Jump to content

User talk:Rschen7754

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Resignation

[edit]

I resign as administrator and editor of the English Wikipedia. After 18 years, it has become clear to me that there are significant disagreements between where this site is going and where I believe it needs to go. Considering that I need to be spending less time on Wikipedia due to a career and personal life, it seems better to part ways and move on. I thank those that I have worked with and wish them the best. Rschen7754 00:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very sorry to see this, and wish you all the best - jc37 00:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Curious what "there are significant disagreements between where this site is going and where I believe it needs to go" really boils down to. Are you comfortable elaborating (here or in email)?  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  09:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would point to the links on my page, and also immediately above this discussion. --Rschen7754 15:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, and I've read it all. Interesting stuff, and I can see the reasons for the fork. Good luck with that project! I've long thought that more specialized information would lead to a profusion of other wikis. While this has mostly happened with pop-culture topics over at Fandom (ex-Wikia), it's nice to see it start happening for the nitty-gritty details of less trivial topics. Hopefully some of your work over there can still translate into "encyclopedically compressed" improvements over here, too.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  05:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your good work over the years Andre🚐 16:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Saw this on BN. Thank you for all of your work and enjoy real life. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 18:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm late to the party but best of luck with whatever you pursue in the future, I hope we'll cross paths again eventually! Legoktm (talk) 06:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh man! Likewise, but I'm truly excited about the new roads being travelled & would love to chat about that sometime. All warmth, – SJ + 17:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Rschen7754,
I'm also late to hearing this news. Thank you for all that you have contributed over 18 years, it's been invaluable. Good luck with whatever you decide to spend your time on, those folks will be lucky! Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rschen, did not know you that well, but I did like what I saw of you and I hate to see good people not stay with us and keep up the good fight. Best Wishes. Huggums537voted! (sign🖋️|📞talk) 06:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Nicolae (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, no reception. ISFDb lists no review for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:30, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Soul Harvest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception. ISFDb lists no review for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:30, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Assassins (LaHaye novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. ISFDb lists no review for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The Indwelling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. ISFDb lists no reviews for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The Mark (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. ISFDb lists no reviews for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:32, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Desecration (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. Second ref failed verification (for bestseller status). ISFDb lists no reviews for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:33, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The Remnant (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. ISFDb lists no reviews for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Armageddon (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. ISFDb lists no reviews for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:34, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article The Rapture (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Run-of-the-mill bestseller-of-the-week claim; other than that, unreferenced (except the book itself), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. ISFDb lists no review for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:39, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kingdom Come (LaHaye novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced (except a catalogue), no reception = WP:GNG and WP:V fail. ISFDb lists no review for this and subsequent parts. Suggest redirecting this to Left_Behind#Main_series per WP:ATD-R.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:40, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicolae (novel) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicolae (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolae (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Soul Harvest

[edit]

Hello Rschen7754, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Soul Harvest, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Harvest.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Veko}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

veko. (user | talk | contribs) he/him 20:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Rschen7754. Thank you for your work on The Remnant (novel). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunDawn Contact me! 00:08, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Desecration (novel) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Desecration (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desecration (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]