Wikipedia:Files for discussion

Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · Purge this page

WP:FFDWP:FFD

XFD backlog
V	May	Jun	Jul	Total
CfD	0	0	67	67
TfD	1	9	13	23
MfD	0	4	0	4
FfD	0	1	5	6
RfD	0	3	30	33
AfD	0	0	1	1

Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which may be unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or the nominator specifically requests deletion or removal and no objections are raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.

What not to list here

For concerns not listed below, if a deletion is uncontroversial, do not use this process. Instead tag a file with {{subst:prod}}. However, if the template is removed, please do not reinsert it; list the file for deletion then.
For speedy deletion candidates as well, do not use this page; instead use one of the speedy deletion templates. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
Files that have no source, have an unknown copyright, are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
1. {{subst:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated.
2. {{subst:nld}} if a file has a source but no licensing information.
3. {{subst:orfud}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but isn't used in any articles.
4. {{subst:rfu}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but could be replaced by a free file.
5. {{subst:dfu|reason}} if a file has a non-free copyright template but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed.
6. {{subst:nrd}} if a file has no non-free use rationale.
Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
1. {{db-f1|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
2. {{now commons|File:NEW FILENAME}} if the file now exists on Commons, or {{now commons}} for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file {{db-f9}}.
If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license but lacks verification of this (either by a VRT ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
Description pages with no local file, even though they are in the file namespace, should not be listed here.
1. Redirects should be treated as in any other namespace: if no speedy deletion criteria apply, they should be listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.
2. Local description pages with no associated file are speedy-deletable under criterion G8; use {{db-imagepage}}.
3. Local description pages for files hosted on Commons are usually speedy-deletable under criterion F2 if there is no content relevant to Wikipedia; use {{db-fpcfail}}.
4. Any other local description pages for files hosted on Commons should be listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 8 for files.
If you are the uploader of the image, tag it with {{db-author}}.

Instructions for listing files for discussion

Use Twinkle. If you can't, follow these steps to do manually:

1	Edit the file page. Add `{{Ffd\|log=2025 July 13}}` to the file page.
2	Create its FfD subsection. Follow this edit link and list the file using `{{subst:Ffd2\|File_name.ext\|uploader=\|reason=}}` `~~~~` Leave the subject heading blank. If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons. For listing additional files with the same reason, edit the first file section and use `{{subst:Ffd2a\|File_name.ext\|Uploader=}}` for each additional file. You may use this tool to quickly generate Ffd2a listings. Also, add `{{Ffd\|log=2025 July 13}}` to the top of the file page of each file other than the first one nominated.
3	Give due notice. Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using `{{subst:Ffd notice\|File_name.ext}}` Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media For multiple images by the same user, use `{{subst:Ffd notice multi\|First_file.ext\|Second_file.ext\|Third_file.ext}}` `~~~~` (can handle up to 26) If the image is in use, also consider adding `{{FFDC\|File_name.ext\|log=2025 July 13}}` to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:

Delete. Orphaned with no foreseeable encyclopedic usage.
Delete. Replaced by File:FILE2.
Free (public domain) file may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States. This photograph was actually first published in 1932, not 1926.
Remove from ARTICLE1 and ARTICLE2. The file only meets WP:NFCC#8 with its use in ARTICLE3.
Non-free file may actually be free. This logo does not seem to meet the threshold of originality to be eligible for copyright in the United States and should actually be tagged free using {{PD-logo}}.

Examples of what files you may request for discussion, deletion or change here:

Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version.
Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
Low quality – The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
Possibly unfree – The file is claimed as a freely licensed content, but may actually be protected by copyright in either the United States or its country of origin.
NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements.
Disputed copyright status – There is a disagreement between editors over the copyright status of a file. This includes, but is not limited to disputes about whether a file is: too simple for fair use, using the correct license tags, or accurately described by its description page.
Wrongly claimed as own – The file is under a self license, but the information on the file description pages suggests otherwise.

These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.

If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.

If you have general questions about a file and/or its copyright status, then please start a new thread at Media Copyright Questions.

Instructions for discussion participation

In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:

Wikipedia:NFCC#1 – Free equivalent is/is not available
Wikipedia:NFCC#8 – Significance
Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2 – Unacceptable image use

Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.

Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons''', you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.

Instructions for closing discussions

Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.

Old discussions

Shortcut

WP:FFDOWP:FFDO

The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:

July 5

File:The Congregation of Notre Dame convent from rue Saint-Jean-Baptiste, 1684-1768..png

[edit]

File:The Congregation of Notre Dame convent from rue Saint-Jean-Baptiste, 1684-1768..png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

This file was marked as fair use with URAA restored copyright. But because this image was published in 1929 and URAA copyright expired, that means that it’s now in US PD and can be moved to Commons. Michalg95 (talk) 07:38, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons per nom ApexParagon (talk) 15:59, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't seem right. The author died in 1946. This drawing was still copyrighted in Canada in 1996; it didn't lose its copyright protection until ~~1947~~ 1997 (the rule is the year of the creator's death + 50, not just 50 years). {{PD-URAA}} requires it to be PD by 1996. The current licensing appears to be correct. ✗plicit 00:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"1947" or 1997? George Ho (talk) 00:45, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, that's what I get for rewriting my comment several times. Fixed, thanks! ✗plicit 00:49, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In file there is date of publication 1929, which means copyright expired. 2A00:F41:2C25:2FD9:F4D7:D975:F618:470F (talk) 15:11, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 19:57, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google books screenshot.png

[edit]

The text is PD, descriptions are ineligible, and the icons are simple. Not sure this is above TOO Jay Cubby 23:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the quote by Patrick Stewart come from? ✗plicit 00:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is it still a derivative work if the text is so small you can't actually read the quote? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:08, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I could blur the offending quote. Then it would definitely be PS Jay Cubby 15:46, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 19:57, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:David M. Heyman.jpg

[edit]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:David M. Heyman.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:08, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Pending Commons discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Assuming c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:David M. Heyman.jpg is kept. Buffs (talk) 16:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: pending DR at Commons.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 19:58, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 3

File:JohnHymers.jpg

[edit]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:JohnHymers.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:28, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2

File:Tweed Run London 2013.jpg

[edit]

"Feel free to use the image at will" is probably not legally sound enough to warrant us marking this in the public domain. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 20:30, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The objection seems unreasonable - the probability that the author intended the material to be private seems neglible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stripe999 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 19

File:N.F.-Board logo.svg

[edit]

I just found that File:Logo N.F.-Board.png exists on Wikicommons, uploaded by Jean Luc-Kit himself in 2020. So that means if we use that instead of this SVG version, we know there's not a copyright violation here. However, whether or not this complies with WP:NFCC§1:

Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose.

may be uncertain, and may need to be discussed. The reason that is so, is because of WP:NFC§Multiple restrictions:

For a vector image (i.e. SVG) of a non-free logo or other design, US law is not clear as to whether the vectorisation of the logo has its own copyright which exists in addition to any copyright on the actual logo. To avoid this uncertainty, editors who upload vector images of non-free logos should use a vector image that was produced by the copyright holder of the logo and should not use a vector image from a site such as seeklogo.com or Brands of the World where the vectorisation of a logo may have been done without authorization from the logo's copyright holder. If an editor bases a vectorisation they did by themself from a free image, they should indicate the source image so that freeness can be confirmed, and release their contribution (the labour of converting to vectors) under a free license to help with the aforementioned ambiguity.

So should it be deleted in accordance with this, to avoid any uncertainty; or should it acquire the copyright of the version uploaded by Kit, and continue to be used here? wikipedia-kxeon mailbox 18:59, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see no reason the .png file shouldn't be used in lieu of a lower res .svg Buffs (talk) 20:58, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a vectorisation of a image that is, in most circumstances only available in PNG/JPG form, and of really low resolution. I ended up getting caught up in other things so I couldn't respond until 23:00; but if need be, this SVG could be edited to basically copy the PNG that Kit uploaded, and could, possibly, inherently be called a superior version to the PNG version of which Kit had uploaded. wikipedia-kxeon mailbox 03:57, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The point is that this is a derivative work. It cannot obtain new copyright without substantial changes. It is not labeled correctly. Buffs (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article is using 2 non-free images, and thus violating WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non-free items. Either File:N.F.-Board logo.svg or File:NF-Board.png (the non-free version on en.Wikipedia) must therefore be removed and deleted to comply with NFCC. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Based on this upload, it appears the images are mislabeled and are not non-free. Buffs (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emailed the N.F.-Board to ask about the copyright status on Wikicommons. wikipedia-kxeon mailbox 22:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kxeon: Did you get a response? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:26, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't seem like they responded to my mail about the copyright status of the logo:

Vouliez-vous dire de télécharger votre logo sur Wikicommons sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0 ? Les termes de la licence sont au bas de cet e-mail.

Discussion sur Wikicommons à propos des fichiers : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2025_June_19#File:N.F.-Board_logo.svg

I then went on to paste the entire CC BY-SA 4.0 license into the email...

Drats. Worth a shot though, no? kxeon talk 19:41, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For older nominations, see the archives.

Discussions approaching conclusion

Discussions with at least 6 full days since nomination. After 7 days, they may be closed.

July 6

File:End of subathon.png

There is lots of images of Ludwig on Wikicommons, so this one is unnecessary. Sahaib (talk) 11:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, fan content that isn't necessary to understand the article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not replaceable by free content since the image specifically shows the stream, not Ludwig himself. (NFC criterion #1). Same idea behind keeping the cover images for movies, TV shows, etc., this is a singular image that concisely and uniquely represents the subathon. As well, images of that section of the stream are commonly used to represent the stream (it was the end, see google images). — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 19:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beyoncé - NRG Stadium - June 29, 2025.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Whpq (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation with a misleading permission claim. There is no indication in the file source provided this is a free image. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: this already got speedy-deleted, so feel free to close the nomination early. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Recent nominations

July 7

File:Magic Jolin alt cover.jpg

The article's infobox already has the official album cover, so it may violate WP:NFCC#3a. Leehsiao (talk) 06:24, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poppinsfirst4.jpg

Is the image showing side portion of Mary Poppin books still eligible for copyright? One editor ~~thought~~ didn't think so a few years back. Nonetheless, I'm still uncertain due to drawings of the titular character in two of the books, so I recently changed back the copyright status and am bringing this here. Should be kept as unfree if no objections, IMO. George Ho (talk) 23:08, 7 July 2025 (UTC); corrected, 17:53, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 8

File:Logo of the North Carolina Department of Labor.png

Fails WP:NFCC#8: NCDOL and North Carolina Commissioner of Labor are not the same entity. The article using this non-free logo is about the latter, thus the omission of this logo would not be detrimental to understanding of the article. Wcam (talk) 14:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Racing Charleroi Couillet Fleurus logo.png

Former logo which does not significantly enhance the article, so fails WP:NFCC#8. Also fails WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non-free images in article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, as nice as the logo is, there doesn't seem to be any discussion of it as the old logo. — trlkly 19:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 9

File:Iggy Azalea - Fancy featuring Charli XCX (Sample).ogg

There is no justification per requirements of WP:NFCC. The sample isn't used to aid in the discussion of portions or components of the song which are subject to critical commentary. Its omission does nothing to harm the understanding of the topic in the article. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:42, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article discusses the song's beat and its components. hinnk (talk) 22:57, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since there is enough sourced critical commentary to justify its inclusion thereby passing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 04:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ariana Grande - Problem (10th Anniversary Cover).png

Limited edition vinyl cover to celebrate 10th anniversary of the single. The re-release did not receive extensive coverage and was not subject to critical coverage. The inclusion of this cover is not paramount to the topic and thus fails WP:NFCC/. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:47, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: You're trying to remove all the files that related with Azalea, but anyway this single is replaced to that cover, so not fails.

Camilasdandelions (talk!) 00:42, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Sricsi (talk) 15:29, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:IggyAzaleaBlackWidowSample.ogg

The rational and usage of the sample appears to be solely to portray the lyrics of the song. The section where the sample is used is not subject to critical coverage. Its exclusion does not harm the topic of the article and therefore WP:NFCC is not met. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:50, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Would've been better to use an excerpt that captured the drop at the end of this, but there's discussion in the article of the build in this section, the instrumentation, the way Rita Ora sings, and the similarities to "Dark Horse". hinnk (talk) 23:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since there is enough sourced critical commentary to justify its inclusion thereby passing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 04:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jennifer Lopez - Booty (Remix featuring Iggy Azalea).ogg

The portion of the song is not supporting critical commentary about elements of the song. The only justification appears to be that this is about the remix but elements of the song are not discussed and therefore WP:NFCC is not met >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 22:53, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : The Iggy Azalea version was released as single, we should have its cover art in the article. Sricsi (talk) 05:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since there is enough sourced critical commentary to justify its inclusion thereby passing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 04:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 10

File:Police Jury, Assumption Parish, 9 August 2023.png

I don't believe this file meets the NFCC - specifically, the following:

NFCC 1: No free equivalent. Unless photography/video recording is prohibited at all police jury meetings in Louisiana parishes, then a free equivalent could reasonably be contributed by someone who lives there, visits a meeting, and takes a photograph. Even if photography is prohibited by law, it wouldn't be unreasonable to expect that under freedom of information a photograph may be free.
NFCC 8 - contextual significance. A simple textual description of "these are similar to county boards in other states" would suffice, perhaps with an image of one of those boards if no free image of a police jury can be found. And even if it's considered contextually significant, a free image of a similar board from outside Louisiana (of which there are many), would suffice with a short text description of any differences (of which there are few).

Per WP:NFCC I'm bringing it to FFD for discussion to be deleted as not meeting the above criteria. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 05:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is no reason why a free image of one of these meetings cannot be taken. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:35, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:AzTV Logo 2019.svg

the actual logo resides on File:Azərbaycan Televiziya logo (2).png, whose genuinity can be checked via the website of aztv :3 əkrəm. 18:41, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons assuming it is below the threshold of originality. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:33, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Clearly {{PD-textlogo}}. Jonteemil (talk) 00:53, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Front.gif

Fails NFCC#8 and isn't the subject of commentary within the article (National Rally's stance on immigration is, but this does not require the image to explain) Traumnovelle (talk) 23:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 11

File:Wimbledon Poster 2025.jpg

Should be replaceable with the (non-free) official logo (this Jay Cubby 15:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024 NBA playoffs logo.jpeg

Same as File:2022 NBA playoffs logo.jpg. Delete per WP:NFC#UUI14. Jonteemil (talk) 22:03, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:CollinsPoloField.jpg

Fails WP:NFCCP#8. It doesn't significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission wouldn't be detrimental to that understanding. Jonteemil (talk) 22:09, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it fails NFCC#8 then pretty much ALL articles that show the venue location of an event fail as well. That argument simply says that NO event article increases the readers' understanding of the topic. Consequently, Collins Polo Field is an extremely notable venue when when it comes to the subject matter's history. That much should be clear since it was a venue that hosted decades of national level tournaments among other things. The photo clearly illustrates how and why it was a highly desired location for these events. Libro0 (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen a non-free photo of a venue before. I think oftentimes when a photo of a venue is placed in an article, the photo is free, not non-free. However, I now see that, despite there being fair use rationales, the file actually has a free license. Did you take the photo yourself and have the right to license it? In that case just remove all the fair use rationales and replace them with {{Information}} and this can be closed. Jonteemil (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was instructed by the chat forum to use the fair use rationales in order to use it in additional articles but I can certainly replace them with {{Information}}. Libro0 (talk) 17:41, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 12

File:Rutgers University seal.svg

Either, if deemed below c:COM:TOO US, replace the first FUR with {{Information}}, remove all other FURs and relicense file as {{PD-textlogo}}, or, if deemed above c:COM:TOO US, keep the FUR with Rutgers University and remove the other ones per WP:NFC#UUI17. Jonteemil (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 13

Today is July 13 2025. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 July 13 – (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===July 13===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.

The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

What not to list here

Instructions for discussion participation

Instructions for closing discussions

Old discussions

Discussions approaching conclusion

July 6

Recent nominations

July 7

July 8

July 9

July 10

July 11

July 12

July 13

Footer