Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Fashion or clothing. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Fashion|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Fashion or clothing. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fashion/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Fashion

Joss Sackler

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defamatory description of a private individual. There are no references for this individual beyond tabloids. Historyexpert2 (talk) 03:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Historyexpert2 (talk) 03:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, Fashion, Canada, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:16, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Plenty of coverage around fashion launches and the controversy surrounding her husband [1], Forbes staff story [2], [3]. Could perhaps use a rewrite, but I see notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A "private individual" that presents a fashion show under their name, isn't private. Oaktree b (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A quick look at the article shows that the nominator is very incorrect. This is not a "private individual" and publications like Town & Country (magazine) and Vanity Fair (magazine) are reliable sources, not "tabloids." Asparagusstar (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Annette Roque

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTINHERITED, from Matt Lauer. No independent notability. Iljhgtn (talk) 22:50, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Fashion, Netherlands, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Any coverage i find is about the divorce, or "Who is Matt Lauer's wife" articles, it seems any notability goes through him... Nothing to show notability outside of being the wife of a journalist. Oaktree b (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Chinese fashion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article which is pretty much a personal essay full of WP:SYNTH, and much of the article doesn't pass WP:VERIFY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:05, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and China. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:11, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is yet another low-quality student essay ("this paper delves" lol) that, as nominator states, is largely unsourced synthesis/original research. Chinese clothing#Modern Fashion could use expansion and even a split, but not in this format. Reywas92^Talk 20:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cockade of the Philippines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no "national cockade" of the Philippines - either legally defined or widely documented. The only source on the article is a 1898miniaturas.com blog maintained by miniature enthusiasts who assumes the cockade is a common feature of Katipunan revolutionaries hats from an infographic (which to be fair is from the Malacanang Museum). This article is also full of original research and WP:SYNTH making conjectures that the cockade became less fashionable due to the American era Flag Code. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Fashion, and Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Weak sourcing with only a single word mention from a miniatures website. Agnieszka653 (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Seems to have been worn by either the Spanish or American military in the country [4], nothing about the Philippines having their own version of a cockade. Oaktree b (talk) 15:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per all above. Loibird90 08:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Sweeney Has Great (American Eagle) Jeans

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. There is no indication so far that this is anything but a WP:NOTNEWS WP:TOOSOON story, and can at best be merged to the company. Companies have advertisements with celebrities all the time. It's something that Wikipedia is becoming, but we don't need an article on every culture-war story from the US or UK just because there's a hundred opinion columns over a week or so. The news coverage by news wires such as Reuters is unremarkable compared to any other advertising campaign [5]. Then you get websites that need clicks and engagement such as The Guardian (first example I saw) [6] which cites several anonymous Twitter and TikTok users hating the advertisement, and then a few at the end who did like it. Completely unremarkable. This story is just the mirror image of online right-wingers throwing a fit when an advertisement has somebody non-white, or LGBT - certainly that is not something that needs dignifying with a Wikipedia article. The only possible exception to that would be the Bud Light boycott, which stretched for months and had an impact on sales and shares. This hasn't [7] Unknown Temptation (talk) 22:45, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Fashion, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:43, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: I agree with WP:TOOSOON. This needs evidence that the event has WP:LASTING impact or has WP:PERSISTENCE. I'm also okay with Delete. — 🌊PacificDepths (talk) 06:13, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify. Too soon & not notable. Agree with the above comments. Wikipedia doesn't need to turn into the "Chronicle of EVERY Celebrity Ad & Commercial". Just the campaigns that have an impact on culture & sales (for example, Coke's I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony) campaign or Daisy (advertisement)). - Shearonink (talk) 13:12, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge content into American Eagle Outfitters & have a Redirect to AEO. Changed my mind. Agree with Patre23. Still think TOOSOON & NOTNOTABLE (yet). - Shearonink (talk) 15:52, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters. This only seeks to promote the company and its ad campaign. Patre23 (talk) 14:59, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This ad continues generate widespread press in major global publications. The deletion nomination appears premature. It would have been far better to wait two or so weeks to allow for proper assessment of sources. Thriley (talk) 18:10, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with American Eagle Outfitters. While I do think in my opinion that this campaign is noteworthy, I believe it is only worth enough to be mentioned in the company's Wikipedia article and that a separate one is not needed. Nguyk (talk) 21:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It has generated significant coverage and has value as a notable marketing case study that benefits from a short article. Companies often have adverts with celebrities, but this one has been covered significantly more than most. Folkezoft (talk) 09:21, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this is exactly the kind of thing that users rely on Wikipedia for -- neutral information. Tony Winton (talk) 13:21, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters#Sydney Sweeney ad campaign. Vegan416 (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the the American Eagle article. The controversy makes no sense out of context. Bearian (talk) 18:24, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters. I think much of the information in this article could be housed in the ad campaign controversy section – if this has WP:LASTING impact, the article can be easily be brought back. Nomader (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters. The current kerfuffle is reminiscent of the Calvin Klein campaign with Brooke Shields, which is addressed in context in the clothing brand's article and her article, not as a stand-alone article. In the same way, this information is better presented in the context of the company. Schazjmd (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters. Natg 19 (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge. WP:RECENTISM. Total storm in a tea cup, it will die soon. The MAGA crowd love to amplify the things that "liberals" are allegedly "offended" by and make it into a culture war thing. It's just a jeans ad. Sweeney as far as I can tell is fairly apolitical. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 09:21, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters#Sydney Sweeney ad campaign for now. I will note that we have a standalone article on the Kendall Jenner Pepsi commercial, which also drew widespread criticism, though I don't recall the White House weighing in on that one. If this case stays in public attention after a few weeks, then the article can be restored. Paprikaiser (talk) 19:50, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters- This has generated widespread discussion, debate and discourse but this is really about American Eagle and this should be covered on their page. It is a controversy related to that company and it should be covers within that context. I can understand why right now some would want there to be a separate article for it. But people will stop talking about this and will move on. Before we know it there will be some other controversial ad that everyone will be talking about. Will we need an article for that situation? Probably not. But it just seems logical to cover all of this on the American Eagle page. NevadaExpert (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to American Eagle Outfitters#Sydney Sweeney ad campaign for now, WP:TOOSOON, no objection to revisiting this in six months if the topic is still making the rounds or escalates. —Locke Cole • t • c 01:28, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into American Eagle Outfitters#Sydney Sweeney ad campaign, this article is massively affected by recentism. This is one ad and thus will probably not be a significant event in history, likely not remembered and therefore this article should be deleted. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:01, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or, at most, Draftify. This is plainly notable at this point as even the White House has responded, I would argue it's a clear case of WP:NOTTOOSOON as sources clearly exist even with just a quick Google search of the campaign title. -Jessica3801 (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Rag mag-type gossip that will almost have no notability past the next news cycle. Controversy also appears to be wildly overhyped. SickNWristed (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with the the American Eagle article (although most of the required information is already there), the advert itself isn't independently notable. JeffUK 20:48, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a WP:LASTING story, social media controversy that will be forgotten in the next week FMSky (talk) 04:20, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Much like the Kendall Jenner Pepsi Ad or the Dylan Mulvaney/Bud Light promotion this marketing campaign (and the reaction to it) has achieved cultural escape velocity. Given the direct responses from senior US political figures (incl. Trump), numerous newspaper editorials, and society at large, I find it really hard to believe that this won't leave a lasting cultural imprint. I also suspect that this will be studied by marketing firms around the world for years (whether positively or negatively remains to be seen). Either way, WP:LASTING cautions us "It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable." CASalt (talk) 05:34, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to American Eagle Outfitters. Too soon and not notable in its its own right. I wasn't even aware of this brand until I heard about the ad campaign.

Inpops (talk) 13:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This advertisement has actually drawn so much attention that talk radio shows such as the The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show and even President Trump has chimed in on this one [8] [9] [10]. When something gets massive coverage in the news we typically consider WP:GNG is not only met but the article stands on its own. Junglecat (talk) 17:29, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
President Trump chimes in about everything. Not every single thing Donald Trump says deserves an article. Vanilla Wizard 💙 22:20, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Even If Trump didn’t say a word about this ad, it sure is a lightning rod in the media. Quote: ‘'...Industry analysts are saying that the ad represents a cultural turning point away from hyper-wokeism and towards more traditional forms of advertising.’’ [11] That jeans company stock is up. It sure beats the goofy Bud Light fiasco. These are lessons learned in business. This article of this ad is a keeper no matter which angle you see it. Junglecat (talk) 14:12, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. It makes more sense as a part of American Eagle Outfitters. Somewhere in the "Controversy" section... Doctorstrange617 (talk) 20:15, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and/or redirect to American Eagle Outfitters#Sydney Sweeney ad campaign for now. Borderline imaginary controversy; the ratio of one side decrying the alleged outrage from the other side : the amount of actual outrage is wildly disproportionate. There is no controversy, it is a non-factor that the White House responded. This is just gossip, not encyclopedic content. Vanilla Wizard 💙 22:20, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This ad campaign has already had an impact on sales and the share price. Whether it stretches on for months is unknown at this point. Scotty1141 (talk) 22:54, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into American Eagle Outfitters#Sydney Sweeney ad campaign should not be reliable or notorious 200.46.55.111 (talk) 23:45, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge/redirect to American Eagle Outfitters § Sydney Sweeney ad campaign per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:RECENTISM. Some1 (talk) 02:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and I'm saying this with a very heavy heart. I am just enraged by the deplorable stupidity of this pseudo-controversy about a non-subject which should not even have registered anywhere in the first place, but unfortunately it has become notable. Even the international media are talking about it now. So I guess it warrants a page, if only as an example of the utter and complete idiocy of some media controversies in the current "culture wars/social media" atmosphere. Psychloppos (talk) 07:27, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Category:Advertising campaigns which chronicles the existence of hundreds of other advertising campaign Wikipedia articles. This one has become stand-alone notable per international media coverage. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Many of those are established advertising campaigns, not single adverts, a lot of those aren't notable either! Just because other stuff exists doesn't lend any weight to this specific article. JeffUK 13:48, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And many are single adverts. The weight is the fact that individual advertisements often receive Wikipedia articles if proven notable, as this one has, and that having an article about this ad is nothing unusual per Wikipedia inclusion guidelines. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prestige Hong Kong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article that has been effectively unsourced from its creation in 2007. Not finding anything on a Google search (string: ["prestige hong kong" -prestigeonline.com]) or anything passable as a source in history (SOPA is 404-compliant, https://web.archive.org/web/20160304052630/http://www.sinarmasprintawards.com/english/all.asp seems thoroughly broken). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 06:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Wine, Fashion, Popular culture, and Hong Kong. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's unfortunate that the article has been completely unsourced for so long, and a cursory search of any independent secondary coverage turns up blank. Even then, I would support a case of TNT-ing and starting over given that it's almost exclusively original research. GuardianH 13:59, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Seno, Alexandra A. (2008-05-17). "The Glamour And The Gloss". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 2025-07-26. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  The article notes: "Wearing three-inch stilettos and a giant Chanel ring on one hand, Anne Lim-Chaplain strides purposefully to a shelf in her office. The managing director of the lifestyle magazine Prestige Hong Kong picks up a prototype of her third-anniversary issue, due on newsstands in September, and tosses the 800-page volume on her desk, where it lands with a thud. Even compared with 2007's record profits, advertising for the first quarter of the year is up 41 percent. ... Peter Comparelli, editor of Prestige Hong Kong, says that he aims to uphold the standards of fairness, quality and good design, but believes readers understand who butters his bread. ... The approach is paying off handsomely: this month Comparelli's publication, which has a circulation of 30,000, offers 328 pages of beautiful frocks, as well as articles on recent soirées, the new Mercedes sedan and fine wines."
2. "The World: Hong Kong - CR Media and 3cm launch Prestige in Hong Kong". Campaign. 2005-06-10. Archived from the original on 2025-07-26. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  The article notes: "Prestige magazine is set to launch in Hong Kong in a joint venture between the publishers CR Media and 3cm Media. The magazine, which blends luxury lifestyle content and fashion with interests and social issues, is being launched as a direct competitor to Tatler. The editor has been named as George Paddy, the former editor of Cathay Pacific's Discovery magazine, while Brian Chow will be the publisher."
3. Eaton, Matthew (2008-08-10). "Prestige lands with a 3 kilo thud". Marketing-Interactive. Archived from the original on 2025-07-26. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  The article notes: "Prestige Hong Kong will celebrate its third anniversary next month by giving readers a whopping 808-page special issue, weighing in at more than 3kg. Published by Hong Kong-based entrepreneur Brian Chow, the magazine has seen a five-fold increase in advertising revenue, driven by luxury advertisers. The magazine's circulation has also grown by 50% to 30,000 copies each month."
4. Li, Benjamin (2011-02-17). "Peter Comparelli returns to Prestige Hong Kong as Paul Ehrlich resigns". Campaign. Archived from the original on 2025-07-26. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  The article notes: "Paul Ehrlich, the current editor of Prestige Hong Kong, an affluent lifestyle magazine published by CR Media in Singapore, will resign from the company for family related reasons, while Peter Comparelli, its former editor who left the magazine in 2008, will return to fill the editor’s post. ... CR Media took over publishing duties for Prestige Hong Kong in January 2010, pulling the license from 3cm Media."
5. La Rosa, Erin (2012-09-19). "Kim & Khloé Kardashian Cover Prestige Magazine and Dish About Having Children and Finding "The One"". E!. Archived from the original on 2025-07-26. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
  The article notes: "Two is always better than one! At least that's what the folks at Hong Kong's edition of Prestige magazine must have thought when they paired up Kim and Khloé Kardashian to be their cover girls for the September Issue. The shoot features the two sisters in white—one of their fave colors—with Kim in a lace dress with plunging neckline and Khloé donning a sexy fitted tube dress."
6. Less significant coverage:
  1. "Asia's luxury infatuation under pressure during economic woes". Fashion Network. Agence France-Presse. 2008-10-14. Archived from the original on 2025-07-26. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
    The article provides one sentence of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Glossy magazines heave under the weight of high-end adverts, with a recent 808-page edition of Hong Kong-based lifestyle monthly "Prestige" tipping the scales at a handbag strap-ripping three kilograms (6.6 pounds)."
  2. "Dancing With Clouds". Macau Daily Times. 2013-10-11. p. P15.
    The article notes: "With the sound of bossa nova playing in the background, I grab a copy of Prestige Hong Kong magazine and start to read and relax, sitting back in my chair at Grand Hyatt Macau’s Lobby Lounge. On the cover is Monica Bellucci, with her full red lips and sultry smoky eyes, staring out of the magazine and looking like a goddess. ... As my fingers keep flipping through Prestige, one of the Singaporean dishes I have ordered arrives."
  3. Gottlieb, Richard, ed. (2015) [2000]. Nations of the World: A Political, Economic & Business Handbook (14 ed.). Amenia, New York: Grey House Publishing. p. 802. ISBN 978-1-61925-288-2. Retrieved 2025-07-26 – via Internet Archive.
    The book notes: "Prestige Hong Kong (www.prestigehk.com), is a glossy lifestyle and society magazine ..."
  4. Noonan, Tim (2016-12-30). "Opinion | From the editor's office to the baseball field, Peter Comparelli was a man for all seasons". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 2025-07-26. Retrieved 2025-07-26.
    The article notes: "He left the media business temporarily to work for the Hong Kong government before coming back for two stints as editor at Prestige Hong Kong."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Prestige Hong Kong to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 09:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The "Less significant coverage" bits are not coverage at all. They are just passing mentions. Geschichte (talk) 15:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, could we have other editors review the recently found sources to see if they contribute to establishing notability?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Maybe the first two sources listed above, I'm unsure about the rest, but we have found enough coverage to meet notability requirements. Oaktree b (talk) 13:19, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sotbella

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Absolutely unnotable brand and fails to meet NCORP. The sources are undisclosed paid placements and puff pieces. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Chanel Dsouza (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:53, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:11, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The subject meet WP:ORG and WP:GNG. There is some coverage in independent, non-trivial sources such as:
- Vogue India** – coverage of Sotbella's capsule collection with commentary on Indian heritage ([Vogue India](https://www.vogue.in/promotion/sotbellas-new-capsule-collection-celebrates-indian-heritage)).
- Business Today** – mentions the brand in the context of emerging Indian fashion businesses. Along with this the existing sources in the article helps to meet notability.While the article currently requires cleanup for tone and improved referencing, deletion may be premature given the potential for development. — 111.92.121.62 (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 13:35, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. The brand was "launched" in August 2023 and these sources are simply regurgitating the same information provided by the founder about herself and the new brand. Fails ORGIND and NCORP. Perhaps the founder is notable enough for an article? HighKing⁺⁺ 21:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:39, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist; a direct in-depth assessment of the two sources picked out by 111.92.121.62 may be helpful in establishing consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:37, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fashion proposed deletions (PROD)

Annu Patel (via WP:PROD on 6 November 2024)