Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsh Beniwal (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh Beniwal

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GNG. The references on the page and what I find online all fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA with bylines indicating they are press pieces or have no editorial oversight. CNMall41 (talk) 05:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 05:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Everyone I would like to participate in this discussion on wether to keep this article or not, Firstly I have created this article Harsh Beniwal because he is a popular youtuber in India, and his YouTube channel have more than 16 Million subscribers (including his second channel) and also his views are more than 1.8 Billion, which is a huge number I think and he also worked in a Superhit Indian film Student of the Year 2. I also believe that he has not proper coverage in Indian News Media, but I think that he may be notable for wikipedia. Thank you WikiAnchor10 (talk) 06:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no have any reliable source, some source are gossip material Worldiswide (talk) 03:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Deleted in previous AFDs so Soft Deletion is not an option here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not much coverage in reliable sources and views/subscribers don't really contribute to notability. His award and his film roles are minor. Mooonswimmer 14:51, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (and salt). Still fails WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 23:48, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG acting roles were minor fails WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.