Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skritter (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 05:21, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skritter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not noteable - fails WP:GNG. References from first AfD were very weak - not in-depth. Wikipedia is not a business directory for small unknown companiesWP:NOTDIRECTORY Iamchinahand (talk) 07:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Search is complicated by the fact that "Skritter" is a word in Norwegian, but in my WP:BEFORE all I could find were drive-by references and press-release material. Fails WP:GNG let alone WP:CORP. The Japan Today reference cited in the previous AFD might have been helpful but since it is now a 404 link I cannot assess it, but even if it was WP:SIGCOV it, by itself, would not be enough to sustain notability. FOARP (talk) 08:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:30, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unremarkable software, fails WP:GNG. -Zanhe (talk) 08:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG.--SalmanZ (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've added the Japan Today ref to the article. I'd also comment if the nom. was on article defence they would likely have gathered a tagging as a possible Wikipedia:Single-purpose account. The nom's contributions [1] appear to be one narrow focus of AfD for Japanese/Chinese langauge learning ... with little other contributions from the account ... which may be a concern.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.