Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 122 discussions have been relisted.

July 22, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – Kino Barrandov → Barrandov Kino – The broadcaster officially renamed this television channel from "Kino Barrandov" to "Barrandov Kino" in February 2025. This change is documented in the official broadcasting license issued by the Czech broadcasting authority (RRTV). * Official Source (License): The updated license reflecting the new name "Barrandov Kino" can be found in this official PDF document from the regulatory body: rrtv.gov.cz, license l875306. The new name is stated on the fourth page. This move aligns the article with the current, official name of the subject, per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:Official names. Thank you. Cookieman25 (talk) 13:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – 2016 Jiangsu tornado → 2016 Funing tornado – Like the previous one said, "Jiangsu tornado" doesn't make sense because that's name of the province. More sources also call in the "Funing tornado," including this research paper that focuses on the event. The reason for including the year is because another significant EF3 tornado struck Funing in 2023, killing 5 people. As for the "Fucheng" suggestion, I think they're referring to a town in Funing, although no sources mention it or use the name Fucheng, so this suggestion should be discarded.
    Overall, the name Jiangsu tornado is too broad and not the WP:COMMONNAME; Funing tornado is much more appropriate and what most sources call it, and the year is probably necessary because of another significant tornado in the same area in 2023. Therefore, 2016 Funing tornado is the best option Yobatna (talk) 18:08, 16 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:14, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – History of Chinese immigration to the United Kingdom → History of Chinese Britons – Request made on 3 accounts: Firstly, the brevity of the proposed title. Secondly, the proposed title better matches other existing Wiki articles on similar topics, such as the History of Chinese Americans and History of Chinese Australians pages, both of which are currently linked in the article's text. Chinese Britons is also a term used to refer to such individuals and groups on the article for British Chinese Mysdias (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC) and would not be a new invention. Lastly, in my view "History of chinese immigration to the united kingdom" restricts the potential scope or view of the article. Of course, there are many Chinese Britons who are not 1st or even 2nd generation immigrants, and have spent their whole lives living in the United Kingdom. Owing to this, I think that the proposed title better represents the article's role and purpose - to detail teh history of chinese communities in the United Kingdom - better than the current title without drastically altering the aim of the article. Mysdias (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 10:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Burping → Belching – Page was moved previously to Burping with no discussion. nGrams has shown belching to be more in use since before page name was moved. Almost all reviews and papers use the term 'belching'. Burping is the colloquial term, and as 'heart attack' is the common term for myocardial infarction it is not the page name. Iztwoz (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Cuauhtémoc–Brooklyn Bridge collision → Cuauhtémoc–Brooklyn Bridge crash – Follow-up to resolve lingering question from the last RM as to whether crash, collision, or some other noun is the best descriptor for this incident. Crash is my top choice and I will present the others in rough order of preference from the prior RM; note that I was involved in this lengthy discussion and may miss details and nuanced arguments. I think collision is reasonable but I appreciate the objections raised. I would not use the other terms. # crash‍: This appeared to be the most common noun used at the time of the last RM and in the initial wave of coverage. This term is widely used in reliable sources and is accessible to a general audience. It satisfies the naming WP:CRITERIA well: it is certainly recognizable, natural, precise, and concise. # collision‍: A few editors pointed out that in maritime terminology collision specifically refers to an incident involving two moving vessels (hence the prefix co-). Thus a "crash" between a moving ship and a stationary object such as a bridge is not properly described as a collision. This may explain why high quality sources used crash more often. Common usage does not make this distinction and many reliable sources do use collision and collide to describe this incident. On the other hand, where a suitable alternative exists (crash‍) it may be good editorial practice to avoid collision even if most readers won't notice. # strike‍: This had limited support but is reasonably descriptive and is found in sources, especially as a verb (The ship struck the bridge). # accident‍: Some sources including the NTSB do use this terminology. Though often used imprecisely in every day language, accident can imply that an event was unavoidable or that a finding of no fault has been made. Style guides for motor vehicle collisions often recommend against this word (e.g., Washington State Department of Transportation and this from Rutgers). # allision‍: This was raised several times and met with vigorous opposition. In maritime terminology, allision is the term for a moving vessel striking a stationary object. This word is found in dictionaries but will be inaccessible to most readers. Allision is not used in any article titles on WP. WP:DISASTER is silent on this usage question for maritime incidents but does have guidance for trains. (EDIT 18:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC): WP:DISASTER guidance on "accident" is discussed in the thread.) I could not find many articles to review for consistency. 1938 Muncy Raft crash does involve a moving vessel striking a bridge. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 16:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. CoconutOctopus talk 18:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 06:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Penticton Vees (junior A) → Penticton Vees (BCHL) – The "Junior A" classification is no longer applicable to BCHL teams. In 2023, the BCHL became independent from Hockey Canada and subsequently dropped the "Junior A" designation, now classifying its teams simply as "Junior."[1] This change in the BCHL's self-classification makes the "Junior A" disambiguator outdated and inaccurate. Furthermore, BC Hockey (the provincial governing body) now uses the term "Junior A" to refer to a level of hockey that would be considered "Junior B" in most other jurisdictions, adding to the ambiguity and potential for misunderstanding if the old title were retained. Therefore, "Penticton Vees (BCHL)" is the most accurate and clear title, directly linking the team to its current league affiliation. Buffalkill (talk) 03:38, 15 July 2025 (UTC) Buffalkill (talk) 03:38, 15 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 05:02, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Naegleriasis → Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis – Primary amoebic meningoencephalitis is the primary name for this condition, not naegleriasis. Google Ngram Viewer[2] shows that the former is used 7.9 times more than the latter, and that doesn't even include "PAM", which a short form for it. Also, on Google Scholar, the former term[3] is used in 3,810 articles while the latter[4] is used in just 123, showing that the former is the primary name of this condition in the scientific literature. Most reliable web sources also use the term primary amoebic meningoencephalitis, including [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] and [12]. Even if you search "naegleriasis" on a search engine, almost all reliable sources sources will use the term primary amoebic meningoencephalitis. Cyrobyte (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:26, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 21, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – Swedish Serbs → Serbs in Sweden – WP:TITLECON. See the pre-RM discussion: Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Fooians in Barland, Fooians of Barland, or Barland Fooians?. These comparison tables help explain why:
* 6x Form 1: Fooians in Switzerland ** Albanians in Switzerland ** Arabs in Switzerland ** Filipinos in Switzerland ** Finns in Switzerland ** Indians in Switzerland ** Turks in Switzerland * 1x Form 1c: Fooian people in Switzerland ** Romani people in Switzerland * 2x Form 4: Fooians Swiss ** Haitian Swiss ** Tibetan Swiss * 1x Form 2: Fooians of Switzerland ** Croats of Switzerland (nominated)
* 27x Form 1: Fooians in Sweden ** Afghans in Sweden ** Albanians in the Nordic countries ** List of Albanians in Scandinavia ** Americans in Sweden ** Arabs in Sweden ** Armenians in Sweden ** Assyrians in Sweden ** Bosniaks in Sweden ** Croats in Sweden ** Eritreans in Sweden ** Ethiopians in Sweden ** Germans in Sweden ** Indians in Sweden ** Kurds in Sweden ** Latvians in Sweden ** Lithuanians in Sweden ** Macedonians in Sweden ** Mandaeans in Sweden ** Norwegians in Sweden ** Poles in Sweden ** Portuguese in Sweden ** Russians in Sweden ** Somalis in Sweden ** Spaniards in Sweden ** Turks in Sweden ** Ukrainians in Sweden ** Uruguayans in Sweden * 2x Form 1b: Fooian [something] in/to Sweden ** African immigrants to Sweden ** Asian immigrants to Sweden * 1x Form 1c: Fooian people in Sweden ** Chinese people in Sweden * 1x Form 3: Sweden Fooians ** Sweden Finns * 2x Form 4: Fooians Swedes ** Chilean Swedes ** Italian Swedes * 4x Form 4b: Swedish Fooians ** Swedish Baloch ** Swedish Greeks ** Swedish Iraqis ** Swedish Serbs (nominated)
* We're making this RM as easy and clear-cut as possible, to serve as a useful precedent for later RMs of this type. NLeeuw (talk) 23:20, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Devin Moore (murderer) → ? – Fairly clear case of WP:BIO1E. The shooting was more impactful, with no notability for Moore after his conviction. I'd be in favor of rendering the page either a more detailed event article on the three murders (something like "Murders of Arnold Strickland, James Crump and Leslie Mealer" or "2003 murders of Fayette police employees" or just "2003 Fayette shooting", in line with other police killing articles) or simply merging it into the existing Strickland v. Sony, which currently lacks details on the killings themselves, not even containing the victims' names. Rubintyrann (talk) 17:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Steven Pladl triple murder and suicide → Pladl case – The current title feels awkward and doesn't capture the entirety of the case. Steven Pladl and Rose Fusco had already gained significant national and some international attention in February 2018, prior to the murders, after their arrest on adultery charges. The new title would be more in line with other criminal incest cases such as Fritzl case or Mongelli case. Although the more descriptive "Pladl incest and murder case" would be more accurate, it might be too lengthy while "Pladl incest case" would exclude the murders that led to the most and ultimately sustained coverage. Rubintyrann (talk) 13:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 02:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 20, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – Marcus Wesson → ? – Wesson is inevitably the primary focus of media reporting, but the page would be better as an event page than a criminal biography, as the mass murder incorporated into the text, being the single deadliest of its kind in the city's history, deserves a page of its own. Seeing as the sexual abuse and cult-like structure within Wesson's family was also subject to signifcant coverage, a new title should be in vein of other criminal articles with incest such as Colt clan incest case or Fritzl case. While I'd have no problem naming two separate articles "2004 Fresno murders/Wesson family murders" and "Wesson incest case", I can't really think of a name for the single article they'll remain in should a move request be deemed appropriate. Rubintyrann (talk) 13:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 19:10, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Etisalat and → E& – -- I propose that the article Etisalat and be moved to E&. The current title is not the official name of the company and does not reflect the branding used by the entity following the rebranding of Etisalat to e&. The company's official name is “e&”, as reflected on their website [18], and is used by reliable secondary sources including Reuters, Bloomberg, and the company itself. The target page E& currently exists only as a redirect and can be overwritten by an admin. This move would improve clarity and accuracy in naming, aligning with current branding. Fullquarter (talk) 11:26, 13 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 12:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – PC World → PCWorld – I propose renaming PC World to PCWorld to reflect the magazine's current official stylization and branding. The website and publication now consistently use "PCWorld" as a single word. === Rationale === * The official site is branded as PCWorld (see https://www.pcworld.com). * Most modern references use the one-word version. * It aligns with Wikipedia's policy on using the most commonly recognizable name (WP:COMMONNAME). Icaldonta (talk) 19:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 07:43, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:35, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Achilles' heel → Achilles heel – While both of these variants are quite close in frequency per Google Ngrams, the current title should be avoided because it contradicts MOS:'s:

    For the possessive of singular nouns, including proper names and words ending in s, add 's (my daughter's achievement, my niece's wedding, Cortez's men, the boss's office, Illinois's largest employer, the US's partners, Descartes's philosophy, Verreaux's eagle). Exception: abstract nouns ending with an /s/ sound when followed by sake (for goodness' sake, for his conscience' sake). If a name ending in s or z would be difficult to pronounce with 's added (Jesus's teachings), consider rewording (the teachings of Jesus).

    ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 07:20, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Giovanni Matteo Mario → ? – The article lead starts with Giovanni Matteo De Candia,[1] also known as Mario, fairly consistently uses just Mario in the text, and notes: the budding singer adopted the mononym Mario as his stage name when he made his debut on 30 November 1838.[6] Sometimes, however, he is referred to in print by the fuller appellation of "Giovanni Mario", and he is also called "Mario de Candia". (That text seems to have been in the article for over fifteen years.) So this title "Giovanni Matteo Mario" isn't actually common, then? Here's a relevant Google Books Ngrams, a graph of book references to these names. The name we have in the lead isn't even detected. At the same time, the 19th century spike in the number of references to "Mario" can probably be attributed to this person. That element of the graph alone is large enough that we have to remove it in order to see the rest. If we look at more variants, like this or like this, it looks like at the time there's a lot of references to Signor Mario, too, as well as further mononymous references to Mario and other contemporary artists. The second name Matteo doesn't seem to be commonly used in comparison. So, maybe Mario (opera singer)? Mario (tenor) already redirects here, but was moved in 2011. I came across this incongruity while researching at Talk:Mario. Mario (singer) is already taken - maybe that needs to be disambiguated, too. Joy (talk) 10:30, 5 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 07:43, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:24, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Cancún → Cancun – In 2021 there was an attempt to do this. At the time, people argued that since Zürich wasn't changed to Zurich, Cancún shouldn't be changed either. Now, Zürich is listed under its common English name, Zurich. At the time people were cherrypicking the subsection of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English-language sources), "WP:DIACRITICS", selectively using the phrases "The use of modified letters in article titles is neither encouraged nor discouraged" and "The policy on using common names and on foreign names does not prohibit the use of modified letters" as a reason not to move the page, yet ommiting the accompanying phrases, "when deciding between versions of a word that differ in the use or non-use of modified letters, follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language" and "if they are used in the common name as verified by reliable sources", respectively. Google Ngrams shows that "Cancun" has always been the common name in English. As stated above, the city's tourism agency ommits the accent in the English version of the website (in the same way Celine Dion's website does it in English vs. French). Spanish is not an official language in Mexico, and insisting that the accent is required merely for "respect for other languages" would support the argument for changing "Mexico" to "México", since that is the country's de facto colloquial name in Spanish. (CC) Tbhotch™ 17:41, 26 June 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 08:58, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:21, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis → IUPUI – IUPUI had three long-form names over the course of its existence: Indiana University–Purdue University at Indianapolis (with the word "at," 1969-1992), Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis (official form, 1992-2024), and Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (most common form used on official publications, without the dash, 1992-2024). Regarding naming conventions, College and university article advice makes two relevant statements: (1) "This section is a complement to Wikipedia's naming conventions, not a replacement. Always consider the Wikipedia conventions first when naming a page." (It follows deeper below.) (2) "Never use abbreviations or acronyms in titles unless the institution you are naming is almost exclusively known only by including such terms and is widely used in that form. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (abbreviations) for more information." According to Acronyms in page titles, "Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject." Acronyms are usually avoided for disambiguation purposes, but I've never seen anything else called "IUPUI." I worked for IUPUI University Libraries in the late 1990s, and I created IUPUI's Library of Congress name heading within the Library of Congress's Program for Cooperative Cataloging, which is "IUPUI (Campus)." I did that after systematically surveying the presentation of IUPUI's name on its publications throughout its existence to that date, namely 1999. Given that IUPUI had one long-form name for about 13 years and two other long-form names for 32 years, the abbreviation "IUPUI" is by far and away the most common name used both by the organization itself and outsiders, and the long form virtually always appeared with the abbreviation. Therefore, both the general rule and the specific rule apply. IUPUI's article title should follow the example of NASA and be "IUPUI." Waering (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:10, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – A Guy Walks Into a Bar (song) → A Guy Walks Into a Bar – The last RM was all over the place, with two supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I'm surprised it wasn't closed as no consensus or at least relisted, and IMO it should be reassessed. This is the only work with the exact name "A Guy Walks Into a Bar" and should be the primary topic of that form of the exact phrase "A Guy Walks Into a Bar": * The NCIS episode is titled "A Man Walks Into a Bar..." with "man" instead of "guy", and an ellipsis at the end. * The Justified episode does not have the leading "A". * The Mini Mansions work does not have the leading "A", and also has an ellipsis at the end. Therefore, the Tyler Farr song is the only work with the exact title "A Guy Walks Into a Bar", and a hatnote to bar joke is sufficient. Anything else for the song is WP:OVERPRECISION, and I am not convinced of the arguments to the contrary. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:10, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:08, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Shriram Lagoo → Shreeram Lagoo – This was first moved [19] by @NAKHISM with the rationale "Misspelled: disambiguation needed". That was reverted [20] by @Rotideypoc41352, apparently after an IP request at RM/TR, with the intention of opening an RM. It seems this didn't happen, and this move has again been requested by an IP at RM/TR with the rationale "The name of his spelling is officially Shreeram and not Shriram. You can check the spelling when his name is shown in the film credits". I have no opinion in this matter, but am opening an RM on procedural grounds so that editors, including IPs, on both sides of this debate can discuss their reasoning and resolve the issue. Toadspike [Talk] 13:15, 5 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 16:04, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 11:03, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – GeForce GTX 10 series → GeForce 10 series – I am requesting that the GTX 10 series and GTX 900 series articles be moved back to their previous titles without 'GTX', as these older series of GPUs includes models branded as GT or even just plain numbers (e.g. GeForce 930M), which makes the titles inaccurate on a technical level. Note, however, that the GTX 16 series move is unopposed by me as that series of GPUs only includes GTX-branded models (i.e. no GT or plain numbered models). Bit unfortunate that I missed the opportunity to point this out in the previous RM that resulted in the move to the current titles, but oh well. — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 10:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 19, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – Jarvis Johnson → Jarvis Johnson (politician) – I do not believe there is a primary topic for the name Jarvis Johnson on Wikipedia. While the YouTuber is currently getting more daily pageviews and daily average pageviews, there have been spikes in views in both pages based on current events. The politician's page rapidly spiked in views after U.S. representative Sylvester Turner's death in March. There were smaller spikes at the YouTuber's page on May 1 and July 1 of this year - not sure what the causes of those were. Per WikiNav, about 20% of outbound clicks from the politician's page are going to the YouTuber. I wouldn't mind if a consensus forms that the YouTuber is the primary topic, but I see any possible concerns about recentism and believe that the best course of action would be a disambiguation page. wizzito | say hello! 18:27, 4 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 08:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Agent 007 (talk) 13:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – United Nations Ocean Conference → 2017 United Nations Ocean Conference – Since 2017, there have been three UN Ocean Conferences, and a fourth is planned for 2028. The title of this article being simply "UN Ocean Conference" implies that the article covers all of the events collectively, which it doesn't—this article is about the 2017 event in particular, and the sequels are only briefly mentioned. I think it would make sense to have this article focus on the 2017 conference, and create another one that covers them all as a series, maybe with some of the content transferred from this article. Also would create an article for each individual conference. Thoughts? Omnigrade (talk) 04:04, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Python brongersmai → Blood python – Wikipedia prefers common names, and this species has a clearly dominant, unambiguous common name. "Blood python" is more common than "Python brongersmai" in Google Scholar, Google Ngrams, and general search results. All of the common names given by the Reptile Database and ITIS, which are major well-recognized authorities on the subject, are either the proposed name or minor variations of it formed by prefixing it with some adjective, and the Reptile Database lists the proposed name first. The other names listed by those authorities are "Red blood python", "Malaysian blood python", and "Sumatran blood python", but using one of those would go against WP:CONCISE, since "Blood python" seems sufficiently unambiguous. The proposed name has redirected to this article for a decade. The scholarly article cited for this snake's taxonomy uses "blood python" as the primary name in its abstract. Publications – especially those intended for general public readership – very clearly, primarily and dominantly refer to this snake as the blood python. I submitted an RM with the same suggestion three years ago, which failed to achieve consensus, and it is not clear to me why. Two people opposed it, but the reasons they gave do not seem very closely related to Wikipedia article title policies & guidelines. The proposal had majority support, but that wasn't deemed sufficient by the person who closed the RM. When asked about why they closed it the way they did, they said they just did not think "there was enough level of consensus", and suggested "to start a new discussion in a few weeks". It has now been three years. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:31, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Menelik II's conquests → Agar Maqnat – "Agar Maqnat" is a used local term to describe this period in reliable academic sources[22][23] including Encyclopaedia Aethiopica while "Menelik II's conquests" or "invasions" or "expansions" comes up with no mentions in any scholarly literature. I was the creator of this article, and I gave it the name "Menelik's Expansions" some 3 years ago because I did not know that there was a specific term for this period in Ethiopian history. There is no official English equivalent for these name of these conquests, the name should be changed to its indigenous name similar to other African articles such the Mfecane, Gukurahundi, Ikiza, etc. Socialwave597 (talk) 02:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 18, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – Dujiaogui → Dokkakgwi – Per article content, the topic may be relatively more important in Korean culture than Chinese. Although the concept originates in China, what matters is where a concept is more important. For example, "Kraft Dinner" is the non-American name for an American product called "Kraft Macaroni and Cheese", but the article uses that title because the dish is proportionately more significant in Canada and other places that use "Kraft Dinner". grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 22:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – The World (WWE) → WWF New York – This establishment was known as "The World" for less than a year, whereas it was established as "WWF New York", and lasted for over three years. I believe the introduction should be "WWF New York (later known as The World)". I also believe based on this that WWF New York meets WP:COMMONNAME. Icaldonta (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Ballobar, Huesca → Ballobar – The disambiguation page "Ballobar" is currently a pointless single-entry disambiguation. The town in Huesca is the only town that appears to be called "Ballobar", and is the primary topic on the Spanish and Aragonese Wikipedias. As I'm not sure why this needs disambiguating, I'm proposing it be moved. Grnrchst (talk) 14:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Hyunjin → Hyunjin (rapper) – Both individuals are consistently referred to in reliable secondary sources by the mononym "Hyunjin" (Korean: 현진), not their full names.[24][25][26][27][28][29]. While both could be described as singers in general and perform vocals (as is typical for K-pop idols), the former (Stray Kids member) is primarily notable as a rapper, as reflected by the order of roles in the article lead and consistent with coverage in reliable sources, while the latter (Loona/Loossemble member) is primarily notable as a singer, providing clear grounds for disambiguation per WP:SINGERDAB and MOS:ROLEBIO. While ROLEBIO does not strictly dictate article titles, it helps identify the role for which each subject is best known. Other disambiguation options are unsuitable: "(singer, born 2000)" isn't applicable since both were born in 2000, and "(entertainer)" is discouraged per SINGERDAB, which recommends that disambiguator only "if the person is also well-known in other non-musical entertainment fields", both individuals are primarily known for musical performance and idol activities, not broader entertainment roles. Likewise, a hyphenated or full-name version for the latter (Loona/Loossemble member) is also not appropriate. A WP:BEFORE search for "Kim Hyun-jin" in Google, Bing, Naver, and Daum returns Kim Hyun-jin (the actor), rather than the Loona/Loossemble member. A search for "Kim Hyunjin" returns results referring to the Loona/Loossemble member as simply "Hyunjin", rather than under her full name. If the former (Stray Kids member) is determined to be the primary topic, that's acceptable and reasonable. However, the latter (Loona/Loossemble member) should not remain at Kim Hyunjin, which is an unnatural, obscure, and unused form, contrary to WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NATURALDAB. Her article should be moved to Hyunjin (singer), the most accurate and policy-compliant title. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 17, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – People's Party (United States) → Populist Party (United States) – As article states, WP:Common name is "Populist Party", not "People's Party". Precedent exists for using nicknames of briefly-prominent (now non-extant) U.S. third-parties in instances where such a nickname has become the common name: such as with the articles Bull Moose Party (using a nickname rather than the formal "Progressive Party" name) and Know Nothing (using a colloquial name rather than the formal names of "American Party" or "Native American Party"). The fact that this is the common name is stated in the first sentence of the article. It is also evidenced by the fact that when when "People's Party (United States)" is entered into link-generating election box templates or election infoboxes, the Wikipedia is currently-coded so that those templates currently generate "Populist" as the displayed party name rather than "People's". I have proposed naming it simply "Populist Party (United States)" rather than further disambiguation, as any other United States parties using the "Populist" name have failed to obtain anywhere near the same political note as this one, making this one the common subject of that name. That is the reason why "Populist Party (United States)" currently redirects to this page, instead of serving as a disambiguation page. SecretName101 (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Brazilian Institute of Public Opinion and Statistics → IBOPE – This move is proposed per Wikipedia's "Common Name" policy (WP:COMMONNAME). The subject is overwhelmingly known and referred to in reliable English-language sources (media, business press, academic articles) simply as "IBOPE." While the current title is the formal name, it is rarely used in common parlance or reporting, making it less recognizable to readers. A search of news archives and academic journals confirms that "IBOPE" is the primary identifier. The proposed title is concise, widely recognized, and unambiguous. The full name is properly stated in the article's lead sentence. Thank you. Antoniowand (talk) 16:08, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Checkers (video game) → ? – Not wanting to risk butchering a newly-promoted GA, I am launching an RM here amid discussion above. "Checkers (video game)" is too ambiguous, being unable to distinguish Christopher Strachey's Checkers from the general topic of computer checkers. My first choice would be Checkers (1952 video game), as this was the article's original title before it was moved. However, the video game referred to here as "Checkers" did not have a proper title. Strachey only referred to it as a "computer program" that just so happened to simulate checkers (the term "video game" was not in common use in 1952). But since "Checkers" was developed in the United Kingdom, would it be "Draughts" instead of "Checkers"? Not really sure what to think of this one. What do you think? Æ's old account wasn't working (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Cait Sith (Final Fantasy) → Cait Sith (Final Fantasy VII) – I propose moving this article to a more specific title (Final Fantasy VII) due to the fact that there are multiple different characters in the Final Fantasy series named Cait Sith. The current title, which just refers to the Final Fantasy series as a whole, has the potential to create confusion. For example, I just removed a wiki link to this article from Final Fantasy XI because this article covers the FFVII Cait Sith, who is an entirely different character than the FFXI Cait Sith. Whoever inserted the wiki link on Final Fantasy XI was likely confused by this article's current title. Therefore, I think that renaming the article to "Cait Sith (Final Fantasy VII)" will more accurately reflect the subject of the article, and therefore reduce confusion amongst the different characters named Cait Sith across the series. Alith Anar 14:19, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Kirisuto no Haka → Tomb of Christ (Japan) – This article's current title uses the monument's Japanese name (romanised) instead of an English translation. I can't easily find an English source which refers to it as Kirisuto no Haka, rather, most tend to use translations such as "Christ's Grave," "the Grave of Jesus Christ," or "the Tomb of Christ." Similar translations are also reflected on the area's local signage. To best honour the spirit of WP:UE, I believe that the article should be renamed and moved to a space such as "Tomb of Christ (Japan)" — with the inclusion of "(Japan)" to remove ambiguity from other, similar monuments. ItsSwimm (talk) 10:45, 1 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 14:59, 9 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 12:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Gene Shift Auto → Skillshot City – The game has been officially renamed to "Skillshot City", which is now the Steam title and public brand. The old name is obsolete and no longer used by the developer or players. The new name is now on the official website, steam page, twitter, IGDB page, youtube. It's also received press coverage on the name changed, referenced below. The page should be updated to reflect the new name. Bencelot (talk) 08:45, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Richard Hauptmann → Bruno Richard Hauptmann – Per WP:COMMONNAME. I do not dispute that use of the term "Bruno" was foisted on the public's consciousness by prosecutors even though "neither Hauptmann nor his family or friends used the name Bruno." But while that might have been an injustice, one of many, it is not the job of Wikipedia to "right great wrongs." Googling "Bruno Richard Hauptmann" results in 62,000 hits, and the name "Bruno" is included even in the titles of books that are sympathetic to him. Coretheapple (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Turtletennisfogwheat (talk) 04:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 16, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – Turkish offensive into northeastern Syria (2024–2025) → ? – So to end the discussion once and for all: #My position: "the Turkish ground forces [we]re not involved" as the offensive was executed by the SNA with some Turkish air support so i agreed to "SNA–Turkish campaign in Northern Syria (2024–2025)" #@Ecrusized and Lyra Stone: "SNA is a de-facto Turkish proxy force, it is dubious whether they can take any military action without direct Turkish supervision." so it should be called "Turkish offensive into northeastern Syria (2024–2025)" #@Gluonz: "feels too similar to ones that were rejected" so "Rojava conflict (2024–2025)" changed the years a bit; @Bobfrombrockley Braganza (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Zachtronics → Zach Barth – With the closure of Zachtronics but the opening of Coincidence, the latter unlikely to show its own notability beyond either Zachtronics or Barth himself, it makes better sense to now have this page at Barth, with both Zachtronics and Coincidence discussed (and proper linkage from redirects or dab pages). Going off what I'm seeing for Kaizen, from Coincidence, its still all tied to Barth himself and his team, and it doesn't make sense to cover Coicidence within a page about Zachtronics since that change was intended to move away from the stigma of making "zach-like" games. I recognize this is undoing the move request from 2017, but a lot has changed since. Masem (t) 04:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 15, 2025

[edit]
  • (Discuss) – Brian Liu → Draft:Brian Liu – To be blunt, this article is a mess. Upon reviewing the edit history, the page was denied in the draft space but its creator pushed it through themselves. Since then, they have been banned for sockpuppetry and were suspected to be a paid contributor. The resources are a mess, the layout and structure is sloppy. I believe it should be moved to the draft space, be properly reviewed for notability, and get a proper cleanup/rewrite. No consensus was reached on AFD discussion but perhaps this is a compromise that can be agreed upon? TXstockman5 (talk) 22:44, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elapsed listings

[edit]
Shortcut
The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.

Backlog

[edit]
Shortcut
Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.
  • (Discuss) – Kernicterus → Bilirubin Encephalopathy – kernicterus is the Chronic form of Bilirubin Encephalopathy. There is also an Acute Bilirubin Encephalopathy (ABE) which takes place before the chronic phase and it is not Kernicterus. We can not have the acute phase on an article purly based on its chronic phase, but with a title change there wont be any confusions. This way the article can be written for both phases with a lot more information, but if we keep it as Kernicterus then there needs to be another article for its Acute phase which does not make sense. This short article explains my reasoning. Also as per WP:COMMONNAME, results on National Library of Medicine shows Bilirubin Encephalopathy close to 30,000, and Kernicterus shows 5500. That is widely because Kernicterus is the specific type of Bilirubin Encephalopathy. DrTheHistorian✎ 23:00, 27 June 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:59, 5 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPathtalk 06:46, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – 2017 Hamas charter → Hamas Document of General Principles and Policies – The current title does not reflect how this document is most commonly and neutrally described in reliable sources, contrary to WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NPOV. An analysis of sources shows that sources more frequently use "document" or similar terms than "charter", even when generously counting sources that use "charter" only with qualifications like "could be considered." Among sources that consider whether this constitutes a charter, there is no consensus, with some explicitly noting the document "does not replace the charter." The proposed title uses the official name given by Hamas, reflects the predominant terminology in sources, and maintains neutrality on the contested question of whether this document constitutes a new charter. If you're concerned about the length of the proposed title, please indicate whether an alternative 2017 Hamas policy document would be preferable. The current name is the result of a move that was done without a RM despite being clearly controversial and was challenged almost immediately here, so it doesn't constitute a stable consensus version. Alaexis¿question? 21:02, 18 June 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. CoconutOctopus talk 17:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Nuseirat rescue and massacre → Nuseirat raid – The term massacre is absent from neutral and pro-Israel sources and thus violates NCENPOV. Two reasons, the RfC on EuroMed as yellow and always attribute and WP:TITLEWARRIOR, which called out opinion pieces and failing to recognize authorial voice (newspaper quotes X who says massacre, therefore newspaper says massacre which is false). This is similar to Entebbe raid, and the AP (premier neutral source) has also clarified less than a month ago that the Paletinian deaths ocurred during a gun battle during the raid (see [31]) Closetside (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed requests

[edit]
See "Bot considerations"

Possibly incomplete requests

[edit]
See "Request all associated moves explicitly"

References

[edit]
References generally should not appear here. Use {{reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there.
  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference ABC was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference TMR2024 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Current_discussions&oldid=1302002525"