generations to come. While I have a large personal archive/library myself, it is still sometimes difficult to find suitable references, in particular for older and more special stuff. I am not familiar with HighBeam yet, but it sounds like it could help to conveniently fill this gap, therefore I apply. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Jerem43 (talk · contribs) - Been an active member of EN WP since 2006 with 36K+ edits. I often edit restaurant-business related articles, and several main sources such as Nation's Restaurant News use HighBeam as their archival source. These articles were at one time free, but are no longer. Access to HB would make my editing so much easier. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 05:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Tucoxn (talk · contribs) I would like a Highbeam account if one becomes available. I've been editing on English Wikipedia since 2008, but I also edit on French Wikipedia, Fijian Wikipedia, and Simple Wikipedia. I am mainly a researcher and content creator. I currently have over 6,000 edits on English Wikipedia, with over 3,900 unique pages edited and nine non-redirect articles created. When I create a new article, I try to have it listed on the main page, at Did you know? I've also created several articles on Fijian Wikipedia. I write articles on plants, animals, and locations in the Pacific region and notable deceased Americans. I intend to continue a similar pattern of editing. Access to Highbeam would help me because it's difficult to find reliable sources on some of the topics and the libraries in Fiji, where I live, are difficult to access and not well stocked. Thanks for your consideration! - tucoxn\talk 09:47, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  155. SnowFire (talk · contribs) - Active editor since 2006. Have used newspaper articles from Google News before for articles like Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Would use the access for an eclectic range of articles. SnowFire (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Timmyshin (talk · contribs) - A member since 2008, I edit mostly pages on East Asian history and entertainment. I think an English-language news archive would help me greatly on some of the Asian entertainment articles that I'm interested in. Timmyshin (talk) 14:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Strike Eagle (talk · contribs) - Have been editing since 2011 and have ~10k edits including 5 GAs and 12 DYKs...mostly edit articles related to Indian military....older articles are rare to find usually and I see highbeam library seems to have many of em. Will be greatly helpful. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 15:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) In four years of editing Wikipedia, I have contributed 28,000 edits, including a number of featured lists and good articles. I would use these resources to expand and improve coverage of sources used by articles in the field of military history - primarily those dealing with the breakup of Yugoslavia.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  159. Mkdw (talk · contribs) I already have access to HighBeam and place my name here only in the need of reaffirmation or renewal. I am active in the WP:AFD process and often use reference material in determining notability and improving articles that can be saved. My general areas of interest are biographies and neologisms though I have been known to write about other topics such as articles about cities, industries, or companies. I have a fairly lengthy history on Wikipedia as indicated on my account meta data. Mkdwtalk 19:06, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Edward321 (talk · contribs) I have been on Wikipedia since 2006 and have over 22,000 edits. While recent edits have been largely verification, I would add more content if allowed to use Highbeam. My areas of interest are history and historical biography, with specific interest in 15th Century Europe and western Asia, as well as the mid-19th century. Edward321 (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  161. Star Mississippi (talk · contribs) user and admin. I work most frequently in museums and historic sites, whose values are frequently discussed behind scholarly paywalls. StarM 02:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  162. Patrickneil (talk · contribs) since 2005 I've used High Beam for its historic articles, often to source topics like sports or academics from before 1980. Just this week I found an article from 1906 that I could only see a summary of, but might be able to get the full text with High Beam.-- Patrick, oѺ∞ 14:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  163. Atama (talk · contribs) User and administrator, editing since 2006 and an admin since 2009. My interests vary widely, I often get involved at articles where there is a dispute or some other controversy. HighBeam's articles make it easier to find sources for articles when I'm trying to determine if they are eligible for deletion (through WP:PROD usually, but I do WP:AFD discussions on occasion). I also help out with conflicts of interest issues (especially at WP:COIN) and being able to find independent sources can be challenging. -- Atama頭 21:04, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  164. Mike Searson (talk · contribs) User and coordinator of the knives and firearms projects. I have been active since 2006 and have 26000 edits. I am always looking for high quality source material.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  165. GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) Editor for 7 years with just under 20,000 edits. I have been primarily active in professional wrestling, with quite a few edits to other topics. In wrestling, it can be hard to find reliable sources, so this would be a very valuable resource. I would also like to expand into some baseball biographies and would find this a very helpful resource. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  166. ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 440,000+ edits, 40+ GAs - High Beam would be great for gathering more information on historic properties. Previously used it to add many citations and built out some key pages through its sources. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Kmzayeem (talk · contribs) I have been editing in Wikipedia since May 2012 and made over 9000 edits so far with almost 80% of them being in the mainspace. My prime interests have been the articles related to culture, arts, music, history and economy of Bangladesh and South Asia in general. Apart from content creation, I have actively participated in the verification of numerous existing articles as well as saving several articles from deletion. A free access to Highbeam's online resources would help me a lot to do the works more effectively.--Zayeem (talk) 08:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Fleetham (talk · contribs). Most active writing about Chinese car firms but also have an interested in economic- and foreign policy-related pages. I would use Highbeam as a complement to news searches though Google News and to gain access to material that's behind paywalls. Fleetham (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Aichik (talk · contribs). Been an editor since 2007, and looking to increase edits on Asian American figures and American women artists.--Aichik (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Ἀλήθεια (talk · contribs) I have been an editor for more than 6 years with over 1,100 edits int he mainspace. I am actively involved in creating pages for notable theologians and biblical scholars. Since many of these people pre-date the internet, a lot of this information is locked away in academic journals. Having access to Highbeam would help locate better sources. Ἀλήθεια 14:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Ehrentitle (talk · contribs) I have been on Wikipedia since 2005 and currently have nearly 2000 edits and created two dozen articles globally over all the wikis. I am interested in having access to HighBeam to help in my work to expand and verify articles in several different interest areas including military biographies as well as US and German Military history. Ehrentitle (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Pokey5945 (talk · contribs) I have over a thousand edits since 2005 (and more under my previous user name). My Wikipedia work focuses mainly on American social movements and their leaders, some music articles, and various other random articles that catch my interest. I've created five articles across my two user names. Highbeam is a first-rate source for accessing journalistic and scholarly sources, and would be very useful in my editing endeavors.Pokey5945 (talk) 20:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Coretheapple (talk · contribs) I have over 8,000 edits in my two or so years at the project and have eclectic interests, ranging from the Chicano labor movement to early Broadway theater. Until recently I had ProQuest access and was happy as a stuck pig. Without it I could not have created Johnny Broderick. But that has ended so I now drift forlornly through the Internet, which inevitably fails me as much of what I seek is pre-Internet. HighBeam would be tremendously useful in my content endeavors. Coretheapple (talk) 22:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Iñaki LL (talk · contribs) Hi, I am an English wikipedia editor, occasionally on the Basque, French and Spanish ones also. Editor since January 2008 with 3,300 edits. I work on areas related to Basque language, culture, geography, and history—text, pictures, and maps. I also have a handful of worldwide and Basque specific pictures uploaded in wikicommons. I find little on English sources related to these topics, and often based on Spanish references. A good part of my contribution so far came down to bridging information gaps and fixing inaccuracies. While I have attempted to gain access to English language journals, I find many or most of the papers are (frustratingly) restricted. Iñaki LL (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Scalhotrod (talk · contribs) Hello, I am an editor for English Wikipedia active since 2007 with over 5,500 edits. My interests (along with the articles that I have edited) run the gamut from subjects such a science and technology, living and non-living historical and political figures, celebrities and other types of BLP articles, firearms and related subjects such as the History of Gunpowder and Gunsmiths, music and entertainment subjects, adult and human sexuality related topics, and the list goes on. I am also a subscriber to SuggestBot service and routinely expand into areas not in my regular patterns or habits. I am always in search of credible and quality references and request access to this tool. Best regards, --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  176. AntanO (talk · contribs) Hi, I have been on Wikipedia since 2011 and currently have over 1300 edits in English Wikipedia and over 16200 edits in Tamil Wikipedia. I'm interested in history, biography, science, etc. Online resources would be very helpful in order to improve the articles with reliable citations. --AntonTalk 00:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Makyen (talk · contribs) Editor since 2006; 5,800 mainspace edits. I am active in content verification. I routinely read/check references to verify that article text is consistent with the cited reference. I also perform a considerable amount of citation data verification (i.e. citations accurately describe the reference in a way that allows a reader to obtain the reference for verification. While my primary interest is technical, I do this on a wide range of articles. — Makyen (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC); add join date, # mainspace edits. 02:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  178. Esoxid (talk · contribs) I am active in biology related articles, and would use access for paywalled journals/articles. Esoxidtalk•contribs 18:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  179. FeralOink (talk · contribs) I have 1800 edits on en WP, also do content verification on others. I focus on business and technology, including BLP's and Afc review. I often find excerpts of HighBeam news stories when searching. I would really appreciate full access, not just tiny snippet previews! HighBeam is a great reference source, especially since Google News Archive is mostly gone.--FeralOink (talk) 02:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Iketsi (talk · contribs) Active editor on multiple Wikipedias since 2010 with over 3,000 edits on enWP. I would be thankful for an access to scholarly resources that would help me improve articles by adding reliable citations. --Iketsi (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  181. Jax_MN (talk · contribs) Active editor on Wikipedia since 2009. I've made over 1,900 edits, often to biographies (living or deceased), to the Freemasonry project, to topics relating to fraternal groups and many more. I'd use the HighBeam resource for more accurate referencing. Jax MN (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Madalibi (talk · contribs) – I have over 11,000 edits on Wikipedia since 2008, mostly on East Asia. I lost access to all databases when I finished my PhD in 2010, and I have lived in China ever since, far away from accessible libraries. I buy a lot of books, but sorely lack access to academic journals, newspapers, and magazines. I would use the Highbeam database to find reliable content and keep building articles that last. Madalibi (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Judae1 (talk · contribs): I am an active editor and I enjoy research, and tend to look for references to enhance wiki articles in need of assistance. Access to this would be helpful to see the full articles and not just the initial graph to see whether it is a valid source for an article. Juda S. Engelmayer (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Kurator71 (talk · contribs): Active editor on German Wikipedia since 2011 with over 21,500 edits and 200+ articles. I focus on art, architecture and biographies and would use the access for new and existing articles. --Kurator71 (talk) 09:38, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Manxruler (talk · contribs): Active at en.wikipedia since 2005, more than 37,000 edits on the project since then, mostly on history-related subjects. 5 GAs and 68 DYKs. Manxruler (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Acabashi (talk · contribs): I have used Jstor, Project Gutenberg, and Archive.org over the past 7 years, and I believe that Highbeam would be a useful adjunct for my mainly church, place and biog (historic) article creation and additions. Thanks.
  187. MichaelQSchmidt (talk · contribs), Project Film coordinator with 49,000+ edits over 6+ years, will use highbeam archives to source articles on older films per WP:NOTTEMP. Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:12, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  188. WAVY 10 Fan (talk · contribs): I have been actively editing since 2006 in multiple areas with over 6000 edits; mainly focusing on everything from sports, pop culture, media, religion among other topics while creating 44 articles. My goal with HighBeam access would be mainly to improve articles pertaining to various media articles; especially improving media articles for the Hampton Roads region. -- WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  189. RashersTierney (talk · contribs): Interested particularly in Ireland and Romani-related topics. Would like to renew to check references, especially archived articles from the Irish Times ('paper of record') which is subscription. RashersTierney (talk) 21:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Matty.007 (talk · contribs): I am a fairly regular creator of articles, some historical ones, some more recent ones. I feel that both these needs would be satisfied by using HighBeam (as an aside, can this get The Times?). Thanks, Matty.007 16:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Carlstak (talk · contribs) I've made over 6,000 edits since August 2011 and have created about 15 articles, including some quite long ones, on historical subjects and biographies. I am especially interested in Spanish subjects, and in translating articles from the Spanish, Catalan, and Portuguese Wikipedias. I also spend much time adding quality sources to articles. Highbeam's resources would be very useful to my research. Carlstak (talk) 00:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Oceanflynn (talk · contribs): I've made 6925 edits in 5 projects since 2006. I often contribute to articles related to Canada, including Canadian history, First Nations, human geography, physical geography, etc. I created articles such as Caribou and Boreal woodland caribou in 2013. (There was an attempt at creating an article entitled caribou, years ago but it had been merged with Reindeer which then became overburdened with North American content. The article I created included much content, some new images and many new references with inline citations.) Because of paywalls. etc, I am often unable to access robust online references that would be invaluable in a Wikipedia article to which I am contributing. My academic background includes graduate studies and sessional lecturing in the Social Sciences. Highbeam was recommended to me by Dianna (talk · contribs). oceanflynn 19:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Mion (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005, 17 k edits, article creation, updating and fact checking mainly, dentistry and energy related articles.
  194. MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) - I edit articles across the board, whether it interests me or not. Highbeam would be useful to me when locating sources for articles that are nominated for deletion. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  195. PresN (talk · contribs) - 33000+ edits since 2006, active in video games and literary awards, will use highbeam to look up articles in newspapers, newswires, and magazines for content creation/improvement in those areas. --PresN 21:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Kaldari (talk · contribs): ~50,000 edits over 10+ years. I work a lot on history-related articles and a Highbeam account would be extremely useful for digging up obscure sources. Kaldari (talk) 22:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  197. Geo Swan (talk · contribs): I have been active on the wikipedia for almost ten years, and I have started over 2,000 articles, on a wide variety of topics. If I am granted access to high-beam I'll start by going through those 2,000 articles, and bringing all references to high-beamed versions of articles up to current citation standards. Geo Swan (talk) 23:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Sturmvogel_66 (talk · contribs) Former MilHist coordinator, editor since 2006, over 300 GAs and 50 featured articles and lists. I would like access to fill out my articles on ships, battles, and airplanes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  199. EuroCarGT (talk · contribs) I edit tech related articles, access to tech-related resources that HighBeam offers would be very useful. ///EuroCarGT 03:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Bagumba (talk · contribs) Renewal requested, as it's been a wonderful resources for researching sports subjects.—Bagumba (talk) 07:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Gordo (talk) 07:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC) Would use for historical research, through newspapers.[reply]
  202. Dolovis - I am active in researching mostly biographical articles (sports bio and others) and am often looking for newspaper articles to support biographical information. Access to HighBeam resources would be extremely helpful. Dolovis (talk) 13:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Dream Focus I used my Highbeam account quite a lot when I had it previously, before it ran out. I would like to have that sort of access again to be able to reference articles in need, as I did quite a lot of before. I have edited Wikipedia for 7 years, 11 months and made over 26,000 edits. I am active in the Article Rescue Squadron helping find sources for articles before they get deleted for lack of having them. Dream Focus 15:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  204. These days I've been mostly writing articles about topics of local historical interest. Having access to old newspapers would greatly help me out with this. If given access I would also be willing to be active on Resource Exchange. (Since everyone else is giving it, I've been an editor for about 7 years now, my edit count isn't high, though high enough for the requirements, but I do a lot of public outreach these days). Just recently I had a new Wikipedian ask me to help him verify a paywalled resource. I would love to be able to check Highbeam for these sorts of things as well. Zell Faze (talk) 20:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Ravenswing (talk · contribs) Editor for nearly ten years and 39,000+ edits. I had Credo and Highbeam accounts last year, which proved very useful in sourcing for articles in threat of deletion, and in expanding biographical articles. Ravenswing 21:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs) Been bouncing around about 9 years. I spend a lot of time hunting sources for my own work and on behalf of others, for origination, expansion and for verification and have had to make requests at WP:RX for material this would allow me to access directly. Approaching 80K edits (by X's counter) and just had my third featured article promoted. I do not have access to this database through my local library or otherwise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Smerus (talk · contribs) - can I renew please (after a gap)? I mainly edit articles dealing with music, history, and countries of the former Soviet Union.--Smerus (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Technical 13 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). I'm fairly well known as a templateFu/JavaScript guy, but I also spend a fair amount of time reviewing AfC drafts and being able to save some of the drafts I come across that are short a reference here or there using this resource would be a great benefit to the project. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:56, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  209. X96lee15 (talk · contribs) – I have been active on Wikipedia for 8 years and have over 40,000 edits. I'm focused on sports and also cities and other subjects in the Midwest. I'm excited to potentially have access to newspaper archives for historical topics. I've recently been interested in adding references, cleaning up and and resurrecting dead links. — X96lee15 (talk) 19:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Correogsk (talk · contribs) I am a psychologist interested in doing sleep research (insomnia, specifically: I tried twice to obtain a PhD in that area: I will try it for the third time soon); I am also a certified English-Spanish-English translator of official documents and vicepresident at Wikimedia México, A.C., and am doing research about the history of science in Mexico and about some specific institutions: El Colegio de México, A.C., UNAM and Consejo de la Crónica de la Ciudad de México, A.C.--Correogsk or Gustavo 06:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Sky Harbor (talk · contribs) I'm a long-time Wikipedia editor with over 12,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, and a further 6,500 on the Tagalog Wikipedia. HighBeam has a good archive of Philippine newspapers, which will be be very helpful while working on Philippines-related articles. :) --Sky Harbor (talk) 07:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  212. Loginnigol (talk · contribs) Active editor for a couple of years on English and Dutch language Wikipedia. Over 7000 page edits. Contribute editing in many areas but particularly arts, science, religion, music and sports, all of which are areas that I very much need such a high quality resource archive like HighBeam. —Loginnigol (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  213. TGCP (talk · contribs) I often want to reference special information only found in restricted access articles. HighBeam can provide me with that access to magazines like Design News, The Engineer, and Rotor & Wing. I have created a few well referenced articles such as Paul Bevilaqua and Slowed rotor, and my contributions number over 3,000, mostly related to aviation and energy. TGCP (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  214. Auric (talk · contribs) I often use Highbeam to reference news articles that cannot be found any other way. Having access to the full articles would really help me.--Auric talk 18:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  215. FormerIP (talk · contribs). I had highbeam access through WP previously, but it has lapsed. I used it less than I expected to in content creation, but used it quite a bit on noticeboards and talkpages, for example by providing people with improved cites for info they wanted to add but didn't have a good enough source. Formerip (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  216. I have been an active editor since November, 2006 and have 992 edits as of the time of this note. I do not have access to JSTOR through my local library or University and frequently write or edit on topics which are covered in these journals.My areas include classical music, sociology, psychology, literature and related topics.Canticle (talk) 09:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  217. kvng (talk · contribs) I work in audio, networking and other technical articles. Also in WP:AFC, WP:AFD and WP:ORPHANAGE where search is required to establish WP:N. Had HighBeam before and used it regularly but it expired. ~KvnG 18:04, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  218. codrinb (talk · contribs) I frequently contribute to archaeology and history articles, and having access to HighBeam would allow me to source these articles using academic papers and books on the mentioned topics.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Dwpaul (talk · contribs) No current access to HighBeam. As reviewer/rollbacker, would use to verify citations and/or add them to uncited edits to articles on a variety of topics. Dwpaul Talk 02:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  220. User:Trident13 (talk) 8years active, 100k+ edits, 700+ new articles, UK based and in constant need of new sources for both new articles and improving the quality of existing articles. Previously had access which was an excellent and immediate improvement source for creating far better articles, but let it lapse on (incorrect?) assumption that it just ran out. Since the pay walls keep going up and the resultant free access sources going down, this is a great initiative and a huge bonus for article quality. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  221. In ictu oculi (talk · contribs) I would find Highbeam useful for use sourcing references in religion, classics, Judaism, classical music and Polish history articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  222. ג'יס (talk · contribs) I mainly contribute to judaism, music and history articles on the HE wikipeida where i have been activr for 4 years. Thanks.
  223. Designate (talk · contribs) 10 years active, largely American politics and history. —Designate (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  224. Hamiltonstone (talk · contribs) editing about 8 years, 20K edits. Mostly working on art-related subjects; would benefit from access to recent newspaper review articles.hamiltonstone (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Orser67 (talk · contribs) edited for the last couple years and have made over 3k edits. I'd like to use High Beam to work on US politics-related articles, esp. articles from the 20th century (and earlier, if possible). Orser67 (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  226. NinjaRobotPirate (talk · contribs) I would like access to HighBeam to expand obscure or older film-related topics that freely available sources do not study in depth – in particular, older film reviews, especially for direct-to-video and limited releases. I have about 6K edits and created 75 articles since 2007 (mostly in the past 1.5 years). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  227. Harryzilber (talk · contribs) Editing and writing on a variety of articles I tend to concentrate on technical and historical subjects, including biographies of scientists and inventors, both distinguished and obscure. My toughest project was on Matthew Piers Watts Boulton, inventor of the aileron, due to a paucity of information on the scientist, resulting in a research period of over a year. I'm currently over 11,000 edits. Best: HarryZilber (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  228. SteveStrummer (talk · contribs) I've had HBR before and I'd be very grateful to be able to continue. I've linked HBR resources in many articles: the newspaper and journal references are particularly good for contemporary topics. SteveStrummer (talk) 02:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  229. EMP (talk · contribs) I had Highbeam last year and found it very useful in my work with articles on holistic health, finance, sports, and used quite a few refs from it. Would appreciate having it back again. EMP (talk) 17:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  230. Syfuel (talk · contribs) I have been here for more than six years, with more than 2000 edits to my name, mostly on Malaysian music scene and artists. I would like an access to HBR because most of articles that I have created created depend so much on online sources, and HBR appears to have many articles that I found to be useful as references. SyFuelIgniteBurned 08:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  231. John Cline (talk · contribs) I had HighBeam, found it quite useful, and miss having it.—John Cline (talk) 05:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  232. AmateurEditor (talk · contribs) I have been active since 2009 with about 3000 edits. I am interested in Highbeam for sources on political science and history. AmateurEditor (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  233. CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) I have been here for slightly more than one year, with 3,800 edits. I will use HighBeam for finding and adding impact for hurricanes, and history for Mississippi and Ohio roads.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  234. 12george1 (talk · contribs) I could really use HighBeam. I registered as a user almost six years ago and I have made nearly 21,000 edits. Primarily, I am an active member of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones and research information for hurricanes, both contemporary and historical.--12george1 (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Orangemike (talk · contribs) - Renewal after inadvertent lapse; editor for about a decade, admin in the English-language version; find you invaluable for historical articles (my specialty).
  236. Hell in a Bucket (talk · contribs) Apply, I've written almost 100 hundred articles focusing on history, geographical locations and notable places of interest. This will also help in afd and new page patrol as I can help check adequacy and verifibility of claims. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  237. khamar (talk · contribs) - Apply for use in Todays Articles for Improvement. I am also active in recent changes patrol and improving articles related to scientific method and skepticism. Kyle(talk) 04:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  238. iantresman (talk · contribs) First application. Have edited for about a decade with 20,000+ edits, and contributed to good articles such as Bradwall, Cerne Abbas Giant and Lobster (magazine). Tend to edit articles in science, politics, and biographical. Would like help to do more.--Iantresman (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  239. The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) - Renewal with apologies. I have a serious need for contemporary news reports on my ongoing series of The Boat Race articles. I have pre-1959 covered and post-1999 covered, but have a massive gap in the middle. I've made over 100k edits over 9 years. Any further queries I'd be happy to respond to, any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  240. jodosma (talk · contribs) I'm a WikiGnome, continually coming across dead links and want the process of finding good links less time consuming. I'm sure that Highbeam would be a very useful resource which I might use to get rid of a lot of dead links. Jodosma (talk) 07:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  241. Keithbob (talk · contribs) Renewal I'm a content driven editor with 40,000 edits. I like to create, expand and save articles. I use High Beam almost daily. Last time I let my HB account expire and I took several months to get it back, so I'm being proactive this time. -- — Keithbob • Talk • 13:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  242. SounderBruce (talk · contribs) - Apply for first-time subscription. 6 years of experience with over 11,000 edits, mostly for use with WP:USRD/WA SounderBruce 03:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi SounderBruce, you don't appear to have a valid email enabled - could you please do so? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria:, I've enabled email from other users. Sorry for the delay. SounderBruce 07:37, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  243. TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) – This is my first application for HighBeam. I have been a content editor since June 2009 and would like to use HighBeam research to help research news articles for past tropical cyclones to help create, expand, and refine articles on these subjects. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi TheAustinMan, you don't appear to have a valid email enabled - could you please do so? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nikkimaria: - I've enabled email from other users. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 16:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  244. Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) - mainly active in history and equine articles. While I do tend to work mostly in medieval topics, I also dabble in many other local history type articles and this would be helpful for me. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Wtmitchell (talk · contribs) - I'm an active editor in a wide range of topical areas -- probably most active in articles about or mentioning the Philippines. I also do a lot of anti-vandal work using WP:Huggle. All of that often involves to looking for sources to support or refute unsupported content added to articles. I'll use HighBeam as a tool for locating sources. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  246. User:Mabalu Mabalu - my main focus is fashion and textiles articles, incluidng biographical articles, but I do edit generally across Wikipedia depending on what I come across, focused on both creating new articles, and verifying & sourcing existing ones. Often it is difficult to find material due to the nature of fashion writing online (many blogs, bumft, and non-RS) so I think Highbeam would be VERY helpful for me here with providing good sources and citations. Mabalu (talk) 15:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  247. User:The Drover's Wife The Drover's Wife - I'm primarily interested in Australian history, and there's a number of journals on HighBeam in particular that I'd love to get my hands on. I don't have journal access by any other means, so on a number of topics (labour history being one I just found a thrilling amount of content on) I could do much more work with this access. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  248. User:BsBsBs Active for years, mainly on car-related topics. BsBsBs (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  249. User:Davewild Would like to get HighBeam access again, which I had from 2012 to 2013 when it was very useful. Mainly active in elections and also on AFDs. Davewild (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  250. User:Imzadi1979, active for over 6 years in content related to highways and road transportation in the United States, specifically Michigan (Highbeam has a lot of Michigan newspapers since the parent company is based here.) My account through the Wikipedia Library has apparently expired. Imzadi 1979 → 23:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  251. User:JackofOz: When researching articles, I have often been frustrated to find a tantalising High Beam first page online but am unable to read further. I am very active, mainly in the the area of classical music. I have well over 100,000 edits and have initiated many hundreds of articles. Thanks. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  252. User:SL93 I would like HighBeam access to research content for expanding and writing articles, as well as search for sources in AfD. I'm active in AfD, DYK, and article creation/expansion. I had to take a break for a while for my education with only edits here and there, but I am now able to contribute like I used to. I have thousands of edits and my account has been open for a few years. Edit- I might have add account assess Wikipedia before. SL93 (talk) 00:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  253. User:MeegsC I'd like to renew, please! Active since 2007, primarily writing about biological topics. MeegsC (talk) 01:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  254. User:BlackCab: I have written and edited many articles related to Jehovah's Witnesses in terms of sociology and their beliefs and activities, including corporate business activities. I am also contributing to a food-related article, which relies extensively on scientific papers to which I would like access. I have been active on Wikipedia since 2006 with almost 10,000 edits. BlackCab (TALK) 02:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Torchiest: I'd had access to HighBeam from September 2012 to August 2013 and used it to reference a huge number of borderline BLPs. I'd love to renew after a year break. I anticipate referencing more BLPs, as well as old media like music and video games from 1980s and 1990s, for which online sources are scant, and some science-related articles here and there. Thanks! —Torchiest talkedits 04:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  256. User:Wifione I am active in AFDs and would like to spruce up articles that can be saved from AFD with reliable sourcing. HighBeak would be helpful in that. Thanks. Wifione Message 08:32, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  257. User:GliderMaven I am active in technical areas relating to flight, motors and electric motors, and I wish to better reference and expand these types of articles. HighBeam should help with that quite a bit.GliderMaven (talk) 16:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  258. User:Laszlo Panaflex I've been editing for several years, especially active the past two years, about four thousand edits. Most of my work concentrates on medieval history pages, as well as on figures from the University of New Mexico administration and sports. A broader research resource would be most helpful to my work. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  259. User:Anupmehra - Well, my Wikipedia user account is more than a year old, and it also has more than 10,000 edits. I'd love to have free access to HighBeam, because it'd be helpful in multiple ways, as such, in saving notable articles from afd, adding citations and creating new articles, all in turn to expand horizons of encyclopedia. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  260. User:Calidum - Having access to high beam would allow me to find references for articles I'm interested in, particularly for topics related to U.S. politics and New England. Calidum Talk To Me 22:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  261. The Whispering Wind - Google News is becoming increasingly ineffective for identifying sources relating to schools and other education articles and such articles risk being deleted not because the sources do not exist but because they are not accessible. HighBeam has good coverage of the relevant articles and access would assist me in developing articles. The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  262. User:Lfstevens - Hi. I have edited more than 10k articles. I am a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. My substantive edits focus on batteries, materials science, genetic engineering, marine subjects and Hawaii. Many of these are poorly cited - Highbeam would be a big help. I have started 50+ articles on such subjects. Thanks!
  263. User:Msnicki, Active in AfDs, often searching for sources to support notability. I have been active for just over 8 years and have a bit over 6,600 edits. Msnicki (talk) 05:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  264. User:Sionk, almost 35,000 edits under my belt, I'm active in a variety of areas, including creating and improving articles, reviewing articles at AfC and participating in AfD's. I'd be delighted to have access to some of the quality paywall news sources, rather than the usual selection of tabloids! Sionk (talk) 11:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  265. User:I am One of ManyI have been an editor since December, 2012 with over 20,000 edits and over 30 DYKs. I create a variety of articles ranging from NRHP articles to biographies, science, and documentary film articles, all requiring access to newspaper articles. I am One of Many (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  266. User:IronGargoyle. 60,000+ edits. I hope to use this for articles on an assortment of DYKs, but my primary focus will be articles on amusement parks and roller coasters. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  267. User:Paulscrawl Editor over 10 years, also reviewer, specializing in carefully adding high-quality citations to existing articles, though I've also created a few. Looking to add more articles as availability of reliable sources for local history permit. Interested in adding High Beam to repertoire for revitalizing dormant Project New Orleans, a city undergoing major structural and cultural changes post-Katrina, as well as adding newsworthy citations to assorted topical articles that pass my way. Thank you for providing this great resource! Paulscrawl (talk) 18:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  268. User:Zambelo Zambelo - I'm primarily active in New Religious Movement-related articles, which suffer from a low amount of scholarly sources. I would improve these articles and increase neutrality by providing a greater range of quality references. Zambelo; talk 04:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Zambelo, you don't appear to have a valid email enabled - could you please do so? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  269. Oldbeeg (talk · contribs) I find myself creating and editing academic and writer articles. HighBeam information would be very useful. Best, Old Beeg ··warble·· 03:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  270. Danimations (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I'm keen to use Highbeam's resources to expand and create content on natural history and industrial history subjects. I have done this to some extent already with freely available journals and Australian newspapers from Trove, and look forward to expanding my range of sources to include Highbeam texts. Danimations (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  271. Rikster2 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I had a Highbeam account but believe that it has lapsed. I have been a WP editor since 2006 with 55,000+ edits and have created over 400 full articles. I work primarily on basketball articles and have an interest in filling in historical figures that this access would greatly help. Rikster2 (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  272. Prioryman (talk · contribs) I also had a Highbeam account from 2012-13 but it has lapsed. I've been an editor since 2004; I've made around 50,000 edits in that time and have created numerous FAs and GAs (see my user page for a list). Highbeam would be very useful in helping with my main areas of focus (mainly history, archaeology and related topics). Prioryman (talk) 20:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  273. AB01 (talk · contribs) I'm active in Hindi film and Hindi film actors' articles. It is sometimes hard to find reliable sources to back up information, which is why I would like a Highbeam account :-) AB01 I'M A POTATO 03:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  274. User:JRPG I have been editing since 2005 and read the on-line versions of the BBC + Daily Telegraph, Guardian and Independent UK newspapers -all wp:Suggested sources daily. My interests include astronomy, archaeology, geology and politics. Whilst Highbeam would be a useful addition for politics, it is essential for science topics where the free on-line sources aren't good enough. JRPG (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  275. K8 fan (talk · contribs)I have previously had a Highbeam account, and have used it to add a number of references to Wikipedia articles. I would like to continue to do so. Thanks. K8 fan (talk) 03:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  276. 28bytes (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I have edited here for several years, with around 25,000 total edits. I have created 100 or so articles, and access to HighBeam would be valuable for expanding those articles and building new ones. 28bytes (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  277. Ohconfucius (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) With nine Wikiyears and around 250k edits under my belt, I have significantly contributed to 400 or so articles including 20 GAs and 1 FA, access to HighBeam would be valuable for general sourcing of articles. -- Ohc ¡digame! 01:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  278. Shrike (talk · contribs) I am active in middle eastern topics, the access needed for source verification and addition of new material --Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 04:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  279. varnent (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Would like to utilize the access to find citations for otherwise difficult to cite information in LGBT articles. --Varnent (talk)(COI) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  280. Zeorymer (talk · contribs) I am looking to improve content development and reference citation on articles related to Portugal, a section of Wikpedia that is lacking in-depth exposition, or credible resources. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  281. Blackknight12 (talk · contribs) I am primarily active in Wikiproject Sri Lanka and currently working on historical political and judicial articles. I have come across useful articles in HighBeam, however I currently do not have access.--Blackknight12 (talk) 03:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  282. دالبا (talk · contribs). I am an active contributor on Persian Wikipedia with nearly 29,0000 edits and over 400 articles. I hope that having HighBeam access will help me in finding reliable sources for creating, expanding, and improving articles on Wikipedia. Dalba 16:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  283. Gareth E Kegg (talk · contribs) I found my HighBeam account extremely useful over the past year, and would greatly appreciate its renewal to help with sourcing of biographies.Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  284. 2T (talk · contribs) - I'm active since 2005 with +90000 edits in TH WP - 2T (talk) 22:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  285. Bogger (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) — I will use it for articles relating to Ireland (including Northern Ireland). Bogger (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  286. Wolvesweb (talk · contribs) — I am active in sports editing - over 7,000 edits to date over 6 years - and finding good online references for related news events predating Year 2000 is always particularly tricky, and believe High Beam would prove a good resource in this. Wolvesweb (talk) 20:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  287. Worldbruce (talk · contribs) My maintainence efforts bring me in contact with a wide variety of articles that need work on their verifiability and sources. A Highbeam account could make that work more efficient and allow me to help more articles more thoroughly.Worldbruce (talk) 04:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  288. Prokaryotes (talk · contribs) I'm interested to look up various topics during researching content edits. I made like 5000 edits in the English and German Wikipedia. prokaryotes (talk) 14:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  289. JGHowes (talk · contribs) Have created or significantly contributed to numerous FA and GA on a wide variety of topics. HighBeam access would help in utilizing additional reliable published sources.  JGHowes  talk 20:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  290. The Discoverer (talk · contribs) I mostly edit topics related to India, Catholicism, and science. I hope to use these resources to improve the historical perspective of articles. The Discoverer (talk) 12:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  291. Chewbacca2205 (talk · contribs) I'm mostly active in German Wikipedia with somewhat around 10,400 edits. There, I mostly write about video games. I would like to have such an account for finding reliable sources about older games and software. --Chewbacca2205 (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  292. Themeparkgc (talk · contribs) As my username suggests, I generally contribute to theme park articles. Wikipedia articles on amusement rides, roller coasters and amusement parks that opened more than about a decade ago really don't have great sources (if any at all). I previously had access to a resource similar to HighBeam where I was able improve several articles on older rides to GA status. Themeparkgc  Talk  08:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  293. OppidumNissenae (talk · contribs) In 2013 I was one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. This is my: edit count; my interests are medical topics and other. Thanks! OppidumNissenae (talk) 09:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  294. Farrtj (talk · contribs) I am currently ranked in the top 2500 most active Wikipedia editors and have created 16 Good Articles. I am heavily engaged in writing and researching business articles, and many of the sources I would like to use are on HighBeam. Tom (talk) 11:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  295. Masssly (talk · contribs) I am actively involved in several Wikimedia projects. My main interests include creating and improving Africa related content and the use of Wikipedia in Education in Africa. I am an M.Sc. Statistics candidate and my thesis is intended to assess the perceptions of professors and students in higher education and attempt to measure their confidence on the use of Wikipedia as a reference medium as well as a research or learning tool. (A case study of Ghana-West Africa). —Sadat (Masssly)❤Talk☮C☺Email☯ 14:14, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  296. Toohool (talk · contribs) I had a HighBeam account that expired, and I found it very useful for my work on articles about casinos and the gaming industry. Toohool (talk) 22:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  297. Jacqke (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Such a common occurrence: I am pursuing a very relevant reference for an article online only to find it is JSTOR and I cannot read the reference. I write biographies and also musical history oriented articles. The article Mandore (instrument) is an example. Access to online academic research archives would help me by allowing me access to better quality references.Jacqke (talk) 20:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi User:Jacqke, this is to apply for HighBeam, not JStor. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  298. درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) 44,000+ edits over 5+ years. I'm active in Persian Wikipedia, Tajik Wikipedia, English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia. I start editing in wikipedia since 14 August 2008. i wrote 7 featured article and 3 good article in Persian Wikipedia. I write about History and Photography. Please renew my account. Thank you Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 18:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  299. Softlavender. Senior editor, all kinds of subjects, focused on content creation, citing and research, so my wiki Highbeam account has proved invaluable over the past 2 years. My current wiki subscription expires on October 3, 2014, so can you please renew my subscription? Thanks so very very much. Softlavender (talk) 09:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  300. Yamaguchi先生 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am an editor since 2005, and am interested in utilizing this service to help provide sources for articles that need them. Thank you for consideration. Yamaguchi先生 15:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  301. Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Having been inactive during the last six months, I'm looking to renew access to HighBeam to source aviation articles. 38,000+ edits since 2010. Sp33dyphil (talk) 13:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  302. AllyD (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email): My HighBeam account just expired. I make frequent use, both in locating and adding references to improve articles and in checking notability for discussions at WP:AFD. AllyD (talk) 17:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  303. Neatnik (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Hi, my account has expired and I'd like to renew. I'm editing on frwiki. Neatnik (talk) 21:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  304. Nikthestunned (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Account expired, still an active editor and page creator etc. Thanks, Nikthestunned 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  305. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Account Expired and I would like to renew it .It has been very useful resource. 62K edits Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  306. Mendaliv (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I use a lot of newspaper resources in adding to and providing references for a variety of articles in numerous fields. I have made good use of Newspapers.com in this vein. One of my growing areas of interest is in articles on legal cases and related articles. I have over 29,000 edits. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 14:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  307. Arxiloxos (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email). HighBeam has been a valuable resource, especially in finding sources for article source improvement and for establishing the notability of topics brought to WP:AfD. My account has apparently just expired and I would like to renew it. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  308. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Used to have this but it seems to have expired. Would like renewal for news section. Content creation.[reply]
  309. User:Liesel I would like renew of the account.
  310. Bloonstdfan360 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I am active at the U.S. Roads WikiProject, where I mainly edit articles on highways in Oregon. Having access to HighBeam would help me on the history of highways. --BloonsTDFan360 (Park and Ride) 22:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  311. Wasted Time R (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) I use Highbeam frequently for articles about U.S. politics and history, technology companies, and popular music. I have about 120 FA/GA/DYK credits. My account seems to have expired earlier this month and I would like a renewal. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  312. Miyagawa (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Just realised that my account has expired. I'm involved in content creation, mostly television/pop culture topics. But I generally run a Highbeam search through any article I work on. Miyagawa (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  313. Taty2007 (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My account expired recently. I usually edit articles on Spanish Wikipedia and HighBeam has been a very useful tool to do research, to verify content and to expand articles. Thanks Taty2007 (talk) 03:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  314. Thibbs (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) My account expired a few years ago and I didn't renew since I had gained free online access via my University, but I've graduated and I would like to use the service again. I mainly edit articles on video game topics and I plan to use HighBeam to find sourcing for obscure topics in this area. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 12:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  315. CennoxX (talk · contribs · central auth · count · email) Expired, I mainly use it for news-articles around films, directors and actors, it's also very helpfull for magazines like the german film-dienst. I'm most active at the german Wikipedia, I've there about 16.000 edits, and I'm about 4 years active.--CennoxX (talk @ dewiki) 15:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:HighBeam/Prior_applications&oldid=631621974"