Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission or Help:Permanent link.
This page is under extended confirmed protection, but non-EC users may edit its subpages.

    Requests for permissions
    Shortcuts

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 01:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Microsoft Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

    Administrators

    Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Autopatrolled

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:SDGB1217

    Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Can I have autopatrolled rights re granted, as they have now expired? Thank you! SDGB1217 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @Femke would you like to take this one as you granted the temporary rights? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:SuperSwift

    I've been an editor on the English Wikipedia since 2017 and have created over 100 articles. Being autopatrolled will reduce the backlog on articles needing reviews. Thanks for the consideration. SuperSwift (talk) 19:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) On the plus side, no article deletions since 2022. I took a quick look at the three most recent recent creations: Lagos Marriott Hotel has incorrect coordinates (the map location is nowhere near Lagos) and the sources are rewritten press releases. Massey Street Children's Hospital is WP:OVERCATegorized: if it's in a category for hospitals in Lagos, then it's already nested in categories for hospitals in Nigeria and hospitals and doesn't need to be in those categories too. John Randle Centre for Yoruba Culture and History is missing bold text in its lead sentence. These suggest your page creations will still benefit from being patrolled. Dclemens1971 (talk) 04:04, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done. I have to agree with Dclemens1971's assessment here. Aoidh (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Bookworm-ce

    Prolific creator of biography articles who appears to understand the notability guidelines. My random selection of articles they had recently created showed no other issues of note, though I would recommend they create associated talk pages for their work. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    User:Czarking0

    Citation and grammar edits Czarking0 (talk) 04:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ScienceDawns

    I'm currently working on some general maintenance of articles related to the theory of general relativity and would like some extra tools for automatic syntax fixing, etc. Some articles like this one could use some semi-automated tender love and care. A recent rewrite I did here might improve with some finishing touches too. ScienceDawns (talk) 08:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, although I'm not sure how useful you'll find AWB for that...you may want to look into something like WPCleaner. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:OpalYosutebito

    I feel like I've improved as an editor since my rights were revoked in July 2024 (due to a long series of impulsive mistakes I made and not checking my work hard enough), and since I last tried to apply in November 2024. I've tried slowing down on the editing, especially with Rater, as Pppery pointed out.

    Anyway, the main reason why I wanted to reapply for AWB is because cleaning up Category:Pages using infobox Russian inhabited locality with unknown parameters has been rather tedious; I recently found a bunch of unnecessary parameters (most notably, "date") that I believe can be removed more efficiently if I had access to the application. However, I will try to remove parameters (or use AWB in general) as a last resort (like if the params are truly redundant), and instead try to fix them if possible. OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I also found Category:Pages using infobox university with the image name parameter, which should be an easy fix, as it mostly requires changing one parameter to another - OpalYosutebito (talk) 10:15, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery for awareness charlotte 👸♥ 09:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I've been aware of this for a while but haven't had the time and motivation to look into it. Any other admin is welcome to do so without expecting some sort of response from me. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I hope you're feeling better soon :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Reflecting back on this I think the Wikipedia:Administrative_action_review#March 2025 revocation of my AutoWikiBrowser rights by Pppery scenario has made me lose motivation to process this page generally. I'll probably come back here eventually, and another admin will get to this in due time if I don't. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You're saying all the right things, OpalYosutebito, so  Done. But I strongly encourage you to move very cautiously: you can expect the right to be revoked without warning if there are further issues, and if that happens people are unlikely to give you a third chance. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Got it. I'll do my best not to screw this one up! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AllCatsAreGrey

    I am requesting access to AWB to help me efficiently fix typos and clean up articles that I find with the "random article" button. AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 21:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    AllCatsAreGrey, any specific examples of widespread typos or other things you'd need AWB to fix? You probably wouldn't find it very useful for cleaning up a particular article. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, and thanks for the reply. Specifically, I plan to create lists and use tools like RegExTypoFix to perform tedious but helpful edits more efficiently. I've only been actively editing for a few months and completely understand if more experience is expected before access is granted. That said, I've read and understood the rules, and I'll be sure to review every edit carefully and avoid making insignificant changes. – AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 00:23, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done, but you're indeed right on the edge in terms of experience, so move cautiously. In particular make sure you're only using AWB for things that are unambiguous mistakes rather than just differences in style. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ

    can I use AutoWikiBrowser on the English Wikipedia. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 05:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 05:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    What do you want to use it for? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 11:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    For CheckWiki. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done: I'm skeptical that this would be a good idea, especially with a previous right revoked for misuse/non-responsiveness. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:46, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Akbarali

    It is to following things in malayalam wikipedia such as correct common typos and grammatical errors, Standardizing article formatting and layout and Updating outdated links and references. Akbarali (talk) 03:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done: you have 192 mainspace edits (161 of them non-automated), which is below the minimums listed at the top of the page. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Opm581

    I would like to use AutoWikiBrowser for adding wikilinks to articles. I might also use it for fixing typos. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 04:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! Opm581 (talk | he/him) 00:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Valorrr

    I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser to edit Wikipedia and help fix minor and major errors with automated programming, I feel like I could do a lot more with it than just regular editing. Valorrr (talk) 21:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Microwave Anarchist

    Use regular expressions to find and replace wikitext on football club season articles, in order to comply with MOS:FLAG Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Please make sure to use edit summaries for anything you do in AWB. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Twistedmath

    I want to get into rewriting articles more (most of my edits are vandalism reverting and PCR)

    AWB, will be able to help me make larger and accurate contributions, with great speed. I understand many en-Wikipedia policies through RCP and have gathered the privilege of rollback and pending changes reviewing through my several hundred contributions.

    Thanks and happy editing! twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 18:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done as you're a bit below the minimums listed at the top of the page, particularly with only 54 non-automated mainspace edits. Improving articles manually is the best way to get relevant experience and to see whether you need the right—everyone wants great speed, but it generally works out much better if you start slow! Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Event coordinator

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Librarian Daireon

    I am a librarian who will be running an editathon for my small liberal arts college on April 3rd and 4th from 9-4:30 PM. This is the third year we have done this, but I am new to the position and the event. Let me know if you need any other information from me. Librarian Daireon (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Who was the previous coordinator? Were they also granted event coordinator rights? (Not a strict requirement to answer this, but it will be easier to review by cross-checking what was done before versus reviewing from scratch). * Pppery * it has begun... 19:49, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello Pppery, I don't know the previous research and instruction librarians Wikipedia account name and don't know if they were granted event coordinator rights. Sorry I couldn't be more help! Librarian Daireon (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    u/Kelseyem was her name! Librarian Daireon (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Kelseyem wasn't granted Event Coordinator rights. Special:UserRights/Kelseyem shows that. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:27, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Cool beans, thanks for your help! ill just run it through the Programs and Events dashboard. Librarian Daireon (talk) 13:31, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Tashmetu

    I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([1]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 14:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:IdanST

    I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 18:22, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    File mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Mass message sender

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    New page reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Rahmatula786

    I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors.

    I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations.

    I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.

    Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 17:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rahmatula786: What do you mean by though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time – did you have another account before this one? – Joe (talk) 08:42, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No Sir, Before creating this account, I used to edit Wikipedia anonymously and made various contributions. However, after realizing the benefits of having a registered account, I created this one and have since been actively editing and contributing regularly. Rahmatula786 (talk) 09:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) Why did you reject this submission?[5] topic is notable.. it's seems you don't have knowledge about notability guidelines. Hellorld4 (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I have replied on your talk page. Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Junbeesh

    I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Upjav

    I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    As a further note, I'd like to review new pages. Upjav (talk) 02:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JustARandomEditor123

    I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Itemirus

    Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Yutsi

    I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cyrobyte

    I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Mekomo

    I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 14:40, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rosguill do you want this one? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    HJ Mitchell I’m generally fine with other admins reviewing track records for people whom I conferred trial runs to (and arguably the extra set of eyes is a good thing). My activity has been rather inconsistent lately in particular due to other demand on my time so I would expect others to step in more signed, Rosguill talk 22:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:JacktheBrown

    Hi, explaining briefly: I would like to be able to contribute in this area. Thanks in advance. JacktheBrown (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @JacktheBrown I nearly declined your request outright thinking you were a new editor then realised you have 82k edits. I would expect an editor of that experience to figure out that new requests go at the bottom but aside from that, would you like to write a more detailed statement? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:23, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @HJ Mitchell: I would like to be able to contribute in this area (help is always good) and I think I can do it well; I don't know what else to write except that I would like to help. I've a lot of experience in the website, so although this is a slightly different area, I learn quickly. JacktheBrown (talk) 22:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CSMention269

    I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 04:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:MallardTV

    Hello, I would like to request the New Page Reviewer user right. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since May 2022 and have made a variety of edits, including content creation, copyediting, and reverting vandalism. I have also patrolled recent changes and worked on improving articles related to history, Type 1 diabetes, and various general topics. Additionally, I understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, reliable sourcing requirements, and article layout conventions. I am familiar with the CSD and AfC, as well as most other things. Thank you for considering my request. MallardTV Talk to me! 03:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Page mover

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Habst

    I'm an experienced editor with years of history on Wikipedia and I've recently been getting more into page moving (mostly to fix disambiguation-related issues). The issue is that increasingly I see that a redirect already exists at the intended destination, so it would be very helpful for me to have the page mover permission so I can resolve these issues efficiently. I have moved over 500 pages so far and have initiated several requested moves as well. I don't intend to engage in any controversial moves and if any of mine are contested I'll immediately revert and go to RM.

    Thanks, Habst (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Pending changes reviewer

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Bruhpedia

    I've been editing for a long time and understand Wikipedia's policies and goals. I especially like to help out at pages which have a lot of enthusiastic edits by knowledgeable people who might not understand Wikipedia's format and goals, making them perfect candidates for pending changes protection.

    I think pending changes reviewer rights would be the perfect way to help separate the wheat from the chaff and help our newest editors participate and make a difference while maintaining our high standards. Bruhpedia (talk) 20:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Chippla360

    I need the Pending changes right, I patrol through serval articles on Wikipedia Atimes I’m experienced, without much been said, I want to support. Chippla360 (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has had an account for 28 days. — MusikBot talk 18:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Wojtekpolska1013

    I have read the WP:PCCRITERIA and I believe that I meet them. I sometimes see pending edits waiting for approval on articles, and I believe that I could do this job myself. wojtekpolska1013 [talk page] 09:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 29 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 09:40, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Wafflerrs

    I have encountered instances where the ability to review pending changes to articles would prove useful in the prevention of vandalism and would help changes in good faith be accepted more quickly. Having the pending changes reviewer right would allow me to assist new editors with learning the formatting and customs of Wikipedia, and allow me to more effectively prevent vandalism and disruption to articles. I have read all policy regarding the pending changes reviewer right. Thank you for your consideration. wafflerrs talk! 02:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Srimant ROSHAN

    I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Rollback

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:TheM1sty

    I'm requesting rollback rights to speed up my fight against vandalism. I have about 1,000 edits involving reverting vandalism. I'm also interested in tools such as AntiVandal. TheM1sty (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Aoidh (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Osmo Lundell

    I have taken up patrolling recent changes and clear vandalism prevension / sourceless BLP-edits in en-wiki too. I have enough experience of the tool through fi-wiki, where I am a rollbacker, pending changes reviewer and ”page stabilzer” (I think the group closest to it here was called editor?). I know I have under 200 edits too now, but my interest at the time here is vandalism prevention which is hard and takes multiple edits (causes spam in recent changes) without rollback-tool. I would ask for sysops to look at my well trusted global status and experience. Thank you! Osmo Lundell (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 84 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 21:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Osmo Lundell: Twinkle's red "vandalism" button should revert consecutive edits by the same user in the same way that rollback does. It appears when you view the diff (noting that you have Twinkle enabled). Have you tried doing that? – JensonSL (SilverLocust) 04:56, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey! Thanks for metting me know, I thought that using that button would need the rollback user group. Good to know if it works just like that for everyone! I would still leave my request pending, because rollback is still useful from the recent changes view etc. --Osmo Lundell hey 07:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:VortexPhantom

    Hi, I am requesting rollback rights to help combat vandalism and disruptive edits more effectively. I have been patrolling recent changes for the past 30 days, focusing on identifying and reverting vandalism, test edits, and other unconstructive changes. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies, including WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, and WP:NPOV.

    I really wanted to improve Wikipedia by my small contribution. I understand the importance of using rollback responsibly. This permission would allow me to respond more efficiently to inappropriate edits.

    I want to also say that I made some silly mistakes in the starting of my patrolling. However, I learnt from them and make sure that they won't happen again. Such as reverting edits that are already reverted, that mistakes you can see on my past contributions.

    Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if any additional information is needed. ⚡ VortexPhantom • Talk 07:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi,
    Please any administrator review my request. I have already waited a lot, and now I likely to lose my patience too. Please get it done ASAP. It will encourage me to do more quality edits to Wikipedia and help it in improving. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 01:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Nyeubim

    I would like to use rollback perms to more effectively fight vandals on Wikipedia, I am hoping to use Huggle to do this. 𝕟𝕪𝕖𝕦𝕓𝕚𝕞 (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     Automated comment This user has 199 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 19:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Template editor

    Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions&oldid=1181725208"