Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skritter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 10:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skritter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:N for startup company tagged for notability for nine months. At this point promotional only. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Seems like an important topic. If kept, it needs to be rewritten. Jeremjay 24 14:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable subject with sources. I found these: [1] [2] with less than a minute of searching. Sunshine4921 (talk) 14:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Newswire reference is self-promotional (pay-to-post), so it shouldn't be given weight. Is japantoday.com a reliable source? If not, you may want to look for more evidence of notability. — HowardBGolden (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Doesn't look over-promotional to me and does seem to have enough coverage. Peridon (talk) 19:43, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK - needs more reliable refs Peridon (talk) 21:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Looks like an acceptable stub. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 11:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.