User talk:Lil-unique1
It is currently 5:14 AM where this user lives.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is Lil-unique1's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 21 days  |
 | This user has tried and failed to take a wikibreak. |
Take care
[edit]
Aemanops8135 has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} or {{subst:Peace dove 2}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Clarifying something
[edit]Hi, @Lil-unique1. I saw your recent edit on Apt. (song), and something is not being clear to me. Namely, you're saying that, if a song peaks at number 5 at the Vietnam Hot 100 chart in July this year, while its Official SEA chart reports the same (just an example), I have to add the latter instead of the Billboard one, as happened in DTMF (song) similarly? Or not to add Billboard, even if the song didn't enter the IFPI chart? Just wanna verify, it could serve for my future plans. Santi (talk) 03:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @Santi Thanks for your message. Per WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and at WP:RECORDCHARTS, we decided that we shouldn't have multiple charts for each country unless there's a very good reason. The Billboard published charts are great for the US, Canada and Japan. But elsewhere the preference is to always use the chart which is nationally recognised, i.e. the chart that people in that country would recognise rather than what's internationally recognised. For example, in the UK, we have Official Charts Company who produce the the UK Singles Chart but Billboard also produce UK Songs. However, in the UK, UK Songs is not well known or recognised within our country. That's why we don't list both. A country like Vietnam is very small too so there is no need to include multiple charts. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 17:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Genre of SWAG
[edit]Hi Lil unique. I hope you'll have an interest on the talk page. Thanks. 2001:D08:2911:875F:1854:F302:FDED:648F (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
File:Renaissance LP Cover Art.png listed for discussion
[edit]
Good faith
[edit]Please remember to WP:Assume good faith, you clearly didn't here [1]. It was not "underhanded", I had no idea until I saw this that unused images are autodeleted, let alone that this image wasn't used elsewhere (I don't know why I thought it might've been, silly me). Anyways, I appreciate your fixing this. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:10, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @Estar8806:, thanks for responding. I can see how you think I didn't assume good faith and to be fair I probably leaned towards "this is deliberate sabotage". Given the number of files you're nominating, I thought you would have known that if a non-free cover art is not used in any article, it becomes "orphaned". orphaned media is automatically deleted after 7 days because remaining on Wikipedia servers but not in use is a violation of NFCC. I assumed you knew this as I've seen you nominating multiple files and it seems to be a space you're familiar acting in. However, next time, please don't remove files which have been nominated for deletion. It's good practice to post on a relevesnt page like the article talk page, user page of the person who uploaded, or the project page so that people can comment. There is a guide somwhere which mentions not removing files which are nominated for deletion. If a file is deleted then it appears as a red link in the article and will naturally be removed by process of normal editing.