User:DatGuy/Admin
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 168.232.75.26 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- 76.147.168.222 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1345 (LTA 1345, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:387:f:7e17::c (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- 68.148.137.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1344 (Excessive blank lines, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- 162.33.235.50 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| Attack pages | 0 |
| Copyright violations | 3 |
| Hoaxes | 0 |
| Vandalism | 0 |
| User requested | 6 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 2 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 0 |
| Possibly contested candidates | 4 |
| Other candidates | 15 |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 15 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 348 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently
Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
- Ancestrysucks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "sucks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
- Flynncocking69 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Print hybrid (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Draft:Hybrid Printing with the Digital Squeegee 4000. jlwoodwa (talk) 14:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- TGW Media (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:Diff/1292901035. jlwoodwa (talk) 15:17, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yardstech (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See Special:AbuseLog/40927622. jlwoodwa (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- RTV7.nl (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. (rtv7.nl). Annh07 (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Onetizz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Username that implies shared use. See user page. Tarlby (t) (c) 17:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hospivision npc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). See their sandbox article. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 19:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: High level of vandalism and warring about awards, editing back and forth by fans of other artists JKHungary (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Per contribs, couple of accounts has already exceeded 3RR threshold and also semi-protection wouldn't be sufficient hence suggesting ECP. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I’m blocking the 3RR violators as I find them. A whole bunch of new accounts and IPs. I’ll probably add semi protection once I get through all this stuff. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:31, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, harassment and sockpuppetry. Kajmer05 (talk) 11:49, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There have been a total of 16 reverted edits of IP addresses and newly registered users with little to no edit history since the previous page protection expired a little more than a year ago, so I am requesting that the page is protected yet again due to persistent disruptive editing. Turaids (talk) 12:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Partial-rangeblocked for 3 months. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Relevant to the recent conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which is under community authorized sanctions and also classified as a contentious topic. The Leopard 2 article already got extended confirmed restriction due to these reasons.
The following article in the title, along with the T-64, T-72 and T-80, should be, in my opinion, subject to the extended confirmed protection which one of of the restrictions listed by the sanctions itself.
79.191.225.126 (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection lifted and IPs went right back to adding unsourced content. CNMall41 (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2a0d:b201:1040::/48 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Over the last couple of days, multiple anonymous editors have changed the flag of the new Southampton manager Will Still who has both Belgian (place of birth) and English nationalities. It alternates between England and Belgium then back to England. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 17:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Chronic addition of unsourced content to BLP. Page previously protected, now the same editing has re-ensued. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 17:40, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Previous Disruptive Editing by several ips used by blocked ip 50.76.45.73 has resumed, please protect for much longer. Untamed1910 (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Mass removal of cited content both from users and unregistered IPs. Helper201 (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Page subject to WP:CT/AP recreated against consensus established at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haz al-Din. Am also asking if redirecting to related page (like with American Communist Party (Haz Al-Din)) or draftifying (like with repeated recreations of pages on associated party (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Communist Party, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:American Communist Party, Draft:American Communist Party(2024), Draft:American Communist Party (2024), Draft:American Communist Party)) are appropriate. Thank you for your time and consideration. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:28, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: This is a contentious page, as it pertains to a member of the band Kneecap (also a contentious page and semi-protected). There are some edits from an unknown IP trying to introduce elements or change wordings into unclaimed statements. I think that for the same reasons why Kneecap is semi-protected, this one should too, at least for a while. Afonso Dimas Martins (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – chronic addition of unsourced content due to transfer rumours. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – chronic addition of unsourced content due to transfer rumours. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 19:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated recent BLP violations from multiple IPs. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: It has been 11 years since this page was semi protected. The tournament itself held 15 years ago, so I don't think the page will be very popular or vandalized. Also, articles about the next two editions—2014 FIFA World Cup & 2018 FIFA World Cup—are not protected. Therefore, I suggest we cn try to remove the protection and see what happened. The Seal F1 (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable to me. Could you try discussion with the protecting admin first? If they decline or take more than a few days to respond, your welcome to ask me to review or re-request here. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:26, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. The administrator who protected that page has made only a few edits over the past month — all of them related to "cleaning up" their talk page, so I'm not sure if this is a good idea. That's why Im asking here.The Seal F1 (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- It's not uncommon for admins to be inactive for a month but still respondent to pings. I figured we should attempt a ping. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll try. The Seal F1 (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- It's not uncommon for admins to be inactive for a month but still respondent to pings. I figured we should attempt a ping. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hi. The administrator who protected that page has made only a few edits over the past month — all of them related to "cleaning up" their talk page, so I'm not sure if this is a good idea. That's why Im asking here.The Seal F1 (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Please unprotect the article 2600:387:15:6910:0:0:0:1 (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:51, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
I would like to request that The neutral source mentioned in casualities and losses on Indian side isn't credible enough, the author seems to b referring to Pakistan's initial claims of 5 indian aircrafts shot down which has been challenged around globe due to lack of evidence. Other sources like Washington post and Reuters claims atleast 2 indian jets shot down which is in line with the wider neutral international narrative and evidence present. Hence, I would request to change the claims in the section and cite these sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PrinceVK5 (talk • contribs) 04:44, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
I want to create a new article or subtopic, labelled, "History of Fraud". The reason that I want to do this, is because according to the legal definition of securities fraud, Elon Musk has done exactly that. For example, the 420 funding secured tweet, met the threshold for securities fraud per the Federal Judge overseeing the trial: "No reasonable jury could find that Mr. Musk did not act recklessly given his clear knowledge of the discussions," the judge added. https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/court-says-musk-recklessly-tweeted-that-funding-secured-taking-tesla-private-2022-05-11/
The entire reason that the 420 funding secured tweet was made, was for one purpose. To cause short sellers to lose money. Elon Musk had been threatening them for literally months. When he did that, short sellers lost billions of dollars. The only way to manipulate the stock price was to make a knowingly false statement, and Tesla at the time was about 6 weeks from bankruptcy unless they ramped the Model 3.
None of this is documented in his wikipedia page - in fact, the 420 tweet is a literal footnote. For example, saying every single year "I really believe that later this year we'll have Full Self Driving robotaxis" to pump a stock price and keep it elevated is securities fraud. Why does he do this? If tesla has an elevated stock price, he can pay people with stock because the company itself has no cash flows. the Q4 2023 increase in net income was fraud. That's been extensively covered, etc, etc. Editor111111112 (talk) 18:27, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Recklessness does not equate to fraud (which has to be deliberate), and it is not our place to impute motive where others have declined to do so. We cannot, and will not, entertain this particular edit barring much more compelling sources explicitly calling Musk's actions fraud. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:06, 29 May 2025 (UTC) |
| 6 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC) |