User talk:Rcsprinter123

Rcsprinter123

User page Talk Content
creations DYK Commons Awards Subpages

Last editor to this page: Rcsprinter123 (talk · contribs)

Archives

1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 •
11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 •
21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30•
31 • 32 • 33 • 34 • 35 • 36 • 37 • 38 • 39 • 40•
41 • 42 • 43 • 44 • 45 • 46 • 47 • 48 • 49 • 50• 51 • 52 • 53• 54• 55•

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived by .

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

No RfXs since 17:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC).—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}

Good article reassessment for Mount Washington

Mount Washington has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:05, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year
	Happy New Year! May 2026 be your best year yet! BD2412 T 01:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

VAT image

Hi @Rcsprinter123: Regarding this image: , which is in use in the Value-added tax article. The third arrow pointing downwards should say 0.03 (0.15 - 0.12), not 0.15. In the image I originally created (), it correctly shows as 0.03, and this image then correctly appears in that earlier version of the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Value-added_tax&oldid=743170531#With_a_value-added_tax). The only change that I can see has been made to the image is when it was 'vectorised' by yourself, but I have no idea what that means, or why that would have changed it. Is this something you can help with? Many thanks. Mmitchell10 (talk) 21:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC) (PS. Also pinging @Fernan860: for interest.)[reply]

Mmitchell10: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Vectorisation means that I recreated your diagram as an SVG file, so that it can be viewed at different scales without any loss of resolution. The use of the wrong number was a simple mistake from not following the original quite closely enough. I have reuploaded a corrected version into the file currently used in the article. I apologise that it has been showing incorrectly for a little while but am glad to have been able to easily resolve it. Kind regards, Rcsprinter123 (express) 00:53, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]